Below is the justification for the formula for area of a circle. Which word, when placed in the blank, best completes this argument?

Answer:

17 : 27

Step-by-step explanation:

x=3

y=5

4(3)+5 : 6(5)-3

= 12+5 : 30-3

= 17 : 27

Answer:

I  think its B

Step-by-step explanation:

The pairs of functions which are inverses of each other is A. f(x) = 2x - 9 and g(x) = (x + 9)/2.

Inverse functions are functions which can be reversed in to another function.

Then the function is said to be the inverse of the second function.

If two functions f(x) and g(x) are inverses of each other, then f(g(x) = x and g(f(x)) = x.

A. f(x) = 2x - 9 and g(x) = (x + 9)/2

f(g(x)) = f((x + 9)/2) = 2 [(x + 9)/2] - 9 = x + 9 - 9 = x

g(f(x)) = g(2x - 9) = (2x - 9 + 9) / 2 = 2x / 2 = x

So, the functions are inverses of each other.

B. f(x) = (x/3) + 4 and g(x) = 3x - 4

f(g(x)) = f(3x - 4) = [(3x - 4)/3] + 4 ≠ x

So not inverses of each other.

C. f(x) = 5 + ∛x and g(x) = 5 - x³

f(g(x)) = f(5 - x³) = 5 + ∛(5 - x³) ≠ x

So not inverses of each other.

D. f(x) = (2/x) - 6 and g(x) = (x + 6)/2

f(g(x)) = f((x + 6)/2) = [2 / ((x + 6)/2)] - 6 ≠ x

So not inverses of each other.

Hence the correct option is A.

Learn more about Inverse functions here :

https://brainly.com/question/2541698

#SPJ7

:Answer:

1.) The majority of drivers, about 62 percent, plan to buy a used vehicle next.

3.) Ten percent of drivers lease their current vehicle.

5.) The least percentage of people will lease their next car.

Correct on EDGE2021

Answer:

A)The majority of drivers, about 62 percent, plan to buy a used vehicle next.

C)Ten percent of drivers lease their current vehicle.

E)The least percentage of people will lease their next car.

Step-by-step explanation:

edge 2023

Answer:

At the beginning, there were 2,678.26 grams of sugar in the container.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since Lisa used 880g of a container of sugar to bake a cake and 1/10 of the creaming sugar to make cookies, and she then had 3/7 of the container of sugar left, to determine how much sugar was in the container at first, the following calculation must be performed:

880 + 1 / 10X = 3 / 7X

880 + 0.1X = 0.4285X

880 = 0.4285X - 0.1X

880 = 0.3285X

880 / 0.3285 = X

2,678.26 = X

Therefore, at the beginning there were 2,678.26 grams of sugar in the container.

Answer:

0.0287 = 2.87% probability the total of the 100 claims exceeds 1,530,000.

Step-by-step explanation:

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

n instances of a normal variable:

For n instances of a normal variable, the mean is [tex]n\mu[/tex] and the standard deviation is [tex]s = \sigma\sqrt{n}[/tex]

Sum of normal variables:

When two normal variables are added, the mean is the sum of the means, while the standard deviation is the square root of the sum of the variances.

Group A follow a normal distribution with mean 10,000 and standard deviation 1,000. 50 claims of group A.

This means that:

[tex]\mu_A = 10000*50 = 500000[/tex]

[tex]s_A = 1000\sqrt{50} = 7071[/tex]

Group B follow a normal distribution with mean 20,000 and standard deviation 2,000. 50 claims of group B.

This means that:

[tex]\mu_B = 20000*50 = 1000000[/tex]

[tex]s_B = 2000\sqrt{50} = 14142[/tex]

Distribution of the total of the 100 claims:

[tex]\mu = \mu_A + \mu_B = 500000 + 1000000 = 1500000[/tex]

[tex]s = \sqrt{s_A^2+s_B^2} = \sqrt{7071^2+14142^2} = 15811[/tex]

Find the probability the total of the 100 claims exceeds 1,530,000.

This is 1 subtracted by the p-value of Z when X = 1530000. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{1530000 - 1500000}{15811}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.9[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.9[/tex] has a p-value of 0.9713

1 - 0.9713 = 0.0287

0.0287 = 2.87% probability the total of the 100 claims exceeds 1,530,000.

Answer:

[tex]|F'H'| = 2 * |FH|[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]E = (0,1)[/tex]             [tex]E' = (-1,2)[/tex]

[tex]F = (1,1)[/tex]             [tex]F' = (1,2)[/tex]

[tex]G = (2,0)[/tex]             [tex]G' =(3,0)[/tex]

[tex]H = (0,0)[/tex]            [tex]H' = (-1,0)[/tex]

[tex](x,y) = (1,0)[/tex] -- center

[tex]k = 2[/tex] --- scale factor

See comment for proper format of question

Required

Compare FH to F'H'

From the question, we understand that the scale of dilation from EFGH to E'F'G'H is 2;

Irrespective of the center of dilation, the distance between corresponding segment will maintain the scale of dilation.

i.e.

[tex]|F'H'| = k * |FH|[/tex]

[tex]|F'H'| = 2 * |FH|[/tex]

To prove this;

Calculate distance of segments FH and F'H' using:

[tex]d = \sqrt{(x_1 - x_2)^2 + (y_1 - y_2)^2}[/tex]

Given that:

[tex]F = (1,1)[/tex]             [tex]F' = (1,2)[/tex]

[tex]H = (0,0)[/tex]            [tex]H' = (-1,0)[/tex]

We have:

[tex]FH = \sqrt{(1- 0)^2 + (1- 0)^2}[/tex]

[tex]FH = \sqrt{(1)^2 + (1)^2}[/tex]

[tex]FH = \sqrt{1 + 1}[/tex]

[tex]FH = \sqrt{2}[/tex]

Similarly;

[tex]F'H' = \sqrt{(1 --1)^2 + (2 -0)^2}[/tex]

[tex]F'H' = \sqrt{(2)^2 + (2)^2}[/tex]

Distribute

[tex]F'H' = \sqrt{(2)^2(1 +1)}[/tex]

[tex]F'H' = \sqrt{(2)^2*2}[/tex]

Split

[tex]F'H' = \sqrt{(2)^2} *\sqrt{2}[/tex]

[tex]F'H' = 2 *\sqrt{2}[/tex]

[tex]F'H' = 2\sqrt{2}[/tex]

Recall that:

[tex]|F'H'| = 2 * |FH|[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]2\sqrt 2 = 2 * \sqrt 2[/tex]

[tex]2\sqrt 2 = 2\sqrt 2[/tex] --- true

Hence, the dilation relationship between FH and F'H' is::

[tex]|F'H'| = 2 * |FH|[/tex]

Answer:NOTT !!  A segment in the image has the same length as its corresponding segment in the pre-image.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]f(-1)=7[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

I am going to assume your question meant the equation

[tex]f(x)=2x^{2} -4x+1[/tex]

So [tex]f(-1)[/tex] can be found by substituting all the x terms in the equation with -1

[tex]f(-1)=2(-1)^{2} -4(-1)+1[/tex]

And simplifying for our answer

[tex]f(-1)=2(1)+4+1[/tex]

[tex]f(-1) = 2+4+1[/tex]

[tex]f(-1)=7[/tex]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  (-3, 3)

Step-by-step explanation:

The blanks are trying to lead you through the process of finding the point of interest.

__

The horizontal distance from T to S is 9 . (or -9, if you prefer)

The ratio you're trying to divide the line into is the ratio that goes in this blank:

Multiply the horizontal distance by 2/3 . (9×2/3 = 6)

Move 6 units left from point T.

The vertical distance from T to S is 6 .

Multiply the vertical distance by 2/3 . (6×2/3 = 4)

Move 4 units up from point T.

