Answer:
Yes , it satisfies the hypothesis and we can conclude that c = 1 is an element of [0,2]
c = 1 ∈ [0,2]
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
[tex]f(x) = 4x^2 -3x + 2, [0, 2][/tex]
which is read as the function of x = 4x² - 3x + 2 along the interval [0,2]
Differentiating the function with respect to x is;
f(x) = 8x - 3
Using the Mean value theorem to see if the function satisfies it, we have:
[tex]f'c = \dfrac{f(b)-f(a)}{b-a}[/tex]
[tex]8c -3 = \dfrac{f(2)-f(0)}{2-0}[/tex]
since the polynomial function is differentiated in [0,2]
[tex]8c -3 = \dfrac{(4(2)^2-3(2)+2)-(4(0)^2-3(0)+2)}{2-0}[/tex]
[tex]8c -3 = \dfrac{(4(4)-3(2)+2)-(4(0)-3(0)+2)}{2-0}[/tex]
[tex]8c -3 = \dfrac{(16-6+2)-(0-0+2)}{2-0}[/tex]
[tex]8c -3 = \dfrac{(12)-(2)}{2}[/tex]
[tex]8c -3 = \dfrac{10}{2}[/tex]
8c -3 = 5
8c = 5+3
8c = 8
c = 8/8
c = 1
Therefore, we can conclude that c = 1 is an element of [0,2]
c = 1 ∈ [0,2]
This graph shows the US unemployment rate from August 2010 to November 2011.
Sample Unemployment Rate
Graph
Unemployment Rate
10%
80%
6%
Unemployment Rate
Aug 10
Jan 11
Jun 11
Nov 11
This graph suggests unemployment in the United States
O will continue to fall.
O will continue to rise.
O will remain the same.
O will only change a little.
Answer: Will continue to rise
Step-by-step explanation:
Looking at the graph one notices that after a slight dip in the unemployment rate from August 2010 to January 2011, the unemployment rate began to rise and by November 2011 was still rising.
The arrow on the graph serves to indicate the direction the unemployment rate is going and as it is pointing upwards, this means that the Unemployment rate will continue to rise.
This was down to the fact that in 2011 the US was still yet to recover from the Great Recession of 2008 - 2009.
Answer:
EDGE 2021
Step-by-step explanation:
1) 4%
2) Increase
You sell tickets at school for fundraisers. You sold car wash tickets, silly string fight tickets and dance tickets – for a total of 380 tickets sold. The car wash tickets were $5 each, the silly sting fight tickets were $3 each and the dance tickets were $10 each. If you sold twice as many silly string tickets as car wash tickets, and you have $1460 total. Write the matrix in the box below. Write the solution set for this system and include any necessary work.
Answer:
Matrix :
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}1&1&1&|&380\\ 5&3&10&|&1460\\ -2&1&0&|&0\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
Solution Set : { x = 123, y = 246, z = 11 }
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's say that x represents the number of car wash tickets, y represents the number of silly sting fight tickets, and z represents the number of dance tickets. We know that the total tickets = 380, so therefore,
x + y + z = 380,
And the car wash tickets were $5 each, the silly sting fight tickets were $3 each and the dance tickets were $10 each, the total cost being $1460.
5x + 3y + 10z = 1460
The silly string tickets were sold for twice as much as the car wash tickets.
y = 2x
Therefore, if we allign the co - efficients of the following system of equations, we get it's respective matrix.
