Each of these could be considered biased by an author who emphasizes various points of view when examining the original material.
What is an illustration of emphasis?The value of peace was underlined by him. Education is important, the teacher said. The significance of finishing this by the deadline must be emphasized. He stressed how crucial it is to put in a lot of effort.The spelling emphasise, also known as emphasises, emphasised, and emphasising, is used in Britain. Its noun form is emphasis. The American spelling emphasize is favored. Emphasizes, emphasized, and emphasizing are similar terms.When you wish to accentuate something or give something more weight, the verb emphasize works well. Adding emphasis to specific words in a sentence is another natural thing our voices do. The listener may understand the sentence's meaning more clearly and is informed about its significance by the emphasis.The complte question is:
When analyzing source material, each of these might indicate bias on the part of an author EXCEPT
A)stereotyping people in an article.
B)emphasizing multiple points of view.
C)exaggerating outcomes or consequences.
D)making generalizations such as “everyone knows.”
To learn more about emphasizes, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28727795
as described in the passage, the pattern of economic development in russia in the nineteenth century differed most strongly from which other pattern of economic development during the same period? responses the emergence of resource export economies, such as those in colonial south asia the emergence of resource export economies, such as those in colonial south asia the expansion of transnational businesses, such as global banking and insurance companies the expansion of transnational businesses, such as global banking and insurance companies the implementation of economic policies to promote industrialization, such as the attempts to develop a cotton textile industry in egypt the implementation of economic policies to promote industrialization, such as the attempts to develop a cotton textile industry in egypt the transition from preindustrial to industrial production through the actions of private entrepreneurs or companies
The pattern of economic development in Russia in the nineteenth century differed most strongly from the transition from preindustrial to industrial production through the actions of private entrepreneurs or companies, such as the attempts to develop a cotton textile industry in Egypt.
About RussiaRussia, country that stretches over a vast expanse of eastern Europe and northern Asia. Once the preeminent republic of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (U.S.S.R.; commonly known as the Soviet Union), Russia became an independent country after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991.
Russia is a land of superlatives. By far the world’s largest country, it covers nearly twice the territory of Canada, the second largest. It extends across the whole of northern Asia and the eastern third of Europe, spanning 11 time zones and incorporating a great range of environments and landforms, from deserts to semiarid steppes to deep forests and Arctic tundra.
Russia contains Europe’s longest river, the Volga, and its largest lake, Ladoga. Russia also is home to the world’s deepest lake, Baikal, and the country recorded the world’s lowest temperature outside the North and South poles.
Learn more about Russia at
https://brainly.com/question/17907644
#SPJ11
who was the first woman to become a supreme court justice?
Sandra Day O'Connor became the first woman to serve as a Supreme Court justice in the United States.
She was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1981 and served on the court until her retirement in 2006. O'Connor was known for her moderate views and was often a swing vote on the court.Sandra Day O'Connor is the name of the first woman to become a Supreme Court Justice. She was born in El Paso, Texas, on March 26, 1930. Her parents, Harry Alfred Day and Ada Mae (Wilkey) Day, were ranchers. O'Connor's father was a rancher who raised cattle and cotton.
Her mother was a former schoolteacher who loved to read and write. O'Connor grew up on her family's Lazy B ranch in southeastern Arizona. She helped her parents with the chores and attended a one-room schoolhouse nearby. She later attended Stanford Law School and graduated in 1952. She was one of only a few women in her class.
For such more questions on Sandra Day O'Connor :
brainly.com/question/21971903
#SPJ11
Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
[06.05 MC]
Excerpt taken from The Historic Rise of Old Hickory by Suzanne B. Williams
Four major candidates ran in the 1824 election, all under the "Democratic-Republican" name. One of the candidates, Andrew Jackson, was already famous. In the 1780s, he earned the right to practice law and served in various offices of the state government, including senator. He earned the nickname "Old Hickory" for his toughness as a general during the War of 1812 and First Seminole War. Jackson supported slavery and "Indian removal." This earned him support from voters in southern and frontier states. The other three candidates were John Quincy Adams of Massachusetts, Henry Clay of Kentucky, and William Crawford of Georgia.
U.S. presidents are elected through the Electoral College. The Founding Fathers worried that Americans were too spread out to learn enough about the candidates. Under the Electoral College, Americans cast their ballot for the popular vote, which chooses the electors for each state. The number of electoral votes each state equals the number of representatives and senators combined. The candidates must win an absolute majority of electoral votes to win the election.
In 1824, Andrew Jackson won the popular vote, but he did not win it in each state. Jackson and Adams both won many electoral votes. Jackson won the most with 99. However, a candidate needs an absolute majority of electoral votes to win. In 1824, Jackson needed 131 to win. When there is not majority winner, the election goes to the House of Representatives. This has only happened twice in U.S. history.
