Answer:
Exactly the point, this is a poem or and passage about something, that couldn't be done. But there was one person, who achieved that thing, that couldn't be done. The theme of this poem or passage is Integrity. Integrity names a lot of things, but I will only name a few(not really):
honesty · uprightness · honor · good character · good principle(s) · ethics · morals · righteousness · morality · nobility · high-mindedness · right-mindedness · noble-mindedness · truthfulness · trustworthiness · wholeness · undividedness · togetherness · coalition · strength · sturdiness · solidity · solidness · durability · stability
A lot of that was shown in this poem or passage, which ever you choose.
HOPE THIS HELPS ;)
How did the end of the Vietnam War mark a difference in US foreign policy? A. The US had never lost a war before, making war a less favorable option B. The US required an attack on US soil first before beginning a war C. The US would not get involved in any foreign wars after it D. The US would begin new wars in Southeast Asia to prove its strength
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The US had never lost a war before, making war a less favorable option: the end of the Vietnam War marked a difference in US foreign policy. Thus, option A is the correct option.
The end of the Vietnam War marked a difference in US foreign policy in that the United States became more hesitant to engage in large-scale military interventions. Option A is the most accurate choice among the given options. The Vietnam War was a costly and divisive conflict for the United States, resulting in significant loss of life and resources without achieving the desired outcomes.
The war had a profound impact on public opinion and eroded the American people's trust in the government's decision-making regarding military engagements. As a result, there was a shift towards a more cautious approach to future military interventions, with a greater emphasis on diplomatic solutions and a reluctance to commit to protracted wars without clear objectives or popular support.
Learn more about Vietnam War here:
https://brainly.com/question/30134989
#SPJ2
What effects did the Magna Carta have on English government? Check all that apply.
It limited the power of the king.
It gave the king’s government more control.
It established the right to a trial by jury.
It led to the creation of a legislative branch.
It reduced the rights of citizens.
Answer:
A C D
Explanation:
The effects caused by Magna Carta on the English government are given below.
It limited the power of the king.It established the right to a trial by jury.It led to the creation of a legislative branch.What were the effects of the Magna Carta?The Magna Carta stated that people could not be punished for crimes unless they were lawfully convicted. The charter also gave the barons the right to declare war on the king if he did not follow its provisions.
What was the effect of the Magna Carta in England?The Magna Carta was a document signed by King John in 1215. This document made kings subject to the law and stated that people could not be deprived of their lives, liberty or property unless judged by others (law). This document influenced the US Constitution by having an effect on the 10 Amendments.
Learn more about the Magna Carta here https://brainly.com/question/25378155
#SPJ2
Scenario B You are a principal who is trying to figure out the truth about a lunchroom fight. The fight was between Justin and Max. Justin is a new student. He is shy and doesn’t have many friends. Max is a popular student who is known for his friendliness. Account A: Justin “Max started it. I was just standing in line waiting to pay for my food, and he shoved me super hard. And for no reason! He just freaked out on me. I don’t even know the kid, and he’s been weird to me ever since I started going to this school. Him and his friends glare at me in English class for no reason.” Account B: Max “That kid is psycho. He turned around and punched me out of nowhere. Me and my friends were standing in line just joking around, and he turned around and punched me for no reason. He’s messed up and creepy. Ask anyone.” Account C: Jamie (student who has class with Max and Justin right before lunch) “I wasn’t in the cafeteria today, and I’m not friends with any of those guys, but I’ve seen Max and his friends be mean to Justin in the hallways and in class when the teacher isn’t looking. Not physical or anything, but they’ll like say jokes under their breath and then laugh and stuff like that. They make him uncomfortable."
Answer:
Max started the fight.
Explanation:
Max started the fight by making Justin uncomfortable by saying jokes on him and laugh at him so Justin exhausted and punched Max on his due to anger and in that way the fight was started. So by analyzing the situation, Max is responsible for this fight due to his bad behavior so Max should be punished so he did not repeat such type of behavior with another student.
Answer:
the answer is c on edge 2020
Explanation:
what are two groups who discovered america by crossing the atlantic before columbus? (not the vikings)
Answer:
Polynesians and Romans
Explanation:
In 1492, Christopher Columbus discovered America that changed the world forever. It commonly understood that Vikings and Polynesians got there before him.
Ancient Polynesian were navigators who sailed as far as Hawaii, New Zealand, and Easter Island, which required them to cross an ocean in small boats.
The evidence of chicken bones in America led the first archaeological evidence for contact between Polynesians and the indigenous peoples of South America.
The evidence for ancient Roman in the Americas comes from the artifact known as the Tecaxic-Calixtlahuaca head. The head is a terracotta figure that resembles a similarity to the Roman origin.
