Answer:
i think it is important bc if it is truly and really bad secret and u know that person then keep it
Explanation:
1. In what ways does Du Bois criticize and in what ways does he seem to embrace the idea of inborn racial characteristics and abilities? 2. How does Du Bois appeal to both American and world history to bolster his claim to inclusion and equality for black Americans?
Answer and Explanation:
1. Du Bois embraces the idea and that innate racial characteristics and skills allow a group of individuals to prove their worth, managing to convey a meaningful message to the world. This message was able to show the unanimity and the search for similar goals that were shared in individuals with equal characteristics. For him, this was very positive, but he also found it very negative because he believed that these characteristics did not make individuals worthwhile, but promoted social progress meeting the needs of small groups at the expense of the needs of other groups.
2. For Du Bois, American and world history was established through the division of races, where privileged races were those to which blacks did not fit. This meant that blacks did not recognize themselves as members of a group and did not have enough knowledge to unite for the benefit of society, as white people have done since the beginning of time. However, with the evolution of this society, he believes that blacks should have the opportunity to participate in the creation of progress, showing the world its existence, anxieties and demands that must be heard and recognized by privileged groups, thus generating inclusion and equality within society.
Why did Hitler hate Jews's religion?
My friends . . . circumstances render it impossible that you can flourish in the midst of a civilized community. You have but one remedy within your reach. And that is to remove to the west, and the sooner you do this, the sooner will commence your career of improvement and prosperity.
Which of these leaders would most likely have spoken these words?
Tecumseh
Thomas Jefferson
Andrew Jackson
Answer:
Thomas Jefferson
Explanation:
He is saying this to a tribe
Answer:
Andrew Jackson.
Explanation:
I tried Thomas Jefferson but it was wrong. Look below for more clarity.
how do you think reconstruction might have been different if Lincoln had not been assassinated?
Answer:
Lincoln would have been fairly easy on the south. Reconstruction would have been smoother. It would still have been rough. Whites needed to be taught about the black man, many years people were the black race was inferior.
Answer:
Jane Turner Censer, professor of history at George Mason University, said:
“I always tell my students, the first step into the counterfactual can be fascinating, but the subsequent steps are likely to descend into fantasy, as contingencies and the interplay of events are lost.”
Explanation:
what are the steps in detail of becoming a president? i need seven
I have to write a timeline in a person becoming president and the steps with detail
Which of the following strategies was not a way that French traders and trappers established relations with American Indians in Oklahoma Territory in the early 1700s?
A.
They battled local tribes for territory to establish trading posts.
B.
They intermarried with American Indian women.
C.
They succeeded in learning local American Indian languages.
D.
They traveled to new territories from home bases in northern North America and the southern port of New Orleans.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
took the test in edge and got a 100%
Describe the US experience and response during the 1930’s
Answer:
They went to the great depression
Explanation: thats what i know
How did Emperor Constantine I support Christianity?
He paid to have Christian churches built.
He gifted Christians with Roman goods.
He appointed Christians to the emperor’s court.
He required Roman citizens to convert to Christianity.
WILL GIVE BRAINLEST
Answer:
He paid to have Christian churches built.Explanation:
l hope it helps
according to the document what happend in 1898
Answer:
what document
Explanation:
i am doing a project on african american heroes but i don't know who to pick so tell me who i should research about pls and thank you
Martin Robison would be the best! He was a journalist, soldier, and a fantastic writer! Martin was a wonderful guy, I think you should do him! He was a GREAT hero!
Hope This Helps! Have A GREAT Day!who were kulananda dhakal and kalyan rimal?
Answer:
they were humans
Explanation:
Answer:
Kalyan Rimal is known for the tremendous energy that he put in for the development of the music scene in ... Later, Narraj Dhakal trained him in classical music.
Explanation:
Kulananda Dhakal was the most famous priest and astrologer of Prithvi Narayan Shah who united Nepal. Allegedly following his advice, the King could win the battles after he lost so many times.
which is not true about the 1850 fugitive slave law?
A.runaway slaves had to go to canada to be free
B.It striped any runaway slaves of any legal rights
C.It allowed popular sovereignty in western states
D.people who helped runaway slaves faced steep fines
Answer: C
Explanation: the Nebraska act allowed popular sovereignty.
How are living organisms in an ecosystem linked?
Answer:
By what they eat and how they get their energy
Explanation:
National artists are recognized because of their significant contribution in the Philippine literature. Who contributed lyrical prose-poetic form?
Answer:
Francisco Arcellana (1990)
He is considered as the pioneer in developing the lyrical prose-poetic form in Filipino literature.
