Been stuck on this since yesterday !!?!?

Answer:

5765865876+5737555586=11503421462

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]we \ add \ \ only \ \ units \ we \ do \ not \ need \ the \ rest \\\\ \bf (3\underline 1 + 13\underline2 + 14\underline3 + 41\underline4 + 51\underline5 +15\underline6 + 6\underline1)= \\\\ 1+2+3+4+5+6+1=2\underline 2 \\\\ Answer: C) \ 2[/tex]

We can seperate (3b³) into two different parts, the constant and the variable.

The constant (3) and the variable (b) can both be squared and multiplied to get the correct answer, so:

3² = 9

(b³)² = [tex]b^{6}[/tex]

So, [tex](3b^{3})^{2} = 9b^{6}[/tex]

Answer:

Cos C = a/h

= 21/35

Step-by-step explanation:

since cos is equal to adjacent angle over hypotenuse angle, so from the question we conclude Cos C = 21/35

Answer:

12 floors

Step-by-step explanation:

768 ÷ 64 = 12.

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

768 divided by 64 =12

Answer:

????

Step-by-step explanation:

as in y = 4.95 + 3.99 or points? if so just draw a horizontal line at 8.94

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The Collatz Conjecture is one of the most intreging of all the possible simple statements in mathematics.

Simply put it says

Try 5

Try another one -- 15. On the 16th move it goes from 4 to 2 to 1 and then keeps on repeating those 3 digits.

Answer:

A)

[tex]k=0[/tex]

B)

[tex]\displaystyle \begin{aligned} 2k + 1& = 2\ln 20 + 1 \\ &\approx 2.3863\end{aligned}[/tex]

C)

[tex]\displaystyle \begin{aligned} k - 3&= \ln \frac{1}{2} - 3 \\ &\approx-3.6931 \end{aligned}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the function:

[tex]\displaystyle h(x) = 20e^{kx} \text{ where } k \in \mathbb{R}[/tex]

A)

Given that h(1) = 20, we want to find k.

h(1) = 20 means that h(x) = 20 when x = 1. Substitute:

[tex]\displaystyle (20) = 20e^{k(1)}[/tex]

Simplify:

[tex]1= e^k[/tex]

Anything raised to zero (except for zero) is one. Therefore:

[tex]k=0[/tex]

B)

Given that h(1) = 40, we want to find 2k + 1.

Likewise, this means that h(x) = 40 when x = 1. Substitute:

[tex]\displaystyle (40) = 20e^{k(1)}[/tex]

Simplify:

[tex]\displaystyle 2 = e^{k}[/tex]

We can take the natural log of both sides:

[tex]\displaystyle \ln 2 = \underbrace{k\ln e}_{\ln a^b = b\ln a}[/tex]

By definition, ln(e) = 1. Hence:

[tex]\displaystyle k = \ln 2[/tex]

Therefore:

[tex]2k+1 = 2\ln 2+ 1 \approx 2.3863[/tex]

C)

Given that h(1) = 10, we want to find k - 3.

Again, this meas that h(x) = 10 when x = 1. Substitute:

[tex]\displaystyle (10) = 20e^{k(1)}[/tex]

Simplfy:

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{1}{2} = e^k[/tex]

Take the natural log of both sides:

[tex]\displaystyle \ln \frac{1}{2} = k\ln e[/tex]

Therefore:

[tex]\displaystyle k = \ln \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Therefore:

[tex]\displaystyle k - 3 = \ln\frac{1}{2} - 3\approx-3.6931[/tex]

Answer:

The probability tree is;

                            0.95        [tex](+)[/tex]

                   [tex](S)[/tex]

          0.1              0.05        [tex](-)[/tex]

[  P  ]

          0.9             0.15          [tex](+)[/tex]                                                        

                  [tex](S_{no})[/tex]    

                             0.85         [tex](-)[/tex]        

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data in the question;

10% of the rugby team members use steroids

so Probability of using steroid; P( use steroid ) = 10% = 0.10

Probability of not using steroid; P( no steroid use ) = 1 - 0.10 = 0.90

Since the test show positive for an athlete who uses steroids, 95% of the time.

