Answer:
sick cartoon lol
Explanation:
!!!!I NEED THE ANSWER TO THIS ASAP!!!!AND PLEASE THE RIGHT ANSWER!!!!Why are congressional committees important? *
A)They allow for more debate on a bill
B)They give experts an opportunity to give their opinions on a bill
C) They ensure the best possible bill that can be written
D) All of the above
Answer:
The answer is D, all of the above.
Explanation:
hope this helped! <3
what is an incentive?
Hello I need some help on this question because I’m overthinking that if it’s A,B,C my top three choices so please help me out on this one.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Because you should be patient
Select the correct answer.
Who are the authors of the social disorganization theory?
O A.
Marcus Felson and Lawrence Cohen
OB.
Cesare Lombroso and Enrico Ferri
O C.
Cesare Beccaria and Bentham
OD
Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay
Reset
Answer:
Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay
Explanation:
This is correct, I hope it helps! :)
Do you think it would be challenging to demonstrate compassion toward a hardened criminal, such as a serial killer? Explain.
Answer:
Yes it would.
Explanation:
A serial killer is someone who took the lives of other people basically a monster and showing compassion to monsters would be extremely difficult now wouldn't it.
Answer:
Would it be challenging for me to demonstrate ethical skills at work with a former criminal? I think I would have a hard time feeling comfortable around them, I would probably be more fearful around them rather than less compassionate. I might be afraid that they would decide to commit crimes and harm me, however I suppose if they were able to be released from prison then they must have been reformed and changed their ways for good. It would just be a case where I would slowly have to feel more comfortable around them over time. Not related but I would just like to point out that I believe in the reform process for most criminals however serial killers are an exception generally they have ASPD, most likely sociopathic disorder, which cannot be changed through any sort of methods so they shouldn’t even be released in the first place.
:P hope this helped
Explanation:
Distinguish between Offer and Mere declaration of Intention
Wilona was married to Wilbur for 40 years. She was devastated when he passed away. She had been very reliant on him and left all their business matters to him. She had always been a religious person and turned to her faith for solace.
She was visited by her local priest, Father Devout. She talked about her situation with him and concluded that she should sell her matrimonial home and move into a small unit. Father Devout was himself looking for a new home after the church had informed him that it would be selling the bungalow adjacent to the church building in which he currently lived as a cost- cutting exercise. He mentioned this fact in passing and Wilona insisted that she sell her house to him. When he asked how much she would want for the property, she said she had no idea of its worth. However, she had heard a neighbour say that a house in the street had sold for about $200,000, but, because she knew that her house would go to someone deserving, she would sell it to him for $100,000. This was in fact half its true value. She wouldn’t take no for an answer and Father Devout knew her to be someone who would obstinately insist on something once her mind was made up.
Wilona needed a bridging loan to purchase her unit. She does not trust banks and instead approached Sly, a fellow parishioner. Sly was a wealthy businessman, who told her he would give her the necessary funds if she signed a receipt for it so he ‘would have something to show the taxman’. In fact, the “receipt” was a basically-worded loan document, which provided that she was liable for interest at twice the rate that she could have obtained from a bank. Wilona signed the document without reading it because she thought Sly, as a fellow churchgoer, was “a good man”.
Wilona’s son and daughter have just flown in from their respective homes overseas and discovered what Wilona has been doing. They seek your advice on whether she can undo what she has done.
Advise Wilona’s children, discussing all available grounds for relief under Australian contract law.
Answer:whats the question
Explanation:
Answer:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
Explanation:
A party is bound by the terms of a contract once it is signed whether or not the party has read or understood the terms in a contract (L'Estrange Rule). However, a signature is not binding where it was obtained by a fraud or misrepresentation, or where document was not known to be a contract by the party signing it (absence of "Intent".).
In the given case, there is a misrepresentation by Sly as a loan document was presented to Wilona as a tax receipt. Therefore, Wilona could repudiate the terms mentioned in the document.
40. Sarah has been asked to explain the "right-to-know" law to her coworkers in the forensics lab. How will she MOST accurately explain this
law?
All lab workers must know how to operate a handgun.
Scientists are informed of any potentially dangerous materials.
Forensic scientists are told when criminals are in the building.
No scientists have to testify in a criminal case if they choose not to.
Answer:
Pretty sure its B. Sorry if I'm wrong.
Explanation:
This is the definition on Wikipedia.
"Right to know", in the context of United States workplace and community environmental law, is the legal principle that the individual has the right to know the chemicals to which they may be exposed in their daily living.
Understanding the Federal Justice System
Please choose the correct answer.
Which aspect of the federal judiciary
is specifically established in the
Constitution?
O The three-tiered structure of the
federal court system
O The Supreme Court's role as the
highest court in the land
O The number of justices serving
on the Supreme Court
The number of judges in the
entire federal court system
Answer:
O The Supreme Court's role as the
highest court in the land
Explanation:
Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it.
How did the country’s leaders respond to George Washington’s warnings against political parties?
Answer:
The county's leaders ignored Washington's warnings against political parties.
The City of Sunshine is in the process of bringing a hockey team to the area and will need land on which to build a new arena. The site has been selected and Sunshine officials have offered the homeowners a fair amount for the property where the arena is to be built. What would this action fall under?
Answer:
This action would fall under the Fifth Amendment's eminent domain.
Explanation:
Eminent domain is the legal term used to denote the deprivation of ownership of an immovable or movable property by the state, within the framework of the law and against compensation. An overriding purpose serving the common good is cited as the justification for expropriations for traffic, military and other reasons related to state tasks.
Since property is one of the basic rights in market-based democracies, expropriations are only possible there in certain legally regulated exceptional cases. Thus, in America this is reflected in the Fifth Amendment, which establishes that property can only be expropriated for public use and with due compensation.
As it relates to the US Constitution regarding Impeachment. Once the House of Representatives draws up and delivers the House approval of they're Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, can they rescind them at anytime before or during the Senates deliberation for impeachment.
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Impeachment is the official procedure of any government to remove an government official from the office if he or she is found guilty.
According to the United States' Constitution, the power of impeachment is given to the House of the Representatives and The Senate is given the power to try the impeached official.
It is the fundamental component of 'checks and balances".
Regarding the procedure of impeachment in U.S., The House of Representatives can draw up and deliver the approval of the House of the article of impeachment to the Senate, they can revoke or cancel the procedure at any time of impeachment i.e. before the process or during the process of impeachment.
Which of the following is a term for a society in which all members have
meaningful rights and opportunities to express opinions and participate in
decision-making processes?
A. Democratic society
B. Monarchical society
C. Dictatorial society
D. Aristocratic society
Answer:
A democarcy is the people for the people by the people
Explanation:
why do an increasing number of Americans, the same people who admire slender look so often featured in the media, exercise too little and eat too much?
Question 9 of 10 Which of the following is a function of accounts receivable? O A. Locating discounts and incentives O B. Monitoring outstanding invoices O C. Communicating with investors and banks D. Paying vendors for services rendered
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Monitoring outstanding invoices
What would be "justice" to you and why?
Answer:
Justice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law, natural law, religion, or equity. It is also the act of being just and/or fair.
Explanation:
Do you think it was important for congress to finish what they started?
Answer:
it depends
Explanation:
you should finish what you started, so you can achieve your goal and if you start something you dont enjoy your shouldn't continue because you would be wasting your time on things you hate than doing the things you enjoy.
if you start something you that you are bad at, always remember, a quitter never wins but a failure always win.
what incentives influence people in their decisions about exercise and diet?
Answer:
The incentives that influence decisions about exer- cise include forms of passive entertainment, like tele- vision and computer games. One incentive influenc- ing decisions about diet is the reduced cost of food.)
Explanation:
21. All bills start in a committee, but the ideas for them can begin elsewhere. Ideas for laws can
start in all of these places EXCEPT: *
NEEDED FOR A TEST ASAP
a.With the president
b.With foreign leaders
c.With regular US citizens
d.With members of Congress
Answer:
C. :)
Explanation:
Answer:
b. With foreign leaders
Explanation:
Ideas for laws that CAN start in all of these places:
c. With regular US citizens ⇒ You and I can come up with ideas for laws. In fact, most of the ideas for laws come from just regular US citizens.
d. With members of Congress ⇒ Within Congress, representatives can come up with ideas for laws to help benefit the country. Members of the House of Representatives and the Senate can both do that.
a. With the president ⇒ The president comes up with laws because he’s the one responsible for our country. So the president does still come up with ideas for laws to help with our country. But it’s not like the president gets to come up with anything he wants to and he can just sign the bill and it becomes a law. Every idea for a law always goes to Congress where the members decide if it’s good or not, including the president’s ideas.
Ideas for laws that CANNOT start in this place (the correct answer):
b. With foreign leaders ⇒ Foreign leaders are leaders that are outside of our country. That’s what foreign means: overseas, distant, away, etc. Foreign leaders can’t come with ideas for laws because there not even in/part of our country.
In case you still don’t understand:
Example: Let’s say there is a King in England (there isn’t a king in England but this is just an example). Now, does the King of England get to come up with ideas for laws for our country? Absolutly not! He’s totally from a different country, and he doesn’t have the right to be in America’s business in making laws. He deals with his own country, not ours.
