true or false A permanent magnet and a coil of wire carrying a current both produce magnetic fields

Answer:

The correct answer is "[tex]4.49\times 10^{10} \ joules[/tex]".

Explanation:

According to the question,

The work will be:

⇒ [tex]Work=-\frac{kQq}{R}[/tex]

              [tex]=-\frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon \times (18-30)\times 3\times 0.2}[/tex]

              [tex]=-\frac{1}{4 \pi \varepsilon \times (-12)\times 3\times 0.2}[/tex]

              [tex]=\frac{0.3978}{\varepsilon }[/tex]

              [tex]=4.49\times 10^{10} \ joules[/tex]

Thus the above is the correct answer.    

We have that the workdone  is mathematically given as

W=4.49*10e10 J

From the question we are told

Generally the equation for the workdone   is mathematically given as

W=-kQq/R

Therefore

0.3978/ε0 =-1/(4πε0*(18-30)*3*0.2

Hence

For more information on Charge visit

https://brainly.com/question/9383604

Answer:

r = 20.22 m

Explanation:

Given that,

Charge,[tex]q=2.5\times 10^{-6}\ C[/tex]

Electric field, [tex]E=55\ N/C[/tex]

We need to find the distance. We know that, the electric field a distance r is as follows :

[tex]E=\dfrac{kq}{r^2}\\\\r=\sqrt{\dfrac{kq}{E}}\\\\r=\sqrt{\dfrac{9\times 10^9\times 2.5\times 10^{-6}}{55}}\\\\r=20.22\ m[/tex]

So, the required distance is 20.22 m.

Explanation:

[tex]\underline{\boxed{\large{\bf{Option \; A!! }}}} [/tex]

Here,

We have to find the equivalent resistance of the circuit.

Here, [tex]\rm { R_1} [/tex] and [tex]\rm { R_2} [/tex] are connected in series, so their combined resistance will be given by,

[tex]\longrightarrow \rm { R_{(1,2)} = R_1 + R_2} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \rm { R_{(1,2)} = (2 + 2) \; Omega} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \rm { R_{(1,2)} = 4 \; Omega} \\ [/tex]

Now, the combined resistance of [tex]\rm { R_1} [/tex] and [tex]\rm { R_2} [/tex] is connected in parallel combination with [tex]\rm { R_3} [/tex], so their combined resistance will be given by,

[tex]\longrightarrow \rm {\dfrac{1}{ R_{(1,2,3)}} = \dfrac{1}{R_{(1,2)}} + \dfrac{1}{R_3} } \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \rm {\dfrac{1}{ R_{(1,2,3)}} = \Bigg ( \dfrac{1}{4} + \dfrac{1}{2} \Bigg ) \;\Omega} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \rm {\dfrac{1}{ R_{(1,2,3)}} = \Bigg ( \dfrac{1 + 2}{4} \Bigg ) \;\Omega} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \rm {\dfrac{1}{ R_{(1,2,3)}} = \Bigg ( \dfrac{3}{4} \Bigg ) \;\Omega} \\ [/tex]

Reciprocating both sides,

[tex]\longrightarrow \rm {R_{(1,2,3)}= \dfrac{4}{3} \;\Omega} \\ [/tex]

Now, the combined resistance of [tex]\rm { R_1} [/tex], [tex]\rm { R_2} [/tex] and [tex]\rm { R_3} [/tex] is connected in series combination with [tex]\rm { R_4} [/tex]. So, equivalent resistance will be given by,

[tex]\longrightarrow \rm {R_{(1,2,3,4)}= R_{(1,2,3)} + R_4} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \rm {R_{(1,2,3,4)}= \Bigg ( \dfrac{4}{3} + 2 \Bigg ) \; \Omega} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \rm {R_{(1,2,3,4)}= \Bigg ( \dfrac{4 + 6}{3} \Bigg ) \; \Omega} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \rm {R_{(1,2,3,4)}= \Bigg ( \dfrac{10}{3} \Bigg ) \; \Omega} \\ [/tex]

[tex]\longrightarrow \bf {R_{(1,2,3,4)}= 3.33 \; \Omega} \\ [/tex]

Henceforth, Option A is correct.

