Alex and Annie each have 3 boxes of crayons. each box has 10 crayons. how many crayons do Alex and Annie have in all?

Answer:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

[tex]X_{1}=6[/tex] represent the complaints with the old dough

[tex]X_{2}=16[/tex] represent the complaints with the new dough

[tex]n_{1}=385[/tex] sample 1 selected  

[tex]n_{2}=340[/tex] sample 2 selected  

[tex]p_{1}=\frac{6}{385}=0.0156[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the old dough

[tex]p_{2}=\frac{16}{340}=0.0471[/tex] represent the proportion of complaints with the new dough

[tex]\hat p[/tex] represent the pooled estimate of p

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the value

Hypothesis to test

We want to verify if the proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough, the system of hypothesis would be:    

Null hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} \geq p_{2}[/tex]    

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p_{1} < p_{2}[/tex]    

The statitsic is given by:

[tex]z=\frac{p_{1}-p_{2}}{\sqrt{\hat p (1-\hat p)(\frac{1}{n_{1}}+\frac{1}{n_{2}})}}[/tex]   (1)  

Where [tex]\hat p=\frac{X_{1}+X_{2}}{n_{1}+n_{2}}=\frac{6+16}{385+340}=0.0303[/tex]  

Replacing the info provided we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.0156-0.0471}{\sqrt{0.0303(1-0.0303)(\frac{1}{385}+\frac{1}{340})}}=-2.469[/tex]    

Now we can calculate the p value with this probability:

[tex]p_v =P(Z<-2.469)= 0.0068[/tex]    

Since the p value is a very low value and using any significance level 5% or 10% we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true proportion of customer complaints using the old dough is less than the proportion of customer complaints using the new dough.

Answer:

  $3840

Step-by-step explanation:

The total cost is ...

  (6 hr)(cost per hr) +(120 persons)(food cost per person)

  = 6($190) +120($15 +7.50)

  = $3840

The booking at Hotel 3 would cost $3840.

Answer:

35%

Step-by-step explanation:

The total number of cinema seats can seat 280 people. Since 98 people take up 98 seats of the cinema, they are taking up 98 cinema seats out of the 280 cinema seats originally available.

As a fraction this would be written as  [tex]\frac{98}{280}[/tex] .

What you want to do is then divide 98 by 280 or 98/280, to get 0.35.

To get the percentage of seats filled, you must multiply the decimal you get by 100.

So it should look like this and your result should be 35%.

[tex]\frac{98}{280} = 0.35 *100=35[/tex]%

Answer:

vertex is: (4,-9)

y intercept= (0,7)

roots= (1,0) and (7,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

so we can use factoring to solve this quadratic equation real quick:

x^2-7x-1x+7

x(x-7)

-1(x-7)

(x-1)(x-7)=0

x-1=0

x=1

x-7=0

x=7

(1,0) and (7,0) are the roots

axis of symmetry: 8/2=4

substitute axsis of symmetry in equation to get vertex:

4^2-8(4)+7

16-32+7

-16+7=-9

vertex is: (4,-9)

y intercept= (0,7)

roots= (1,0) and (7,0)

Hope this helps

Answer:

all the phones produced during the day in question.

Step-by-step explanation:

Okay, we are given the following data or information or parameters in the question above and they are; 2 % of the phones produced per day are defective, the quality of a day's production was checked by sampling 50 samples randomly.

Therefore, the best option or Explanation that best Define the population of interest to the manufacturer is; ''all the phones produced during the day in question''.

Also, the 50 phones that are sampled randomly and 2% which are defective is a condition that the manufacturer should be interested in.

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

the numbers greater than nine are: 10,11,12

1,3,5,7,9

So that is nine numbers

9/12 can be simplified to 3/4 if you divide by 3

if you like my answer please give me the brainliest. I'm trying to boost my rank and I'm really close

Answer: C electricity

Step-by-step explanation:

It is

Answer:

~ 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real life ~

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us plan out our steps, and solve for each:

1. Given the information, let us create a proportionality as such:

      48       =           1      ⇒   x - centimeters of the snowflake in real life

       18                    x

2. Now let us cross multiply, and solve through simple algebra for x:

48 * x = 18,

x = 0.375 centimeters of the snowflake in real ife

Answer:

The answer is the garbage truck had 6 wheels

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the semitruck has 18 wheels and the semitruck had 3 times more wheels than a garbage truck all you would have to do is divide 18 by 3 and you will get 6 as your answer.

