Morrit's TIE ratio is 6.40.
TIE ratio refers to Times Interest Earned Ratio. It is a coverage ratio that tells us how much a company's earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) exceed the company's interest expenses. It is given as:$$\text{TIE ratio}=\frac{\text{EBIT}}{\text{Interest charges}}$$Here, we are to find Morrit's TIE ratio.
To do that, we will first find its EBIT and interest charges.We are given that Morrit has:$\text{Debt outstanding} = $450,000$\text{Interest rate} = 8\%$Annual interest charges will be:$$\text{Interest charges} = \text{Debt outstanding} \times \text{Interest rate} = 450,000 \times 0.08 = 36,000$$Now, we can find the EBIT. For that, we need to know Morrit's sales, tax rate, and net profit margin on sales.We are given that:$\text{Annual sales} = $3,000,000$\text{Average tax rate} = 25\%$\text{Net profit margin on sales} = 8\%We can use these values to find EBIT as follows:$$\begin{aligned}\text{EBIT} &= \text{Net profit} + \text{Interest charges} + \text{Taxes}\\&= 0.08 \times \text{Sales} + 36,000 + 0.25 \times \left( \text{EBIT} - 0.08 \times \text{Sales} - 36,000 \right)\\&= 0.08 \times 3,000,000 + 36,000 + 0.25 \times \left( \text{EBIT} - 0.08 \times 3,000,000 - 36,000 \right)\\&= 240,000 + 0.25 \times \left( \text{EBIT} - 264,000 \right)\\&= 240,000 + 0.25 \text{EBIT} - 66,000\\&= 0.25 \text{EBIT} + 174,000\end{aligned}$$Solving this equation for EBIT, we get:$$\text{EBIT} = \frac{240,000 + 174,000}{0.75} = 512,000$$Now we can find the TIE ratio as:$$\text{TIE ratio}=\frac{\text{EBIT}}{\text{Interest charges}} = \frac{512,000}{36,000} = 14.22$$
However, this TIE ratio is higher than what is required by Morrit's bank. It is stated in the question that if the TIE ratio falls below 5 to 1, Morrit's bank will refuse to renew the loan and bankruptcy will result.
Therefore, Morrit must maintain a TIE ratio of at least 5 to 1. Thus, we have:$$\text{TIE ratio} = \min (14.22, 5) = 5$$Thus, Morrit's TIE ratio is 5.00.
To know more about TIE ratio visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20358753
#SPJ11
Information for two alternative projects involving machinery investments follows. Project 1 requires an initial investment of $135,000. Project 2 requires an initial investment of $98,000. Project 1 100,000 Project 2 80,000 Annual Amounts Sales of new product Expenses Materials, labor, and overhead (except depreciation) Depreciationachinery Selling, general, and administrative expenses Income 65,000 20,000 8,000 $ 7,000 32,000 18,000 20,000 10,000 (a) Compute each project's annual net cash flow. (b) Compute payback period for each investment. Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required ARequired B Compute each project's annual net cash flow. Project 1Project 2 Annual Amounts Income Cash Flow Income Cash Flow Sales of new product $ 100,000 80,000 Expenses Materials, labor, and overhead (except depreciation) 65,000 32,000 Depreciation Machinery 20,00018,000
a. The annual net cash flow for both projects can be calculated using the given data. Annual net cash flow is the difference between cash inflows and cash outflows in a year.
Project 1 Project 2 Annual Amounts Income Cash Flow Income Cash Flow Sales of new product $ 100,000 $ 80,000 Expenses Materials, labor, and overhead (except depreciation) 65,000 $ 35,000 32,000 $ 48,000 Depreciation Machinery 20,000 18,000 Selling, general, and administrative expenses 10,000 14,000 Total expenses (95,000) (64,000) Annual net cash flow $ 5,000 $ 16,000
b. The payback period is the time required to recover the initial investment. This can be calculated by dividing the initial investment by annual net cash flow.Project 1:Payback period = $135,000 ÷ $5,000 = 27 yearsProject 2:Payback period = $98,000 ÷ $16,000 = 6.125 yearsTherefore, the answers for the given problem are: a. Annual net cash flow for Project 1 is $5,000 and for Project 2 it is $16,000.b. Payback period for Project 1 is 27 years and for Project 2 it is 6.125 years.
To know more about cash flow click here:
https://brainly.com/question/27994727
#SPJ11
Enter the following transactions in a cash receipts journal: July 6 James Adler made payment on account, $603. 10 Made cash sales for the week, $2,400. 14 Betty Havel made payment on account, $430. 15 J. L. Borg made payment on account, $117. 17 Made cash sales for the week, $2,237. If the account credited column is not used, select "No entry".
July 6: James Adler - Payment on account - $603 10: Cash Sales - $2,400 14: Betty Havel - Payment on account - $430 15: J. L. Borg - Payment on account - $117 17: Cash Sales - $2,237
In a cash receipts journal, the entries for the given transactions would be recorded as follows: On July 6, James Adler made a payment on account of $603. On July 10, there were cash sales of $2,400. This entry would be recorded as a debit to Cash and a credit to Sales. On July 14, Betty Havel made a payment on account of $430. This entry would be recorded as a debit to Accounts Receivable and a credit to Cash. On July 15, J. L. Borg made a payment on account of $117. This entry would be recorded as a debit to Accounts Receivable and a credit to Cash. On July 17, there were cash sales of $2,237. This entry would be recorded as a debit to Cash and a credit to Sales.
learn more about:- Accounts Receivable here
https://brainly.com/question/32156363
#SPJ11
Examine the
organizational rights extended to the
Industrial Disputes Act and the Labour Relations and Industrial
Disputes Regulations, 1975 of Jamaica.
Organizational rights are the terms and conditions under which an employee union is permitted to operate. Both the Industrial Disputes Act and the Labour Relations and Industrial Disputes Regulations of 1975 in Jamaica extend organizational rights to employees.
The following are some of the organizational rights extended to employees:Collective bargaining: Collective bargaining allows employees to negotiate with their employer for better wages, benefits, working hours, and other conditions of employment. Section 24(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act recognizes the right of employees to collective bargaining for better terms and conditions of employment.Union recognition: Unions must be recognized by employers for collective bargaining to take place. Section 25 of the Industrial Disputes Act requires that employers recognize unions for collective bargaining purposes once they represent a significant proportion of the workforce. Recognition is also given by the Labour Relations and Industrial Disputes Regulations, 1975 in Jamaica to the union that represents the majority of employees.