Even though he won the popular vote and many electoral votes, Andrew Jackson lost the presidency in 1824. John Quincy Adams was the Secretary of State at this time. Henry Clay was the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Henry Clay, receiving the least, was left out. However, as a leader in the House of Representatives, he had influence over the other members. Clay openly hated Jackson and there were rumors that Clay made a deal with Adams in exchange for his support. The House election declared John Quincy Adams president. Soon, he chose Henry Clay to fill the seat he left vacant, Secretary of State. Jackson was shocked and enraged. Although there was no inquiry of possible wrongdoing, Jackson accused Adams and Clay of making a "corrupt bargain."
John Quincy Adams was a disappointment as president. Many of his goals created divisions like federal funds for internal improvement. Some states thought that taking federal funds would force them to follow certain rules. They felt this reduced their rights as independent states. Jackson took advantage of issues like this one to gather more support. More Jackson supporters found their way to seats in Congress. He was as a man of the people and said Adams could never understand the common man’s concerns.
John Quincy Adams ran against Andrew Jackson in the 1828 election. Personal attacks grew even more vicious, but Andrew Jackson appealed to many. He believed government was for the common man. He believed in strict reading of the law and limited internal improvements. He also believed in states’ rights.
Andrew Jackson easily won the 1828 election, winning both the popular vote and a majority of electoral votes. Historians note the sectional nature of the voting. Support for Jackson was concentrated in South while Adams’ support was mostly in the North. Jackson was so popular because he brought changes to the government. He also wanted to make sure the government was responsible for its actions. Jackson pushed settlement into the frontier. He supported the Indian Removal act. He also defended the spread of slavery. Though his support was heavier in the South, he was determined to keep a unified nation. The rise and presidency of Old Hickory is memorable to Americans today.
Which statement makes a true comparison of the 1824 and 1828 elections?
The losers in 1824 were the main candidates for president in 1828.
Sectional divisions were appearing in 1824 and very clear in 1828.
Candidates were more divided on the issues in 1828 than in 1824.
More people voted in the election of 1824 than they did in 1828.
The true comparison can be seen in the sentence "Sectional divisions were appearing in 1824 and very clear in 1828."
What was the great impact that the elections of 1824 and 1828 had?They reinforced the population's need to choose their political leaders.Strengthened the two-party system.He highlighted the political differences between the south and north of the country.In 1824 the country realized how influential sectional divisions were in national politics. This caused many politicians and parties to establish strategies that ensured greater relevance in parts of the country. This became even more relevant and strong in 1828.
Learn more about the sectional divisions between the 1824 and 1828 elections:
https://brainly.com/question/2117462
#SPJ1
How did the detonation of the Soviet Union's first atomic bomb impact people in the United States?
A: Many people became fearful of Soviet spies living within the United States
B: American politicians attempted to get the United Nations to ban development and use of nuclear weapons
C: People started to move to rural areas in preparation of a nuclear war with the Soviet Union
D: The United States and Soviet Union began talks to reduce the number of nuclear weapons
2. How did the idea of mutually assured destruction impact the relationship between the United States and Soviet Union?
A:The United States attempted to influence protests in European countries controlled by the Soviet Union
B:The Soviet Union attempted to defeat the United States economically instead of through the military
C:Each side started to negotiate a reduction in nuclear arms
D:Both sides fought proxy wars in former colonies instead of fighting each other directly
3. How did the communist Cuban revolution impact tensions between the United States and Soviet Union?
A:The Soviet Union attempted to force the United States to stop the Marshall Plan under threat of nuclear war
B:The United States responded by placing nuclear missiles in Turkey
C:An American blockade of Cuba almost led to nuclear conflict with the Soviet Union
D:Both sides started to fund radicals around the world in order to gain an advantage over the other country
4. How did President John F. Kennedy resolve the Cuban missile crisis with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev?
A:The United States promised to end Marshall Plan funding in Eastern Europe
B:The United States removed missiles from Turkey
C:The United States gave the Soviet Union more voting power in the United Nations
D:The United States lifted the embargo on Cuba and other communist nations
5. How did the American response to the Berlin Wall's construction impact the Soviet Union?
A:The Soviets continued to spread communism to places like Cuba, Korea, and Vietnam
B:The Soviets started to build up their nuclear arsenal in an attempt to overpower the United States
C:The Soviet Union gave Eastern European countries more self rule
D:The Soviet Union restricted any western goods from entering communist markets
The correct answers to the given questions are:
D: The United States and Soviet Union began talks to reduce the number of nuclear weapons.
C: Each side started to negotiate a reduction in nuclear arms.
How did these happen?The detonation of the Soviet Union's first atomic bomb led to the United States and Soviet Union beginning talks to reduce the number of nuclear weapons. This was due to the fear of a potential nuclear war between the two countries.
The idea of mutually assured destruction led to each side negotiating a reduction in nuclear arms. Both the United States and Soviet Union recognized that a nuclear war between the two countries would result in mutual destruction, leading to talks about reducing the number of nuclear weapons.
The communist Cuban revolution led to an American blockade of Cuba, which almost led to nuclear conflict with the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union had placed nuclear missiles in Cuba, leading to a tense standoff between the two countries.
President John F. Kennedy resolved the Cuban missile crisis with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev by removing missiles from Turkey. The United States had secretly placed missiles in Turkey, which had led to the Soviet Union placing missiles in Cuba. Removing the missiles from Turkey was a concession that allowed both countries to avoid war.
