How did the Industrial Revolution affect family life in the North? Responses It resulted in higher wages and a higher standard of living. It resulted in higher wages and a higher standard of living. It largely ended the practice of families working together in the same business. It largely ended the practice of families working together in the same business. It led to increased access to healthcare. It led to increased access to healthcare. It caused the influence of the father on the children to increase.
The Industrial Revolution had a significant impact on family life in the North
It resulted in higher wages and a higher standard of livingHow the Industrial Revolution affect family life in the NorthHigher wages and a higher standard of living: The Industrial Revolution created new job opportunities in factories, mines, and mills. This led to higher wages for many workers and improved their living standards. With more money, families could afford better food, clothing, and housing.
End of the family business: Before the Industrial Revolution, many families worked together in cottage industries, such as weaving, spinning, or shoemaking. However, as factories emerged, the practice of families working together declined. Instead, family members often worked in different factories, which meant less time spent together.
Learn more about Industrial Revolution at:
https://brainly.com/question/546336
#SPJ1
What made it difficult for the German invasion of Europe to be stopped during World War II? Germany Bombs and Torpedo Germany Powerful U-boats German Air Strikes and Fast Moving Ground Forces Sea Attack Germany Fast Moving and Powerful Naval
powerful bombings, effective U-boats, coordinated air and ground attacks, successful naval warfare, and fast-moving and powerful German forces made it difficult for the German invasion of Europe to be stopped during World War II
The factors include:
1. German bombings and torpedo attacks: The Germans were able to inflict significant damage on enemy infrastructure and forces using their powerful bombs and torpedoes, which weakened the resistance against the invasion.
2. Powerful U-boats: Germany's U-boat fleet was highly effective in disrupting the supply lines of the Allied forces, making it harder for them to maintain a strong defense against the German invasion.
3. German air strikes and fast-moving ground forces: The German military used coordinated air and ground attacks to quickly and efficiently conquer territory, making it difficult for the Allies to respond in a timely manner.
4. Sea attack: The German navy was able to successfully engage in naval warfare, further complicating the defense efforts of the Allies.
5. Fast-moving and powerful German naval forces: The German navy was able to quickly mobilize and project power in various areas of Europe, making it difficult for the Allies to defend against multiple fronts simultaneously.
Therefore, the difficulty in stopping the German invasion of Europe during World War II was due to a combination of factors including powerful bombings, effective U-boats, coordinated air and ground attacks, successful naval warfare, and fast-moving and powerful German forces.
To know more about German invasion click here:
https://brainly.com/question/11065075
#SPJ11
4. This cause of WWI arose from countries joining together for mutual
security.
O Militarism
O Alliances
Imperialism
O Nationalism
The cause of WWI that arose from countries joining together for mutual security is Alliances.
cause of WWI arose from countries -In the early 20th century, European nations formed alliances with each other to create a system of mutual defense in case of war. These alliances led to a complicated web of obligations and commitments, where a small conflict between two nations could quickly escalate into a large-scale war involving multiple countries. The most notable alliances were the Triple Entente, consisting of Britain, France, and Russia, and the Central Powers, consisting of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. Ultimately, the system of alliances contributed to the outbreak of WWI, as one nation's mobilization for war led to a domino effect of mobilization across Europe.
To know more about outbreak of WWI, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28559086
#SPJ1
The policy of appeasement made Hitler stop his attacks and avoided war.
After the fall of France in 1940, what was the only nation left fighting Germany?
Soviet Union
Great Britain
United States
Italy
Switzerland
Answer:
Explanation:
Great Britain was the only nation left fighting Germany after the fall of France in 1940.
after the civil war, southern states still controlled setting voter qualifications which permitted the creation of laws severely limiting and excluding black americans from voting.
After the civil war, southern states still controlled setting voter qualifications which permitted the creation of laws severely limiting and excluding black Americans from voting.
After the Civil War, the Southern states still controlled setting voter qualifications, and this permitted the creation of laws severely limiting and excluding black Americans from voting. This period was known as the Jim Crow era, which began in 1877 and lasted until the mid-1960s.