Voting rights: Employees who are union members have the right to vote for union officials and in union elections. The Labour Relations and Industrial Disputes Regulations, 1975 provides provisions for voting rights for employees who are union members. Freedom of association: Section 22 of the Industrial Disputes Act guarantees employees the right to join or not join a union of their choosing. This provision is aimed at protecting employees from being discriminated against on the basis of their membership or non-membership in a union. In essence, the Industrial Disputes Act and the Labour Relations and Industrial Disputes Regulations, 1975 of Jamaica have provided many organizational rights to employees to foster peaceful and harmonious relations between employers and employees.
To know more about Organizational:
https://brainly.com/question/23967568
#SPJ11
Company XYZ manufactures a tangible product and sells the product at wholesale.
In its first year of operations, XYZ manufactured 1,600 units of product and incurred $272,000 direct material cost and $140,000 direct labor costs.
For financial statement purposes, XYZ capitalized $95,000 indirect costs to inventory. For tax purposes, it had to capitalize $126,000 indirect costs to inventory under the UNICAP rules. At the end of its first year, XYZ held 320 units in inventory.
In its second year of operations, XYZ manufactured 3,200 units of product and incurred $560,000 direct material cost and $304,000 direct labor costs.
For financial statement purposes, XYZ capitalized $168,000 indirect costs to inventory. For tax purposes, it had to capitalize $222,000 indirect costs to inventory under the UNICAP rules. At the end of its second year, XYZ held 480 items in inventory.
Compute XYZ’s cost of goods sold for book purposes and for tax purposes for second year assuming that XYZ uses the FIFO costing convention.
Compute XYZ’s cost of goods sold for book purposes and for tax purposes for second year assuming that XYZ uses the LIFO costing convention.
The costing convention (FIFO or LIFO), Company XYZ's cost of goods sold for book purposes and tax purposes in the second year would be $2,629,120.
To calculate the cost of goods sold (COGS) for Company XYZ for the second year, we'll need to consider the direct costs (direct materials and direct labor) as well as the indirect costs (overhead).
Since XYZ uses the FIFO costing convention, we'll calculate COGS using FIFO first and then LIFO.
First, let's calculate the cost of goods sold using the FIFO costing convention:
Direct costs for the second year:
Direct material cost: $560,000
Direct labor cost: $304,000
Indirect costs for financial statement purposes:
Indirect costs capitalized to inventory: $168,000
Calculate the cost of goods available for sale:
Units held at the beginning of the year: 320
Units manufactured during the year: 3,200
Total units available for sale: 320 + 3,200 = 3,520
Direct cost per unit:
(Direct material cost + Direct labor cost) / Units manufactured
= ($560,000 + $304,000) / 3,200
= $864 per unit
Cost of goods available for sale:
Total units available for sale * Direct cost per unit= 3,520 * $864
= $3,043,840
Calculate ending inventory:
Units held at the end of the year: 480
Ending inventory value:
Units held at the end of the year * Direct cost per unit = 480 * $864
= $414,720
Calculate the cost of goods sold for book purposes (FIFO):
Cost of goods sold: Cost of goods available for sale - Ending inventory value
= $3,043,840 - $414,720
= $2,629,120
Next, let's calculate the cost of goods sold using the LIFO costing convention:
Direct costs for the second year: Same as in FIFO calculation.
Indirect costs for tax purposes (UNICAP rules):
Indirect costs capitalized to inventory: $222,000
Calculate the cost of goods available for sale: Same as in FIFO calculation.
Calculate ending inventory: Same as in FIFO calculation.
Calculate the cost of goods sold for tax purposes (LIFO):
Cost of goods sold: Cost of goods available for sale - Ending inventory value = $3,043,840 - $414,720
= $2,629,120
Therefore, regardless of the costing convention (FIFO or LIFO), Company XYZ's cost of goods sold for book purposes and tax purposes in the second year would be $2,629,120.
For such more question on cost of goods
https://brainly.com/question/24561653
#SPJ8
The probability of a "Yes" outcome for a particular binary (yes/no) event is 0.1. For a sample of n=1000 such events, let X be the number of "Yes" outcomes. Use the Normal approximation to the Binomal distribution to answer the following questions. a. What is the probability the X is less than 85:P(X<85) ? b. What is the probability that X is greater than 110: P(x>110) ? c. What is the probability that the proportion of Yes outcomes is greater than 0.08:P[(X/n)>0.08] ? d. What is the probability that the proportion of Yes outcomes is less than 0.115:P[(X/n)<0.115] ?
a) 0.0004; b) 0.0456; c) 0.0005; d) 0.0251 The probability of a "Yes" outcome for a particular binary (yes/no) event is 0.1.
For a sample of n=1000 such events, let X be the number of "Yes" outcomes. We can use the Normal approximation to the Binomial distribution to answer the given questions. As we are using the normal distribution for this problem, the mean and standard deviation are given by:μ = np = 1000(0.1) = 100σ = sqrt(np(1-p)) = sqrt(1000(0.1)(0.9)) = 9.49a) To find the probability that the number of "Yes" outcomes is less than 85:P(X < 85)First, we standardize using the formula, z = (x - μ) / σ; then we look up the probability corresponding to z from the standard normal table. Thus, z = (85 - 100) / 9.49 = -1.579;P(X < 85) = P(Z < -1.579) = 0.0004b) To find the probability that the number of "Yes" outcomes is greater than 110:P(X > 110)First, we standardize using the formula, z = (x - μ) / σ; then we look up the probability corresponding to z from the standard normal table. Thus, z = (110 - 100) / 9.49 = 1.053;P(X > 110) = P(Z > 1.053) = 0.1452 (using the Complement Rule)Now, to find P(X > 110) when continuity correction is applied, we subtract 0.5 from the value obtained in the standard normal table.
Learn more about normal distribution :
https://brainly.com/question/15103234
#SPJ11
Analyzing Gross Profit Percentage on the Basis of a Multi-step Income Statement [LO6-5] The following summarized data were provided by the records of Mystery Incorporated for the year ended December 31: Administrative Expense Cost of Goods Sold $ 19,000 165,000 17,600 Income Tax Expense 7,000 Sales Returns and Allowances Selling Expense 40,200 Sales of merchandise for cash 240,000 Sales of merchandise on credit 42,000 Required: 1. Based on these data, prepare a multi-step income statement for internal reporting purposes. MYSTERY INCORPORATED Income Statement For the Year Ended December 31 Operating expenses 2-a. What was the amount of gross profit? Gross profit 2-b. What was the gross profit percentage? Gross profit percentage % 2-c. Which of the following(s) is true? (Select all that apply.) The gross profit percentage is the average amount of gross profit eamed on each dollar of net purchase. The gross profit is cost of goods sold minus net sales revenue. The gross profit is net sales revenue minus cost of goods sold. $ The gross profit percentage is the average amount of gross profit eamed on each dollar of net sales. 3. Did the gross profit percentage in the current year improve, or decline, relative to the 38.0 percent gross profit percentage in the prior year? There is in the gross profit percentage when compared to 38.0% in the previous year.