System of Equations :
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}x+y+z=380\\ 5x+3y+10z=1460\\ y=2x\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
Matrix :
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}1&1&1&|&380\\ 5&3&10&|&1460\\ -2&1&0&|&0\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
Let's reduce this matrix to row - echelon form, receiving the number of car wash tickets, silly sting fight tickets, and dance tickets,
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}5&3&10&1460\\ 1&1&1&380\\ -2&1&0&0\end{bmatrix}[/tex] - Swap Matrix Rows
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}5&3&10&1460\\ 0&\frac{2}{5}&-1&88\\ -2&1&0&0\end{bmatrix}[/tex] - Cancel leading Co - efficient in second row
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}5&3&10&1460\\ 0&\frac{2}{5}&-1&88\\ 0&\frac{11}{5}&4&584\end{bmatrix}[/tex] - Cancel leading Co - efficient in third row
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}5&3&10&1460\\ 0&\frac{11}{5}&4&584\\ 0&\frac{2}{5}&-1&88\end{bmatrix}[/tex] - Swap second and third rows
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}5&3&10&1460\\ 0&\frac{11}{5}&4&584\\ 0&0&-\frac{19}{11}&-\frac{200}{11}\end{bmatrix}[/tex] - Cancel leading co - efficient in row three
And we can continue, canceling the leading co - efficient in each row until this matrix remains,
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}1&0&0&|&\frac{2340}{19}\\ 0&1&0&|&\frac{4680}{19}\\ 0&0&1&|&\frac{200}{19}\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
x = 2340 / 19 = ( About ) 123 car wash tickets sold, y= 4680 / 19 =( About ) 246 silly string fight tickets sold, z = 200 / 19 = ( About ) 11 tickets sold
Can someone explain to me what a “derivative” means? How do you find the derivative of f(x)=x^3+1?
Gina, Sam, and Robby all rented movies from the same video store. They each rented some dramas, comedies, and documentaries. Gina rented 11 movies total. Sam rented twice as many dramas, three times as many comedies, and twice as many documentaries as Gina. He rented 27 movies total. If Robby rented 19 movies total with the same number of dramas, twice as many comedies, and twice as many documentaries as Gina, how many movies of each type did Gina rent?
Hi there! :)
Answer:
Gina rented 3 dramas, 5 comedies, and 3 documentaries.
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve, we will need to set up a system of equations:
Let x = # of dramas, y = # of comedies, and z = # of documentaries:
Write equations to represent each person:
Gina:
x + y + z = 11
Sam:
2x + 3y + 2z = 27
Robby:
x + 2y + 2z = 19
Write the system:
x + y + z = 11
2x + 3y + 2z = 27
x + 2y + 2z = 19
Begin by subtracting the third equation from the second:
2x + 3y + 2z = 27
x + 2y + 2z = 19
-----------------------
x + y = 8
If x + y = 8, plug this into the first equation:
(8) + z = 11
z = 11 - 8
z = 3
We found the # of documentaries Gina rented, now we must solve for the other variables:
Subtract the top equation from the third. Substitute in the value of z we solved for:
x + 2y + 2(3) = 19
x + y + (3) = 11
-------------------------
y + 3 = 8
y = 5
Substitute in the values for y and z to solve for x:
x + 5 + 3 = 11
x + 8 = 11
x = 11 - 8
x = 3.
Therefore, Gina rented 3 dramas, 5 comedies, and 3 documentaries.