Explanation:
Early on the constitutional convention adopted the following proposal resolve that a nation government ought to be established consisting of a supreme legislation except executive and judiciary what debate among the delegates at the convention was solved by this resolution
Answer:
the answerb
Explanation:
two ways the Monroe Doctrine has been in effect long after President
Monroe left office
Answer:
pa brainliest answer po pa follow heart narin po follow back
Explanation:
The full document of the Monroe Doctrine, written chiefly by future-President and then-Secretary of State John Quincy Adams, is long and couched in diplomatic language, but its essence is expressed in two key passages. The first is the introductory statement, which asserts that the New World is no longer subject to colonization by the European countries:[14]
The occasion has been judged proper for asserting, as a principle in which the rights and interests of the United States are involved, that the American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers.
The second key passage, which contains a fuller statement of the Doctrine, is addressed to the "allied powers" of Europe; it clarifies that the U.S. remains neutral on existing European colonies in the Americas but is opposed to "interpositions" that would create new colonies among the newly independent Spanish American republics:[3]
We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and those powers to declare that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. With the existing colonies or dependencies of any European power, we have not interfered and shall not interfere. But with the Governments who have declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just principles, acknowledged, we could not view any interposition for the purpose of oppressing them, or controlling in any other manner their destiny, by any European power in any other light than as the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States.M
The Monroe Doctrine was a United States policy that opposed European colonialism in the Americas. It argued that any intervention in the politics of the Americas by foreign powers was a potentially hostile act against the United States.[1] It began in 1823; however, the term "Monroe Doctrine" itself was not coined until 1850.[2]
U.S. President James Monroe
Secretary of State John Quincy Adams, author of the Monroe Doctrine
The Monroe Doctrine was issued on December 2, at a time when nearly all Latin American colonies of Spain and Portugal had achieved, or were at the point of gaining, independence from the Portuguese and Spanish Empires. It stated that further efforts by various European states to take control of any independent state in the Americas would be viewed as "the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition toward the United States."[3] At the same time, the doctrine noted that the U.S. would recognize and not interfere with existing European colonies nor meddle in the internal affairs of European countries.
President James Monroe first stated the doctrine during his seventh annual State of the Union Address to the Congress. The doctrine asserted that the New World and the Old World were to remain distinctly separate spheres of influence.[4] The separation intended to avoid situations that could make the New World a battleground for the Old World powers so that the U.S. could exert its influence undisturbed.[5] By the end of the 19th century, Monroe's declaration was seen as a defining moment in the foreign policy of the United States and one of its longest-standing tenets. The intent and impact of the doctrine persisted more than a century, with only small variations, and would be invoked by many U.S. statesmen and several U.S. presidents, including Ulysses S. Grant, Theodore Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy, and Ronald Reagan.
After 1898, the Monroe Doctrine was reinterpreted in terms of multilateralism and non-intervention by Latin American lawyers and intellectuals. In 1933, under President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the U.S. went along with this new reinterpretation, especially in terms of the Organization of American States.[6]
Nuremberg Laws and Kristallnacht did it help the Nazis and Hitler gain,consolidate,and/or maintain power?
Answer:
The Nuremberg Laws and Kristallnacht had enforced Hitler's ideals of anti-semitism and maintained his power.
Explanation:
How it maintained his power was during his early political career in his book, "Mein Kampf" had shown the hatred for Jews as they were the cause of Germany's problems. Initially, he used the Jewish population as scape-goats to unite the German people against a common enemy. As he grew in power he started to enforce violence against Jews and eventually sent them to camps that were kept secret even to German citizens. They would usually display camps in propaganda films as a getaway reeducation center where all the Jews lived comfortably. Despite all of this, scapegoating did help him gain and maintain power but the prosecution of Jews further was unnecessary anymore as it just wasted manpower and materials to manage camps.
WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!
What was the imperial system in which the ruling nation dictates and controls policy in its foreign territories, colonies and spheres of influence?
A. Direct Rule
B. Concurrent Rule
C. Shared Powers
D. Protectorate
The imperial system in which the ruling nation dictates and controls the policy is called the protectorate.
Option D is correct.
What is imperialism?When the powerful country takes hold over another nation with an view to exercise dominance over the political, economic, and social scenario of the that conquered nation, then that process is defined as Imperialism. It could be done in ancient times by exercising colonial rule over the nation or using the armed forces.
Protectorate is one of form of the imperial system where the ruling state has full or partial influence over the other state. It is considered to be the dependent region where most of the internal affairs controlled by ruling state. In this system, the control lies on their outside nations and the respective colonies. It is a kind of protection given to the weaker states by the powerful states with some proportionate control.
Therefore, the imperial system mentioned in option D is correct.
Learn more about the imperialism in the related link:
https://brainly.com/question/16384818
#SPJ2
did imperialism lead to a more globalized world?
Answer:
Yes, and no.
Explanation:
Imperialism had consequences that affected the colonial nations, Europe, and the world. It also led to increased competition among nations and to conflicts that would disrupt world peace in 1914. although there were a lot of perks!
•Agriculture production is also improved.
•Healthcare access is improved through imperialism.
•Developing countries gain access to new technologies.
•it also exposed a lot of people to new cultures and ethnicities!
