60feet to meters plaese with work

Answer:

Margin of Error = z∝/2 * Standard Error

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for standard error is given by

SE = [tex]\sqrt{\frac{pq}{n} }[/tex]

Where p is the probability or proportion of success q=1-p and n is the number of trials or samples.

Now Margin of Error is given by

ME = z∝/2 * Standard Error

The confidence level is used to estimate the value of alpha.

For example 90% confidence means alpha= 1-0.9= 0.1 and alpha by 2 would be 0.05 . So the value for alpha by 2 would be 1.96

Answer:

x = -5 or x = i sqrt(3) or x = -i sqrt(3)

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for x:

x^3 + 5 x^2 + 3 x + 15 = 0

The left hand side factors into a product with two terms:

(x + 5) (x^2 + 3) = 0

Split into two equations:

x + 5 = 0 or x^2 + 3 = 0

Subtract 5 from both sides:

x = -5 or x^2 + 3 = 0

x = (0 ± sqrt(0^2 - 4×3))/2 = ( ± sqrt(-12))/2:

x = -5 or x = sqrt(-12)/2 or x = (-sqrt(-12))/2

sqrt(-12) = sqrt(-1) sqrt(12) = i sqrt(12):

x = -5 or x = (i sqrt(12))/2 or x = (-i sqrt(12))/2

sqrt(12) = sqrt(4×3) = sqrt(2^2×3) = 2sqrt(3):

x = -5 or x = (i×2 sqrt(3))/2 or x = (-i×2 sqrt(3))/2

(2 i sqrt(3))/2 = i sqrt(3):

x = -5 or x = i sqrt(3) or x = (-2 i sqrt(3))/2

(2 (-i sqrt(3)))/2 = -i sqrt(3):

Answer: x = -5 or x = i sqrt(3) or x = -i sqrt(3)

Answer:

C. x = −5, 1.7i, −1.7i

Step-by-step explanation:

Quick answer:

C. x = −5, 1.7i, −1.7i

explanation:

C. is the only answer option that does NOT have 0 as a root, which is impossible, because there is a constant term, which means that all roots are non-zero. In other words, we cannot extract x as a factor.

Complete answer:

All odd degree polynomials have at least one real root.

By the real roots theorem, we know that

if there is a real root, it must be of the form [tex]\pm[/tex]p/q where q is any of the factors of the leading coefficient (1 in this case) and p is any factor of the constant term d (15 in this case).

Values of [tex]\pm[/tex]p/q are

On trial and error, using the factor theorem, we see that

f(-5) = 0, therefore -5 is a real root.  By long division, we have a quotient of x^2+3 = 0, which gives readily the remaining (complex) roots of +/- sqrt(5) i

The answer is {-5, +/- sqrt(5) i}, or again,

C. x = −5, 1.7i, −1.7i

Answer:

$325.28

Step-by-step explanation:

152+152=304

304x1.07=325.28

Answer:

325.28

Step-by-step explanation:

increase the price by 100 %

152* 100%

152

Add this to the original price

152+152 = 304

Now find the sales tax

304 * 7%

304 * .07

21.28

Add this to the amount of the purchase price

304+21.28

325.28

Answer:

60/220

Step-by-step explanation:

we use combination,

[tex] (\frac{5}{1} ) \times ( \frac{4}{1} ) \times ( \frac{3}{1} )[/tex]

[tex]5 \times 4 \times 3 = 60[/tex]

then, all divided by,

[tex] (\frac{12}{3}) = 220 [/tex]

[tex]60 \div 220[/tex]

The probability of the first piece being milk chocolate, the second being white chocolate, and the third being milk chocolate is 0.06.

The probability helps us to know the chances of an event occurring.

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{Desired\ Outcomes}{Total\ Number\ of\ outcomes\ possible}[/tex]

The sample contains five milk chocolates, three dark chocolates, and four white chocolates. Therefore, the probability that the first piece is milk chocolate is

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{\text{Number of Milk choclates}}{\text{Total number of choclates}}[/tex]

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{5}{12}[/tex]

Now, since the chocolate is been eaten the sample size will reduce from 12 chocolates in total to 11 chocolates in total (four milk chocolates, three dark chocolates, and four white chocolates). Therefore, the probability of the second piece being white chocolate is

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{\text{Number of White choclates}}{\text{Total number of choclates}}[/tex]

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{4}{11}[/tex]

Now, as the chocolate is been eaten the sample size will reduce from 11 chocolates in total to 10 chocolates in total (four milk chocolates, three dark chocolates, and three white chocolates). Therefore, the probability of the third piece being milk chocolate is

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{\text{Number of Milk choclates}}{\text{Total number of choclates}}[/tex]

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{4}{10}[/tex]

Thus, the probability of the first piece being milk chocolate, the second being white chocolate, and the third being milk chocolate is

[tex]\rm Probability=\dfrac{5}{12}\times \dfrac{4}{11} \times \dfrac{4}{10} = \dfrac{80}{1320} = 0.06[/tex]

Hence, the probability of the first piece being milk chocolate, the second being white chocolate, and the third being milk chocolate is 0.06.

Learn more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/795909

Answer:

Solution : ( - 5, 5π / 4 )

Step-by-step explanation:

There are four cases to consider here, the first two with respect to r > 0, the second two with respect to r < 0. r is the directed distance from the pole, and theta is the directed angle from the positive x - axis. Let's start by listing coordinates when r is positive. r here is 5 units from the positive x - axis.

( 5, θ ) theta here is between 30 and 60 degrees, so we can say it's about 45 degrees.

( 5, θ ) theta here is the remaining negative side of 360 - 45 = 315. That would make it - 315.

And when r is negative ( r < 0 ),

( - 5, θ ) now the point is going to lie on the ray pointing in the opposite direction of the terminal side of theta. This will be 45 degrees more than 180, or 180 + 45 = 225 degrees.

Right away we know that ( - 5, 225° ) is our solution, we don't have to consider the second case. Converting 225 to radians in terms of π will be 5π / 4 radians, giving us a solution of ( - 5, 5π / 4 ) or option b.

Answer:

1 square foot is the answer

Answer:

1 ft^2

Step-by-step explanation:

We know 12 inches = 1 ft

12 inches by 12 inches

1 ft by 1 ft

The area is 1 * 1 = 1 ft^2

Answer:

Put 0 in the box.

Step-by-step explanation:

The value x = 0 if replaced in the given equation will always make the denominator zero.

Best Regards!

Answer:

Here's what I get  

Step-by-step explanation:

h = 0.5d + 4

A function rule tells you how to convert an input value (x) into an output value (y).

Your function rule is

ƒ(x) = 0.5x + 4

An easy way to represent your function is to make a graph.

The easiest way to make a graph is to make a table containing some inputs and their corresponding outputs.  

Here's a typical table.

[tex]\begin{array}{cc}\textbf{x} &\textbf{y} \\0 & 4 \\2 & 5 \\4 & 6 \\6 & 7\\6 & 8 \\\end{array}[/tex]

The graph is like the one below.

Answer:

symmetric

Step-by-step explanation:

it kind of evenly falls to the left and right from the highest value in the middle

skewed would be different and would look like a straight line not a quadratic equation

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{Q = \sqrt{A+2a}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]A = Q^2 -2a[/tex]

Adding 2a to both sides

[tex]Q^2 = A+2a[/tex]

Taking sqrt on both sides

[tex]Q = \sqrt{A+2a}[/tex]

Answer:

a)0.519

b)requirements for constructing a confidence interval about p are satisfied.

c)0.488, and 0.550

d)yes this is because there is no possibility

that the true proportion is not captured in the confidence interval.

e)

0.450, 0.512

Step-by-step explanation:

a)The point estimate for the population proportion of adult Americans who believe that televisions are a luxury they could do without can be calculated as

521 of that adult that indicated that televisions are a luxury they could do without/1003 adults surveyed,

p = 521/1003

= 0.519.

b)

np(1-p)=1003×(0.519)×(1-0.519)

=250.39≥10 and the sample size is less than 5% of the population

therefore, requirements for constructing a confidence interval about p are satisfied.

c) we were given 95% confidence,

Then α=(1-0.95)

= 0.05

From the Z-tables,we can get the critical value is Z , which is (0.05/2) = Z (0.025) = 1.96

confidence interval can the be calculated using the formula below

- p ± Z*√ p (1 – p)/n

=0.519 ± 1.96√0.519×(1 – 0.519)/(1003)

= 0.519 ± 1.96×0.0158

0.519 ± 0.031

= 0.488, and 0.550

d) yes this is because there is no possibility

that the true proportion is not captured in the confidence interval.

e)the sample size can be calculated as

P=x/n

=(1003-521)/1003

=0.481

But we're given 95% confidence interval

Then

α=(1-0.95)=

0.05

From the Z-tables,we can get the critical value is Z , which is (0.05/2) = Z (0.025) = 1.96

Then convidence interval=

- p ± Z*√ p (1 – p)/n

=0.481 ± 1.96√0.481×(1 – 0.481)/(1003)

0.450, 0.512

Answer:

  -11/13

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of the line through these points can be written using the 2-point form of the equation of a line:

  y = (y2 -y1)/(x2 -x1)(x -x1) +y1

  y = (4 -(-3))/(-9-4)/(x -4) -3

  y = (-7/13)x +28/13 -3

For x=0, the value of y is ...

  y = 28/13 -39/13 = -11/13

The output for an input of 0 is -11/13.

Answer:

a. t = 2.48 will be a period within 2009.

b. 56.16 million

Step-by-step explanation:

Here is the complete question

Apple introduced the first iPod in October 2001. Sales of the portable music player grew slowly in the early years but began to grow rapidly after 2005. But the iPod era is coming to a close. Smartphones with music and video

Apple introduced the first iPod in October 2001. Sales of the portable music player grew slowly in the

END OF THE IPOD ERA

players are replacing the iPod, along with the category of device it helped to create. Sales of the iPod worldwide from 2007

through 2011 (in millions) were

approximately

N(0= -2.65t2 + 13.13t+ 39.9 (0 < t< 4)

in year t, where t= 0 corresponds to 2007. Show that the worldwide sales of the iPod peaked sometime in 2009. What was the approximate largest number of iPods sold worldwide from 2007 through 2011?

a. Show that the worldwide sales of the iPod peaked sometime in 2009

N(t) = -2.65t² + 13.13t + 39.9

To find the maximum value of N(t), we find dN(t)/dt and equate it to zero

dN(t)/dt = d[-2.65t² + 13.13t + 39.9]/dt

dN(t)/dt = -5.3t + 13.13 = 0

-5.3t = - 13.13

t = -13.13/(-5.3)

t = 2.477

t ≅ 2.48

d²N(t)/dt² =d[-5.3t + 13.13]/dt = -5.3 < 0. So, t = 2.48 is a maximum point

Since t = 2 is 2009 and t = 3 is 2010, t = 2.48 will be a period within 2009.

b. What was the approximate largest number of iPods sold worldwide from 2007 through 2011?

The approximate largest number of ipods sold is when t = 2.48

N(2.48) = -2.65(2.48)² + 13.13(2.48) + 39.9

N(2.48) = -16.29856 + 32.5624 + 39.9

N(2.48) = 56.16384

N(2.48) ≅ 56.16 million

Aswer:I am sure of the answer it is 6 and 42

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  your answer is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

For the purpose here, we'll call the missing point on the arc through Z point X.

Essentially, you want to make ΔXYZ ≅ ΔLMN by SSS. The construction so far ensures LM ≅ MN ≅ XY ≅ YZ. By copying the length LN to XZ, you ensure the congruence of the remaining sides of the triangles.

Then ∠XYZ ≅ ∠LMN because corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent.

In short, XZ needs to be the same distance as LN.

Answer:

≈ 3.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Calculate the distance d using the distance formula

d = [tex]\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+(y_{2}-y_{1})^2 }[/tex]

with (x₁, y₁ ) = (P(5, 1) and (x₂, y₂ ) = Q(3, 4)

d = [tex]\sqrt{(3-5)^2+(4-1)^2}[/tex]

   = [tex]\sqrt{(-2)^2+3^2}[/tex]

   = [tex]\sqrt{4+9}[/tex]

    = [tex]\sqrt{13}[/tex] ≈ 3.6 ( to the nearest tenth )

Answer:

3.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Look above bru

∡NMO = 59°

if MO bisect =>

=> ∡LMN = 2∡LMO =>

=> 5x - 22 = 2(x + 31)

5x - 22 = 2x + 62

5x - 2x = 62 + 22

3x = 84

x = 28°

∡LMO = ∡NMO => ∡NMO = x + 31

=> ∡NMO = 28 + 31 = 59°

Answer:

Calculated χ² = 13.425

χ² (5,0.025) >14.45 and χ²(5,0.975) <1.24

The given data does not fall in the critical region so we accept H0 and conclude there is no evidence to doubt the color distribution claimed by the website.