The American response to the Berlin Wall's construction was to continue to contain the spread of communism. The Soviets continued to spread communism to places like Cuba, Korea, and Vietnam in response to the United States' efforts to contain it.
The other answers are:
C: An American blockade of Cuba almost led to nuclear conflict with the Soviet Union.B: The United States removed missiles from Turkey.A: The Soviets continued to spread communism to places like Cuba, Korea, and Vietnam.Read more about communism here:
https://brainly.com/question/12173354
#SPJ1
identify the statements that describe the marbury v. madison decision and its significance.
Answer:
Marbury v. Madison, decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1803, was the legal decision that established the use of judicial review. In that case, the Supreme Court found that Congress's Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional. The Supreme Court established the principle that it has the authority to declare a law unconstitutional and so null and void.
After the fall of France in 1940, what was the only nation left fighting Germany?
Soviet Union
Great Britain
United States
Italy
Switzerland
Answer:
Explanation:
Great Britain was the only nation left fighting Germany after the fall of France in 1940.
after the civil war, southern states still controlled setting voter qualifications which permitted the creation of laws severely limiting and excluding black americans from voting.
After the civil war, southern states still controlled setting voter qualifications which permitted the creation of laws severely limiting and excluding black Americans from voting.
After the Civil War, the Southern states still controlled setting voter qualifications, and this permitted the creation of laws severely limiting and excluding black Americans from voting. This period was known as the Jim Crow era, which began in 1877 and lasted until the mid-1960s.
It was a time when many African Americans were barred from voting due to laws and regulations that aimed to prevent them from doing so.
These laws and regulations included literacy tests, poll taxes, and property ownership requirements, all of which made it difficult, if not impossible, for many African Americans to vote.
In some cases, even African Americans who met the qualifications required by law were denied the right to vote due to poll taxes, intimidation, or outright fraud. As a result, many black Americans were effectively excluded from the political process for many years.
To know more about civil war refer here
https://brainly.com/question/11874600#
#SPJ11
Significance of harrying in the north
The term "The Harrying of the North" refers to William the Conqueror's army's heinous massacre and plundering of Northumbria in 1069–1070. This is supposed to have been so terrible that 100,000 people died of starvation.
What results did William's repression of the North produce?Several soldiers defected from William's army and dispersed across the country. Several individuals escaped and relocated to southern Scotland. Several of these immigrants participated in the Hereward the Wake rebellion in East Anglia and the Welsh Marches resistance activities.
What distinctive qualities define the Harrying of the North?William's knights decimated Yorkshire and the other shires during the Harrying, which took place in the winter of 1069–1070. The people was massacred, the animals were butchered, and the food sources were devastated as entire settlements were burned to the ground.
Learn more about starvation: https://brainly.com/question/2819774
#SPJ1
One of the principal effects of 9/11 was instilling in Americans a fear that their personal security was at greater risk than ever before. Many aspects of the post-9/11 world are indeed new, but the fear it evokes echoes that felt by prior generations. At times the country has met those fears while still holding fast to its core democratic principles. Other times, fear has overruled American principles, especially the protection of individual freedoms. The most important legacy of the American experience following 9/11 will not be the novelty of fear, but rather how well the country copes with that fear while adhering to its constitutional framework. Given how searing the 9/11 experience was, it is sometimes hard to remember that prior generations of Americans didn’t always sleep soundly either. Pearl Harbor is an often-cited example, but it joins many other moments of intense fear in U.S. history. During the 40-plus years of the Cold War, American school children practiced "duck and cover" drills the way today’s kids might practice school lock-downs. As a teenage in the 1980s, I joined Sting in hoping we could avert a nuclear holocaust if "the Russians love their children, too."With the collapse of the Soviet Union, other threats in the United States soon appeared: the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, and the 1996 Atlanta Olympic Park bombing, to name just a few. During the 1990s, some in the military liked to refer to the United States as a "homeland sanctuary;" after 9/11, many talk about the end of that sanctuary.True, the country has experienced fewer external threats to its population than have most other nations. But it’s a misconception to think that the American sense of external threat is new.-Kathleen Hicks, "What Will Americans Do About Their Fear of Terrorism?" The Atlantic Monthly, 2016.The experience of those who lived through 9/11 needs to create which of the following outcomes, according to the author of the passage?a. Citizens should not let their fear of another terror attack override the country’s ability to adhere to the civil liberties protections outlined in the Constitution.b. Citizens need to acknowledge that the 9/11 attack was a unique event and work to develop a new strategy to combat future terror attacks.c. Citizens have to be willing to sacrifice some civil liberties in order to protect the country from future terrorist attacks.d. Citizens can rely on the government to develop plans to protect them in the event of a future attack on the United States.
A. Citizens shouldn't let their fear of another terrorist attack stop the country from upholding the Constitution's protections for civil liberties.
