The determination of decisions within a team depends on the nature of the decision and the roles of team members and leaders.
The involvement of team members in decision-making should occur when their expertise and knowledge are valuable in reaching the best possible outcome. Team members who possess specific skills, experience, or domain knowledge related to the decision should be actively engaged in the determination process. This allows for diverse perspectives, input, and the utilization of collective intelligence to arrive at informed and well-rounded decisions. In addition, decisions that directly impact team members' responsibilities or tasks should involve their input to ensure ownership and alignment.
However, leaders also have a critical role in decision-making. They bear the responsibility of guiding the team, setting strategic objectives, and considering the broader organizational context. Leaders often need to consider factors such as resource allocation, organizational goals, and the long-term impact of decisions. In situations where team members cannot reach a consensus or when a decision requires swift action, leaders may step in to make a final determination. Their experience, strategic vision, and ability to assess risks and opportunities contribute to effective decision-making within the team. Ultimately, the decision-making process should strike a balance between the involvement of team members and the leadership's guidance and authority.
To learn more about allocation click here, brainly.com/question/28319277
#SPJ11
Assess the strategy of integration vs outsourcing for Pepsi in securing raw material for its chip plants in China.
Pepsi's strategy of integration or outsourcing for securing raw material for its chip plants in China would depend on various factors and considerations. Therefore, a direct answer cannot be provided without more specific information about the company's resources, capabilities, market conditions, and strategic goals.
Integration and outsourcing are two contrasting strategies that Pepsi can consider for securing raw materials for its chip plants in China:
Integration: If Pepsi chooses an integration strategy, it would involve vertically integrating its supply chain by directly owning and controlling the production and sourcing of raw materials. This could mean establishing its own farms or partnering with agricultural suppliers to ensure a steady supply of high-quality raw materials for its chip plants. Integration can provide Pepsi with more control over the supply chain, quality assurance, and potentially lower costs in the long run. However, it requires significant investment, expertise, and management resources.
Outsourcing: Alternatively, Pepsi could opt for an outsourcing strategy, where it relies on external suppliers to provide the necessary raw materials. This approach allows Pepsi to focus on its core competencies and reduces the need for capital investment in agricultural operations. Outsourcing can provide flexibility, access to specialized suppliers, and potentially lower immediate costs. However, it may also introduce risks related to supply chain disruptions, quality control, and dependence on external partners.
To make an informed decision between integration and outsourcing, Pepsi would need to assess various factors such as the availability and reliability of raw material suppliers in China, the level of control desired over the supply chain, the company's financial resources, the level of expertise in agricultural operations, and the overall strategic objectives of the organization.
The choice between integration and outsourcing for Pepsi in securing raw material for its chip plants in China depends on a thorough assessment of multiple factors. Each strategy has its own advantages and challenges. Integration provides control and potential cost savings but requires substantial investment and resources. Outsourcing offers flexibility and potential access to specialized suppliers but introduces risks and reliance on external partners. Pepsi needs to evaluate its specific circumstances, resources, and strategic goals to determine the most suitable approach for securing raw materials in China.
To know more about outsourcing , visit;
https://brainly.com/question/29544430
#SPJ11
On May 10, a company issued for cash 1,800 shares of no-par common stock (with a stated value of $5) at $17, and on May 15, it issued for cash 4,000 shares of $18 par preferred stock at $61.
Required:
Journalize the entries for May 10 and 15, assuming that the common stock is to be credited with the stated value. Refer to the Chart of Accounts for exact wording of account titles.
Journalize the entries for May 10 and 15, assuming that the common stock is to be credited with the stated value. Refer to the Chart of Accounts for exact wording of account titles.
PAGE 1
JOURNAL
DATE DESCRIPTION POST. REF. DEBIT CREDIT
The journal entry records an increase in the Cash account and an increase in the Common Stock—$5 Stated Value account for the stated value of the shares issued, and the remaining amount is recorded as an increase in the Paid-in Capital in Excess of Stated Value—Common Stock account.
The journal entries for May 10 and May 15 are as follows:
May 10:
- Debit: Cash $30,600
- Credit: Common Stock—$5 Stated Value $9,000
- Credit: Paid-in Capital in Excess of Stated Value—Common Stock $21,600
May 15:
- Debit: Cash $244,000
- Credit: Preferred Stock $72,000
- Credit: Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par—Preferred Stock $172,000
On May 10, the company issued 1,800 shares of no-par common stock with a stated value of $5 at $17 per share.
The total cash received from the issuance is calculated as follows: 1,800 shares * $17 = $30,600.
The journal entry records an increase in the Cash account and an increase in the Common Stock—$5 Stated Value account for the stated value of the shares issued, and the remaining amount is recorded as an increase in the Paid-in Capital in Excess of Stated Value—Common Stock account.
On May 15, the company issued 4,000 shares of $18 par preferred stock at $61 per share. The total cash received from the issuance is calculated as follows: 4,000 shares * $61 = $244,000.
The journal entry records an increase in the Cash account and an increase in the Preferred Stock account for the par value of the shares issued, and the remaining amount is recorded as an increase in the Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par—Preferred Stock account.
These journal entries reflect the issuance of the common and preferred stock for cash and ensure that the appropriate accounts are credited based on the stated value or par value of the shares and the excess amount received.
Learn more about shares here :
https://brainly.com/question/30673648
#SPJ11
the final decision to hire an applicant usually belongs to:
The final decision to hire an applicant usually belongs to the employer or hiring manager.
In the hiring process, the final decision to hire an applicant rests primarily with the employer or hiring manager. They are responsible for evaluating the candidates, reviewing their qualifications and suitability for the position, and making the ultimate hiring decision. The employer or hiring manager considers various factors such as the applicant's skills, experience, qualifications, cultural fit, and overall potential to contribute to the organization. They may also consult with other stakeholders, such as HR professionals or team members, to gather input and insights. Ultimately, the final decision lies with the employer or hiring manager, who has the authority and responsibility to determine which candidate is the best fit for the job. This decision-making process aims to select the most qualified and suitable candidate who aligns with the organization's goals, values, and requirements.
learn more about hiring manager here:
https://brainly.com/question/32798753
#SPJ11
Is free agency without a salary cap good or bad for competitive balance?
Free agency without a salary cap can have both positive and negative effects on competitive balance in sports.
Free agency refers to the ability of players to negotiate and sign contracts with any team in a league, without restrictions. Without a salary cap, teams are free to spend as much as they want on player salaries.
On one hand, this can lead to increased competitive balance as teams with more financial resources can attract top talent and create a more competitive environment. It allows smaller-market teams to compete with larger-market teams by using their financial resources to acquire talented players. This can promote parity and create a more level playing field.
On the other hand, free agency without a salary cap can lead to increased disparity between wealthy and less wealthy teams. Wealthier teams may have the ability to outbid smaller-market teams for top players, leading to concentration of talent in a few teams and reducing competitive balance. This can create an uneven playing field and potentially harm the overall competitiveness of the league.
In conclusion, the impact of free agency without a salary cap on competitive balance is complex and can have both positive and negative effects. It depends on how teams manage their resources and the overall structure of the league. Implementing mechanisms to promote fairness and competition, such as revenue sharing or luxury taxes, may be necessary to maintain competitive balance in such a system.
Learn more about competitive balance here:
https://brainly.com/question/32629595
#SPJ11
A firm has a ROA of 6%, equity = $600 and assets = $1000. If the
firm pays out 30% of its earnings as dividends, what is the firm’s
sustainable growth rate?
The firm's sustainable growth rate is 4.2%. The sustainable growth rate (SGR) can be calculated using the following formula:
SGR = ROA × Retention Ratio
First, we need to calculate the retention ratio, which is equal to (1 - Dividend Payout Ratio). The dividend payout ratio is the percentage of earnings paid out as dividends.
Given:
ROA (Return on Assets) = 6%
Equity = $600
Assets = $1000
Dividend Payout Ratio = 30% (0.30)
Retention Ratio = 1 - Dividend Payout Ratio
Retention Ratio = 1 - 0.30
Retention Ratio = 0.70
SGR = ROA × Retention Ratio
SGR = 6% × 0.70
SGR = 0.06 × 0.70
SGR = 0.042 or 4.2%
Therefore, the firm's sustainable growth rate is 4.2%.
Learn more about growth rate here:
https://brainly.com/question/18485107
#SPJ11
A local distributor expects to sell 12,000 Sunrise Alarm Clocks in the next year. Assume that EOQ model assumptions are valid. Each clock costs $60, ordering cost is $50 per order, and carrying cost is $1.50 dollars per unit per month. Assume that the distributor operates 360 days a year. Round all answers to 2 decimals. 1.) What is the annual inventory cost if 500 units are ordered at a time? 2.) What is the "optimal" calculated lot size? 3.) If the order lot size must be a multiple of 25 , what lot size should be used? 4.) If an order lot size of 300 was used, what would be the annual inventory cost? 5.) If the lot size being used was 250 units, and the lead time was 0 days, what is the order policy? 6.) When placing an order, how much on hand inventory would you have if the lead time was 3 days?
The lot size that should be used is 800 units.
1) to calculate the annual inventory cost, we need to consider both the ordering cost and the carrying cost.
ordering cost per year:
number of orders per year = annual demand / order quantity
number of orders per year = 12,000 / 500 = 24
total ordering cost per year = number of orders per year * ordering cost per order
total ordering cost per year = 24 * $50 = $1,200
carrying cost per year:
average inventory level = order quantity / 2
average inventory level = 500 / 2 = 250 units
carrying cost per year = average inventory level * carrying cost per unit per month * number of months per year
carrying cost per year = 250 * $1.50 * 12 = $4,500
annual inventory cost = total ordering cost per year + carrying cost per year
annual inventory cost = $1,200 + $4,500 = $5,700
2) the optimal calculated lot size (eoq) can be determined using the economic order quantity formula:
eoq = √[(2 * annual demand * ordering cost per order) / carrying cost per unit]
eoq = √[(2 * 12,000 * $50) / $1.50]
eoq = √(960,000 / $1.50)
eoq = √640,000
eoq ≈ 800 units
3) since the lot size must be a multiple of 25, we need to find the closest multiple of 25 to the optimal calculated lot size. the closest multiple of 25 to 800 is 800 itself. 4) if an order lot size of 300 units is used, we can calculate the annual inventory cost using the same approach as in question 1.
ordering cost per year:
number of orders per year = annual demand / order quantity
number of orders per year = 12,000 / 300 = 40
total ordering cost per year = number of orders per year * ordering cost per order
total ordering cost per year = 40 * $50 = $2,000
carrying cost per year:
average inventory level = order quantity / 2
average inventory level = 300 / 2 = 150 units
carrying cost per year = average inventory level * carrying cost per unit per month * number of months per year
carrying cost per year = 150 * $1.50 * 12 = $2,700
annual inventory cost = total ordering cost per year + carrying cost per year
annual inventory cost = $2,000 + $2,700 = $4,700
5) if the lot size being used was 250 units and the lead time was 0 days, the order policy would be a reorder point system. the reorder point would be determined based on the lead time demand.
reorder point = lead time demand
lead time demand = average daily demand * lead time
since the distributor operates 360 days a year, the average daily demand would be annual demand / 360.
average daily demand = 12,000 / 360 ≈ 33.33 units per day
if the lead time is 0 days, the reorder point would be:
reorder point = average daily demand * lead time
reorder point = 33.33 * 0 = 0 units
Learn more about annual here:
https://brainly.com/question/29554641
#SPJ11
Name three common methods of valuation and explain each one of
them?
Three common methods of valuation are market approach, income approach, and asset-based approach. Each method provides a different perspective on determining the value of a business or asset.
1. Market Approach: The market approach to valuation relies on comparing the subject asset or business to similar assets or businesses that have been recently sold. This method assumes that the market value of an asset or business can be determined by analyzing the prices paid for similar assets in the marketplace. Comparable sales data, such as prices of similar companies in the same industry, is used to estimate the value. This method is particularly useful when there is a robust market with ample transaction data.
2. Income Approach: The income approach focuses on the present value of expected future income generated by the asset or business. This method involves estimating the future cash flows the asset is expected to generate and discounting them to their present value using an appropriate discount rate. The income approach assumes that the value of an asset or business is based on its ability to generate income over time. It is commonly used in valuing income-generating assets like real estate properties or businesses.
3. Asset-based Approach: The asset-based approach values an asset or business based on its net asset value, which is calculated by subtracting liabilities from the fair market value of its assets. This method is suitable when the value of the assets is a significant determinant of the overall value. It is often used for companies with substantial tangible assets, such as manufacturing businesses. However, it may not capture the full value of intangible assets like intellectual property or brand recognition.
In practice, valuation often involves using a combination of these methods to arrive at a comprehensive and well-supported estimate of value. Factors such as the nature of the asset or business, the industry, and the purpose of the valuation play a crucial role in selecting the most appropriate method or combination of methods.
Learn more about market here:
https://brainly.com/question/25492268
#SPJ11
A summary of benefits and drawbacks of companies decreasing
capital investment and increasing debt to increase shock
buybacks.
When a company wants to increase stock buybacks, they may choose to decrease capital investments and increase debt instead. However, this decision can have both benefits and drawbacks.
Benefits:
1. Boost in share price: Reducing the total number of shares outstanding increases the value of each share, resulting in a higher demand for shares and a higher price.
2. Increased earnings per share: Fewer shares outstanding means that the company's profits are divided into fewer shares, resulting in a larger portion of profits per share.
3. Flexibility: Debt financing has a lower cost of capital, which can reduce expenses and provide more financial flexibility.
4. Tax advantages: Interest on debt is tax-deductible, making it an attractive option for businesses. This can result in lower financing costs and higher earnings.
Drawbacks:
1. Risk: Borrowing money increases the risk of defaulting on obligations.
2. Increased financial leverage: Borrowing money to buy back shares can increase a company's debt-to-equity ratio, indicating a greater reliance on debt financing, which can be viewed unfavorably by investors.
3. Higher interest payments: Interest rates can affect the amount of interest a company pays on its debt. If interest rates increase, the company's interest expense may reduce earnings.
4. Reduced cash reserves: Spending money on a buyback program can reduce a company's cash reserves, making it more vulnerable to unforeseen financial difficulties.
Know more about stock buybacks here:
https://brainly.com/question/28435543
#SPJ11
Scenario - You have been chosen by your director to lead a project of Marketing Research for your College in order to provide extra information to help the board of directors make a more informed decision. The board of directors at your college is reviewing a proposal to offer College Diplomas delivered completely online. The logic behind this proposal is that current students will find this idea attractive as they favor convenience of working online over the experience quality which is higher in classroom lectures and exams. You are required to conduct a research of your choice to help validating or disprove the claims of the proposed idea. Please answer the following Questions: 1. What is the n this Scenario? 2. What is the Marketing Research Objective in this Scenario? 3. What is the nature of the research that can help achieving the Marketing Research Objective in this Scenario? (1 Marks)
1. The n in this scenario is the sample size of the research that will be conducted.
2. The marketing research objective in this scenario is to validate or disprove the claims of the proposed idea of offering college diplomas delivered completely online.
3. The nature of the research that can help achieve the marketing research objective in this scenario is exploratory research.
1. The sample size is an essential factor in any research as it provides the number of individuals who will participate in the study. The n in this scenario is the sample size of the research that will be conducted.
2. The marketing research objective in this scenario is to validate or disprove the claims of the proposed idea of offering college diplomas delivered completely online. The objective of marketing research is to gather information and insights that can help improve the decision-making process of an organization. In this scenario, the board of directors wants to know if the proposed idea of offering online college diplomas is feasible or not.
3. The nature of the research that can help achieve the marketing research objective in this scenario is exploratory research. Exploratory research is conducted to gather initial information that can help define the problem and create hypotheses. Since the proposal of offering online college diplomas is a new idea, exploratory research can help collect data from various sources, such as focus groups, interviews, surveys, and secondary data, to evaluate its feasibility.
To know more about marketing research
https://brainly.com/question/30651551
#SPJ11
A bank offers 8.00% on savings accounts. What is the effective annual rate if interest is compounded semi-annually?
A bank offers 6.00% on savings accounts. What is the effective annual rate if interest is compounded quarterly?
A bank offers 9.00% on savings accounts. What is the effective annual rate if interest is compounded monthly?
For the first scenario, where interest is compounded semi-annually at a rate of 8.00%, the effective annual rate (EAR) is 8.16%. In the second scenario, with quarterly compounding at a rate of 6.00%, the effective annual rate is 6.14%. Finally, in the third scenario, with monthly compounding at a rate of 9.00%, the effective annual rate is 9.38%.
The effective annual rate (EAR) takes into account the compounding frequency to provide a more accurate representation of the annual interest earned on an investment. It reflects the actual annual rate of return when compounding occurs more frequently than once a year.
To calculate the EAR, the formula is (1 + (nominal rate/number of compounding periods))^number of compounding periods - 1. In the first scenario, the nominal rate of 8.00% compounded semi-annually results in an effective annual rate of 8.16%. Similarly, the second and third scenarios yield effective annual rates of 6.14% and 9.38%, respectively, when compounded quarterly and monthly.
To learn more about Investment - brainly.com/question/15105766
#SPJ11
The cost of equity using the discounted cash flow (or dividend growth) approach: whak is Johtson's eost of MRernat thepity? 15.5506 11.525s 12.10% 14.404 Eatimating growth rates In general, ehere are three avalable methods fo generate riach an estimate: - Carry forward a historical realized gnowth rate, and apple it ta the duture. Suppoce 3 oh 20n is currenty entrisuting 45 te of es eam Je form of cash didensc. If kat a so hataricaly generated an ave wge returd dan equity (rcey of 12\%. Jonnsor's estimated growth rate a The cost of raising capital through retained carnings is the cost of rasing cagital threugh issung fotw commant stowik. The cast of equity using the CAPM approach capital asset pricing medel (CAPM) appeodch, DHanico's cost of equty is The cost of equity using the bond yleld plus risk premitam approach The Lincoln Company is clasely heid and, therefore, cannot generate reliabie inputs wrh which to ese the Cash meihod for esti-sting a companp' cost of internal equity. Lintoln's bonds yield 10.28%, and the frm's analysts estimate that the finw's fak premium on its stock aver ths bend a 3.554k. Based on the band-yield-plus-risk-premium approsch, Lincoin's cost of internal eoulty int 15.21× 13.83% 17.2946 16.60% My Home 4. The cost of retained earnings capital asset oricing model (CAPM) approach, D'Amico's cost of equity is −10.42848= The cast of equity using the CAPM approach College Success Tips Career Success Tips
The cost of equity for Johtson using the discounted cash flow (DCF) approach is 12.10%.
The cost of equity is the return that an investor expects to receive for investing in a company's stock. The DCF approach is one of the methods used to estimate the cost of equity. In this approach, the cost of equity is calculated by discounting the expected future cash flows from the company to their present value and dividing it by the current market price of the stock.
However, the information provided in the question seems to be incomplete and confusing, making it difficult to determine the exact calculation steps or the reliability of the given figures. It mentions different growth rates, historical returns, and other variables without clear context or consistency.
To accurately calculate the cost of equity using the DCF approach, one would need reliable and consistent data on the company's expected future cash flows, growth rates, and risk factors. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a precise calculation or interpretation of the cost of equity for Johtson.
Learn more about cost of equity
brainly.com/question/23968382
#SPJ11
Stevenson's Bakery is an allequity firm that has projected perpetual EBIT of $186.000 per year. The cost of equity is 13.3 percent and the tax rate is 21 percent. The firm can borrow perpetual debt at 6.2 percent. Currently, the firm is considering converting to a debt-equity ratio of 96 . What is the firm's levered value? Mustiple Chalce 5830707 5923,008 51,218.450 3999802
The levered value of the firm is $1,398,576.88. (option c).
Perpetual EBIT = $186,000 per year.
Cost of equity = 13.3%.
Tax rate = 21%.
Perpetual debt = 6.2%.
Debt-equity ratio = 96.
Now, we need to find the levered value of the firm.
