It is true that a crime scene sketch may have probative value if entered as evidence in a court of law.
What is a court of law?A court of law is a judicial forum where disputes are resolved according to the laws and rules of the government. It is a place where a judge presides and hears both parties in a legal dispute and makes a ruling based on the evidence presented. Courts of law are essential for the administration of justice and for upholding the rule of law. The court system is the basis for the American legal system, which is based on common law. In the United States, the court system is comprised of federal and state courts. The Supreme Court is the highest in the land and is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and federal laws.
A crime scene sketch may have probative value if entered as evidence in a court of law. This is because a crime scene sketch may be used to provide a visual representation of the crime scene and to help demonstrate the facts of the case.
It can be concluded that it is true that a crime scene sketch may have probative value if entered as evidence in a court of law.
To know more about, the court of law, check this link:
https://brainly.com/question/22499117
#SPJ1
restaurants are not generally covered under the state laws that limit the liability of innkeepers, which can increase their risk.
Restaurants are not generally covered under the state laws that limit the liability of innkeepers, which can increase their risk. Given Statement are True.
State law is the legal system of a federated state, as opposed to the legal system of the federation of which it is a member. When the individual members of a federation are referred to as states, it is used.
The most prevalent illustration is that each state has its own license requirements and traffic laws that must be followed for people who drive a car, ride a motorcycle, or operate a truck. Every state has its own collection of laws governing criminal behavior in addition to those governing infractions and traffic tickets.
Learn more about State law to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ4
This law requires all schools in the National School Lunch Act to implement a school-wide plan addressing physical activity and nutrition.
Answer:
The law you are referring to is the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, also known as the Child Nutrition Reauthorization Act. This legislation amended and reauthorized the National School Lunch Act and other federal child nutrition programs. It includes provisions that require schools participating in the National School Lunch Program to develop and implement a school-wide wellness policy that addresses physical activity and nutrition. The goal of the wellness policy is to promote the health and well-being of students by providing healthy food options and opportunities for physical activity. The Act also established new nutrition standards for foods and beverages sold in schools, including vending machines, a la carte items, and school stores, in an effort to ensure that students have access to healthier food choices.
The threat, use, or conspiracy to use _____ within the United States or against an American citizen abroad is punishable under federal law.
The threat, use, or conspiracy to use weapons of mass destruction within the United States or against an American citizen abroad is punishable under federal law.
The municipalities, states, and the federal government each tend to have their own criminal codes, which tend to define the types of conduct that constitute crimes. So, the Title 18 of the U.S. Code outlines all the federal crimes.
However, a crime is an unlawful act which is said to be punishable by a state or the other authority. Thus, the use of mass destruction is said to be punishable under the federal law.
Hence, treason is the only crime which is defined in the U.S. Constitution.
To learn more about federal law here:
https://brainly.com/question/28498485
#SPJ4
A contract to do something that is prohibited by statutory law is void from the outset.
A contract or agreement to do something that is prohibited by federal or state statutory law is illegal. As such, it is void from the outset and thus unenforceable. Also a contract this is tortious or call for an actin contrary to public policy is illegal and unenforceable.
An settlement is a manifestation of mutual assent by way of or extra men and women to each other. it's far a meeting of the minds in a commonplace goal, and is made via provide and popularity. An agreement can be proven from words, behavior, and in some cases, even silence. agreement manner that sentence elements fit. subjects have to consider verbs, and pronouns should accept as true with antecedents. Singular subjects need singular verbs; plural subjects need plural verbs. In grammar, wide variety refers to the two sorts of a phrase: singular (one) or plural (multiple).
A contract is an agreement, however an agreement isn't always a settlement. An settlement can be casual or it is able to be written; a contract may be verbal or written, however a settlement will always be enforceable if it includes positive necessities.