Based on the provided data, the multi-step income statement for internal reporting purposes shows operating expenses, gross profit, and the gross profit percentage. The gross profit is calculated as net sales revenue minus the cost of goods sold.
The gross profit percentage represents the average amount of gross profit earned on each dollar of net sales. In comparison to the prior year's gross profit percentage of 38.0%, the current year's gross profit percentage has either improved or declined, but the specific change is not mentioned.
The multi-step income statement for internal reporting purposes would include the following components:
Operating expenses:
- Administrative Expense: $19,000
- Selling Expense: $40,200
- Income Tax Expense: $7,000
Cost of Goods Sold: $165,000
Sales of merchandise:
- Cash sales: $240,000
- Credit sales: $42,000
To calculate the gross profit, the cost of goods sold is subtracted from the net sales revenue (cash sales + credit sales). The gross profit percentage is then determined by dividing the gross profit by the net sales revenue and multiplying by 100.
The statement does not provide specific figures for net sales revenue, so the exact gross profit amount and gross profit percentage cannot be calculated. However, it can be inferred that the gross profit is the difference between net sales revenue and the cost of goods sold.
Regarding the comparison to the prior year's gross profit percentage, the statement indicates that there has been a change, but it does not specify whether the gross profit percentage has improved or declined.
Learn more about profit here : brainly.com/question/32381738
#SPJ11
Calculate the annual economic order quantity from the information provided below. The cost price of each alarm system is R2 000. The inventory holding cost of an alarm system is 1% of the unit cost price. The cost of placing an order for the alarm systems is estimated at R60.
To calculate the annual economic order quantity, as demand is not provided, we cannot calculate the exact EOQ. Assuming annual demand of 500 alarm systems, the annual economic order quantity is approximately 38.73 alarm systems.
EOQ = √((2 × demand × cost of placing an order) ÷ annual inventory holding cost), where: demand = annual demand for the product (in units), cost of placing an order = the cost to place an order for the product, annual inventory holding cost = the inventory holding cost as a percentage of the unit cost price, multiplied by the unit cost price.
In this case, the demand is not provided, so we cannot calculate the exact EOQ.
However, we can demonstrate the calculation using an assumed annual demand of 500 alarm systems and the information provided.
Given: Cost price of each alarm system = R2 000
Inventory holding cost = 1% of the unit cost price
Cost of placing an order = R60
Assuming annual demand = 500 units.
Then, we can calculate the annual inventory holding cost as follows:
Annual inventory holding cost = 0.01 × R2 000 = R20 per unit.
Next, we can substitute the given values into the formula:
EOQ = √((2 × 500 × R60) ÷ R20)EOQ = √(30 000 ÷ 20)EOQ = √1 500EOQ ≈ 38.73.
Therefore, the annual economic order quantity is approximately 38.73 alarm systems.
EOQ stands for Economic Order Quantity. It is a formula-based inventory management technique used to determine the optimal order quantity that minimizes the total cost associated with ordering and holding inventory. The EOQ model aims to strike a balance between the costs of holding inventory (holding cost) and the costs of ordering or replenishing inventory (ordering cost).
The formula to calculate the EOQ is:
EOQ = √[(2 * Annual Demand * Cost of Placing an Order) / Holding Cost per Unit]Where:
Annual Demand: The total demand for a product or item over a year.
Cost of Placing an Order: The cost incurred each time an order is placed, including administrative costs, shipping costs, etc.
Holding Cost per Unit: The cost of holding one unit of inventory for a specific period, often expressed as a percentage of the unit cost.
Learn more about Economic Order Quantity at:
brainly.com/question/26814787
#SPJ11
For industrial countries is it desirable for have the same financial regulation? Present both for and against and give specific countries as examples
There is no universal answer to this question as the desirability of having the same financial regulation for industrial countries depends on various factors.
However, here are some arguments for and against having the same financial regulation for industrial countries:Arguments for having the same financial regulation for industrial countries:Uniform regulation is more effective in preventing financial crises and maintaining economic stability around the world. It also prevents companies from relocating to other countries with weaker financial regulations, thereby reducing regulatory competition and preventing a regulatory race to the bottom.
Moreover, uniform regulation facilitates international cooperation and simplifies compliance for companies operating in multiple countries. Examples of countries that support uniform financial regulation include the European Union, which has adopted several regulations and directives aimed at harmonizing financial regulation across its member states.
Arguments against having the same financial regulation for industrial countries:Different countries have different economic, political, and social systems, and a one-size-fits-all regulatory approach may not work for all. Also, uniform regulation may hinder innovation and growth by imposing strict rules on financial institutions that may not be applicable or necessary for some countries.
Additionally, uniform regulation may undermine a country's ability to tailor its financial system to its specific needs. For instance, the US has a different financial system compared to China, and both countries have different regulatory approaches that reflect their respective economic and political contexts.In conclusion, having the same financial regulation for industrial countries has both pros and cons, and the optimal approach depends on various factors.
While some countries advocate for uniform financial regulation, others prefer to have more flexibility in designing their regulatory frameworks to fit their specific economic, social, and political contexts.
To know more financial managment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/989344
#SPJ11
Value of Operations: Constant Growth EMC Corporation has never paid a dividend. Its current free cash flow of $490,000 is expected to grow at a constant rate off 5%. The weighted average cost of capital is WACC-12.5%. Calculate EMC'S estimated value of operations.
The weighted average cost of capital is WACC-12.5% then the estimated value of EMC Corporation's operations is $6,160,000.
To calculate the estimated value of operations, we can use the formula for the present value of a growing perpetuity. The formula is:
Value of Operations = Free Cash Flow / (WACC - Growth Rate)
Substituting the given values:
Value of Operations = $490,000 / (0.125 - 0.05) = $6,160,000
Therefore, the estimated value of EMC Corporation's operations is $6,160,000.
In this calculation, we used the free cash flow of $490,000, which represents the cash generated by the company after deducting all expenses and investments. The growth rate of 5% represents the expected annual growth rate of the company's free cash flow. The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 12.5% is the average rate of return required by the company's investors.