It was a time when many African Americans were barred from voting due to laws and regulations that aimed to prevent them from doing so.
These laws and regulations included literacy tests, poll taxes, and property ownership requirements, all of which made it difficult, if not impossible, for many African Americans to vote.
In some cases, even African Americans who met the qualifications required by law were denied the right to vote due to poll taxes, intimidation, or outright fraud. As a result, many black Americans were effectively excluded from the political process for many years.
To know more about civil war refer here
https://brainly.com/question/11874600#
#SPJ11
who is the youngest person to win an academy award
The youngest person to ever win an Academy Award is Tatum O'Neal.
She won the award for Best Supporting Actress in 1974 at the age of 10 for her role in the film "Paper Moon". O'Neal played the role of Addie Loggins, a young girl who travels with a con artist pretending to be her father. The film was directed by Peter Bogdanovich and also starred Ryan O'Neal, Tatum's real-life father. O'Neal's win was a historic moment for the Academy Awards, and she remains the youngest person ever to receive an Oscar. Despite her early success, O'Neal faced personal struggles in her life and career, but her achievement as a young actress in Hollywood remains a significant milestone in film history.
To learn more about Academy Award refer to:
brainly.com/question/15096407
#SPJ4
What does building socialism mean
which industry was most affected by the contributions of howard hughes, sr.?
Howard Hughes Sr. had a major impact on the oil and aviation industries. He founded the Hughes Tool Company and invented the two-cone roller bit, which revolutionized oil drilling, and founded the Hughes Aircraft Company, which developed and manufactured innovative aircraft, missiles, and other aerospace technology.
Howard Hughes, Sr., was most closely associated with the oil and gas industry. Howard Hughes, Sr., was an American businessman who made a significant contribution to the oil and gas sector, which is known as the industry that was most affected by his contributions. The following are some of the major contributions that Howard Hughes, Sr., made to the oil and gas industry:
1. Brought innovative oil drilling techniques into the oil industry.
2. He invented the tri-cone roller bit.
3. Hughes Tool Company (HTC): Hughes was also the founder of the Hughes Tool Company (HTC), which is a firm that specialized in the manufacture of drill bits, and it was this company that made him wealthy.
As a result, Howard Hughes, Sr., significantly contributed to the oil and gas industry with his innovative drilling techniques and the invention of the tri-cone roller bit.
For more such questions on Howard Hughes Sr.
https://brainly.com/question/9263207
#SPJ11
identify the statements that describe the marbury v. madison decision and its significance.
Answer:
Marbury v. Madison, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1803, was the legal decision that established the use of judicial review. In that case, the Supreme Court found that Congress's Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court established the principle that it has the authority to declare a law unconstitutional and so null and void.
the changes in described in the excerpt most strongly support the argumen that in the late nineteenth century worker's ideas were evolving with regards to
The changes described in the excerpt most strongly support the argument that in the late nineteenth century workers' ideas were evolving with regards to their political power and the possibility of collective action.
What the author is saying in this excerpt is that the struggle for the eight-hour workday was not just about that specific issue, but was part of a broader movement for workers' rights and recognition. Workers were beginning to realize that they had power in numbers, and that by joining together and fighting for their rights they could achieve greater equality and respect in society.Therefore, the changes described in the excerpt most strongly support the argument that in the late nineteenth century workers' ideas were evolving with regards to their political power and the possibility of collective action.
For more such questions on late nineteenth century
https://brainly.com/question/11579840
#SPJ11
as demonstrated during the ukraine uprising, which best shows the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level?
The documentation of events on a grassroots level during the Ukraine uprising allowed for the dissemination of information that may have been suppressed or distorted by traditional media outlets (option A).
Social media and citizen journalists provided real-time updates and footage of the protests, allowing for a global audience to witness the events as they unfolded. This helped to galvanize international support for the protesters and put pressure on the Ukrainian government to address their grievances. Additionally, the documentation of police brutality and human rights violations helped to hold those responsible accountable for their actions.