Hence,
Ideas for laws can start in all of these places EXCEPT:
b. With foreign leaders
Hope this helps! :D
Tina wants to start saving for college. She heard about CDs and mutual funds, but doesn’t know which is best for her. What should Tina do?
She should set aside $100 per month to put in a savings account.
She should wait and take out a student loan.
She should become more knowledgeable by talking with a financial adviser or by taking a class.
She should try to spend less and put whatever she can in a safe place.
Answer:
she should become more knowledgeable by talking with a financial adviser pr by taking a class she should try to spend less money and put whatever she can in a safe place
Explanation:
Is a lack of norms or clear social standards. Because of rapidly shifting moral values, the individual has few guides to what is socially acceptable.
whats the question again? sorry i didnt understand. ill help you out though!
Outlines use____ to identify various levels of information. A numbers. B Roman Numerals . Cletters . Dall of these
This is from leadworthy also plss help
What are the benefits and drawbacks to giving one leader total contro2
The statement below is from a jury's decision in a court case.
"We, the jury, rule in favor of Mrs. Garcia, and order Mr. Wakefield to pay the sum of twenty thousand dollars, plus attorney fees and court costs.."
Based on the statement above, what type of case has the jury decided?
A. civil
B. criminal
C. military
D. statutory
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
The kind of case that the jury has decided would be:
A). Civil
What are the types of cases?The courts deal with a number of cases which include:
Civil CasesFamily CasesCriminal casesAs per the details provided, the given case would be characterized as a Civil Case as it is concerned with the conflicts that exist between Mrs. Garcia and Mr. Wakefield.
The decision of the court would aim to resolve this and hence, it exemplifies a civil case.
Thus, option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about "Jury" here:
brainly.com/question/20407684
Define opening statement
Answer:
An opening statement is generally the first occasion that the trier of fact has to hear from a lawyer in a trial, aside possibly from questioning during voir dire. The opening statement is generally constructed to serve as a "road map" for the fact-finder.
Explanation:
Sarah and Lucia were accepted to the same college. The two women decided to share a house during the school year. They both signed a rental contract with a landlord Alter the first semester, Sarah decided to change
schools Sarah moved out without telling Lucia Sarah also refused to pay her share of the rent to Lucia
Which type of law addresses the scenario?
A.civil law
B.military
C.criminal Law
D.constitutional
Determines in the end whether a situation is a constitutional issue or if a question is related to a decision on a constitutional issue. Decide that the president or parliament has violated a constitutional requirement. Thus, option D is correct.
What is role of constitutional law addresses the scenario?One of the main goals of the Constitution as it was created by the Convention was to establish a government with sufficient authority to act on a national level without compromising fundamental rights.
Establishes the fundamental rights of the populace that the government is not permitted to violate.
Explains the legal framework and administrative processes of the government. Acts as the fundamental and supreme law of the country and the state.
Therefore, constitutional type of law addresses the scenario.
Learn more about constitutional here:
https://brainly.com/question/14398727
#SPJ6
ASAPP!!!!!!!!
It is important to read your owner's manual so you will know what kind of brakes your vehicle has so you will know how to react in emergencies.
A. TRUE
B. FALSE
Answer: True
Explanation:
To take on the demands of firefighting and be competitive today, what are the top requirements for applicants serious about a
career in firefighting? Check all that apply:
be in excellent physical condition
be 18 years old minimum
this
have EMT experience or a four-year college degree
have 20/20 vision
Answer:
all the above, you have to be hands on and be completly sure you want to do this also because there are a lot at risk and there alot of challenges
Explanation:
What do you understand by the terms ‘Law’ in general and ‘Business law in particular’?
Answer:
Laws are binding rules that relate to the conduct of individuals and businesses and are designed to prescribe obligation or duty and enforce justice. ... Business owners must follow all regulations and laws to avoid fines. Vacationers and visitors to other countries should understand and respect local laws.
Explanation:
Business law is the law that governs what happens with commercial matters, and there are two main types: regulation of commercial entities and regulation of commercial transactions. Laws have evolved over centuries, and have had to adapt to changes in technology and society.
Which action is an example of an "implied" power? (Congress) A- Congress votes to raise income taxes B- Congress holds an investigation on women in the military C- Congress declares war on a country for sponsoring terroisim D- Congress decides to close post offices in rural areas on Saturdays
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
An implied power can be described as those powers which does not exist in the Constitution of the United States but expressly stated due to similar powers enjoyed by the Congress.
When the framers of the Constitution were drafting the document they had in mind that the needs of people will grow with the growing nation, so in Article I they gave the Congress right to excercise the power under the 'Necessary and Proper Clause.'
So, an example of implied power from the given options would be D. Congress have right to use implied power to close post offices in rural areas on Saturdays. Therefore, option D is correct.