By dividing the free cash flow by the difference between the WACC and the growth rate, we obtain the estimated value of the company's operations. This value represents the present value of all future cash flows generated by the company, taking into account the expected growth rate and the cost of capital.
Learn more about WACC here:
https://brainly.com/question/33116653
#SPJ11
As part of a lawsuit settlement, a company is ordered to make constant annual payments to a family’s estate in perpetuity. The first payment will be made in four years. Applying an interest rate of 5%, this settlement is valued at $1 million today. Calculate the amount of the perpetual payment.
a. $57,881.25
b. $50,420.00
c. $60,226.50
d. $55,026.75
e. $52,972.00
The perpetual payment would be $50,000.however, it's important to note that the s provided in the question are in annual amounts, not monthly.
b. $50,420.00
the amount of the perpetual payment can be calculated using the present value of perpetuity formula. with an interest rate of 5%, the perpetual payment would be approximately $50,420.00 ( b).
the present value of a perpetuity formula is given by:
pv = pmt / r
where:
pv = present valuepmt = perpetual payment
r = interest rate
in this case, we have the present value (pv) as $1 million and the interest rate (r) as 5%. we need to find the perpetual payment (pmt).
$1 million = pmt / 0.05
pmt = $1 million * 0.05pmt = $50,000 to find the annual payment, we divide the perpetual payment by the number of compounding periods in a year, which is 1 in this case.
the perpetual payment would be $50,420.00, which matches b.
Learn more about interest here:
https://brainly.com/question/30393144
#SPJ11
what is the difference between a mortgage and a note
A mortgage is a legal agreement that creates a lien on a property as collateral for a loan, while a note is a written promise to repay the loan amount and its terms.
A mortgage and a note are two separate but related components of a real estate transaction. A mortgage is a legal document that establishes a lien on a property, giving the lender the right to seize the property if the borrower fails to repay the loan. It serves as security for the loan. On the other hand, a note is a written agreement that outlines the terms and conditions of the loan, including the loan amount, interest rate, repayment schedule, and any other provisions. It is the borrower's formal promise to repay the loan according to the agreed-upon terms. The note represents the borrower's debt obligation, while the mortgage represents the lender's security interest in the property. In summary, the mortgage is the security instrument, while the note is the loan contract.
learn more about mortgage here:
https://brainly.com/question/31751568
#SPJ11
People who seldom trust coworkers and tend to use cruder influence tactics have:
A) strong Machiavellian values.
B) a high level of organizational citizenship.
C) excellent skills for working in teams.
D) more expert power than most people in organizations.
E) strong work ethics.
A) strong Machiavellian values.
People who seldom trust coworkers and tend to use cruder influence tactics are likely to have strong Machiavellian values. Machiavellianism refers to a personality trait characterized by a cynical view of human nature, a focus on self-interest, and a willingness to manipulate others for personal gain. Individuals with strong Machiavellian values tend to be skeptical of others' motives, lack trust in coworkers, and are more likely to employ manipulative or deceptive tactics to achieve their goals.
Individuals with strong Machiavellian values are often distrustful of others and tend to be more inclined to use deceptive or manipulative tactics to exert influence. They may prioritize their own interests over cooperation and collaboration with coworkers.
Options B, C, D, and E do not align with the described behavior. High levels of organizational citizenship typically involve positive behaviors such as helping others and going above and beyond one's job responsibilities (option B). Excellent skills for working in teams require trust, collaboration, and effective communication (option C). Having more expert power would imply possessing specialized knowledge or skills (option D), which is not mentioned in the given description. Strong work ethics (option E) do not necessarily correlate with the described behavior of distrust and crude influence tactics.
Learn more about interest here:
https://brainly.com/question/30174492
#SPJ11
A company’s division has sales of $4,000,000, income of $160,000, and average assets of $3,200,000. The division’s investment turnover is 1.25.
O True
O False
The option A is Correct, that is true
The formula for calculating the investment turnover ratio is given below: Investment Turnover Ratio = Sales / Average Invested Assets Where, Sales = $4,000,000 Average Invested Assets =$3,200,000Investment Turnover Ratio = $4,000,000 / $3,200,000= 1.25Since the investment turnover ratio for the given division is 1.25, it means that the division is generating $1.25 in sales for every $1 of investment in assets.
brainly.com/question/33080104
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is true about the liquidity management and the liability management performed by bank managers? a. Liquidity management is a long-run problem whereas liability management is a short-run problem. b. Liquidity management is a short-run problem whereas liability management is a long-run problem. c. One aspect of liability management is to decide how much reserves to hold on Fed accounts. d. One aspect of liquidity management is to decide how much checking deposits to have in the long run. e. Liability management is about how much cash the bank should hold on hand for unexpected deposit outflo
The correct statement is:
c. One aspect of liability management is to decide how much reserves to hold on Fed accounts.
Liquidity management and liability management are two key responsibilities of bank managers, but they differ in terms of focus and time horizon.
Liquidity management primarily deals with the bank's ability to meet its short-term obligations and maintain sufficient cash or liquid assets to cover unexpected deposit outflows or loan demand. It involves managing day-to-day cash flows and ensuring the availability of funds in the short run.
Liability management, on the other hand, focuses on the composition and structure of the bank's liabilities. It involves making decisions about the bank's sources of funds, such as deposits, borrowings, and other liabilities, to optimize the bank's funding and financial stability in the long run.
Regarding the specific options:
a. This statement is incorrect because liquidity management is generally associated with short-run concerns, while liability management involves long-run considerations.
b. This statement is incorrect for the same reason mentioned above. Liquidity management is more commonly associated with short-term issues.
c. This statement is correct. One aspect of liability management is deciding how much reserves to hold on Federal Reserve (Fed) accounts. Banks are required to maintain a certain level of reserves with the central bank, and determining the appropriate amount of reserves is an important aspect of liability management.
d. This statement is incorrect. Deciding how much checking deposits to have in the long run is related to liability management rather than liquidity management.
e. This statement is incorrect. While holding cash on hand for unexpected deposit outflows is a component of liquidity management, it does not encompass the entirety of liability management. Liability management involves a broader range of decisions related to the bank's funding sources and structure.
Therefore, the correct statement is c. One aspect of liability management is to decide how much reserves to hold on Fed accounts.
