c. arms race
during the cold war, america, the soviet union, and their respective allies all participated in a nuclear arms race.
It should be noted that the relationship between the Soviet Union and the United States in the era leading up to détente is a arms race relationship.
What is arms race relationship?The arms race can be regarded as a pattern of competitive acquisition of military capability between two or more countries.
This was the relationship experienced relationship between the Soviet Union and the United States in the era leading up to détente.
Learn more about arms race at:
https://brainly.com/question/3413076
How did southern states respond to Nat Turner’s rebellion?
Answer:
The first thing white people did after Nat Turner's violent slave insurrection in 1831 was round up more than 120 black people and kill them. But the next thing white people did was surprising. ... Hundreds of them sent petitions to the Virginia General Assembly calling for an end to slavery.
Answer:
thank you for answering this question
Explanation:
I'm am working on a Go.ogle Form
How does the concern for nuclear possession and use fail to address human state itself as the ultimate issue?
Answer:
the answer is though the use of nuclear weapons that all society and the human race consider a problem. anyone in society can agree that they are dangerous and inhumane form of warfare but what is not stated is why did we create them in first place. what drove a man to create a weapon of mass destruction to destroy other men? the reason we are afraid of other countries in nuclear possession is because we would rather have control over someone else or someone else's country that is why concern for nuclear possession is fails to address human state in its self be cause we are safe until the balance is tipped.
Explanation:
what is a negative effect of the foreign policy (Truman Doctrine) during the cold war?
Answer:
Explanation:
The Truman Doctrine is where the US is almost like a hero and they should defend any country against the threat of communism.
Even though the Truman Doctrine helped prevent the communist takeover of other weaker countries, it could be argued that the cold war was extended by a bit and tensions increased heavily almost to the point where every country felt in danger of both powers.
How did these advancements or practices affect the development and growth of the civilization? How did they affect the other civilization you selected?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the advancements to know what they are and answer your question. Otherwise, we do not know what are those advancements, just you know them.
You also forgot to mention what was the civilization you selected. There are many ancient civilizations.
However, trying to help you with some information, we can comment on the following.
We are going to choose the Sumerian civilization.
The advancement or the practice that affect the development and growth of the civilization was that Sumerian learned agriculture techniques that allowed them to stop being nomads and settle in a territory for the first time to grow crops and built homes to live permanently there.
In this case, Sumerians settled in between two major rivers: the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, in the Middle East region, modern-day Iraq. There, they learned how to benefit from the flooding of the rivers to grow crops in the fertile land.
Due to this success, they could establish powerful city-states such as Lagash, Nippur, Ediru, Kish, Ur, and Uruk.
They affect the other civilizations such as the Harappan or the Indus Valley civilization that settled next to the Indus River, and the ancient Egyptians that settled in next to the Nile River in North Africa.
After Santa Anna signed the treaty with Texas and Mexico withdrew its troops, what became of Texas?
Answer: The treaty added an additional 525,000 square miles to United States territory, including the land that makes up all or parts of present-day Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming. Mexico also gave up all claims to Texas and recognized the Rio Grande as America's southern boundary
Explanation:
Answer:
The Treaties of Velasco are the modern term for what was called at their drafting a "Public Agreement" and a "Secret Treaty."
The Mexican Congress considered Santa Anna's actions scandalous and nullified both. Mexican conservatives removed Santa Anna as president and installed Anastasio Bustamante, and there was an agreement with the Mexican Congress that Santa Anna had "offered nothing in the name of the nation."
What is the U.S. Constitution? A. A list of the people's responsibilities B. The law of the United States C. A list of the rights that people have in the U.S. D. The explanation of why the U.S. Uses a monarchy
Answer: It would be C; but the option choice B is close considering its the law of the land. But C would be correct.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The Constitution of the United States established America's national government and fundamental laws, and guaranteed certain basic rights for its citizens.
Although Reconstruction led to some positive changes, what major goal did it fail to achieve?
permanently guarantee the civil rights of newly freed slaves
readmit Confederate states into the Union
rebuild Southern cities and farms
Answer:
a lack of political focus on the effort failed to solve the sectional wounds, and the elimination of the freed slaves' newly gained civil liberties failed to bring about long-term racial integration
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
i just did it
what are the rights of the worker's that our Constitution upholds?