Read the excerpt from the preamble to the Constitution. Insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare. According to the excerpt, the responsibility of government is to
This question is incomplete because the options are missing; here is the complete question:
Read the excerpt from the preamble to the Constitution:
Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare.
According to the excerpt, the responsibility of government is to
A. create and maintain a system that exists to serve state governments.
B. set up an operating a system that eliminates the need for a strong federal government.
C. preserve and enforce internal law and order.
D. maintain internal peace, and support citizens and protect them from foreign threats.
The correct answer is D. maintain internal peace, and support citizens and protect them from foreign threats.
Explanation:
The preamble of the Constitution is the first section of this document, which describes key principles of the Constitution and introduces the purpose of the Constitution. In the case of the section "Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare" this describes the purpose or function of the Constitution and government. About this statement, it can be concluded the government and Constitution serves to preserve the general peace and well-being within the country "maintain internal peace" as well as protecting citizens "provide for the common defense". According to this, option D is correct.
Maintain internal peace, support citizens and protect them from foreign threats is the responsibility of the government.
What is the responsibility of the government?The first selection of this document is the preamble to the constitution. Which traces fundamental principles of the Constitution and presents the purpose of the Constitution.The second selection of the document is“Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare” which describes the aim of the Constitution and government.About this evidence, it can be concluded that the government and Constitution fulfills to preserve the general peace and well-being inside the country means “maintain internal peace” as well as protecting citizens means “provide for the common defense”.
Hence, option D is correct.
Read more about constitution, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/17020039
Which compromise led to the South's agreement to accept Hamilton's plan? A) state debts would not be paid B) The Bank of the United States would be located in Georgia. C) The United States capital would be moved further south. D) Three-fifths of state debt would be paid.
Answer:
The answer is C. The united states capital would be moved further south
Explanation:
The statement below was made by Thomas Jefferson in an 1801 speech. The support of the State governments in all their rights…I consider one of the essential principles of our Government… How is Jefferson's view reflected in the U.S. Constitution?
Answer:
C) The U.S. Constitution says powers not given to the federal government belong to the states.
Explanation:
The Jefferson's view reflected in the U.S. Constitution is that the U.S. Constitution says powers not given to the federal government belong to the states.
What is the Constitution ?A constitution is a collection of guiding ideas or accepted precedents that serve as the foundation for a polity, organization, or other sort of body's legal system and frequently specify that institution is to be governed.
The Convention's draught of the Constitution had as one of its main goals the creation of a government with sufficient authority to operate on a national level, but without excessive power.
The U.S. Constitution specifies that powers not delegated to the federal government belong to the states. Jefferson believed that if these powers were transferred to the federal government, basic rights would be in jeopardy.
Learn more about the Constitution, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/19411179
#SPJ5
why do you think india and pakistan were so concerned about winning the accession of the various princely states?
Answer:
In order to gain more power.
Explanation:
India and Pakistan were so concerned about winning the accession of the various princely states because they want to increase their area and resources. Both of the countries wanted to include the princely states in their country due to gain more power in the region. These princely states were rich in resources and these countries earn more money from their resources so both were very concern about the winning the accession of the various princely states.
What are some of the moral issues surrounding immigration?
Answer:
Immigration the declaration of independence they restricting immigration struggled.
Explanation:
Congress make sets and law the numbers issued immigration of each year,immigration restricted by the economic reason.
Immigration are they protections of the constitution and understand law work for immigration, constitution declare the "we the people".
Functional system that rather then summarily exclude citizen family, automatically allow a person to the united states.
Immigration committed violations to obtaining deport able, to pay a fine and obtain residence a visa available.
Immigration judges were authority to examine surrounding an united states,and regardless banned , relief good people.
Immigration purposes allows price to transport non citizens outside the local agency.
Immigration system are laws behaviors that sometimes come result in deportation.
If a historian wanted to determine wether iron tools could be found in the ruins of an ancient African city, which kind of expert should he consult
Answer:
Metallurgical expert
Explanation:
Dyess’s book was published when the war was still being fought. Beck and Burgos were interviewed in the 1990s, five decades after the war. How did Dyess’s account of the Bataan Death March differ from Beck’s and Burgos’s accounts? How were the accounts similar? Describe your answer in at least three sentences.
Answer:
Dyess’ account of the Bataan Death March changed into just like Burgos’ and Beck’s money owed with inside the manner they defined the remedy of prisoners of war. The variations lie of their attitude of the Death March, and the timing in their interviews. Dyess changed into capable of offering greater elements because of the activities had been greater currently while he changed into interviewed. Their views range in that Dyess and Beck had the outsider’s factor of view, even as Burgos had the local’s factor of view.
