Which of the following best summarizes the structure of the poem?
A. Stanza 1 introduces the reader to the subject; stanza 2 describes the train; and
stanza 3 is the departure from the train.
B. Stanza 1 is the beginning of the train’s journey; stanzas 2 and 3 are the actual
travel; and stanza 4 is the end of the train’s run.
C. Stanza 1 foreshadows the movement of the train; stanza 2 delves into greater
detail of the motion of the train; and stanza 3 shows the train as it slows and
stands still.
D. Stanza 1 depicts the excitement felt waiting for something new; stanza 2
represents the experience of the newness; and stanza 3 depicts the speaker’s
disillusionment.

Answer:

30,000+2,000+400+50+6

Explanation:

Answer:

Answer number 4. Extra information: Monologues serve a specific purpose in storytelling—to give the audience more details about a character or about the plot. Used carefully, they are a great way to share the internal thoughts or backstory of a character or to give more specific details about the plot.

The purpose of a monologue is to reveal their thoughts and emotions to the audience and characters through a moving speech that builds to a climax

This refers to the communication between one person where no feedback is given,

With this in mind, we can see that the main purpose of a monologue is to reveal their thoughts and emotions to the audience and characters through a moving speech that builds to a climax

Read more about a monologue here:

https://brainly.com/question/2516435

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Answer: What makes the speech memorable is the fact that it brought even greater attention to the Civil Rights Movement, which had been going on for many years. It also brought Martin Luther King and his message of non-violence to a nationwide (and worldwide) audience. This speech is so memorable and idealistic because it was a beautiful example of democracy and free speech at work, and it advocated for the rights of the oppressed without using violence.

Hmmmm, well I guess it is like a book because you don't know what it will be like until your start reading it.

Hope this helped. I tried my best. o(*￣︶￣*)o

Answer:

Answer:

D. ...Man,if there were one time I would actually want to cheat on a test, this might be it...​

Explanation:

The only sentence that relays any form of irony is answer D. B and C are just statements that the narrator made to carry on the story. A is a piece of internal dialogue, but it is not irony and it does not bring anything humorous to the story. Therefore, the only option left is D.

Answer:

Superordinate

Explanation:

The semantic field consists of one SUPERORDINATE and hyponyms.

The Superordinate is another name for hypernym or hyperonym. It serves as a superset of hyponyms. The semantic field of superordinate or hypernym is more comprehensive compared to hyponym. In other words, a hyponym is a subset of superordinate.

Typically, superordinates consist of hyponyms. For example, superordinate is Mammal, while hyponyms are human beings, cats, dogs, monkeys, cows.

Answer:

Answer:

Tragedy

Explanation:

hope this helps!

Answer:

There was no girl ( I think)

Explanation:

" The man’s hair was matted and disheveled. His clothes were ripped and dirty. Parts of his skin were covered in deep purple and black marks. Even from the door, Dennis could detect the man’s stench. He smelled like the fermented slop that they fed to pigs on the ranch. It was obvious that the plague had gotten this man.""

it was a man not a girl?

Answer:

Either/or fallacy or argument.

Explanation:

The either/or fallacy is a logical argument where only two options are presented despite the presence of more than two options. This happens when a speaker/ writer asserts the presence of only two choices, which makes it impossible for the other person to choose wisely.

In the given sentence "if you oppose this bill, then you do not care about public safety" is an example of the either/or fallacy. This is because the listener is presented with just two choices- either support the bill or be deemed as an opposition to it. It presents an "either" or "or" situation, leaving the person stuck between the two options.

Answer:

Being selfless means you are kind enough to put other's needs before yourself. So Tris is considerate, and probably helps other people before helping himself (sorry if its another gender I don't know what Tris's gender is.)

Explanation:

I hope that helped.

If you got it mixed up with being hopeful just remember a hopeful person doesn't have to be kind, and an assertive person often has a fiery personality.

Answer:

Communication of voice, data and other signals across a distance.

Explanation:

Answer:

Where are the choices?

Explanation:

Add the choices, and I will answer.

Answer:

Yes, the person described by Cullen in his poem will be similar to the kind of reader Hurston writes about.

Explanation:

In the essay by Zora Neale Hurston, she argues that many White publishers failed to write about the Black minorities, thus masking useful insight and knowledge of these people from the world.

