What percentage of households in the survey have four or more televisions?

Answer:

A'(5,-1)

Step-by-step explanation:

90° clockwise= (y,-x)

Point=A(1,5)

A(1,5)=A'(5,-1)

Answer:

v² - 4

Step-by-step explanation:

To simplify usually means to reduce something.

So like in this problem all we have to do is reduce...

v^2 - 2^2

v² - 4

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the salary in the previous year = $ x

Now the salary = $ (x +1000)

This year savings = $ 5720

13% * (x + 1000)= 5720

0.13 *(x + 1000) = 5720

0.13*x + 0.13*1000 = 5720

0.13x + 130 = 5720        {subtract 130 from both sides}

         0.13x = 5720 - 130

        0.13x  = 5590    {Divide both sides by 0.13}

               x = 5590/0.13

x = $ 43000

Sandra's previous year salary = $ 43000

Answer:

The value of A=7

The value of B=2

SEMOGA MEMBANTU

Answer:

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{ 1 }{3} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

we would like to compute the following limit:

[tex]\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty } \frac{ \sqrt{4 {n}^{2} + 3n } }{6n} [/tex]

if we compute the limit from numerator to denominator directly,we'd end up with

[tex] \dfrac{ \infty }{ \infty } [/tex]

which is an indeterminate form so we must do it in a different way. well to compute this limit,we can consider factoring method . notice that we can factor the numerator and that yields

[tex]\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty } \frac{ \sqrt{ {n}^{2} ( 4 {}^{} + \frac{3}{n} )} }{6n} [/tex]

remember that ,

thus we acquire:

[tex]\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty } \frac{ {n} \sqrt{ ( 4 {}^{} + \frac{3}{n} )} }{6n} [/tex]

reduce fraction:

[tex]\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty } \frac{ {} \sqrt{ 4 {}^{} + \frac{3}{n} } }{6} [/tex]

as n approaches to ∞ ,3/n approaches to 0 which yields:

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{ \sqrt{ 4 {}^{} } }{6} [/tex]

simplify square root:

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{ 2 }{6} [/tex]

reduce fraction:

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{ 1 }{3} [/tex]

hence,

[tex]\displaystyle \lim_{n \to \infty } \frac{ \sqrt{4 {n}^{2} + 3n } }{6n} = \boxed{ \frac{1}{3} }[/tex]

and we're done!

Answer:

4.1 + 5.2 = 9.3

distance can never be negative

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The positive divisors of 2160 are:

1,  2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 16, 18, 20, 24, 27, 30, 36, 40, 45, 48, 54, 60, 72, 80, 90, 108, 120, 135, 144, 180, 216, 240, 270, 360, 432, 540, 720, 1080, 2160

Multiples of 3 are:

3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 24, 27, 30, 36, 45, 48, 54, 60, 72, 90, 108, 120, 135, 144, 180, 216, 240, 270, 360, 432, 540, 720, 1080, 2160

The number of divisors, multiples of 3 is:

Answer:

7 - 51

Step-by-step explanation:

additive inverse : a number that when added to a given number gives zero the additive inverse of 4 is −4 

Answer:

-2

Step-by-step explanation:

-5 - (-3)

-5 + 3

= -2

Answer:

the answer is C

Step-by-step explanation:

its making write more so yeah

Answer:

x=6.5

Step-by-step explanation:

subtract 3.5 from 10 and it gives you 6.5

:)

Answer:

f(4) = 0

Step-by-step explanation:

If the value of x is between 0 and 5, then the f(x) will equal 0.

x = 4 is greater than 0 and less than 5, so f(4) = 0

Answer:

division

Step-by-step explanation:

you need to get x by its self. so divide by 5 on both sides and get x = 2

Answer:

2(2y+5)/2=37.2/2

2y+5=37

2y+5-5=37-5

2y=32

2y/2=32/2

y=16

the closest to that is y=8

Step-by-step explanation:

hope that helps>3

Answer:

-5

Step-by-step explanation:

-3y=-3x+15

y=x-5

make x=0

y=0-5

y=-5

Answer:

48 inches

or

0.8 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the unit rate of inches per hour, divide 144 by 3.

144÷3=48

You don't need to round because there are no decimals.

To find the time to braid 1 inch, first multiply 3 by 60 (because there are 60 minutes in 1 hour).

3×60=180

Then divide 144 by 180.

144÷180= 0.8

You don't need to round because there are no thousandths.

Answer:x=-0.75

Step by step: 4 to 2nd power multiple 4 by 4 you get 16 so (-8x-6)16 multiply 16 to -6 and -8x and so on...

Answer:

option 2 is answerrrrrrrrrr

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\text{The length between 2 points, } (x_1, y_1)\text{ and }(x_2,y_2)\text{ is determined by, }[/tex]

[tex]d=\sqrt{(x_2-x_1)^2+(y_2-y_1)^2}[/tex]

[tex]\text{The length between } (12, -22)\text{ and }(8, -30)\text{ is determined by, }[/tex]

[tex]d=\sqrt{(8-12)^2+(-30-(-22))^2}=\sqrt{4^2+8^2}=\sqrt{4^2(1+2^2)}=4\sqrt5[/tex]

There are many examples to pick from, but one example is this:

The set of rational numbers (aka any fraction of two integers) is closed under the operation of division. Divide any two rational numbers and we get some other rational number.

However, the set of integers is not closed under division. If we divided 10 over 3, then we get 10/3 = 3.333 approximately which isn't an integer. So just because the set of integers is a subset of the rationals, it doesn't mean that the idea of closure follows suit from superset to subset.  

Side note: The term "superset" is basically the reverse of a subset. If A is a subset of B, then B is a superset of A.

Answer:

sorry but this photo is not clear

Answer:

blur photo cannot answered

Answer:

= 372,967

Step-by-step explanation:

hope it's help

#MASTER GROUP

# FIRST MASTER

# PHILIPPINES

Answer:

372967

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

2.63340641 × 10109 m13 / s13

Answer:

2.57

Step-by-step explanation:

3x²-5x-7=0

Eqn and u will get the answer

Lets simplify

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto \dfrac{x}{3}=-7.\dfrac{x}{3}[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto \dfrac{x}{3}=\dfrac{-7x}{3}[/tex]

[tex]\\ \sf\longmapsto -7[/tex]

Hence its not a fraction