An settlement is a manifestation of mutual assent by way of or extra men and women to each other. it's far a meeting of the minds in a commonplace goal, and is made via provide and popularity. An agreement can be proven from words, behavior, and in some cases, even silence. agreement manner that sentence elements fit. subjects have to consider verbs, and pronouns should accept as true with antecedents. Singular subjects need singular verbs; plural subjects need plural verbs. In grammar, wide variety refers to the two sorts of a phrase: singular (one) or plural (multiple).
A contract is an agreement, however an agreement isn't always a settlement. An settlement can be casual or it is able to be written; a contract may be verbal or written, however a settlement will always be enforceable if it includes positive necessities.
Learn more about agreement here: https://brainly.com/question/24460932
#SPJ4
through which of the following theories can an employee-plaintiff prove discrimination under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964?
Through the following theories, an employee-plaintiff can prove discrimination under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964
Disparate treatmentDisparate impactDisparate equityDisparate treatment, disparate impact, and disparate equityDisparate treatment and disparate impact, but not disparate equityWhat is Disparate impact?Generally, In the context of employment and housing law in the United States, the term "disparate effect" refers to actions that negatively affect one group of persons with a protected feature more than another, despite the fact that the laws implemented by employers or landlords are legally neutral.
An example of a disproportionate effect would be the employment of more males than women in the construction industry due to physical height or strength requirements (unintentional discrimination).
Read more about employee-plaintiff
https://brainly.com/question/28547296
#SPJ1
Which one do you think it could be
Answer:
Explanation:
2
based on the above table, which information provides an example of individual interest groups maximizing their chances of creating influential relationships in congress
Interest groups in securities, investments, and real estate contributed approximately $50 million, or a nearly equal share, to each congressional political party can be said to be attempt of interest groups maximizing their chances.
About Interest groups
Interest groups, also known as special interest groups, advocacy groups, or pressure groups, are associations of people or organisations that are often formally constituted and that aim to sway public policy in their favour based on one or more common concerns. All interest groups have the common objective to influence governmental policy in order to advance their causes or themselves. Their objective may be a policy that only helps a certain set of people or a particular sector of society (such as government aid for farmers) or a policy which furthers a larger societal aim (e.g., improving air quality). By exerting pressure on decision-makers to change policy outcomes in the favour, they try to lobby in order to achieve their aims.
The question is incomplete so I have answered it in general sense as per my knowledge.
To know more about Interest groups:
brainly.com/question/28590155
#SPJ4
which of the designs violate(s) the first law of thermodynamics? give the letter(s) of the design(s) in alphabetical order, without commas or spaces (e.g., acd).
A perpetual motion machine of the first sort is a device that defies the First Law of Thermodynamics by producing energy.
The second law's validity is statistical rather than mathematical because it rests on the fact that the bodies we deal with are made up of millions of molecules. Because of this, any efficiency tiny set of molecules consistently and significantly violates the first law of thermodynamics. The second law of thermodynamics is broken by a heat engine that claims to be more efficient than the Carnot efficiency. The first law clearly states that no apparatus that produces heat or meaningful work can exist without using energy from some source. Since it was established 140 years ago, there have never been any exceptions to this rule. These kinds of machines are unreal and go against the first law of thermodynamics. The first law of thermodynamics has a flaw in that it says nothing about the direction in which heat flows. No efficiency is given as to whether the procedure is spontaneous or not. The process cannot be reversed. In reality, not all of the heat is converted into work.
Learn more about first law of thermodynamics here:
brainly.com/question/3808473
#SPJ4
under the , a person is guilty of attempt when his or her conduct is very close to succeeding at a crime.
Actus Reus: "Guilty Act," the unlawful act that constitutes the material element of a crime and is a requirement for proving criminal culpability.
The step of attempt comes after the stage of preparation and is unlawful. The term "stage of attempt" describes the effort made by a person to carry out their plan and complete the crime. Intent and some progress toward committing the crime are the two components of an guilty offense. Mens rea is the legal word denoting a guilty disposition. You must have been aware of your actions for them to be considered criminal. But it is more than that. The guilty of consciousness necessary to establish the crime varies on the and a variety of other crimes are only a few examples of attempts. It is guilty for the accused to try to someone on the phone or commit a murder with an unloaded pistol. Either intention or are necessary mental states for the majority of crimes.