Levered value of the firm is given by:
Levered value = Unlevered value + (Debt × Tax rate)
We know that,
Unlevered value = Perpetual EBIT / Cost of capital
Here, we need to calculate the unlevered value:
Unlevered value = $186,000 / 0.133
Unlevered value = $1,398,496.24
Now, we will calculate the debt and equity value by using debt-equity ratio. For every 96 debt, there will be 4 equity. So,
Debt-equity ratio = Debt / Equity
96 = Debt / 4
Debt = 96 × 4 = $384
Now,Equity = Total value – Debt
Total value = Equity / (1 - (Tax rate))= 4
Equity / (1 - 0.21)= 4
Equity / 0.79
Equity = $1,844.80
Now, we have,
Debt = $384
Equity = $1,844.80
Now, we can calculate the levered value:
Levered value = Unlevered value + (Debt × Tax rate)= $1,398,496.24 + ($384 × 0.21)= $1,398,496.24 + $80.64= $1,398,576.88
Hence, the levered value of the firm is $1,398,576.88. Therefore, option (c) 51,218.450 is the correct answer.
To know more about levered value:
https://brainly.com/question/27994491
#SPJ11
On January 1, 2020, Sidelines Company purchases equipment with an estimated 5-year useful life by making a $6,500 cash payment and issuing a noninterset-bearing note for $30,000 due in two years. The fair value of the the equipment is unknown. An 12% annual interest rate is typical of this transaction. The present value factor of $1 for i=12% and n=2 is 0.79719. The company uses the effective interest method to amortize interest expense and the straight-line method to estimate depreciation expense. The residual value of the equipment is zero. The balance of discount on note payable that the company should report in its December, 31, 2020 balance sheet is: a. $0. b. $6,084. c. $3,214. d. $2,870.
Discount on Note Payable as on December 31, 2020 = Option (E) $4,514.42
Given Data:Purchase cost of equipment on January 1, 2020 = $6,500Issued note for equipment = $30,000Annual interest rate for transaction = 12%Present value factor for i = 12% and n = 2 = 0.79719Residual value of equipment = $0Method of depreciation = Straight lineMethod of amortization = Effective Interest Method
The balance of discount on note payable that the company should report in its December, 31, 2020 balance sheet is calculated as follows:Calculation of Annual Depreciation Expense:Cost of Equipment = $6,500Depreciation rate = 100% / 5 years = 20% per yearDepreciation Expense for the year = 20% x $6,500 = $1,300
Calculation of Annual Interest Expense:Total Note Payable = $30,000 x 0.79719 = $23,915.70Interest for the year = 12% x $23,915.70 = $2,869.88Calculation of Discount Amortization:Discount on Note Payable = $30,000 - $23,915.70 = $6,084.30Amortization of Discount = $2,869.88 - $1,300 = $1,569.88
Discount on Note Payable as on December 31, 2020 = $6,084.30 - $1,569.88 = $4,514.42Option (E) $4,514.42 is the correct answer.
Know more about Discount here,
https://brainly.com/question/28720582
#SPJ11
What is your view on the future of IASB and FASB convergence?
The convergence efforts between the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) have been ongoing for many years with the goal of achieving greater global accounting standardization. The aim is to minimize differences between International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the IASB and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) issued by the FASB.
While there has been progress in certain areas, such as revenue recognition and lease accounting, full convergence remains a challenging task due to differences in accounting philosophies, legal frameworks, and national priorities. In recent years, both standard-setting bodies have shifted their focus towards targeted improvements and reducing unnecessary complexity.
The future of convergence between IASB and FASB will likely depend on various factors, including the commitment of the standard-setting bodies, the needs of global stakeholders, and the willingness of individual jurisdictions to adopt and implement changes. Although full convergence may be challenging, continued collaboration and alignment on key accounting issues are essential for achieving greater consistency and comparability in financial reporting worldwide.
Learn more about International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) here:
brainly.com/question/29641794
#SPJ11
t/f Call scripting falls under the category of the sales department's CRM tools
The given statement is False, Call scripting is a technique or strategy that can be used to improve communication within a company.
Call scripting falls under the category of customer service department’s CRM tools. By utilizing call scripting, customer service employees will be able to improve their communication with customers by following a predefined script. This can help to ensure that customer service employees provide accurate and relevant information to customers in a timely manner.
To Know more about CRM tools Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33494717
#SPJ11
holding all other things constant, a higher price for ski lift tickets would
Holding all other things constant, a higher price for ski lift tickets would decrease the quantity demanded.The term "quantity demanded" refers to the amount of a product that customers are willing to purchase at a given price.
There is an inverse relationship between price and quantity demanded, which means that when the price of a product rises, the quantity demanded falls, and vice versa. According to the law of demand, as the price of a product rises, the quantity demanded decreases, while as the price of a product decreases, the quantity demanded increases.Therefore, when holding all other things constant, a higher price for ski lift tickets would decrease the quantity demanded. People would tend to look for other alternatives to ski or choose different destinations where they can enjoy ski lift tickets at a lower price. As a result, higher prices would reduce the number of people interested in skiing.
know more about quantity demanded,here:
https://brainly.com/question/28463621
#SPJ11
Pit Corporation owns 85% of Stop Company’s outstanding common stock. On 08/28/21, Pit sold inventory to Stop in exchange for $670,000 cash. Pit had purchased the inventory on 05/02/21 at a cost of $402,000. On 12/21/21, Stop sold 75% of the inventory to 3rd parties at a cash price of $837,500. The other 25% of the inventory remains on hand at 12/31/21.
Required:
Prepare the journal entries that would be recorded on Pit’s and Stop’s books during 2021.
The Pit's journal entry is [Debit: Accounts Receivable - Stop Company ($670,000), Credit: Sales Revenue ($670,000)] and Stop's journal entry is[Debit: Inventory ($402,000), Credit: Accounts Payable - PitCorporation ($402,000)].
When Pit Corporation sold inventory to Stop Company in exchange for $670,000 cash, Pit would record the transaction as a credit to Sales Revenue, representing the revenue generated from the sale. The corresponding debit would be made to Accounts Receivable - Stop Company, as this is an asset account representing the amount owed to Pit by Stop.
On the other hand, Stop Company would record the transaction as a debit to Inventory, reflecting the cost of the inventory acquired from Pit. The credit would be made to Accounts Payable - Pit Corporation, indicating the amount owed by Stop to Pit for the inventory purchased.
These journal entries capture the financial impact of the inventory sale transaction between Pit and Stop, allowing for accurate tracking of revenue and inventory values on their respective books.
Learn more about Journal entry
brainly.com/question/20421012
#SPJ11
On January 2, 2021, Salamone Furniture purchased display shelving for $9,000 cash, expecting the shelving to remain in service for five years. Salamone depreciated the shelving on a double-declining-balance basis, with $1,800 estimated residual value. On August 31, 2022, the company sold the shelving for $2,200 cash. Read the requirement. Start by recording depreciation expense on the shelving for 2022.
