Which of the following statements are true? Select all that apply.
If the equation were graphed, it would be a horizontal line.
Both functions have the same slope.
The origin is the y-intercept for the function expressed in the table.
The linear equation does not have a y-intercept.
The table and the graph express an equivalent function.

Answer:

3/4 is the slope

Step-by-step explanation:

We want to put this in slope intercept form

y = mx+b  where m is the slope and b is the y intercept

0 = -12 + 4y - 3x

Subtract 4y from each side

-4y = -3x-12

Divide each side by -4

-4y/-4 = -3x/-4 -12/-4

y = 3/4 x +3

Answer:

Slope=3/4

Step-by-step explanation:

0=-12+4y-3x (Add 12 on the other side)

12=4y-3x (Add 3x on the other side)

3x+12=4y (Divide by 4)

y=3/4+3

Answer:

The correct answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(-8, -2)

Step-by-step explanation:

y-x = 6

y + x = -10

Add the two equations together to eliminate x

y-x = 6

y + x = -10

--------------------

2y = -4

Divide by 2

2y/2 = -4/2

y = -2

Now find x

y+x = -10

-2+x = -10

x = -8

Work Shown:

T = average Celsius temperature two Sundays ago

8% = 8/100 = 0.08

8% of T = 0.08T

L = average Celsius temperature last sunday

L = 8% higher than T

L = T + (8% of T)

L = T + 0.08T

L = 1.00T + 0.08T

L = (1.00 + 0.08)T

L = 1.08T

The 1.08 refers to the idea that L is 108% of T

Answer:

b and d

Step-by-step explanation:

khan

Answer:

72/n^5r

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Below

Step-by-step explanation:

13)

● 2d^3 × c^6 × 8d^5 × c^2

Isolate the similar terms

● (2×8)× (d^3 × d^5)×(c^6×c^2)

● 16 × d^(3+5) × c^(6+2)

● 16 × d^8 × c^8

● 16 × (dc)^8

● 16(dc)^8

■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■

● 8n×r^(-4) ×9×n^(-6)×r^3

Isolate the similar terms

● (8×9)× (r^(-4)×r^3) × (n×n^(-6))

● 72 × r^(-4+3) × n^(1-6)

● 72 × r^-1 × n^(-5)

● 72 ×(1/r) × (1/n^5)

● 72/(r×n^5)

Answer:

See below.

Step-by-step explanation:

He does not have enough to loose 2,000,000 at that point, so this whole problem is nonsense.

Answer:

The unknown integer that solves the equation is 6.

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find the missing number, we can set up an equation as if we are solving for x.

x + (-8) = -2

Add 8 on both sides of the equation.

x = 6

So, the unknown integer is 6.

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

6 plus -8 is -2

Answer:

a

   [tex]P(X < 2500) = 0.02668[/tex]

b

   [tex]P(X < 1500) = 0.00001[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

     The  population mean  is  [tex]\mu = 3350[/tex]

      The standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma = 440[/tex]

We also told in the question that the birth weight is  approximately Normally distributed

    i.e      [tex]X \ \~ \ N(\mu , \sigma )[/tex]

Given that Low-birth-weight babies weighing less than 2500 grams,then the proportion of babies born full term are low-birth-weight babies is mathematically represented as

       [tex]P(X < 2500) = P(\frac{ X - \mu }{\sigma } < \frac{2500 - \mu}{\sigma } )[/tex]

Generally  

         [tex]\frac{X - \mu}{ \sigma } = Z (The \ standardized \ value \ of \ X )[/tex]

So

      [tex]P(X < 2500) = P(Z < \frac{2500 - \mu}{\sigma } )[/tex]

substituting values

      [tex]P(X < 2500) = P(Z < \frac{2500 - 3350}{440 } )[/tex]

       [tex]P(X < 2500) = P(Z <-1.932 )[/tex]

Now from the standardized normal distribution table(These value can also be obtained from Calculator dot com) the value of

     [tex]P(Z <-1.932 ) = 0.02668[/tex]

=>    [tex]P(X < 2500) = 0.02668[/tex]