How does Constitution's protections for civil liberties?Civil liberties, which are guaranteed to every citizen as fundamental rights and freedoms, are protected by a number of safeguards in the Constitution. These safeguards consist of:
The Constitution: A set of fundamental rights that the government cannot violate were established by the first ten amendments to the Constitution, which were ratified in 1791.Fair treatment: Due process of law is guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. Protection for All: Equal legal protection is also guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, which states that the government cannot discriminate based on gender, race, ethnicity, religion, or gender identity.To know more about Fundamental Rights, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
Why did John.Calhoun believe the Tariff of 1828 was unconstitutional?
A.It favored one section of the country over another.
B. It put an end to the cotton trade with Great Britain.
C. It encouraged people to purchase cheap land in the West.
Answer:
A. It favored one section of the country over another.
Explanation:
Entries Write three journal entries as if you were living during the Great Depression. Each entry must be 3 full paragraphs and be sure to include the emotions the people were feeling talk about how people live during the dust bowl and stuff like that.
Answer:
Journal Entry 1: October 29, 1929
Today was a day that will go down in history. The stock market crashed and with it, all of our hopes and dreams for a prosperous future. The news spread like wildfire and panic set in. The value of stocks and bonds plummeted, and many people lost everything they had invested. My family and I were fortunate enough to not have invested in the market, but we still feel the effects of the crash. People are losing their jobs left and right and businesses are closing their doors. It's hard to imagine how we will survive this economic catastrophe.
To make matters worse, we are also living through the dust bowl. The skies are constantly dark with dust and the wind is relentless. The dust gets in everything - our clothes, our food, our lungs. It's hard to breathe and even harder to work. Farmers are struggling to grow crops and many are forced to abandon their farms. My family is lucky to have a small plot of land where we can grow some of our own food, but it's not enough to sustain us. We're doing our best to stay strong and hopeful, but it's becoming harder and harder every day.
Journal Entry 2: May 15, 1932
It's been three years since the stock market crash and things have only gotten worse. The country is in the grips of the Great Depression and it feels like there is no end in sight. Unemployment rates are at an all-time high and people are struggling to make ends meet. I've seen people begging on the streets and standing in long lines for soup kitchens. It's heart-wrenching to see the desperation in their eyes.
The dust bowl is still raging on and it's taking a toll on everyone. The soil is so dry and brittle that it's almost impossible to grow anything. We've had to resort to eating things we never thought we would, like cactus and tumbleweeds. The dust storms are getting worse and it feels like we're constantly fighting a losing battle against nature. But we're determined to survive. We're doing everything we can to keep our heads above water and help our neighbors do the same. It's a tough road, but we're not giving up.
Journal Entry 3: December 7, 1941
Today, our country was attacked by the Japanese. It's a day that will live in infamy. It's hard to believe that things could get any worse, but they have. The war has plunged us deeper into the Great Depression, as resources are diverted to the war effort. Rationing is now a way of life and everything from food to gasoline is in short supply. It's a struggle to make do with what we have, but we're making it work.
The dust bowl seems like a distant memory now, but we still bear the scars. The land is slowly recovering, but it will never be the same. We've learned to adapt to the changing conditions and to appreciate the little things in life. We've come a long way since the stock market crash of 1929, but we still have a long way to go. The future is uncertain, but we're hopeful that we can build a better world for ourselves and for future generations.
The three journal entries of the Great Depression period are given below:
The Journal EntriesJournal Entry 1: August 1, 1932
Today, I woke up feeling heavy-hearted. It's been years since the stock market crashed and the Great Depression began, but it seems like things keep getting worse. My family and I have been struggling to make ends meet. We've had to cut back on everything, and some days, we don't even have enough to eat. We've had to make do with what we have, and that's not much. The dust bowl hasn't helped things either. Every day, it seems like the dust gets worse. It's hard to breathe, and it's even harder to grow crops. Many farmers have lost everything. I can't help but feel hopeless sometimes, but I try to stay positive. I know that we'll get through this somehow. We have to.
Journal Entry 2: October 10, 1934
Things are getting worse. The dust storms are relentless. They come in waves, one after another, suffocating us and destroying what little we have left. It's hard to imagine life without them. The dust has taken over everything, and it's hard to remember what the world looked like before. The economy is still struggling too. Jobs are scarce, and even when you can find work, the pay is barely enough to survive. My family and I have had to move from place to place, searching for any kind of stability. It's a hard life, but we're not alone. Everyone is in the same boat. We all share the same struggles, the same fears, and the same hopes. We try to help each other out when we can, but there's only so much we can do. We're all just trying to make it through the day.
Journal Entry 3: May 5, 1938
It's been almost a decade since the Great Depression began, and things are finally starting to look up. The dust bowl has mostly passed, and the economy is slowly starting to recover. Jobs are starting to become available again, and people are beginning to feel hopeful about the future. My family and I have managed to hold on through the tough times, and we're starting to see some rewards for our perseverance. We've learned to be resourceful, to make do with what we have, and to be grateful for the little things. The Great Depression has taught us many lessons, and I hope that we don't forget them when times get better. I know that we still have a long way to go, but I feel hopeful that we'll get there. We've come a long way, and we can't give up now.