In Cullen's poem, he writes about a certain White woman who believes that there would be class distinction even in heaven. While the whites sleep and snore, the slaves wake up to do the chores. This woman has a lopsided view of minorities. Similarly, the readers who would not even believe in the existence of minorities hold a lopsided view of them.

Answer:

Hurston and Cullen both address the issue of racial discrimination in their literary works. They describe the conceited and condescending attitude of white Americans toward minority races, especially African Americans. These writers felt that white Americans not only considered themselves superior to African Americans but also thought that African Americans were incapable of having intellectual and creative skills.In her essay "What White Publishers Won’t Print" Hurston describes how Anglo-Saxons think that they know everything about African Americans and show no interest in learning anything about their "internal lives and emotions." She emphasizes how white Americans have formed certain common stereotypes regarding nonwhite Americans, which is why they fail to comprehend and appreciate the true skills of African Americans and other racial minorities:I have been amazed by the Anglo-Saxon's lack of curiosity about the internal lives and emotions of the Negroes, and for that matter, any non-Anglo-Saxon peoples within our borders, above the class of unskilled labor.Similarly, in his poem "For a Lady I Know," Cullen emphasizes the arrogant and self-important attitude that white Americans have toward African Americans. He uses imagery of cherubs in heaven to describe how a lady belonging to the upper class thinks that her "poor black" servants would wait on her even after death. Cullen shows that people from the upper class (white Americans) believe that Africans Americans can never have a bright future.From her superior attitude toward African Americans, it is clear that the lady that Cullen describes in his poem could belong to the group of readers who would not be interested in reading stories about educated minorities.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

When I was studying Skeletal Anatom for Veterinarians yesterday, I came across a video. THe video told me that the breed of the animal can help you tons when dealing with skeletal anatomy, then, when I went to vet school the next day, IT HELPED ME A LOT! At first, I had to do diffrent type of research for the animal, but then, looking at the breed of the animal after, it helped me because it saved me a lot of studying <3

Answer:

offices, terminals, and loading docks aka 1,3,6

Explanation:

Answer:

Plural

Explanation:

The pronoun is the sentence is some

"some" refers to more than one thing, instead of just one single thing

Answer:

In Plato’s theory, the cave represents people who believe that knowledge comes from what we see and hear in the world – empirical evidence. The cave shows that believers of empirical knowledge are trapped in a ‘cave’ of misunderstanding.

Plato's Cave, is an allegory presented by the Greek philosopher Plato in his work Republic to compare "the effect of education and the lack of it on our nature". It is written as a dialogue between Plato's brother Glaucon and his mentor Socrates, narrated by the latter.

Answer:

it's simple. add Not to the ffw sentences

Explanation:

just add "not" to the appropriate places.

Answer:

A.Jet stream brings warm and wet weather for the year .

hope it is helpful to you ☺️☺️

Answer:

Now scientists move genes from one living thing to another. That process is called genetic engineering. Wambugu spent three years at the lab. ... Genetically modified foods, she argues, could help farmers in poor countries grow desperately needed crops. mark me as branlist please

Explanation:

Answer:

Envision wearing school regalia regular. A similar clothing regulation consistently., a similar shading jeans and shirts each week. Garbs particularly those that have shading and style necessities for all aspects of the outfit are difficult for some guardians to bear. Understudies ought to have the option to have a decision to wear whatever they want.Students ought not need to wear uniforms;they ought to have the option to communicate their style, school regalia ought to be prohibited, youngsters' opportunity of articulation is limited by school garbs.

Understudies ought to have the option to communicate their style. "Guardians, kids and even ALCU have noticed that developing kids need to figure out how to communicate." We can't have the option to communicate by wearing essential uniform.(Rauscher)"Some may expect that school regalia reduce a family apparel cost.'' (Rauscher)Most garbs is costly particularly the thoughtful I like to wear, the modest ones are irritated. "Eroding uniform takes your opportunity of articulation." ("Do School Garbs Abuse an Understudy's Entitlement to Opportunity of Articulation?") Regalia are excessively plain and common.

School regalia ought to be prohibited. "Practically 20% of state funded schools in America presently expect understudies to wear outfits to class." (Rauscher) Most schools don't expect understudies to wear uniform yet now the region has changed the arrangement. "I see the world turned out to be so uniform. Everyone must be something very similar, I like individuals who are extraordinary." ("Eric Cantona Statements at BrainyQuote.com") I can't communicate my style by wearing uniform since it's too basic."School regalia request exacting submission in a climate with required congruity." (Rauscher) My school strategy is severe too we can't wear scarfs.

Understudies opportunity of articulation is limited by school regalia. '' Understudies who need to wear a similar attire as each and every understudy in their school can't communicate their uniqueness and innovativeness." ("Does Forcing School Regalia Keep Understudies from Imaginatively Communicating?") .We ought to dispose of school outfits with the goal that everything kids can communicate uninhibitedly. "Most understudies who are needed to wear outfits reliably express solid aversion for them" (KatherineF) . I'm one of those understudies that express solid aversion for them since I like to communicate my style. "Permitting understudies to wear what causes them to feel great will keep them from feeling humiliated and empower them to put trust in their exceptional individual character (KatherineF)." A ton of understudies get harassed in light of what they wear.

A few understudies may differ with me since they figure we ought to need to wear uniform. Different understudies may accept that understudies ought to need to wear uniform. I accept we shouldn't on the grounds that we ought to have the option to communicate the manner in which we are. "We should wear outfits since it's simple for us to select garments." in understudies voice. I think we have more options with our ordinary garments. "We should wear regalia since they go with everything." Great in the event that we don't need to wear garbs you can in any case wear outfits if u need to. As should be obvious, is that I accept regalia ought to be restricted.

All in all, the vast majority accept that we should wear uniform. Understudies ought to have the option to unreservedly communicate. As an understudy it is difficult to communicate with all the upheld rules.I figure outfits ought to be prohibited from the whole usa. Understudies ought not be prescribed or needed to wear regalia, we have opportunity, we shouldn't have school rules. On the off chance that we let outfits proceed, understudies won't have the option to make the most of their leisure time however much they need to. Removing that and supplanting it with a compulsory uniform will incapacitate them from having the option to decide for themselves later on.



Hope that helps, give brainliest plz

Explanation:

Answer:

A. To detail the human rights that all people should have protected access to.

Explanation:

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was the document published by the United Nations highlighting and listing the basic human rights for all human beings. Signed 10 December 1948 in Paris, this document presents the fundamental human rights used universally and by all people, irrespective of country or race.

Some major highlights of the Rights are equality, right against discrimination, against slavery or any injustice in any form, equality before the law, right to life, etc. The overall purpose of the UDHR is to detail the human rights that can be accessed and used as protection by everyone.

Thus, the correct answer is option A.

Answer:

Personification

Explanation:

The meaning of Personification is the attribution of a personal nature or human characteristics to something nonhuman, or the representation of an abstract quality in human form.

Waves cannot have feelings XD

Glad I could help!

-Vibilities

Answer:

C -- Karl Jansky influenced Grote Reber’s work.

Explanation:

Answer:

c

Explanation:

got it right on edge 2022

Even without the specific excerpt to which this question refers, it is still possible to answer it based on the knowledge we have about Douglass and his work.

Answer and Explanation:

A writer, abolitionist, and social reformer, Frederick Douglass was born in 1818 and was a slave. Unlike many others, Douglass was able to find kindness. He was first taught by his master's wife, who was eventually forced by her husband to stop. Later, Douglass was able to find white boys who were willing to teach him how to read and write.

Once he began to learn, Douglass had access to the knowledge only white people had had access to so far. He was freed from the bondage of ignorance. However, that did not make him suffer less. He suffered for all the others who hadn't had the same luck as him. He knew the same bondage that once held him was holding other slaves: lack of education. Douglass thought it was essential for slaves to learn so that they too could be freed - from both ignorance and slavery.

Answer:

In My Bondage and My Freedom, Frederick Douglass describes how his mistress began to teach him the alphabet but was forced to stop by her husband, who convinced her that "education and slavery are incompatible with each other.”

Douglass also realized this fact as a child and resolved to learn to read and write by any means possible:

In teaching me the alphabet, in the days of her simplicity and kindness, my mistress had given me the "inch," and now, no ordinary precaution could prevent me from taking the "ell.”

In this way, Frederick Douglass suggests that education is the only way to break the chains of slavery. An educated man is free from ignorance and cannot be enslaved, so slaves should strive to get educated by any means possible.

Explanation:

Answer:

reverent will be my guest and on urbane and that matter

There is no poem.

Have a Great Day!!!