Given that  very-low-birth-weight babies (weighing less than 1500 grams,then the  proportion of babies born full term are very-low-birth-weight babies is mathematically represented as

    [tex]P(X < 1500) = P(\frac{ X - \mu }{\sigma } < \frac{1500 - \mu}{\sigma } )[/tex]

    [tex]P(X < 1500) = P(Z < \frac{1500 - \mu}{\sigma } )[/tex]

substituting values

           [tex]P(X < 1500) = P(Z < \frac{1500 - 3350}{440 } )[/tex]

       [tex]P(X < 1500) = P(Z <-4.205 )[/tex]

Now from the standardized normal distribution table(These value can also be obtained from calculator dot com) the value of

     [tex]P(Z <-1.932 ) = 0.00001[/tex]

    [tex]P(X < 1500) = 0.00001[/tex]

Answer:

Deposit value(P) = $17,760 (Approx)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Future value (F) = $30,000

Number of Year (n) = 15 year = 15 × 12 = 180 month

rate of interest (r) = 3.5% = 0.035 / 12 = 0.0029167

Find:

Deposit value(P)

Computation:

[tex]A = P(1+r)^n\\\\ 30000 = P(1+0.0029167)^{180} \\\\ 30000 = P(1.68917) \\\\ P = 17760.2018[/tex]

Deposit value(P) = $17,760 (Approx)

Answer:

x=9.6

Step-by-step explanation:

The dot in the middle represents the center of the circle, so therefore, the line that is represented by 16 is the radius. Since that is the radius, the side that is the hypotenuse of the small triangle is also 16, since they have the same distance.

The line represented by 25.6 with x as its bisector shows that when we divide it by 2, the other side of the triangle besides the hypotenuse is 12.8.

Now that we have the two sides of the triangle, we can find the last side (represented by x). Use pythagorean theorem:

[tex]a^2 +b^2=c^2\\x^2+(12.8)^2=16^2\\x^2+163.84=256\\x^2=92.16\\x=9.6[/tex]

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

● first one:

The diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular to each others wich means that they form four right angles.

STP is one of them so this statement is true.

● second one:

If ST and PT were equal this would be a square not a rhombus.

● third one:

If SPQ was a right angle, this woukd be a square.

● fourth one:

Again if the diagonals SQ and PR were equal, this would be a square.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Initial population in 2018 = 25,000

Annual growth rate (in %) = 4%

Yearly Increment in population = 4% of 25000

= 4/100 * 25000

= 250*4

= 1000

This means that the population increases by 1000 on yearly basis.

To determine what the  population will be in 2033, we need to first know the amount of years we have between 2018 and 2033.

Amount of years we have between 2018 and 2033 = 2033-2018

= 15 years

After 15 years, the population will have increased by 15*1000 i.e 15,000 more than the initial population.

Hence the population in 2033 will be Initial population + Increment after 15years = 25,000+15000 = 40,000 population.

The area is given by the integral

[tex]\displaystyle A=2\pi\int_Cx(t)\,\mathrm ds[/tex]

where C is the curve and [tex]dS[/tex] is the line element,

[tex]\mathrm ds=\sqrt{\left(\dfrac{\mathrm dx}{\mathrm dt}\right)^2+\left(\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dt}\right)^2}\,\mathrm dt[/tex]

We have

[tex]x(t)=t+\sqrt 2\implies\dfrac{\mathrm dx}{\mathrm dt}=1[/tex]

[tex]y(t)=\dfrac{t^2}2+\sqrt 2\,t+1\implies\dfrac{\mathrm dy}{\mathrm dt}=t+\sqrt 2[/tex]

[tex]\implies\mathrm ds=\sqrt{1^2+(t+\sqrt2)^2}\,\mathrm dt=\sqrt{t^2+2\sqrt2\,t+3}\,\mathrm dt[/tex]

So the area is

[tex]\displaystyle A=2\pi\int_{-\sqrt2}^{\sqrt2}(t+\sqrt 2)\sqrt{t^2+2\sqrt 2\,t+3}\,\mathrm dt[/tex]

Substitute [tex]u=t^2+2\sqrt2\,t+3[/tex] and [tex]\mathrm du=(2t+2\sqrt 2)\,\mathrm dt[/tex]:

[tex]\displaystyle A=\pi\int_1^9\sqrt u\,\mathrm du=\frac{2\pi}3u^{3/2}\bigg|_1^9=\frac{52\pi}3[/tex]

Answer:

Simplify:

[tex]-4^2-5(1^3)[/tex]

So you get:

[tex]-21\\[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{-21}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

-x²-5y³

Given that x = 4, y = 1

[tex]-(4)^2-5(1)^3[/tex]

[tex]-16-5(1)\\-16-5\\-21[/tex]

Answer:

a) 40 dollars

b) 480 dollars

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the average property tax on a three bedroom home in a certain community modelled by the equation T(x) =20x²+40x+600, the rate at which the property tax is increasing with respect to time in 2008 can be derived by solving for the function T'(x) at x=0

T'(x) = 2(20)x¹ + 40x° + 0

T'(x) = 40x+40

At x = 0,

T'(0) = 40(0)+40

T'(0) = 40

Hence the property tax was increasing at a rate of 40dollars with respect to the initial year (2008).

b) There are 4 years between 2008 and 2012. To know how much that the tax change between the years 2008 and 2012, we will find T(4) - T(0)

Given T(x) =20x²+40x+600

T(4) =20(4)²+40(4)+600

T(4) = 320+160+600

T(4) = 1080 dollars

Also T(0) =20(0)²+40(0)+600

T(0) = 0+0+600

T(0)= 600 dollars

T(4) - T(0) = 1080 - 600

T(4) - T(0) = 480 dollars

Hence, the tax has changed by $480 between 2008 and 2012

Answer:

[tex]p = 2[/tex] if given vectors must be linearly independent.

Step-by-step explanation:

A linear combination is linearly dependent if and only if there is at least one coefficient equal to zero. If [tex]\vec u = (1,1,2)[/tex], [tex]\vec v = (1,p,5)[/tex] and [tex]\vec w = (5,3,4)[/tex], the linear combination is:

[tex]\alpha_{1}\cdot (1,1,2)+\alpha_{2}\cdot (1,p,5)+\alpha_{3}\cdot (5,3,4) =(0,0,0)[/tex]

In other words, the following system of equations must be satisfied:

[tex]\alpha_{1}+\alpha_{2}+5\cdot \alpha_{3}=0[/tex] (Eq. 1)

[tex]\alpha_{1}+p\cdot \alpha_{2}+3\cdot \alpha_{3}=0[/tex] (Eq. 2)

[tex]2\cdot \alpha_{1}+5\cdot \alpha_{2}+4\cdot \alpha_{3}=0[/tex] (Eq. 3)

By Eq. 1:

[tex]\alpha_{1} = -\alpha_{2}-5\cdot \alpha_{3}[/tex]

Eq. 1 in Eqs. 2-3:

[tex]-\alpha_{2}-5\cdot \alpha_{3}+p\cdot \alpha_{2}+3\cdot \alpha_{3}=0[/tex]

[tex]-2\cdot \alpha_{2}-10\cdot \alpha_{3}+5\cdot \alpha_{2}+4\cdot \alpha_{3}=0[/tex]

[tex](p-1)\cdot \alpha_{2}-2\cdot \alpha_{3}=0[/tex] (Eq. 2b)

[tex]3\cdot \alpha_{2}-6\cdot \alpha_{3} = 0[/tex] (Eq. 3b)

By Eq. 3b:

[tex]\alpha_{3} = \frac{1}{2}\cdot \alpha_{2}[/tex]

Eq. 3b in Eq. 2b:

[tex](p-2)\cdot \alpha_{2} = 0[/tex]

If [tex]p = 2[/tex] if given vectors must be linearly independent.

a. y = 2.5x + 2000

b. The variable x represents the domain because the domain is the range of the possible x values.

c. x ≥ 0

d. The variable y represents the range because the range is the range of the possible y values.

e. y ≥ 2000

f. y = 2.5(25) + 2000

  y = 62.5 + 2000

  y = $2062.50

g. 2500 = 2.5x + 2000

   2.5x = 500

   x = 200

h. I am sorry I cannot make the graph but hopefully you can figure out how to make it using the info I have given in the above parts of the problem :)

Answer:

if he needs to walk, we can see that between the street and his house he must walk 4 times a distance of 0.5km, so this is a total of 4¨*0.5km = 2km.