Learn more about crimes here:
brainly.com/question/4039905
#SPJ4
Tax planning motivations usually predominate over other objectives in deciding whether to create a trust.
It is untrue that when deciding whether to create a trust, tax planning considerations typically take precedence over other goals. Instead, the choice to establish a trust is made before considering the tax implications.
Financial planning aimed at reducing taxes is referred to as tax planning. It aims to lower one's tax obligations and make the best use of benefits, tax breaks, and exemptions.Making financial and business decisions to reduce the impact of tax is a part of tax planning.Although there are many ways to approach tax planning, it primarily entails three fundamental strategies: lowering your actual income, maximizing the amount of tax deductions you claim throughout the year, and utilizing certain tax credits.Long ago, the fundamentals of effective taxation were established. The four pillars of efficiency, fairness, certainty and convenience were proposed by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations (1776).Therefore, it is false that tax planning concerns tend to take primacy over other objectives when deciding whether to create a trust.
Learn more about Tax planning here: https://brainly.com/question/28330970
#SPJ4
in california, when the bailee has exclusive possession and control of objects belonging to its customers in the normal course of its business, a court is likely to enforce the exculpatory clause.
Indeed in California, when the bailee has exclusive possession and control of objects belonging to its customers in the normal course of its business, a court is likely to enforce the exculpatory clause.
About Exculpatory Clause
A contract's exculpatory provision forbids one party of holding the other party accountable for harm caused by the contract. Exculpatory clauses are frequently included in purchases like those that come with a ticket to a theme park or a flight. Courts may strike down exculpatory terms when they are buried inside a contract or have too broad of scope that goes against public policy. Courts frequently disapprove of exculpatory clauses since they allow a party to avoid accountability.
It is a clause in a contract that aims to absolve one party of responsibility if the other party suffers harm.
To know more about Exculpatory Clause:
brainly.com/question/27222495
#SPJ4
In some jurisdictions, minors who become ____ means that they cannot void a contract, despite their apparent minority. Ratification.
In some jurisdictions, minors who become Ratification means that they cannot void a contract, despite their apparent minority.
Appellate jurisdiction, in which a advanced court docket has energy to correct felony mistakes made in a decrease court; concurrent jurisdiction, wherein a healthy might be delivered to any of two or greater courts; and federal jurisdiction (as antagonistic, for example, to kingdom jurisdiction).
Its special unique jurisdiction extends to any dispute among the government of India and one or more States or among the government of India and any kingdom or States on one aspect and one or extra States on the alternative or between or more States, if and insofar as the dispute entails any question (whether of law .
Some commonplace synonyms of jurisdiction are authority, command, control, dominion, energy, and sway. whilst a majority of these words imply "the proper to govern or rule or determine," jurisdiction applies to legitimate power exercised inside prescribed limits.
Learn more about jurisdiction here
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
Which are rights of U.S. citizens who are convicted of a crime?
the right to join the military
the right to a speedy trial
the right to talk to an attorney
the right to an education while in jail
the right to make at least one phone call every day
Select all that apply.
Answer: The right to make at least one phone call and the right to talk to an attorney
Explanation:
Governors' formal powers to force the legislature to enact legislation, especially the veto authority and the power to call special sessions, are referred to as ____________ powers.
Governors' formal powers to force the legislature to enact legislation, especially the veto authority and the power to call special sessions, are referred to as legislative powers.
Legislative power is the capacity of a legislative chamber or actors within that chamber to thwart, encourage, or compel actions by others. introduction. energy is a hard concept to outline and possibly even harder to measure.
All legislative power in the government is vested in Congress, meaning that it's miles the only part of the government that could make new legal guidelines or trade current legal guidelines. govt department groups problem policies with the full pressure of law, but these are only below the authority of laws enacted by Congress.
The legislative branch of government is liable for enacting the laws of the country and appropriating the cash necessary to operate the government.
