Find the value of x in each case:

Answer:

$370,881

Step-by-step explanation:

firstly we we multiply 1,5% by 2yrs. the answer we get is 3,0%. we then multiply 3 % by $123,627 and get $370,881

If Lisa bought a house The value of the house increased by 1.5% each year for 2 years.  The value of the house was £123,627. The initial amount of the house is  95120.7.

Percentage, a relative value indicating hundredth parts of any quantity.

Given,

Lisa bought a house The value of the house increased by 1.5% each year for 2 years

By the end of 2 years, the value of the house was £123,627.

A=P(1+rt)

A is the final amount,

r is rate of interest

t is the time

P is principle amount.

123,627=P(1+1.5/100 (2))

123657=P(1+0.15(2))

123657=P(1+0.3)

123657=1.3P

Divide both sides by 1.3

P=95120.7

The initial amount of the house when Lisa bought is 95120.7

To learn more on Percentage click:

https://brainly.com/question/28269290

#SPJ2

Answer:

5,5,6,6,13

Step-by-step explanation:

Mode means most often.  The 5 numbers has 2 modes 5 and 6

This means that 4 of the numbers must be 5,5,6,6

Median means the middle number must be 6

5,5,6,6,x is the only way to to get the middle number to be 6

We need to average to 7

(5+5+6+6+x) /5 = 7

(5+5+6+6+x) /5  *5= 7*5

(5+5+6+6+x) =35

22+x = 35

x = 35-22

x = 13

The other number is 13

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  7.51 m

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation matches that required for finding the length of a pendulum that has a period of 5.5 seconds. We can solve for L to find the length.

  [tex]5.5=2\pi\sqrt{\dfrac{L}{9.8}}\\\\\dfrac{5.5}{2\pi}=\sqrt{\dfrac{L}{9.8}}\\\\\left(\dfrac{5.5}{2\pi}\right)^2=\dfrac{L}{9.8}\\\\L=74.1125/\pi^2\approx7.509[/tex]

The length of a pendulum with period 5.5 seconds is about 7.51 meters.

Answer:

The length, L = 7.52 m.

Step-by-step explanation:

The given expression is

[tex]5.5= 2 \pi \sqrt\frac{L}{9.8}\\\\Sqauring on both the sides\\\\5.5 \times 5.5 = 4\pi^2 \times \frac{L}{9.8}\\\\L = 7.52 m[/tex]

The value of length is 7.52 m.

Answer:

14.077 feet to the nearest thousandth.

Step-by-step explanation:

First let's work out the multiplier:

6 + 5 + 2 = 13.

61/2 = 30.5

- so the multiplier is 30.5/13 = 2.34615

The longest piece refers to the 6 in the ratio its length

= 6 * 2.34615

= 14.0769 ft.

Answer:

The slant height of the cone affected is two times the slant height of original cone

Step-by-step explanation:

we know that

If the height and base radius of a cone are increased by a factor of  to create a similar cone

then

the scale factor is equal to  

therefore

the slant height of the cone affected is equal to the slant height of the original cone multiplied by the scale factor

Find the slant height of the original cone

Let

l-----> slant height of original cone

la-----> slant height of the cone affected

Applying the Pythagoras theorem

so

The slant height of the cone affected is two times the slant height of original cone

(I GOT THIS FROM SOMEONE ELSES ANSWER IN 2017 SO I HOPE THIS HELPS)

The slant height of the larger cone is double the slant height of the smaller cone.

Option B is the correct answer.

It is a shape of a Christmas tree where there is a base of radius r and a top point called the apex.

The volume of a cone is 1/3 πr²h

We have,

The slant height of the cone is affected by a factor of 2.

When the height and base radius of a cone are multiplied by 2, the dimensions of the new cone are doubled.

Therefore,

The slant height of the larger cone is double the slant height of the smaller cone.

Learn more about cones here:

https://brainly.com/question/13798146

#SPJ5

Solution :

Using the TI-84 PLUS calculator

a). Area : 0.41

μ = 75

σ = 9

InvNorm(0.41,75,9)

= 72.95209525

Therefore, the 41st percentile of the scores is 72.95209525

b).  Area : 0.74

μ = 75

σ = 9

InvNorm(0.74,75,9)

= 80.79010862

Therefore, the 74st percentile of the scores is 80.79010862

c). 8%

So,  Area : 0.92

μ = 75

σ = 9

InvNorm(0.92,75,9)

= 87.64564405

Therefore, X =  80.79010862

Answer:

the probability that we hit the bullseye at least 100 times is 0.0113

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the data in the question;

Binomial distribution

We find the probability of hitting the dart on the disk

⇒ Area of small disk / Area of bigger disk

⇒ πR₁² / πR₂²

given that; disk-shaped board of radius R² = 5, disk-shaped bullseye with radius R₁ = 1

so we substitute

⇒ π(1)² / π(5)² = π/π25 = 1/25 = 0.04

Since we have to hit the disk 2000 times, we represent the number of times the smaller disk ( BULLSEYE ) will be hit by X.

so

X ~ Bin( 2000, 0.04 )

n = 2000

p = 0.04

np = 2000 × 0.04 = 80

Using central limit theorem;

X ~ N( np, np( 1 - p ) )

we substitute

X ~ N( 80, 80( 1 - 0.04 ) )

X ~ N( 80, 80( 0.96 ) )

X ~ N( 80, 76.8 )

So, the probability that we hit the bullseye at least 100 times, P( X ≥ 100 ) will be;

we covert to standard normal variable

⇒ P( X ≥  [tex]\frac{100-80}{\sqrt{76.8} }[/tex] )

⇒ P( X ≥ 2.28217 )

From standard normal distribution table

P( X ≥ 2.28217 ) = 0.0113

Therefore, the probability that we hit the bullseye at least 100 times is 0.0113

Answer:

No it is not since there is 15 defectice parts in 2machines and there is 8 broken parts in the one machine

Hope This Helps!!!

Answer:

The p-value of the test is 0.1017, which is greater than the standard significance level of 0.05, which means that this is not good evidence that the mean real compensation μ of all CEOs increased that year.

Step-by-step explanation:

At the null hypothesis, we test if there was no increase, that is, the mean is 0, so:

[tex]H_0: \mu = 0[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, we test if there was an increase, that is, the mean is greater than 0, so:

[tex]H_1: \mu > 0[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]t = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, s is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0[/tex]

104 companies, adjusted for inflation, in a recent year. The mean increase in real compensation was x¯=6.9%, and the standard deviation of the increases was s=55%.

This means that [tex]n = 104, X = 6.9, s = 55[/tex]

Value of the test-statistic:

[tex]t = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = \frac{6.9 - 0}{\frac{55}{\sqrt{104}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = 1.28[/tex]

P-value of the test:

The p-value of the test is a right-tailed test(test if the mean is greater than a value), with 104 - 1 = 103 df and t = 1.28.

Using a t-distribution calculator, this p-value is of 0.1017.

The p-value of the test is 0.1017, which is greater than the standard significance level of 0.05, which means that this is not good evidence that the mean real compensation μ of all CEOs increased that year.

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to prove that ,

cot x / csc x - csc x / cot x = - tan x sec x .

LHS :-

> cot x / csc x - csc x / cot x

> cos x / sin x ÷ csc x - sin x × csc x / cos x

> cosx - 1/ cos x

> cos² x - 1 / cos x

> - sin²x / cosx

> -sin x / cos x × sin x

> -tan x sin x

= RHS

Hence Proved !

Answer:

It should be the top right one

(with 6ft as the height)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

It must be the lower to the left choice.

Step-by-step explanation:

As you can see, the net we have is composed of only triangles.

So we should be choosing a figure with a triangular base.

Our answers are narrowed down into the top right and lower left choices because both figures have triangular bases.

The other person down there chose the top right choice and was incorrect, so the answer should be the lower to the left figure.

Also, its the lower left figure because look at the triangular base, it is an isosceles meaning that two sides have the same length.

If the net says that the long side measures 9 ft, then the other two sides should be the same length and shorter than 9 ft. So the answer is the lower left figure.

Hope this helps

I can't see the diagram sorry.

Step-by-step explanation:

Is there supposed to be a picture attached?

Answer: This problem is a fraction since we have several equal parts that make up one whole. The problem asks us to talk about the relationship of white pieces to the whole. Since we know the whole is made up of 7 pieces (4 blue parts and 3 white parts = 7 total parts), then 7 will be our denominator (number on the bottom of the fraction).

Now that we have our number on the bottom, we need to look back at the question to carefully decide what parts of the whole we are looking at. The question wants to know how many of the parts are white. We know that 3 of the parts are white, so that is our numerator (number of the top of the fraction).

Our final answer is 3/7 or "three-sevenths." Said another way, three of the seven pieces are white.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Total earning last month with x articles is:

This is same amount as 2000

The equation is:

Answer:

AB

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question given above, we were told that triangle ABC is similar to triangle PTG.

Since both triangles are similar, the following assumptions hold:

PG / AC = PT / AB = TG / BC

Comparing the equation above with those given in the question, the missing part of the equation is AB

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

3x - 6(5x + 3) = 9x + 6

Distribute

3x -30x-18 = 9x+6

Combine like terms

-27x - 18 = 9x+6

Add 27x  to each side

-27x+27x-18 = 9x+27x+6

-18 = 36x+6

Subtract 6 from each side

-18-6 = 36x+6-6

-24 = 36x

Divide by 36

-24/36 = 36x/36

Simplify

-2/3 = x

Answer:

[tex]\small \sf x = \frac{2}{-3} \\ [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

3x - 6(5x + 3) = 9x + 6.

Use the distributive property to multiply -6 by 5x + 3.

3x - 30x - 18 = 9x + 6

Combine 3x and -30x to get -27x.

-27x - 18 = 9x + 6

Subtract 9x from both sides.

-27x - 9x - 18 = 9x - 9x + 6

-36x - 18 = 6

Add 18 to both sides.

-36x - 18 + 18 = 6 + 18

-36x = 24

Divide both sides by -36.

[tex]\small \sf \frac{ -36x}{ -36} = \frac{24}{-36} \\ [/tex]

Reduce the fraction [tex]\frac{24}{-36} [/tex] to lowest terms by extracting and canceling out 12.

[tex]\small \sf x = \frac{2}{-3} \\ [/tex]

Answer:

2x + 3y -3=0

Step-by-step explanation:

The given equation of the line is ,

[tex]\implies 2x - 3y = 13 [/tex]

Now convert it into slope intercept form to get the slope , we get ,

[tex]\implies 3y = 2x - 13 \\\\\implies y =\dfrac{2}{3}x -\dfrac{13}{2}[/tex]

Therefore the slope is ,

[tex]\implies m = \dfrac{2}{3} [/tex]

We know that the product of slope of perpendicular lines is -1 . Therefore the slope of the perpendicular line will be ,

[tex]\implies m_{perpendicular}= -\dfrac{2}{3} [/tex]

Now one of the point is (-6,5) .On Using point slope form , we have ,

[tex]\implies y-y_1 = m( x - x_1) \\\\\implies y - 5 = -\dfrac{2}{3}( x + 6 ) \\\\\implies 3y - 15 = -2x -12

\\\\\implies 2x + 3y -15+12=0 \\\\\implies \underline{\underline{ 2x + 3y -3=0 }}[/tex]

Answer:

y = - [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex]x - 4

Step-by-step explanation:

2x – 3y = 13

3y = 2x + 13

y = [tex]\frac{2}{3}[/tex]x + [tex]\frac{13}{3}[/tex]

slope = 2/3

negative reciprocal = -3/2

y = -3/2x + b

(-6, 5)

5 = (-3/2)(-6) + b

5 = 9 + b

b = -4

y = -3/2x - 4

Answer:

Who was the first president of United States?

Answer:

HOPE IT HELPS PLZ MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Step-by-step explanation:

A={1,2,3,4,5,6}

R={(x,y):y is divisible by x}

We know that any number (x) is divisible by itself.

(x,x)∈R

∴R is reflexive.

Now,(2,4)∈R [as 4 is divisible by 2]

But,(4,2)∈ /

R. [as 2 is not divisible by 4]

∴R is not symmetric.

Let (x,y),(y,z)∈R. Then, y is divisible by x and z is divisible by y.

∴z is divisible by x.

⇒(x,z)∈R

∴R is transitive.

Hence, R is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric.

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio is 2 to 5 or 2:5 or 2/5. All these describe the ratio in different forms of fractions. The ratio can consequently be expressed as fractions or as a decimal.

A ratio of 2 : 5 states a comparison between two quantities.

A ratio is a comparison between two similar quantities in simplest form.

Proportions are of two types one is the direct proportion in which if one quantity is increased by a constant k the other quantity will also be increased by the same constant k and vice versa.

In the case of inverse proportion if one quantity is increased by a constant k the quantity will decrease by the same constant k and vice versa.

Given, a ratio 2 : 5.

Suppose it is a ratio of no. of pens to no. of pencils.

So, a ratio 2 : 5 states for every 2 pens there are 5 pencils out of 7 pen and pencils.

We can also write no. of pens = 2/(2+ 5) = 2/7 and for pencils it is 5(2+5)

= 5/7.

Generally, ratios are in simplest form we can have more pens and pencils here but it must be in the multiple of 7.

learn more about ratios here :

https://brainly.com/question/13419413

#SPJ2

Answer:

Take a look of the image below, we can think on this problem as a problem of two triangle rectangles.

We can see that both triangles share the adjacent cathetus, then the height of the flagpole is just the difference between the opposite cathetus.

Remember the relation:

Tan(a) = (opposite cathetus)/(adjacent cathetus)

So, if we define H as the height of the cliff

X as the distance between the observer and the cliff

and h as the height of the flagopole

we can write:

tan(40°) = H/X

tan(45°) = (H + h)/X

Notice that we have two equations and 3 variables (we should have the same number of equations than variables) then here is missing information, and we can't get an exact solution for the height of the flagpole.

But we can write it in terms of the height of the cliff H, or in terms of the distance between the observer and the cliff.

We want to find the value of h.

If we take the quotient between both equations, we get:

Tan(45°)/Tan(40°) = (H + h)/H

1.192 = (H + h)/H

1.192*H = H + h

1.192*H - H = h

0.192*H = h

So the height of the flagpole is 0.192 times the height of the cliff.

Answer:

La suma de las dos matrices cuadradas de dimensión 2 es [tex]\vec U = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-1&11\\2&5\end{array}\right][/tex].

Step-by-step explanation:

Considerando que se tratan de dos matrices de igual dimensión y cuyos elementos son números reales, conocemos que la adición entre dos matrices consiste en las sumas de los elementos de igual posición, esto es, los elementos que están localizados en las mismas filas y columnas, entonces, la suma es:

[tex]\vec A = \left[\begin{array}{cc}1&2\\-1&0\end{array} \right][/tex], [tex]\vec B = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-2&9\\3&5\end{array}\right][/tex]

[tex]\vec U = \vec A + \vec B = \left[\begin{array}{cc}1 + (-2)&2+9\\-1 + 3&0 + 5\end{array}\right][/tex]

[tex]\vec U = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-1&11\\2&5\end{array}\right][/tex]

La suma de las dos matrices cuadradas de dimensión 2 es [tex]\vec U = \left[\begin{array}{cc}-1&11\\2&5\end{array}\right][/tex].

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = 3x² -5x - 1

f'(x) =2*3x - 5*1 +0

     = 6x - 5

f'(4) = 6*4 - 5

      = 24 - 5

      = 19

Answer:

Translation

Step-by-step explanation:

A translation is when the triangle is moved around on the graph without it being reflected or changed in any way. I will be the same exact triangle, just with different coordinates.

Hope this helps!

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  x = 30 2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Angles 4 and 5 are complementary, so we have ...

  m∠4 +m∠5 = 90°

  (2x +4) +(x -6) = 90

  3x -2 = 90 . . . . . . . . . collect terms

  3x = 92 . . . . . . . . . . add 2; next, divide by 3

  x = 92/3 = 30 2/3

Answer:

The z-score for the trainee is of 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

Normal Probability Distribution

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

The mean of the test scores is 72 with a standard deviation of 5.

This means that [tex]\mu = 72, \sigma = 5[/tex]

Find the z-score for a trainee, given a score of 82.

This is Z when X = 82. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{82 - 72}{5}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2[/tex]

The z-score for the trainee is of 2.

Answer:

))

Step-by-step explanation:

just place your decimal once to the left I think

Answer:

1/4 = x

Step-by-step explanation:

x - 2( 3x - 1 ) = 3x

Step 1 :- Distribute 2

x - 2 × 3x - 2 × 1 = 3x

x - 6x + 2 = 3x

Step 2:- Combine like terms

-5x + 2 = 3x

Step 3 :- Add 5x to both sides

-5x + 5x + 2 = 3x + 5x

2 = 8x

Step 4 :- Divide both side by 8

2/8 = 8x / 8

1/4 = x