Overall, the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level during the Ukraine uprising include increased transparency, accountability, and support for social and political change.
Option A is the correct answer.
"
Complete quesion
As demonstrated during the ukraine uprising, which best shows the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level?
A- The documentation of events on a grassroots level.
B- The hindrance of events.
"
You can learn more about Ukraine uprising at
https://brainly.com/question/26824054
#SPJ11
How have presidents used their position to increase the power of the office? Give examples
Throughout history, presidents of the United States have sought to increase the power of their office in various ways.
Here are some examples of how presidents have used their position to increase the power of the presidency:
Executive Orders: Presidents have used executive orders to bypass Congress and implement policies unilaterally. For example, President Obama issued executive orders to create the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which allowed undocumented immigrants who came to the US as children to stay and work in the country.
Executive Privilege: Presidents have claimed executive privilege to protect certain information from disclosure to Congress or the courts. For example, President Nixon famously claimed executive privilege to withhold tapes and other documents related to the Watergate scandal.
War Powers: Presidents have expanded their powers as commander-in-chief to initiate military action without congressional approval. For example, President George W. Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq in 2003 without a formal declaration of war from Congress.
Signing Statements: Presidents have used signing statements to indicate their interpretation of a law and how it should be implemented. For example, President George W. Bush issued signing statements that challenged congressional restrictions on his authority to conduct surveillance on American citizens without a warrant.
Appointment Powers: Presidents have used their appointment powers to shape the direction of the government. For example, President Franklin D. Roosevelt appointed numerous justices to the Supreme Court, which helped to shape the court's jurisprudence for decades.
These are just a few examples of how presidents have used their position to increase the power of the presidency.
Learn more about presidents
https://brainly.com/question/497462
#SPJ4
Admitting territories as new states to the Union contributed most to tensions between the North and South by
A. gradually increasing the need for universal suffrage.
B. shifting representation from existing to new states.
C. upsetting the balance between free and slave states.
D. rapidly increasing the need for new roads and bridges.
Answer:
C. upsetting the balance between free and slave states.
Explanation:
Relevance of understanding the philippine poetry and prose during the spanish colonial period
Understanding Philippine poetry and prose during the Spanish colonial period is important because it provides insight into the country's cultural and historical identity.
Literature during this period reflects the struggles and resistance of Filipinos against Spanish colonization, as well as their attempts to preserve their own cultural traditions and values. It also shows how Philippine literature was shaped by Spanish influence and how it evolved over time. Moreover, it highlights the role of literature in shaping the Filipino consciousness and in promoting nationalism and social awareness. By studying Philippine literature during the Spanish colonial period, we gain a better understanding of our cultural heritage and the ongoing struggle for social and political liberation.
To know more about Spanish colonial period click here:
brainly.com/question/4488404
#SPJ4
Help! 50 points + Branliest!
Explain how the policy of appeasement leads to Hitler’s taking of the Sudentenland in Czechoslovakia and how this lead to the beginning of World War II. (200 Words)
Answer:
The policy of appeasement was the approach taken by Britain and France towards Nazi Germany in the years leading up to World War II. Instead of confronting Adolf Hitler's territorial ambitions in Europe, these nations sought to appease him by making concessions with the hope of avoiding war. This policy, however, ultimately failed and contributed to the outbreak of World War II.
One of the most notable examples of appeasement was the Munich Agreement of 1938, in which Britain and France allowed Germany to annex the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia. This was done without the consultation of the Czechoslovakian government and was an attempt to appease Hitler's territorial demands. The British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, famously declared upon his return from Munich that he had achieved "peace for our time."
However, Hitler's occupation of the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939 demonstrated the failure of the policy of appeasement. This aggression led to Britain and France realizing the futility of appeasement and declaring war on Germany on September 3, 1939, beginning World War II.
