(7 + 10i)+(4-10i)-(7-5i)

Answer:

HOPE IT HELPS PLZ MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Step-by-step explanation:

A={1,2,3,4,5,6}

R={(x,y):y is divisible by x}

We know that any number (x) is divisible by itself.

(x,x)∈R

∴R is reflexive.

Now,(2,4)∈R [as 4 is divisible by 2]

But,(4,2)∈ /

R. [as 2 is not divisible by 4]

∴R is not symmetric.

Let (x,y),(y,z)∈R. Then, y is divisible by x and z is divisible by y.

∴z is divisible by x.

⇒(x,z)∈R

∴R is transitive.

Hence, R is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric.

Answer:

Translation

Step-by-step explanation:

A translation is when the triangle is moved around on the graph without it being reflected or changed in any way. I will be the same exact triangle, just with different coordinates.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Total earning last month with x articles is:

This is same amount as 2000

The equation is:

I can't see the diagram sorry.

Step-by-step explanation:

Is there supposed to be a picture attached?

Answer:

))

Step-by-step explanation:

just place your decimal once to the left I think

Answer:

the probability that we hit the bullseye at least 100 times is 0.0113

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data in the question;

Binomial distribution

We find the probability of hitting the dart on the disk

⇒ Area of small disk / Area of bigger disk

⇒ πR₁² / πR₂²

given that; disk-shaped board of radius R² = 5, disk-shaped bullseye with radius R₁ = 1

so we substitute

⇒ π(1)² / π(5)² = π/π25 = 1/25 = 0.04

Since we have to hit the disk 2000 times, we represent the number of times the smaller disk ( BULLSEYE ) will be hit by X.

so

X ~ Bin( 2000, 0.04 )

n = 2000

p = 0.04

np = 2000 × 0.04 = 80

Using central limit theorem;

X ~ N( np, np( 1 - p ) )

we substitute

X ~ N( 80, 80( 1 - 0.04 ) )

X ~ N( 80, 80( 0.96 ) )

X ~ N( 80, 76.8 )

So, the probability that we hit the bullseye at least 100 times, P( X ≥ 100 ) will be;

we covert to standard normal variable

⇒ P( X ≥  [tex]\frac{100-80}{\sqrt{76.8} }[/tex] )

⇒ P( X ≥ 2.28217 )

From standard normal distribution table

P( X ≥ 2.28217 ) = 0.0113

Therefore, the probability that we hit the bullseye at least 100 times is 0.0113

Answer:

It should be the top right one

(with 6ft as the height)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It must be the lower to the left choice.

Step-by-step explanation:

As you can see, the net we have is composed of only triangles.

So we should be choosing a figure with a triangular base.

Our answers are narrowed down into the top right and lower left choices because both figures have triangular bases.

The other person down there chose the top right choice and was incorrect, so the answer should be the lower to the left figure.

Also, its the lower left figure because look at the triangular base, it is an isosceles meaning that two sides have the same length.

If the net says that the long side measures 9 ft, then the other two sides should be the same length and shorter than 9 ft. So the answer is the lower left figure.

Hope this helps

Answer:

$370,881

Step-by-step explanation:

firstly we we multiply 1,5% by 2yrs. the answer we get is 3,0%. we then multiply 3 % by $123,627 and get $370,881

If Lisa bought a house The value of the house increased by 1.5% each year for 2 years.  The value of the house was £123,627. The initial amount of the house is  95120.7.

Percentage, a relative value indicating hundredth parts of any quantity.

Given,

Lisa bought a house The value of the house increased by 1.5% each year for 2 years

By the end of 2 years, the value of the house was £123,627.

A=P(1+rt)

A is the final amount,

r is rate of interest

t is the time

P is principle amount.