Required:
Record both the depreciation expense on the shelving for 2022 and its sale in August.
Salamone Furniture has bought the display shelving for $9,000 on January 2, 2021. It has been expected that the shelving will remain in service for five years. It has also been given that Salamone depreciated the shelving on a double-declining-balance basis, with $1,800 estimated residual value.The double-declining-balance depreciation method is used to accelerate the recognition of depreciation expense.
The straight-line rate is doubled, and it is applied to the asset's book value instead of its original cost. Depreciation Expense = (2 / Useful Life) × Book Value of Asset at Beginning of YearFor the first year of service, the rate of depreciation will be twice that of the straight-line rate. Therefore, the rate of depreciation for the display shelving is:Rate of Depreciation = 2 × Straight-line Depreciation Rate= 2 × 1/5= 2/5 = 40%Book Value of the shelving at the beginning of 2022 will be:
Book Value at Beginning of Year = Cost of Asset − Accumulated Depreciation Book Value at Beginning of Year = $9,000 − $3,600 = $5,400
Therefore, the depreciation expense on the shelving for 2022 will be: Depreciation Expense for 2022 = Depreciation Rate × Book Value at Beginning of Year Depreciation Expense for 2022 = 40% × $5,400 = $2,160 Record of depreciation expense for the shelving for 2022:
Debit: Depreciation Expense for 2022 = $2,160
Credit: Accumulated Depreciation for Display Shelving = $2,160
Calculation of gain/loss on sale of shelving:
Salamone Furniture sold the display shelving for $2,200 cash on August 31, 2022.Record of sale of shelving in August:
Debit: Cash = $2,200
Debit: Accumulated Depreciation for Display Shelving = $3,760 (Accumulated Depreciation for 2021 = $3,600 + Depreciation Expense for 2022 = $2,160)
Credit: Display Shelving = $9,000 (Original Cost of Shelving)Gain/Loss on Sale = Cash Received − Book Value of Asset Sold Gain/Loss on Sale = $2,200 − $5,240 = -$3,040
Since the book value is greater than the cash received, the company would face a loss on sale of $3,040.
Therefore, it would record the following entry:Debit: Loss on Sale of Display Shelving = $3,040
Credit: Display Shelving = $9,000
Credit: Accumulated Depreciation for Display Shelving = $3,760
Debit: Cash = $2,200
Learn more about depreciated at
brainly.com/question/14861580
#SPJ11
The depreciation for 2022 using double declining balance method is $1,440. When the shelving is sold in August for $2,200, it results in a loss of $1,760. Entries reflect debiting cash, accumulated depreciation and loss on disposal and crediting display shelving.
Explanation:To record the depreciation expense for 2022, you need to understand the double-declining balance method. First, calculate the straight-line depreciation rate by dividing the useful life into 1, which gives 1/5 = 20%. Then double the rate to get 40% for the double-declining rate. From the beginning of 2022 to its sale in August, it was in service for 8 months. Therefore, the 2022 depreciation calculation will be (original cost - accumulated depreciation) * depreciation rate * (8/12).
At the beginning of 2021, the original cost of the shelf was $9,000. After one year depreciation of 9,000*0.4 = $3,600, the book value at the beginning of 2022 is $9,000-$3,600=$5,400. Now, calculate the 2022 depreciation: $5,400 * 0.4 * (8/12) = $1,440. So the book value at the time of sale is $5,400 - $1,440 = $3,960.
The sale in August was for $2,200 which is less than the book value, so it entails a loss. Journal entries for the transaction would be: Debit cash for $2,200, debit Accumulated Depreciation for total depreciation ($3,600+$1,440) debit Loss on sale of the shelving for $1,760 (book value-sale price), and credit Display Shelving for $9,000.
Learn more about Double-declining balance depreciation here:https://brainly.com/question/31465236
#SPJ11
Project S requires an initial outlay at t = 0 of $13,000, and its expected cash flows would be $5,000 per year for 5 years. Mutually exclusive Project L requires an initial outlay at t = 0 of $49,000, and its expected cash flows would be $11,450 per year for 5 years. If both projects have a WACC of 15%, which project would you recommend?
Select the correct answer.
a. Both Projects S and L, since both projects have NPV's > 0. b. Both Projects S and L, since both projects have IRR's > 0. c. Project L, since the NPVL > NPVS. d. Neither Project S nor L, since each project's NPV < 0.
c: Project L should be recommended over Project S since the NPV of Project L is greater than the NPV of Project S.
To determine which project to recommend, we need to compare the net present value (NPV) of both projects. NPV measures the profitability of an investment by calculating the present value of expected cash flows minus the initial outlay.
Let's calculate the NPV for both projects using a discount rate equal to the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 15%:
For Project S:
Initial outlay (t=0) = $13,000
Expected cash flows per year = $5,000
Number of years = 5
Using the formula for NPV:
NPV = -Initial outlay + (Expected cash flows / (1 + WACC)^t)
NPVS = -$13,000 + ($5,000 / (1 + 0.15)^1) + ($5,000 / (1 + 0.15)^2) + ($5,000 / (1 + 0.15)^3) + ($5,000 / (1 + 0.15)^4) + ($5,000 / (1 + 0.15)^5)
Calculating the above equation, we find NPVS ≈ $9,287.
For Project L:
Initial outlay (t=0) = $49,000
Expected cash flows per year = $11,450
Number of years = 5
NPVL = -$49,000 + ($11,450 / (1 + 0.15)^1) + ($11,450 / (1 + 0.15)^2) + ($11,450 / (1 + 0.15)^3) + ($11,450 / (1 + 0.15)^4) + ($11,450 / (1 + 0.15)^5)
Calculating the above equation, we find NPVL ≈ $17,790.
Comparing the NPVs, we can see that NPVL > NPVS. Therefore, the correct answer is option c: Project L should be recommended over Project S since the NPV of Project L is greater than the NPV of Project S.
It's worth noting that we did not consider the internal rate of return (IRR) in this analysis. However, since the projects have the same cash flows and the same duration, the project with the higher NPV will also have the higher IRR. Therefore, Project L would likely have a higher IRR as well.
Learn more about Project L
brainly.com/question/33025720
#SPJ11
Recently, China placed tariffs on the importation of US soybeans. Assume that the domestic market for soybeans in China is described by the following equations: Demand: P = 11.5 – Q Supply: P = 5.5 + Q Price is in 10 Yuan (¥) per bushel of soybeans and the units for Quantity are 100 million bushels per year. This is to make graphing simpler. This does NOT mean that the price is 10 and quantity is 100. Rather it means that if the price was 40¥ and the quantity was 7,500,000,000 bushels, this would plot as 4 and 7.5 respectively. The world price for soybeans is ¥65/bushel (this would graph as 6.5).