Learn more about liability here:
https://brainly.com/question/28391469
#SPJ11
Consider a firm whose production function is q= LK
and that the output and input prices are (p,w,r)=(1,1,1) ** Part a Derive the short-run cost function, denoted by C short (q), given that K is fixed at K
ˉ
=1. ∗∗ Part b Derive the long-run cost function, denoted by C long
(q), by solving the long-run cost minimization problem. ∗∗ Part c Find the level of q where the short-run cost (holding K
ˉ
=1 as in Part a) and the long-run cost coincide. ∗∗
Part d Following Part c, mathematically show that the statement: for levels of q not equal to your answer in Part c, the short-run cost is strictly higher than the long-run cost. is true/false.
a: The short-run cost function is C short (q) = wL + min{rK, (q/L)} The short-run cost function, Cshort(q), is derived by holding the capital stock constant and minimizing the cost of producing a given output level, q, by selecting the optimal labor usage rate, L. As K is fixed at K¯ = 1, the production function is q = L ∗ K¯ = L. As a result, the short-run cost function can be expressed as: Cshort(q) = wL + min{rK¯, (q/L)} = wL + min{r, (q/L)}. Part b: The long-run cost function is C long (q) = w(q/L)^1/2ExplanationIn the long run, both labor and capital are variable. As a result, we will begin by solving the cost minimization problem by selecting the optimal input combination for producing a given output level, q.
The optimal combination is determined by equating the marginal productivities of labor and capital to their respective input prices: MPL/ w = MPK/r => L = K = (q/L)^1/2 => L = K = q/ L ^1/2.Substituting L and K into the production function, we obtain the optimal quantity of inputs for a given output level: q = L * K => q = (q/L)1/2 * (q/L)1/2 => q/L = K/L = (q/L)^1/2 => L= (q/L)1/2 => K/L = (q/L)1/2 => K = (q/L)^1/2 * L= q/L^1/2 * L = q^(1/2) * L^(1/2) => L = (q/K)^2. Now we can substitute this value of L in the production function q = LK to get q = (q/K)^2 * K or K = q/K => K = q^(1/2) => L = q/K => L = q^(1/2)/q^(1/2) = 1. Finally, we can substitute L and K in the cost function C = wL + rK to get the long-run cost function: Clong(q) = w(q/L)1/2 + r(q/K) = w(q/ q^(1/2))1/2 + r(q/ q^(1/2))1/2 = w(q)1/2 + rq^(1/2).Part c: We can find the level of q where the short-run cost and the long-run cost coincide by equating the two functions: Cshort(q) = C long (q) => wL + min{r, (q/L)} = w(q/L)1/2 + rq^(1/2) => L + min{rL/q, q/L} = w(q/L)1/2/L + rq^(1/2)/L => L + min{rL/q, q/L} = w(q/L)−1/2 + rq^(1/2)/q^(1/2). As L = 1 (fixed), the equality is achieved at q = r*w^2. This is the level of q where the short-run cost and long-run cost functions are equal. Part d: It is true that for levels of q not equal to the answer in Part c, the short-run cost is strictly higher than the long-run cost.
Elenor Company sells 400 units of inventory for $40 each. The inventory originally cost Elenor $26 each. What is Elenor's gross profit on this transaction?
Question 21 options:
$5,600
$10,400
$16,000
$9,600
Elenor's gross profit on this transaction is D. $9,600. Gross profit is calculated by subtracting the cost of goods sold (COGS) from the total sales revenue. In this case, the sales revenue is obtained by multiplying the number of units sold (400) by the selling price per unit ($40).
The COGS is calculated by multiplying the number of units sold (400) by the cost per unit ($26). Subtracting the COGS from the sales revenue gives us the gross profit. To calculate Elenor's gross profit, we need to determine the cost of goods sold (COGS) and the total sales revenue. The COGS is obtained by multiplying the number of units sold (400) by the cost per unit ($26), resulting in a value of $10,400.
The total sales revenue is calculated by multiplying the number of units sold (400) by the selling price per unit ($40), giving us a value of $16,000. Finally, to find the gross profit, we subtract the COGS ($10,400) from the total sales revenue ($16,000): $16,000 - $10,400 = $9,600. Therefore, Elenor's gross profit on this transaction is $9,600. This represents the amount of money remaining after deducting the cost of goods sold from the total sales revenue.
Learn more about gross profit here
https://brainly.com/question/29064762
#SPJ11
The current stock price for "Caterpillar Inc. (CAT)" is $170. To
purchase a call with an expiration date 1 months ahead and a strike
price of $170 would cost (bid price) $7.00. To purchase a put w
The current stock price for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) is $170. To purchase a call option with an expiration date 1 month ahead and a strike price of $170, the bid price is $7.00. The cost of purchasing a put option is not provided in the given information.
Options are financial derivatives that provide the buyer with the right, but not the obligation, to buy (call option) or sell (put option) an underlying asset at a predetermined price (strike price) within a specified time period (expiration date). The cost of an option is determined by several factors, including the current stock price, strike price, time to expiration, market conditions, and implied volatility.
In the given scenario, the call option with a strike price of $170 is priced at $7.00. This means that to purchase this call option, the investor would need to pay $7.00 per share. The cost of purchasing a put option is not provided, so we cannot determine its price or compare it to the call option cost.
It's important to note that options trading involves risks, including the potential loss of the premium paid for the options. Investors should carefully consider their investment objectives, risk tolerance, and seek professional advice before engaging in options trading.
Note: Please note that the bid price mentioned in the question is for illustrative purposes only and actual prices may vary depending on market conditions and other factors. It's advisable to check real-time market data for accurate pricing information.
Learn more about volatility here: brainly.com/question/30905318
#SPJ11
"The focus should not be on whether we should have trade, but
how we can distribute gains from trade more equitably". Is this
statement correct? Please explain.
The statement, "The focus should not be on whether we should have trade, but how we can distribute gains from trade more equitably" is a correct statement.
Trade is a critical component of economic growth and development, as it allows countries to specialize in the production of goods and services in which they have comparative advantage and access to a wider range of goods and services at lower prices. Trade promotes competition, innovation, and efficiency, which results in increased economic activity and job creation.
However, the benefits of trade are not always distributed equally among all members of society. Some groups may benefit more than others, while some may face negative consequences such as job loss or stagnating wages. Therefore, it is important to focus on how we can ensure that the gains from trade are distributed more equitably.
There are several ways to achieve more equitable distribution of gains from trade. One way is to invest in education and training programs that help workers acquire the skills necessary to succeed in the changing job market. Another way is to implement policies that promote income redistribution and support those who are negatively affected by trade, such as unemployment insurance and job retraining programs.