123,627=P(1+1.5/100 (2))

123657=P(1+0.15(2))

123657=P(1+0.3)

123657=1.3P

Divide both sides by 1.3

P=95120.7

The initial amount of the house when Lisa bought is 95120.7

To learn more on Percentage click:

https://brainly.com/question/28269290

#SPJ2

Answer:

20

Step-by-step explanation:

6 + 2 = 8

8 + 3 = 11

11 + 4 =15

15 + 5 =20

Answer:

20

Step-by-step explanation:

the pattern is increase the number by one more than the increase before. so 6,8=2 greater

8-11=3 greater. 11-15=4 greater. so, 15+5=20 (with this answer being 5 greater continuing the pattern.)

Answer:

1/4 = x

Step-by-step explanation:

x - 2( 3x - 1 ) = 3x

Step 1 :- Distribute 2

x - 2 × 3x - 2 × 1 = 3x

x - 6x + 2 = 3x

Step 2:- Combine like terms

-5x + 2 = 3x

Step 3 :- Add 5x to both sides

-5x + 5x + 2 = 3x + 5x

2 = 8x

Step 4 :- Divide both side by 8

2/8 = 8x / 8

1/4 = x

Answer:

[tex]h=\sqrt{16(4)}[/tex]

[tex]h=8[/tex]

[tex]ANSWER:E) 8[/tex]

-------------------------------

~HOPE IT HELPS

~HAVE A GREAT DAY!!

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  x = 30 2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Angles 4 and 5 are complementary, so we have ...

  m∠4 +m∠5 = 90°

  (2x +4) +(x -6) = 90

  3x -2 = 90 . . . . . . . . . collect terms

  3x = 92 . . . . . . . . . . add 2; next, divide by 3

  x = 92/3 = 30 2/3

Given:

The triangle ABC is reflected over the x-axis.

The distance between point A and A’ is 14.

To find:

The distance between the x-axis and A’.

Solution:

If a figure is reflected across the x-axis then the corresponding parts are mirror image of each other about the x-axis.

It means the distance between A and x-axis is same as the distance between x-axis and A'.

The distance between point A and A’ is 14.

Let d be the distance between the x-axis and A’. Then,

[tex]d+d=14[/tex]

[tex]2d=14[/tex]

[tex]d=\dfrac{14}{2}[/tex]

[tex]d=7[/tex]

Therefore, the correct option is 1.

Solution :

Using the TI-84 PLUS calculator

a). Area : 0.41

μ = 75

σ = 9

InvNorm(0.41,75,9)

= 72.95209525

Therefore, the 41st percentile of the scores is 72.95209525

b).  Area : 0.74

μ = 75

σ = 9

InvNorm(0.74,75,9)

= 80.79010862

Therefore, the 74st percentile of the scores is 80.79010862

c). 8%

So,  Area : 0.92

μ = 75

σ = 9

InvNorm(0.92,75,9)

= 87.64564405

Therefore, X =  80.79010862

Answer:

The answer is "0.4329 ".

Step-by-step explanation:

P( three in favor of FA)

Select 3 out of 6 FA supporters then select 2 out of 5 FB supportive judges  

[tex]=\frac{^{6}_{C_{3}}\times ^{5}_{C_{2}}}{^{11}_{C_{5}}}\\\\=\frac{\frac{6!}{3!(6-3)!}\times \frac{5!}{2!(5-2)!}}{\frac{11!}{5!(11-5)!}}\\\\=\frac{\frac{6!}{3! \times 3!}\times \frac{5!}{2! \times 3!}}{\frac{11!}{5! \times 6!}}\\\\=\frac{\frac{6 \times 5 \times 4 \times 3!}{3 \times 2 \times 1\times 3!}\times \frac{5 \times 4 \times 3!}{2 \times 1 \times 3!}}{\frac{11 \times10 \times 9 \times 8 \times 7 \times 6! }{5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1 \times 6!}}\\\\[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{ (5 \times 4) \times(5 \times 2)}{(11 \times 3 \times 2 \times 7 )}\\\\=\frac{ 20 \times 10 }{(11 \times 42)}\\\\=\frac{ 200 }{462}\\\\=\frac{100 }{231}\\\\=0.4329[/tex]

Answer:

6^3

6 to the third power

or 3x3x3

Step-by-step explanation:

The solution of the expression 6⁻⁴.6⁶ will be 6².