[tex]\underline{\boxed{\large{\bf{Option \; B!! }}}} [/tex]

Here, we have to find the amount of flow of current in the circuit. By using ohm's law,

[tex] \longrightarrow [/tex] V = IR

[tex] \longrightarrow [/tex] 3 = I × 3.33

[tex] \longrightarrow [/tex] 3 ÷ 3.33 = I

[tex] \longrightarrow [/tex] 0.90 Ampere = I

Henceforth, Option B is correct.

[tex] \tt \purple{Hope \; it \; helps \; you, Army! \heartsuit } \\ [/tex]

Answer:

Explanation:

Apply law of conservation of momentum along y-axis.

Initially there was no momentum along y-axis. So there will be nil momentum along y-axis again finally.

Let the mass of each piece after breaking be m .

Momentum of piece moving along positive y-axis

= m x 10 = 10m .

Let the component of velocity of third piece along y-axis be v .

Its momentum along the same direction = m v .

Total momentum along y -axis = 10 m + m v

According to law of conservation of momentum

10 m + mv = 0

v = - 10 m/s .

Component of velocity of the third piece along y-axis will be - 10 m/s .

In other words it will be along negative y-axis with speed of 10 m/s.

Answer:

Your fart only has so much force, not nearly enough to launch you into oblivion. Your fart and you still exert a force onto each other, so I guess, hypothetically, you could fly if you really, really try hard enough. Just make sure you don't try too hard and prolapse as a result :)

Answer:

The static and kinetic coefficients of friction are 0.273 and 0.181, respectively.

Explanation:

By Newton's Laws of Motion and definition of maximum friction force, we derive the following two formulas for the static and kinetic coefficients of friction:

[tex]\mu_{s} = \frac{f_{s}}{m\cdot g}[/tex] (1)

[tex]\mu_{k} = \frac{f_{k}}{m\cdot g}[/tex] (2)

Where:

[tex]\mu_{s}[/tex] - Static coefficient of friction, no unit.

[tex]\mu_{k}[/tex] - Kinetic coefficient of friction, no unit.

[tex]f_{s}[/tex] - Static friction force, in newtons.

[tex]f_{k}[/tex] - Kinetic friction force, in newtons.

[tex]m[/tex] - Mass, in kilograms.

[tex]g[/tex] - Gravitational constant, in meters per square second.

If we know that [tex]f_{s} = 83\,N[/tex], [tex]f_{k} = 55\,N[/tex], [tex]m = 31\,kg[/tex] and [tex]g = 9.807\,\frac{m}{s^{2}}[/tex], then the coefficients of friction are, respectively:

[tex]\mu_{s} = \frac{83\,N}{(31\,kg)\cdot \left(9.807\,\frac{m}{s^{2}} \right)}[/tex]

[tex]\mu_{s} = 0.273[/tex]

[tex]\mu_{k} = \frac{55\,N}{(31\,kg)\cdot \left(9.807\,\frac{m}{s^{2}} \right)}[/tex]

[tex]\mu_{k} = 0.181[/tex]

The static and kinetic coefficients of friction are 0.273 and 0.181, respectively.

Answer:

Correct option not indicated

Explanation:

There are few mistakes in the question. The angular velocity ought to have been denoted with "ω" and not "o" (as also suggested in the options).

The formula to calculate a centripetal force (F) is

F = mv²/r

Where m is mass, v is velocity and r is radius

where

While the formula to calculate a centrifugal force (F) is

F = mω²r

where m is mass, ω is angular velocity and r is radius of the circular path.

From the above, it can be denoted that the relationship been referred to in the question is that of a centrifugal force and not centripetal force, thus the correct option should be C.

NOTE: Centripetal force is the force required to keep an object moving in a circular path/motion and acts inward towards the centre of rotation while centrifugal force is the force felt by an object in circular motion which acts outward away from the centre of rotation.

Answer:

The frequency of the second wave is half of the frequency of first one.

Explanation:

The wavelength of the second wave is double is the first wave.

As we know that the frequency is inversely proportional to the wavelength of the velocity is same.

velocity = frequency x wavelength

So, the ratio of frequency of second wave to the first wave is

[tex]\frac{f_2}{f_1} =\frac{\lambda _1}{\lambda _2}\\\\\frac{f_2}{f_1} =\frac{\lambda _1}{2\lambda _1}\\\\\frac{f_2}{f_1} =\frac{1}{2}\\\\[/tex]

The frequency of the second wave is half of the frequency of first one.