8.73E16 in standard form

Answer:

6

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio would be 3:65, so to get it to ?:130 you would multiply by 2 (65•2=130). So all you have to do is do 3•2=6 to get the correct ratio which is 6:130. So that answer would be 6.

Answer:  yes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A = 3

B = 5.5

C = 11

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.45 -0.47}{\sqrt{\frac{0.47(1-0.47)}{631}}}=-1.007[/tex]  

Now we can find the p value with the alternative hypothesis and using this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(z<-1.007)=0.157[/tex]  

Since the p value is higher than the significance level given of 0.05 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of interest is not significantly lower than 0.47

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

n=631 represent the random sample selected

X=284 represent the people who said that they thought unemployment would increase

[tex]\hat p=\frac{284}{631}=0.45[/tex] estimated proportion of people who said that they thought unemployment would increase

[tex]p_o=0.47[/tex] is the value that we want to test

[tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v{/tex} represent the p value

System of hypothesis

We want to verify if the proportion of Australians in November 1997 who believe unemployment would increase is less than the proportion who felt it would increase in July 1997 (0.47), then the system of hypothesis are:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p\geq 0.47[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p < 0.47[/tex]  

The statistic would be given by:

[tex]z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.45 -0.47}{\sqrt{\frac{0.47(1-0.47)}{631}}}=-1.007[/tex]  

Now we can find the p value with the alternative hypothesis and using this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(z<-1.007)=0.157[/tex]  

Since the p value is higher than the significance level given of 0.05 we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of interest is not significantly lower than 0.47

Answer:

I think it's D

Step-by-step explanation:

The number never goes over 0 so there is no need to put anything above 0

Answer:

the answer is D. The second arrow he drew should have started at -15 instead of 0.

Step-by-step explanation:

was on a test I took and got 100

Answer:

A. X=6 only

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x=26

Step-by-step explanation:

(x+6)2=64

x+6=32

x=26

Answer:

Here is the solution. Mark as brainlist please.

Answer:

MC = 4.5cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Question:

Let the isosceles triangle ABC with AB = AC = 3 cm. if the mediator of the sides AC intersects with the side BC in M ​​and the perimeter of the triangle AMC = 12 cm. Calculate MC.

Solution:

Find attached the diagram used in solving the question.

Given:

∆ABC is an isosceles triangle (two sides and angles are equal)

AB = BC = 3cm

Perimeter of ∆AMC = 12cm

From the diagram, M cuts AC at the the middle.

AD = CD = AC/2 = 3/2

Perimeter of Right angled ∆AMD = AM + AD + MD

= 3/2 + AM +MD

Perimeter of Right angled ∆CMD =CM + CD + MD

= 3/2 + CM +MD

Right angled ∆AMD = Right angled ∆CMD

CM = AM

Therefore ∆AMC is an isosceles triangle

CM = AM (two sides of an isosceles triangle are equal)

Let CM = AM = x

Perimeter of ∆AMC = AM + CM + AC

12 = x + x + 3

12 = 2x + 3

2x = 12-3

2x = 9

x = 9/2 = 4.5

CM = AM = 4.5cm

MC = CM = 4.5cm

Answer:

D. 96

F. 32

Step-by-step explanation:

The inequality 3x ≥ 96, means that x and 3 must be multiplied to get a product that is greater than 96.  So to figure this out, you must plug in the numbers given for x, like so:

3x ≥ 96

A. 3(31) ≥ 96

     93 ≥ 96                            This is incorrect since 93 is not greater than 96

A tip that makes this easier is that, you can see that 31 multiplied by 3 is 93, which is only a couple numbers off 96, so all numbers after 31 will result in a product greater than 96. For example:

D. 3(96) ≥ 96

    288 ≥ 96                             This inequality is correct

F. 3(32) ≥ 96

   96 ≥ 96                        

The inequality sign states that the number must be either greater or equal to 96, which it is.

