Consider the following possibilities and select the correct choice.
1. Tx Ty > Tz
2. Tx Ty < Tz
3. Tx Ty = Tz

Answer:

We can also prove the conservation of mechanical energy of a freely falling body by the work-energy theorem, which states that change in kinetic energy of a body is equal to work done on it. i.e. W=ΔK. And ΔE=ΔK+ΔU. Hence the mechanical energy of the body is conserved

Explanation:

Answer:

time of fall is 1.75 s and the velocity with which it strikes the water is 17.15 m/s.

Explanation:

Height, h =  15 m

Newton's second law

Force = mass x acceleration

The unit of gravitational force is Newton and the value is m x g.

where, m is the mas and g is the acceleration due to gravity.  

Let the time of fall is t.

Use second equation of motion

[tex]s= u t +0.5 at^2\\\\15 = 0 +0.5\times 9.8\times t^{2}\\\\t = 1.75 s[/tex]

Let the final speed is v.

Use third equation of motion

[tex]v^2 = u^2 + 2 a s\\\\v^2 = 0 + 2 \times 9.8\times 15\\\\v =17.15 m/s[/tex]

If a person wants to calculate the length of time it takes for a ball to fall from a height of 20m, the correct equation that they should use is:

D. Δt= √2Δd/a

The free fall formula should be used to obtain the length of time that it takes for a ball to fall from a given height. This formula also factors the height or distance from which the fall occurred and this is denoted by the letter d. The small letter 'a' is denotative of acceleration due to gravity and this is a constant pegged at -9.98 m/s².

So, the change in height is obtained and multiplied by two. This is further divided by the acceleration and the square root of the derived answer translates to the time taken for the ball to fall from the height of 20m. Of all the options listed, option D represents the correct equation.

Learn more about free fall here:

https://brainly.com/question/12167131

#SPJ1

Answer:

2.8 MW

Explanation:

There are 7 wind turbines in the wind farm as shown in the diagram. Thus, the energy output by one turbine is 1/7 if the total energy output. So, 19.6/7=2.8MW

Explanation:

Specifically his leg muscles. As the leg muscles expand, they push down on the ground. Newton's 3rd law says that for any action, there's an opposite and equal reaction. That means a downward push into the ground will have the ground push back, more or less, and that's why the kangaroo will jump. The ground (and the earth entirely) being much more massive compared to the animal means that the ground doesn't move while the kangaroo does move. Perhaps on a very microscopic tiny level the ground/earth does move but it's so small that we practically consider it 0.

This experiment can be done with a wall as well. Go up to a wall and lean against it with your hands. Then do a pushup to move further away from the wall, but you don't necessarily need to lose contact with the wall's surface. As you push against the wall, the wall pushes back, and that causes you to move backward. If the wall was something flimsy like cardboard, then you could easily push the wall over and you wouldn't move back very much. It all depends how much mass is in the object you're pushing on.  

Answer:

a scale is used to measure the mass of the body

Answer:

[tex]\lambda=1.39\times 10^{-4}\ s^{-1}[/tex]

Explanation:

Given that,

The half-life of Barium-139 is [tex]4.96\times 10^3[/tex]

A sample contains [tex]3.21\times 10^{17}[/tex] nuclei.

We need to find the decay constant for this decay. The formula for half life is given by :

[tex]T_{1/2}=\dfrac{0.693}{\lambda}\\\\\lambda=\dfrac{0.693}{T_{1/2}}[/tex]

Put all the values,

[tex]\lambda=\dfrac{0.693}{4.96\times 10^3}\\\\=1.39\times 10^{-4}\ s^{-1}[/tex]

So, the decay constant is [tex]1.39\times 10^{-4}\ s^{-1}[/tex].

I don't know

because I don't know

Answer:

0.32 m.

Explanation:

To solve this problem, we must recognise that:

1. At the maximum height, the velocity of the ball is zero.

2. When the velocity of the ball is 2.5 m/s above the ground, it is assumed that the potential energy and kinetic energy of the ball are the same.

With the above information in mind, we shall determine the height of the ball when it has a speed of 2.5 m/s. This can be obtained as follow:

Mass (m) = constant

Acceleration due to gravity (g) = 9.8 m/s²

Velocity (v) = 2.5 m/s

Height (h) =?

PE = KE

Recall:

PE = mgh

KE = ½mv²

Thus,

PE = KE

mgh = ½mv²

Cancel m from both side

gh = ½v²

9.8 × h = ½ × 2.5²

9.8 × h = ½ × 6.25

9.8 × h = 3.125

Divide both side by 9.8

h = 3.125 / 9.8

h = 0.32 m

Thus, the height of the ball when it has a speed of 2.5 m/s is 0.32 m.

Explanation:

The logarithmic damping decrement of a mathematical pendulum is DeltaT=0.5. How will the amplitude of oscillations decrease during one full oscillation of the pendulum

Answer:

a) the most probable speed of the molecules is 409.2 m/s

b) required temperature of xenon is 1322 K

Explanation:

Given the data in the question;

a)

Maximum probable speed of hydrogen molecule (H₂)

[tex]V_{H_2[/tex] = √( 2RT / [tex]M_{H_2[/tex] )

where R = 8.314 m³.Pa.K⁻¹.mol⁻¹ and given that T = 20.3 K

molar mass of H₂; [tex]M_{H_2[/tex] = 2.01588 g/mol

we substitute

[tex]V_{H_2[/tex] = √( (2 × 8.314 × 20.3 ) / 2.01588 × 10⁻³  )

[tex]V_{H_2[/tex] = √( 337.5484 / 2.01588 × 10⁻³  )

[tex]V_{H_2[/tex] = 409.2 m/s

Therefore, the most probable speed of the molecules is 409.2 m/s

b)

Temperature of xenon  = ?

Temperature of hydrogen = 20.3 K

we know that;

T = (Vxe² × Mxe) / 2R

molar mass of xenon; Mxe = 131.292 g/mol

so we substitute

T = ( (409.2)² × 131.292 × 10⁻³) / 2( 8.314  )

T = 21984.14167 / 16.628

T = 1322 K

Therefore, required temperature of xenon is 1322 K

Answer:

a) S =  63.2 km/h

b) V =  63.2 km/h*(-0.316 , 0.949)

Explanation:

Let's define:

North as the positive y-axis

East as the positive x-axis.

Also, remember the relation:

Distance = Time*Speed

Let's assume that she starts at the position (0km, 0km)

Then she travels due North at 90km/h for two hours, then the displacement is

90km/h*2h = 180km to the north

Then the new position is:

(0km, 180km)

Then she travels West at 60km/h for one hour.

Then the distance traveled to the West (negative x-axis) is:

60km/h*1h = 60km to the west

Then the new position is:

(-60km, 180km).

a) The average speed is defined as the quotient between the displacement and the time.

We know that the total time traveled is 3 hours.

And the displacement is the difference between the final position and the initial position.

this is:

D = √( -60km - 0km)^2 + (180km - 0km)^2)=

D = √( (60km)^2 + (180km)^2) = 189.7 km

Then the average speed is:

S = (189.7 km)/(3 h) = 63.2 km/h

b) Now we want to find the average velocity, this will be equal to the average speed times a versor that points from the origin to the direction of the final position.

So, if the final position is (-60km, 180km)

We need to find a vector that represents the same angle, but that is on the unit circle.

Then, if the module of the final position is 189.7 km (as we found above), then the versor is just given by:

(-60km/ 189.7 km, 180km/ 189.7 km)

(-60/189.7 , 180/189.7)

We can just check that the module of the above versor is 1.

[tex]module = \sqrt{(\frac{-60}{189.7} )^2 + (\frac{180}{189.7} )^2} = \frac{1}{189.7}* \sqrt{(-60 )^2 + (180 )^2} = 1[/tex]

Then the average velocity is:

V = 63.2 km/h*(-60/189.7 , 180/189.7)

We can simplify our versor so the velocity equation is easier to read:

V = 63.2 km/h*(-0.316 , 0.949)

Answer:

Explanation:

Given that:

Focal length for the objective lens = 20 mm, 4 mm, 1.4 mm

For objective lens of focal length f₁ = 20 mm

s₁' = 120 mm + 20 mm = 140 mm

∴

Magnification [tex]m_1 = \dfrac{s'_1}{f_1}[/tex]

[tex]m_1 = \dfrac{140}{20}[/tex]

[tex]m_1 = 7 \ m[/tex]

For objective lens of focal length f₁ = 4 mm

s₁' = 120 mm + 4 mm = 124 mm

[tex]m_1 = \dfrac{s'_1}{f_1}[/tex]

[tex]m_1 = \dfrac{124}{4}[/tex]

[tex]m_1 = 31 \ m[/tex]

For objective lens of focal length f₁ = 1.4 mm

s₁' = 120 mm + 1.4 mm = 121.4 mm

[tex]m_1 = \dfrac{s'_1}{f_1}[/tex]

[tex]m_1 = \dfrac{121.4}{1.4}[/tex]

[tex]m_1 = 86.71 \ m[/tex]

The magnification of the eyepiece is given as:

[tex]m_e = 5X \ and \ m_e = 15X[/tex]

Thus, the largest angular magnification when  [tex]m_1 \ and \ m_e \ are \ large \ is:[/tex]

[tex]M_{large}= (m_1)_{large} \times (m_e)_{large}[/tex]

= 86.71 × 15

= 1300.65

The smallest angular magnification derived when [tex]m_1 \ and \ m_e \ are \ small \ is:[/tex]

[tex]M_{small}= (m_1)_{small} \times (m_e)_{small}[/tex]

= 7 × 5

= 35

The largest magnification will be 1300.65 and the smallest magnification will be 35.

Magnification is defined as the ratio of the size of the image of an object to the actual size of the object.

Now for objective lens and eyepieces, it is defined as the ratio of the focal length of the objective lens to the focal length of the eyepiece.

It is given in the question:

Focal lengths for the objective lens is = 20 mm, 4 mm, 1.4 mm

now we will calculate the magnification for all three focal lengths of the objective lens.

Also, each objective forms an image 120 mm beyond its second focal point.

(1) For an objective lens of focal length   [tex]f_1=20 \ mm[/tex]

[tex]s_1'=120\ mm +20 \ mm =140\ mm[/tex]

Magnification will be calculated as

[tex]m_1=\dfrac{s_1'}{f_1} =\dfrac{140}{20} =7[/tex]

(2) For an objective lens of focal length [tex]f_1= \ 4 \ mm[/tex]

s₁' = 120 mm + 4 mm = 124 mm

[tex]m_1=\dfrac{s_1'}{f_1} =\dfrac{124}{4} =31[/tex]

(3) For an objective lens of focal length [tex]f_1=1.4\ mm[/tex]

s₁' = 120 mm + 1.4 mm = 121.4 mm

[tex]m_1=\dfrac{s_1'}{f_1} =\dfrac{121.4}{1.4} =86.71[/tex]

Now the magnification of the eyepiece is given as:

[tex]m_e=5x\ \ \ & \ \ m_e=15x[/tex]

Thus, the largest angular magnification when  

[tex]m_1 = 86.17\ \ \ \ m_e=15x[/tex]

[tex]m_{large}= (m_1)_{large}\times (m_e)_{large}[/tex]

[tex]m_{large}=86.71\times 15=1300.65[/tex]

The smallest angular magnification derived when

[tex]m_1=7\ \ \ \ m_e=5[/tex]

[tex]m_{small}=(m_1)_{small}\times (m_e)_{small}[/tex]

[tex]m_{small}=7\times 5=35[/tex]

Thus the largest magnification will be 1300.65 and the smallest magnification will be 35.

To know more about magnification follow

https://brainly.com/question/1599771

Answer:

the person  is sitting 1.5 m from the left end of the board

Explanation:

Given the data in the question;

Wb = 125 N

Wm = 500 N

T₂ = 250 N

Now, we know that;

T₁ + T₂ = Wb + Wm

T₁ + 250 = 125 + 500

T₁ = 125 + 500 - 250

T₁ = 375 N

so tension of the left chain is 375 N.

Now, taking torque about the left end

500 × d + 125 × 2 = 250 × 4

500d + 250 = 1000

500d = 1000 - 250

500d = 750

d = 750 / 500

d = 1.5 m

Therefore, the person  is sitting 1.5 m from the left end of the board.

Answer:

We want to solve the sum:

6.74*10⁴ + 8.95*10⁴

first, we take the common factor 10⁴ out, so we get:

(6.74 + 8.95)*10⁴

Now we solve the sum:

(15.66)*10⁴

Now we want to rewrite it in exponential form, wo we can rewrite it as:

(15.66)*10⁴ = (1.566*10)*10⁴ = (1.566)*10*10⁴ = (1.566)*10⁴⁺¹ = 1.566*10⁵

k = 5.

Answer:

Josiah Spiers in 1867 was when scripture union was founded

Answer:

To correct the defects of vision by measuring the radius of curvature and thus the power of the lenses.

Explanation:

A spherometer is an instrument used to measure the curvature of objects such as lenses and curved mirrors.

Generally it consists of a fine screw which is moving in a nut carried on the center of a 3 small legged table or frame. The feet forms the vertices of an equilateral triangle. The lower end of the screw and those of the table legs are finely tapered and terminate in hemispheres.

If the screw has two turns of the thread to the milli meter the head is generally divided into 50 equal parts, so that differences of 0.01 millimeter may be measured without using a vernier scale.

The spherometer is used to measure the radius of curvature of the lenses so that the opthalmologist find the focal length of the lens and then give the  power to the lens to correct the defects of vision.  

Answer:

Explanation:

From the question;

We will make assumptions of certain values since they are not given but the process to achieve the end result will be the same thing.

We are to calculate the following task, i.e. to determine the electric field at the distances:

a)  at 4.75 cm

b)  at 20.5 cm

c) at 125.0 cm

Given that:

the charge (q) = 33.3 nC/m

= 33.3 × 10⁻⁹ c/m

radius of rod = 5.75 cm

a) from the given information, we will realize that the distance lies inside the rod. Provided that there is no charge distribution inside the rod.

Then, the electric field will be zero.

b) The electric field formula [tex]E = \dfrac{kq }{d}[/tex]

[tex]E = \dfrac{9 \times 10^9 \times (33.3 \times 10^{-9}) }{0.205}[/tex]

E = 1461.95 N/C

c) The electric field E is calculated as:

[tex]E = \dfrac{9 \times 10^9 \times (33.3 \times 10^{-9}) }{1.25}[/tex]

E = 239.76 N/C

Binary code is the answer

Answer:

binary code is the answer of blank

Answer:

[tex]\triangle P=1.95*10^{-4}[/tex]

Explanation:

Mass [tex]m=0.001[/tex]

Diameter [tex]d=1.2m[/tex]

Length [tex]l=10m[/tex]

Generally the equation for Volume flow rate is mathematically given by

 [tex]Q=AV[/tex]

 [tex]V=\frac{Q}{\pi/4D^2}[/tex]

 [tex]V=\frac{0.001}{\pi/4(1.2)^2}[/tex]

 [tex]V=8.84*10^{-4}[/tex]

Generally the equation for Friction factor is mathematically given by

 [tex]F=\frac{64}{Re}[/tex]

Where Re

Re=Reynolds Number

 [tex]Re=\frac{pVD}{\mu}[/tex]

 [tex]Re=\frac{1000*8.84*10^{-4}*1.2}{1.002*10^{-3}}[/tex]

 [tex]Re=1040[/tex]

Therefore

 [tex]F=\frac{64}{Re}[/tex]

 [tex]F=\frac{64}{1040}[/tex]

 [tex]F=0.06[/tex]

Generally the equation for Friction factor is mathematically given by

 [tex]Head loss=\frac{fLv^2}{2dg}[/tex]

 [tex]H=\frac{0.06*10*(8.9*10^-4)^2}{2*1.2*9.81}[/tex]

 [tex]H=19.9*10^{-9}[/tex]

Where

[tex]H=\frac{\triangle P}{\rho g}[/tex]

[tex]\triangle P=\frac{19.9*10^{-9}}{10^3*(9.81)}[/tex]

[tex]\triangle P=H*\rho g[/tex]

[tex]\triangle P=1.95*10^{-4}[/tex]

Answer:

Maria Corazon Sumulong Cojuangco Aquino, popularly known as Cory Aquino, was a Filipino politician who served as the 11th President of the Philippines, the first woman to hold that office.

Answer:

Former President of the Philippines

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

There are two main ways to de-starch leaves of a plant - the 'Light Exclusion' Method and the 'Carbon Dioxide Deprivation' Method. The 'Light Exclusion' method is a simpler procedure and is used often. Leaves can be destarched by depriving them of light for an extended period of time, usually 24-48 hours.

Answer:

The tub turns 37.520 revolutions during the 25-second interval.

Explanation:

The total number of revolutions done by the tub of the washer ([tex]\Delta n[/tex]), in revolutions, is the sum of the number of revolutions done in the acceleration ([tex]\Delta n_{1}[/tex]), in revolutions, and deceleration stages ([tex]\Delta n_{2}[/tex]), in revolutions:

[tex]\Delta n = \Delta n_{1} + \Delta n_{2}[/tex] (1)

Then, we expand the previous expression by kinematic equations for uniform accelerated motion:

[tex]\Delta n = \frac{1}{2}\cdot ( \ddot n_{1}\cdot t_{1}^{2} - \ddot n_{2} \cdot t_{2}^{2})[/tex] (1b)

Where:

[tex]\ddot n_{1}, \ddot n_{2}[/tex] - Angular accelerations for acceleration and deceleration stages, in revolutions per square second.

[tex]t_{1}, t_{2}[/tex] - Acceleration and deceleration times, in seconds.

And each acceleration is determined by the following formulas:

Acceleration

[tex]\ddot n_{1} = \frac{\dot n}{t_{1}}[/tex] (2)

Deceleration

[tex]\ddot n_{2} = -\frac{\dot n}{t_{2} }[/tex] (3)

Where [tex]\dot n[/tex] is the maximum angular velocity of the tub of the washer, in revolutions per second.

If we know that [tex]\dot n = 3\,\frac{rev}{s}[/tex], [tex]t_{1} = 13\,s[/tex] and [tex]t_{2} = 12\,s[/tex], then the quantity of revolutions done by the tub is:

[tex]\ddot n_{1} = \frac{3\,\frac{rev}{s} }{13\,s}[/tex]

[tex]\ddot n_{1} = 0.231\,\frac{rev}{s^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\ddot n_{2} = -\frac{3\,\frac{rev}{s} }{12\,s}[/tex]

[tex]\ddot n_{2} = -0.25\,\frac{rev}{s^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\Delta n = \frac{1}{2}\cdot ( \ddot n_{1}\cdot t_{1}^{2} + \ddot n_{2} \cdot t_{2}^{2})[/tex]

[tex]\Delta n = \frac{1}{2}\cdot \left[\left(0.231\,\frac{rev}{s^{2}} \right)\cdot (13\,s)^{2}-\left(-0.25\,\frac{rev}{s^{2}} \right)\cdot (12\,s)^{2}\right][/tex]

[tex]\Delta n = 37.520\,rev[/tex]

The tub turns 37.520 revolutions during the 25-second interval.

Answer:

Answer:

I don't see anything on your question?

The reason why we are unlikely to see fluctuations in light output in extragalactic sources with a diameter of about one light day over timescales shorter than about one day is due to the size and distance of the source, as well as the speed of light.

When we observe an extragalactic source with a diameter of about one light day, we are essentially observing light that has traveled a very long distance through space to reach us. This light may have originated from a region of the source that is changing in brightness or emitting intense bursts of light, but by the time the light reaches us, these fluctuations are smeared out over a longer period of time due to the speed of light.

For example, if the source were emitting a burst of light that lasted for only a few hours, by the time that light travelled a distance of one light day (which is about 25 billion miles or 40 billion kilometres), the burst would be spread out over a longer period of time. This is because the light emitted at the beginning of the burst would have already traveled a significant distance away from the light emitted at the end of the burst by the time it reached us. As a result, we would observe the burst as a more gradual increase and decrease in light output over a period of several days, rather than a sharp increase and decrease over a few hours.

In addition, the turbulent interstellar and intergalactic media that the light passes through can also scatter and delay the light, further smearing out any short-term fluctuations in light output. This effect is known as interstellar scintillation and can make it even more difficult to observe short-term variations in the light output of extragalactic sources.

To know more about extragalactic sources follow

https://brainly.com/question/15023361

#SPJ6

Answer:

Fr = 1.91 * 9*10⁹*q²/L²

Explanation:

Let´s say that the corners of the square are  A B C and D

We are going to find out the force on the charge placed on B  ( the charge placed in the upper right corner.

As all the charges are positive (the same sign), then all the three forces on the charge in B are of rejection.

Force due to charge placed in A

module   Fₓ =  K* q² / L²   in the direction of x

Force due to charge placed in C

module  Fy = K* q²/L²   in the direction of y

Force due to  the charge placed in D

That force will have the direction of the diagonal of the square, and the distance between charges placed in D and A is the length of the diagonal.

d²  =  L²  +  L²  =  2*L²

d  =  √2 * L

The module of the force due to charge place in D

F₄₅ = K*q²/ 2*L²

To get the force we need to add first  Fₓ  and  Fy  

Fx + Fy  =  F₁

module of  F₁ = √ Fx² + Fy²    the direction will be the same as the diagonal of the square then:

F₁   =   √  ( K* q²/L² )²  +   ( K* q²/L² )²

F₁  =  √ 2  *  K*q²/L²

And now we add forces F₁   and F₄₅   to get the net force Fr on charge in point B.

The direction of Fr is the direction of the diagonal and is of rejection

the module is

Fr  =  F₁  *  F₄₅

Fr  =  √ 2  *  K*q²/L²  +   K*q²/ 2*L²

Fr  = ( √ 2 + 0,5 ) * K*q² /L²

K  =  9*10⁹  Nm²C²

Fr = 1.91 * 9*10⁹*q²/L²

We don´t know units of L and q

Answer:

The velocity after 1.5 s is 22.7 m/s downwards.

Explanation:

Initial velocity = - 8 m/s

acceleration, a = - 9.8 m/s2

time, t = 1.5 s

Use first equation of motion

v = u + at

v = - 8 - 9.8 x 1.5

v = - 8 - 14.7

v = - 22.7 m/s  

Thus, the velocity after 1.5 s is 22.7 m/s downwards.