Then number of pandas in the world is decreauing at a rate of
about 0.5% every year. If in one year there are 3000 pandas in
the world, how many will be there in 4 years? Round to the
nearest whole number.

Answer:

rotational symmetry of 60 degrees around the origin - yes

rotational symmetry of 120 degrees around the origin - yes

Step-by-step explanation:

A regular hexagon has 6 congruent angles

the the angles created on the line of symmetry are equal to 60 so the angle of rotational symmetry is 60 degrees.

The regular hexagon, like stated before, has 6 congruent angles so the order of symmetry is 6

Here is a visual from basic-matematics

Answer:

<B=24

Step-by-step explanation:

<B=x

<A=5(x+7.2)

x+5(x+7.2)=180

x+5x+36=180

6x=180-36

6x=144

x=24

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

When two angles are supplementary, the add up to 180 degrees.

Measure of angle A is 5 times the sum of the measure of angle B + 7.2.

So, we have b, and we have a.

a + b = 180

a = 5(b + 7.2)

b = ?

We input 5(b + 7.2) for a into the equation.

5(b + 7.2) + b = 180

Now we distribute the 5 and combine like terms.

5b + 36 + b = 180

6b + 36 = 180

Subtract 36 from both sides, then divide both sides by 6 to get b.

6b = 144

b = 24

The measure of angle B is 24 degrees.

#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)

Answer:

c. 80,360

Step-by-step explanation: multiply the number of cases they make each day by the amount of pastries each case contains

Answer:

5/6

Step-by-step explanation:

Because there are 6 sides, and it's saying we need a greater number than 1. And there are 5 other numbers.

Answer:

We accept the null hypothesis, that is, that the population mean is not different from 0.7.

Step-by-step explanation:

A brochure claims that the average maximum height a certain type of plant is 0.7 m.

This means that the null hypothesis is:

[tex]H_{0}: \mu = 0.7[/tex]

A gardener suspects that this estimate is not accurate locally due to soil conditions.

Hypothesis test to determine whether the population mean is different from 0.7m, which means that the alternate hypothesis is:

[tex]H_{a}: \mu \neq 0.7[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0.7 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.7[/tex]

A random sample of 43 plants is taken. The mean height of the plants in the sample is 0.65m.

This means, respectively, that [tex]n = 43, X = 0.65[/tex]

Assume that the population standard deviation is 0.2 m.

This means that [tex]\sigma = 0.2[/tex]

Value of the test statistic:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.65 - 0.7}{\frac{0.2}{\sqrt{43}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = -1.64[/tex]

Pvalue of the test:

Since we are testing that the mean is different of a value, and z is negative, the pvalue of the test is 2 multiplied by the pvalue of z = -1.64

z = -1.64 has a pvalue of 0.0505

2*0.0505 = 0.101

Using a 1% level of significance, perform a hypothesis test to determine whether the population mean is different from 0.7m.

0.101 > 0.01, which means that we accept the null hypothesis, that is, that the population mean is not different from 0.7.

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Open circle going right. <-- graphed

Step-by-step explanation:

1billion is the correct answerStep-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1st find the area of bigger rectangle ie l×b

again find area of small rectangle ie l×b

now subtract area of small rectangle by bigger one you get the area of shaded part

Answer:y=x+5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

36

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The researcher did not state that the p-value is conditional on the null hypothesis being true.

Step-by-step explanation:

The p-value or the assumed value represent the probability in which the test results that are received would be atleast extreme in that the null hypothesis would be correct

Here the wrong thing would be that researcher would not stated the p value is in conditional form based on the null hypothesis being true

Therefore the correct option is A.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(5 dollars)/(4 girls) = (5/4 dollars)/girl = (1.25 dollars)/girl

:::::

(5.52 dollars)/(4 girls) = (5.52/4 dollars)/girl = (1.38 dollars)/girl

Answer:

2/8 is the median

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: The median is 2/8

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the median is the middle number, and 2/8 is at the middle.

Answer:

umm whats the question-

help you in what man?

there is no question

Answer:

(x + 6)(x - 4)

Step-by-step explanation:

x² + 2x - 24

(x + 6)(x - 4)

-4 and +6 multiply to 24 and add to +2.

Answer:

I believe it's A=5 times 9 but since the triangle is special (3-4-5), it could be 12 times 5. Hope this kinda help :)

Answer:

yes and no a.a

Step-by-step explanation:

Car A travels the fastest on 1 gallon of gas.

The unitary method is a method for solving a problem by the first value of a single unit and then finding the value by multiplying the single value. The unitary method is a technique by which we find the value of a single unit from the value of multiple devices and the value of more than one unit from the value of a single unit. It is a method that we use for most of the calculations in math.

Given that car, the magazine reports the numbers of miles driven for different amounts of fas for Three car.