Answer:
B- x + y + z = 11
2x + 3y + 2z = 27
x + 2y + 2z = 19
Step-by-step explanation:
I took the quiz
In the following equation, when x=3, what is the value of y? -4x + 3y = 12 A. 9 B. 3 C. 0 D. 8 PLZ HURRY IM TIMED WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
Answer:
[tex]\huge\boxed{y = 8}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
-4x + 3y = 12
Given that x = 3
-4 (3) + 3y = 12
-12 + 3y = 12
Adding 12 to both sides
3y = 12+12
3y = 24
Dividing both sides by 3
y = 8
Answer:
y =8
Step-by-step explanation:
-4x + 3y = 12
Let x = 3
-4(3) +3y = 12
-12+3y = 12
Add 12 to each side
-12+12+3y =12+12
3y =24
Divide each side by 3
3y/3 = 24/3
y =8
what are the comparison symbols for 5/6 and 2/5, 4/10 and 7/8, and 3/12 and 1/4
Answer like this: Example
=
<
>
Answer:
5/6 > 2/44/10 < 7/83/12 = 1/4Step-by-step explanation:
The comparison will be the same if you subtract the right side and compare to zero:
a/b ?? c/d . . . . . . . using ?? for the unknown comparison symbol
a/b - c/d ?? 0 . . . . subtract the fraction on the right
(ad -bc)/bd ?? 0 . . . combine the two fractions
ad - bc ?? 0 . . . . . . multiply by bd to make the job easier
__
5/6 and 2/5
5(5) -6(2) = 25 -12 > 0 ⇒ 5/6 > 2/5
4/10 and 7/8
4(8) -10(7) = 48 - 70 < 0 ⇒ 4/10 < 7/8
3/12 and 1/4
3(4) -12(1) = 0 ⇒ 3/12 = 1/4
_____
Of course, you can use your calculator (or your memory) to change each of these to a decimal equivalent. The comparison should be easy at that point.
0.833 > 0.400
0.400 < 0.875
0.250 = 0.250
nick cut a circular cookie into 5 equal slices. what is the angle measure of each slice?
Using concepts of circles, it is found that the angle measure of each slice is of 72º.
--------------------------------------------
The cookies have circular formats.A complete circle, which is the format of a cookie, has an angular measure of 360º.If it is divided into a number n of equal slices, the angles will be 360 divided by n.--------------------------------------------
5 equal slices, thus:
[tex]\frac{360}{5} = 72[/tex]
The angle measure of each slice is of 72º.
A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/16746988
Which is a perfect square? 6 Superscript 1 6 squared 6 cubed 6 Superscript 5 What is the length of the hypotenuse, x, if (20, 21, x) is a Pythagorean triple
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello, by definition a perfect square can be written as [tex]a^2[/tex] where a in a positive integer.
So, to answer the first question, [tex]6^2[/tex] is a perfect square.
(a,b,c) is a Pythagorean triple means the following
[tex]a^2+b^2=c^2[/tex]
Here, it means that
[tex]x^2=20^2+21^2=841=29^2 \ \ \ so\\\\x=29[/tex]
Thank you.
Answer:
Its B
Step-by-step explanation:
can you please help ?
Answer:
69
Step-by-step explanation:
The order of operations is PEMDAS; parentheses, exponents, multiplication and division, and finally addition and subtraction.
We know that x is the first row, and if there are 30 spots in the first row, then x=30. Using this information, all we have to do now is plug in 30 for x and solve.
[tex]\frac{5(x)}{2} -6[/tex]
[tex]\frac{5(30)}{2}-6[/tex]
[tex]\frac{150}{2}-6[/tex]
[tex]75-6[/tex]
[tex]69[/tex]
Let f(x)=x+8 and g(x)= x2-6x-7 find f(g2)
Answer:
-7.
Step-by-step explanation:
g(x) = x^2 - 6x - 7
g(2) = 2^2 - 6(2) - 7
= 4 - 12 - 7
= -8 - 7
= -15
f(x) = x + 8
f(-15) = (-15) + 8
= 8 - 15
= -7
Hope this helps!
A maker of microwave ovens advertises that no more than 10% of its microwaves need repair during the first 5 years of use. In a random sample of 50 microwaves that are 5 years old, 12% needed repairs at a=.04 can you reject the makers claim that no more than 10% of its microwaves need repair during the first five years of use?
Answer:
We conclude that no more than 10% of its microwaves need repair during the first five years of use.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that a maker of microwave ovens advertises that no more than 10% of its microwaves need repair during the first 5 years of use.
In a random sample of 50 microwaves that are 5 years old, 12% needed repairs.
Let p = population proportion of microwaves who need repair during the first five years of use.