Now he has a jet-pack, he can ignore the buildings and just travel in the shorter path, so we can draw a triangle rectangle, in such a way that the hypotenuse of this triangle is the distance between the home and the school.

One of the cathetus is the vertical distance, in this case, is 1km, and the other one is the horizontal distance, also 1km.

So the actual distance is given by the Pythagorean's theorem:

A^2 + B^2 = H^2

Where A and B are the cathetus, and H is the hypotenuse, then:

H^2 = 1km^2 + 1km^2

H = (√2)km = 1.41km.

Now, in the case that he has a jet-pack, he can actually go to the school using this hypotenuse line as his path, so in this case the distance and the displacement would be the same.

Distance: "how much ground an object has covered"

Displacement: "Difference between the final position and the initial position"

When he walks, the distance is 2km, but the displacement is 1.41km

When he uses the jet-pack, both the distance and the displacement are 1.41km

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

The first thing is we can see in the image, when he walks, that between the house and his school he has to walk four times a distance of 0.5 km.  The result of this is a total of 4¨*0.5 km = 2 km.  The second thing is that he must walk 2 kilometers.  On the other hand, if he has a jetpack, he can simply take the shorter path by ignoring all the buildings.  This idea is where we can draw a triangular rectangle on the map in a way so that the hypotenuse of the triangle is the distance between the school and the home.  As for the Catheti, it is a vertical distance which in this case is two blocks of 0.5 km.  The result is that these catheti have a length of 2*0.5 km = 1 km.  The other is the distance of the horizontal line, which is 1 km.  The absolute distance of this path is given by Pythagorean's theorem, which is A^2 + B^2 = H^2.  Here, A and B are the cathetus, and H is the hypotenuse, then, H^2 = 1 km^2 + 1 km^2.  As well, H = (√2)km = 1.41 km.  Currently, in the situation where he has a jetpack, he can literally fly to the school utilizing this hypotenuse line for the path he would need to follow.  For this specific situation, the displacement, and the distance would be the exact same.  The reason for this is that the definitions of displacement and distance are displacement is the difference between the final position and the initial position and distance is how much area an item has covered.  Also, when he walks, the distance is 2 km and the displacement is 1.41 km.  Also, when he utilizes the jet pack, the distance is equal to the displacement.  Both of these are 1.41 km.

Answer:

[tex]\approx \bold{6544\ in^3/sec}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Rate of change of radius of cylinder:

[tex]\dfrac{dr}{dt} = +7\ in/sec[/tex]

(This is increasing rate so positive)

Rate of change of height of cylinder:

[tex]\dfrac{dh}{dt} = -6\ in/sec[/tex]

(This is decreasing rate so negative)

To find:

Rate of change of volume when r = 20 inches and h = 16 inches.

Solution:

First of all, let us have a look at the formula for Volume:

[tex]V = \pi r^2h[/tex]

Differentiating it w.r.to 't':

[tex]\dfrac{dV}{dt} = \dfrac{d}{dt}(\pi r^2h)[/tex]

Let us have a look at the formula:

[tex]1.\ \dfrac{d}{dx} (C.f(x)) = C\dfrac{d(f(x))}{dx} \ \ \ (\text{C is a constant})\\2.\ \dfrac{d}{dx} (f(x).g(x)) = f(x)\dfrac{d}{dx} (g(x))+g(x)\dfrac{d}{dx} (f(x))[/tex]

[tex]3.\ \dfrac{dx^n}{dx} = nx^{n-1}[/tex]

Applying the two formula for the above differentiation:

[tex]\Rightarrow \dfrac{dV}{dt} = \pi\dfrac{d}{dt}( r^2h)\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{dV}{dt} = \pi h\dfrac{d }{dt}( r^2)+\pi r^2\dfrac{dh }{dt}\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{dV}{dt} = \pi h\times 2r \dfrac{dr }{dt}+\pi r^2\dfrac{dh }{dt}[/tex]

Now, putting the values:

[tex]\Rightarrow \dfrac{dV}{dt} = \pi \times 16\times 2\times 20 \times 7+\pi\times 20^2\times (-6)\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{dV}{dt} = 22 \times 16\times 2\times 20 +3.14\times 400\times (-6)\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{dV}{dt} = 14080 -7536\\\Rightarrow \dfrac{dV}{dt} \approx \bold{6544\ in^3/sec}[/tex]

So, the answer is: [tex]\approx \bold{6544\ in^3/sec}[/tex]

Answer:

108.50

Step-by-step explanation:

First find the wages

11* 6 = 66 dollars

Then figure the commission

10% of 425

.10 * 425

42.5

Add the two amounts together

42.5+66

108.50

Answer: 16 years

Step-by-step explanation:

The exponential function for continuous growth is given by :-

[tex]P=Ae^{rt}[/tex]

, where A = initial amount, r= rate of growth and t = time.

As per given , we have

A= $2,000, =r 3.5%=0.035 and P= $3500

put these vales in equation , we get

[tex]3500=2000e^{0.035t}\\\\\Rightarrow\ \dfrac{3500}{2000}=e^{0.035t}\\\\\Rightarrow\ 1.75=e^{0.035t}[/tex]

Taking log on both sides , we get

[tex]\ln 1.75=0.035t\\\\\Rightarrow\ t=\dfrac{\ln1.75}{0.035}=\dfrac{0.560}{0.035}=16[/tex]

Hence, it will take 16 years to grow to $3,500.

Answer:

y = -9x - 82

Step-by-step explanation:

Line with slope m=-9 passing through A(x1, y1) =A(-9,-1)

y-y1 = m(x-x1)

Substitute values

y-(-1) = -9(x-(-9)

y+1 = -9x -81

y = -9x - 82

Answer:

∑(-1)^k/(2k+1)! (5x)^2k+1

From k = 1 to 3.

= -196.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

∑(-1)^k/(2k+1)! (5x)^2k+1

From k = 0 to infinity

The expression that includes all terms up to order 3 is:

∑(-1)^k/(2k+1)! (5x)^2k+1

From k = 0 to 3.

= 0 + (-1/2 × 5³) + (1/6 × 10^5) + (-1/5040 × 15^5)

= -125/2 + 100000/6 - 759375/5040

= -62.5 + 16.67 - 150.67

= - 196.5

Answer:

d) F2 = -F1.

Step-by-step explanation:

According to Coulomb's law of forces on electrostatic charges, the force of attraction is proportional to the product of their charges, and inversely proportional to the square of their distance apart.

What this law means is that both particles will experience an equal amount of force on them, due to the presence of the other particle. This force is not just as a result of their individual charges, but as a result of the product of their charges. Also, the force is a vector quantity that must have a direction alongside its magnitude, and the force on the two particles will always act in opposite direction, be it repulsive or attractive.

Answer:

(0.102, -0.062)

Step-by-step explanation:

sample size in 2018 = n1 = 216

sample size in 2017 = n2 = 200

number of people who went for another degree in 2018 = x1 = 54

number of people who went for another degree in 2017 = x2 = 46

p1 = x1/n1 = 0.25

p2 = x2/n2 = 0.23

At 95% confidence level, z critical = 1.96

now we have to solve for the confidence interval =

[tex]0.25 -0.23 ± 1.96*\sqrt{((1 - 0.25) * 0.25)/216 + ((1 - 0.23) *0.23/200}[/tex]

= 0.02 ± 1.96 * 0.042

= 0.02 + 0.082 = 0.102

= 0.02 - 0.082 = -0.062

There is 95% confidence that there is a difference that lies between  - 0.062 and 0.102 on the proportion of students who continued their education in the years, 2017 and 2018.

There is no significant difference between the two.

Answer:

make a table of values

Step-by-step explanation:

then plot using those values

The required graph has been attached which represents the line y = 4/3x

A graph can be defined as a pictorial representation or a diagram that represents data or values.