The policy of appeasement ultimately failed because it gave Hitler the impression that he could act aggressively and that the other European powers would not respond. It also allowed Hitler to re-arm Germany and consolidate his power without opposition. The failure of appeasement taught the world a valuable lesson that aggressive dictators cannot be appeased, and that the only way to stop them is to confront them directly.
on march 3, 1918, what treaty did russia sign with germany and the central powers ending their involvement in world war 1?
Answer:
The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (also known as the Treaty of Brest in Russia) was a separate peace treaty signed on 3 March 1918 between Russia and the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, Bulgaria, and the Ottoman Empire), that ended Russia's participation in World War I.
Explanation: I really hope this helps!! Mark me brainliest!!
Have a good evening!! :))
How might your life be different had George iii accepted the olive branch petition
Explanation:
Britain's King George III, however, refused to receive the petition, which, written by John Dickinson, appealed directly to the king and expressed hope for reconciliation between the colonies and Great Britain.
The most important element in Rome’s strong economy was
a. agriculture
b. glassmaking
c. metalworking
d. pottery
The most important element in Rome’s strong economy was A) agriculture.
The Roman Empire's economy was fueled by agriculture, and it was the foundation of the empire's wealth. The Roman economy was primarily based on A) agriculture, as was the case in most ancient civilizations. Rome's prosperity was founded on its agricultural resources, which were significant because they offered food for the populace and contributed to the empire's wealth.
Agriculture was the primary source of income for the Roman Empire. It was the foundation of the empire's wealth, as well as the primary source of income for the state treasury. Romans were well-known for their skills in constructing an irrigation system to transport water throughout the arid land.
In the Roman Empire, there was a lot of land that was perfect for agriculture. They produced crops such as wheat, corn, and barley, and livestock such as cattle, goats, and sheep. The majority of the crops were utilized to feed the Roman population, with a small percentage being exported to other nations.
The wealth that Rome generated from agriculture was used to fund its military campaigns, construct public buildings, and maintain public works like aqueducts and roads. Agriculture was the primary source of the empire's wealth, as well as the primary source of income for the state treasury. As a result, it is safe to say that Rome's agricultural sector was the backbone of its economy, and without it, the empire would not have been able to achieve such a high degree of wealth and success.
For similar questions on "Agriculture" :
https://brainly.com/question/3161950
#SPJ11
1. After reading the topics, summarize some of the reasons that global migrations occurred in the
1750-1900 time period:
2. How do you think industrialization played a role in increased migrations in this time period?
3. How did environmental factors play a role in increased migrations in this time period?
4. How do you think global capitalism played a role in increased migrations during this time period?
Answer:
1. Global migrations occurred in the 1750-1900 time period due to various reasons such as economic opportunities, religious persecution, political instability, wars, and natural disasters.
2. Industrialization played a significant role in increased migrations during this time period. As industrialization led to the growth of factories and manufacturing industries, there was a need for more labor. This led to the migration of people from rural areas to urban centers in search of work.
3. Environmental factors such as droughts, floods, famines, and other natural disasters also played a role in increased migrations during this time period. These environmental factors often led to crop failures and food shortages, which forced people to migrate to other areas in search of food and better living conditions.
4. Global capitalism also played a significant role in increased migrations during this time period. The growth of capitalist economies and the search for new markets and resources led to colonization and imperialism. This, in turn, led to the forced migration of people from colonized territories to other parts of the world as laborers or slaves. Additionally, the growth of international trade and commerce led to the migration of skilled laborers and entrepreneurs in search of economic opportunities in other countries.
the compromise of 1850 removed the slavery question from congressional debate. yet, the new fugitive slave act made further controversy inevitable. which of the following provisions of the fugitive slave act proved controversial?
Federal commissions now decided the fate of fugitive slaves who have been arrested in the North, independent of state and local regulations.
Which were the main tenets of the 1850 Compromise?The laws set a boundary with Tex and the The Us, abolished the slave market in Washington, DC, that revised this same Fugitive Slave Act in addition to calling for the entrance of California as just a "free state" and territory governments for both New Mexico and Utah.