Hope this helps, its my first time answering.

Answer:

True? What are you asking

Step-by-step explanation:

But yes triangles are congruent by either of those

Answer:

you're not really asking anything, or is this a true/false statement

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

13

Step-by-step explanation:

It should just be 104 divided by 8 which equals=13

Answer:

5%

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the tax, we take the price times the tax rate

2 = 40* rate

Divide each side by 40

2/40 =rate

.05 = rate

Changing to percent form

5% = rate

Answer:

tax rate = 2 / 40  = 1 /20 = 0.05 *100 = 5%

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

43.96

Step-by-step explanation:

ok so you use the formula: A= 3.14•r•2 next you plug in your values a=3.14•7•2 3.14•7= 28.98•2=43.96

Answer:

43.96

im dying on the question before that one it says "What issues are you having when it comes to area and circumference" you typed nothing really and here you are asking us whats the circles area lol

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3/8

Step-by-step explanation:

add 5+1+3=9

and there is 3 cheese pizza so its 3 over 8.

Answer:

3/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Jumbo burger with fried is 75%

chicken with salad is 65%

Step-by-step explanation:

you first split the burger and sides. You add up the sides to find the salad. Then add up the sides and burgers

Answer:

What is the probability that he order a Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries or a Chicken Sandwich with a Salad? Make an area or tree diagram to help with the problem.

Answer to question: 20% for Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries and 10.5% for Chicken Sandwich with a Salad.

Step-by-step explanation:

You are going to find the probability that he order a Jumbo Burger with Regular Fries or a Chicken Sandwhich with a Salad by using a area model or a tree diagram. Although you ddin't ask me to solve it, I'm gonna help you with it anyways.

Sandwhiches:

50% - Jumbo Burger (JB)

30% - Chicken Sandwich (CS)

20% - Regular Burger (RB)

Sides:

40% - Curly Fries (CF)

35% - Salad (S)

25% - Regular Fries (RF)

Acronyms

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Curly Fries (CF) = JBCF

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Salad (S) = JBS

Jumbo Burger (JB) + Regular Fries (RF) = JBRF

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Curly Fries (CF) = CSCF

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Salad (S) = CSS

Chicken Sandwich (CS) + Regular Fries (RF) = CSRF

Regular Burger (RB) + Curly Fries (CF) = RBCF

Regular Burger (RB) + Salad (S) = RBS

Regular Burger (RB) + Regular Fries (RF) = RBRF

Probability of combinations:

JBCF = 0.5 x 0.4 = 0.20

JBS = 0.5 x 0.35 = 17.5

JBRF = 0.5 x 0.25 = 12.5

CSCF = 0.3 x 0.4 = 12

CSS = 0.3 x 0.35 = 10.5

CSRF = 0.3 x 0.25 = 7.5

RBCF = 0.2 x 0.4 = 8

RBS = 0.2 x 0.35 = 7

RBRF = 0.2 x 0.25 = 5

Your tree diagram should look something like this:

         CF(40%)- outcome - JBCF (20%)

          /  

(50%)JB ---  S(35%)-  outcome - JBS (17.5%)

           \            

           RF(25%)-  outcome - JBRF (12.5%)

         CF(40%)- outcome - CSCF (12%)

          /

(30%)CS ---  S(35%)- outcome - CSS (10.5%)

            \

            RF(25%)- outcome - CSRF (7.5%)

           CF(40%)- outcome - RBCF (8%)

           /

(20%)RB ---  S(35%)- outcome - RBS (7%)

          \

          RF(25%)- outcome - RBRF (5%)

Hope this helps because this took forever :D

Answer:

The value increases

Step-by-step explanation:

the smaller the divisor, the larger the quotient.

