A jury is given the power to decide the outcome of the case by the way of majority votes in a civil case, but not in a criminal case. Therefore, the option D holds true.
What is the significance of the powers of a jury?Jury is a body of members who are involved in a court case in order to decide whether the decision of the court shall go in a favor or against the claims made by a plaintiff. A defendant is allowed to put his views in front of the jury.
The jury has the powers to entertain the matters related only to civil cases, but not in criminal cases, as the guilty mind of a criminal activity is determined a judge of the court based upon the regulations provided under the law.
Hence, the option D holds true and states about the powers of a jury to decide the outcome of the case.
Learn more about the powers of jury here:
https://brainly.com/question/10379635
#SPJ2
QUESTION 11
Which of the following is an important consideration in setting up the proper environment to complete tasks on time?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the options for this question.
However, we can help you to answer based on our knowledge of this topic.
In general terms. there is an important consideration in setting up the proper environment to complete tasks on time. This consideration is to learn to establish priorities.
Yes, this is the most important thing when setting up the proper environment to complete tasks on time.
Time management is a must for leaders, directors, managers, and coaches. These people in top positions in corporations must create a good plan, establish clear goals, followed up by strategies and tactics to accomplish those goals, and being productive.
For this to happen, they have to establish priorities, focus on the task at hand, establish a proper environment that is conducive to the activities that need to be done, and eliminate distractions to foster the correct habits that create productivity.
Answer:
Explanation: a limited distractions
b free from distractions
c a cluttered work space
d working whenever time allows
Standard of proof of evidences
QUESTION 3/10
It is illegal for employers to retaliate against an employee who is providing information in an investigation of
workplace sexual harassment
Choose the one correct answer.
True
False
SOUND
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
You can't be penalized for helping an investigation.
Discuss the difference between foriegn policy and domestic policy
Answer:
Domestic policies are those that affect or apply to people or institutions within a particular country and tend to be internal. Foreign policy has to do with policies between two or more nations and is external. It focuses on building networks with other countries.
How Can We Get Khula in Pakistan?
http://www.advocateinlahore.com/khula-procedure-in-pakistan/
Answer:
To apply for Khula the wife would need to file a suit for Khula in the Family Court under the West Pakistan Family Courts Ordinance, on the grounds that she feels she can no long live with her husband “within the limits prescribed by Allah' and such a statement on oath made in her suit would be sufficient to establish
Explanation:
what role correctional officials have to play in offenders life?
Answer:
The Correctional Official is the single most important person who mediates between an offender and society. The Official is expected to be a good role model for others in her or his presence. It is this official who holds the power over an offender's head. S/he can use this power to humiliate, and degrade the offender
Can somebody help me
A writing sample that has been made to look like someone else's handwriting is a:
Answer:
cursive
Explanation:
Which of the following documents is required for any type of search according to the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?
arrest order
arrest warrant
search warrant
seizure warrant
A police officer stopped a driver who had run a red light. Upon approaching the car, the officer noticed a strong odor of alcohol and immediately asked whether the driver had been drinking. The driver admitted having had several alcoholic drinks that evening. The driver, charged with driving while intoxicated, moved to suppress the officer's testimony regarding the driver's statement about his drinking. The driver argued that the officer had elicited the statement without providing the requisite Miranda warnings. The prosecutor has responded that the statement should be allowed in the prosecution's case-in-chief or, at a minimum, should be allowed as impeachment in the event the driver testifies and denies drinking. How should the court rule regarding the driver's statement admitting his drinking
Answer:
Police Officer Stopping a Driver Who Had Run a Red Light
The driver's statement should be allowed, as pleaded by the prosecution, because the driver was not in custody for Miranda purposes when the free admission of drinking alcohol was made.
Explanation:
The driver freely disclosed his statement about having several alcoholic drinks that evening. At the time he made the statement, the driver was not under custody, he was not under arrest, and he was not suspected of driving under intoxication. The officer stopped him because he had run a red light (another traffic offense) and only noticed the strong odor of alcohol after the traffic offense was committed. Possibly, the alcohol odor could have emanated from another source altogether.
Many New Orleans officers responding to crime in the wake of Hurricane Katrina wore easily recognizable blue uniforms with distinctive gold badges. Which nineteenth-century organization was among the first to adopt the practice of wearing formal police uniforms with its three-quarter-length royal blue coats, white trousers, and top hats?
