Did the nazi ever win over 50 percent of there votes in election

Did you read that book?

Answer:

Afrikaner nationalism gained ground within a context of increasing urbanisation and secondary industrialisation during the period between the two world wars, as well as the continuing British imperial influence in South Africa.

Explanation:

Asa cultural and political phenomenon, a specifically ethnic nationalism and narrowly defined Afrikaner nationalism undoubtedly left its mark on twentieth-century South African history. This is about the only non controversial statement that can be made in connection with Afrikaner nationalism. There are differing interpretations concerning the origins of Afrikaner nationalism, its nature and content, the way in which it has been manufactured, and the precise correlation between Afrikaner nationalism and socio-economic developments.

It is also important that we do not see Afrikaner nationalism in isolation. In the rest of Africa, particularly from the 1950s onwards, a wave of black nationalism swept over the continent and led to the independence of many countries. Although Afrikaner nationalism differed from black nationalism in many respects, it also displayed some similar characteristics. It shared, for example, the idea that foreign powers should not be allowed to dominate local populations.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Cassius foreshadows defeat for his army in the war. Cassius foreshadows defeat for his army in the war.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

URL copied to clipboard

As the one hundredth anniversary of the beginning of World War I approaches, one may encounter some rather strained attempts to compare the current global balance of forces to that in Europe in 1914. I recently visited several countries in south east Asia and a different comparison struck me, the similarities between now and the 1930s, weak democracies and strong dictatorships.

This comparison “jumped off the page” after a week in Bangkok, followed by several days in Hanoi - a journey from a country with weak and faltering formal democratic institutions to an apparently stable one with an authoritarian regime (bordering on a country with a considerably more brutal dictatorship, China).

In The Age of Extremes, Eric Hobsbawm argued that the conflict between capitalism and communism determined the course of the twentieth century.  This confrontation of socio-economic ideologies without doubt dominated European and global history, especially after 1945.  But another, inter-related confrontation that determined the course of the century was authoritarianism versus democracy. The capitalism-communism conflict seems but a moment of history for people in their forties and younger. However, the danger of a rising authoritarian wave is as imminent in the twenty-first century as it was in the twentieth.

In most countries of Europe in the 1930s the contest between authoritarian and democratic visions of society dominated the political struggle. The exceptions were Italy where the fascists had already established an extreme version of authoritarian rule, and Britain where a rigid class structure gave stability to superficially democratic institutions. By the middle of the decade, capitalist authoritarian regimes were clearly on the rise in Germany and much of central and eastern Europe (e.g., Hungary and Poland), as well as Portugal, with Spain soon to join the anti-democratic camp.

Indeed, in very few of the industrialised countries in the late 1930s did democracy seem the stronger trend. Among the large countries only in the United States was there an unambiguous shift towards strengthening popular participation. Ironically enough it was during the presidency of patrician Franklin D Roosevelt that trade unions asserted themselves as a major political force (which would not survive much past mid-century).

Now, well into the twenty-first century it is even more difficult to find a major country with vigorous and democratic institutions, certainly not in the United States nor in Europe. In the United States the confrontation between a well-funded right wing Republican Party and the middle-of-the road Democrat Party dominates politics, one doctrinaire and aggressive, the other muddled and vascillating. The anti-democratic trend is demonstrated by passage of laws restricting the right to vote in Republican controlled states, linked to the racist xenophobia of the Tea Party. In the White House sits a Democrat apparently unconcerned by a massively intrusive national security complex.

In Europe anti-democratic trends are if anything stronger. Britain probably has the most extensive video surveillance network in Europe (see recent articles in the Guardian), as well as legal restrictions on the right of assembly, designed to reduce public protests (as we find in Spain). In addition, the Conservative-dominated coalition government’s brutal attack on poor households receiving social support in effect legalises civil rights violations. Surveillance, attacks on the poor and the government fanning fears of immigrants combine to make a potent anti-democratic package.

On the continent pre-existing authoritarian tendencies enjoyed a quantum leap under the EU-wide austerity regime fostered by the German government under the cover of the European Commission. The unelected governments in Greece (2011-12) and Italy (2011-13) represent the most obvious and shocking examples of the authoritarian trend.  Much more serious in the long term is the EU fiscal compact (officially named the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union).

This treaty, which came into effect at the beginning of 2013, severely limits the authority of national parliaments to set fiscal policy. The treaty and additional measures demanded by the German government remove fiscal policy from public control (with monetary policy in the hands of the European Central Bank and beyond national accountability). This process in which major decisions are taken away from the electorate fundamentally undermines public faith in the democratic process.

Explanation:

Authoritarian governments were able to flourish in the 1920s because democratic governments were failing especially in the late 1920s and early 1930s. On top of that socialism was spreading which scared many people and authoritarianism seemed like a better option than democracy for stopping socialism.

Authoritarian government is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government.

Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military. States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have sometimes been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.

Minimally defined, an authoritarian government lacks free and competitive direct elections to legislatures, free and competitive direct or indirect elections for executives, or both.