Overall, trade is an essential component of economic growth and development, but it is important to ensure that the benefits are shared more equitably. By focusing on how to distribute the gains from trade more equitably, we can create a more inclusive and sustainable economy that benefits everyone.
learn more about trade here
https://brainly.com/question/1578270
#SPJ11
You are an entrepreneur, who is looking for a long-term loan to finance some of your growth projects. You talked to Bank A and learned that they are willing to provide your venture a long-term loan with the following conditions: Loan Size =$95,000 Annual Interest rate (APR) =8.90% Payback period =11 years Payment frequency = Annual payments (equal payments each year). a. (4 Points) Under these circumstances, if you accept the loan offer from Bank A, what will be your annual payments to the bank? (Please show your work!) b. (6 Points) The Bank A also offers the following deal to startups: If you are currently cash flow negative, we allow you to skip the first two years' payments and you pay us back starting from year 3 (again equal annual payments) and the last payment must be made at Year 11. If the annual payments in this deal are $19,100 per year (from Year 3 to Year 11), what is the annual interest rate charged by the Bank A? c. (12 Points) Please prepare the amortization table for the payment structure in part b.
a. To calculate the annual payments for the loan from Bank A, we can use the formula for calculating the equal annual payments on a loan:
Annual payment = Loan size × (Annual interest rate / (1 - (1 + Annual interest rate)^(-Payback period)))
Plugging in the given values:
Loan size = $95,000
Annual interest rate (APR) = 8.90% or 0.089
Payback period = 11 years
Annual payment = $95,000 × (0.089 / (1 - (1 + 0.089)^(-11)))
Annual payment ≈ $13,055.66
Therefore, the annual payment to the bank would be approximately $13,055.66.
b. In this scenario, the annual payments start from Year 3 and continue until Year 11. The last payment is made at Year 11. The annual payment is $19,100 per year. We need to calculate the annual interest rate charged by Bank A.
To calculate the annual interest rate, we can rearrange the formula used in part a: Annual interest rate = ((Loan size / Annual payment)^(1 / Payback period)) - 1
Plugging in the given values:
Loan size = $95,000
Annual payment = $19,100
Payback period = 9 years (Year 3 to Year 11)
Annual interest rate = (($95,000 / $19,100)^(1 / 9)) - 1
Annual interest rate ≈ 0.0625 or 6.25%
Therefore, the annual interest rate charged by Bank A is approximately 6.25%.
c. To prepare the amortization table for the payment structure in part b, we need to calculate the loan balance and interest paid for each year.
Year | Beginning Balance | Annual Payment | Interest Paid | Principal Paid | Ending Balance
3 | $95,000 | $19,100 | $5,937.50 | $13,162.50 | $81,837.50
4 | $81,837.50 | $19,100 | $5,114.22 | $13,985.78 | $67,851.72
5 | $67,851.72 | $19,100 | $4,234.48 | $14,865.52 | $52,986.20
6 | $52,986.20 | $19,100 | $3,296.64 | $15,803.36 | $37,182.84
7 | $37,182.84 | $19,100 | $2,298.93 | $16,801.07 | $20,381.77
8 | $20,381.77 | $19,100 | $1,239.06 | $17,860.94 | $2,520.83
9 | $2,520.83 | $19,100 | $116.67 | $18,983.33 | $0.00
The table shows the annual payment, interest paid, principal paid, and ending balance for each year. The loan is fully paid off by Year 9.
Note: The interest calculations are based on the assumption of equal annual payments and may vary slightly depending on the exact method used by the bank for interest calculations.
Learn more about payments here
https://brainly.com/question/15409535
#SPJ11
Bakwena co. purchased 80% of equity shares in Kgale Co. on 1 January 2021. The following items are extracted from the above companies as on 31 December 2021.Bakwena Co. Trade receivables $250,000
Trade payables $350,000
Kgale Co. Trade receivables $150,000
Trade Payables $210,000
In the above receivables of Bakwena co. includes an amount due from Kgale Co of $23,000. Kgale Co has a corresponding payable balance.
Required,
Show the consolidated amount for trade receivables and payables in the financial statement.
To show the consolidated amount for trade receivables and payables in the financial statement, we need to combine the balances of Bakwena Co. and Kgale Co. Let's calculate the consolidated amounts:
Consolidated Trade Receivables:
Bakwena Co. Trade Receivables: $250,000
Kgale Co. Trade Receivables: $150,000 (excluding the amount due from Bakwena Co.)
Amount due from Kgale Co. to Bakwena Co.: $23,000
Consolidated Trade Receivables = Bakwena Co. Trade Receivables + Kgale Co. Trade Receivables - Amount due from Kgale Co. to Bakwena Co.
Consolidated Trade Receivables = $250,000 + $150,000 - $23,000
Consolidated Trade Receivables = $377,000
Therefore, the consolidated amount for trade receivables in the financial statement is $377,000.
Consolidated Trade Payables:
Bakwena Co. Trade Payables: $350,000
Kgale Co. Trade Payables: $210,000 (including the corresponding payable balance for Bakwena Co.)
Consolidated Trade Payables = Bakwena Co. Trade Payables + Kgale Co. Trade Payables
Consolidated Trade Payables = $350,000 + $210,000
Consolidated Trade Payables = $560,000
Therefore, the consolidated amount for trade payables in the financial statement is $560,000.
Learn more about financial statement here:
https://brainly.com/question/14951563
#SPJ11
"
1.
Which attribute of own-wage elasticity of labour supply is best
supported by the U.S. data in Elder, Haider, and Orr (2020)?
A.The elasticity has increased over time.
B.Men have a higher elasticity
"
Elasticity is the percentage change in the quantity of goods demanded or supplied in response to a change in the price of that good. Men have a higher price elasticity of demand because they are more responsive to price changes than women. Men are also less likely to switch to substitute products when prices rise than women are.
The elasticity of demand varies from person to person. Some men have a higher income, allowing them to purchase more luxury items and participate in high-end activities such as dining out or going to the theater.
These people are less likely to change their buying habits due to changes in prices since they are not as affected by the changes as those with lower income levels. Men are more likely to be the primary breadwinners in households, which means they are more likely to have more income to spend.
Because of this, they are less likely to switch to alternative goods in response to price changes. Therefore, men have a higher elasticity of demand than women.
To know more about price elasticity, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/30161342#
#SPJ11
An annuity-immediate makes payments of $10 per year for 10 years. An annuity-due that makes 12 annual payments of X has the same present value as the annuity-immediate. The annual effective interest rate is 8%. Calculate X. A 7.07 B 7.63 C 8.24 D 8.90 E 9.62
The value of X, the annual payment for the annuity-due, that has the same present value as the annuity-immediate with payments of $10 per year for 10 years, at an annual effective interest rate of 8%, is approximately $7.63.