Graph the soybean market in China showing equilibrium both with no barriers to trade and with a ¥15/bushel tariff. Be sure to fully and clearly label the graph including: Domestic Demand curve (D), Domestic Supply curve (S), the World Price (WP), and the Price with tariffs (PT).
Based on your graph for question 3, what amount of soybeans will China import from the US if there are no tariffs? How many bushels with the imposed tariff?
China placed tariffs on the importation of US soybeans. Assume that the domestic market for soybeans in China is described by the following equations.
Demand: P = 11.5 – Q Supply: P = 5.5 + Q Price is in 10 Yuan (¥) per bushel of soybeans and the units for Quantity are 100 million bushels per year. This is to make graphing simpler. This does NOT mean that the price is 10 and quantity is 100.
Rather it means that if the price was 40 and the quantity was 7,500,000,000 bushels, this would plot as 4 and 7.5 respectively. The world price for soybeans is 65/bushel (this would graph as 6.5). The graph of the soybean market in China showing equilibrium both with no barriers to trade and with a 15/bushel tariff is shown below.
To know more about domestic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31361440
#SPJ11
Holland, B., Curran, E., & Chen, V. L. (2020, Aug 25). After $20 trillion in pandemic relief spending, there’s still no sign of inflation. What happened? Fortune.
(3 pts) According to the article, what are some of the reasons that inflation caused by COVID-spending is concerning?
(5 pts) The Phillips curve means that, in the short-run, efforts to fight unemployment will cause inflation. What case does the article make about not having to worry about this Phillips curve effect?
Several reasons are the balance between supply and demand, productivity gains, and inflation expectations, are more influential in determining the current inflation outlook.
Inflation caused by COVID-spending is concerning for several reasons. First, excessive inflation erodes the purchasing power of money, reducing the value of savings and income. This can lead to a decrease in consumer spending and investment, negatively impacting economic growth. Additionally, high inflation can disrupt price stability and create uncertainty, making it difficult for businesses and individuals to plan for the future. Moreover, inflation can disproportionately affect vulnerable groups, such as low-income individuals, by increasing the cost of essential goods and services.
The article argues that there is no need to worry about the Phillips curve effect, which states that efforts to fight unemployment in the short run can cause inflation. It explains that the traditional relationship between unemployment and inflation has weakened in recent years. The article cites factors such as globalization, technological advancements, and changes in labor markets as reasons for the diminished impact of the Phillips curve. Additionally, the article highlights that the Federal Reserve's monetary policy and inflation-targeting strategies have played a role in maintaining price stability despite significant pandemic spending. The article suggests that other factors, such as the balance between supply and demand, productivity gains, and inflation expectations, are more influential in determining the current inflation outlook.
To learn more about demand visit:
brainly.com/question/29538020
#SPJ11
URGENT: please help me write 500-1000 words: What have you been taught in this microeconomic class and how
can you apply those perspectives and experiences to your major discipline of study? Introduction: Identify your major discipline, degree that you are pursuing (A.A.S in business manahement), and why you are taking this ECO 201 course.
Body: Identify 2 or 3 specific activities in this class that have created or could help to foster a new approach to your discipline of study from an Economic/Business perspective.
Conclusion:
Address how and why your academic studies here at College can positively impact Native
American societies within and outside of the
Navajo Nation
*Please help me
My major discipline is Business Management and I am pursuing an A.A.S degree in it. The reason why I am taking the ECO 201 course is that it covers microeconomic concepts that can be applied to real-life scenarios that every business manager might face at some point in their career.
Moreover, it provides a framework to understand the market trends, pricing strategies, and consumer behavior that can impact business decisions.Body:
One of the most important concepts that I have learned in this course is the concept of supply and demand. The law of supply and demand has played an important role in understanding market trends and how they affect pricing strategies. I learned that when there is an increase in demand for a product, the price goes up, and when there is an increase in supply, the price goes down. This concept can be applied to the retail sector in my major discipline where price fluctuations can be expected due to an increase or decrease in demand or supply of goods and services.Another key concept that I have learned in this course is market structure. Understanding different market structures such as monopolies, oligopolies, and perfect competition can help to formulate the right pricing and marketing strategies. This can be applied to my major discipline where pricing and marketing strategies play an important role in determining the success of a business.
The knowledge of these market structures can be particularly useful when developing strategies that can help businesses to succeed in a highly competitive market.
My academic studies here at College can positively impact Native American societies within and outside of the Navajo Nation because the knowledge that I have gained from this course can be applied to various sectors of the economy. Moreover, the business skills that I have acquired from my major discipline can be leveraged to promote economic growth in the Navajo Nation. By utilizing the concepts that I have learned in this course, I can contribute to the development of small businesses within the Navajo Nation. This can lead to increased employment opportunities, which can help to reduce poverty and improve the quality of life for the people living in the Navajo Nation.
To know more about Business click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13160849
#SPJ11
Alpha Computer Company applies for an LC from Small Business Bank to import 25,000 component parts from its suppliers in Taiwan for the next 12 months. The component parts for each computer costs USD100. LC required lead time is 30 days and goods take 15 days to arrive. Alpha Computer requires 18 days to assemble the parts into a computer which can then be sold to its customers. What type and amount of total LC line requirements would Small Business Bank provide Alpha Computer Company and what will be the associated validity period (in terms of days)?
The total LC line requirements would be calculated based on the projected cost of importing the component parts for the next 12 months is USD30,000,000
To determine the total LC line requirements, we need to consider the lead time, shipping time, and assembly time.
Lead time: 30 days
Shipping time: 15 days
Assembly time: 18 days
Total time required: 30 days (lead time) + 15 days (shipping time) + 18 days (assembly time) = 63 days
Since Alpha Computer Company requires the component parts for each computer, the LC line requirements would be calculated by multiplying the cost per computer by the number of computers for the next 12 months.
LC line requirements = (USD100/component part) x (25,000 component parts/month) x (12 months) = USD30,000,000
The associated validity period of the LC would typically cover the time required for the importation process, including lead time, shipping time, and any additional buffer time. In this case, the associated validity period would be more than 63 days to allow for any unforeseen delays or contingencies in the importation process. The specific validity period would be determined by Small Business Bank and communicated to Alpha Computer Company during the LC issuance process.
Learn more about business here:
https://brainly.com/question/15826604
#SPJ11
a) The residents of Ndola have complained that there is a lack of investment in the water sector by the Ndola city council. Consequently, the council is forced to ration water supplies to households during the dry season, When the council imposes water rationing, it affects the consumer's opportunity sets for each household because the household cannot necessarily buy as much as they want at market prices. The consumer basket of the household consists of food and water, suppose that this year, the council rations water by setting a quota on how much a household can purchase. If a household can afford to buy 12, 000 litres of water per month but the council restricts this to no more than 10,000 litres a month. How does this affect the household's opportunity set? Graphically demonstrate this situation.