We have been given the equation of a line below as:

y = 4/3x

Rewrite in slope-intercept form.

y = (4/3)x

Use the slope-intercept form to discover the slope and y-intercept.

Here the slope is 4/3 and  y-intercept = (0, 0)

Any line can be graphed using two points. Select two x values, and plug them into the equation to find the corresponding y values.

When substitute the value of x = 0, then the value of y = 0, and When substitute the value of x = 3, then the value of y = -4,

Hence, the graph represents the line y = 4/3x

Therefore, the required graph of the line y=4/3x will be shown in the as attached file.

Learn more about the graphs here:

brainly.com/question/16608196

#SPJ2

Answer:

Points : ( 8, - 2π/3 ), ( - 8, π/3 ), ( - 8, - 5π/3 )

Step-by-step explanation:

For the first two cases, ( r, θ ) r would be > 0, where r is the directed distance from the pole, and theta is the directed angle from the positive x - axis.

So when r is positive, we can tell that this point is 8 units from the pole, so r is going to be 8 in either case,

( 8, 240° ) - because r is positive, theta would have to be an angle with which it's terminal side passes through this point. As you can see that would be 2 / 3rd of 90 degrees more than a 180 degree angle,or 60 + 180 = 240 degrees.

( 8, - 120° ) - now theta will be the negative side of 360 - 240, or in other words - 120

Now let's consider the second two cases, where r is < 0. Of course the point will still be 8 units from the pole. Again for r < 0 the point will lay on the ray pointing in the opposite direction of the terminal side of theta.

( - 8, 60° ) - theta will now be 2 / 3rd of 90 degrees, or 60 degrees, for - r. Respectively the remaining degrees will be negative, 360 - 60 = 300, - 300. Thus our second point for - r will be ( - 8, - 300° )

_________________________________

So we have the points ( 8, 240° ), ( 8, - 120° ), ( - 8, 60° ), and ( - 8, - 300° ). However we only want 3 cases, so we have points ( 8, - 120° ), ( - 8, 60° ), and ( - 8, - 300° ). Let's convert the degrees into radians,

Points : ( 8, - 2π/3 ), ( - 8, π/3 ), ( - 8, - 5π/3 )

Complete question is;

A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 19 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1160 feet with a standard deviation of 32 feet. A sample of 11 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1130 feet with a standard deviation of 30 feet. Required:

Do the results support the manufacturer's claim?

Let μ1 be the true mean range of the manufacturer's cordless telephone and μ2 be the true mean range of the competitor's cordless telephone. Use a significance level of α = 0.01 for the test. Assume that the population variances are equal and that the two populations are normally distributed

Answer:

We will fail to reject the null hypothesis as there is no sufficient evidence to support the manufacturers claim.

Step-by-step explanation:

For the first sample, we have;

Mean; x'1 = 1160 ft

standard deviation; σ1 = 32 feet

Sample size; n1 = 19

For the second sample, we have;

Mean; x'2 = 1130 ft

Standard deviation; σ2 = 30 ft

Sample size; n2 = 11

The hypotheses are;

Null Hypothesis; H0; μ1 = μ2

Alternative hypothesis; Ha; μ1 > μ2

The test statistic formula for this is;

z = (x'1 - x'2)/√[(σ1)²/n1) + (σ2)²/n2)]

Plugging in the relevant values, we have;

z = (1160 - 1130)/√[(32)²/19) + (30)²/11)]

z = 2.58

From the z-table attached, we have a p-value = 0.99506

This p-value is more than the significance value of 0.01,thus,we will fail to reject the null hypothesis as there is no sufficient evidence to support the manufacturers claim.

Answer:

add 8x to both sides

Step-by-step explanation:

5-8x<2x+3

first step, subtract 3 from both sides:

2-8x<2x

second step,?

2<?x

so you need to add 8x first

Answer:

9-x^2

Step-by-step explanation:

The difference of means subtracting. the first number is 9 and the second is x^2, so you get 9-x^2

Answer:

ok as we know 15 is a whole number by itself and 3/8 is the decimal part

so we know it is 15. something

that something is 3/8 to find decimal you do 3/8

3/8 is = .375

so 15.375 is the answer

hope it helps

brainliest give me pls