Learn more about Legislative here: https://brainly.com/question/13267720
#SPJ4
Members of the Texas Supreme Court are ____.
always appointed to the bench by the governor of Texas.
normally elected to the bench by the voters of Texas.
appointed for a life term by a vote of the plural executive.
always appointed to the bench by the president of the United States.
elected to the bench by the Texas Senate in a vote of the full Senate under the authority of their advice and consent power.
Members of the Texas Supreme Court are normally elected to the bench by the voters of Texas. Thus correct option (b)
The Supreme Court of Texas (SCOTX) is the court of last resort for civil matters (including juvenile delinquency cases, which are categorized as civil under the Texas Family Code) in the U.S. state of Texas. A different court, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA), is the court of last resort in criminal matters.
The Court has its seat at the Supreme Court Building on the State Capitol grounds in Austin, Texas.
The Texas Supreme Court consists of a Chief Justice and eight associate justices. All nine positions are elected, with a term of office of six years and no term limit.
Learn more about Texas Supreme Court are to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/12536385
#SPJ4
who among the following dominated the politics and government of the republic of texas? multiple select question. sam houston allan shivers bill clements stephen austin mirabeau lamar
Out of the choices provided above, it can be said that Sam Houston and Mirabeau Lamar dominated the politics and government of the Republic of Texas. Therefore, the options A and D hold true.
The Republic of Texas was an independently governed state, and was not a part of the United States for a prolonged period of time. Its constitution was completely different from that of the United States, and the national constitution was not applicable or enforceable in the state of Texas. Sam Houston and Mirabeau Lamar were the political leaders who dominated the Republic of Texas.
Learn more about the Republic of Texas here:
https://brainly.com/question/12880388
#SPJ4
in troll line fishing company's suit against uniharvest, inc., the jury returns a verdict in troll line's favor. uniharvest files a motion stating that even if the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to troll line, a reasonable jury should not have found in its favor. this is a motion for
Uniharvest files a motion stating that even if the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to troll line, a reasonable jury should not have found in its favor. This is a motion for judgment n.o.v.
A decision as a matter of law that is occasionally given following a jury trial is known as judgement notwithstanding the verdict, also known as judgement non obstante veredicto, or JNOV. Non obstante veredicto, which can be translated as "notwithstanding the verdict," is the Latin phrase for which the abbreviation NOV was created. In the context of JNOV (judgement non obstante veredicto), NOV or non obstante veredicto is typically used to refer to a judgement entered for one party despite a jury's verdict.
To know more about jury
https://brainly.com/question/28580385
#SPJ4
in a bench trial, the prosecutor seeks to make sure there is no doubt in the mind or minds of what entity that the defendant is guilty?
In a bench trial, the prosecutor seeks to make sure there is no doubt in the mind or minds of victim's family that the defendant is guilty.
What is bench trial?Bench trials, as opposed to jury trials, are judge-led trials. To distinguish the type of trial, the term is most appropriately used in relation to any administrative hearing regarding a summary offense. Bench trials are used in many legal systems for most or all cases, or for particular types of cases.
In a bench trial, the judge determines the procedural and evidentiary matters and serves as the fact-finder in place of the jury. The judge will render judgments, consider the evidence, and determine whether or not the defendant is guilty.
The trial procedure should be the same whether it is a bench trial or a jury trial, and if you are found guilty, you have the right to appeal your conviction to a higher court.
Learn more about bench trial
https://brainly.com/question/1150855
#SPJ1
discribe about the posibile impact of respecting cultural gambr reliogion and political equality multc nation states like
interest groups that rely on a judicial strategy to advance their cause are careful in which of the following ways?
Interest groups that rely on a judicial strategy to advance their cause are careful in their choice of cases that have a chance of success.
About Interest groups
Interest group lobbying is a sort of marketing and advertising used by our government. Interest groups are formalised associations of people with related goals who make an effort to sway policy makers. Additionally, interest groups typically unite around a single central issue, such as gun control, labour rights, marriage equality, etc., and employ lobbyists or other individuals who work to influence legislation and governmental administrative decisions in an effort to pass laws that advance their primary objectives. Thus, much as advertisements sway our purchasing decisions, interest groups lobby for the passage of legislation that advances their goals.
To know more about Interest groups:
brainly.com/question/28590155
#SPJ4
FILL IN THE BLANK. ___ are only lidely to include member from allthree brances of government when contorl of congress is divided
Congress is only likely to include a member from all three branches of government when control of congress is divided.
The united states Congress is the legislature of the federal government of the USA. it's far bicameral, composed of a lower frame, the residence of Representatives, and a top frame, the Senate. It meets in the America Capitol in Washington, D.C. Senators and representatives are chosen through direct election, although vacancies inside the Senate can be stuffed through a governor's appointment. Congress has 535 vote-casting participants: one hundred senators and 435 representatives. The vice chairman of the united states has a vote in the Senate most effective when senators are evenly divided. The residence of Representatives has six non-balloting members.
The setting of a Congress is for a -12 months time period, at present, beginning every different January. Elections are held each even-numbered 12 months on Election Day. The members of the House of Representatives are elected for the two-yr time period of a Congress. The Reapportionment Act of 1929 establishes that there be 435 Representatives and the Uniform Congressional Redistricting Act calls for them to be elected from unmarried-member constituencies or districts. it is also required that the Congressional districts be apportioned amongst states by using populace every ten years the usage of the America Census consequences, supplied that each nation has at least one Congressional representative. each senator is elected at-large in their country for a six-yr term, with phrases staggered, so each year about one-third of the Senate is up for election. each nation, regardless of population or length, has two senators, so presently, there are one hundred senators for the 50 states.
Learn more about Congress here https://brainly.com/question/779570
#SPJ4
a government order that prevents the departure of ships or other property to another country; may be civil or hostile; may be used as a form of international punishment.
In general, federal maritime law supplements and overrides most state and other federal laws. The underlying goal is uniformity of the legal rights and remedies that affect the world of shipping and maritime commerce.
Maritime regulation, also referred to as admiralty law, is a frame of legal guidelines, conventions, and treaties that govern non-public maritime commercial enterprise and different nautical subjects, which includes transport or offenses going on on open water. worldwide rules governing the usage of the oceans and seas are called the law of the ocean.
Admiralty regulation or maritime regulation is a body of regulation that governs nautical troubles and private maritime disputes. Admiralty regulation consists of both domestic regulation on maritime activities, and personal global regulation governing the relationships among non-public parties operating or the usage of ocean-going ships.
Learn more about maritime law here: https://brainly.com/question/21375654
#SPJ4
a major risk faced by a swap dealer is sovereign risk. this is the probability that a sovereign counterparty will default. the probability that a country will impose exchange restrictions on a currency involved in an existing swap. the probability governments will intervene to support an exchange rate. none of the above
Option A, the probability that a counterparty will default
Counterparty risk is the likelihood that the other party in an investment, credit, or trading transaction won't carry out its end of the bargain and will break the terms of the agreement. Default risk is another name for counterparty risk. Default risk is the possibility that organisations or people won't be able to fulfil their debt obligations. Almost all types of credit extensions subject lenders and investors to default risk. The possibility that the other party in a credit, trade, or investment transaction won't fulfil their half of the deal and will violate the terms of the agreement is known as counterparty risk.
Know more about the Counterparty risk at: https://brainly.com/question/29658375
#SPJ4
The expression of beliefs, opinions, or ideas through forms other than verbal speech or print; speech involving actions and other non verbal expressions.
The expression of beliefs, opinions, or ideas through forms other than verbal speech or print; speech involving actions and other non-verbal expressions is known as a symbolic speech. Therefore, the option A holds true.
A symbolic speech can be referred to or considered as a speech wherein the expression is done in completely non-verbal modes of communication with the audience. Moreover, it may also involve actions and gestures to be used as symbols in the scope of development of a speech to connect better with the audience.
Learn more about symbolic speech here:
https://brainly.com/question/29794726
#SPJ4
Complete Question
The expression of beliefs, opinions, or ideas through forms other than verbal speech or print; speech involving actions and other non verbal expressions.
Symbolic Speech
Seditious Speech
Commercial Speech
Joint rate means a rate which applies over the lines or routes of 2 or more carriers, which is made by arrangement or agreement between such carriers, and which is evidenced by concurrence or power of attorney." Joint tariffs " are those which contain joint rates.
Joint rate refers to a rate established between places on and over the permitted lines or routes of two or more carriers and supported by a power of attorney or concurrence. Such a tariff is referred to as a "combined tariff."
A rate established by agreement and published in a single tariff by all transportation lines to which it applies, and applicable from a point on one line to a point on another. The Commission gives filers the option of choosing between individual tariffs or a single market-based rate tariff for their whole company family. Corporate families can more easily arrange their computerized tariff databases, tariff records, and reporting requirements thanks to these so-called shared tariffs. When a corporate family uses a shared tariff, only the designated filer is required to submit tariff updates, such as when the category status changes or when the language in the tariff that has been approved by the Commission needs to be updated.
Learn more about Joint rate from
brainly.com/question/22595619
#SPJ4
a defendant's failure to do what a reasonable and prudent person would do in the samecircumstances creates liability for
Answer: Negligence
Explanation:
Explain how Congress could have addressed the increasing cost of insulin prior to 2017.
Prior to 2017, Congress has complete authority to enact legislation that covers both biologics and certain chemically created goods, such as insulin. The cost of insulin would have been lower if this legislation and the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act had been approved together in 2009.
What is Congress?Generally, The legislative body of the federal government of the United States of America is known as the United States Congress. It is bicameral, meaning that it is made up of two chambers: the House of Representatives, which is the lower body, and the Senate, which is the upper body. It has its meetings at the Capitol Building in Washington, District of Columbia.
Before 2017, Congress has all of the authority necessary to enact a statute that will not only encompass the chemically created items but also certain chemically produced biologics, such as insulin.
If this legislation and the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act had been approved in 2009 together, the cost of insulin may have been brought down to a more reasonable level.
Read more about Congress
https://brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ1
TRUE/FALSE. when detectives set out to solve a crime, they conduct extensive (1) investigations. gathering evidence, collecting clues, and interviewing witnesses. those who believe in the supernatural follow a similar approach. their hope is to establish a case for the existence of ghosts in haunted places.
True. When detectives set out to solve a crime, they conduct extensive investigations. gathering evidence, collecting clues, and interviewing witnesses. those who believe in the supernatural follow a similar approach. their hope is to establish a case for the existence of ghosts in haunted places.
An investigator who works for a law enforcement agency is known as a detective. Talking to witnesses and informants, gathering tangible evidence, reviewing databases, and interviewing sources are all common ways that investigators get information to solve crimes. As a result, they are able to apprehend offenders and prosecute them in court.
Learn more on crime
https://brainly.com/question/27187116
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE. in multiparty negotiations, research shows that parties who approached multiple issues simultaneously achieved lower quality agreements and decreased the likelihood of achieving agreement compared with groups that approached the issues one at a time, in a fixed or negotiated sequence.
A group of three or more people, each representing their own interests, engage in a multi-party negotiation in an effort to overcome apparent conflicts of interest or cooperate to accomplish a common goal.
The following are the distinctions between two-party and multiparty talks that make multiparty negotiations more complicated, demanding, and tough to manage: Parties: There are more negotiators present in multiparty discussions. Informational and computational complexity - Multiparty discussions include the introduction of more topics, viewpoints on issues, and overall information. Social complexity - The social setting shifts from an individual conversation to a group discussion. As a result, all the small-group dynamics start to influence how the negotiators act. The parties' motivational orientations toward one another may affect how the process develops. There could be social pressure for the group to behave in unison.
learn more about multiparty negotiations here:
https://brainly.com/question/29741447
#SPJ4
What type of insurance IS NOT REQUIRED by the Government?