Answer:

100

Step-by-step explanation:

(b/2)^2

b= -20

(-20/2)^2

(-10)^2

100

Answer:B. The regression line​ changes, but the change is small. C. There is no regression line for the second case because the data are in a pattern. D. The regression line is very similar in both cases.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

B. 2 * log (9)

Step-by-step explanation:

I put them both into my calculator and got the same answer both times.

The expression that is equivalent to log(9^2) is 2log89. Option B is correct.

According to the law of logarithm,

log (a^b) = blog a

Note that the power of the function is taken to the back of the logarithmic function.

Given the log function log(9^2), to get the equivalent expression, we will simply take the power which is 2 to the back of the log function to have 2log9

Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/23882267

answer would be A because it u factor it out you will get your initial equation

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The question says,

A roulette wheel has 38 slots, of which 18 are black, 18 are red,and 2 are green. When the wheel is spun, the ball is equally likely to come to rest in any of the slots. One of the simplest wagers chooses red or black. A bet of $1 on red returns $2 if the ball lands in a red slot. Otherwise, the player loses his dollar. When gamblers bet on red or black, the two green slots belong to the house. Because the probability of winning $2 is 18/38, the mean payoff from a $1 bet is twice 18/38, or 94.7 cents. Explain what the law of large numbers tells us about what will happen if a gambler makes very many betson red.

The law of large numbers tells us that as the gambler makes many bets, they will have an average payoff of which is equivalent to 0.947.

Therefore, if the gambler makes n bets of $1, and as the n grows/increase large, they will have only $0.947*n out of the original $n.

That is as n increases the gamblers will get $0.947 in n places

More generally, as the gambler makes a large number of bets on red, they will lose money.

Answer:

[2,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

[0,1), [0,1),[0,1),[0,1)

[1,2), [1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2),[1,2)

[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3),[2,3)

[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4),[3,4)

Step-by-step explanation:

C

Answer:

The answer is C

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the test and got it right :)

hopefully this helps you :)

pls mark brainlest ;)

Answer:

7cm²

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y = 3x-6

Step-by-step explanation:

y = 3x−5

This is in slope intercept form

y = mx+b where m is the slope and b is the y intercept

m =3

Parallel lines have the same slope

We have the slope m=3 and a point (2,0)

y = mx+b

y = 3x+b

Substituting the point into the equation to solve for b

0 = 3(2)+b

0 = 6+b

b = -6

y = 3x-6

Answer:

y = 3x - 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Parallel lines have the same slope,

So m = 3

y - 0 = 3(x - 2)

y = 3x - 6

Answer:

The mean will increase, after the outlier is removed.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

its m<2=degrees

Answer:

m∠1 = 131

m∠2 = 49

m∠2 = 112

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a) Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu \leq 120[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu > 120[/tex]  

b) [tex]t=\frac{130-120}{\frac{40}{\sqrt{80}}}=2.236[/tex]  

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex] df = n-1 = 80-1=79[/tex]

The p value for this case taking in count the alternative hypothesis would be:

[tex]p_v =P(t_{79}>2.236)=0.0141[/tex]  

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

[tex]\bar X=130[/tex] represent the sample mean for the amount spent each shopper

[tex]s=40[/tex] represent the sample standard deviation

[tex]n=80[/tex] sample size  

[tex]\mu_o =120[/tex] represent the value to verify

t would represent the statistic    

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value f

Part a

We want to verify if the shoppers participating in the loyalty program spent more on average than typical shoppers, the system of hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]\mu \leq 120[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]\mu > 120[/tex]  

The statistic for this case would be given by:

[tex]t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

[tex]t=\frac{130-120}{\frac{40}{\sqrt{80}}}=2.236[/tex]  

The degrees of freedom are given by:

[tex] df = n-1 = 80-1=79[/tex]

The p value for this case taking in count the alternative hypothesis would be:

[tex]p_v =P(t_{79}>2.236)=0.0141[/tex]  

Answer:

3218.75 a month

Step-by-step explanation: