enter the number that belongs in the green box. m

Answer:

y=1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

SEESH thanks for the points

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The value of teh test statistic is [tex]z = 5.54[/tex]

The p-value of the test is 0 < 0.05, which means that there is significant evidence to conclude that the proportion differs from 0.2.

Step-by-step explanation:

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0.2 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.2, \sigma = \sqrt{0.2*0.8} = 0.4[/tex]

Using the sample results p^=0.27 with n=1003

This means that [tex]X = 0.27, n = 1003[/tex]

Value of the test statistic:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.27 - 0.2}{\frac{0.4}{\sqrt{1003}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = 5.54[/tex]

P-value of the test and decision:

The p-value of the test is the probability that the sample proportion differs from 0.2 by at least 0.07, which is P(|z| > 5.54), that is, 2 multiplied by the p-value of z = -5.54.

Looking at the z-table, z = -5.54 has a p-value of 0.

2*0 = 0.

The p-value of the test is 0 < 0.05, which means that there is significant evidence to conclude that the proportion differs from 0.2.

Answer:

[tex]P = 8 + 2\sqrt{26}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]W = (-2, 4)[/tex]

[tex]X = (2, 4)[/tex]

[tex]Y = (1, -1)[/tex]

[tex]Z = (-3,-1)[/tex]

Required

The perimeter

First, calculate the distance between each point using:

[tex]d = \sqrt{(x_1 - x_2)^2 + (y_1 -y_2)^2[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]WX = \sqrt{(-2- 2)^2 + (4-4)^2 } =4[/tex]

[tex]XY = \sqrt{(2- 1)^2 + (4--1)^2 } =\sqrt{26}[/tex]

[tex]YZ = \sqrt{(1- -3)^2 + (-1--1)^2 } =4[/tex]

[tex]ZW = \sqrt{(-3--2)^2 + (-1-4)^2 } =\sqrt{26}[/tex]

So, the perimeter (P) is:

[tex]P = 4 + \sqrt{26} + 4 + \sqrt{26}[/tex]

[tex]P = 8 + 2\sqrt{26}[/tex]

Answer:

its D.

Step-by-step explanation:

took test

Answer:

[tex]{ \bf{c). \: g(x) = {2}^{x} - 2 }}[/tex]

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer is C

the y intercept is +3

if you do rise over run, the slope will be 1/2

Answer:

See Explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the Question,

Thus,

The distance that you get reception is the length of the chord created by the intersection of the circle defining the edge of transmission and the line defining the car trip.

And,

The Transmitter at the origin

City to the north at (0,93)  & City to the east at (78,0)  

the Slope is M=(-93/78)

Intercept is B= y - mx ⇒  93 - (-93/78)(0) = 93

The equation of the line between the cities is y = (-93/78)x + 93

Now, Solve the above two Equations

The intersection is gotten from the picture or solving:

x^2 + [(-93/78)*x + 93]^2 = 69^2

Now,

From the Pythagorean theorem the total distance of the trip is:  

d1 = √(93^2 + 78^2) ≈ 121.37miles  

And the distance when the signal is picked up is:

d2 =√ [(67.952-23.627)^2 + (64.82 - 11.98)^2] ≈ 68.96 miles

You will pick up a signal from the transmitter in (d2/d1)*100 = 56% of the drive.

Answer:

71, 71, 75, 85, 98, 98, 104, 111, 114, 122, 164

The middle quartile is 98.

The lower quartile is 80

The upper quartile is 112.5

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to first find the model for this particular situation, knowing that this is an exponential decay problem. The main equation for exponential growth/decay (as far as population goes for our problem) is

[tex]y=a(b)^x[/tex] where a is the initial population, b is the rate of decrease in the population which can also be written as (1 - r), y is the population after a certain amount of time, x, goes by. We will let year 2015 = 0 so year 2021 can = 6. This keeps our numbers lower and doesn't change the answer!

Our initial population in the year x = 0 is 62500. Our rate of decay is

(1 - .016) so our b value is .984

Filling in to find our model:

[tex]y=62500(.984)^x[/tex]

Now we can use that model and sub in a 6 for x to find the population in the year 2021:

[tex]y=62500(.984)^6[/tex] and

y = 62500(.9077590568) so

y = 56734.9 or, rounded to the nearest person, 56735

Answer:

The alternative hypothesis is [tex]H_1: \mu_M - \mu_W \neq 0[/tex], considering M for men and W for women.

Step-by-step explanation:

He uses the data to conduct a hypothesis test to determine if the mean percent of expenditures that goes toward housing (including fuel and light) is different for men and women.

At the null hypothesis, we test if there is not difference, that is, the difference of the mean is 0, so:

[tex]H_0: \mu_M - \mu_W = 0[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if there is a difference, that is, the difference of the means is different of 0, so:

[tex]H_1: \mu_M - \mu_W \neq 0[/tex]

The sample statistic that must have changed after the correction was made is mean. Because mean is based on all the observation in the data. So changing any value in the data will impact mean.

Changing the highest salary in the data will have no impact on median because median lies at the center of data.

Changing the highest salary in the data will have no impact on mode because mode is the most frequently occurring value in the data.

Changing the highest salary in the data will have no impact on minimum because minimum is the smallest value in the data.

Hence the only statistic which will change is mean.

Answer: A-Mean

Step-by-step explanation:

A.) Mean

B.) Median

C.)  Mode

D.)  Minimum

Answer:

32 miles per hour

Step-by-step explanation:

x+85+75=192 x+160=192 x=192-160 x=32..

Answer:

A=W, B=X, C=Y, D=Z, AB=WX, BC=XY, CD=YZ, AD=WZ

(The second answer down)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

$7.13

Step-by-step explanation:

Given data

Cost of halibut per pound= $19

Let us convert pound to ounces first

1 pound = 16 ounces

Hence 16 ounces will cost $19

           6 ounces will cost x

cross multiply we have

x= 19*6/16

x=114/16

x=$7.13

Hence 6 ounces will cost $7.13

Decimals start at tenths, then hundredths, then thousandths, and so on. When we round, we look at the place value that is one smaller than the one we want to round to.

So, let's take a look at the thousandths place in 0.485. The value in the thousandths place is 5. When rounding, if the value is 5 or over we round up and if the value is 4 or lower we round down. Since the value in the thousandths place is 5, we will round the hundredths place up one.

0.485 rounded to the nearest hundredth is 0.49

Hope this helps!

Answer:

0.49

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]0<x<5=[/tex] Round down

[tex]x\geq5=[/tex] Round up

In this case, it's a round up, so the answer would be...

0.49

Hope this helped! Please mark brainliest!

Answer:

[tex]\frac{-2x+11}{(x-4)(x+1)}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

I don't think we can factor this so we'll have to multiply to make the denominators the same

[tex]\frac{3(x+1)}{(x^2-3x-4)(x+1)}-\frac{2(x^2-3x-4)}{(x+1)(x^2-3x-4)}\\\\\frac{3x+3-(2x^2-6x-8)}{(x^2-3x-4)(x+1)}=\frac{-2x^2+9x+11}{(x^2-3x-4)(x+1)}\\-2x^2+9x+11=(x+1)(-2x+11)\\\\x^2-3x-4=(x+1)(x-4)\\\frac{(x+1)(-2x+11)}{(x+1)(x-4)(x+1)}=\frac{-2x+11}{(x-4)(x+1)}[/tex]

Answer:

volume =l×b×h

45cm×32cm×35cm=48,960cm³

Answer:

assuming that you start at the origin (0,0)

(-4,-1) would be the poiny

x coord = -4

y coord = -1

the point is in the 3 quadrant

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

35ways

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the following

Total employees = 7employees

Number of tasks to be assigned = 4task

The number of ways this can be done is expressed as 7C4

7C4 = 7!/(7-4)!4!

7C4 = 7!/3!4!

7C4 = 7*6*5*4!/6*4!

7C4 = 35ways

Hence this can be done in 35ways

Answer:

87,500

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the last 2 digits arent 5 or greater than 5 it can not be rounded to the next hundred.

Answer:

875

Step-by-step explanation:

th t h t u

8 7 5 2 1

the hundred is 5 so the next digit after that is 2 remember 0 to 4 round down 5 to 9 round up

so 875

compute is an electronic devices

Answer:

The level of significance is the

b. maximum allowable probability of Type I error.

Step-by-step explanation:

The significance level provides the maximum probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true.  It is the same as a type I error (also known as false-positive).  This error occurs when a researcher or investigator rejects a true null hypothesis that is supposed to be accepted.  It is the opposite of a type II error (false-negative), which occurs when the researcher fails to reject a false null hypothesis.

Answer:

should just be 4/6 or 2/3 simplified lol

Step-by-step explanation:

ratios and fractions are very similar, just pronounced differently. 4:6 is read as "four to fix" while 4/6 is read as "four sixths". only difference is the punctuation

Answer:

"0.0808" is the appropriate response.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

n = 524

[tex]\hat{P}[/tex] = 41%

or,

   = 0.41

[tex]1-\hat{P}=1-0.41[/tex]

         [tex]=0.59[/tex]

[tex]\mu \hat{P}=\hat{P}[/tex]

     [tex]=0.41[/tex]

Now,

⇒ [tex]6 \hat{P}=\sqrt{\frac{\hat {P}(1-\hat{P})}{n} }[/tex]

         [tex]=\sqrt{\frac{0.41\times 0.59}{524} }[/tex]

         [tex]=0.0215[/tex]

[tex]P(\hat {P}>44 \ percent)[/tex]

or,

[tex]P(\hat{P}>0.44)[/tex]

          [tex]=1-P(\hat{P}<0.44)[/tex]

          [tex]=1-P(\frac{\hat{P}-\mu \hat{P}}{6 \hat{P}} <\frac{0.44-0.41}{0.0215} )[/tex]

          [tex]=1-P(z<1.40)[/tex]

By using the standard normal table, we get

          [tex]=1-0.9192[/tex]

          [tex]=0.0808[/tex]    

Step-by-step explanation:

let a=mangoes are delicious

b=mangoes are expensive

the symbolic form is a^b

Answer:

FALSE

Step-by-step explanation:

The regression equation is a prediction model which is generated for a given independent, x and dependent, y variable. The regression model is usually ideal when both the dependent and independent variables are numerical. The regression equation cannot be generated if either the x or y value is non-numeric. In such situation, classification models may be better suited for such cases especially if there is no efficient method of converting the non-numeric column into a numeric variable.

Answer:

0.0098 = 0.98% probability that the sample proportion will differ from the population proportion by greater than 0.04

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we need to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal Probability Distribution:

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central Limit Theorem

The Central Limit Theorem establishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].

For a skewed variable, the Central Limit Theorem can also be applied, as long as n is at least 30.

For a proportion p in a sample of size n, the sampling distribution of the sample proportion will be approximately normal with mean [tex]\mu = p[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}}[/tex]

Suppose the true proportion is 0.06.

This means that [tex]p = 0.06[/tex]

235 are sampled

This means that [tex]n = 235[/tex]

Mean and standard deviation:

[tex]\mu = p = 0.06[/tex]

[tex]s = \sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.06*0.94}{235}} = 0.0155[/tex]

What is the probability that the sample proportion will differ from the population proportion by greater than 0.04?

Proportion below 0.06 - 0.04 = 0.02 or above 0.06 + 0.04 = 0.1. Since the normal distribution is symmetric, these probabilities are equal, which means that we can find one of them and multiply by 2.

Probability the proportion is below 0.02.

p-value of Z when X = 0.02. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit Theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{0.02 - 0.06}{0.0155}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.58[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.58[/tex] has a p-value of 0.0049.

2*0.0049 = 0.0098

0.0098 = 0.98% probability that the sample proportion will differ from the population proportion by greater than 0.04