Expression in maths is defined as the collection of numbers variables and functions by using signs like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

Numbers (constants), variables, operations, functions, brackets, punctuation, and grouping can all be represented by mathematical symbols, which can also be used to indicate the logical syntax's order of operations and other features.

Given that the expression is 6⁻⁴.6⁶. The expression will be solved as below:-

6⁻⁴.6⁶ = 6⁻⁴⁺⁶

Use the exponent property when the bases are the same then the powers will be added.

6⁻⁴.6⁶ = 6²

Therefore, the solution of the expression 6⁻⁴.6⁶ will be 6².

The complete question is to simplify the expression 6⁻⁴.6⁶.

To know more about an expression follow

https://brainly.com/question/8844911

#SPJ2

Answer:

f(x+1) = -3/4 × f(x)

Step-by-step explanation:

first of all, the sign of the numbers in the sequence is alternating. so, there must be a "-" involved.

that eliminates the first and third answer options.

and the absolute values of the numbers in the sequence are going down. |f(x+1)| < |f(x)|

that eliminates the fourth answer option, as this says that

|f(x)| < |f(x+1)|. and that is the opposite of how the actual sequence behaves.

Answer:

l don't know

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

14.077 feet to the nearest thousandth.

Step-by-step explanation:

First let's work out the multiplier:

6 + 5 + 2 = 13.

61/2 = 30.5

- so the multiplier is 30.5/13 = 2.34615

The longest piece refers to the 6 in the ratio its length

= 6 * 2.34615

= 14.0769 ft.

Answer:

La suma de las dos matrices cuadradas de dimensión 2 es [tex]\vec U = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-1&11\\2&5\end{array}\right][/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

Considerando que se tratan de dos matrices de igual dimensión y cuyos elementos son números reales, conocemos que la adición entre dos matrices consiste en las sumas de los elementos de igual posición, esto es, los elementos que están localizados en las mismas filas y columnas, entonces, la suma es:

[tex]\vec A = \left[\begin{array}{cc}1&2\\-1&0\end{array} \right][/tex], [tex]\vec B = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-2&9\\3&5\end{array}\right][/tex]

[tex]\vec U = \vec A + \vec B = \left[\begin{array}{cc}1 + (-2)&2+9\\-1 + 3&0 + 5\end{array}\right][/tex]

[tex]\vec U = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-1&11\\2&5\end{array}\right][/tex]

La suma de las dos matrices cuadradas de dimensión 2 es [tex]\vec U = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-1&11\\2&5\end{array}\right][/tex].

Answer:

the answer is x = 2 or B, hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]A = \left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&-1&-3&-5\\4&2&0&-2\\7&5&3&1\end{array}\right][/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

A = (aij)

i representa a linha e j a coluna.

Tipo 3x4

Isto implica que a matriz tem 3 linhas e 4 colunas.

aij = 3i – 2j.

Primeira linha:

[tex]a_{1,1} = 3(1) - 2(1) = 1[/tex]

[tex]a_{1,2} = 3(1) - 2(2) = -1[/tex]

[tex]a_{1,3} = 3(1) - 2(3) = -3[/tex]

[tex]a_{1,4} = 3(1) - 2(4) = -5[/tex]

Segunda linha:

[tex]a_{2,1} = 3(2) - 2(1) = 4[/tex]

[tex]a_{2,2} = 3(2) - 2(2) = 2[/tex]

[tex]a_{2,3} = 3(2) - 2(3) = 0[/tex]

[tex]a_{2,4} = 3(2) - 2(4) = -2[/tex]

Terceira linha:

[tex]a_{3,1} = 3(3) - 2(1) = 7[/tex]

[tex]a_{3,2} = 3(3) - 2(2) = 5[/tex]

[tex]a_{3,3} = 3(3) - 2(3) = 3[/tex]

[tex]a_{3,4} = 3(3) - 2(4) = 1[/tex]

Matriz:

A matriz é dada por:

[tex]A = \left[\begin{array}{cccc}1&-1&-3&-5\\4&2&0&-2\\7&5&3&1\end{array}\right][/tex]

Answer:

B - 82%

Step-by-step explanation:

.34+.48

The percentage of people who can swim is 82%.