So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : p [tex]\leq[/tex] 10% {means that no more than 10% of its microwaves need repair during the first five years of use}
Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_A[/tex] : p > 10% {means that more than 10% of its microwaves need repair during the first five years of use}
The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample z-test for proportions;
T.S. = [tex]\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n} } }[/tex] ~ N(0,1)
where, [tex]\hat p[/tex] = sample proportion of microwaves who need repair during the first 5 years of use = 12%
n = sample of microwaves = 50
So, the test statistics = [tex]\frac{0.12-0.10}{\sqrt{\frac{0.10(1-0.10)}{50} } }[/tex]
= 0.471
The value of z-test statistics is 0.471.
Now, at a 0.04 level of significance, the z table gives a critical value of 1.751 for the right-tailed test.
Since the value of our test statistics is less than the critical value of z as 0.471 < 1.751, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as the test statistics will not fall in the rejection region.
Therefore, we conclude that no more than 10% of its microwaves need repair during the first five years of use.
The range of values for x?
Answer:
x = 32
but
I would say anything from 30 to 33
but truly i have no clue about the range
Step-by-step explanation:
3x-9=87 (because 180 -93 =87)
3x = 96
x = 32
Answer:
it is 32
Step-by-step explanation:
12-(3-9) 3*3 help please
Step-by-step explanation:
42 is your answer according to bodmas
find the value of x? please help
Answer:
49
Step-by-step explanation:
With these types of problems, you have to subtract the outer and inner values and then divide by 2. So, (125-27)/2 = 49. Hope this helps!
6x - 10 = 4(x + 3) x = ? x = 9 x = 10 x = 11 x = 12
Answer:
x=11
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x = 11
Step-by-step explanation:
6x - 10 = 4(x+3)
6x - 10 = 4*x + 4*3
6x - 10 = 4x + 12
6x - 4x = 12 + 10
2x = 22
x = 22/2
x = 11
check:
6*11 - 10 = 4(11+3)
66 - 10 = 4*14 = 56
A cardboard box without a lid is to be made with a volume of 4 ft 3 . Find the dimensions of the box that requires the least amount of cardboard.
Answer:
2ft by 2ft by 1 ftStep-by-step explanation:
Total surface of the cardboard box is expressed as S = 2LW + 2WH + 2LH where L is the length of the box, W is the width and H is the height of the box. Since the cardboard box is without a lid, then the total surface area will be expressed as;
S = lw+2wh+2lh ... 1
Given the volume V = lwh = 4ft³ ... 2
From equation 2;
h = 4/lw
Substituting into r[equation 1;
S = lw + 2w(4/lw)+ 2l(4/lw)
S = lw+8/l+8/w
Differentiating the resulting equation with respect to w and l will give;
dS/dw = l + (-8w⁻²)
dS/dw = l - 8/w²
Similarly,
dS/dl = w + (-8l⁻²)
dS/dw = w - 8/l²
At turning point, ds/dw = 0 and ds/dl = 0
l - 8/w² = 0 and w - 8/l² = 0
l = 8/w² and w =8/l²
l = 8/(8/l² )²
l = 8/(64/I⁴)
l = 8*l⁴/64
l = l⁴/8
8l = l⁴
l³ = 8
l = ∛8
l = 2
Hence the length of the box is 2 feet
Substituting l = 2 into the function l = 8/w² to get the eidth w
2 = 8/w²
1 = 4/w²
w² = 4
w = 2 ft
width of the cardboard is 2 ft
Since Volume = lwh
4 = 2(2)h
4 = 4h
h = 1 ft
Height of the cardboard is 1 ft
The dimensions of the box that requires the least amount of cardboard is 2ft by 2ft by 1 ft
An evergreen nursery usually sells a certain shrub after 9 years of growth and shaping. The growth rate during those 9 years is approximated by
dh/dt = 1.8t + 3,
where t is the time (in years) and h is the height (in centimeters). The seedlings are 10 centimeters tall when planted (t = 0).
(a) Find the height after t years.
h(t) =
(b) How tall are the shrubs when they are sold?
cm
Answer:
(a) After t years, the height is
18t² + 3t + 10
(b) The shrubs are847 cm tall when they are sold.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given growth rate
dh/dt = 1.8t + 3
dh = (18t + 3)dt
Integrating this, we have
h = 18t² + 3t + C
When t = 0, h = 10cm
Then
10 = C
So
(a) h = 18t² + 3t + 10
(b) Because they are sold after every 9 years, then at t = 9
h = 18(9)² + 3(9) + 10
= 810 + 27 + 10
= 847 cm
Find the area of the shaded regions:
area of Arc subtending [tex]360^{\circ}[/tex] (i.e. the whole circle) is $\pi r^2$
so area of Arc subtending $\theta^{\circ}$ is, $\frac{ \pi r^2}{360^{\circ}}\times \theta^{\circ}$
$\theta =72^{\circ}$ so the area enclosed by one such arc is $\frac{\pi (10)^272}{360}$
abd there are 2 such arcs, so double the area.
[tex] \LARGE{ \underline{ \boxed{ \rm{ \purple{Solution}}}}}[/tex]
Given:-Radius of the circle = 10 inchesAngle of each sector = 72°Number of sectors = 2To FinD:-Find the area of the shaded regions....?How to solve?For solving this question, Let's know how to find the area of a sector in a circle?
[tex] \large{ \boxed{ \rm{area \: of \: sector = \frac{\theta}{360} \times \pi {r}^{2} }}}[/tex]
Here, Θ is the angle of sector and r is the radius of the circle. So, let's solve this question.
Solution:-We have,
No. of sectors = 2Angle of sector = 72°By using formula,
⇛ Area of shaded region = 2 × Area of each sector
⇛ Area of shaded region = 2 × Θ/360° × πr²
⇛ Area of shaded region = 2 × 72°/360° × 22/7 × 10²
⇛ Area of shaded region = 2/5 × 100 × 22/7
⇛ Area of shaded region = 40 × 22/7
⇛ Area of shaded region = 880/7 inch. sq.
⇛ Area of shaded region = 125.71 inch. sq.
☄ Your Required answer is 125.71 inch. sq(approx.)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
What is the first step in mathematical induction?
Answer:
Show that the statement is true for n=1
Step-by-step explanation:
Hey,
Show that the statement is true for n=1
You can check my other answer there which explains a little bit more the ideas.
https://brainly.com/question/17162256
thank you
The chief business officer of a construction equipment company arranges a loan of $9,300, at 12 1 /8 % interest for 37.5 months. Find the amount of interest. (Round to the nearest cent)
a. $2,761.21
b. $3,583.83
c. $3,523.83
d. $3,722.47
Answer:
C). $3523.83
Step-by-step explanation:
loan of principles p= $9,300,
at rate R= 12 1 /8 % interest
Rate R = 12.125%
for duration year T = 37.5 months
T= 37.5/12 = 3.125 years
Interest I=PRT/100
Interest I =( 9300*12.125*3.125)/100
Interest I = (352382.8125)/100
Interest I = 3523.83
Interest I= $3523.83
The MCAT is the admission exam that medical schools use as one of the criteria for accepting students. The exam is based on a scale of 0-45. The following data shows the MCAT scores for nine students.
32 36 29 31 30 35 34 26 30
The 35th percentile of this data set is:________
a. 31
b. 32
c. 31.5
d. 30
Answer:
d. 30
Step-by-step explanation:
The computation of the 35th percentile of this data set is shown below:
Before that first we have to series the number in ascending number
S. No Numbers
1 26
2 29
3 30
4 30
5 31
6 32
7 34
8 35
9 36
Now use the formula
Here n = 9
Percentile = 100
[tex]= \frac{35(9 + 1)}{100} \\\\[/tex]
= 3.5th
= 3th + 0.5 (4th - 3th)
= 3th + 0.5 (30 - 30)
= 3th + 0
= 30
As a bowling instructor, you calculate your students' averages during tournaments. In 5 games, one bowler had the following scores: 143, 156, 172, 133, and 167. What was that bowler's average?
Answer:
154.2
Step-by-step explanation:
143 plus
156 plus
172 plus
133 plus
167 = 771
divide by 5 equals 154.2
How many times does 1/4 go into 3/8
Answer:
3/2
Step-by-step explanation:
3/8 ÷ 1/4
Copy dot flip
3/8 * 4/1
12/8
Divide top and bottom by 4
3/2
16
Select the correct answer.
If function g is defined by the equation Y-3X = -14, which equation represents the function in function notation?
OA. gx) = 3X - 14
OB. gx) = -3X - 14
OC. g(x) = 3X + 14
OD. gx) = -3X + 14
Reset
Next
Answer: A) g(x) = 3x - 14
Step-by-step explanation:
Solve the equation for y and replace y with g(x):
y - 3x = -14
y = 3x - 14
g(x) = 3x - 14
Suppose you are standing such that a 32-foot tree is directly between you and the sun. If you are standing 140 feet away from the tree and the tree casts a 160-foot shadow, how tall could you be and still be completely in the shadow of the tree? x 160 ft 140 ft 32 ft
Answer:
Height = 4 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine how tall I can be we take the difference between the shadow cast by the 32-feet tree and the distance away from the tree
But the tree is 32 feet tall but on shadow it's 160
So lemme determine how long I'll be in my shadow first
Distance away from tree= 140 feet
Length of shadow cast by tree
= 160 feet
Length of shadow= 160-140
Length if shadow= 20 feet
My height= x
X/20= 32/160
X= 20*32/260
X = 4 feet
Height = 4 feet
Your investment club has only two stocks in its portfolio. $25,000 is invested in a stock with a beta of 0.8, and $40,000 is invested in a stock with a beta of 1.7. What is the portfolio's beta? Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to two decimal places.
Answer:
The portfolio beta is [tex]\alpha = 1.354[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The first investment is [tex]i_1 = \$ 25,000[/tex]
The first beta is [tex]k = 0.8[/tex]
The second investment is [tex]i_2 = \$ 40,000[/tex]
The second beta is [tex]w = 1.7[/tex]
Generally the portfolio beta is mathematically represented as
[tex]\alpha = \frac{ i_1 * k + i_2 * w }{ i_1 + i_2}[/tex]
substituting values
[tex]\alpha = \frac{ (25000 * 0.8) + ( 40000* 1.7 ) }{40000 + 25000}[/tex]
[tex]\alpha = 1.354[/tex]
solve for x: 5x+3+8x-4=90
Answer:
[tex]x = 7[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
We can solve the equation [tex]5x+3+8x-4=90[/tex] by isolating the variable x on one side. To do this, we must simplify the equation.
[tex]5x+3+8x-4=90[/tex]
Combine like terms:
[tex]13x - 1 = 90[/tex]
Add 1 to both sides:
[tex]13x = 91[/tex]
Divide both sides by 13:
[tex]x = 7[/tex]
Hope this helped!
Answer:
x = 7
Step-by-step exxplanation:
5x + 3 + 8x - 4 = 90
5x + 8x = 90 - 3 + 4
13x = 91
x = 91/13
x = 7
probe:
5*7 + 3 + 8*7 - 4 = 90
35 + 3 + 56 - 4 = 90
Variable g is 8 more than variable w. Variable g is also 2 less than w. Which pair of equations best models the relationship between g and w? g = 8w g = w + 2 w = g + 8 w = g − 2 w = 8g w = g + 2 g = w + 8 g = w − 2
Answer: g = w + 8 g=w-2
Step-by-step explanation:
We could represent the word phrases by the equations.
g = w + 8
g = w - 2
Answer:
g = w + 8
g = w - 2
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming that g and w exists, then we can show the relation as described:
"Variable g is 8 more than variable w."
g = w + 8
"Variable g is also 2 less than w."
g = w - 2
These are the two equations of the described relationship between g and w.
Note that g could not actually exist in the real number system:
g = w + 8
g = w - 2
w + 8 = w - 2
w - w = -2 - 8
0 != -10
This is impossible within the real number system.
Cheers.
Determine which is the appropriate approach for conducting a hypothesis test. Claim: The mean RDA of sodium is 2400mg. Sample data: n150, 3400, s550. The sample data appear to come from a normally distributed population.
Answer:
Use the student t distribution
Step-by-step explanation:
Here is the formula
t = (x - u) ÷(s/√N)
From the information we have in the question:
n = 150
s = 550
x = 3400
u = mean = 2400
= 3400 - 2400÷ 500/√150
= 1000/44.9
= 22.27
At 0.05 significance level, df = 149 so t tabulated will be 1.65.
We cannot use normal distribution since we do not have population standard deviationWe cannot use normal distribution since we do not have population standard deviationChisquare cannot be used since we are not testing for population varianceWe cannot use normal distribution since we do not have population standard deviationChisquare cannot be used since we are not testing for population varianceThe parametric or bootstrap method cannot be used either.A standardized exam's scores are normally distributed. In a recent year, the mean test score was and the standard deviation was . The test scores of four students selected at random are , , , and . Find the z-scores that correspond to each value and determine whether any of the values are unusual. The z-score for is nothing. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) The z-score for is nothing. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) The z-score for is nothing. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) The z-score for is nothing. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Which values, if any, are unusual? Select the correct choice below and, if necessary, fill in the answer box within your choice. A. The unusual value(s) is/are nothing. (Use a comma to separate answers as needed.) B. None of the values are unusual.
Answer:
The z-score for 1880 is 1.34.
The z-score for 1190 is -0.88.
The z-score for 2130 is 2.15.
The z-score for 1350 is -0.37.
And the z-score of 2130 is considered to be unusual.
Step-by-step explanation:
The complete question is: A standardized exam's scores are normally distributed. In recent years, the mean test score was 1464 and the standard deviation was 310. The test scores of four students selected at random are 1880, 1190, 2130, and 1350. Find the z-scores that correspond to each value and determine whether any of the values are unusual. The z-score for 1880 is nothing. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) The z-score for 1190 is nothing. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) The z-score for 2130 is nothing. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) The z-score for 1350 is nothing. (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Which values, if any, are unusual? Select the correct choice below and, if necessary, fill in the answer box within your choice. A. The unusual value(s) is/are nothing. (Use a comma to separate answers as needed.) B. None of the values are unusual.
We are given that the mean test score was 1464 and the standard deviation was 310.
Let X = standardized exam's scores
The z-score probability distribution for the normal distribution is given by;
Z = [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex] ~ N(0,1)
where, [tex]\mu[/tex] = mean test score = 1464
[tex]\sigma[/tex] = standard deviation = 310
S, X ~ Normal([tex]\mu=1464, \sigma^{2} = 310^{2}[/tex])
Now, the test scores of four students selected at random are 1880, 1190, 2130, and 1350.
So, the z-score of 1880 = [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{1880-1464}{310}[/tex] = 1.34
The z-score of 1190 = [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{1190-1464}{310}[/tex] = -0.88
The z-score of 2130 = [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{2130-1464}{310}[/tex] = 2.15
The z-score of 1350 = [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]
= [tex]\frac{1350-1464}{310}[/tex] = -0.37
Now, the values whose z-score is less than -1.96 or higher than 1.96 are considered to be unusual.
According to our z-scores, only the z-score of 2130 is considered to be unusual as all other z-scores lie within the range of -1.96 and 1.96.