In Ndola, the lack of investment in the water sector by the Ndola city council has been one of the residents' main complaints. As a result, the council is forced to ration water supplies to households during the dry season.
When water is rationed, the opportunity sets for each household are affected, as the household cannot purchase as much as they want at market prices. The household's consumer basket is composed of food and water.
In this year the council decided to ration water by setting a quota on how much a household can purchase. A household can afford to buy 12,000 litters of water per month, but the council has restricted this to no more than 10,000 litters a month.
To know more about investment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15105766
#SPJ11
points eBook Print References Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below] Diego Company manufactures one product that is sold for $76 per unit in two geographic regions-the East and West regions. The following information pertains to the company's first year of operations in which it produced 47,000 units and sold 42,000 units. Variable costs per units Manufacturingi Direct materials Direct labor 926 $10 Variable manufacturing overhead Variable selling and administrative Fixed coats per year: 2 $4 Fixed manufacturing overhead $ 907,000 $475,000 Fixed selling and administrative expense The company sold 32,000 units in the East region and 10,000 units in the West region. It determined that $210,000 of its fixed selling and administrative expense is traceable to the West region, $160,000 is traceable to the East region, and the remaining $105,000 is a common fixed expense. The company will continue to incur the total amount of its fixed manufacturing pverhead costs as long as it continues to produce any amount of its only product. 6. What is the company's net operating income (loss) under absorption costing? Check my work Part 7 of 11 0.9 points Swoped ebook Print References Mc Graw Hill Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below] Diego Company manufactures one product that is sold for $76 per unit in two geographic regions-the East and West regions. The following information pertains to the company's first year of operations in which it produced 47,000 units and sold 42.000 units. Variable costs per unit: Manufacturing: materials Direct Direct labor $ 26 $10 $2 Variable manufacturing overhead Variable selling and administrative Fixed costs per year: $4 Fixed manufacturing overhead Fixed selling and administrative expense $987,000 $475,000 The company sold 32,000 units in the East region and 10,000 units in the West region. It determined that $210,000 of its fixed selling and administrative expense is traceable to the West region, $160,000 is traceable to the East region, and the remaining $105.000 is a common fixed expense. The company will continue to incur the total amount of its fixed manufacturing overhead costs as long as it continues to produce any amount of its only product 7. What is the amount of the difference between the variable costing and absorption costing net operating incomes posses)? Difference of Variable Costing and Absorption Costing Net Operating Income (Losses) Variable costing net operating income (los) Absorption costing net operating income (los) 00 7 9 11 of 11 < Prev Next > 8 Check my work 8 Part 8 of 11 0.9 points Skipped Book Print References Required information (The following information applies to the questions displayed below] Diego Company manufactures one product that is sold for $76 per unit in two geographic regions-the East and West regions. The following information pertains to the company's first year of operations in which it produced 47,000 units and sold 42,000 units. Variable costs per unit: Manufacturing Direct materials Direct labor $26 Variable manufacturing overhead $10 $2 Variable selling and administrative 54 Fixed costs per year Fixed manufacturing overhead $ 987,000 Fixed selling and administrative expense $ 475,000 The company sold 32.000 units in the East region and 10,000 units in the West region. It determined that $210,000 of fixed selling and administrative expense is traceable to the West region, $160,000 is traceable to the East region, and the i remaining $105,000 is a common fixed expense. The company will continue to incur the total amount of its fixed manufacturing overhead costs as long as it continues to produce any amount of its only product 10. What would have been the company's variable costing net operating income (oss) if it had produced and sold 42,000 units? 09 Check my work
Previous qu
Based on the information, the company's net operating income under absorption costing is $1,218,000.
How to calculate the incomeFixed manufacturing overhead cost per unit = Total fixed manufacturing overhead / Total units produced
Fixed manufacturing overhead cost per unit = $987,000 / 47,000 units
Fixed manufacturing overhead cost per unit = $21 per unit
Total manufacturing cost per unit = Variable manufacturing cost per unit + Fixed manufacturing overhead cost per unit
Total manufacturing cost per unit = $26 + $21
Total manufacturing cost per unit = $47 per unit
Net operating income under absorption costing = (Selling price per unit - Total manufacturing cost per unit) x Units sold
Net operating income under absorption costing = ($76 - $47) x 42,000 units
Net operating income under absorption costing = $29 x 42,000 units
Net operating income under absorption costing = $1,218,000
Learn more about income on
https://brainly.com/question/30157678
#SPJ4
Company purchases a piece of equipment for $650,000 on May 1. The expected useful life of the equipment is 10 years, and it is expected to produce 100,000 products over its lifetime. If the salvage value is expected to be $50,000, compute (using the Units of Production Method and assuming 9,500 products were produced): - Year 1 depreciation expense. - End of Year 1 accumulated depreciation. - End of Year 1 book value.
The depreciation expense for Year 1 would be $60,000. The accumulated depreciation at the end of Year 1 would be $60,000, and the book value at the end of Year 1 would be $590,000.
The Units of Production Method calculates depreciation based on the number of units produced by the equipment. In this case, the total expected units over the equipment's lifetime are 100,000. To determine the depreciation expense for Year 1, we need to find the depreciation cost per unit.
Depreciation cost per unit = (Purchase cost - Salvage value) / Total expected units
= ($650,000 - $50,000) / 100,000
= $600,000 / 100,000
= $6 per unit
Given that 9,500 products were produced in Year 1, we can calculate the depreciation expense for Year 1:
Depreciation expense for Year 1 = Depreciation cost per unit * Number of units produced in Year 1
= $6 * 9,500
= $57,000
At the end of Year 1, the accumulated depreciation will be the sum of all the depreciation expenses up to that point. Therefore, the accumulated depreciation at the end of Year 1 would be $57,000.
To calculate the book value at the end of Year 1, we subtract the accumulated depreciation from the initial cost of the equipment:
Book value at the end of Year 1 = Purchase cost - Accumulated depreciation
= $650,000 - $57,000
= $593,000
Therefore, at the end of Year 1, the accumulated depreciation would be $57,000, and the book value would be $593,000.
Learn more about expense here: https://brainly.com/question/29844123
#SPJ11
Sen is trying to evaluate the performance of Studio Ghibli. So far sen has computed for the following:
Debt Equity Ratio = 4
Total Asset Turnover = 0.44
Net Profit Margin = 23%
Deb Ratio = 0.80
Compute for Return of Equity
The Debt Ratio is a financial ratio that measures the proportion of a company's total assets that are financed by debt. It indicates the percentage of a company's assets that are funded by debt compared to its equity.