Why did Wilmot object to slavery being introduced to the new lands?Wilmot opposed the expansion of slavery into in the Mexican Cession and not just because he cared about African Americans but rather because he thought that slavery was bad for white labor and that lands should not be ceded to slaves. The government should use its newly acquired resources to strengthen the situation of white seasonal workers and small farms.
To know more about fugitive visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31036916
#SPJ1
What is the best definition of a "city-
state?"
A. The capital of a kingdom.
B. A palatial complex of buildings that housed a
monarch.
C. An independent, self-governing territory.
city-state, a political device consisting of an unbiased town having sovereignty over contiguous territory and serving as a centre and chief of political, economic, and cultural life.
What is the dictionary definition of city-state?city-state. noun. a kingdom consisting of a sovereign town and its dependencies. Among the most famous are the terrific impartial cities of the historic world, such as Athens, Sparta, Carthage, Thebes, Corinth, and Rome.
A city-state is an independent, self-governing united states contained completely inside the borders of a single city. The ancient empires of Rome, Carthage, Athens, and Sparta are regarded early examples of city-states.
Learn more about city-state here:
https://brainly.com/question/14500968#SPJ1briefly explain one example of how religion and science were a source of conflict in american society during the 1920s. b) briefly explain one development during the 1920s that changed attitudes toward prohibition. c) briefly explain one important difference in the immigrant legislation of the 1920s in comparison to earlier periods.
a) The conflict between religion and science in American society during the 1920s can be exemplified by the Scopes Monkey Trial. The trial was a court case held in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925, where a high school biology teacher named John Scopes was accused of violating the Butler Act, which prohibited the teaching of evolution in schools. The case became a national spectacle and pitted proponents of evolution against those who believed in the literal interpretation of the Bible. Although Scopes was found guilty and fined $100, the trial brought the issue of evolution to the forefront of American public discourse and highlighted the tensions between science and religion.
b) One development during the 1920s that changed attitudes toward prohibition was the rise of organized crime. Prohibition, which banned the sale and consumption of alcohol, was enacted in 1919 with the ratification of the 18th Amendment. However, the law was widely flouted, and many people continued to drink and buy alcohol illegally. Organized crime syndicates, such as the mafia, saw an opportunity to profit from the demand for alcohol and began to smuggle and sell it on a large scale. This led to an increase in violence and corruption, and many Americans began to view prohibition as a failure.
c) An important difference in the immigrant legislation of the 1920s in comparison to earlier periods was the introduction of quotas. The Immigration Act of 1924 established a quota system that limited the number of immigrants who could enter the United States from each country. The quotas were based on the percentage of each nationality that was already present in the United States in 1890, which favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe and restricted those from Southern and Eastern Europe. This marked a departure from earlier policies that had favored open immigration and reflected a growing nativist sentiment in American society.
For more such questions on American society
https://brainly.com/question/13323062
#SPJ11
100 Points + Brainliest!
1. Explain the state of Germany between the end of WWI and WWII. Make sure to discuss the Treaty of Versailles, the 1920s, and the Great Depression. (100 WORDS)
2. Summarize the reoccupation of the Rhineland. What is the history of the Rhineland after World War I? What happened during the reoccupation? Who was involved? What was the outcome? (200 WORDS)
3. Explain the state of Japan between the end of WWI and WWII. (100 WORDS)
4. What was the consequence of Germany's Reoccupation of the Rhineland? (How did other countries respond?)
5. What was the consequence of Japan's Invasion of Manchuria? (How did other countries respond?)
Germany's history was turbulent between the conclusion of World War I and the outbreak of World War II.