Read more about the Great Depression here:
https://brainly.com/question/441267
#SPJ1
1. After reading the topics, summarize some of the reasons that global migrations occurred in the
1750-1900 time period:
2. How do you think industrialization played a role in increased migrations in this time period?
3. How did environmental factors play a role in increased migrations in this time period?
4. How do you think global capitalism played a role in increased migrations during this time period?
Answer:
1. Global migrations occurred in the 1750-1900 time period due to various reasons such as economic opportunities, religious persecution, political instability, wars, and natural disasters.
2. Industrialization played a significant role in increased migrations during this time period. As industrialization led to the growth of factories and manufacturing industries, there was a need for more labor. This led to the migration of people from rural areas to urban centers in search of work.
3. Environmental factors such as droughts, floods, famines, and other natural disasters also played a role in increased migrations during this time period. These environmental factors often led to crop failures and food shortages, which forced people to migrate to other areas in search of food and better living conditions.
4. Global capitalism also played a significant role in increased migrations during this time period. The growth of capitalist economies and the search for new markets and resources led to colonization and imperialism. This, in turn, led to the forced migration of people from colonized territories to other parts of the world as laborers or slaves. Additionally, the growth of international trade and commerce led to the migration of skilled laborers and entrepreneurs in search of economic opportunities in other countries.
which industry was most affected by the contributions of howard hughes, sr.?
Howard Hughes Sr. had a major impact on the oil and aviation industries. He founded the Hughes Tool Company and invented the two-cone roller bit, which revolutionized oil drilling, and founded the Hughes Aircraft Company, which developed and manufactured innovative aircraft, missiles, and other aerospace technology.
Howard Hughes, Sr., was most closely associated with the oil and gas industry. Howard Hughes, Sr., was an American businessman who made a significant contribution to the oil and gas sector, which is known as the industry that was most affected by his contributions. The following are some of the major contributions that Howard Hughes, Sr., made to the oil and gas industry:
1. Brought innovative oil drilling techniques into the oil industry.
2. He invented the tri-cone roller bit.
3. Hughes Tool Company (HTC): Hughes was also the founder of the Hughes Tool Company (HTC), which is a firm that specialized in the manufacture of drill bits, and it was this company that made him wealthy.
As a result, Howard Hughes, Sr., significantly contributed to the oil and gas industry with his innovative drilling techniques and the invention of the tri-cone roller bit.
For more such questions on Howard Hughes Sr.
https://brainly.com/question/9263207
#SPJ11
How might your life be different had George iii accepted the olive branch petition
Explanation:
Britain's King George III, however, refused to receive the petition, which, written by John Dickinson, appealed directly to the king and expressed hope for reconciliation between the colonies and Great Britain.
What is the best definition of a "city-
state?"
A. The capital of a kingdom.
B. A palatial complex of buildings that housed a
monarch.
C. An independent, self-governing territory.
city-state, a political device consisting of an unbiased town having sovereignty over contiguous territory and serving as a centre and chief of political, economic, and cultural life.
What is the dictionary definition of city-state?city-state. noun. a kingdom consisting of a sovereign town and its dependencies. Among the most famous are the terrific impartial cities of the historic world, such as Athens, Sparta, Carthage, Thebes, Corinth, and Rome.
A city-state is an independent, self-governing united states contained completely inside the borders of a single city. The ancient empires of Rome, Carthage, Athens, and Sparta are regarded early examples of city-states.
Learn more about city-state here:
https://brainly.com/question/14500968#SPJ1dr kings tome and style contrast with the kinds of political speech we most often hear today. why do you think that is and what does it say about his contect and ourds
Dr. King's speeches were unique in that they were rooted in strong moral values, emphasized the importance of unity, and advocated for nonviolent civil disobedience. His approach stands in stark contrast to the divisive and often partisan language used in modern political discourse. This speaks to the timelessness of Dr. King's message and the continued relevance of his work today.
Dr. King's tone and style contrast with the types of political speech we mostly hear today. Why do you think that is, and what does it say about his context and ours?Dr. King's tone and style differ from the types of political speeches we hear today because his speeches have a more profound and meaningful approach. Dr. King's speeches focused on the human experience rather than the politics of it. The context in which Dr. King gave his speeches was quite different from the context in which political speeches are given today. Dr. King was focused on ensuring civil rights for all individuals, regardless of race, and he used his speeches to inspire and motivate people to work together to achieve this goal.Dr. King's speeches are seen as classic and memorable, and his words still inspire people today. The current political speeches have a negative and partisan approach, which only serves to widen the gap between different groups of people. The current political speeches often lack empathy, and it only highlights the divisive nature of the politics today. It says that Dr. King believed in unity and bringing people together, and he wanted everyone to be treated equally. It says that our current society needs to focus more on inclusivity and empathy, rather than being negative and divisive. Dr. King believed that everyone has the right to be heard and to live in a world that is just and equal, and his speeches have played a significant role in bringing positive change.
For more such questions on civil disobedience
https://brainly.com/question/8144430
#SPJ11
4. This cause of WWI arose from countries joining together for mutual
security.