Answer:
The first London Metropolitan Police
Explanation:
On the 29th of August, 2005, New Orleans was hit with a fatal natural disaster, which was called Hurricane Katrina and it resulted in the widespread destruction of properties through flooding and storm.
During the Hurricane Katrina, many police officers serving in New Orleans wore easily recognizable blue uniforms with distinctive gold badges while responding to criminal activities.
The first London Metropolitan Police was established by Robert Peel in 1829, under the Metropolitan Police Act of 1829.
The first London Metropolitan Police is a nineteenth-century organization and it is considered to be among the first paramilitary unit to adopt the practice of wearing formal police uniforms.
Additionally, the first London Metropolitan Police wore royal blue coats of three-quarter-length, white trousers, and top hats to match.
Mr. Farhan has sent goods to Mr. Basit, good are held by Mr. Kashif a Carrier now Mr. Farhan wants to stop the goods plz advice on which grounds he can stops the goods
Answer:
go to mr.kashif to buy good
HELP PLEASEEEE ILL MARK BRAINLIEST !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What would be the best illustration of how federal labor regulations protect American citizens
which can impact trade?
a. Government issues a nation-wide consumer recall for one car company to replace two million faulty brake systems in its cars and trucks.
b. EPA charges fines a regional electricity company for exceeding its EPA pollution guidelines for the year.
c. Anti-discrimination laws make it illegal to discriminate against women who apply for jobs working on an
oceanic oil rig.
d. Federal Trade Commission forces the phone company to refund one million dollars to consumers who paid
an illegal internet user fee.
What would be the best illustration of how federal labor regulations protect American citizens
What would be the best illustration of how federal labor regulations protect American citizenswhich can impact trade?
a. Government issues a nation-wide consumer recall for one car company to replace two million faulty brake systems in its cars and trucks.
Patty is the Plaintiff in a trial and Daryl is the Defendant. Patty and Daryl each call their witnesses, offer their evidence, and presents their side of the case. The parties rest and give their closing statements. The jury finds for Patty. Daryl disagrees with the verdict. Name one option that Daryl can do at this point of the post-trial process and what that option will do for him.
Answer:
Take it to a higher jury
Explanation:
Detective Sanders knows the hole in the windshield was caused by a bullet being shot from inside the car. How is he MOST likely to make this
conclusion?
ОА
The bullet hole is wider on the outside of the windshield.
ОВ.
The bullet hole is wider on the inside of the windshield.
Ос.
The bullet hole made radial fractures and a few concentric fractures.
OD.
There is glass everywhere surrounding the car.
Answer:
The rounded shape of the bullet because as it goes through the glass it stops spinning and this make the hole wider
Explanation:
Answer:
The bullet is wider on the outside of the windshield.
Explanation:
Appellate courts Group of answer choices are made up of judges only. will, on occasion, seat juries, but only when dealing with cases and controversies dealing with federal questions. are courts exclusively of original jurisdiction and, hence, seat juries as a matter of court to make determinations of fact in reaching verdicts. often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts. seat a jury in criminal cases but never in civil matters.
Answer:
often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts.
Explanation:
A court refers to an enclosed space such as a hall or chamber where legal practitioners (judges, lawyers or attorneys and a jury) converge to hold judicial proceedings.
There are different types of courts and these includes;
I. Trial court.
II. Circuit court.
III. Appeal court.
IV. Supreme court.
An appellate court is also known as court of appeals and can be defined as a court of law of the judicial system that is empowered by law (jurisdiction) and saddled with the responsibility of hearing and reviewing an appeal of a trial-court or other lower court (tribunal).
This ultimately implies that, all appellate courts are empowered by law to review both questions of fact and questions of law. The appellate court can review questions of law as "De novo" or plenary review (legal error standard).
A criminal case can be defined as a lawsuit brought before a court of competent jurisdiction against someone who has been accused of committing a crime.
Typically, appellate courts (court of appeals) often seat juries to listen to new evidence being presented in criminal cases on appeal to their courts.
A grand jury can be defined as a group of citizens that are legally saddled with the responsibility of reviewing the evidence in a criminal case. Thus, grand jury are legally empowered by law to carry out an investigation with respect to a potential criminal case, engage in legal proceedings and determine whether or not an evidence is quite sufficient to warrant trial in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Hence, if the grand jury serves an indictment in a criminal case, the suspect is formally accused of committing the crime. This simply means that, the grand jury has ascertained that there are enough evidence to indict an accused.