How to understand WW II?After World War I, Germany was devastated by the Treaty of Versailles and financially destitute. The Treaty of Versailles imposed heavy reparations and restrictions on the country. In the 1920s Germany struggled to recover economically and politically due to several different governments and increasing political extremism. The global economic crisis exacerbated the situation, causing high unemployment and social unrest. Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party came to power in his 1930s, promising to restore power to Germany and overcome the injustices of the Treaty of Versailles. This eventually led to the outbreak of World War II. The Rhineland was a region of West Germany occupied by the Allies after World War I. In violation of the Treaty of Versailles and the Locarno Accords, Hitler ordered his 1936 reoccupation of the Rhineland. The reoccupation was initially met with resistance within Hitler's own government, but was ultimately successful without much opposition from other countries. The reoccupation of the Rhineland was an important step in Hitler's expansion and rearmament program, allowing Germany to secure the western frontier and gain access to vital resources. International response was limited, with France and Britain expressing concerns but not taking direct action. The reoccupation helped strengthen Hitler and the Nazi Party, leading to further aggression in Europe.
At the beginning of the 20th century, Japan was a superpower with a burgeoning economy and military power. The country gained territory and influence through the Russo-Japanese War and World War I, becoming one of the leading states in the League of Nations. However, from the 1920s to her early 1930s, Japan faced economic challenges of great economic crisis and political instability. Military leaders came to power and advocated aggressive expansionism, which led to Japan's invasion of Manchuria in 1931 and further aggression against China and Southeast Asia. The reoccupation of the Rhineland had a major impact on international relations and the outbreak of World War II. France and Great Britain expressed concern over violations of the Treaty of Versailles, but took no direct action to stop Germany. It led to the invasion of Czechoslovakia, and eventually to the outbreak of World War II.
Japan's invasion of Manchuria in 1931 had a major impact on international relations and the outbreak of World War II. This invasion violated international law and led to Japan's withdrawal from the League of Nations. International response has been limited, with many countries condemning the aggression but taking no direct action...even now. This ensued, sparking further conflicts and ultimately leading to the outbreak of World War II.
To Know more about World war II Visit:
brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ1
what was the impact of the british clean air act of 1956?
The impact of the UK's Clean Air Act 1956 was that it gave local governments the power to control emissions of smoke, sand, dust and smoke from industrial plants and furnaces and to establish smoke control zones.
Emissions of these substances may be prohibited in these controlled zones. In summary, his 1956 and 1968 CAAs in the UK helped improve air quality by reducing black smoke and sulfur dioxide emissions.
At the time, the government did not consider it necessary to pass his CAA, but pressure from British MPs and other influential political parties, who were the first to see the negative effects of air quality, led to the CAA being implemented. rice field.
Emissions control measures contributed to his CAA's success, allowing local governments to enforce laws on smoke-free zones and permitted fuels. The first Clean Air Act 1956 was followed by the 1968 CAA after learning more about measures to improve air quality and conditions. The law is seen around the world as an example of significant environmental legislation aimed at improving air quality.
Know more about Clean Air Act 1956 here:
https://brainly.com/question/3199895
#SPJ4
The Shocking Cynicism Behind the Voyage of the “St. Louis” and Its Ship Full of Jewish Refugees from Nazi Germany
What is the author referring to when he says, “And if a few thousand Nazi collaborators ended up in the US refugee potpourri, better them than Jews, who belonged in Palestine?”
What is the “shocking cynicism” that the author refers to in the title of the article?
Answer:
\ The author is referring to the belief held by some in the US government at the time that Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany were not a priority and that it was more important to focus on admitting refugees who were deemed politically favorable, such as those who were anti-Nazi or potential allies in the war effort. The author suggests that this attitude led to a lack of action on the part of the US government to help the Jewish refugees aboard the St. Louis, and instead they were turned away and sent back to Europe.
Explanation:
What is a good job? How do jobs demonstrate ethical job labor practices?
Topic Sentence:
Detail 1
Detail 2
Detail 3
Topic Sentence: A good job is one that provides fair compensation, a positive work environment, and opportunities for growth and development, while demonstrating ethical labor practices.
What informs a good job?Detail 1: Fair Compensation - A good job should provide a salary that is commensurate with the employee's experience, skills, and qualifications. It should also offer benefits such as health insurance, retirement plans, and paid time off.
