What did the Pacific Railroad Act of 1862 do? Check all of the boxes that apply.

Answer:

A stronger state with a weaker national government

Explanation:

Just look at history, when the national government has too much power things get bad. This is why there systems such as checks and balances in the U.S government so the power is shared, one branch doesn't have power over the other two. This keeps the national government in the hands of the people and not dictators.  

Facism Leader ~~~~A facist state is led by a strong leader such as a dictator and a martial law government composed of the memeber of the governing facist party to forge national unity and maintain a stable and orderly society

Answer:

un activista, intelectual, escritor, estadista argentino y el séptimo presidente de Argentina

Explanation:

Explanation:

congress could not agree the location for the rail line

Answer:

they lost the land that they just paid for and weren't allowed to enter it

Explanation:

it made lines accross the appalacian mountains where colonists were restricted to go because of fear of more indian intervention and not having the money to support another attack

Answer:

[I]n the state context, I think there's a relatively easy way to do this—have fewer legislators! At the national level, we have a bicameral legislature because of the overall workings of the federal system. But the non-Nebraska states have bicameral legislatures for no real reason. If you simply eliminated the lower houses, you'd end up with substantially fewer state legislators. Then you could pay them more and offer them more staff. It'd also be easier for citizens to keep track of who their elected officials actually are (can you name who represents you in your state legislature?) and make the electoral competition for the seats more fearsome.

Open question: why do states have two chambers? (Seriously).

The U.S. Senate is the product of a compromise between the states. Why do states need to emulate that model? Going back even futher, do we want to follow the lead of a parliamentary system where 1/2 of the leadership was traditionally filled because of birthright? I'm a big fan of the U.S. Senate. I just don't get why there needs to be a New York Senate.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Piano Essay Research paper

Explanation:

The piano when invented changed the way music was written, and even created new forms of music. Its invention ushered in new eras and gave people a sense of worth. But this change did not take place overnight, it took many years of hard work and labor to achieve what the piano is today.

The History of the Piano

   In 1698 a man named Bartolomeo Cristofori began to design an instrument, which would play both loudness and softness and be able to use an excellent range of dynamics unlike the popular instrument of the day the harpsichord. For years he worked on the instrument that would not only take over the harpsichord?s place in music, but also change how music was written and composed. Maybe one of the most influential instruments we will ever know. In 1709 he finally finished this instrument and named it the gravicembalo col piano e forte (harpsichord with loudness or softness), which was later know, as the pianoforte. This was the first instrument in which composers could effectively display their emotions.

     Cristofori faced many problems in the creation of he piano. First he developed a system in which the player could to only hit one of the two strings for each note (una corda). He also developed an effective mechanism to use downward pressure (striking the key) and make it project the hammer towards the strings. He also had to time the hammer?s striking the key directly proportionate to when the sound should be heard, with this improvement came another which is vital to the pianos inner workings, the escapement. The escapement is a device that lets the hammer strike the string and leave the string free to vibrate. The hammer is made to fall back and let the string vibrate, when the player let go of the key a damper would then fall on the string stopping the sound. Though Cristofori?s pianos were softer than the harpsichord they still had a much wider dynamic range. Cristofori produced his earliest surviving piano in 1720, and his last in 1726, 5 years later he dies in 1731.

Once news got around that Cristofori has designed the piano many instrument makers began building pianos. The organ builder Gottfried Silbermann (who developed the prellmechanik-rebound rail) built a piano and showed it to Bach who did not like it because the high notes were poor and the keys too heavy. So Slibermann redesigned his piano and got a much more pleasing result from Bach.

As the seven-year war purged Germany of its musical minds, so the French revolution drove those in France to England, which by now was the piano production capital of the world. One French piano maker, Sebastien Erard contributed enormously to the construction of the piano. The first was his double escapement which allowed a key to be played twice in a row without fully releasing the key. Making the note quick and easy to play(Later improved by Henri Herz). This, when applied to the grand piano, helped his company (the Erard Company) to compete with other companies such as ; Cleminti( collard and collard), Tompkinson and Broadwood.

With the rise of the Romantic Movement in the 19th century the piano endured much wear and tear, composers would go through one piano each performance because the strings would snap and many other problems would arise. So a solution had to be found. It soon came from Broadwood, who developed a way for the tension to be released from the strings by putting iron spacers between the pin block and the belly rail where the high plate is attached. But that did not totally solve the problem. Overstringing, invented by Steinway and sons, also helped. This was done by running bass strings diagonally over treble strings.

How the piano is made

Strings This is the part of the piano in which controls volume and the strength of the piano. The strings are chosen wisely by the maker, either thick for strength or thin for high pitch. The main thing they must always remember is that the strings are withstanding up to 30 tons of pressure. The strings therefore are usually made of carbon steel and are thick or thin according to the level of pitched.

After all the piano has gone through people are still trying to improve it, I personally think that it is at its peak and anything electronic would only take away from the classical skill and craftsmanship which is required to build it. There will always be a demand for the traditional high quality classical style of the piano, but that is only a part of the market as sales of pianos shrink manufacturers are bound to experiment with bolder designs. Many will dismiss these as gimmicks, but if they stimulate interests and sales they are helping to secure the instruments future.

Hope this helps!! =3

c. The mass production of steel reduced its price and led to its use in many industries

Answer:

Political and Economic Changes during the American Occupation of Japan

At the point when the conflict finished, it was the basic goal of the multitude of Allied Powers to deliver Japan unequipped for truly getting back to the field of fight. "Disarmament" was in this manner the main arrangement of the Occupation specialists and was joined by canceling Japan's military, destroying its tactical industry, and taking out the outflow of energy from its schools and public life.  In any case, the American government, which had driven the Allied conflict exertion and whose delegate, General Douglas MacArthur, was named the Supreme Commander of the Occupation powers, felt that solitary a majority rule Japan would be really harmony cherishing. It was expected that majority rule nations like the United States and Great Britain were more tranquil than nondemocratic nations like Hitler's Germany and prewar Japan under the sovereign. Be that as it may, what makes a nation "majority rule"? Is a country majority rule essentially as a result of certain political foundations, similar to free decisions and free discourse? Can these political foundations endure if financial force is moved in only a couple hands, and social constructions like the instructive framework and the family lecture limitless dutifulness to power?  

The American government accepted that building up vote based system in Japan included change in every aspect of Japanese life. Under MacArthur and with the participation of the Japanese, Japan embraced gigantic changes in only seven brief years — the Occupation endured from 1945 to 1952. The achievement of the Occupation can be decided by the way that forty years after the fact, Japan has not battled a conflict, is a nearby partner of the United States, and has not changed the vast majority of the significant changes made by the Occupation.  

Political Changes  

The most clear changes were political. During the Occupation, Japan received another constitution (here and there called the MacArthur Constitution in light of the significant job Americans played in its drafting). This constitution was totally not the same as the Meiji Constitution of 1889.  The greatest change was that it announced that sway rested with individuals, not the sovereign. This is the political premise of majority rule government.  The ruler was to proceed as an image of Japanese solidarity and culture, to some degree like the Queen of England in Britain's majority rule government, however with no political authority at all.  The preeminent political establishment was presently to be Japan's parliament, the Diet, which was to be comprised of uninhibitedly chose agents of individuals.  Ladies were given equivalent rights under the new constitution, including the option to cast a ballot.  Neighborhood governments were fortified to empower "grass-roots level" political investment.  The constitution set up numerous new polite freedoms, like the privilege of free discourse, and the forces of the police were debilitated and painstakingly directed.  At last, the tactical powers were totally annulled and Article 9 of the new constitution disallowed Japan to keep a military or do battle until kingdom come.  

Monetary Changes

To help these political changes, the Americans initiated changes to make financial force in Japan more "vote based." In prewar Japan, 66% of the horticultural land was leased, not possessed, by the ranchers who cultivated it. The ranchers, who made up more than 50% of the workforce, frequently leased the land from landowners who lived in far off urban communities and paid them however much 50% of the harvests they developed. Since the normal "ranch" was minimal in excess of a section of land, many homestead families lived in destitution. The land change removed land from enormous property managers and reallocated it to the ranchers, so that ranch families could possess the land they worked. Since ranch families turned out to be more autonomous financially, they could take an interest all the more uninhibitedly in the new popular government.  The Americans additionally attempted to make laborers in the mechanical area more autonomous by changing the laws to permit deregulation associations. Prior to the conflict there were a couple of little associations; by 1949, about portion of all mechanical specialists had a place with an association.  To democratize financial force further and make contest, the Occupation planned to separate the monster business enterprises, the zaibatsu, yet this change was not carried out, partially on the grounds that it would have made Japan's monetary recuperation more troublesome.  

Answer:

B

Explanation:

ans.

The Treaty of Portsmouth formally ended the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–05. The negotiations took place in August in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, and were brokered in part by U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt.

#CarryOnLearning

Answer:

C. it is believed to provide a common sense of destiny for all black Africans.

Explanation:

Pan-Africanism is a movement that has its aim to unite and strengthen the different groups of Africans in diaspora and at home. This is founded on the belief that unity is important to all spheres of life and that of the African man is no exception.

The Negritude Movement had similar views and outlook as they sought to bring the African man together.

However, one exception to their belief was the belief that it was to provide a common sense of destiny for all black Africans.

Answer:

white rich men I mean it's the truth

The US government was not happy because the 'big industries' were making more money, which led to having more power and the government was losing control economically.

America's economy grew by 42% during the 1920s. Every household received new consumer goods as a result of mass production. The modern automobile and airline industries were created. The United States' victory in World War I provided the country with its first taste of being a global power.

The economy began to shift from being driven by large industries to being driven by consumer dollars in the 1920s. Business leaders sought to thwart worker radicalism by providing new benefits, a form of welfare capitalism that contributed to a decline in union membership.

Therefore, during the 1920s, the government helped business grow, but did not regulate them at all.

To learn more about Roaring 20s, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29867338

#SPJ2

Answer:

why am i alive

Explanation:

is it for the reason to help others

Answer:it was a total war

Explanation:World War I was a total war that involved the governments, economies and populations of participating nations. This was different from the way all the other 'smaller' wars, like the Crimean War (1853-56) and late-19th-century colonial wars, had been fought.

Answer:

it was a total war

Explanation:It was

Answer:

A

Explanation:

art began in caveman times then throughout the years it has advanced

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:

2. system of laws used in countries that came under French control in the 1800s

Explanation:

The purpose of the Napoleonic Code was to reform to french legal system. Many countries occupied during Napoleonic Wars used it, and it spread across the continent.

Answer:

The answer is that the victory gave the Union complete control of the Mississippi River.  

Explanation:

Vicksburg’s strategic location on the Mississippi River made it a critical win for both the Union and the Confederacy. The Confederate surrender there ensured Union control of the Mississippi River and cleaved the South in two.

The Siege of Vicksburg (May 18, 1863-July 4, 1863) was a decisive Union victory during the American Civil War (1861-65) that divided the confederacy and cemented the reputation of Union General Ulysses S. Grant (1822-85). Union forces waged a campaign to take the Confederate stronghold of Vicksburg, Mississippi, which lay on the east bank of the Mississippi River, halfway between Memphis to the north and New Orleans to the south. The 47-day siege gave control of the Mississippi River to the Union, a critical supply line, and was part of the Union’s Anaconda Plan to cut off outside trade to the Confederacy.  

The Mississippi River was the primary conduit for supplies and communication through the south as well as a vital lifeline for goods going north. To Confederate President Jefferson Davis, Vicksburg was the "nailhead that holds the South's two halves together."

The correct answer is B) Native Americans were continually pushed westward onto the poorest lands for hunting and farming.

A result of the interaction between European settlers and Native Americans was "Native Americans were continually pushed westward onto the poorest lands for hunting and farming."

The relationship between Native American Indians and European settlers -mainly the English ones- always was of friction. confrontation, and fight.

White settlers wanted more and, more land to settle in and make it work in order to get a profit.

On the other hand, Native American Indians saw nature and land with so much respect. Never as a position, but a relationship with Mother Earth that provided food, water, and shelter. That is why native Indians honored the earth through chants and dances.

Time passed by and presidents like Andrew Jackson encouraged westward expansion and settlement by supporting the Indian Removal Act.

On May 28, 1830, United States President Andrew Jackson signed the famous Indian Removal Act that supported the westward expansion and invited many Americans to settle territories in the west. These were territories west of the Mississippi, and the President could grant lands in exchange for Native American Indian tribes' lands that already existed within the known US territory.

Answer:

People who made more money pay a higher percentage in taxes.

Explanation:

As part of the Omaha Platform, the People’s Party demanded a national currency, safe, sound, and flexible, issued by the general government only, a full legal tender for all debts, public and private, and that without the use of banking corporations, a just, equitable, and efficient means of distribution direct to the people, at a tax not to exceed 2 per cent.

The Omaha Platform proposed a progressive income tax, a secret ballot, a direct election of senators for the United States, an eight-hour workday, and other reforms.

The primary objective of the Omaha Platform was to expand coinage at a 16:1 ratio of silver and gold. The Omaha Platform proposed a federal lending program to help farmers obtain the funding they required. Private banks were likewise to be abolished, according to the plan.

The so-called Omaha Platform, which contained suggestions for the graduated income tax, secret ballot, direct election of United States senators, the eight-hour day, and other reform initiatives, was approved by the party along with the nomination of James K. Weaver for president.

Therefore, The People’s Party demanded a national currency, safe, sound, and flexible, and issued by the general government.

Learn more about Omaha platform, here;

https://brainly.com/question/30505645

#SPJ7

Answer:

D. Being undemocratic

Explanation:

Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) was an American politician and statesman who was elected as the 32nd President of the United States of America in 1933. He was born on the 30th of January, 1882 in Hyde Park, New York, United States of America.

The "Sixty Families" is a book that was authored by American journalist Ferdinand Lundberg and it was published by Vanguard Press in 1937. In this book, Ferdinand Lundberg argued about wealth and class in relation with American citizens, and how they are being leveraged upon for political and economic benefits, power or authority. He extensively talked about the tightly interlinked group of 60 families in the United States of America and tagged them as a plutocratic circle. Some of the names of the members of the “Sixty Families” included Ford, Rockefeller, Mellon, Morgan, Whitney, Vanderbilt, Guggenheim, Astor, Du Pont, and several others whose wealth was familial or acquired through dynastic properties.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) accused the “Sixty Families” of being undemocratic and were responsible for engineering the Great Depression.

The Great Depression was a period of severe economic meltdown or downturn (crisis) of the industrialized world and it started from the United States of America, typically lasting for about ten years (1929-139).

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer:

The law of conservation of energy states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed - only converted from one form of energy to another.

Hope it helps u

Please mark as the brainliest

Thank You

Answer: 1095

Explanation:

hon you have a cute korean on your profile pic i'm sure you can find the similarities and differences ;) u are smart come on.

The social contract was interpreted differently by John Locke and Thomas Hobbes in that, Locke argued that people have the right to overthrow governments that violate their rights.

The social contract, according to Locke and Hobbes, was an agreement made by individuals to establish a government. But according to Locke, a government can only be considered legitimate if,

It upholds a person's inherent rights, such as their right to life, liberty, and property. People have the right to overturn governments that violate these rights. Hobbes, on the other hand, held the view that the people had no right to remove the government since it had total control over them.

Therefore, The primary distinction between Thomas Hobbes' and John Locke's conceptions of the social contract is that Locke thought that people had the right to overturn governments that infringed their rights, whereas Hobbes thought that the government had unrestricted authority over the populace.

Learn more about social contract, here:

https://brainly.com/question/18597938

#SPJ4