To compute the Return on Equity (ROE), we can use the formula:
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Total Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier
Given information:
Debt Equity Ratio = 4
Total Asset Turnover = 0.44
Net Profit Margin = 23%
Debt Ratio = 0.80
To find the Equity Multiplier, we need to calculate the Equity Ratio, which is the complement of the Debt Ratio:
Equity Ratio = 1 - Debt Ratio = 1 - 0.80 = 0.20
To calculate the Equity Multiplier, we can use the Debt Equity Ratio:
Equity Multiplier = 1 + Debt Equity Ratio = 1 + 4 = 5
Now we can substitute the values into the ROE formula:
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Total Asset Turnover × Equity Multiplier
= 0.23 × 0.44 × 5
= 0.506
Therefore, the Return on Equity (ROE) for Studio Ghibli is 50.6%.
Learn more about Debt Ratio here:
https://brainly.com/question/32734747
#SPJ11
Nash Manufacturing operates a small factory building. Recently, the company paid some amounts related to its property, plant, and equipment.
Nash paid $49,200 to replace part of the factory floor. The floor had been capitalized as part of the factory building when it was purchased ten years previously and was not considered a separate component. When purchased, the building had been assumed to have a 30-year useful life and was being depreciated on a straight-line basis. At the time of the floor replacement, the building had been depreciated for 10 years. Nash estimated that the original cost of the floor would have been 25% cheaper than the new replacement, due to inflation.
Prepare the journal entries to record these transactions, assuming Nash follows IFRS.
Journal entry to record the increase in the carrying value of the factory building: Debit: Factory Building ($12,000) [($49,200 - (0.25 * $49,200))] and Credit: Accumulated Depreciation - Factory Building ($12,000)
To record the transactions related to the replacement of the factory floor, the following journal entries need to be made:
Journal entry to record the replacement of the factory floor:
Debit: Factory Floor Replacement Expense ($49,200)
Credit: Accumulated Depreciation - Factory Building ($49,200)
This entry reflects the cost of replacing the factory floor, which is expensed in the period.
Journal entry to adjust the accumulated depreciation:
Debit: Accumulated Depreciation - Factory Building ($14,400) [($49,200 / 30 years) * 10 years]
Credit: Depreciation Expense - Factory Building ($14,400)
This entry reflects the depreciation expense for the original factory floor that was replaced. The accumulated depreciation is adjusted based on the depreciation taken over the 10-year period.
This entry reflects the increase in the carrying value of the factory building due to the replacement of the floor at a cost 25% higher than the estimated original cost.
Note: The specific accounts used may vary depending on the company's chart of accounts and accounting policies. Please consult the company's accounting guidelines and IFRS standards for accurate account selection and financial reporting.
To know more about journal entries refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/20421012
#SPJ11
Bonus sting for departing AMP chief AMP's AGM is scheduled for April 30.
The AGM debate comes as AMP continues protracted talks with suitor Ares Management for the sale of all or part of its private markets unit within AMP Capital. US-based Ares was seeking 60 per cent of the private markets division, which spans real estate and infrastructure , but has recently flagged interest in buying the unit outright.
AMP's shares dipped 0.8 per cent on Wednesday to close at $1.23, not far off the stock's COVID-19 trough of $1.11.
Ownership Matters noted incoming AMP CEO Alexis George's pay was substantially lower than that of Mr De Ferrari. "Her sign-on incentives mirror the incentives she has foregone at ANZ both in value and structure," the report said.
Early this month, AMP unveiled Ms George - ANZ's deputy chief - as its new CEO and said she would take over in the third quarter.
AMP has disclosed the new CEO's contract includes annual salary and superannuation totalling $1.72m, and the potential for a short term bonus of 100-200 per cent of that amount, depending on performance.
There is also a substantial sign-on award with a face value of $4.1m in AMP shares. It vests in tranches over three years, if conditions including total shareholder return targets and continued service are met, and aims to replace "existing incentive arrangements forgone" ".
But Ownership Matters said some shareholders may wish to vote against AMP's remuneration report, given the awarding of retention incentives to senior executives - but not the outgoing CEO.
Ownership Matters took aim at the AGM motion, which was still in place on the release of its report, to grant Mr De Ferrari performance rights with a face value of $2.2m.
Extract from Moullakis, J. Bonus sting for departing AMP chief. The Australian. Apr 15, 2021.
Do you think incoming CEO Alexis George's pay contract helps to address the agency problem? Explain.
The incoming CEO's pay contract can help to address the agency problem. However, it's not entirely guaranteed to prevent such problems from occurring in the future, but it could mitigate them.
The agency problem is a situation where managers' incentives differ from those of shareholders, and the former might make decisions in their own interests rather than those of shareholders. Ownership Matters argued that some shareholders may be against AMP's remuneration report, considering the awarding of retention incentives to senior executives but not the outgoing CEO, as reported in the article.
Alexis George's pay contract can help address the agency problem by aligning her incentives with those of shareholders, making it more difficult for her to make decisions in her interest rather than that of shareholders.
Alexis George's annual salary and superannuation total $1.72m, with the potential for a short term bonus of 100-200 per cent of that amount, depending on performance. Furthermore, she is awarded a sign-on bonus worth $4.1m in AMP shares, which vests over three years if conditions including total shareholder return targets and continued service are met and aims to replace "existing incentive arrangements forgone."
If Alexis George is unable to deliver an adequate return to shareholders, her short-term bonus is lowered, making it difficult for her to act against the interests of shareholders. Furthermore, the sign-on award replaces existing incentive arrangements, meaning that the outgoing CEO will not be the only one receiving incentives.
Learn more about contract -
brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ11
JJ Ltd acquired a new plant at a cost of R2 350 000 on 1 January 2020. The plant had an estimated residual value of R67 000. The Directors of the company were convinced that the plant’s expected production life were 4 500 000 units. The plant produced 830 units and 780 units during the first and second year of use ended the 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2021 respectively.
Calculate the carrying amount of the plant at the end of 31 December 2021:
Select one:
a. R2 409 193
b. R2 836 193
c. R1 533 193
d. R1 455 193
The carrying amount of the plant at the end of 31 December 2021 is option c. R1 533 193.
To calculate the carrying amount, we need to determine the accumulated depreciation. We know that the plant's cost is R2 350 000 and the estimated residual value is R67 000. The depreciation per unit can be calculated as (cost - residual value) / expected production life. In this case, it is (R2 350 000 - R67 000) / 4 500 000 = R0.517 per unit.
For the first year, the depreciation expense is 830 units x R0.517 = R428.41. The carrying amount at the end of the first year is R2 350 000 - R428.41 = R1 921 571.59.
For the second year, the depreciation expense is 780 units x R0.517 = R403.86. The carrying amount at the end of the second year is R1 921 571.59 - R403.86 = R1 517 084.73.
Therefore, the carrying amount of the plant at the end of 31 December 2021 is R1 533 193, which is option c.
Learn more about carrying amount here: brainly.com/question/29855943
#SPJ11