Answer:
It shall guarantee the rights of all workers to self-organization, collective bargaining and negotiations, and peaceful concerted activities, including the right to strike in accordance with law. They shall be entitled to security of tenure, humane conditions of work, and a living wage.
Explanation:
Answer:
it shall guarantee the rights of all workers to self organization, collective bargaining and negotiations, and peaceful concerted activities, including the right to strike in accordance with law. They shall be entitled to security of tenure, have conditions of work, and a living wage.
How was the secret police used to help the dictators gain control of their countries?
Answer:
regime
Explanation:
the regime .maintained itself in political power by means of the secret police, propaganda disseminated through the state controlled mass media, personality cultism, restriction of free discussion and criticism, the use of mass surveillance, political purges and persecution of specific groups of people
List three reasons why early governments developed.
Answer:
Big government—we heard a lot about it when Ronald Reagan was first seeking the Presidency. Lately the topic has attracted less attention from politicians, commentators, and scholars. But the thing itself has not disappeared. Over the past decade, as over the past century, American government has continued to grow.
Our nation was founded by men who believed in limited government, especially limited central government. They were not anarchists; nor did they espouse laissez faire. But they did believe that rulers ought to be restrained and accountable to the people they govern. If the founders could see what has happened to the relation between the citizens and the government in the United States during the past two centuries, they would be appalled.
The size and scope of government are important for many reasons. By virtue of their taxing, spending, and regulating, governments affect the allocation of economic resources, the distribution of wealth, and the rate of economic growth. Governments determine the very nature of our political economy, the character of the social organization within which we may lawfully conduct our affairs and pursue our goals. The size and scope of government determine—they are, so to speak, the opposite side of—our freedoms.
Why do both North and South Korea remain in a state of heightened military readiness?
Both countries believe the other will attack.
Both countries believe they are being spied on.
Each country is demanding the other side pay war costs or face renewed military action.
Citizens from each country cross the border to bring propaganda to undermine the government.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
Answer:
A: Both countries believe the other will attack.
Explanation:
Which one goes where? And don’t comment if your not gonna be real it’s really annoying and I will report you.
Attached is a picture with what I believe the answers are. I hope this helps! :D
In Scene 9, Frederick attends a large anti-slavery meeting. When he is asked to speak in front of the crowd, he becomes nervous and doubts himself. What kind of conflict is this? Question 1 options: Man versus nature Man versus self Man versus man Man versus society
Answer:
Man versus self
Explanation:
Although Frederick is nervous to learn that he is going to speak to a crowd, the conflict he is subjected to is not caused by the crowd, but by himself, which is an example of Man versus self conflict.
Man versus self occurs when the character has to face his own thoughts of fear, inferiority and nervousness about something. As we can see in the text shown in the question above, Frederick is doubting himself and for that reason, he is nervous. He is having a conflict with his own thoughts.
What was Eli Whitney's greatest contribution to American manufacturing?
Answer:
interchangeable parts
Explanation:
interchangeable parts helped the american manufacturing by making it easy to fix machines and it parts
1. A chain of mountainous islands *
plateau
peninsula
tundra
archipelago
Answer:
Archipelago
Explanation:
A plateau is a flat topped rock formation, a peninsula is a land mass surrounded by water on at least 3/4 of it's coastline, a tundra is a very cold and dry place, therefore by process of elimination, an archipelago must be a chain of mountainous islands.
Please help me and no file links please
Answer:
no link no answer soryyyy
1. Which of the following does not apply to the early formation of the United Nations?
Answer: History of the UN
The United Nations is an international organization founded in 1945 after the Second World War by 51 countries committed to maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relations among nations and promoting social progress, better living standards and human rights.
Due to its unique international character, and the powers vested in its founding Charter, the Organization can take action on a wide range of issues, and provide a forum for its 193 Member States to express their views, through the General Assembly, the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council and other bodies and committees.
The work of the United Nations reaches every corner of the globe. Although best known for peacekeeping, peacebuilding, conflict prevention and humanitarian assistance, there are many other ways the United Nations and its System (specialized agencies, funds and programmes) affect our lives and make the world a better place. The Organization works on a broad range of fundamental issues, from sustainable development, environment and refugees protection, disaster relief, counter terrorism, disarmament and non-proliferation, to promoting democracy, human rights, gender equality and the advancement of women, governance, economic and social development and international health, clearing landmines, expanding food production, and more, in order to achieve its goals and coordinate efforts for a safer world for this and future generations.
Explanation:
¿Por qué la batalla de Stalingrado fue tan decisiva para el curso de la guerra?
Answer:
La batalla de Stalingrado fue un punto de inflexión en la Segunda Guerra Mundial, ya que frenó la ofensiva de la Alemania nazi en territorio soviético y debilitó las fuerzas del Eje. A partir de entonces los soviéticos infligieron derrota tras derrota a los alemanes y los empujaron fuera de su territorio.
The federalist supported a strong central government the anti-federalist supported a smaller less powerful central government leading to the first two parties in America
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
The founding fathers of the constitution of the United States of America were the two parties, namely the Federalist and the Anti-federalist. They formed the two parties that shaped the American Constitution.
The Federalist was the political party that supported and believed in the strong government that is run wealthy and powerful people. They supported the constitution.
While the anti-federalist was the political party that opposed the ratification of the constitution and it supported a small and less powerful central government. They provided the Bill of Rights in the constitution.
define a peace treaty
Answer:
My definition: A peace treaty is an agreement between two or more hostile parties, usually countries or governments, which formally ends a state of war between the parties.
Explanation:
French Phase (1634-1648)
What was the reasoning behind Catholic France aiding Protestant forces in the German and Sweden states? plz help
Answer:
Peace of Westphalia and the End of the War (1648)
Can someone please help me with this.
Answer:
President Franklin D. Rosevelt provided jobs.
Explanation:
He provided jobs for those who were going through a hard time and suffering.
What was the purpose of the Stamp Act of 1765?
A. to raise revenue from the American colonies
B. to determine if the colonists were smuggling
C. to give Parliament the right to levy a tax
D. to punish those who didn’t pay their taxes
Answer: A
Explanation: It was first British parliamentary attempt to raise revenue through direct taxation of all colonial commercial and legal papers, newspapers, pamphlets, cards, almanacs, and dice.
corn chips be bussin bussinnnnn hehe
Answer:
IS IT BUSSIN JANELLE IS IT BUSSIN?!
Explanation:
(pls tell me yk what this is lol)
Answer:
lol eww;efregre2wqisdkjfkeopwoqleksf,ew
Explanation:
The leader of the British forces in the European Theater of war was ????
Douglas MacArthur
Erwin Rommel
Charles de Gaulle
Bernard Montgomery
Answer:
Charles de Gaulle
Explanation:
Why is the settlement of the Aborigines in Australia important to early human
history?
German philosophers used this word to describe their belief that each nation has its own unique spirit. German nationalists argued that the German people should tap into it and express their unique national identity. The Grimm brothers went looking for it among the German people. What was it? volksgeist nationalism Reichstag humanism
Answer:
volksgeist
Explanation:
Reichstag was a place, not a belief.
Nationalism could be true of any country. It is the belief of in one's country whether that country is right or wrong. It is perhaps the second best answer.
Humanism is characterized by the belief in individual goodness. That is not exactly what the description wants.
The answer is volksgeist which is of a higher nature than just nationalism and it is a more general term. It means the spirit of a country as defined by the spirit of the country.
answer: volksgeist
i took the test and it was right
In the period leading up to World War 1 how did nationalism unite or divide citizens
Answer:
Nationalism helped unite citizens within a certain group(such as common culture or history). However, it can also cause intense competition between nations. Many ethnic groups part of the Ottoman empire wanted to become independent and were successful going about these ways, which divided them.
Based on the Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary, what was the position of the United States toward Latin America in the 1800s? aggressive colonial belligerent defensive
Answer:
Defensive
Explanation:
The Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary policies of the United States towards Latin America in the 1800s holds the position of defensive. The United States threatens the European nation as they would not support any expansion and monarchs to control or govern as they did before in the Western Hemisphere. The support from the North led South America to choose a democratic form of government.
Answer:
D
Defensive
Explanation:
100 Points PLEASE HURRY
Was the impeachment of President Andrew Johnson fair? Should he have been removed from office?