Consider us solving for the miles per gallon of individual cars

A. miles driven =140

A gallons= 5

x= 140/5

x= 28 miles per gallon

To learn more about the unitary method, please visit the link given below;

https://brainly.com/question/23423168

#SPJ5

Answer:

a) 0.0228 = 2.28% probability of a northward displacement of less than 500 kilometers

b) 0.0808 = 8.08% probability of a northward displacement of less than 500 kilometers

c) 1200 kilometers, because in this case, the will be a higher probability of a northward displacement that is less than 500 kilometers.

Step-by-step explanation:

Normal Probability Distribution:

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Standard deviation of 500 kilometers

This means that [tex]\sigma = 500[/tex]

a. Assuming the mean is 1500 kilometers, what is the probability of a northward displacement of less than 500 kilometers?

Mean of 1500 km means that [tex]\mu = 500[/tex]

The probability is the pvalue of Z when X = 500. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{500 - 1500}{500}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.0228

0.0228 = 2.28% probability of a northward displacement of less than 500 kilometers.

b. Assuming the mean is 1200 kilometers, what is the probability of a northward displacement of less than 500 kilometers?

Now [tex]\mu = 1200[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{500 - 1200}{500}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.4[/tex]

[tex]Z = -1.4[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.0808

0.0808 = 8.08% probability of a northward displacement of less than 500 kilometers.

c. If, in fact, the northward displacement is less than 500 kilometers, which is the more plausible mean, 1200 or 1500 kilometers?

1200 kilometers, because in this case, the will be a higher probability of a northward displacement that is less than 500 kilometers.

Answer:

40%

Step-by-step explanation:

Because there are 5 rectangle total, we can dive 100% into 5 parts.

Each part is then 20%, there are 2 shaded rectangles thus the answer is 40%.

Answer:

no

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello There!

We can figure out if the given side lengths form a right triangle using the Pythagorean Theorem

The Pythagorean Theorem states that the hypotenuse (longest side) squared equal to sum of the two legs squared

so if it is a right triangle then

[tex]74^2=71^+24^2[/tex]

[tex]74^2=5476\\71^2=5041\\24^2=576\\5041+576=5617\\5476\neq 5617[/tex]

5617 is not equal to 5476 therefore the given side lengths do not form a right triangle

~TheMathWIz

Answer:

No. It is not. The opposite is -5

Step-by-step explanation:

I -5 I

The symbols; | | represents absolute value.

It gives the non negative value of that number irrespective of the sign of the number.

That is;

| -a | = a and | a | = a

So in this case;

| -5 | = 5

Opposite of 5 = -5

So the answer is FALSE!

(a)

[tex]\displaystyle\int_3^\infty \frac{\mathrm dx}{x^2+9}=\lim_{b\to\infty}\int_{x=3}^{x=b}\frac{\mathrm dx}{x^2+9}[/tex]

Substitute x = 3 tan(t ) and dx = 3 sec²(t ) dt :

[tex]\displaystyle\lim_{b\to\infty}\int_{t=\arctan(1)}^{t=\arctan\left(\frac b3\right)}\frac{3\sec^2(t)}{(3\tan(t))^2+9}\,\mathrm dt=\frac13\lim_{b\to\infty}\int_{t=\arctan(1)}^{t=\arctan\left(\frac b3\right)}\mathrm dt[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle \frac13 \lim_{b\to\infty}\left(\arctan\left(\frac b3\right)-\arctan(1)\right)=\boxed{\dfrac\pi{12}}[/tex]

(b) The series

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{n=3}^\infty \frac1{n^2+9}[/tex]

converges by comparison to the convergent p-series,

[tex]\displaystyle\sum_{n=3}^\infty\frac1{n^2}[/tex]

(c) The series

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n (n^2+9)}{e^n}[/tex]

converges absolutely, since

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left|\frac{(-1)^n (n^2+9)}{e^n}\right|=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{n^2+9}{e^n} < \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{n^2}{e^n} < \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac1{e^n}=\frac1{e-1}[/tex]

That is, ∑ (-1)ⁿ (n ² + 9)/eⁿ converges absolutely because ∑ |(-1)ⁿ (n ² + 9)/eⁿ| = ∑ (n ² + 9)/eⁿ in turn converges by comparison to a geometric series.

Answer:

A,C,D,F

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

It is easy to see that (-2, 0) and (0, -4) are points on the line.

gradient = (difference of y-coordinates)/(difference of x-coordinates) = (0-(-4))/(-2-0) = 4/(-2) =  -2

Answer:

Yes it's a positive linear graph

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yes dear it's a positive linear graph.

Answer:

no of science teachers is 20

no of students is 600

ratio=20/600

=20:600

=1:30

pls give me brainliest