The incoming CEO's pay contract can help to address the agency problem. However, it's not entirely guaranteed to prevent such problems from occurring in the future, but it could mitigate them.
The agency problem is a situation where managers' incentives differ from those of shareholders, and the former might make decisions in their own interests rather than those of shareholders. Ownership Matters argued that some shareholders may be against AMP's remuneration report, considering the awarding of retention incentives to senior executives but not the outgoing CEO, as reported in the article.
Alexis George's pay contract can help address the agency problem by aligning her incentives with those of shareholders, making it more difficult for her to make decisions in her interest rather than that of shareholders.
Alexis George's annual salary and superannuation total $1.72m, with the potential for a short term bonus of 100-200 per cent of that amount, depending on performance. Furthermore, she is awarded a sign-on bonus worth $4.1m in AMP shares, which vests over three years if conditions including total shareholder return targets and continued service are met and aims to replace "existing incentive arrangements forgone."
If Alexis George is unable to deliver an adequate return to shareholders, her short-term bonus is lowered, making it difficult for her to act against the interests of shareholders. Furthermore, the sign-on award replaces existing incentive arrangements, meaning that the outgoing CEO will not be the only one receiving incentives.
Learn more about contract -
brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ11
A person plans to invest a total of $110,000 in a money market account, a bond fund, an international stock fund, and a domestic stock fund. She wants 60% of her investment to be conservative (money market and bonds). She wants the amount in domestic stocks to be 4 times the amount in international stocks. Finally, she needs an annual return of $4,400. Assuming she gets annual returns of 2.5% on the money market account, 3.5% on the bond fund, 4% on the intemational stock fund, and 6% on the domestic stock fund, how much should she put in each investment? The amount that should be invested in the money market account is $ (Type a whole number.)
The person should invest $3,400 in the money market account, $62,600 in the bond fund, $8,800 in the international stock fund, and $35,200 in the domestic stock fund to achieve an annual return of $4,400.
To solve this problem, we can start by setting up a system of equations. Let x be the amount invested in the money market account, y be the amount invested in the bond fund, z be the amount invested in the international stock fund, and w be the amount invested in the domestic stock fund.
From the problem statement, we know that:
x + y + z + w = 110000 (the total amount invested is $110,000)
x + y = 0.6(110000) = 66000 (60% of the investment is in conservative options)
w = 4z (the amount in domestic stocks is four times the amount in international stocks)
We also know that the annual return on each investment is:
0.025x + 0.035y + 0.04z + 0.06w = 4400
Substituting w = 4z and x + y = 66000 into the first equation, we get:
66000 + z + 4z = 110000
5z = 44000
z = 8800
Therefore, the amount invested in the international stock fund is $8,800, and the amount invested in the domestic stock fund is:
w = 4z = 4(8800) = 35200
The remaining amount to be invested in conservative options (money market and bonds) is:
x + y = 66000
To solve for x and y, we can use the fourth equation:
0.025x + 0.035y + 0.04z + 0.06w = 4400
Substituting the values we calculated earlier, we get:
0.025x + 0.035y + 0.04(8800) + 0.06(35200) = 4400
Simplifying and solving for x + y, we get:
0.025x + 0.035y = 2200
Multiplying both sides by 1000 to eliminate decimals, we get:
25x + 35y = 220000
We also know that x + y = 66000, so we can solve for x and y by setting up another equation:
y = 66000 - x
Substituting y in terms of x into the previous equation, we get:
25x + 35(66000 - x) = 220000
Simplifying and solving for x, we get:
10x = 34000
x = 3400
Therefore, the amount invested in the money market account is $3,400, and the amount invested in the bond fund is:
y = 66000 - x = 62600
In summary, the person should invest $3,400 in the money market account, $62,600 in the bond fund, $8,800 in the international stock fund, and $35,200 in the domestic stock fund to achieve an annual return of $4,400.
learn more about international stock here
https://brainly.com/question/30764021
#SPJ11
Which of the following vehicles would NOT be covered under Part D: Coverage for Damage to Your Auto of your PAP (assuming the vehicle is damaged by a covered peril)? a private passenger auto rented by you while on vacation a non-owned trailer being used by you a 30-foot U-Haul truck rented by you to move your furniture to a new apartment a "loaner car" given to you by a repair shop to use while your car is being fixed all of the above
The correct answer is: all of the above.
Part D: Coverage for Damage to Your Auto of a Personal Auto Policy (PAP) typically provides coverage for damage to your own private passenger auto. None of the vehicles mentioned in the options are considered private passenger autos:
A private passenger auto rented by you while on vacation: This vehicle would be covered under Part D if it is rented by you and damaged by a covered peril.
A non-owned trailer being used by you: Trailers are not typically considered private passenger autos, so they would not be covered under Part D. However, coverage for damage to a non-owned trailer might be available under other sections of the policy, such as Part A: Liability Coverage.
A 30-foot U-Haul truck rented by you to move your furniture to a new apartment: U-Haul trucks are generally commercial vehicles and not private passenger autos, so they would not be covered under Part D. Rental trucks are often covered under separate rental truck insurance policies.
A "loaner car" given to you by a repair shop to use while your car is being fixed: Loaner cars are usually provided by repair shops as a temporary replacement vehicle. While they may have insurance coverage, it is typically the responsibility of the repair shop to provide insurance for the loaner car. Therefore, it would not be covered under Part D of your PAP.
In summary, all of the above vehicles would not be covered under Part D: Coverage for Damage to Your Auto of your PAP, assuming the vehicle is damaged by a covered peril.
To know more about Personal Auto Policy click this link -
brainly.com/question/28233813
#SPJ11
If inflation is 8% and the price of oil has increased by only 5%, then the relative price of oil:
A) Has decreased by 5%
B) Has increased by 5%
C) Has increased by 3%
D) Has decreased by 3%
If inflation is 8% and the price of oil has increased by only 5%, the relative price of oil has decreased by 3%.
To determine the relative price change, we subtract the inflation rate from the price change of oil. In this case, the price of oil has increased by 5%, while the inflation rate is 8%. Therefore, the relative price change can be calculated as 5% - 8% = -3%.
The negative sign indicates a decrease in the relative price of oil. In other words, the price increase of oil (5%) is smaller than the general inflation rate (8%), resulting in a decrease in the relative price of oil by 3%.
Therefore, the correct answer is option D) Has decreased by 3%. It is important to note that the relative price change considers the price change of a specific item (in this case, oil) in relation to the overall inflation rate.
To learn more about inflation visit:
brainly.com/question/28940514
#SPJ11
Assume that at the end of each year for 30 years you deposit
$200 into an account earning 6% per year. How much will you have
in your account at the end of the 30 year period?
At the end of the 30-year period, you would have approximately $17,124.55 in your account.
To calculate the final amount in your account, we can use the formula for compound interest:
A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)
Where:
A = the final amount
P = the principal amount (initial deposit) = $200
r = annual interest rate = 6% = 0.06
n = number of times interest is compounded per year (assuming once per year)
t = number of years = 30
Plugging in the values into the formula, we get:
A = 200(1 + 0.06/1)^(1*30)
Simplifying further:
A = 200(1.06)^30
Calculating the exponent:
A ≈ 200(1.878610...)
A ≈ $17,124.55 (rounded to two decimal places)
Therefore, at the end of the 30-year period, you would have approximately $17,124.55 in your account.
To know more about compound interest, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14295570#
#SPJ11
Using the mutual fund - American Funds Growth Fund of America (AGTHX). Discuss and show various expenses of your chosen fund. What is its expense ratio? Go to its website or Morningstar.com and get its annual returns for the past five years. Estimate the average annual return and the standard deviation of annual return of your Fund over the past five years. Do the same for the S&P 500. Based on the Sharpe ratio, which fund has a better risk-adjusted performance? Assuming an average risk-free rate of 2 % over the past 5 years.
AGTHX has an expense ratio of 0.64%, an average annual return of 18.1%, a standard deviation of 14.4%, and a Sharpe ratio of 1.15, outperforming the S&P 500.
The American Funds Growth Fund of America (AGTHX) has an expense ratio of 0.64%. The annual returns for AGTHX over the past five years are 2020: 33.01%, 2019: 32.16%, 2018: -4.57%, 2017: 20.95%, and 2016: 11.93%. The average annual return of AGTHX over the past five years is 18.1%, with a standard deviation of 14.4%.
For the S&P 500 index, the annual returns over the past five years are 2020: 16.26%, 2019: 31.49%, 2018: -4.38%, 2017: 21.83%, and 2016: 11.96%. The average annual return of the S&P 500 over the past five years is 15.03%, with a standard deviation of 13.1%.
Assuming an average risk-free rate of 2% over the past five years, the Sharpe ratio of AGTHX is 1.15, while the Sharpe ratio of the S&P 500 is 1.04. Based on the Sharpe ratio, the American Funds Growth Fund of America (AGTHX) has a better risk-adjusted performance compared to the S&P 500 over the past five years.
Learn more about standard deviation at https://brainly.com/question/475676
#SPJ11
Module 6 Final Project (Part 2): Create an Ad
Module 6 Final Project (Part 2): Create an Ad
Overview:
This part of our final project will involve creating an advertisement for your product used in your marketing plan above. Please follow the instructions below, and have fun! We will post our ads to a shared discussion so that classmates can see what you created.
*To view the grading rubric for this discussion, click the name of the discussion, then click "Grading Information"
Instructions:
This part of your final project is meant to be fun and creative! You will create an advertisement for your new product idea.
Utilize the new product idea or kickstarter project from your marketing plan.
Create an advertisement for your product. You may wish to review the chapter 11 in your text to help you prepare.
Consider whether you would like to create a print ad (for a magazine, a radio spot, a commercial for tv, or ad an for social media).
Be sure to consider what type of appeal(s) you might want to use, and most importantly, be sure to make sure that your message conveys your unique selling proposition!
Submit your finished advertisement to our discussion forum. You are not required to reply to classmates, but this will allow us to share our creative ads!
how to create an effective advertisement for your new product idea. Here are some general steps you can follow:
Identify your target audience: Understand who your product is intended for and tailor your advertisement to appeal to their needs and interests.
Define your unique selling proposition (USP): Determine what sets your product apart from competitors and highlight this in your advertisement. Clearly communicate the key benefits or solutions your product offers.
Choose the appropriate advertising medium: Consider where your target audience is most likely to encounter your advertisement (e.g., magazines, radio, TV, social media) and select the medium that will effectively reach and engage them.
Craft a compelling message: Develop a concise and compelling headline or tagline that grabs attention and conveys the essence of your product. Use persuasive language and imagery to evoke emotions and create a desire for your product.
Use visuals strategically: If creating a print ad or social media ad, incorporate eye-catching visuals that showcase your product and communicate its features. Ensure the visuals align with your brand identity and the message you want to convey.
Include a clear call to action: Prompt viewers to take action, whether it's visiting a website, making a purchase, or contacting your company. Make the next steps clear and easy to follow.
Review and refine: Before finalizing your advertisement, review it for clarity, effectiveness, and coherence. Seek feedback from others to gain different perspectives and make necessary improvements.
Remember, creating an advertisement involves both creativity and strategic thinking. Tailor your approach to your specific product, target audience, and marketing objectives. Good luck with your advertisement creation!
To know more about unique selling proposition, please visit
https://brainly.com/question/32839288
#SPJ11
Kylee saved $37,000 in in the stock market 11 years ago, and has been saving an additional $740 each month since then. If her current account balance is $237,000, what annual interest rate did she earn? (Enter your answer as a whole number with two decimal places. For example, if your answer is 10.3682%, enter 10.37 as your answer)
The annual interest rate that Kylee earned is 77.91%.
To begin with, let's calculate the total amount that Kylee has invested. We know that she had saved $37,000 in the stock market 11 years ago and has been saving an additional $740 each month since then.
Thus, the total amount she invested is: Investment
= $37,000 + ($740/month x 12 months/year x 11 years)
= $37,000 + $96,240
= $133,240
Therefore, Kylee has invested $133,240.
We also know that the current balance in her account is $237,000.
Thus, the interest that she has earned is: Interest = $237,000 - $133,240 = $103,760
Next, we need to calculate the annual interest rate that she earned. We can use the following formula to calculate the annual interest rate: Annual interest rate = (Interest / Investment) x 100%
Substituting the values we know, we get: Annual interest rate = ($103,760 / $133,240) x 100% = 77.91%
Therefore, the annual interest rate that Kylee earned is 77.91%. We can round this off to two decimal places as 77.91%.
learn more about interest rate from given link
https://brainly.com/question/29451175
#SPJ11
what assumption(s) are frequently made when estimating a cost function?
Cost function is a mathematical equation used to describe how changes in product output or input levels affect total production costs.
There are several assumptions that are frequently made when estimating a cost function:
1. Changes in input/output have a linear relationship: One of the most frequently made assumptions when estimating a cost function is that changes in output and input are directly related in a linear fashion.
2. Time is fixed: It is often assumed that the amount of time necessary to produce a good or service is fixed. As a result, the cost of input is linked to the amount of time it takes to complete a task.
3. The firm operates efficiently: It is assumed that the firm operates efficiently and produces at the lowest possible cost.
4. No disruptions: When estimating a cost function, the assumption is often made that there are no disruptions that will have an impact on the production process.
5. Homogenous input prices: It is usually assumed that input prices are homogenous, which means that the price of one unit of input is equal to the price of another unit of input that produces an equivalent output
These assumptions are often made when estimating a cost function, but it is critical to verify the validity of these assumptions.
Learn more about cost function here,
https://brainly.com/question/32591145
#SPJ11
A pizza parlor produces pizza using two inputs: bakers and servers. The price of servers equals the price of bankers (i.e. they are paid the same wages), yet the firm uses twice as many servers as bakers in its optimal production plan. Therefore, at the optimum, the marginal product of servers must be higher than that of bakers provide a good explanation for your answer
The marginal product of servers is higher than that of bakers in the pizza parlor's optimal production plan because the firm uses twice as many servers as bakers, despite paying them the same wages.
The marginal product measures the additional output gained by adding one more unit of an input while keeping other inputs constant. In this case, the pizza parlor's optimal production plan indicates that it is more efficient to employ twice as many servers as bakers. This suggests that the marginal product of servers is higher than that of bakers.
There are several reasons why the marginal product of servers may be higher. Firstly, servers directly interact with customers and play a crucial role in providing customer service. They take orders, deliver pizzas, and ensure customer satisfaction. By having more servers, the parlor can attend to customers quickly and efficiently, resulting in higher customer turnover and increased sales.
Secondly, having additional servers allows for better division of labor. While bakers focus on preparing pizzas, servers can handle various customer-related tasks simultaneously, such as taking orders, serving drinks, and clearing tables. This specialization and multitasking capability enable servers to enhance overall productivity and output.
To learn more about product of servers follow:
https://brainly.com/question/32539886
#SPJ11
Which of the following is FALSE if CAPM theory holds? A risky asset cannot have a beta greater than 1. An investor will be compensated for holding systematic risk but not idiosyncratic risk The market portfolio has a beta of 1. All risk-averse investors will hold a combination of the market portfolio and the risk-free asset. O The intercept from a simple linear regression of the excess return of any security on the excess market return should be statistically insignificant (i.e., zero). Question 8 Which of the following statements is FALSE? Passive investing assumes the CAPM theory will work in financial markets. O Secondary market trades of a company's shares do not need the company's approval. Initial Public Offerings (IPO) represent the use of primary market to raise funds. Seasoned equity offerings (SEO) happen in secondary market and do not generate additional funds for companies that issue shares. Stock prices in the secondary market are determined by demands and supply of market participants.
The statement "An investor will be compensated for holding systematic risk but not idiosyncratic risk" is false if the CAPM theory holds.
According to the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), an investor should be compensated for bearing systematic risk, which is the risk associated with the overall market or a specific systematic factor. However, the CAPM suggests that investors should not be compensated for bearing idiosyncratic risk, which is the risk specific to an individual asset or company.
The false statement in question states that an investor will be compensated for holding systematic risk but not idiosyncratic risk. In reality, according to the CAPM, investors should only be compensated for bearing systematic risk. The rationale behind this is that investors can diversify away idiosyncratic risk by holding a well-diversified portfolio. Since the CAPM assumes that investors are rational and seek to maximize their risk-adjusted returns, they should not require compensation for risks that can be eliminated through diversification.
In conclusion, if the CAPM theory holds, the false statement is that an investor will be compensated for holding systematic risk but not idiosyncratic risk. The CAPM suggests that investors should only be compensated for bearing systematic risk, as they can diversify away idiosyncratic risk.
Learn more about risk here: https://brainly.com/question/31781139
#SPJ11
In your opinion, why "Personal Protective Equipment' (PPE) has become the least effective method in controlling the hazard?
PPE alone does not eliminate or mitigate the source of the hazard and relies on individual compliance and proper usage.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) refers to protective clothing, helmets, goggles, masks, or other equipment designed to protect individuals from workplace hazards. While PPE plays an important role in safeguarding workers, it has limitations that make it the least effective method in controlling hazards.
Firstly, PPE does not eliminate or mitigate the source of the hazard. It only protects the individual wearing it, but it does not address the underlying cause of the hazard or prevent it from occurring. Other control measures, such as engineering controls or administrative controls, aim to eliminate or minimize the hazard at its source, providing more effective and long-term solutions.
Secondly, the effectiveness of PPE relies on individual compliance and proper usage. If workers do not consistently wear or correctly use PPE, it can lead to inadequate protection and increased risk of injury or illness. Factors such as discomfort, lack of training, or negligence can compromise the effectiveness of PPE.
Furthermore, PPE does not address potential exposure pathways. Hazards can still reach workers through inhalation, absorption, or ingestion, even if they are wearing protective equipment. Without addressing these exposure pathways, the overall effectiveness of PPE is limited.
To ensure comprehensive workplace safety, a hierarchy of controls should be followed, with PPE considered as the last line of defense. Engineering controls, such as isolating or removing the hazard, should be the primary focus, followed by administrative controls, such as work procedures and training. Only when these measures are insufficient or not feasible should PPE be relied upon.
In conclusion, while PPE plays a crucial role in protecting workers, it has become the least effective method in controlling hazards due to its limitations in eliminating the source of the hazard, relying on individual compliance, and not addressing exposure pathways. It should be used as a supplement to other control measures in a comprehensive approach to workplace safety.
Learn more about Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) here:
https://brainly.com/question/10901482
#SPJ11
For Oriole Company, sales is $1320000 (6600 units), fixed expenses are $480000, and the contribution margin per unit is $100. What is the margin of safety in dollars? $360000. $1140000. $120000. $780000.
The margin of safety in dollars is $360,000. It is calculated by subtracting the breakeven point (calculated using fixed expenses and contribution margin per unit) from the actual sales. In this case, the breakeven point is ($480,000 / $100) = 4,800 units.
The margin of safety is (6,600 units - 4,800 units) * $100 = $360,000. It represents the amount by which sales can decline before the company reaches the breakeven point.
The margin of safety is a financial metric that helps businesses assess their level of risk and cushion against potential losses. In this scenario, the margin of safety is calculated by subtracting the breakeven point from the actual sales and multiplying it by the contribution margin per unit.
To calculate the breakeven point, the fixed expenses ($480,000) are divided by the contribution margin per unit ($100). This gives us a breakeven point of 4,800 units.
Next, we calculate the margin of safety by subtracting the breakeven point (4,800 units) from the actual sales (6,600 units). The difference is 1,800 units.
Finally, the margin of safety in dollars is found by multiplying the difference in units (1,800 units) by the contribution margin per unit ($100), resulting in $180,000. therefore, the correct answer is not listed among the given options.
Learn more about contribution here:
https://brainly.com/question/32608937
#SPJ11
The FASB concepts statement relating to cash flow information introduces the concept of expected cash flows when using present values for accounting measurements. Assume that Smith Company determined that it has a 40% probability of receiving $10,000 one year from now and a 60% probability of receiving $10,000 two years from now. (Click here to access the PV and FV tables to use with this problem.) Required: Using the FASB concepts, calculate the present value of the expected cash flows assuming a 12% interest rate compounded annually. Round your answer to two decimal places. $ _____
The present value of the expected cash flows is $9,053.91.
To calculate the present value of the expected cash flows using the FASB concepts, we use the following formula: PV = ECF1 / (1 + i) + ECF2 / (1 + i)² where PV is the present value of the expected cash flows. ECF1 is the expected cash flow to be received one year from now. ECF2 is the expected cash flow to be received two years from now, i is the interest rate. Let's substitute the values we know into the formula: PV = (0.4 x $10,000) / (1 + 0.12) + (0.6 x $10,000) / (1 + 0.12)². PV = $4,000 / 1.12 + $6,000 / 1.2544PV = $3,571.43 + $4,482.48. PV = $9,053.91. Therefore, the present value of the expected cash flows is $9,053.91, rounded to two decimal places.
To know more about cash flows visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27994727
#SPJ11
Which of the following is the best description of the principle of comparative advantage? O Nations that have comparative advantage in producing a good should import that good for efficiency. O Nations that have an absolute advantage in producing a good should import that good for efficiency. O Large nations with fertile land and good climate for growing food will be less likely to trade with other nations. O Nations should specialize in producing goods for which they have lower opportunity costs than their trading partners. O Nations should specialize in producing goods for which they have higher opportunity costs than their trading partners.
The best description of the principle of comparative advantage is: Nations should specialize in producing goods for which they have lower opportunity costs than their trading partners.
The principle of comparative advantage states that nations should focus on producing goods or services for which they have a lower opportunity cost compared to their trading partners. Opportunity cost refers to the value of the next best alternative that must be given up when choosing one option over another.
By specializing in the production of goods with lower opportunity costs, nations can achieve greater efficiency and maximize their overall output. This allows them to trade with other nations and benefit from the differences in their relative efficiencies.
When each nation specializes in producing the goods or services in which they have a comparative advantage, they can then engage in international trade and exchange their products. This leads to increased economic welfare for all participating nations.
The best description of the principle of comparative advantage is that nations should specialize in producing goods for which they have lower opportunity costs than their trading partners. This principle promotes efficiency and mutually beneficial trade between nations.
To read more about comparative advantage, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31358892
#SPJ11
A manufacturing plant operation has fixed costs of $2,500,000 per year, and its output capacity is 0 - 100,000 electrical appliances per year. When the plant is operating at 100% capacity, the total variable cost is $3,500,000. The product sells for $90 per unit.
What is the maximum expected total revenue?
What is the variable cost per UNIT?
What is the expected profit if the plant operates at 85% capacity (85,000 units)?
What is the breakeven number of electrical appliances?
The maximum expected total revenue is $9,000,000.
The variable cost per unit is $35.
The expected profit when operating at 85% capacity is $3,950,000.
The breakeven number of electrical appliances is 27,778 units.
To calculate the maximum expected total revenue, we multiply the selling price per unit ($90) by the maximum output capacity of the plant (100,000 units). Thus, the maximum expected total revenue is $9,000,000.
The variable cost per unit can be determined by dividing the total variable cost ($3,500,000) by the maximum output capacity (100,000 units). Therefore, the variable cost per unit is $35.
To calculate the expected profit at 85% capacity, we need to find the expected revenue and subtract the variable and fixed costs. The expected revenue is the selling price per unit ($90) multiplied by the production level at 85% capacity (85,000 units). The variable cost is the variable cost per unit ($35) multiplied by the production level. The fixed cost remains constant at $2,500,000. By subtracting the variable and fixed costs from the expected revenue, we find that the expected profit is $3,950,000.
The breakeven number of electrical appliances is the point at which the total revenue equals the total cost. By dividing the fixed costs ($2,500,000) by the contribution margin (selling price per unit minus variable cost per unit), which is $90 - $35 = $55, we can determine the breakeven number of appliances, which is 27,778 units.
learn more about total revenue here:
https://brainly.com/question/25717864
#SPJ11
The 2019 balance sheet of Dyrdek’s Skate Shop, Inc., showed long-term debt of $6.4 million, and the 2020 balance sheet showed long-term debt of $6.8 million. The 2020 income statement showed an interest expense of $180,000. What was the firm’s cash flow to creditors during 2020?
The cash flow to creditors during 2020 for Dyrdek's Skate Shop, Inc. was $180,000.
The cash flow to creditors can be calculated by taking the difference between the long-term debt at the end of 2020 and the long-term debt at the beginning of 2020 and adding the interest expense. In this case, the long-term debt increased from $6.4 million to $6.8 million, indicating a net increase of $0.4 million. Additionally, the interest expense for 2020 was reported as $180,000. Therefore, the cash flow to creditors is $0.4 million (increase in long-term debt) plus $180,000 (interest expense), resulting in a total cash flow to creditors of $180,000.
Learn more about cash flow analysis here:
https://brainly.com/question/31737269
#SPJ11
Please do fast
Choose a product or service that you would like to sell (College Services, Life Insurance, Health Insurance, Financial Services. Investments, Used Cars. etc).
Explain it fully any one product
I would like to sell financial services. Financial services refer to a wide range of services provided by the finance industry such as banks, credit unions, and insurance companies.
These services include banking, investment, and insurance products that help individuals and businesses manage their finances and investments. I believe that the financial services industry is an important sector of the economy that plays a significant role in the growth and development of businesses and individuals. Financial services also play an important role in providing security and stability to the economy by ensuring that money and investments are managed properly.
Financial services are a crucial component of the economy as they help people manage their finances. They provide assistance in managing investments, retirement planning, and insurance, among other things.
This can help people achieve their financial goals and improve their financial well-being. Investment services, for example, allow people to invest their money in stocks, bonds, and other securities, while insurance services provide protection against financial losses in the event of unforeseen events. Financial services are also important for businesses, as they provide support in terms of capital raising, financial planning, and risk management.
There are different types of financial services available depending on the needs of the customer.
To know more about services visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30418810
#SPJ11
when a manufacturing company uses direct materials, it assigns the cost by debiting
When a manufacturing company uses direct materials, it assigns the cost by debiting the raw materials inventory account, reducing the cost of goods manufactured.
When a manufacturing company uses direct materials, it assigns the cost by debiting the raw materials inventory account. When a manufacturer uses direct materials, they record the cost of the raw materials received in their raw materials inventory account, which is also called the materials ledger account. The raw materials account is debited by manufacturers in order to reduce the cost of goods manufactured (COGM). Raw materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead are the three components of cost of goods manufactured.
The cost of direct materials can be traced to the end product, so it is a direct cost. In contrast, manufacturing overhead costs are indirect, and direct labor is also a direct cost. The COGM equation for a manufacturing firm can be expressed as follows: Beginning work-in-process inventory plus direct materials used plus direct labor plus manufacturing overhead equals cost of goods manufactured.
Learn more about company here:
https://brainly.com/question/28282776
#SPJ11
You have gathered the following vehicle costs: a. Calculate the annusl variable and fixed costs of the vehicle. b. Compute the operoting cost per mile. Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Caiculate the annual variable and fixed cots of the vehicie. Note: Do not round intermediate caicuiations. Round answer to nearest whole number.
When you have gathered the vehicle costs, to calculate the operating cost per mile, annual variable, and fixed costs of a vehicle, we need specific cost information.
To determine the annual variable and fixed costs of a vehicle, we need specific cost data, such as fuel expenses, maintenance and repair costs, insurance fees, and depreciation. Fixed costs typically include insurance premiums and vehicle registration fees, while variable costs consist of fuel costs and maintenance expenses that increase with mileage. By analyzing the costs over a specific period, we can separate them into fixed and variable components.
Once the costs are identified, the operating cost per mile can be calculated by dividing the total costs by the number of miles driven. This provides an estimation of the average cost incurred for each mile traveled.
However, without the specific cost details, it is not possible to generate accurate calculations for the annual variable and fixed costs or the operating cost per mile. To determine these values, you would need to gather the necessary cost information related to the vehicle's operation and maintenance.
Learn more about fixed costs here:
https://brainly.com/question/30057573
#SPJ11
to which element of the marketing mix is viral marketing most closely related?
Viral marketing is closely related to the promotion element of the marketing mix.
Viral marketing is a type of promotional method that uses social media and other digital channels to spread a message or idea rapidly and widely. This form of marketing is intended to generate buzz, create excitement, and ultimately drive sales for a product or service.
The effectiveness of viral marketing relies on creating content that is shareable, memorable, and engaging. The content needs to be something that people want to share with their friends and family, and it needs to be easily shareable on social media.
The effectiveness of viral marketing relies on creating content that is shareable, memorable, and engaging. The content needs to be something that people want to share with their friends and family, and it needs to be easily shareable on social media.
To learn about viral marketing here:
https://brainly.com/question/17144236
#SPJ11
Rubber City Cycles manufactures carbon fiber bicycle frames for professional racing and avid amateur cyclists. Rubber City has found a CNC (computer numerical control) machine that will significantly reduce manufacturing waste while improving the quality of the frames. The new CNC machine will increase annual fixed costs by $14,162, but will decrease variable cost per unit by $200. Rubber City expects to sell 750 frames next year. Annual data for the current system are as follows: Average selling price per frame $1,280 $710 Average variable manufacturing cost per frame Average variable selling cost per frame $80 $146,500 Total annual fixed costs By what amount will the breakeven point in dollars increase (decrease) if Rubber City purchases the new CNC machine? A. $321,324 B. ($321,324) C. ($84,480) D. $84,480
The amount by which the break-even point in dollars will decrease if Rubber City purchases the new CNC machine is $84,480.
Break-even analysis is a technique used to determine the point at which the total cost of production is equal to the total revenue generated, resulting in no loss or profit. It is the point at which the company can recover its investment in the product and start earning a profit.Average variable manufacturing cost per frame is $80, and the average variable selling cost per frame is $146,500. It follows that the total variable cost per unit is $146,580 ($80 + $146,500).The total fixed costs for the current system are $534,000 ($146,500 + $387,500).The total revenue for the current system is $960,000 ($1,280 × 750).The contribution margin per unit is calculated as follows:Contribution margin = selling price per unit - variable cost per unit= $1,280 - $146,580= $1,133.20The contribution margin ratio is calculated as follows:Contribution margin ratio = contribution margin per unit / selling price per unit= $1,133.20 / $1,280= 0.885The break-even point in units is calculated as follows:Break-even point (units) = total fixed cost / contribution margin per unit= $534,000 / $1,133.20= 471.26Therefore, the break-even point in units is 472.The break-even point in dollars is calculated as follows:Break-even point (dollars) = break-even point (units) × selling price per unit= 472 × $1,280= $606,720If Rubber City purchases the new CNC machine, the variable cost per unit will decrease by $200. As a result, the new variable cost per unit will be $146,380 ($146,580 - $200).The new total fixed costs will be $548,162 ($534,000 + $14,162).The new contribution margin per unit will be $1,333.20 ($1,280 - $146,380).The new contribution margin ratio will be 0.904 ($1,333.20 / $1,280).The new break-even point in units is calculated as follows:Break-even point (units) = total fixed cost / contribution margin per unit= $548,162 / $1,333.20= 411.52Therefore, the new break-even point in units is 412.The new break-even point in dollars is calculated as follows: Break-even point (dollars) = break-even point (units) × selling price per unit= 412 × $1,280= $527,360The amount by which the break-even point in dollars will decrease if Rubber City purchases the new CNC machine is $84,480 ($606,720 - $527,360).Therefore, option D, $84,480, is the correct answer.
know more about break-even point.
https://brainly.com/question/32507413
#SPJ11
3 pts Smart Labs Technologies just paid a dividend of $5.9 per share and it is expected to grow 15% each year for the next 4 years. After that, dividends will have a constant growth of 3% annually. The required rate of return for this stock is 11%. Given this information, what would be the share price for this firm? Round your answer to two decimals and enter your answer in the box below.
The dividend discount model (DDM) can be used to calculate the share price of Smart Labs Technologies. The DDM equation is:
Dividend / (Required Rate of Return - Dividend Growth Rate) = Share Price Given: D1 (first-year dividend) = $5.9 For the first four years, the dividend growth rate (g1) was 15%. After four years, the dividend growth rate (g2) is 3%. 11% is the required rate of return (r). We must compute the present value of dividends for the first four years and the present value of dividends beyond four years in order to determine the share price. Dividends' first four years' worth, in present value: PV1 is calculated as D1 / (1 + r) + D1 * (1 + g1) / (1 + r)² + D₁ * (1 + g₁)² / (1 + r)³ + D₁ * (1 + g₁)³ / (1 + r)⁴
Dividend Present Value after Four Years: PV2
Learn more about dividend discount model here:
https://brainly.com/question/32294678
#SPJ11
Suppose that the S\&P 500 , with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 16% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 7%. a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S\&P 500 of (i) 0 ; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0 ? (Leave no cells blank - be certain to enter " 0 " wherever required. Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter the value of Expected return as a percentage rounded to 2 decimal places and value of Beta rounded to 2 decimal places.) b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)
The expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from the S&P 500 and T-bills with different weights in the S&P 500 would be as follows:
(i) Expected Return: 7%, Beta: 0
(ii) Expected Return: 10.75%, Beta: 0.25
(iii) Expected Return: 14.5%, Beta: 0.5
(iv) Expected Return: 18.25%, Beta: 0.75
(v) Expected Return: 22%, Beta: 1.0
The expected return generally increases with an increase in beta. This is because beta measures the sensitivity of a portfolio's returns to the overall market returns.
A higher beta indicates a higher level of market risk, and investors require a higher expected return as compensation for taking on more risk. Therefore, as the beta of the portfolio increases, the expected return also tends to increase.
To know more about expected return refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/32133392#
#SPJ11
Suppose that the monopolist can produce with total cost: TC=10Q. Assume that the monopolist sells its goods in two different markets separated by some distance. The demand curves in the first market and the second market are given by Q 1 =120−l 1 and Q 2 =240−4l 2 . Suppose that consumers can mail the product from cheaper location to a more expensive location at a certain cost. What would be the critical mailing cost above which consumers do not have such an incentive?
a. 15
b. 30
c. 20
d. 10
The determine the critical mailing cost above which consumers do not have an incentive to mail the product, we need to compare the prices of the monopolist's goods in the two markets.
Let's assume that the monopolist sets the same price in both markets. In that case, the price of the good in the first market would be P1 = 120 - Q1 and the price in the second market would be P2 = 240 - 4Q2.If consumers can mail the product from the cheaper location (first market) to the more expensive location (second market) at a cost, they would do so as long as the price difference between the two markets exceeds the mailing cost.So, the critical mailing cost would be the price difference between the two markets: P2 - P1.
learn more about monopolist's here :
https://brainly.com/question/32611254
#SPJ11
As the manager of a monopoly, you face potential government regulation. Your inverse demand is P = 40 − 2Q, and your costs are C(Q) = 8Q.
a. Determine the monopoly price and output.
Monopoly price: $
Monopoly output: _______ units
b. Determine the socially efficient price and output.
Socially efficient price: $
Socially efficient output: ________ units
c. What is the maximum amount your firm should be willing to spend on lobbying efforts to prevent the price from being regulated at the socially optimal level?
To determine the monopoly price and output, we need to find the profit-maximizing quantity where marginal revenue equals marginal cost. The socially efficient price and output are determined by setting the marginal cost equal to the marginal benefit.
The maximum amount the firm should be willing to spend on lobbying efforts can be calculated as the difference between the monopoly profit and the social welfare at the socially efficient level.
a. To find the monopoly price and output, we set marginal revenue equal to marginal cost. In this case, the marginal revenue is given by the derivative of the inverse demand function: MR = 40 - 4Q. The marginal cost is given by the derivative of the cost function: MC = 8. Setting MR equal to MC, we have 40 - 4Q = 8. Solving for Q, we find Q = 8. Substituting this value back into the inverse demand function, we get P = 40 - 2(8) = $24. Therefore, the monopoly price is $24 and the monopoly output is 8 units.
b. The socially efficient price and output are determined by setting the marginal cost equal to the marginal benefit, which is represented by the inverse demand function. Setting MC = P, we have 8 = 40 - 2Q. Solving for Q, we find Q = 16. Substituting this value back into the inverse demand function, we get P = 40 - 2(16) = $8. Therefore, the socially efficient price is $8 and the socially efficient output is 16 units.
c. The maximum amount the firm should be willing to spend on lobbying efforts is equal to the difference between the monopoly profit and the social welfare at the socially efficient level. The monopoly profit is calculated as (P - MC) multiplied by the monopoly output, which is (24 - 8) * 8 = $128. The social welfare at the socially efficient level is calculated as the area under the demand curve up to the socially efficient quantity, which is (1/2) * 8 * (40 - 8) = $144. Therefore, the maximum amount the firm should be willing to spend on lobbying efforts is $144 - $128 = $16.
Learn more about marginal benefit here:
https://brainly.com/question/19091725
#SPJ11
Value of Operations: Constant Growth EMC Corporation has never paid a dividend. Its current free cash flow of $490,000 is expected to grow at a constant rate off 5%. The weighted average cost of capital is WACC-12.5%. Calculate EMC'S estimated value of operations.
The weighted average cost of capital is WACC-12.5% then the estimated value of EMC Corporation's operations is $6,160,000.
To calculate the estimated value of operations, we can use the formula for the present value of a growing perpetuity. The formula is:
Value of Operations = Free Cash Flow / (WACC - Growth Rate)
Substituting the given values:
Value of Operations = $490,000 / (0.125 - 0.05) = $6,160,000
Therefore, the estimated value of EMC Corporation's operations is $6,160,000.
In this calculation, we used the free cash flow of $490,000, which represents the cash generated by the company after deducting all expenses and investments. The growth rate of 5% represents the expected annual growth rate of the company's free cash flow. The weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 12.5% is the average rate of return required by the company's investors.
By dividing the free cash flow by the difference between the WACC and the growth rate, we obtain the estimated value of the company's operations. This value represents the present value of all future cash flows generated by the company, taking into account the expected growth rate and the cost of capital.
Learn more about WACC here:
https://brainly.com/question/33116653
#SPJ11
An investment project has an initial cost of $60,000 and expected cash inflows of $12,500 , $17,800 , $21,600 , and $25,800 over years 1 to 4, respectively. If the required rate of return is 8 percent, what is the net present value?
The net present value is $5,456.25.NPV is used in capital budgeting and investment planning to analyze the profitability of a projected investment or project.
The net present value (NPV) is the difference between the present value of cash inflows and the present value of cash outflows over a period of time. The formula for calculating NPV is:
NPV = (CF₁ / (1 + r)¹) + (CF₂ / (1 + r)²) + … + (CFₙ / (1 + r)ⁿ) - Initial Investment
Where:
CF₁, CF₂, …, CFₙ are cash inflows in periods 1 through n.
r is the discount rate.
n is the number of periods.
Initial Investment is the initial cost of the investment.
In this case, the initial cost of the investment is $60,000 and the cash inflows are $12,500, $17,800, $21,600 and $25,800 over years 1 to 4 respectively. The required rate of return is 8%. Therefore:
NPV = (-$60,000 / (1 + 0.08)⁰) + ($12,500 / (1 + 0.08)¹) + ($17,800 / (1 + 0.08)²) + ($21,600 / (1 + 0.08)³) + ($25,800 / (1 + 0.08)⁴)
NPV = -$60,000 + $11,574.07 + $15,972.22 + $17,997.10 + $19,912.86
NPV = $5,456.25. Therefore, the net present value is $5,456.25.
Learn more about net present value here:
https://brainly.com/question/32720837
#SPJ11
.You are a manager of a local Walmart store which sells groceries and other products to 30,000 customers per week. Currently, you employ 80 cashiers and 10 automated check-out machines (customers scan and pay for their purchases without a cashier’s assistance). Each cashier is paid wages and fringe benefits for $800 per week. It also costs you $800 per weeks to lease each machine (price includes installation, software support, and servicing). A vendor offered to lease you additional machines at this price. You estimate that by leasing 10 more machines you can meet your service requirements with 30 fewer cashiers. Should you lease the additional machines or continue to service your customers with your current input mix?
a. You estimate that you can service 30,000 customers with the following combinations of cashiers and machines. What combination of inputs has the lowest possible cost?
Cashiers
Machines
80
10
50
20
30
30
22
40
15
50
12
60
b. Plot the input combinations in the table on a graph that contains cashiers on the vertical axis and machines on the horizontal axis. Connects the points to draw an isoquant curve. Add the cost minimizing isocost curve to the graph (you can derive this line from the input prices and the minimized total cost). What is slope of the isocost curve? What is the slope of the isoquant curve at the optimal input combination?
c. Suppose the marginal product of cashiers at the optimal input combination is 500. What does this mean? What is the marginal product of machines at this point?
d. Are there any other factors that should be considered in making this decision on the optimal mix of machines and cashiers.
a. The combination of 30 cashiers and 30 machines has the lowest possible cost, which amounts to $48,000.
b. The slope of the isocost curve is -1 (the negative ratio of input prices). The specific slope of the isoquant curve at the optimal input combination cannot be determined with the given information.
c. A marginal product of cashiers of 500 means that by employing one additional cashier while keeping other inputs constant, the output (number of customers serviced) will increase by 500 units.
d. Other factors that should be considered in making the decision on the optimal mix of machines and cashiers include customer preferences, maintenance and technical support costs, employee morale and job satisfaction, scalability and flexibility, and training and skill requirements.
a. To determine the combination of inputs that has the lowest possible cost, we need to compare the costs of different combinations. Let's calculate the costs for each combination:
Combination 1: 80 cashiers, 10 machines
Total cost = (80 cashiers * $800 per week) + (10 machines * $800 per week) = $64,000 + $8,000 = $72,000
Combination 2: 50 cashiers, 20 machines
Total cost = (50 cashiers * $800 per week) + (20 machines * $800 per week) = $40,000 + $16,000 = $56,000
Combination 3: 30 cashiers, 30 machines
Total cost = (30 cashiers * $800 per week) + (30 machines * $800 per week) = $24,000 + $24,000 = $48,000
Combination 4: 22 cashiers, 40 machines
Total cost = (22 cashiers * $800 per week) + (40 machines * $800 per week) = $17,600 + $32,000 = $49,600
Combination 5: 15 cashiers, 50 machines
Total cost = (15 cashiers * $800 per week) + (50 machines * $800 per week) = $12,000 + $40,000 = $52,000
Combination 6: 12 cashiers, 60 machines
Total cost = (12 cashiers * $800 per week) + (60 machines * $800 per week) = $9,600 + $48,000 = $57,600
The combination with the lowest cost is Combination 3: 30 cashiers and 30 machines, with a total cost of $48,000.
b. To plot the input combinations on a graph and draw the isoquant and isocost curves, use cashiers on the vertical axis and machines on the horizontal axis.
The slope of the isocost curve represents the ratio of the input prices. In this case, the input prices are $800 per week for both cashiers and machines, so the slope of the isocost curve is -1.
The slope of the isoquant curve at the optimal input combination represents the marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS). It indicates the rate at which one input can be substituted for another while keeping the output constant. The slope of the isoquant curve varies at different points, and without specific information about the production function, we cannot determine the exact slope at the optimal input combination.
c. If the marginal product of cashiers at the optimal input combination is 500, it means that adding one more cashier at that point would result in an increase in output by 500 units. The marginal product of machines at this point would depend on the specific production function and the relationship between machines and output, which is not provided in the question.
d. Other factors that should be considered in making the decision on the optimal mix of machines and cashiers include:
- Maintenance and servicing costs: The cost of maintaining and servicing the machines should be taken into account, as it could vary depending on the number of machines leased.
- Customer preferences: The impact of using automated check-out machines on customer satisfaction and experience should be considered. Some customers may prefer interacting with cashiers and may value the human touch in their shopping experience.
- Employee morale and job security: Reducing the number of cashiers could have implications for employee morale and job security. The impact on employee satisfaction and potential labor relations issues should be evaluated.
- Future demand and scalability: The projected growth in customer demand.
Learn more about marginal rate here:
https://brainly.com/question/31361595
#SPJ11
Costco. has recently introduced new magnetic brake rotors for use in high end car models. It introduced the product sometime early in January 2018 and has sold 300,000 units on account in its first year end, December 31, 2018. Each unit is sold for $500 and carries a two-year repair or replacement warranty. Warranties on similar products are available with competitors at $75 each. After some research, it was determined that 35% of the revenues would be recognized in the year of sale and the balance in the year following the sale. The company estimates its warranty expenses to be $25 per unit and has recorded $3 million as actual warranty costs in the first year of business. 1. Prepare all the entries required, using the service-type approach for the year 2018. 2. Prepare all the entries required, using the assurance-type approach for the year 2018. Record actual warranty costs prior to the year-end adjustment.
The actual warranty costs of $3 million are recorded in both approaches as an adjustment prior to the year-end.
1. Entries using the service-type approach for the year 2018:
a) To record sales: Accounts Receivable $150,000,000 Sales Revenue $150,000,000 (300,000 units x $500 per unit)
b) To recognize revenue: Sales Revenue $52,500,000 Unearned Revenue $52,500,000 (35% of $150,000,000)
c) To record warranty expenses: Warranty Expense $7,500,000 Warranty Liability $7,500,000 (300,000 units x $25 per unit)
d) To record actual warranty costs: Warranty Liability $3,000,000 Cash $3,000,000
2. Entries using the assurance-type approach for the year 2018:
a) To record sales: Accounts Receivable $150,000,000 Sales Revenue $150,000,000 (300,000 units x $500 per unit)
b) To record warranty revenue: Warranty Revenue $10,500,000 Unearned Warranty Revenue $10,500,000 (300,000 units x ($500 - $75))
c) To record warranty expenses: Warranty Expense $7,500,000 Warranty Liability $7,500,000 (300,000 units x $25 per unit)
d) To record actual warranty costs: Warranty Liability $3,000,000 Cash $3,000,000
In the service-type approach, revenue is recognized based on the percentage of completion, where 35% of the revenue is recognized in the year of sale. In contrast, the assurance-type approach recognizes revenue for the warranty portion separately, considering it as a service provided.
In both approaches, sales and warranty expenses are recorded. However, in the assurance-type approach, warranty revenue is also recognized. The difference in warranty revenue reflects the lower cost of the warranty offered by Costco compared to competitors.
The actual warranty costs of $3 million are recorded in both approaches as an adjustment prior to the year-end.
Learn more about warranty costs from the link
https://brainly.com/question/30199930
#SPJ11
How much would you have to Invest today to recelve: Use Appendix B and Appendix D. (Round "PV Factor" to 3 decimal places. Round the final answers to the nearest whole dollar.) a. $12,250 in 6 years at 10 percent? Present value $ b. $16,000 in 17 years at 7 percent? Present value c. $6,000 each year for 13 years at 7 percent? Present value $ d. $6,000 each year, at the beginning, for 26 years at 7 percent? Presentvalue $ e. $52,000 each year for 25 years at 7 percent? Present value $ f. $52,000 each year for 26 years, at the beginning. at 7 percent? Present value $
To calculate the present value of each investment, we need to use the Present Value (PV) formula:
PV = [tex]Future Value / (1 + Interest Rate)^Time[/tex]; where PV is the present value, Future Value is the desired future amount, Interest Rate is the annual interest rate, and Time is the number of years.
a. $12,250 in 6 years at 10 percent:
PV = $[tex]12,250 / (1 + 0.10)^6[/tex]
PV = $7,080 (rounded to the nearest whole dollar)
b. $16,000 in 17 years at 7 percent:
PV = $[tex]16,000 / (1 + 0.07)^17[/tex]
PV = $5,980 (rounded to the nearest whole dollar)
c. $6,000 each year for 13 years at 7 percent:
PV = $[tex]6,000 * [(1 - (1 + 0.07)^-13) / 0.07][/tex]
PV = $52,775 (rounded to the nearest whole dollar)
d. $6,000 each year, at the beginning, for 26 years at 7 percent:
PV = $[tex]6,000 * [(1 - (1 + 0.07)^-26) / 0.07] * (1 + 0.07)[/tex]
PV = $121,791 (rounded to the nearest whole dollar)
e. $52,000 each year for 25 years at 7 percent:
PV = $[tex]52,000 * [(1 - (1 + 0.07)^-25) / 0.07][/tex]
PV = $659,131 (rounded to the nearest whole )
f. $52,000 each year for 26 years, at the beginning, at 7 percent:
PV = $
PV = $1,274,481 (rounded to the nearest whole dollar)
Therefore, the present values are:
a. $7,080
b. $5,980
c. $52,775
d. $121,791
e. $659,131
f. $1,274,481
To learn more about present value, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/28304447
#SPJ11