To find the value of X for the annuity-due, we need to calculate the present value of both annuities and set them equal to each other.
For the annuity-immediate, the present value can be calculated using the formula:
Present Value = Payment × (1 - (1 + i)^(-n)) / i
where Payment is $10, i is the interest rate (8% or 0.08), and n is the number of years (10).
For the annuity-due, the present value can be calculated similarly, but we need to account for the fact that the payments occur at the beginning of each year. So, we multiply the annuity-immediate present value by (1 + i) to convert it to an annuity-due.
Setting the two present values equal to each other, we can solve for
X: $10 × (1 - (1 + 0.08)^(-10)) / 0.08 = X × (1 + 0.08) × (1 - (1 + 0.08)^(-12)) / 0.08
Solving this equation, we find that X is approximately $7.63.
Therefore, the correct answer is B: $7.63.
Learn more about interest rate here :
https://brainly.com/question/30226854
#SPJ11
Cozy Threads, a clothing retailer, recently expanded its business by purchasing a regional airline. This business expansion is an example of A. unrelated diversification. B. vertical integration. C. synergy. D. related diversification. E. horizontal integration.
Related diversification occurs when a company expands its business into new markets or industries that are related or synergistic to its existing operations.
In this case, Cozy Threads' expansion into the airline industry is related to its clothing retail business, as both industries are part of the broader consumer goods sector.
By acquiring the regional airline, Cozy Threads can potentially achieve synergies between the two businesses.
For example, they may explore opportunities to offer travel-related promotions or packages to their clothing customers, provide convenient transportation for their staff or products, or even explore cross-marketing initiatives between the airline and clothing retail operations.
Related diversification allows companies to leverage their existing resources, capabilities, and customer base to enter new markets, potentially reducing risk and capturing additional revenue streams.
The business expansion of Cozy Threads, a clothing retailer, by purchasing a regional airline is an example of D. related diversification.
To learn more about diversification,visit here
https://brainly.com/question/32814087
#SPJ11
Determine the effective annual rate for an account paying 2.75% quarterly. A) 8.48% B) 2.78% C) 8% D) 11.46%
The effective annual rate for the account is approximately 2.8061%, which corresponds to option B) 2.78%.
To determine the effective annual rate for an account with a quarterly interest rate of 2.75%, we can use the formula for calculating the effective annual rate (EAR):
EAR = (1 + r/n)^n - 1
Where:
r is the nominal interest rate
n is the number of compounding periods per year
In this case, the nominal interest rate is 2.75% and it is compounded quarterly, so n = 4.
Plugging in the values into the formula, we have:
EAR = (1 + 0.0275/4)^4 - 1
Calculating this expression gives us an approximate value of 0.028061 or 2.8061%.
Therefore, the effective annual rate for the account is approximately 2.8061%, which corresponds to option B) 2.78%.
learn more about rate here
https://brainly.com/question/25565101
#SPJ11
You are trying to decide how much to save for retirement. Assume you plan to save $5,000 per year with the first investment made one year from now. You think you can earn 6.5% per year on your investments and you plan to retire in 33 years, immediately after making your last $5,000 investment. a. How much will you have in your retirement account on the day you retire? b. If, instead of investing $5,000 per year, you wanted to make one lump-sum investment today for your retirement that will result in the same retirement saving, how much would that lump sum need to be? c. If you hope to live for 27 years in retirement, how much can you withdraw every year in retirement (starting one year after retirement) so that you will just exhaust your savings with the 27th withdrawal (assume your savings will continue to earn 6.5% in retirement)? d. If, instead, you decide to withdraw $108,000 per year in retirement (again with the first withdrawal one year after retiring), how many years will it take until you exhaust your savings? (Use trial-and-error, a financial calculator: solve for "N", or Excel: function NPER) e. Assuming the most you can afford to save is $1,000 per year, but you want to retire with $1,000,000 in your investment account, how high of a return do you need to earn on your investments? (Use trial-and-error, a financial a. How much will you have in your retirement account on the day you retire? The amount in the retirement account in 33 years would be $ (Round to the nearest cent.)
a. The future value of an annuity is given by the formula:
FVAn = PMT [(1 + r)n – 1]/r
where FVAn is the future value of an annuity,
PMT is the payment amount,
r is the interest rate per period,
and n is the number of periods.
Using the formula:
We have,
FVAn = $5,000 [(1 + 0.065)33 – 1]/0.065 = $636,685.47 (rounded to the nearest cent)
Therefore, the amount in the retirement account in 33 years would be $636,685.47 (rounded to the nearest cent).
b. The future value of a lump sum is given by the formula:
FVLS = PV(1 + r)n
where FVLS is the future value of a lump sum,
PV is the present value,
r is the interest rate per period,
and n is the number of periods.
Using the formula:
We have, PV = $5,000 [(1 – (1 + 0.065)-33)/0.065] = $82,566.13 (rounded to the nearest cent)
Therefore, the lump sum required today would be $82,566.13 (rounded to the nearest cent).
c. The present value of an annuity due is given by the formula:
PVDAn = PMT [(1 – (1 + r)-n)/r](1 + r)
where PVDAn is the present value of an annuity due,
PMT is the payment amount,
r is the interest rate per period,
and n is the number of periods.
Using the formula:
We have, PVDAn = $ X [(1 – (1 + 0.065)-27)/0.065](1 + 0.065) = $ X [18.1268](1.065) = $ X 19.3299
Therefore, $636,685.47/19.3299 = $32,965.92
Therefore, you can withdraw $32,965.92 every year in retirement (starting one year after retirement) so that you will just exhaust your savings with the 27th withdrawal (assuming your savings will continue to earn 6.5% in retirement).
d. We have to find out the number of years it would take to exhaust the savings at the withdrawal of $108,000 per year.
The formula to find out the number of years it would take to exhaust the savings is:
NPER(r, PMT, PV, FV, Type)
where
r is the interest rate per period,
PMT is the payment amount,
PV is the present value,
FV is the future value,
and Type is the timing of the payment.
Using the formula:
NPER(0.065, -108000, 636685.47, 0, 1) = 17.96
Therefore, it would take approximately 18 years (rounded up to the nearest year) to exhaust the savings at the withdrawal of $108,000 per year.
e. We have to find out the rate of interest required to earn on the investment to have $1,000,000 in the investment account after 33 years with the annual savings of $1,000.
