A plaintiff filed a negligence action against two defendants in federal district court, invoking the court's diversity of citizenship jurisdiction. Prior to serving their answers, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court denied the motion, concluding that subject matter jurisdiction was proper. The defendants then filed their answers responding to the merits of the complaint and denying negligence. The defendants' answers also contained motions to dismiss the action for lack of personal jurisdiction. Five weeks later, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the action for improper venue. If the court determines that venue in fact is improper, how should the court rule on the defendants' venue motion

Answer:

If the court determines that the venue is inappropriate, it will be necessary for the court to deny the venue motion.

Explanation:

If the court determines that the venue is inappropriate, it will be necessary for the court to deny the venue motion. This will be the right thing to do because the defendants did not raise any objections during the pre-answer motion that would demonstrate that they were seeking jurisdiction over the matter. In this case, the defendants waived any objection to the venue motion.

Aside from the president, who else has the authority to enact an executive order?

A). state governors

B). law enforcement officials

C). no one else

D). senators

Which of the following is not one of the support disciplines generally provided individuals incarcerated in a correctional facility?

How did Christian missionary work sometimes make it more difficult for European powers to control their conquered territories?

Cuál es la diferencia entre capacidad y derecho

In what types of situation should police officers be allowed to not enforce the law

The Law, Public Safety, and Security career cluster would include?

Teachers, Doctors, and Firefighters.
Police Officers, Firefighters, and Prison Guards.
Park Guides, Teachers, and Prison Guards.
Doctors, Police Officers, and Park Guides.

What are the steps through a civil case?

For any geometric figures A and B , if A ≈ B, then B ≈ A.

is a written set of instructions that tells a bank how to use money to pay someone.

Please help, I will give brainliest. I need more than one answer.



I am going to begin law school soon but I decided to write an opening statement to see if I am good or not. Sorry if it’s a bit all over the place but i tried. I just want to know your opinion.


Here it is



Diabetic Coma in Car Court Session
Law(s) broken : Driving Without License
Hello, the case I’m presenting to the court is for John and Jane Doe. This case is because Jane Doe drove her husband home because he was having a diabetic seizure in the car and his wife stopped the car and was in the process of driving him to the car when a police officer stopped them. I would like to start off with addressing that it is legal to break the law of murder. One of the biggest law as it includes taking a human’s life. It is legal to break that law if, and only if by breaking the law you save a human life or defend yourself. In this case the witness broke a law because their husband was having a diabetic coma. At most time during this case if there is only a single person in the car and that very person has a diabetic coma, it could cause destruction of property, a chain reaction car crash, and even the person’s life could be lost. Since there were 2 people in the car Ms. Jane stopped the car and was in the process of driving him to the hospital when a police officer stopped them. In the video she took you can see her and in the corner the navigation is set to the nearest hospital. I have asked for the body cam footage to present as deeper evidence and they agreed. Even in the body cam footage you can see that as well. There have been many cases in which the following case has been presented to the court in various different situations and have been exempted and excused of all charges. The law is to protect the people of America and have order, but in this case the law could cause a human life to be lost instead. Your honor, I believe that we can agree that the laws were set to protect the lives of Americans and to have order. What kind of order is there when you have about 5 families who have a loved one or even worse their entire family who has died, simply because of one person. The laws are meant to being justice to Americans, but what kind of justice is there in multiple people dying because of one man who didn’t even know what was happening. Thanks to Ms. Jane that didn’t happen, thanks to Ms. Jane, the possibility of that day being known as the day that many people lost their lives and all because one man who’s wife simply turned a blind eye to even though he was having a diabetic coma. But instead she followed the law even though she knew it would mean having many human lives lost. Possibly even hers. So I stand here in front of the court not asking you to rule for me, but instead to put yourself in the situation. What will you do, break the law to save other people. Or stand with the law even though it means you will probably end up killing others. Your honor, I don’t think there is much more to say. So with that, I rest my case. Hoping that this is enough to suit the court.

state and explain the law of demand​

Isaac lives in a country where when the police accuse someone of criminal behavior, that person is brought into a court. Then, a judge or group of judges determine whether that person is guilty of the crime they are charged with. What is an accurate description of this practice?

What states can I legally own a pet bat?

An inmate may be put in segregated housing for having a certain type of tattoo.

is it legal for someone to be deducted pay for getting hurt on the job?

is a 6.33 a D grade or a C grade