__

Point T is (3, -1) so 6 left and 4 up is (3, -1) +(-6, 4) = (3-6, -1+4) = (-3, 3). The point that is 2/3 of the way from T to S is (-3, 3).

Answer:

x is smaller than 5.6 and greater than 0

Answer:

The correct answer is "76.98%".

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the question,

⇒ [tex]P(34000<x<46000) = P[\frac{34000-40000}{5000} <\frac{x- \mu}{\sigma} <\frac{46000-40000}{5000} ][/tex]

                                       [tex]=P(-1.2<z<1.2)[/tex]

                                       [tex]=P(z<1.2)-P(z<-1.2)[/tex]

                                       [tex]=0.8849-0.1151[/tex]

                                       [tex]=0.7698[/tex]

or,

                                       [tex]=76.98[/tex]%

Answer:

a.

Step-by-step explanation:

y = 2/3 x + 7

3 * y = 3 * (2/3 x + 7)

3y = 2x + 21

2x - 3y = -21

-2x + 3y = 21

Answer: a.

Answer:

d

Step-by-step explanation:

75 per week,

after 13 weeks, 75*13 = 975

Hi there!  

»»————-　★　————-««

I believe your answer is:  

"Isolate the variable  using inverse operations."

»»————-　★　————-««  

Here’s why:

To solve for a variable, we would have to isolate it on one side.

To isolate it, we would use inverse operations on both sides on the equation until the variable is isolated.

There are no like terms in the given equation.

⸻⸻⸻⸻

[tex]\boxed{\text{Solving for 'z'...}}\\\\\frac{z}{6} = 36\\-------------\\\rightarrow (\frac{z}{6})6 = (36)6\\\\\rightarrow \boxed{z = 216}[/tex]

⸻⸻⸻⸻

»»————-　★　————-««  

Hope this helps you. I apologize if it’s incorrect.  

Answer:

First option: Isolate the variable using inverse operations

Step-by-step explanation:

z/6 = 36

Since we already have the equation set up and cannot simplify any further, we must try to isolate the variable, z, by using inverse operations.

The inverse operation of division is multiplication, so to isolate z, we multiply 6 on each side:

z/6 · 6 = 36 · 6

z = 216

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4

Step-by-step explanation:

233

Answer:

3 pages per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

Take the number of pages and divide by the time

1 1/2 ÷ 1/2

Write the mixed number as an improper fraction

3/2÷1/2

Copy dot flip

3/2 * 2/1

3

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  3 pages per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the number of pages per hour, divide pages by hours.

  (1.5 pages)/(0.5 hours) = 3 pages/hour

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

I see you're in college math, so we'll solve this with calculus, since it's the easiest way anyway.

The position equation is

[tex]s(t)=-1.86t^2+15t[/tex]  That equation will give us the height of the rock at ANY TIME during its travels. I could find the height at 2 seconds by plugging in a 2 for t; I could find the height at 12 seconds by plugging in a 12 for t, etc.

The first derivative of position is velocity:

v(t) = -3.72t + 15 and you stated that the rock will be at its max height when the velocity is 0, so we plug in a 0 for v(t):

0 = -3.72t + 15 and solve for t:\

-15 = -3.72t so

t = 4.03 seconds. This is how long it takes to get to its max height. Knowing that, we can plug 4.03 seconds into the position equation to find the height at 4.03 seconds:

s(4.03) = -1.86(4.03)² + 15(4.03) so

s(4.03) = 30.2 meters.

Calculus is amazing. Much easier than most methods to solve problems like this.

Answer:

Muhammad lives 8 km away from the school.

Hita lives 4 km away from the school.

Step-by-step explanation:

First of all, find a number that, when you double that number and add both numbers, you will get 12. That number is 4. So double 4 and get 8. Then add both to get 12.

Answer:

No

Step-by-step explanation:

x = -3 is a vertical line at x= -3

Tow points on the line are

(-3,1) and (-3,2)

This means one x value goes to 2 different y values so it is not a function

Answer: No

Step-by-step explanation: The line x = -3 is a vertical or straight up and down line that is parallel to the y-axis. On the vertical line x = -3, when x = -3, y can be 0, 1, 2, -5, or any other number, there are in infinite number of possibilities.

The technical definition of a function is written as "a relation in which each element in the domain is paired with one and only one element in the range."

Answer:

A) ƒ(1) = 1, ƒ(3) = 4, ƒ(6) = 32

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)= 1∕2(2)^x,

Let x = 1

f(1)= 1∕2(2)^1 = 1/2 ( 2) = 1

Let x = 3

f(3)= 1∕2(2)^3 = 1/2 ( 8) = 4

Let x = 1

f(6)= 1∕2(2)^6 = 1/2 ( 64) = 32

Answer:

A) ƒ(1) = 1, ƒ(3) = 4, ƒ(6) = 32

Step-by-step explanation: I took the test

Answer:

108

Step-by-step explanation:

sum is a fancy word for add so 3+9=27 and 27*4=108

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  g(x) = 2(x +2)² +2

  vertex: (-2, 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

It is often easier to write the vertex form if the leading coefficient is factored from the variable terms:

  g(x) = 2(x² +4x) +10

Then the square of half the x-coefficient is added inside parentheses, and an equivalent amount is subtracted outside.

  g(x) = 2(x² +4x +4) +10 -2(4)

  g(x) = 2(x +2)² +2

Comparing to the vertex form, we see the parameters are ...

  a = 2, h = -2, k = 2

The vertex is (h, k) = (-2, 2).

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

i think so..sorry if im wrong

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Are you trying to find a variable expression? the product of 86 means multiplication so 86*n or 86n. Other than that I dont understand the question.

Answer:

[tex]{ \tt{ - 3 + a < - 7}} \\ { \tt{a < - 4}}[/tex]

Answer:

If they win today's game, the probability to win the next game = 2/3  

Therefore the probability that they lose the next game when they win today's game = 1-(2/3) =1/3.

If they lose today's game, the probability to win the next game = 1/2

so, the probability to lose is 1/2.

a)        [tex]\begin{bmatrix} \frac{2}{3}&\frac{1}{2} & \\\\ \frac{1}{3}&\frac{1}{2} & \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

b)       [tex]p=\begin{bmatrix} \frac{1}{2}\\\\ \frac{1}{2} \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

         [tex]p^{'} =\begin{bmatrix} \frac{7}{12}\\\\ \frac{5}{12} \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

c) Let them win today's game

[tex]p=\begin{bmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}\\\\\\p^{'} =\begin{bmatrix} \frac{2}{3}\\\\\frac{1}{3} \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]p^{''}= \left[\begin{array}{c}\frac{11}{18} \\\\\frac{7}{18} \end{array}\right][/tex]

The chances that they win their next game are 58.33%, while if they won today, the chances of winning the game after the next are 38.88%.

Given that if the local professional basketball team, the Sneakers, wins today's game, they have a 2/3 chance of winning their next game, while if they lose this game, they have a 1/2 chance of winning their next game, to determine, if there is a 50-50 chance of the Sneakers winning today's game, what are the chances that they win their next game, and determine, if they won today, what are the chances of winning the game after the next, you must perform the following calculations:

Therefore, the chances that they win their next game are 58.33%, while if they won today, the chances of winning the game after the next are 38.88%.

Learn more about probabilities in https://brainly.com/question/10182808

Answer:

"85%" is the right answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

[tex]\mu = 70[/tex] (%)

[tex]\sigma = 5[/tex] (%)

As we know,

The 99.7% observation fall within the 3rd standard deviation, then

⇒ [tex](\mu \pm \sigma ) = (70-(3\times 5)) \ to \ (70+(3\times 5))[/tex]

                [tex]=(70-15) \ to \ (70+15)[/tex]

                [tex]=55 \ to \ 85[/tex] (%)

Thus the above is the correct solution.