O Militarism
O Alliances
Imperialism
O Nationalism
The cause of WWI that arose from countries joining together for mutual security is Alliances.
cause of WWI arose from countries -In the early 20th century, European nations formed alliances with each other to create a system of mutual defense in case of war. These alliances led to a complicated web of obligations and commitments, where a small conflict between two nations could quickly escalate into a large-scale war involving multiple countries. The most notable alliances were the Triple Entente, consisting of Britain, France, and Russia, and the Central Powers, consisting of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy. Ultimately, the system of alliances contributed to the outbreak of WWI, as one nation's mobilization for war led to a domino effect of mobilization across Europe.
To know more about outbreak of WWI, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28559086
#SPJ1
who were the first group of people targeted by huac? doctors government workers screenwriters and actors
The first group of people targeted by the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) were screenwriters and actors.
What was the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC)?The House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) was a congressional committee established in 1938 to investigate individuals and organizations with alleged ties to communism. It became more active in the 1940s and 1950s, with a focus on investigating alleged communist influence in the film industry, universities, and government agencies.
Several prominent figures in the entertainment industry, including screenwriters and actors, were called to testify before the committee and were blacklisted for their political views. This led to many people losing their jobs and facing significant personal and professional consequences.
Therefore, the correct answer is: ''Screenwriters and actors.''
See more about HUAC at https://brainly.com/question/1130666.
#SPJ11
HELP PLEASE!!! Imagine you are in Abraham Lincoln’s position - President of the United States during the Civil War. Write a speech to the currently divided nation. You must address the people of both the Union and the Confederacy. You must address the issue of slavery, and what can be done to limit or do away with its practice. You must address preserving the Union for the sake of the country moving forward. Think of this as a call for compromise. As a country moving forward, we must be united.
Requirements in length - 100-word minimum OR 10 sentence minimum
Answer:
My fellow Americans,
We find ourselves in the midst of a great and terrible conflict. Brother against brother, neighbor against neighbor, our nation is torn apart by the ravages of war. The Union is in peril, and the future of our great republic hangs in the balance. But I stand before you today to offer hope, to offer a vision of a better future, a future where we are united as one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Let me be clear: the issue at the heart of this conflict is slavery. It is a blight upon our nation, a stain upon our honor as a people. It is an evil that must be eradicated, and I pledge to you that I will do all in my power to bring it to an end. But we must recognize that this is a complex issue, one that cannot be solved overnight. We must find a way to do away with slavery in a manner that is just and equitable to all parties involved.
To my fellow citizens of the Confederacy, I implore you to reconsider your position. I understand that you believe that you are fighting for your rights, for your way of life. But I ask you to consider the greater good, to think of the future of our country. We must remain united, for the sake of all Americans, regardless of where they were born or what color their skin may be. We are all part of this great experiment in democracy, and we must work together to ensure that it endures.
To my fellow citizens of the Union, I ask that you show compassion and understanding towards those who have taken up arms against us. They are not our enemies, but our brothers and sisters, and we must seek to bring them back into the fold. We must find a way to bridge the gap between us, to build a stronger, more united nation.
In closing, let me say that I believe in the power of compromise. I believe that we can find a way to end this war, to bring an end to slavery, and to preserve the Union for generations to come. But we must be willing to listen to one another, to put aside our differences and work towards a common goal. I ask that you join me in this effort, that we may once again be a nation united, strong, and free.
Thank you, and God bless America.
Explanation:
Early on, Hitler joined the
Answer:
Deutsche Arbeiterpartei aka German Workers' Party
I think thats what your answer should be
Explanation:
Adolf Hitler's rise to power began in the newly established Weimar Republic in September 1919 when Hitler joined the Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (DAP; German Workers' Party). He rose to a place of prominence in the early years of the party.
How is the Indus Valley Civilization and Mesopotamia civilization similar and different?
The Indus Valley Civilization and Mesopotamian civilization share some similarities but also have notable differences. Both civilizations emerged in river valleys, with the Indus Valley.
Similarities:
Both civilizations emerged in river valleys, with the Indus Valley Civilization situated in the Indus River Valley and Mesopotamian civilization situated in the Tigris and Euphrates River Valley.
Both civilizations developed sophisticated irrigation systems to support agriculture and increase food production.
Both civilizations developed writing systems, with the Indus Valley Civilization using a script that is still largely undeciphered, and Mesopotamian civilization developing cuneiform writing.
Both civilizations had extensive trade networks, with evidence of trade goods such as metals, precious stones, and luxury goods found at archaeological sites.
Differences:
The Indus Valley Civilization had a more centralized government and may have been a more egalitarian society compared to the more hierarchical Mesopotamian civilization.
The Indus Valley Civilization had a unique system of urban planning, with grid-like layouts and sophisticated sewage and drainage systems, while Mesopotamian cities were more chaotic and lacked such planning.
The Mesopotamian civilization had a more complex religious and mythological system with a pantheon of gods, while the Indus Valley Civilization's religion is less well understood.
The Indus Valley Civilization had less evidence of warfare and militarization compared to the more warlike Mesopotamian civilization.
