Who is Abraham afewerki??​

Answer:

A tithe, means the tenth-part of something, usually income, paid to a religious organization. A tithe can be seen as a tax, a fee for a service or a voluntary contribution.

Explanation:

Answer:

is a one-tenth part of something, paid as a contribution to a religious organization or compulsory tax to government.

Explanation:

i hope it's helpful

Answer:

As I sit down to write here amidst the shadows of vine-leaves under the blue sky of southern Italy, it comes to me with a certain quality of astonishment that my participation in these amazing adventures of Mr. Cavor was, after all, the outcome of the purest accident. It might have been any one. I fell into these things at a time when I thought myself removed from the slightest possibility of disturbing experiences. I had gone to Lympne because I had imagined it the most uneventful place in the world. “Here, at any rate,” said I, “I shall find peace and a chance to work!”

Explanation:

I hope this helps!

Answer:

At the earliest opportunity I went to see his house It was large and carelessly furnished; there were no servants other than his three assistants, and his dietary and private life were characterised by a philosophical simplicity. He was a water-drinker, a vegetarian, and all those logical disciplinary things. But the sight of his equipment settled many doubts. It looked like business from cellar to attic—an amazing little place to find in an out-of-the-way village. The ground-floor rooms contained benches and apparatus, the bakehouse and scullery boiler had developed into respectable furnaces, dynamos occupied the cellar, and there was a gasometer in the garden. He showed it to me with all the confiding zest of a man who has been living too much alone. His seclusion was overflowing now in an excess of confidence, and I had the good luck to be the recipient.

The three assistants were creditable specimens of the class of “handy-men” from which they came. Conscientious if unintelligent, strong, civil, and willing. One, Spargus, who did the cooking and all the metal work, had been a sailor; a second, Gibbs, was a joiner; and the third was an ex-jobbing gardener, and now general assistant. They were the merest labourers. All the intelligent work was done by Cavor. Theirs was the darkest ignorance compared even with my muddled impression.

And now, as to the nature of these inquiries. Here, unhappily, comes a grave difficulty. I am no scientific expert, and if I were to attempt to set forth in the highly scientific language of Mr. Cavor the aim to which his experiments tended, I am afraid I should confuse not only the reader but myself, and almost certainly I should make some blunder that would bring upon me the mockery of every up-to-date student of mathematical physics in the countr

The object of Mr. Cavor’s search was a substance that should be “opaque “—he used some other word I have forgotten, but “opaque” conveys the idea—to “all forms of radiant energy.” “Radiant energy,” he made me understand, was anything like light or heat, or those Rontgen Rays there was so much talk about a year or so ago, or the electric waves of Marconi, or gravitation. All these things, he said, radiate out from centres, and act on bodies at a distance, whence comes the term “radiant energy.” Now almost all substances are opaque to some form or other of radiant energy. Glass, for example, is transparent to light, but much less so to heat, so that it is useful as a fire-screen; and alum is transparent to light, but blocks heat completely. A solution of iodine in carbon bisulphide, on the other hand, completely blocks light, but is quite transparent to heat. It will hide a fire from you, but permit all its warmth to reach you. Metals are not only opaque to light and heat, but also to electrical energy, which passes through both iodine solution and glass almost as though they were not interposed. And so on.

Now all known substances are “transparent” to gravitation. You can use screens of various sorts to cut off ous wealth. Of course there is one thing—”

He paused. I stood still.

Explanation:

Answer:

Well, it depends.

Explanation:

All nations have acquired territory by taking over others, slowly building up their own. So, with that logic, I suppose either all nations are bullies, or all world leaders. But, I'd have to say-neither. Both are an extreme, but in terms of a world leader, opinions vary widely across the world.

The US takes Hawaii, US a world leader or world bully as they are a dominant power and often try to control the other one.

A leader is someone who gives people a sense of purpose and inspiration. A leader provides their team with the resources and encouragement they need to succeed.

At the time, the United States was just a young nation. the American Civil War, the bloodiest conflict the USA has only ever engaged in among itself. On a smaller scale, the USA acted like a dictator in its own neighborhood.

Hawaii being a small state or a country was a significant part of tourism. This was the target audience that they have. although the United States being a big economy was often taking the part in decision-making and affecting the business of other countries.

Learn more about leaders, Here:

brainly.com/question/15176246

#SPJ2

Answer:

Thutmose III is often compared to Napoleon, but unlike Napoleon he never lost a battle. He conducted sixteen campaigns in Palestine, Syria and Nubia and his treatment of the conquered was always humane. He established a sort of “Pax Egyptica” over his empire. his treatment of the conquered was always humane

Answer:good

Explanation: he did

I’m sorry I can’t do the thing

Answer:   economics is the study of choice

i say this because it depends like on ur experiences and if its a suit for you if u dont like dirt or water this woldnt be good for u or say if you want an amazing paying job or work experience ( kinda like college u pick what u want to do and why )

OwO comment if u need more

Answer:

Answer:

The answer is A) issuing a marriage license.

Explanation:

Answer:

In 2006, I gave some lectures at Harvard during which I called for a month, a week -- a day even -- of collective mourning for the millions whose souls still cry for proper burial and mourning rites. These lectures have now been published under the title: Something Torn and New. I did not know then that others were thinking along the same lines. I am glad that this day is being commemorated at the United Nations, but it should be actively observed in the whole world, as slave trade and plantation slavery were of prime importance in the making of the modern world. But what was a gain for the world, especially in the West, was a loss for Africa. Here I am not simply talking about the loss of human lives, power, resources, the economic loss for Africa and gain for the world: Slave trade and slavery were a historical trauma whose consequences on the African psyche have never been properly explored.

It is well known that both a person who perpetrates trauma and one who experiences it can often shut the trauma in a psychic tomb, acting as if it never happened. The recipient does not mourn the loss and the perpetrator does not acknowledge the crime, for you cannot mourn a loss or acknowledge a crime you deny. This can occur at a community level, where horror committed to a group is kept in a collective psychic tomb, its reception and perpetration, passed on in silence, which of course means that there is no real closure and the wound festers inside to haunt the future.

The West has never properly acknowledged this crime against humanity, for to acknowledge is to accept responsibility for the crime and its consequences. One can, of course, see why the perpetrator of a crime may want to forget it: uneasy lies the crown on the heads of they who have committed crimes against humanity. But post-colonial Africa has also never properly mourned this trauma on its own continent as well as its diasporic communities in the Caribbean and America. In Africa and the world, slave trade and plantation slavery have never been accepted in body and mind for what they were: genocide, holocaust, displacement of unprecedented historical and geographic magnitude. It was Hitlerism long before Hitler, to borrow the phraseology from Aimé Césaire in his book, Discourse on Colonialism.

The economic consequences are obvious: the most developed countries in the West are largely those whose modernity is rooted in the Transatlantic slave trade and plantation slavery. The African body was a commodity; and manpower, a cheap resource. Note that this was continued in the colonial era where, once again, African human and natural resources were cheap for the colonialist European buyer who determined the price and worth of that which he was buying. Don't we see echoes of that today in the unequal trade practices where the West still determines the price and worth of what it gets from Africa while also determining the price and worth of what it sells to Africa?

It is not a strange coincidence that the victims of slave trade and slavery on the African continent and abroad are collectively the ones experiencing underdevelopment. For example, Haiti in the 18th century was the main economic mainstay of France, the coveted price by the major European powers of the time; today it is the most economically deprived in the Western world. Haiti's story is also that of Africa and the African people as a whole. The majority of the homeless in the world still come from communities that were the victims of the slave trade and the plantation.

But that is obvious. It's the moral consequences that deeply worry me -- the negative perception of Africa and Africans by others, and the negative self-conception of Africa and Africans by Africans. Those two conceptions have common ground in the devaluation of African lives. Massacres and genocide can happen in Africa, as in the case of Rwanda, with the world looking on. African governments can mow down their people and go to bed and sleep soundly as if nothing has happened; politicians who settle political disputes by inciting ethnic cleansing (and counter-ethnic cleansing) can go to sleep with consciences undisturbed by what they have brought about. Any life lost is, of course, horrifying, but we have seen how frantic the world and Africa become if a white European hostage is missing or meets death in Africa. It shows an indifference towards the descendants of slaves and deep concern for the descendants of slave owners.

Answer:

Last option

To indicate that the American people werre the ultmate source of its power and that governmenr exists to serve the people

Answer:

The Answer is B i just did it

Explanation:

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I'm not a really good explainer but I've learn this stuff recently

Answer:

Scholar-officials, also known as literati, scholar-gentlemen or scholar-bureaucrats were a collective name of scholars serving as government officials and prestigious scholars in the society, and it also can represent the special social class formed by these groups of intellectuals

Answer:

The judge would most likely give the lady a bail of 5,000

Answer:

Indus Valley Civilization, built along the Indus River

Explanation:

It was developed here because of the silt left behind from flooding, which allowed people to grow crops. The river would have brought many resources, such as food, like fish or other animals coming for a drink. It was also useful for irrigation.

