The Constitution guarantees trial by jury during criminal cases. This is to prevent unfair treatment and to make sure that justice is served in all criminal cases.
During criminal cases, the Constitution of the United States of America ensures the right to a fair trial and guarantees a trial by jury. This means that individuals who are facing criminal charges will have their case heard in front of a jury of their peers rather than just a judge. The jury is tasked with examining the evidence presented in the case and reaching a verdict based on that evidence. This ensures that the defendant is not at the mercy of the judge and that they have a fair chance to defend themselves against any accusations that have been made.
The Constitution also ensures that all individuals have the right to be represented by an experienced lawyer to defend their rights and interests in court.
To know more about the criminal cases visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1769121
#SPJ11
what happened to the two men convicted of treason during the whiskey rebellion?
The Whiskey Rebellion was a 1791-1794 uprising in Western Pennsylvania and parts of the trans-Appalachian frontier. The rebellion started due to the Whiskey Tax imposed by the federal government on distilled spirits, which affected small farmers and whiskey producers.
During the Whiskey Rebellion, two men were convicted of treason. They were John Mitchell and Philip Weigel. Mitchell and Weigel had organized the meeting where the whiskey rebels formulated their complaints against the government. They were found guilty of treason against the United States in federal court on the grounds that they had conspired with the insurgents to levy war against the government.
After being convicted, John Mitchell and Philip Weigel were sentenced to hang. However, they were granted clemency by President George Washington in response to their lawyers' appeals and the intervention of influential members of the community, such as Supreme Court Justice James Wilson. Their sentences were commuted to house arrest. Both Mitchell and Weigel served six months in prison before being released and then placed under house arrest for a year after their release. The Whiskey Rebellion demonstrated the federal government's ability to maintain order and enforce its laws, while also highlighting the tensions between western farmers and the eastern political elite.
To know more about Whiskey Rebellion visit:
https://brainly.com/question/478473
#SPJ11
What was the impact of baseball and entertainment on america in the 1920’s?.
Baseball and entertainment played a significant role in shaping America's social, economic, and political landscape in the 1920s. It was a time when America was emerging from World War I, and there was a need for unity, social cohesion, and a sense of national identity.
Baseball was the most popular sport at the time, and it brought people together, regardless of their social, economic, or political background. It provided a sense of belonging, pride, and unity that was much needed at the time.
Entertainment was also a crucial aspect of American life in the 1920s. It was a time when people wanted to forget the hardships of the war years and enjoy life to the fullest. The popularity of jazz music, dance, and theater provided people with an escape from their everyday lives. Jazz music was the soundtrack of the 1920s, and it helped to bring people together. It was a symbol of cultural diversity and creativity.
baseball and entertainment had a significant impact on America in the 1920s. They helped to create a sense of national unity, pride, and identity. They also contributed to economic growth and provided people with an escape from the hardships of everyday life. Baseball and entertainment helped to shape the social, economic, and political landscape of America, and their impact can still be felt today.
To know more about social cohesion visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/9234996
#SPJ11
How was England perceived by the rest of the world in the late 19th century, during the height of imperialism?
a. As a benevolent and respectful colonial power
b. As an oppressive and exploitative empire
c. As an isolationist nation avoiding foreign affairs
d. As a neutral mediator in international conflicts
During the height of imperialism in the late 19th century, England was perceived by the rest of the world as an oppressive and exploitative empire. This can be seen in their actions towards the people of India and Africa. The correct answer is b).
During the late 19th century, imperialism became rampant and England was seen by the rest of the world as an oppressive and exploitative empire. They did not handle their colonies in a way that benefitted them, but instead exploited them for their resources.
In India, for example, England took advantage of the country's resources and treated the Indian people as second-class citizens. In Africa, England also acted in the same way, they exploited the natural resources of the continent and subjected the indigenous people to slavery, colonization, and racism.
Therefore, it can be concluded that during the late 19th century, England was seen as an oppressive and exploitative empire. The correct answer is b) As an oppressive and exploitative empire
Learn more about imperialism : brainly.com/question/377688
#SPJ11
During the late 19th century, which was also the height of imperialism, England was perceived by the rest of the world as an oppressive and exploitative empire.
This was due to the fact that during this time, England had an extensive colonial empire that included several territories in Africa, Asia, and the Caribbean. In order to maintain control over these colonies, England used its military and economic power to exploit their resources and subjugate their populations.Therefore, option B (As an oppressive and exploitative empire) is the correct answer. England was not seen as a benevolent or respectful colonial power, as the exploitation of the colonies was seen as an act of greed rather than a genuine desire to help them. Additionally, England was not seen as an isolationist nation or a neutral mediator, as it was heavily involved in international affairs due to its colonial holdings and its position as a global superpower at the time.
To know more about imperialism visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/30210572
#SPJ11
How does Mr. Frank feel about having Mr. Dussel with them? How does Mr. Van Daan
feel about it?