Learn more about civilizations here
https://brainly.com/question/29774484
#SPJ4
what does the vishnu schist tell you about the history of the grand canyon prior to the formation of the canyon itself? what is the order of events in the grand canyon? place the following events in the order in which they happened. rank from oldest to most recent events. view available hint(s)for part b resethelp most recent eventoldest event
To know about the history of Grand Canyon before its formation, one should analyze Vishnu Schist. The Vishnu Schist is a thick rock formation present in the Grand Canyon that dates back to Precambrian time.
The age of Vishnu Schist is estimated to be around 2 billion years old. The presence of the Vishnu Schist in the Grand Canyon region indicates that the formation of the Grand Canyon took place after the Vishnu Schist was formed.
Therefore, it is important in reconstructing the geological history of the canyon.Order of events in Grand CanyonThe order of events in the Grand Canyon happened as follows:
Deposition of sedimentary rocks in the Inner GorgeCreation of the Inner GorgeFormation of the Vishnu SchistUplift and tilting of the Grand Canyon region by tectonic forcesErosion of the plateau by the Colorado RiverMost recent event:
Deposition of sedimentary rocks in the Inner GorgeOldest event: Formation of Vishnu Schist.
To know more about Grand Canyon refer here
https://brainly.com/question/13394878#
#SPJ11
The clause iS vague but gives the national government responsibilities_ very broad grant of power t0 carry out it$ enumerated powers full faith and credit supremacy necessary and proper
The Clause you are referring to is the Necessary and Proper Clause, which is part of Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. This clause grants Congress the power to "make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." In other words, this clause grants Congress broad power to make laws necessary to carry out its other powers. The clause is vague but gives the national government responsibilities very broad grant of power to carry out its enumerated powers full faith and credit supremacy necessary and proper is referring to the Elastic Clause
.What is the Elastic Clause?The Elastic Clause refers to a clause in the United States Constitution's Article I, Section 8. It is also called the "Necessary and Proper Clause." The Elastic Clause specifies that Congress has the power to make any legislation that is necessary and proper to carry out the duties of the United States Government.According to the Constitution, the national government has been given limited powers. However, the Elastic Clause allows the government to extend its authority when required. It is known as the Elastic Clause because it allows the government to stretch its powers as and when required. In conclusion, the clause mentioned in the question is referring to the Elastic Clause that provides the national government with broad power to carry out its enumerated powers.
For more such questions on United States
https://brainly.com/question/23497087
#SPJ11
Admitting territories as new states to the Union contributed most to tensions between the North and South by
A. gradually increasing the need for universal suffrage.
B. shifting representation from existing to new states.
C. upsetting the balance between free and slave states.
D. rapidly increasing the need for new roads and bridges.
Answer:
C. upsetting the balance between free and slave states.
Explanation:
Document 5
#The Elementary Education Act, 1870, is a statute which is calculated, more than any other of recent times to elevate the masses of the people and is the result of many years agitation by the various relicious denominationa arul political parties in the State, The object which it wilt acecanplishenay be stated in a very few words. It will place an elementary school wherever there is a child to be taught, whether of rich or poor parents: and it will compel every parent and guardian of a child to have it
Questions :
How will the passage of this act change the workforce in Industrial Britain?
From the information in the document, and your own knowledge, what does this source indicate about the progress of the Industrial Revolution?
Answer:
Hello Cece, i saw your cry for help.
1. The passage of the Elementary Education Act, 1870, would have had a significant impact on the workforce in Industrial Britain. The act made it mandatory for all children between the ages of 5 and 12 to receive an education, which meant that many more children would be attending school instead of working in factories or other industries.
This would have led to a reduction in the number of children working in factories, which would have allowed for greater regulation of working conditions and hours for those who remained in the workforce. With more children receiving an education, there would also have been an increase in the number of skilled workers available in the future, which would have contributed to the growth and development of British industry.
Furthermore, the act would have helped to break the cycle of poverty that existed in many industrial areas, as education was seen as a way out of poverty and into more skilled and higher-paying jobs. This, in turn, would have helped to create a more stable and prosperous society in Industrial Britain.
2. The source specifically discusses the Elementary Education Act, 1870, and its potential impact on the education of children in Industrial Britain. While it does not directly address the progress of the Industrial Revolution, it does suggest that the state and various religious and political groups were concerned about the welfare and education of the working-class population.
The fact that there was a push for a law mandating education for all children, regardless of their socioeconomic background, indicates that there was recognition of the need for a more educated workforce in order to continue industrial growth and development. It also suggests that there was a growing awareness of the negative impact of child labor and a desire to address it through education and other measures.
Overall, the source provides some insight into the social and political context of the Industrial Revolution, but it does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the progress of the Industrial Revolution itself.
Explanation:
i hve never been wrong in my life! (*/ω＼*)
How did the industrial revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries transform society?
The industrial revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries brought about significant changes in society. It is worth noting that there were three industrial revolutions that spanned across the world.
These revolutions brought about significant developments that led to economic, political, and social transformation across the world.