Your post should list at least 3 reasons that support your argument.
Brainliest will go to the person who actually answers the question.
Answer:
Explanation:
On January 15, 1868, George Templeton Strong, a New York attorney, read the report from the country's capital and wrote in his journal, "Undertakings at Washington look blustery. A sad blast or something to that affect is entirely conceivable." It "makes up," he stated, "a compromising possibility."
It very well may be said that Strong was thinking little of the circumstance. The House of Representatives was going to arraign a leader of the United States, Andrew Johnson, for "egregious acts of misconduct." Everywhere, one spectator grumbled, "the air is weighty with dangers and misgivings."
Prosecution would be protected yet stunningly untidy—and remarkable. No president in U.S. history had at this point been arraigned.
It at last occurred on February 24, somewhat more than a month after Strong composed the proclamation in his journal. By an edge of 126 to 47, the House casted a ballot to denounce Johnson and the following day informed the U.S. Senate, where the president would be put being investigated as the Constitution required. The Senate would cast a ballot to either clear Johnson or convict him and eliminate him from office.
Andrew Johnson was brought into the world in Raleigh, North Carolina, to a poor mudsill father who kicked the bucket when his child was three years of age. Johnson had no proper instruction; all things considered, his mom apprenticed him to a tailor when he was ten years of age. At age 18 years, he was an ignorant town tailor in his recently received territory of Tennessee. There he met and wedded 16-year-old Eliza McCardle, the girl of a shoemaker, who instructed him to peruse and compose. Johnson turned into an unquenchable peruser who found he had an adoration for and talent for legislative issues. What's more, governmental issues seemed to cherish him. A familiar, amazing speaker, he rose quick. During the 1840s, while still just in his thirties, he turned into a U.S. Delegate from Tennessee. During the 1850s he was lead representative, and by the 1860s he was a U.S. Representative who, in contrast to each other Southern congressperson, stayed faithful to the Union during the conflict.
In 1864, Johnson was named the bad habit official running mate in Lincoln's effective re-appointment crusade. Despite the fact that he was a Union Democrat—a Southern man with Union slants—not a Republican like Lincoln, he was put on the pass to widen its allure. He had liberated his slaves and upheld Lincoln's liberation strategy. At the point when Lincoln passed on April 15, 1865, just three months into his subsequent term, Johnson became president, arriving at the top of U.S. legislative issues. Johnson was a man of genuine disposition, whom one guest saw as "limited and one sided" with "a willful, dubious temper." One of his most clear characteristics was his hardheadedness. An onlooker said he was consistently "certain he was correct, even in his blunders." This quality served him sick in his associations with Congress and carried him to reprimand.
The reprimand was the last blowup among Johnson and Congress over how to deal with Reconstruction of the Union after the Civil War—and who planned to do it. Johnson accepted he planned to do it as he would prefer. Revolutionaries in the Republican Congress considered it to be their work and their work alone.
In question was the destiny of 4,000,000 previous slaves liberated during the conflict or by the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution. Is it accurate to say that they were to be given each benefit of opportunity, as Congress wanted? Or then again left to get by admirably well, unprotected in a wrathful, brutal, bigoted South? Johnson, a racial oppressor, was very little worried about their destiny and was especially against giving individuals of color the option to cast a ballot. Likewise being referred to was the post bellum job of southern pioneers who had taken an interest in severance. Is it safe to say that they were to be seriously rebuffed, as Radicals running Congress wished or set back in the driver's seat, as Johnson needed?
At the point when Johnson became president after Lincoln's death in April 1865, the Radicals were enchanted, accepting he would be more amiable to their program and simpler to manage than Lincoln. During the conflict and before Johnson became president, an ex-Confederate had said of him that he "inhaled fire and hemp against the South, broadcasted he would make conspiracy accursed by hanging backstabbers." This satisfied the Congressional Radicals. However, in the wake of turning out to be president at war's end, Johnson changed his view as his confidence in racial oppression and his bigotry reemerged. He trusted African Americans were a substandard race unsuitable to oversee themselves as well as other people, and he anticipated that the Southern states should be readmitted into the Union and white Southerners to continue their strength over blacks.