Explanation:
Answer:
the differences in how soon after the Bataan Death March the accounts were given
the different perspectives of the three prisoners
the similarities between the prisoners’ situations
Explanation:
edg 2021
According to the timeline, what were two significant events that occurred in September, 1862? (Please provide you answer in chronological order).
Answer:
Hey there!
Two major events that happened in September of 1862 included the Union's loss at Harper's Ferry, and the Battle of Antietam.
Let me know if this helps :)
Which of the following was NOT an option Kennedy had in dealing with the Cuban Missile Crisis? A. Try diplomatically solving the issue B. Launch a full-scale invasion of Cuba C. Use nuclear weapons to destroy the missiles D. Do nothing about the missiles
Answer: B
Explanation: To me, I think it is B because, during that Crisis, Russia had planted NUCLAR milsiels at key US cities. What Kennedy did was Surround the Island with US naval ships, loaded with milssesl that would shoot down any fired from enimey land.
I NEED HELP!!!
What was the CIAs response to a potential military coup against Diem? A. They would launch a counter-attack against any forces attempting a coup B. They would not interfere in a coup C. They would initiate the coup D. They would protect Diem at all costs
Answer:
The answer is A. They would launch a counter-attack against any forces attempting a coup.
Explanation:
I am exactly sure of this answer and this answer is 100% correct for me. I ope it is correct for you too.Hope this helps....
Have a nice day!!!!
The vast majority of socialists favored:
A. Violent revolution of the government
B. Slow progress through regular political means
C. Separation from the government
D. Making changes through non-governmental methods
Answer:
B. Slow progress through regular political means
Explanation:
Socialism is an economic theory that is in direct opposition to capitalism. This principle advocates the common ownership of the means of production in the society as against the private ownership of the means of production. Advocates of socialism reason that all who participated in labor and work should be able to benefit from the proceeds therein.
The answer to the question above depends on the time frame and government being discussed. There are socialist who are aggressive in achieving their aims and they tend towards communism, while the peaceful socialists are social democrats. When socialism started it advocated slow progress of achieving their aim through political means. During the World War, most proponents of socialism were attuned to the application of ethical considerations and peaceful measures to achieve their goal of a socialist economy against a Capitalist economy. Communists whose goals were similar to theirs (and this is indeed a form of socialism) were violent in their approach. For example, Joseph Stalin used the forceful method of collectivization to ensure a communist society in the soviet union. The most part of the 20th century saw the prevalence of communist countries who were revolutionary in nature and would tolerate no opposition.
What legal and political idea is contained in this edict from Hammurabi’s Code? A. limits of power B. protection from unreasonable search C. presumption of innocence D. right to present evidence
Answer:
D. right to present evidence
Explanation:
It said she had to have evidence in order to prove her "prejudice" (the way she feels about something)
(✿◡‿◡)ƪ(˘⌣˘)ʃ
How the electoral college controversy during the Hayes-Tilden presidential election of 1876 was resolved?
Answer: The Compromise of 1877 by which the Democrats conceded the election to Hayes in return for an end to Reconstruction and the withdrawal of federal troops from the South. After a controversial post-election process, Hayes was declared the winner.
Explanation:
Often, myths are based on events that actually happened. How does a story become a myth rather than history? Historians decide that the event actually could have happened that way. As people retell the story, they add extra details to make the story more impressive. Once the story becomes part of history, people decide to add parts to it. A mythologist writes a book that includes a factual description of the event.
Answer:
As people retell the story, they add extra details to make the story more impressive.
Explanation:
"The statement “it's a myth” means that a tale or story may be based on some truth, but that it is also based on fiction. ... Within the academic setting, a myth is known as a true fact and over time has been changed through the many different views within a society as an effort to answer the questions of human existence."
*I am pretty sure this is correct....Sorry if it's not :)
TRUE OR FALSE The idea that everybody has the right to vote was influenced during the American Revolution by the Magna Carta.
Answer:
I believe the answer is true
The American Revolution was
A-War of Independence fought between France and the American colonists in an
attempt to break free from oppressive rule
B - was fought between the American colonists and Great Britain in an attempt to break
free from oppressive rule
C - is an event that does not really have any impact on our lives
D - none of the above
Answer:
B
Explanation:
The Gilded Age Overview
What are 3-5 things that were unique to life in cities?
Answer:
The Gilded Age included the negative effects of increasing industrialization and the rise of big corporations, led by ruthless, wealthy monopolists.
Explanation:
Cities became more crowded than before which often lead to congestion and an unhygienic lifestyle.The pollution of cities rose to unprecedented levels because of the rising factories and overcrowded cities.Long working hours for the workers especially for women and children.Strikes organized by the labor to organize their efforts for wage rise and unhygienic conditions.The sharp contrast between the rich industrialist and common poor masses who were like working machines.