What were the major changes brought about by the industrial revolutions?1. Economic transformation - The first industrial revolution (1760-1840) ushered in new technological advancements in the textile industry. The use of water power and steam engines revolutionized production, leading to increased productivity and efficiency. Factories became more widespread, leading to the establishment of industrial capitalism.
2. Social transformation - The industrial revolutions led to urbanization, as people moved to towns to work in factories. This led to the growth of cities and the emergence of a working-class. Women and children were also recruited into factories, leading to the transformation of family structures.
3. Political transformation - The industrial revolutions led to the rise of the middle class, leading to demands for representation and democracy. The revolutions led to the end of the old feudal system and the rise of constitutional monarchies.
The revolutions also led to the emergence of new political ideologies, including communism and socialism.
Conclusively, the industrial revolutions brought about significant changes across the world, leading to economic, social, and political transformation.
To know more about industrial revolutions, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/855594#
#SPJ11
b) explain one way in which the mass destruction of specific populations impacted societies after world war ii.
One way in which the mass destruction of specific populations impacted societies after World War II was by creating a demographic, environmental, psychological, and historical trauma, pain, fear, terror, and instability in people.
When a specific group of people is targeted for mass destruction, it can lead to the destruction of their social and cultural values. Which could include damage of their homes and their physical environment, and can take years or even decades to rebuild.
The consequences of violencePeople who experienced such violence and loss of their loved ones may suffer from PTSD and other psychological disorders. This can lead to behavioral changes, such as fear, anger, and even violence. The societal impact of mass destruction can be immense and long-lasting, often leading to generational trauma.
Learn more about World War II: https://brainly.com/question/3411906
#SPJ11
The Shocking Cynicism Behind the Voyage of the “St. Louis” and Its Ship Full of Jewish Refugees from Nazi Germany
What is the author referring to when he says, “And if a few thousand Nazi collaborators ended up in the US refugee potpourri, better them than Jews, who belonged in Palestine?”
What is the “shocking cynicism” that the author refers to in the title of the article?
Answer:
\ The author is referring to the belief held by some in the US government at the time that Jewish refugees from Nazi Germany were not a priority and that it was more important to focus on admitting refugees who were deemed politically favorable, such as those who were anti-Nazi or potential allies in the war effort. The author suggests that this attitude led to a lack of action on the part of the US government to help the Jewish refugees aboard the St. Louis, and instead they were turned away and sent back to Europe.
Explanation:
briefly explain one example of how religion and science were a source of conflict in american society during the 1920s. b) briefly explain one development during the 1920s that changed attitudes toward prohibition. c) briefly explain one important difference in the immigrant legislation of the 1920s in comparison to earlier periods.
a) The conflict between religion and science in American society during the 1920s can be exemplified by the Scopes Monkey Trial. The trial was a court case held in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925, where a high school biology teacher named John Scopes was accused of violating the Butler Act, which prohibited the teaching of evolution in schools. The case became a national spectacle and pitted proponents of evolution against those who believed in the literal interpretation of the Bible. Although Scopes was found guilty and fined $100, the trial brought the issue of evolution to the forefront of American public discourse and highlighted the tensions between science and religion.
b) One development during the 1920s that changed attitudes toward prohibition was the rise of organized crime. Prohibition, which banned the sale and consumption of alcohol, was enacted in 1919 with the ratification of the 18th Amendment. However, the law was widely flouted, and many people continued to drink and buy alcohol illegally. Organized crime syndicates, such as the mafia, saw an opportunity to profit from the demand for alcohol and began to smuggle and sell it on a large scale. This led to an increase in violence and corruption, and many Americans began to view prohibition as a failure.
c) An important difference in the immigrant legislation of the 1920s in comparison to earlier periods was the introduction of quotas. The Immigration Act of 1924 established a quota system that limited the number of immigrants who could enter the United States from each country. The quotas were based on the percentage of each nationality that was already present in the United States in 1890, which favored immigrants from Northern and Western Europe and restricted those from Southern and Eastern Europe. This marked a departure from earlier policies that had favored open immigration and reflected a growing nativist sentiment in American society.
For more such questions on American society
https://brainly.com/question/13323062
#SPJ11
as demonstrated during the ukraine uprising, which best shows the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level?
The documentation of events on a grassroots level during the Ukraine uprising allowed for the dissemination of information that may have been suppressed or distorted by traditional media outlets (option A).
Social media and citizen journalists provided real-time updates and footage of the protests, allowing for a global audience to witness the events as they unfolded. This helped to galvanize international support for the protesters and put pressure on the Ukrainian government to address their grievances. Additionally, the documentation of police brutality and human rights violations helped to hold those responsible accountable for their actions.
Overall, the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level during the Ukraine uprising include increased transparency, accountability, and support for social and political change.
Option A is the correct answer.
"
Complete quesion
As demonstrated during the ukraine uprising, which best shows the benefits of documenting events on a grassroots level?
A- The documentation of events on a grassroots level.
B- The hindrance of events.
"
You can learn more about Ukraine uprising at
https://brainly.com/question/26824054
#SPJ11