Step-by-step explanation:

Color             Blue      Orange     Green    Red   Yellow    Brown

Frequency     30         48              55        66         70         131

Expected      40           40              40        80          80        120

H0:  The bag of plain M&Ms is made up of 10% blue, 10% orange, 10% green, 20% red, 20% yellow, and 30% brown

Ha: The color distribution is not equal to  the distribution stated in the null hypothesis.

Calculate chi square

χ² = (30-40)² /40 + (48-40)²/40 + (55-40)²/40 + (66-80)²/80 + (70-80)²/80 + (131-120)²/120

χ² = 2.5 + 1.6 + 5.625 + 2.45 + 1.25= 13.425

The critical region for χ²  for 5 degrees of freedom with ∝= 0.05 is

χ² (5,0.025) >14.45 and χ²(5,0.975) <1.24

The given data does not fall in the critical region so we accept H0 and conclude there is no evidence to doubt the color distribution claimed by the website.

Answer:

Solution : Third Option

Step-by-step explanation:

The first step here is to make all the signs uniform. As you can see the third inequality has a less than sign, which we can change to a greater than sign by dividing negative one on either side, making the inequality y > - 7.

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}y>-3x+4\\ y>2x\\ y>-7\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

Now take a look at the third option. Of course the y - coordinate, 3, is greater than - 7, so it meets the third requirement ( y > - 7 ). At the same time 3 > 1( 2 ) > 2, and hence it meets the second requirement as well. 3 > - 3( 1 ) + 4 > - 3 + 4 > 1, meeting the first requirement.

Therefore, the third option is a solution to the system.

Answer:

3 only

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider the statement, "The two cities with the highest number of respondents, both show more support for candidate A." In the total column, the two highest number of respondents are 471 and 463 which represent Carsonville and Appleton. For Carsonville, the number of respondents who prefer candidate A is 205, which is less than the number of respondents who prefer candidate B, 266. Therefore, this statement is not true.

Consider the statement, "The number of people who support candidate B in Carsonville is twice the number of people who support candidate B in New Thomas." In the table, the number of people who support candidate B in Carsonville is observed to be 266 and the number of people who support candidate B in New Thomas is 138. Since 266 is not equal to twice 138, this statement is not true.

Consider the statement, "More residents of Center City responded to the poll than the number who responded from New Thomas." In the total column, it can be observed that 350 people responded to the poll in Center City and 318 people responded to the poll in New Thomas. Since, 350 is greater than 318, this statement is true.

Consider the statement, "Overall, more residents support candidate A than candidate B." The bottom row of the table represents the total number of responses for each candidate. The number of people supporting candidate A is 797, which is less than the number of people supporting candidate B, 805. So, this statement is not true.

Therefore, the true statement is III only.

More residents of the center city responded to the pole than the number who responded from New Thomas, which is the only correct option. Option B. is correct.

Data given in the table shows the data of elections between two candidates among the different cities.

Statistics is the study of mathematics that deals with relations between comprehensive data.

I.The two cities with the highest number of respondents both show more support for candidate A. This statement is false because carsonville is the second highest support for A but it does not show more support for candidate A.

II.The number of people who support candidate B in Carsonville is twice the number of people who support candidate B in New Thomas. It is false

III. More residents of Center City responded to the pole than the number who responded from New Thomas. It is true.

IV. Overall, more residents support candidate A than candidate B. it is also false.

Thus, more residents of the center city responded to the pole than the number who responded from New Thomas, which is the only correct option. Option B. is correct.

Learn more about Statistics here:
https://brainly.com/question/23091366

#SPJ5

Answer:

The equation for a unit radius circle, centered at the origin is:

x^2 + y^2 = 1

Now, if we want to move it horizontally, you can recall to the horizontal translations:

f(x) -----> f(x - a)

Moves the graph to the right by "a" units.

A vertical translation is similar.

Then, if we want a circle centered in the point (a, b) we have:

(x - a)^2  + (y - b)^2 = 1.