Learn more about authoritarian, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30019371

#SPJ2

Slaves from other colonies ran away to Georgia.

Being a slave, who is unable to leave the duty they are performing for an enslaver and who is treated as the enslaver's property, is both the state and the condition of being an enslaved person.

Slavery was practiced in many different ways throughout historical Africa, including debt slavery, the enslavement of prisoners of war, military slavery, slavery for prostitution, and the enslavement of criminals. Slavery was frequently used in Africa for household and legal purposes.

To know more about slavery refer to :

https://brainly.com/question/16809902

#SPJ2

Answer:

People attend churches. The church building is a geographical location that provides sanctuary.

Biblically, there is a specified design for how a holy sanctuary should look like. This is found in the Good Book from the 25th Chapter of Exodus to the 31st.

It is clear, however, that over the course of history,  those recommendations have been modified.

These changes, some mostly triggered by the radical liturgical activities of the Second Vatican Council, the Catholic Church (which holds Church Building Architecture with utmost reverence and importance) has found it greatly challenging to adopt a newer and better standard architecturally to express its Mass.

For the Catholic church, it is important that the geographical location has a sense of sanctity and sacredness which will serve to enhance the unique spiritual experience of the Catholic Mass.

The above being said, the architectural devices of the church that exude space and a sense of sacredness works together with the liturgical processes to create evoke or amplify an emotional response.

The emotional response in this case relates to the connection between the church attendee and the sacredness they have come to want to achieve.

Cheers

Answer:

Some of the most important aspects of a capitalist system are private property, private control of the factors of production, accumulation of capital, and competition. Put simply, a capitalist system is controlled by market forces, while a communist system is controlled by the government.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you did not attach the options for this question.

Without the options, we can only answer with a term that can make sense, although it could not be part of the original options.

However, trying to help, we can comment on the following.

The development of intensive agriculture triggered the first appearance of cities and the emergence of civilization. This occurred because the vast increase in food production enabled by intensive agriculture provided support for human early civilizations to be established.

That was the case of the oldest civilization on planet earth: the Sumerians. It was also the case of other ancient civilizations such as ancient Egypt, the Indus Valley Civilization, and ancient China.

The Neolithic Revolution, also known as the Agriculture Revolution, was the time in human history when humans stopped being Nomads and started to settle in one place to establish the firsts civilizations, as was the case of the Sumerians, the oldest civilization on Earth. The Sumerians settled in the middle of the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers, in the Middle East.

They developed agriculture techniques, learned to benefit from the flood of the rivers to have fertile soil and grow crops, planted seeds, domesticated animals, produce a surplus of food, and established powerful city-states such as Nippur, Eridu, Lagash, Kish, Uruk, and Ur.

Answer: We are unable to use scientific methods to date these ancient wrappings

Explanation:

There are various ways an archeologist can use to date an ancient artifact or fossil and one of them is to date the wrappings the fossil was covered in using scientific methods.

One such method involves the use of microscopic analysis of the wrapping to find out how long it has been decaying for. This will show the date that these wrappings were applied because they were freshly used when first applied.

Answer:

Tobacco farming changed the settlement at Jamestown in many ways like- tobacco farming saved Jamestown by ensuring its economic success by becoming the colony's cash crop. As it required lots of land and labor, it sped up the growth of the colony.

Answer:

Animalism and the creation of "Animal Farm" presented a policy of equality for all individuals, where everyone should work for the common good, which should be available to all members of the community in an equal way. Communism and the rise of the Soviet Union presented this same policy, but like animalism and the "Animal Farm" it did not distribute the common good with equality among the members, but promoted the exploitation of some members to promote the privilege of other members.

Explanation:

"Animal farm" is the title of the fable written by George Orwell. In this fable we are introduced to a farm, where animals take over and expel humans because they are tired of being exploited. Soon after, animals create an animalism, a kind of political system that states that all animals are equal and will be treated that way in the farm, because everyone would work in it to promote privileges to each other in an equal way. However, over time, we can see that this "equality" among animals is not true, as many animals continue to be exploited by a small portion of animals that have many privileges that are not available to all animals equally.

The rise of the Soviet Union is similar to this, as this rise happened with the hard work of individuals who believed they would live in an egalitarian country, since the communism established in the country precluded the end of the private institution and the equal distribution of the common good to all citizens. However, what happened was the exploitation of workers to maintain an extremely privileged and overvalued class.

Answer:

Well it would be called an animal farm because of the animals being held hostage

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

They are incorrect its D

Explanation:

Answer:

the adaptation of a plant or animal from a wild or natural state (as by selective breeding) to life in close association with humans Wild and feral dogs are hunters, but domestication and differential breeding have modified breed and individual predatory motivation.

Answer:

rulers, nobles, and peasants.

Explanation:

Who made up the highest and lowest level of society in Europe during the 1400s?

The correct answer is False

Explanation

The word "subjective" is a concept that refers to the opinion or point of view of a person or group on a specific topic. While the word "objective" is a concept that refers to information or knowledge that does not include the opinion or point of view of its author, but rather focuses on the nature of a specific topic in general and specific. According to the above, the correct answer is false because subjective measures are not numerical or quantifiable but refer to an opinion or point of view and perceptions, while objective measures are not based on someone's perceptions but rather refer to numeric or quantifiable information.