A fair compensation package shows that the employer values the contributions of their employees and is committed to providing them with a stable and secure livelihood.
Detail 2: Positive Work Environment - A good job should provide a safe and supportive work environment that promotes employee well-being and fosters a sense of community.
This can include policies that encourage work-life balance, opportunities for socialization and team-building, and mechanisms for addressing workplace conflict and harassment. A positive work environment is critical for employee satisfaction, engagement, and productivity.
Detail 3: Ethical Labor Practices - A good job should adhere to ethical labor practices that protect the rights and dignity of workers. This includes fair hiring and promotion practices, non-discrimination and equal opportunity policies, and compliance with labor laws and regulations.
Employers should also promote diversity and inclusion in the workplace and ensure that their suppliers and business partners uphold similar ethical standards. Ethical labor practices demonstrate a commitment to social responsibility and contribute to a more just and equitable society.
learn more about a good job: https://brainly.com/question/28770262
#SPJ1
who was the only eligible incumbent us president not to be his party renomination for a second term
Franklin Pierce was the only eligible incumbent us president not to be his party renomination for a second term. Franklin Pierce supported for the South significantly hurt his standing with many North Democrats.
Democratic party's members declined to support him again and backed other one instead, who had less contentious views. The enslavement debate split Democrats as the race for president drew near. It had been generally anticipated that the choice would come to an end with no result as no significant aspirant would be have the required majority. Franklin Pierce enjoyed backing in his own area and region of election but troubled becoming selected due to the fact that was for a very long long time away from power for and lacked the national recognition of the collaboration. Franklin Pierce supported for the South significantly hurt his standing with many North Democrats
Learn more on president
https://brainly.com/question/20211357
#SPJ4
dr kings tome and style contrast with the kinds of political speech we most often hear today. why do you think that is and what does it say about his contect and ourds
Dr. King's speeches were unique in that they were rooted in strong moral values, emphasized the importance of unity, and advocated for nonviolent civil disobedience. His approach stands in stark contrast to the divisive and often partisan language used in modern political discourse. This speaks to the timelessness of Dr. King's message and the continued relevance of his work today.
Dr. King's tone and style contrast with the types of political speech we mostly hear today. Why do you think that is, and what does it say about his context and ours?Dr. King's tone and style differ from the types of political speeches we hear today because his speeches have a more profound and meaningful approach. Dr. King's speeches focused on the human experience rather than the politics of it. The context in which Dr. King gave his speeches was quite different from the context in which political speeches are given today. Dr. King was focused on ensuring civil rights for all individuals, regardless of race, and he used his speeches to inspire and motivate people to work together to achieve this goal.Dr. King's speeches are seen as classic and memorable, and his words still inspire people today. The current political speeches have a negative and partisan approach, which only serves to widen the gap between different groups of people. The current political speeches often lack empathy, and it only highlights the divisive nature of the politics today. It says that Dr. King believed in unity and bringing people together, and he wanted everyone to be treated equally. It says that our current society needs to focus more on inclusivity and empathy, rather than being negative and divisive. Dr. King believed that everyone has the right to be heard and to live in a world that is just and equal, and his speeches have played a significant role in bringing positive change.
For more such questions on civil disobedience
https://brainly.com/question/8144430
#SPJ11
who were the first group of people targeted by huac? doctors government workers screenwriters and actors
The first group of people targeted by the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) were screenwriters and actors.
What was the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC)?The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) was a congressional committee established in 1938 to investigate individuals and organizations with alleged ties to communism. It became more active in the 1940s and 1950s, with a focus on investigating alleged communist influence in the film industry, universities, and government agencies.
Several prominent figures in the entertainment industry, including screenwriters and actors, were called to testify before the committee and were blacklisted for their political views. This led to many people losing their jobs and facing significant personal and professional consequences.
Therefore, the correct answer is: ''Screenwriters and actors.''
See more about HUAC at https://brainly.com/question/1130666.
#SPJ11
