Your help is very much appreciated and I will mark you brainliest:)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

point est. 0.307824427

99% 2.58

Confidence Interval - "P" values  

(0.2914 , 0.3243 )  

Answer:

0 is the answer measure 1

Answer:

D. Height

General Formulas and Concepts:

Geometry

Area of a Circle: A = πr²

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find the area of a circle, we must follow the formula. Out of all the options given, height is not incorporated into the formula.

It wouldn't make sense to use height anyways since it would be 3-dimenional and we're talking 2-dimensional.

∴ our answer is D.

A stationary point at x = 3 means the derivative dy/dx = 0 at that point. Differentiating, we have

dy/dx = 6x ² + 2ax + b

and so when x = 3,

0 = 54 + 6a + b

or

6a + b = -54 … … … [eq1]

The curve passes through the point (4, 2), which is to say y = 2 when x = 4. So we also have

2 = 128 + 16a + 4b - 30

or

16a + 4b = -96

4a + b = -24 … … … [eq2]

Eliminate b by subtracting [eq2] from [eq1] and solve for a, then for b :

(6a + b) - (4a + b) = -54 - (-24)

2a = -30

a = -15   ===>   b = 96

Answer:

15.534% decrease

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the new number of boys and girls on the honor roll:

56(0.75) = 42 boys

150(0.88) = 132 girls

Find the new total number of students on the honor roll:

42 + 132 = 174

Find the percent decrease by dividing the difference in the number of students by the original number.

There were originally 206 total students on the honor roll. Find the difference:

206 - 174 = 32

Divide this by the original amount:

32/206

= 0.15534

So, the number of students on the honor roll decreased by approximately 15.534%

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  B(8, 4)

Step-by-step explanation:

Reflection across the origin negates both coordinate values.

  (x, y) ⇒ (-x, -y) . . . . . reflection across the origin

  A(-8, -4) ⇒ B(8, 4)

Answer:

a) the probability that the defective board was produced during the first hour of operation is [tex]\frac{1}{10}[/tex] or 0.1000

b) the probability that the defective board was produced during the  last hour of operation is [tex]\frac{1}{10}[/tex] or 0.1000

c) the required probability is 0.2000

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data in the question;

During a specific ten-hour period, one defective circuit board was found.

Lets X represent the number of defective circuit boards coming out of the machine , following Poisson distribution on a particular 10-hours workday which one defective board was found.

Also let Y represent the event of producing one defective circuit board, Y is uniformly distributed over ( 0, 10 ) intervals.

f(y) = [tex]\left \{ {{\frac{1}{b-a} }\\\ }} \right _0[/tex];   ( a ≤ y ≤ b )[tex]_{elsewhere[/tex]

= [tex]\left \{ {{\frac{1}{10-0} }\\\ }} \right _0[/tex];   ( 0 ≤ y ≤ 10 )[tex]_{elsewhere[/tex]

f(y) = [tex]\left \{ {{\frac{1}{10} }\\\ }} \right _0[/tex];   ( 0 ≤ y ≤ 10 )[tex]_{elsewhere[/tex]

Now,

a) the probability that it was produced during the first hour of operation during that period;

P( Y < 1 )   =   [tex]\int\limits^1_0 {f(y)} \, dy[/tex]

we substitute

=    [tex]\int\limits^1_0 {\frac{1}{10} } \, dy[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{1}{10} [y]^1_0[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{1}{10} [ 1 - 0 ][/tex]

= [tex]\frac{1}{10}[/tex] or 0.1000

Therefore, the probability that the defective board was produced during the first hour of operation is [tex]\frac{1}{10}[/tex] or 0.1000

b) The probability that it was produced during the last hour of operation during that period.

P( Y > 9 ) =    [tex]\int\limits^{10}_9 {f(y)} \, dy[/tex]

we substitute

=    [tex]\int\limits^{10}_9 {\frac{1}{10} } \, dy[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{1}{10} [y]^{10}_9[/tex]

= [tex]\frac{1}{10} [ 10 - 9 ][/tex]

= [tex]\frac{1}{10}[/tex] or 0.1000

Therefore, the probability that the defective board was produced during the  last hour of operation is [tex]\frac{1}{10}[/tex] or 0.1000

c)

no defective circuit boards were produced during the first five hours of operation.

probability that the defective board was manufactured during the sixth hour will be;

P( 5 < Y < 6 | Y > 5 ) = P[ ( 5 < Y < 6 ) ∩ ( Y > 5 ) ] / P( Y > 5 )

= P( 5 < Y < 6 ) / P( Y > 5 )

we substitute

 [tex]= (\int\limits^{6}_5 {\frac{1}{10} } \, dy) / (\int\limits^{10}_5 {\frac{1}{10} } \, dy)[/tex]

[tex]= (\frac{1}{10} [y]^{6}_5) / (\frac{1}{10} [y]^{10}_5)[/tex]

= ( 6-5 ) / ( 10 - 5 )

= 0.2000

Therefore, the required probability is 0.2000

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The given information tells us there is one congruent side in the two right triangles. That is not sufficient to claim congruence of the triangles.

  CNBD

__

The figure shows one congruent angle in addition to one congruent side, so the figures can be shown to be congruent using the ASA theorem.

  ΔLAW ≅ ΔWKL

_____

Additional comment

We don't know which answer is expected. You should discuss this question with your teacher, since it appears to be missing the statement that

  ∠ALW ≅ ∠KWL

Answer:

0.05x + 0.1(55 - x) = 3.9

Step-by-step explanation:

There are 55 coins.

Let x = number of nickels.

The number of dimes is 55 - x.

The value of a nickel is $0.05, and the value of a dime is $0.10.