Answer:

COUNT function

Explanation:

The COUNT function counts the number of cells that contain numbers, and counts numbers within the list of arguments. Use the COUNT function to get the number of entries in a number field that is in a range or array of numbers.

Answer:Columbus thought the american indians would be "great workers" in other words slaves

Explanation:

He would sell the natives into slavery (which most died before he could). If they were not sold into slavery he would put them to work to look for gold in mines and work on plantations.

Answer:

I think it was the Battle of Okinawa C.

I hope this helps!

Answer:

A) The U.S.  built the Panama Canal as to make the trip from the East Coast to the West Coast, take half the time as before, where boats had to traval raount the south and north american continent.

B) American Minorites helped the fight both on the homelines and battle feilds, albiet lower stations for each, withe mixed feeling a and reservations, but genrallly supportive of the U.S."s goal. Segration was still being used at the time, and push back to the unfair sytem started to gain, partly becuase of the above feelings coming with relization.

Explanation:

i started these with a single point and only one sentence to help start the answers and (hopefully) lead in the right direction, i also put some links to sources i used which you might want to check out since i found them informative. As always make sure to back through your lessons and readings so you dont miss anything and can get closer to the ansew your teacher miht want/expect. Also please do not copy-cut- and paste the above answers, reword.

history. delaware.gov/world-war-i/african-americans(dashww1/

www. brandeis.edu/now/2014/july/worldwar(dot)html (best one, but try to skim through them all)

www. reference.com/history/did-united-states-want-build-panama-canal272a7766e3f669d5#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20wanted%20to,less%20than%20half%20the%20time.

Answer:

1st Reconnaissance Squadron; Fort Sill, Oklahoma

Explanation:

The facts don't lie, and this is history.

Could you give me brainliest please?

Answer:

caballus, were brought back to North America, first in the Virgin Islands, and, in 1519, they were reintroduced on the continent, in modern-day Mexico, from where they radiated throughout the American Great Plains, after escape from their owners or by pilfering (Fazio 1995)

Answer:

Tojo

Explanation:

When he returned to his homeland,Tojo asaumed the office of vice minister of war and quickly took the lead in the militarys

Upon his return to his own country, Tojo accepted the position of deputy minister of war and immediately assumed command of the military.

Hideki Tojo, a Japanese politician, commander of the Imperial Japanese Army, and war criminal who presided over the Imperial Rule Assistance Association throughout the majority of World War II, was born on December 30, 1884, and died on December 23, 1948.

Before finally losing his position of authority in July 1944, he held a number of further jobs, including chief of staff of the Imperial Army. Extreme state-sanctioned violence committed in the name of Japanese ultranationalism throughout his time in office, most of which he personally participated in, was a defining characteristic of his leadership. On December 30, 1884, a former samurai family of relatively low status gave birth to Hideki in Tokyo's Kjimachi neighborhood.

Learn more about Hideki Tojo here:

https://brainly.com/question/9647864

#SPJ7

Answer:

(A) To help newly freed slaved establish schools and settle disputes

I think that this is the answer

Answer:

(A) To help newly freed slaves establish schools and settle disputes

Explanation:

The Bureau also took up the fight for African American education, establishing scores of public schools where freed people and poor whites could receive both elementary and higher education.

The  statement that explains one method the Roman Catholic Church used to unify Europe after the Roman empire collapsed is B.It brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam.

It should be noted that the Catholic Church unified Europe socially through the continuing masses, as well as the holding baptisms and weddings, and caring for the sick.

However the  Catholic Church unified Europe politically  through the process of acting as a unifying "leader" for Christians and it can be considered as a place people could come to for help they needed and the Church would be there, hence considering the case above it brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam.

Therefore, option B is correct.

Learn more about Roman Catholic Church at:

https://brainly.com/question/3323129

#SPJ1

missing options:

A. It forced all Eastern Orthodox Christians to respect the pope’s authority.

B.It brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam.

C. It established the Code of Justinian as the official European legal system.

D. It required that Latin act as the official spoken language throughout Europe.

It brought European Christians together to combat the spread of Islam

Answer:

Negritude is the literary and intellectual movement that developed in Paris among the black writers in France. This movement was a sort of open declaration and acceptance of their black or African origin and their public expression of being accepted as Black writers.

Explanation:

The term "Negritude" refers to the literary movement during the early 19th century that originated in France. This literary movement was a result of the collected group of black writers and intellectuals banding together to raise concerns and cultivate their African identity and origin.

The concept of negritude developed first in Paris among the black or African writers and intellectuals who speak French and desired to express and openly declare their African origin. It was a result of their desire to be accepted and identified as black writers, their acceptance of their culture and identity. The movement was a sort of reaction against the European colonization of Africa and the need to assert the cultural racism that the Europeans had directed against the colonies.

Answer:

this is too much

Explanation: