what is the answered


pp lssss answer

Answer:

The Probability would be 2.78%

Step-by-step explanation: Hope this helps :)

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  it depends on the accuracy and resolution required of the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

The shaded portion appears to be about half the length of the unshaded portion, suggesting the shaded amount is 1/3.

__

Using a pair of dividers, one could determine the number of times the shaded portion fits into the whole bar. Depending on how much is left over, the process could repeat to determine the approximate size of the remaining fraction relative to the bar or to the shaded portion. (Alternatively, one could replicate the length of the bar to see what integer number of shaded lengths fit into what integer number of whole lengths.)

One could measure the shaded part and the whole bar with a ruler, then determine the relative size of the shaded part by dividing the first measurement by the second. The finer the divisions on the ruler, the better the approximation will be.

Answer:

The appropriate answer is "$12".

Step-by-step explanation:

As per the question,

Price per ticket,

= [tex]4+k[/tex]

Number of people,

= [tex]1800-90k[/tex]

Now,

The revenue (R) will be:

= [tex]Price \ per \ ticket\times Number \ of \ people[/tex]

By putting the values, we get

= [tex](4+k) (1800-9k)[/tex]

= [tex]-90k^2+1440k+7200[/tex]

or,

⇒ [tex]R'=1440-180k=0[/tex]

⇒                     [tex]180k=1440[/tex]

⇒                          [tex]k=\frac{1440}{180}[/tex]

                               [tex]=8[/tex]

hence,

The ticket price will be:

= [tex]4+k[/tex]

= [tex]4+8[/tex]

= [tex]12[/tex] ($)

Step-by-step explanation:

x⁴(4x+1)

4x⁵+x⁴

degree is 5

Answer:

a. there could be a problem of high error

b. randomized block design can remove the issue of heterogeneity

c. yes they should

d, yes it could

Step-by-step explanation:

a. if their is a lack of homogeneity among the sample population, then the results that would be obtained are going to be with increased experimental error.

b. given the number of treatment, the randomized block design technique can be done. This would then remove the issue of heterogeneity. It also gives more information and the results from the test are easier. Even in the presence of missing data, the missing plot technique can be employed.

c. when a control group is used, it makes easier the examination of the market research in a more effective way.

d. Yes it could be a double blind one. This would help to take away the problem of bias.

Answer: Choice D

9, 30, 93, 282, 849

============================================================

Explanation:

The notation [tex]a_1 = 9[/tex] tells us that the first term is 9

The notation [tex]a_n = 3*(a_{n-1})+3[/tex] says that we multiply the (n-1)st term by 3, then add on 3 to get the nth term [tex]a_n[/tex]

So if we wanted the second term for instance, then we'd say

[tex]a_n = 3*(a_{n-1})+3\\\\a_2 = 3*(a_{2-1})+3\\\\a_2 = 3*(a_{1})+3\\\\a_2 = 3*(9)+3\\\\a_2 = 27+3\\\\a_2 = 30\\\\[/tex]

If we want the third term, then,

[tex]a_n = 3*(a_{n-1})+3\\\\a_3 = 3*(a_{3-1})+3\\\\a_3 = 3*(a_{2})+3\\\\a_3 = 3*(30)+3\\\\a_3 = 90+3\\\\a_3 = 93\\\\[/tex]

and so on.

The terms so far are: 9, 30, 93

You should find the fourth and fifth terms are 282 and 849 respectively if you keep this pattern going.

Therefore, the answer is choice D

Given:

A fair die is rolled.

It pays off $10 for 6, $7 for a 5, $4  for a 4 and no payoff otherwise.

To find:

The expected winning for this game.

Solution:

If a die is rolled then the possible outcomes are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

The probability of getting a 6 is:

[tex]P(6)=\dfrac{1}{6}[/tex]

The probability of getting a 5 is:

[tex]P(5)=\dfrac{1}{6}[/tex]

The probability of getting a 4 is:

[tex]P(4)=\dfrac{1}{6}[/tex]

The probability of getting other numbers (1,2,3) is:

[tex]P(\text{Otherwise})=\dfrac{3}{6}[/tex]

[tex]P(\text{Otherwise})=\dfrac{1}{2}[/tex]

We need to find the sum of product of payoff and their corresponding probabilities to find the expected winning for this game.

[tex]E(x)=10\times P(6)+7\times P(5)+4\times P(4)+0\times P(\text{Otherwise})[/tex]

[tex]E(x)=10\times \dfrac{1}{6}+7\times \dfrac{1}{6}+4\times \dfrac{1}{6}+0\times \dfrac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]E(x)=\dfrac{10}{6}+\dfrac{7}{6}+\dfrac{4}{6}+0[/tex]

[tex]E(x)=\dfrac{10+7+4}{6}[/tex]

[tex]E(x)=\dfrac{21}{6}[/tex]

[tex]E(x)=3.5[/tex]

Therefore, the expected winnings for this game are $3.50.

Answer:

3

Step-by-step explanation:

Numbers between 21 and 30 divisible by 3 are 24 and 27. so you get the HCF of the two.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A + B = 750

A = 1.5 B

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

750-B = 1.5 B

750 = 1.5 B + B

750 = B(1.5 +1)

750 = B (2.5)

B = 300

A = 450

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation

Answer:

the answer is c

Step-by-step explanation:

distributive property

Answer:

se supone que debes usar el SINE RATIO ya que se trata del lado opuesto y la hipotenusa.

To express the phrase "Three times a number, decreased by five" as an algebraic expression, we can use the variable x to represent the unknown number: 3x - 5

Now, let's simplify this expression: Given that the unknown number is represented by x, we can substitute it into the expression above. Substituting x into the expression, we have: [tex]3(x) - 5 3x - 5[/tex] Therefore, the algebraic expression representing "Three times a number, decreased by five" is [tex]3x - 5.[/tex] At this point, there is no further simplification possible since the expression is already in its simplest form.

For example, let's assume the unknown number x is 7. We can plug in this value to evaluate the expression: [tex]3(7) - 5 = 21 - 5 = 16[/tex] Similarly, if x is -2, the calculation would be: [tex]3(-2) - 5 = -6 - 5 = -11[/tex] In conclusion, the algebraic expression 3x - 5 represents the phrase "Three times a number, decreased by five."

To know more about algebraic expression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ2

Answer:

I would say 100 since 256.78 is closer to 100 then 1000 or 10

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

No, you cannot have a negative distance.

Step-by-step explanation:

No, you cannot have a negative distance.

Let's say you were asked for the absolute value of -4. How many units is -4 away from 0? The answer would be 4. There is no negative distance from 0.

Hope this helps, please mark brainliest! :)

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of the line in slope-intercept form is y= 4x+0

The equation of a straight line in the form y = mx + b where m is the slope of the line and b is its y-intercept.

slope m,

= y2-y1/x2-x1

= 16-0/4-0

=16/4

=4

m=4

So, the equation will be , y= 4x+0

Learn more about slope- intercept here:

https://brainly.com/question/12763756

#SPJ2

Answer:

3:1

Step-by-step explanation:

90:30 simplified is 3:1

Given:

The given statements are:

[tex]p:2x=16[/tex]

[tex]q:3x-4=20[/tex]

To find:

The converse of [tex]p\to q[/tex].

Solution:

The statement [tex]p\to q[/tex] means if p, then q and the converse of this statement is [tex]q\to p[/tex].

[tex]q\to p[/tex] means if q , then p.

We have, [tex]p:2x=16[/tex] and [tex]q:3x-4=20[/tex].

So, the converse of given statement is:

[tex]q\to p:[/tex] If [tex]3x-4=20[/tex], then [tex]2x=16[/tex].

Therefore, the correct option is D.

Answer: Therefore, the correct option is D.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

p: 2x = 16

q: 3x – 4 = 20

RE

Which is the converse of p - q?

ООО

If 2x + 16, then 3x - 47 20.

If 3x - 420, then 2x + 16.

If 2x = 16, then 3x – 4 = 20.

If 3x - 4 = 20, then 2x = 16

To find:

The converse of .

Solution:

The statement  means if p, then q and the converse of this statement is .

means if q , then p.

We have,  and .

So, the converse of given statement is:

If , then .

Therefore, the correct option is D.

Answer:

1. -4

Answer:

Question 1 = 256

Question 2 = ( 7, 8, 12)

Неоднородное ДУ второго порядка. Детали в аттаче.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

tan(30) = x/1

sqrt(3) / 3 = x/1

x= sqrt(3) / 2

Answer:

B. -oo < x < 3

Step-by-step explanation:

since the vertex (3, -1), so, x should be less than 3

-oo < x < 3

Answer:

That result implies that t(s) is in the acceptance region for H₀ then we accept H₀, there is not statistics difference between the LL team and the national average

Step-by-step explanation:

The National average number of runs scored by a LL team is

μ   =  5.7

Sample Information:

size sample   n = 5

sample average   x  =  7.4

sample standard deviation    s  =  2.88

Is required to investigate if  that sample average is statistically different from the National average

We will do a test with 95 % of confidence Interval that means

significance level α = 5 %   or α = 0.05.

The sample size is 5 then even when we assume normal distribution the sample size indicates that we need to use t-student distribution. Furthermore, as the question is if the sample average is different from the national the test will be a two-tail test.

Then  α = 0.05    α/2  =  0.025

df  =  n  -  1     df  =  5  -  1     df  =  4

Then from t-student table we get  t(c)  =  2.132

Hypothesis test:

Null Hypothesis                                  H₀              x  =  μ

Alternative Hypothesis                      Hₐ              x  ≠  μ

To calculate t (s)

t(s)  = ( x  -   μ ) / s/√n

t(s)  = ( 7.4  -  5.7  )* 2.24 / 2.88

t(s)  =  1.7* 2.24 / 2.88

t(s)  = 1.32

Comparing  t(s)  and  t(c)

1.32 < 2.132

That result implies that t(s) is in the acceptance region for H₀ then we accept H₀, there is not statistics difference between the LL team and the national average

Answer:

in 1st his wife selected 80 mangoes 50 ripe and 20 unripe how it can be

Step-by-step explanation:

50+20=70 not 80

please share the correct question than I may help you

Answer:

105 in³

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume of triangular prism = base area * height

here

base area =  (10*7)/2 = 35

height = 3

Volume = 35* 3 = 105

Answer:

a. ∆EGF ≅ ∆EGD

Step-by-step explanation:

Congruent triangles would have the same side lengths and the same measure of angles.

From the figure given:

EG in ∆EGF ≅ EG in ∆EGD

GF in ∆EGF ≅ GD in ∆EGD, also

EF ≅ ED.

The three angles in ∆EFG are also congruent to the three angles in ∆EGD.

Therefore, ∆EGD is congruent to ∆EGF.

∆EGF ≅ ∆EGD

Answer:

40

Step-by-step explanation:

As the lawn size increases by 4 the weight increases by 8

Answer:

1. 33km

2. 1.2ft

3. 16in

4. 20.1ft

5. 7.2yd

6. 38mi

Step-by-step explanation:

1. 10+11+12=33km

2. 1/2(1.8+0.6)1=1.2ft

3. 5+5+3+3=16in

4. 4.1+2.7+5.4+7.9=20.1ft

5. 1.8+1.8+1.8+1.8=7.2yd

6. 12+7+12+7=38mi

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the direct variation equation, y = kx.

Replace y with t, and replace x with s:

y = kx

t = ks

Plug in 260 as k and 65 as s, then solve for k (the constant of variation):

t = ks

260 = k(65)

4 = k

So, the constant of variation is 4.