The value of x nickels is 0.05x

The value of 55 - x dimes is 0.1(55 - x)

The total value of the coins is 0.05x + 0.1(55 - x)

The total value of the coins is $3.90

0.05x + 0.1(55 - x) = 3.9

Answer:

Binomial probability refers to the probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials in an experiment which has two possible outcomes (commonly called a binomial experiment).

Answer:

Farah: x

Ibtisam: x-3

Muna: 2(x-3) or 2x-6

Sum of all their ages: 4x-6

Step-by-step explanation:

Farah is x, so we don't need an expression for that.

Ibtisam is 3 years younger than Farah, which means that we need to subtract 3 from Farah, and that would be Ibtisam's age. x-3.

Muna is 2 TIMES Ibtisam's age, so we need to multiply whatever expression taht was used for Ibtisam by 2. Put brackets around the equation with 2 outside: 2(x-3). Solve and you get 4x-6

Now, you have all their ages in expression form, now you need to simplify by adding:

x+x+2x-6

We cannot simplify -6, so we put that aside. Add all the x's and you get 4x, insert the minus 6 at the end:

4x-6

Hope this helps!

--Applepi101

Answer:

a) X -3

b) 4x - 9

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Farah's age is X so Ibtisam will be X - 3 old since he is 3years younger than Farah

b) Farah is X years old

Ibtisam is X - 3 years old

Muna is 2(X -3) since she is 2 times older than Ibtisam.

the sum of Thier ages will be

X + X -3 + 2(x-3)

= 2x - 3 + 2x - 6

= 4x - 9

Answer:

The selling price after the markup is $1.82

Step-by-step explanation:

$1.40 * .30 =

Multiply $1.40 times .30 (which is same as 30%)

$1.40 * .30 = $0.42

Add $1.40 and $0.42

= $1.82

Hope this helps.

Answer:

a = 3√6 in

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question given above, the following data were obtained:

Angle θ = 60°

Adjacent = 3√2 in

Opposite = a =?

The value of 'a' can be obtained by using the tan ratio as illustrated below:

Tan θ = Opposite / Adjacent

Tan 60 = a / 3√2

√3 = a / 3√2

Cross multiply

a = √3 × 3√2

Recall:

c√d × n√m = (c×n) √(d×m)

Thus,

√3 × 3√2 = (1×3)√(3×2)

√3 × 3√2 = 3√6

a = 3√6 in

Answer:

g(x) = x² + 2x + 1

General Formulas and Concepts:

Algebra I

Terms/Coefficients

Functions

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define

Identify

g(x) = f(x + 1)

f(x) = x²

Step 2: Find

Answer:

$147

Step-by-step explanation:

0.15x = $22.05

Divide both sides by 15

22.05/0.15 = $147

The null and alternate hypotheses are

H0 : u = 0.44  vs   Ha: u > 0.44

Null hypothesis: 44% of readers own a personal computer.

Alternate Hypothesis : greater than 44% of readers own a personal computer.

This is one tailed test and the critical region for this one tailed test for the significance level 0.1 is  Z >  ±1.28

The given values are

p1= 0.54 , p2= 0.44 ; q2= 1-p2= 0.56

Using z test

Z = p1-p2/√p2(1-p2)/n

Z= 0.54-0.44/ √0.44*0.56/200

z= =0.1/ 0.03509

z=  2.849

Since the calculated value of Z=  2.849 is greater than Z= 1.28  reject the null hypothesis therefore there is sufficient evidence to support the executive's claim.

Null hypothesis is rejected

There is sufficient evidence to support the executive's claim at 0.10 significance level.

https://brainly.com/question/2642983

Answer:

y = - x - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

y=mx+b

m refers to slope

b refers to y intercept

y = (-1)x + (-2)

y = - x - 2

Answer:

y=-1x-2

Step-by-step explanation:

plug in the slop and y intercept to the equation y=mx+b

Answer: 22

Step-by-step explanation:

−2−(3)(−2)(4)

=22

Answer:

-5-9i

Step-by-step explanation:

-1-8i-4-i

-1-4-8i-i

-5-9i

Answer:

354°15'38.99''

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

Pick two points on the line

(0,-5)  and (1,-1)

We can find the slope using

m = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

   = ( -1 - -5)/(1 - 0)

  (-1+5)/(1-0)

    4/1

  = 4

Answer:

1/y^3

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that a^-b = 1/a^b

y ^-3 = 1/y^3

===========================================================

Explanation:

Any equilateral triangle has all three angles of 60 degrees each. Splitting the triangle in half like this produces two identical copies of 30-60-90 triangles.

Any 30-60-90 triangle will have its hypotenuse twice as long compared to the short leg. The short leg here is 5 (it's opposite the smallest angle), so that doubles to 2*5 = 10 which is the value of x.

Note: the other side of this right triangle is 5*sqrt(3).

Answer:

x=10

Step-by-step explanation:

∵ Δ IS Equilateral.

∴ sides are equal.

perpendicular from vertex bisects it.

x=2×5=10

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

CALVIN

v=[tex]\pi[/tex]× r ² × h

v=3.14 × 3² × 12

v=3.14×9 × 12

v=3.14 × 108

v = 339.12

JAMEL

v=[tex]\pi[/tex] × r ²×h

v=3.14× 6 ² × 6

v=3.14 × 36×6

v=3.14×216

v=678.24

144 x 1.25 = 180

Answer: 144

Answer:

144

Step-by-step explanation:

144 × 1.25 = 180

We add the 1 to .25 to represent the original value plus the 25% increase.

Or you could have divided 180 by 1.25 to find original price.

$5531.49

(9×9)×$68.29

If the scale factor is 30, then all you have to do is multiply each measurement by the scale factor. In this case, 4 · 30 = 120.