Now, if you want to change the radius, we can actually write the unit circle as:

x^2 + y^2 = 1^2

Where if we set x = 0, 1 = y, this is our radius

So if we have:

x^2 + y^2 = R^2

And we set the value of x = 0, then R = y.

So our radius is R.

Then:

"A circle of radius R, centered in the point (a, b) is written as:

(x - a)^2 + (y - b)^2 = R^2

Answer:

f(2) = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)=x^2-2x+2

Let x=2

f(2)=2^2-2*2+2

    = 4 -4 +2

    = 2

Answer:

That's your answer

x= 125

3x= 375

2x-1= 249

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

-33, -27, -21, -15,....

-33 +6 = -27  

-27+6 = -21

-21+6 = -15

This is an arithmetic sequence

The common difference is +6

explicit formula

an=a1+(n-1)d  where n is the term number and d is the common difference

an = -33 + ( n-1) 6

an = -33 +6n -6

an = -39+6n

recursive formula

an+1 = an +6

10th term

n =10

a10  = -39+6*10

      = -39+60

      =21

sum formula

see image

The sum will diverge since we are adding infinite numbers

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Just multiply 5/7 by 7 since his dog retrieved 5/7 out of the 7 ducks he shot.

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

7*5/7

7 represents the # of ducks

5/7 represents the # of ducks that were recovered

The question asks the number of ducks that were recovered so you should multiply the total # of ducks there are by the fraction that were recovered.

Answer:

[tex]\text{Critical Region} = z<-1.96\ \text{or}\ z>1.96[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

A test for the difference between two population means is to be performed.

As the population variances are known, the z-test will be used.

The hypothesis can be defined as follows:

H₀: μ₁ = μ₂ vs. Hₐ: μ₁ ≠ μ₂

Assume that the significance level of the test is, α = 0.05.

The critical region can be defined as follows:

The critical value of z for α = 0.05 is:

[tex]z_{\alpha/2}=z_{0.05/2}=z_{0.025} =-1.96\\\\z_{1-\alpha/2}=z_{1-0.05/2}=z_{0.975} =1.96[/tex]

Use a z-table.

[tex]\text{Critical Region} = z<-1.96\ \text{or}\ z>1.96[/tex]

Answer:

63 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

If Chubby ran his wheel, which has a diameter of 20cm, we want to find its circumference - this will tell us how far Chubby has ran one one full rotation of the wheel.

The formula for the circumference of a circle is [tex]2\pi r[/tex], where r is the radius. We know the diameter is 20, which is double the radius, so the radius is [tex]20\div2=10[/tex] cm.

We can know substitute inside the formula:

[tex]2\cdot \pi \cdot10\\\\2\cdot 3.14 \cdot10\\\\ 6.28\cdot10\\\\62.8[/tex]

62.8 rounded to the nearest cm is 63.

Hope this helped!

Answer:

6280

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

75°

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's find the size of x°

BCFE has four sides so the sum of its angles sizes is 360°.

● CBE + 110 + 110 + CFE = 360

CFE is equal to 65° since they have the same vertex

● CBE + 220 + 65 = 360

● CBE + 285 = 360

● CBE = 360-285

● CBE = 75

CBE and x° have the same size since they share the same vertex.so:

● x° = 75°

Answer:

75°

Step-by-step explanation:

CBE = x (vertically opposite angles are equal)

CFR = 65° (vertically opposite angles are equal)

C+F+E+B= 360 (angles in a quadrilateral sum up to 360°)

110+65+110+x=360

x= 75°

Answer:

Approximately 3.05

Step-by-step explanation:

Using "compatible numbers" we can simply round these numbers to integer values.  Let's make 76.32 => 76 and 24.98 => 25

So from here let's do 76/25 to get 3 R 1/25

1/25 as a decimal is .04

So far, we have 3.04.  Going back to Look at our decimals, .32 and .98, there is a larger difference in our down rounding with the .32 than the up rounding from our .98.  So we should consider an extra value in our decimal.

Considering our whole number of 3.0, we can assume that our rounding will have an increase of about .01 or .015 in error.

Thus our number will be 3.04 + .01.

Making our quotient approximately 3.05.

Cheers.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Q(x)=x² − 6x − 2

To find Q(−4) substitute the value of x which is - 4 into Q(x)

That's

Q(-4) = (-4)² - 6(-4) - 2

Q(-4) = 16 + 24 - 2

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you