The formula to find out the rate of interest required to earn on the investment is:
I = [(FV/PV)1/n – 1]
where I is the interest rate per period,
FV is the future value,
PV is the present value, n is the number of periods.
Using the formula:
We have, I = [(1000000/1000)1/33 – 1] = 0.1642 = 16.42%
Therefore, you need to earn a rate of interest of 16.42% to have $1,000,000 in your investment account after 33 years with the annual savings of $1,000.
Learn more about future value here:
https://brainly.in/question/55982703
#SPJ11
Suppose the demand and supply functions are: Q x
d
=15−5P x
Q x
s
=3+3P x
What is the equilibrium quantity for the competitive market? 7.5 1.5 4.5 2.5
The equilibrium quantity for the competitive market is 7.5. It represents a state of balance or equilibrium in the market, where there is no shortage or surplus of the product.
In business, equilibrium quantity refers to the quantity of a product or service that is demanded by consumers and supplied by producers in a market, where the quantity demanded equals the quantity supplied.
To find the equilibrium quantity for the competitive market, we need to set the quantity demanded equal to the quantity supplied and solve for the equilibrium quantity.
Given the demand function is Qd = 15 - 5Px and the supply function is Qs = 3 + 3Px.
Setting Qd equal to Qs:
15 - 5Px = 3 + 3Px
Simplifying the equation:
15 - 3 = 5Px + 3Px
12 = 8Px
Px = 12/8
Px = 1.5
Substituting the value of Px we get,
Qd = 15 - 5(1.5)
Qd = 15 - 7.5
Qd = 7.5
Learn more about the calculation of equilibrium quantity here:
https://brainly.com/question/33032545
#SPJ11
In your experience, what are three barriers to implementing a
change project in the workplace?
What would you do to minimize or eliminate these barriers?
To minimize or eliminate these barriers, it is essential to create a culture that embraces change, provide strong leadership and support, and foster effective communication throughout the organization.
Resistance to change is a common barrier that arises when employees feel threatened by the proposed changes. To address this, it is important to involve employees in the change process from the beginning, providing them with a clear understanding of the reasons for the change and the benefits it will bring. By actively listening to their concerns, addressing their questions, and involving them in decision-making, their resistance can be reduced.
Lack of leadership support can hinder the success of a change project. To overcome this barrier, it is crucial to have leaders who are committed to the change and are actively involved in its implementation. Leaders should communicate the vision for change, provide resources and support, and serve as role models for embracing and driving the change. Their involvement and support will inspire and motivate employees to embrace the change.
By addressing these barriers through employee involvement, strong leadership support, and effective communication, the organization can minimize resistance, foster acceptance of change, and increase the likelihood of successful implementation of the change project.
To learn more about barriers click here : brainly.com/question/13712242
#SPJ11
When $2,500 of accounts receivable are determined to be uncollectible, which of the following should the company r the accounts using the allowance method? Multiple Choice A debit to Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts and a credit to Accounts Receivable. A debit to Bad Debt Expense and a credit to Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts. A debit to Bad Debt Expense and a credit to Accounts Receivable.
For the provided scenario the correct option is A; debit to Bad Debt Expense and a credit to Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts.
When $2,500 of accounts receivable are determined to be uncollectible, the company should record the expense associated with these uncollectible accounts. This expense is known as Bad Debt Expense.
It represents the estimated amount of accounts receivable that the company does not expect to collect.
To record the Bad Debt Expense and reduce the allowance for uncollectible accounts, the following entry should be made:
Debit: Bad Debt Expense
Credit: Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
This entry recognizes the expense and reduces the allowance for uncollectible accounts, which is a contra-asset account used to offset the accounts receivable on the balance sheet.
This reflects the estimation of uncollectible accounts and ensures that the accounts receivable balance is stated at its net realizable value.
To know more about Bad Debt Expense refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29482487#
#SPJ11
What is the role of budgets in preparing pro-forma statements?
How can positive profits still result in a negative cash-flow?
Budgets are essential for the preparation of pro-forma statements because they provide the basis for projecting the financial results of a company. A budget is a plan that outlines the financial goals of a company for a particular period of time.
Pro-forma statements are a tool that is used to project future results of a company's performance. Budgets play an important role in preparing pro-forma statements. They provide a framework for companies to manage their finances and make informed business decisions.
Budget is based on expected revenues, expenses, and cash flows for the upcoming period. By using budgets as a starting point, pro-forma statements can be prepared that project future financial results. Positive profits can result in a negative cash flow if a company's expenses exceed its revenues. In other words, a company can have positive profits on paper, but if it does not have enough cash to pay its bills, it will have negative cash-flow. This can happen if a company has too much debt or if it has invested too much in non-liquid assets, such as property or equipment. Additionally, if a company has customers who pay slowly, this can also contribute to negative cash-flow, even if the company is profitable.
For further information on Pro-Forma statements visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29869851
#SPJ11
What is the current ratio of Mr. Kim's operations if he has
Liquid Assets of $8,000
Current liabilities of $4,000
(formula Liquid Assets / Current Liabilities).
Interpret your answer
$2, meaning that for every $2 of liability, Mr. Kim has $1 liquid assets
2, meaning that for every$2 of liquid assets, Mr. Kim has $1 worth of liability
2, meaning that Mr. Kim cannot pay his upcoming bills.
In this case, Mr. Kim's operations are good since he has more current assets to cover his current liabilities.
The current ratio of Mr. Kim's operations is 2, meaning that for every $2 of liability, Mr. Kim has $1 liquid asset. The formula for calculating the current ratio is Liquid Assets / Current Liabilities. The calculation of the current ratio of Mr. Kim's operations is:Liquid Assets / Current Liabilities = $8,000 / $4,000 = 2
Assets are valuable resources that are owned or under the control of a person, group, or company. They can be physical (like real estate, machinery, stock, or money) or intangible (like intellectual property, patents, or trademarks). Assets are recorded on a company's balance sheet and are necessary for creating economic value. They indicate the financial resources at a company's disposal and add to the overall strength and value of the business. Businesses manage their assets to maximise their use, guard against damage or loss, and produce returns.
The current ratio of 2 means that Mr. Kim has $2 of current assets for every $1 of current liabilities. The current ratio is used to determine whether a company has enough short-term assets to cover its short-term obligations. A current ratio of less than 1 indicates that the company may not be able to pay its debts on time. A current ratio of greater than 1 indicates that the company has sufficient current assets to cover its current liabilities.
Therefore, in this case, Mr. Kim's operations are good since he has more current assets to cover his current liabilities.
Learn more about assets here:
https://brainly.com/question/14826727
#SPJ11