Answer:742 cm^3

Step-by-step explanation:

Height=h=12cm

Radius=r=5cm

π=3.14

volume of cylinder=π x r^2 x h

Volume of cylinder=π x r x r x h

Volume of cylinder=3.14 x 5 x 5 x 12

Volume of cylinder=742 cm^3

Answer:

300

Step-by-step explanation:

5x60=5x6 tens it equal to 30 tens. 30 tens equals 300

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

there are 6 tens in 60!

5x60 = 5 x 6 tens

= 30 tens

= 300

Answer: D

Substitute 0 for x and to find the y-intercept.

y-intercept(s): (0,5)

Answer:

  A number line going from negative 1 to positive 7. An open circle is at 3. Everything to the right of the circle is shaded.

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a parallelogram is given by the formula ...

  A = bh

So, we have the condition that ...

  A > 42

  bh > 42 . . . . . substitute the expression for area

  14h > 42 . . . . fill in the given base

  h > 3 . . . . . . . divide by 14

Numbers greater than 3 are to the right of 3 on the number line.

_____

The relation is > rather than ≥, so the "or equal to" case is not included. That is why the circle is open, rather than solid.

Answer:

a).

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A. 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

20x=10

Divide 20 on both sides of the equation to get x by itself

20x=10

___.  __

20.     20

x =1/2

Answer:

A) x= 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

20x= 10 we then divide 10 by 20 to get x= 10/20 or if we simplify x= 1/2. Thus answer choice A) is correct!

Answer:

You can tell if a table is linear by looking at how X and Y change. If, as X increases by 1, Y increases by a constant rate, then a table is linear.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helped~

Answer:

You can tell if a table is linear by looking at how X and Y change.If,as X increases by 1, Y increases by a constant rate,then a table is linear.

Answer:

C. (5x + 6) (5x - 6)

Step-by-step explanation:

25 is a perfect square, meaning its two factors are identical (5), and 36 is also a perfect square with two identical factors (6). With this information, we can split the expression below like this:

[tex]25x^2 - 36\\(5x ) (5x )[/tex]

Since 36 is negative, we have to have a positive 6 and a negative 6:

(5x - 6) (5x + 6)

Answer:

The average of the extracted scores that are extreme values (outliers) = 102

Step-by-step explanation:

With the logical assumption that the population size is large enough, for a normal distribution,

68% of the data lies within 1 standard deviation of the mean.

95% of the data lies between 2 standard deviations of the mean.

99.7% of the data lies within 3 standard deviations of the mean.

So, the outliers for a normal distribution are usually beyond 3 standard deviations of the mean.

The mean = 128.5

Standard deviation = 8.2

The range of scores within 3 standard deviations of the mean is obtainable thus

(Mean ± 3standard deviations)

3 × standard deviations = 3 × 8.2 = 24.6

(128.5 ± 24.6) = (103.9, 153.1)

The 3 extracted scores are 148, 102 and 152. The only extreme value of these 3 extracted scores is 102. The two other scores are within the range of 3 standard deviations of the mean.

Hence, the average of the extracted scores that are extreme values (outliers) = 102

Hope this Helps!!!

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

Two years ago, she was 32. One half of 32 is 16 Her cousin was 16 two years ago 16 plus 2 = 18 Her cousin is now 18

34 - 2 = 32

32/2 = 16

16 + 2 = 18

Answer = 18

Answer:

18

Step-by-step explanation:

2 years ago she was 32. Since she was twice as old, you will divide 32 by two which will give you 16. You will then add 2 since that was two years ago which will give you 18.

Answer:

kitchen

Step-by-step explanation:

if a foot is 2.389 then i would be pretty far but not a block away

Answer:

c.) $3,780

Step-by-step explanation:

9/100 × $42,000

= 9 × $420

= $3,780

Answer: 1050 people.

Step-by-step explanation: It's a rule of three question.

15/50 as x/3500

Then you have that 50x = 52500

x = 1050

There you have it.

Answer:24

Step-by-step explanation:

28=x+4

Collect like terms

x=28-4

x=24

Answer:7cm

Step-by-step explanation:

m^3=343

Take the cube root of both sides

m=7

Answer:

y = (-1/2)x + 9/2

Step-by-step explanation:

the equation of a straight line can be written as;

y = mx + c ......1

Where;

m = slope

c = intercept

For two lines to be perpendicular their slope must be opposite reciprocal of each other.

m1 × m2 = -1 .....2

Given;

The equation Contains (3, 3); and perpendicular to the line y = 2x - 1

Slope of the given equation m1 = 2

Slope of the line m2; substituting m1 to equation 2.

2 × m2 = -1

m2 = -1/2

So,

y = (-1/2)x + c

To solve for c, let's substitute the given point on the line; (3,3).

3 = (-1/2)(3) + c

3 = -3/2 + c

c = 3 + 3/2

c = 9/2

Therefore, the equation of the line that has the given properties is;

y = (-1/2)x + 9/2

Answer:

-5/2

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find the slope of a perpendicular line: negate the reciprocal of the original slope

Answer:

Basically it's asking for the sum of 212 + 216 + 220 + ..... 586

Each number is 22 more than the previous one.

Therefore the sum will be 212 + (212+22) + (212+22*2) + (212+22*3)

the amount of numbers from 212 through 586 is 18.

Therefore we will need 212 plus 212 * 17 = 3,816 *******************

We will also need all those 22's.

We must add 22 *1 plus 22*2 plus 22*3 ..... plus 22*17

Which equals 22 + 44 + 66 + 88 ... 374

Which totals 3,366 *****************

So, we total 3,816 + 3,366 which equals 7,182

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\displaystyle\bf\\Sum=586+564+542+...+212\\\\Sum=212+234+256+...+586\\\\\textbf{We calculate the number of terms (n):}\\\\n=\frac{586-212}{22}+1=\frac{374}{22}+1=17+1=18\\\\\boxed{\bf~n=18~terms}\\\\Sum=\frac{n(586+212)}{2}\\\\Sum=\frac{18\times 798}{2}\\\\Sum=9\times798\\\\\boxed{\bf~Sum=7182}[/tex]

Answer:

We conclude that the average sodium content in all Jupiter Bars is actually more than 96 milligrams.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that there is a concern that the average sodium content in all Jupiter Bars is actually more than 96 milligrams, and we have been asked to investigate.

Summary statistics:

n = 20

sample mean = 100.55

sample standard deviation = 6.304

Q = 97: median = 101: Q3 = 104

Let [tex]\mu[/tex] = average sodium content in all Jupiter Bars.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] = 96 milligrams     {means that the average sodium content in all Jupiter Bars is equal to 96 milligrams}

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] > 96 milligrams     {means that the average sodium content in all Jupiter Bars is actually more than 96 milligrams}

The test statistics that would be used here One-sample t test statistics as we don't know about the population standard deviation;

                       T.S. =  [tex]\frac{\bar X-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_n_-_1[/tex]

where, [tex]\bar X[/tex] = sample mean sodium content = 100.55

            s = sample standard deviation = 6.304

            n = sample of Jupiter bars = 20

So, the test statistics  =  [tex]\frac{100.55-96}{\frac{6.304}{\sqrt{20} } }[/tex]  ~ [tex]t_1_9[/tex]

                                       =  3.228

The value of t test statistics is 3.228.

Now, at 5% significance level the t table gives critical value of 1.729 at 19 degree of freedom for right-tailed test.

Since our test statistic is more than the critical value of t as 3.228 > 1.729, so we have sufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region due to which we reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that the average sodium content in all Jupiter Bars is actually more than 96 milligrams.

Answer:

$9.32

Step-by-step explanation:

If she paid $11 for the salad, then the three pizzas cost 38.95 - 11.00 which is 27.95.  Divide that by three and you get $9.32 (if you round to the nearest penny)

Answer:4.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Percentage decrease=(65-62)/65 x 100

Percentage decrease=3/65 x 100

Percentage decrease=(3x100)/65

Percentage decrease=300/65

percentage decrease=4.6