Probability of using steroids and testing positive = 95% = 0.95

Probability of using steroids and testing Negative = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05

Also from the test, 15% of all steroid-free individuals also test positive.

so

Probability of not using steroids and testing positive = 15% = 0.15

Probability of not using steroids and testing negative = 1 - 0.15 = 0.85

To set up the probability tree, Let;

[tex](S)[/tex] represent steroid use

[tex](S_{no})[/tex] represent no steroid use

[tex](+)[/tex] represent test positive

[tex](-)[/tex] represent test negative

so we have;

                            0.95        [tex](+)[/tex]

                   [tex](S)[/tex]

          0.1              0.05        [tex](-)[/tex]

[  P  ]

          0.9             0.15          [tex](+)[/tex]                                                        

                  [tex](S_{no})[/tex]    

                             0.85         [tex](-)[/tex]        

answer is 6

Step-by-step explanation:

3x+11=y

y=29

3x+11=29

3x=29-11

3x=18

x=18÷3

x=6

Answer:6

Step-by-step explanation:

3x+11=29

3x=29-11

3x=18

X=18/3

X=6

Consecutive terms in this sequence are separated by a constant c, so if the 4th term is 15, then the next terms would be

5th: 15 + c

6th: (15 + c) + c = 15 + 2c

7th: (15 + 2c) + c = 15 + 3c

and so on. More generally, since any given number in the sequence depends on the number that came before it, we can write the n-th term in terms of the 4th term,

n-th: 15 + (n - 4) c

Then the 9th term in the sequence is

15 + (9 - 4) c = 35

and solving for c gives

15 + 5c = 35   ==>   5c = 20   ==>   c = 4

Then the 15th term would be

15 + (15 - 4)×4 = 15 + 11×4 = 15 + 44 = 59

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a₁ = 15

a₂/a₁ = 45/15 = 3

a₃/a₂ = 135/45 = 3

...

It is a geometric sequence with a common ratio r=3.

Sum of first 12 terms = a₁·(1-r¹²)/(1-r)

= 15·(1-3¹²)/(1-3)

= 15·(-531,441)/(-2)

= 3,985,800

Answer:

682

Step-by-step explanation:

191,919 + 262,626

454545 ÷ 666 = 682.5

Thus meaning 682 bags will have 666 berries and one bag will have 333 berries.

Answers:

[tex]\text{Perimeter} = 14\sqrt{5}\\\\\text{Area} = 50\\\\[/tex]

=======================================================

Work Shown:

[tex]L = 2\sqrt{5} = \text{length}[/tex]

[tex]W = 5\sqrt{5} = \text{width}[/tex]

P = perimeter

[tex]P = 2*(L+W)\\\\P = 2*(2\sqrt{5}+5\sqrt{5})\\\\P = 2*(7\sqrt{5})\\\\P = 14\sqrt{5}\\\\[/tex]

-------------

A = area

[tex]A = L*W\\\\A = (2\sqrt{5})*(5\sqrt{5})\\\\A = (2*5)(\sqrt{5}*\sqrt{5})\\\\A = 10\sqrt{5*5}\\\\A = 10\sqrt{25}\\\\A = 10*5\\\\A = 50\\\\[/tex]

Answer:

A, B, and E.

Step-by-step explanation:

A. 5^x * 5^x

= 5^x+x

=5^(2)(x)

=25^x

B. 5^2x

=5^(2)(x)

=25^x

C. 5*5^2x

=5^1+2x

D. 5*5^x

=5^1+x

E. (5*5)^x

=5^x*5^x

=5^(2)(x)

=25^x

F. 5^2*5^x

=5^2+x

Answer:

Short leg = x

Longer leg = 12

Hypotenuse = y

Short leg = 4√3

longer leg = 12

Hypotenuse = 8√3

Answered by GAUTHMATH

Answer:

vertical asymptotes

x=6, x=-6

horizontal asymptotes

y=0

zeros (0,0)

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = 6x / ( x^2 - 36)

First factor

f(x) = 6x / ( x-6)(x+6)

Since nothing cancels

The vertical asymptotes are when the denominator goes to zero

x-6 = 0   x+6=0

x=6          x= -6

Since the numerator has a smaller power than the denominator (1 < 2), there is an asymptote at y = 0

To find the zeros, we find where the numerator = 0

6x=0

x=0

[tex]\\ \rm\Rrightarrow y=\dfrac{6x}{x^2-36}[/tex]

The h orizontal asymptote

As x has less degree than x²

Vertical asymptote

Answer:

0 ≤ d ≤ 20

Step-by-step explanation:

You mention that Manatees can swim in water up to 20 feet deep. So, this means that the largest depth that he can swim is 20 feet, not more than this. Also, keep in mind that the depth can't be negative, so ----> 0 ≤ d ≤ 20 feet

We want to write an expression (an inequality actually) that defines the depth at which a manatee can swim. The inequality is: 0ft ≤ d ≤ 20ft.

We know that the manatees can swim in water up to 20 feet deep. This represents the maximum deep at which manatees can swim, the minimum is trivial, it would be 0ft (when the manatees are on the surface of the water).

Then we can write the inequality:

0ft ≤ d ≤ 20ft.

This gives the range of possible values of d, depth at which the manatee can swim.

If you want to learn more, you can read:

https://brainly.com/question/17675534

Answer: I think the answer is A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

? = 13.6

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the unknown angle be y

so

tan y= p/b

tan y =8/33

y = tan‐¹(8/33)

y = 13.62699486

y = 13.6

The final amount is $7,615.27

A = P(1 + r/n)^t

Where,

A = Final amount

P = principal = $7, 200

r = interest rate = 2.5% = 0.025

n = number of periods = 4

t = time = 9 years

A = P(1 + r/n)^t

= 7,200(1 + 0.025/4)^9

= 7,200(1 + 0.00625)^9

= 7,200(1.00625)^9

= 7,200(1.0576769512798)

= 7,615.2740492152

Approximately,

A = $7,615.27

https://brainly.com/question/14003110

Leontief input output model (technology matrix) is an economic model that shows the quantitative relationship and sectorial interdependency in a national economy

The responses with  regards to the question are;

(i) The technology matrix for the economy is presented as follows;

[tex]\mathbf{ A} =\left[\begin{array}{ccc}Agric&&Textile\\0.4&&0.1\\&&\\0.1&&0.2\end{array}\right] \begin{array}{ccc}\mathbf{Per \ Unit}\\Agriculture\\\\Textile\end{array}\right][/tex]

(ii) The required gross production of each industry to meet the desired surplus are;

50 units of agriculture and 250 units of textile

The reason the above values are correct is as follows:

(i) The given parameters are;

The industries in the economy = Agricultural industry and textile industry

Units of agricultural input required per unit of agricultural output = 0.4

Units of textile input required per unit of agricultural output = 0.1

Units of agricultural input required per unit of textile output = 0.1

Units of textile input required per unit of textile output = 0.2

Let X represent agriculture, and let Y represent textile, we have;

[tex]Agric \ for \ agric = \dfrac{0.4 \ units \ of \ agriculture}{1\ unit \ of \ agric \ produced} \times X \ Agric \ produced= 0.4 \cdot X[/tex]

[tex]Agric \ for \ textile = \dfrac{0.1 \ units \ of \ agriculture}{1\ unit \ of \ textile \ produced} \times Y \ textile \ produced= 0.1 \cdot Y[/tex]

We also have;

Textile for agriculture = 0.1·X

Textile for textile = 0.2·Y

Therefore;

X = 0.4·X + 0.1·Y

Y = 0.1·X + 0.2·Y

Therefore;

The technology matrix for the economy is presented as follows;

[tex]\mathbf{Technology \ matrix, A} =\left[\begin{array}{ccc}Agric&&Textile\\0.4&&0.1\\&&\\0.1&&0.2\end{array}\right] \begin{array}{ccc}\mathbf{Per \ Unit}\\Agriculture\\\\Textile\end{array}\right][/tex]

(ii)  Let P represent the production vector, and let d represent the demand vector, we have;

[tex]P = \left[\begin{array}{c}X \\Y\end{array}\right][/tex], [tex]d = \left[\begin{array}{c}5 \\195\end{array}\right][/tex]

P = A·P + d

∴ P - A·P = d

Therefore;

[tex]P = \mathbf{ \dfrac{d}{(I - A)}}[/tex]

Where I = The 2 by 2 identity matrix

We get;

[tex]I - A =\left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&&0\\&&\\0&&1\end{array}\right] - \left[\begin{array}{ccc}0.4&&0.1\\&&\\0.1&&0.2\end{array}\right] = \mathbf{\left[\begin{array}{ccc}0.6&&-0.1\\&&\\-0.1&&0.8\end{array}\right]}[/tex]

With the use of a graphing calculator, we have;

[tex]P =\left[\begin{array}{c}X \\Y\end{array}\right] = \dfrac{\left[\begin{array}{c}5 \\195\end{array}\right]}{\left[\begin{array}{ccc}0.6&&-0.1\\&&\\-0.1&&0.8\end{array}\right]} = \left[\begin{array}{ccc}50\\\\\ 250\end{array}\right][/tex]

The required gross product of agriculture, X = 50 units

The required gross product of textile, Y = 250 units

Learn more about the Leontief input output model here:

https://brainly.com/question/15417573

We have that he technology matrix for this economy and the  the gross production of each industry are

a)    [tex]X= \begin{vmatrix}0.4 & 0.1 \\0.1 & 0.2\end{vmatrix}[/tex]

b)    [tex]\begin{vmatrix}A\\T\end{vmatrix}=\begin{vmatrix}50\\250\end{vmatrix}[/tex]          

From the Question we have told that

Each unit of agricultural output requires 0.4 unit of agricultural input

Each unit of agricultural output requires 0.1 unit of textiles input.

Each unit of textiles output requires 0.1 unit of agricultural input

Each unit of textiles output requires 0.2 unit of textiles input.

Generally the technology matrix for this economy is given below

With

X =Agricultural industry Gross output

Y= Textile industry Gross Output

Therefore

[tex]X= \begin{vmatrix}0.4 & 0.1 \\0.1 & 0.2\end{vmatrix}[/tex]

b)

From the Question we are told that

Surpluses of 5 units of agricultural products and 195 units of textiles are desired.

Therefore, we have Desired surplus matrix of

[tex]D= \begin{vmatrix}5\\195\end{vmatrix}[/tex]

Generally the Technology equation is mathematically given as

[tex](I-X)\phi=D[/tex]

Where

X =Agricultural industry Gross output

I=A Unit matrix

\phi=Matrix of gross production

Therefore

[tex]\begin{vmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & 1\end{vmatrix}-(\begin{vmatrix}0.4 & 0.1 \\0.1 & 0.2\end{vmatrix}))\begin{vmatrix}A\\T\end{vmatrix}=\begin{vmatrix}5\\195\end{vmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]\begin{vmatrix}A\\T\end{vmatrix}=\begin{vmatrix}50\\250\end{vmatrix}[/tex]

In conclusion

The technology matrix for this economy and the  the gross production of each industry are

[tex]X= \begin{vmatrix}0.4 & 0.1 \\0.1 & 0.2\end{vmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]\begin{vmatrix}A\\T\end{vmatrix}=\begin{vmatrix}50\\250\end{vmatrix}[/tex]         Respectively

In conclusion

https://brainly.com/question/16863924

Answer:

Rugby lawyer

Step-by-step explanation:

Aaron is a partner in the firm’s dispute resolution division. He advises clients on a range of litigious and risk related matters, with particular expertise in the areas of corporate misconduct, white collar criminal and regulatory affairs, sports law and employment law.  Aaron leads our sports law practice, and is a member of the firm’s health and safety, public law, and organisational integrity teams.

Well regarded by clients for his ability to analyse and strategise complex situations, Aaron is internationally recognised for his ability to implement pragmatic and commercial strategies to minimise risk and create opportunity. This ability has resulted in clients avoiding significant litigation and commercial consequences.

Aaron is an experienced advocate, having argued cases in the District Court, High Court, Employment Court, the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of New Zealand, along with numerous tribunals.

He is recognised by international legal directories including by Chambers & Partners (Asia Pacific), Who’s Who Legal, Expert Guides, Best Lawyers and Doyles.

Before joining MinterEllisonRuddWatts Aaron practiced as a barrister with Paul Davison QC, and has lectured at the University of Auckland.

first we shall learn the rules.when numbers with same sign are divided it gives pisitive sign but, when numbers of different signs are divided it gives negetive sign.

here,

7. (-154) ➗ (-14) =11

11. (-40) ➗10=-4

15. 90 ➗ (-15)=-6

16. 108 ➗ (-9)=-12

17. (-48) ➗ (-6)=8

18. (-105) ➗ 7=-15

hope it helps you......

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6'2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

210 miles in 1 hour

Step-by-step explanation:

steps are in picture