Hope this helps!  

Answer:

The foundations of Russian history began in the present-day country of __Scandinavia___.​

Hope this helps!

Answer:geneva, scotland

Explanation:

Answer:

for current plato users, the answer choice was shuffled to D now (7/JAN/2022)

Serve as ambassadors of the US government is President Grant relied on the Quakers to play a role in Indian Territory. As ambassadors of the US government is appointed by the president of the nation.

An ambassador's primary responsibility is to manage the operations of not only his Foreign Service Police personnel, but also representatives from other US institutions in the area.

Personnel from as many as 27 national authorities collaborate with embassy officials at some overseas outposts.

Thus, option D is correct.

For more information about ambassadors of the US, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/23620212

#SPJ2

Answer:

2

Explanation:

Answer:

All of the aboveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Answer:

all of the above

Explanation:

Answer:

Papal States, Italy

Papal State, Tu, Lucca, Modena, Parma states controlled land where people spoke Italian language the most.

A structured system of communication is language. A language's grammar is its structure, while its vocabulary is its free-form elements. Humans primarily communicate using languages, which can be expressed orally, visually, or in writing.

A phonological system determines how symbols are combined to produce word sequences, or morphemes, in oral, manual, and tactile languages. A syntactic system controls how words and morphemes are combined to make phrases and utterances.

A crucial component of interpersonal connection is language. All species have their own means of communication, but only humans have perfected the use of cognitive language. We may communicate our thoughts, feelings, and ideas to others using language. It has the ability to both create and destroy societies.

Learn more about language, here

https://brainly.com/question/20921887

#SPJ2

Answer:

b. federal laws are superior to state laws

Explanation:

The Supremacy clause was intended to make the constitution the "supreme law of the land".

The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States, establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state

Answer:

C) NUMBER

Explanation:

THE PASSAGE REFLECTS VERY POORLYON THE ANCIENTGREEK SOCIETY

Answer:

n the eve of the Civil War in 1861 the Five Tribes had well-established homes and tribal governments in Indian Territory (I.T.). These five republics were forced to respond to the crisis in the United States when U.S. troops were withdrawn from I.T., leaving them vulnerable to the Confederacy. The tribes had little choice but to enter into agreements with Albert Pike, representative of the Confederate government. The Choctaw and Chickasaw were united in their support of the Confederacy, but the other three tribes either had an almost equal number of troops fighting on both sides or had more on the side of the Union, as was the case of the Cherokee. As the United States drew up the Reconstruction Treaties at the conclusion of the Civil War, it disregarded the fact that some tribe members had supported the Union. With pressure from Kansas and other midwestern states, politicians were determined to retaliate for the tribes' support of the Confederacy.

What is the reservation system?

Under the reservation system, American Indians kept their citizenship in their independent tribes, but life was harder than it had been. The reservations were designed to encourage the Indians to live within clearly defined zones. The U.S. promised to provide food, goods and money and to protect them from attack by other tribes and white settlers. Also, some educators and protestant missionaries felt that forcing the Indians to live in a confined space would make it easier to "civilize the savages."

The reservation system was a disaster for the Indians as the government failed to keep its promises. The nomadic tribes were unable to follow the buffalo, and conflict among the tribes increased, rather than decreased, as the tribes competed with each other for fewer resources.

Hence, options 1,2,3 & 6 are correct.

To learn more about The reservation policy, here

https://brainly.com/question/21351816

#SPJ2

Answer: True!

Explanation: He lived in Heian through A.D. 794 to 1868.

Answer:

Which of the following was an argument made against slavery in the Thirteen Colonies? Manufacturers argued that slavery discouraged the development of the industry. Quakers argued that slavery violated Christian principles. Puritans argued that the slave trade encouraged materialism.

Explanation:

Answer:

Pluralist democracy

Explanation:

Given that Pluralist is a form of governance in which the political decisions are made by the structural and established government and at the same time no governmental groups tend to have greater influence in the decision making.

Hence, in this case, the correct answer is PLURALISTS DEMOCRACY. This is because the passage showed that nongovernmental group (League of Conservation Voters) influence the decision making of the hypothetical country

Answer:

the answer is A bring .....