Answer:
The effects of imperialism were influencing the imperialist powers, Europe and the globe. They also contributed to more rivalry between nations and wars which in 1914 would upset global peace. There were a lot of advantages, though!
Explanation:
Hope this helps
what two technological improvements have benefited the economy?
Answer:
the Internet and International Trade
Explanation:
Answer:
Technological advances have significantly improved operations and lowered the cost of doing business. Currently, as an example, just a few technicians controlling robotic systems can operate an entire manufacturing plant, and innovative inventory systems are capable of supplying needed parts within a short time for assembly. Advancements in the computer industry, coupled with advancements in telecommunications, have increased job opportunities and strengthened economic growth.
All physical barriers to communication over distances have been properly overcome by the internet. In a similar way, manufacturing and consumer goods companies have developed online links to their suppliers and customer support. Suppliers can keep track of production line efficiencies through automated systems and can more efficiently ship parts and materials to the required locations, reducing inventory and downtime. In addition to that ecommerce and online banking capabilities have also helped reduce the cost of doing business.
Explanation:
I hope these two help
What did Executive Order 9981 desegregate?
A. restaurants and eateries
B. schools
C. buses and transportation
D. the military
The military Executive Order 9981 desegregate. The correct option is D. Despite the extensive research conducted during World War II and the executive order, there were still delays.
What was the impact of desegregation?Johnson discovered that desegregation resulted in a wide range of better outcomes for African Americans. Johnson discovered positive trends such as higher wages, healthier lifestyles, and a lower likelihood of incarceration after following students' data into adulthood.
The arrest, beating, and blinding of African American veteran Isaac Woodard by Batesburg, South Carolina police on February 12, 1946, just hours after he was honorably discharged from the United States Army and while still in uniform, sparked a national outcry and aided Harry Truman's push to desegregate the military.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about desegregation here:
https://brainly.com/question/18321409
#SPJ6
why do we say that it was not natural fertility and high level of food production on that was the causes of early urbanisation??
Answer:
The answer is below.
Explanation:
The reason we say that it was not natural fertility and high level of food production that was the causes of early urbanization in Mesopotamia occurred in the Southern part of the country, where agriculture was only possible through irrigation.
This made the people of Mesopotamia build their cities along the Tigris and Euphrates and the other branches of these rivers.
Also, it is through this river that aids water transportation that serves as one of the causes for early urbanization in the Southern Mesopotamia region.
Answer:
Is that your answer ☺️☺️☺️
5. What does 'taxation without
A.representation' mean?
Colonists thought only the British should pay taxes.
B.Colonists weren't going to pay their taxes until they had a representative in England, and a say in Govt.
6. The Declaration of Independente is essentially...
A. a break-up letter to the King from the Colonies
B. a break-up letter to the Loyalists
7. What nation ruled the Colonies for many years?
A. England
B. Spain
8. What was decided on in the second continental congress?
A.The Colonies were going to fight the British for their independence.
B.They needed a third meeting,
President’s Action Committee on Social Amelioration (PACSA)
Read the following statements, and then answer the questions. I GIVE BRAINLY
a.
Chinese goods such as porcelain, jade, and silk were much more valuable than the goods brought over for trade by the English.
b.
The English, Portuguese, Dutch, and Spanish all tried to tap into the riches of China between the 1500s to the 1700s.
c.
The Chinese were reluctant to do trade with the Portuguese because the Portuguese were little more than pirates.
d.
The Dutch seized the island of Taiwan in 1684 to use as a base for trade with China.
What is it about the statements you selected that indicates to you that they are biased?
Answer:
okay so I put
The Dutch seized the island of Taiwan in 1684 to use as a base for trade with China.
and got it right because it said the answers will very so if you put what I put you will get it right because there is no exact answer so you welcome ;)
What did nationalists say was the solution to Japan’s economic problems?
Answer:
Through foreign expansion; a Pacific empire on Chinese mainland yielding raw materials, increased living space. They took over Nanjing, China.
Richard Russell: - United States Senator from Georgia - Secured passage of the National School Lunch Program in 1946. Led a panel of five senators around the world to report on the condition of American soldiers during World War Il 7277: - Served 25 terms in the House of Representatives Considered the "father of the two-ocean navy" Engineered and maneuvered multiple bills through Congress to expand the navy Who fits the description? А) William Hartsfield B) Jimmy Carter U Lester Maddox D) Car Vinson
Answer:
D.) Car Vinson
Answer:
carl Vinson
Explanation:
difference between the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act.
What is the correct definition of a phalanx that is shown in this
image?
O a soldier
O a weapon of war
O a battlefield
O a military formation
Answer:
a military formation
Explanation:
was a rectangular mass military formation, usually composed entirely of heavy infantry armed with pole weapons. :)
Answer:
A military formation
Explanation:
An example of the vernacular literature of the Middle Ages is *
A. the Proslogion by Anselm of Canterbury.
B. Aristotle’s Summa Theologica.
C. Roger Bacon’s Opus Majus.
D. The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