Option B is the correct answer.

The percentage means the required value out of 100.

It is calculated by dividing the required value by the total value and multiplying it by 100.

The percentage change is also calculated using the same method.

In percentage change, we find the difference between the values given.

Example:

Required percentage value = a

total value = b

Percentage = a/b x 100

We have,

The relative frequency table shows the proportion of people in each group who can and cannot swim.

To find the percentage of people who can swim, we need to add up the proportion of adults who can swim (0.34) and the proportion of children who can swim (0.48).

Percentage of people who can swim

= (0.34 + 0.48) x 100%

= 82%

Therefore,

The percentage of people who can swim is 82%.

Learn more about percentages here:

https://brainly.com/question/11403063

#SPJ5

Answer: This problem is a fraction since we have several equal parts that make up one whole. The problem asks us to talk about the relationship of white pieces to the whole. Since we know the whole is made up of 7 pieces (4 blue parts and 3 white parts = 7 total parts), then 7 will be our denominator (number on the bottom of the fraction).

Now that we have our number on the bottom, we need to look back at the question to carefully decide what parts of the whole we are looking at. The question wants to know how many of the parts are white. We know that 3 of the parts are white, so that is our numerator (number of the top of the fraction).

Our final answer is 3/7 or "three-sevenths." Said another way, three of the seven pieces are white.

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to prove that ,

cot x / csc x - csc x / cot x = - tan x sec x .

LHS :-

> cot x / csc x - csc x / cot x

> cos x / sin x ÷ csc x - sin x × csc x / cos x

> cosx - 1/ cos x

> cos² x - 1 / cos x

> - sin²x / cosx

> -sin x / cos x × sin x

> -tan x sin x

= RHS

Hence Proved !

Answer:

5,5,6,6,13

Step-by-step explanation:

Mode means most often.  The 5 numbers has 2 modes 5 and 6

This means that 4 of the numbers must be 5,5,6,6

Median means the middle number must be 6

5,5,6,6,x is the only way to to get the middle number to be 6

We need to average to 7

(5+5+6+6+x) /5 = 7

(5+5+6+6+x) /5  *5= 7*5

(5+5+6+6+x) =35

22+x = 35

x = 35-22

x = 13

The other number is 13

Answer:

The p-value of the test is 0.1017, which is greater than the standard significance level of 0.05, which means that this is not good evidence that the mean real compensation μ of all CEOs increased that year.

Step-by-step explanation:

At the null hypothesis, we test if there was no increase, that is, the mean is 0, so:

[tex]H_0: \mu = 0[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if there was an increase, that is, the mean is greater than 0, so:

[tex]H_1: \mu > 0[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]t = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, s is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0[/tex]

104 companies, adjusted for inflation, in a recent year. The mean increase in real compensation was x¯=6.9%, and the standard deviation of the increases was s=55%.

This means that [tex]n = 104, X = 6.9, s = 55[/tex]

Value of the test-statistic:

[tex]t = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{6.9 - 0}{\frac{55}{\sqrt{104}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = 1.28[/tex]

P-value of the test:

The p-value of the test is a right-tailed test(test if the mean is greater than a value), with 104 - 1 = 103 df and t = 1.28.

Using a t-distribution calculator, this p-value is of 0.1017.

The p-value of the test is 0.1017, which is greater than the standard significance level of 0.05, which means that this is not good evidence that the mean real compensation μ of all CEOs increased that year.