However, if in a criminal case, the grand jury offers no indictment, the case wouldn't go to trial at the time.
An act under the other acts exception must have occurred
prior to the commission of the crime for which the defendant
is being charged.
True
False
An act under the other acts exception must be occurred prior to the commission of the crime for which the defendant is being charged. Therefore, the given statement is true.
What do you mean by an act?The term act encompasses now no longer best physical acts, including turning at the water or shopping for a gun; however additionally refers to extra intangible acts including adopting a decree, edict, law, judgment, award, or determination.
Therefore, an act under the other acts exception must be occurred prior to the commission of the crime for which the defendant is being charged. Therefore, the given statement is true.
learn more about act here:
https://brainly.com/question/25791968
#SPJ2
g Which type of case would be appealed automatically to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Group of answer choices A capital felony conviction with imposed death sentence A state jail (fourth-degree) felony conviction A first-degree felony conviction A civil case involving a sum of over $100,000
Answer:
A capital felony conviction with imposed death sentence.
Explanation:
The Texas Court of the Criminal Appeals is the last and the highest court of appeal incase of any criminal matters. It is situated in the Supreme court building with the Presiding judge. The court exercises a discretionary review over the criminal cases.
The only cases the Court must hear are only those cases that involves the sentence of a capital punishment or a denial of a bail. A capital felony of conviction which imposed a death sentence to the accused can be automatically appealed to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
Can an impaired driver crash into you or someone you love? Yes or no
what type of employee is most likely to steal from their employer
1. Happy
2. Fulfilled
3. Aged
4. Dissatisfied
Answer:
4. Dissatisfied
Explanation:
If an employee doesn't feel they have enough pay or food, sometimes they will steal to satisfy themselves.
Answer:
Dissatisfied
Explanation:
Because some may not have food or money they have to satisfy to steal
Which foods are not allowed on clear liquid diet
Answer:
the things on the left are the answer
Ways to avoid emotional stress when
driving include:
a Always have the radio off
b Obey the rules-of-the-road
c Never change lanes
d Always go
with the flow
Answer:
I will go with D always go with the flow
Upon a person's fourth DUI conviction,______ is mandatory
Are foreign policy and domestic policy two faces of the same coin.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Foreign policy and domestic policy are considered as the two faces of a coin because any change in both of these policies will impact on the macroeconomic variables of both the nation.
If Kripto sues Attorney Porquine for breach of the Jones-Porquine contract to recover what he would have received under the will, could Attorney Porquine successfully defend himself due to Kripto not having standing to sue? Why or why not?
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given question:
Explanation:
No, Sandy Porquine cannot defend himself successfully. This is because Kripto is the designated beneficiary in the contract between Emma Jones and Sandy Porcupine. Beneficiaries intended to seek a court resolution (have a duty to prosecute) if their contract rights are violated. Sandy Porquine also couldn't apply this theory effectively, Kripto had obtained a right.
what is the IUPAC name for C(CH3)4
Answer:
2,2-dimethylpropane
Explanation:
Draw the structure of the compound. You will get a carbon atom in center surrounded by 4 methyl groups. Now take one linear chain. It's propane derived because of 3 carbons. Now two methyl groups are attached to second carbon atom. So you will get 2,2-dimethylpropane
Answer:
2,2 Dimethyl propane is the IUPAC name
civil cases cannot be tried by what?
A judge
A judge and jury
Third party arbitrator
An arbitrator not agreed upon
In a civil trial, a judge or jury examines the evidence to decide whether, by a "preponderance of the evidence," the defendant should be held legally responsible for the damages alleged by the plaintiff.
an agreement enforceable by law is called as
Answer:
Contract
Explanation:
an agreement enforceable by the court of law is called as contract
Kathy receives her real estate license. Within a month of receiving her license, she gets a new job offer she can’t refuse. She decides to continue to hold a license but not practice or do any real estate work or collect any referrals at this time. She is willing to renew her license, do her continuing education, and pay the same fee for her license. What should Kathy do?
Seek an involuntary inactive license.
Answer: Seek an involuntary inactive license.
Explanation:
You are indeed right that she should seek an Involuntary Inactive license which is shows that she is not practicing and therefore has not met the requirements needed for her to continue practicing real estate work.
She might be ready to renew her license but the requirements are such that she would have to do some real estate work. If and ever she is willing to come back to real estate, she can then renew her license, pay the fee and meet other requirements.
the law enacted by the military is called what
