Major-General Robert Clive, 1st Baron Clive KB, FRS (29 September 1725 – 22 November 1774),[1][2][3] was the first British Governor of the Bengal Presidency. He is credited along with Warren Hastings for laying the foundation of the British Empire in India.[4][5] He began as a writer (the term used then in India for an office clerk) for the East India Company (EIC) who established the military and political supremacy of the EIC by securing a decisive victory in Bengal and looting its treasury of an estimated £2.325 billion in modern terms.[6] In return for supporting the Nawab of Bengal Mir Jafar on the throne, Clive was granted a jaghire of £30,000 (equivalent to £4,100,000 in 2019) per year which was the rent the EIC would otherwise pay to the Nawab for their tax farming concession, when he left India he had a fortune of £180,000 (equivalent to £24,300,000 in 2019) which he remitted through the Dutch East India Company.[7] Blocking impending French mastery of India, and eventual British expulsion from the continent, Clive improvised a military expedition that ultimately enabled the EIC to adopt the French strategy of indirect rule via puppet government. Hired by the EIC to return a second time to India, Clive conspired to secure the company's trade interests by overthrowing the ruler of Bengal, the richest state in India. Back in England, he used his treasure from India to secure an Irish barony from the then Whig PM, Thomas Pelham-Holles, 1st Duke of Newcastle, and a seat for himself in Parliament, via Henry Herbert, 1st Earl of Powis, representing the Whigs in Shrewsbury, Shropshire (1761–1774), as he had previously in Mitchell, Cornwall (1754–1755).[8][9]
Answer:
Robert Clive, 1st Baron Clive of Plassey, KB (29 September 1725 – 22 November 1774), also known as Clive of India, was a British soldier who established British control in Southern India and Bengal. Together with Warren Hastings he was one of the key figures in the creation of British India.
Where were the first Spanish colonies located in the New World?
Which of these is the most likely outcome of a financial crisis?
A. Lower unemployment
B. More businesses failing
C. Fewer foreclosures
D. Greater company profits
Answer:
B More Buisness failing
Explanation:
it is the only negative one
Answer:
more business falling,
when there is no financial crisis more business are even falling talk less of when there's no financial crisis in a country
Which powers are given directly to the people or the states? O implied O reserved O concurrent O expressed
the answer is ( reserved )
Reserved powers are given directly to the people or the states.
What are reserved power?This is known to be a kind of a special political authority. These powers are given directly to the people or the states.
The Reserved powers is also known as residual powers, or residuary powers. They are the powers that are said to be allowed by law to any type of government.
Learn more about Reserved powers from
https://brainly.com/question/13503164
Read the paragraph below from the section "What practical factors did you consider when thinking about food production on Mars?"
Mars has almost no atmosphere. The atmosphere is the layer of gases surrounding the planet. The atmosphere of Mars is much thinner than Earth's atmosphere. Mars is also very cold.
What conclusion can the reader make based on this paragraph?
(A) Conditions are much harsher on Mars than on Earth.
(B) People will be unable to grow their own food on Mars.
(C) Structures on Mars will be bigger than structures on Earth.
(D) There is a limited amount of land to use to grow food on Mars.
3. What powers did Hamilton think that
Congress should have?
Answer:
He believe that congress can create a bank because the Constitution granted the federal government authority to do anything "necessary and proper" to carry out its constitutional functions.
Explanation:
Which of the following does not protect consumers?
O A. A boycott
O B. A recall
O C. Antitrust laws
O D. A warranty
Help please it’s economics
Answer:
A boycott
Explanation:
because it is an act of non violent, voluntary and intentional abstention from using,buying , organization
Which generalization best explains why Koreans made scientific advancements during the time period discussed in the excerpt above?
1.Scientific achievement is a central tenet of Buddhism
2.Korean Buddhists conquered civilizations that made technological breakthroughs
3.Other Buddhist civilizations shared technological innovations in addition to cultural ideas
4.The Chinese conquered Korea and brought their innovations with them
Answer:
4. The Chinese conquered Korea and brought their innovations with them
Explanation: my teacher explained it to us :D
The Chinese colonized Korea and carried their innovations with them, which is the greatest generalization that explains why Koreans made scientific achievements during that time period.
Thus, Option D is correct.
Is South Korea a technical powerhouse?South Korea is also one of the most technologically advanced and digitally connected countries in the world.
With the third-highest number of broadband Internet users among OECD countries and a leading voice in electronics, video screens, semiconductor gadgets, and cellular phones.
To learn more about Korean scientific advancements refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/967561
#SPJ2
4. There were many important results of the Civil War. Which do you think was the most important, and why?
Start typing here
The Cold War was a time best characterized by
which word?
warfare
understanding
tension
cooperation
“The peace conditions imposed upon Germany are so hard, so humiliating, that those who had even the tiniest hope for a ‘just peace’ are bound to be deeply disappointed. Our condemnation of the lust of power and conquest that Germany displayed during the war is strong and unwavering. But a condemnation of wartime actions must not amount to a lasting condemnation of an entire nation.
The question is not whether the Germans have been led astray by their leaders, or whether they have been willing accomplices in the misdeeds of those leaders—the question is, whether it is in the interest of mankind to punish the German people as the Entente governments seem to have decided to do.
The Entente evidently desires the complete annihilation of Germany. Not only will its whole commercial fleet be confiscated, but its shipbuilding yards will be obliged to work for the foreigner for some time to come. Whole regions of Germany will be entirely deprived of their liberty; they will be under a committee of foreign domination, without adequate representation. The financial burden is so heavy that it is no exaggeration to say that Germany is reduced to economic bondage. The Germans will have to work hard and incessantly for foreign masters, without any chance of personal gain, or any prospect of regaining liberty or economic independence.
This ‘peace’ offered to Germany is a mockery of President Wilson’s principles. Trusting in these, Germany surrendered and accepted peace. That confidence has been betrayed in such a manner that all Germans must now feel that they wish to shake off the heavy yoke imposed on them by the cajoling Entente. And we fear very much that they will soon find the opportunity to do so. Chained and enslaved, Germany will always remain a menace to Europe.”
Algemeen Handelsblad, Dutch liberal newspaper, editorial on the Treaty of Versailles, June 1919
The mention of “President Wilson’s principles” is most directly significant to understanding the editorial’s point of view about the Treaty of Versailles because of the United States president’s commitment to
establish an international organization to prevent future conflicts
Answer A: establish an international organization to prevent future conflicts
A
work to create nation-states for ethnic minorities that had been under imperial control
Answer B: work to create nation-states for ethnic minorities that had been under imperial control
B
broker a peace agreement on liberal principles that would not be motivated by revenge
Answer C: broker a peace agreement on liberal principles that would not be motivated by revenge
C
resist the spread of Bolshevism following the Russian Revolution
Answer: C: broker a peace agreement on liberal principles that would not be motivated by revenge.
Explanation:
After the war ended, President Woodrow Wilson wanted the peace settlement to be such that Germany and the Central powers were not punished so much that they would seek revenge in future.
For this to happen, the Allies would have to impose a peace settlement based on liberal principles that would not be motivated by revenge. Contrary to his wishes, the peace settlement was quite harsh and indirectly led to the Nazis coming to power and initiating WWII.
The mention of “President Wilson’s principles” is most directly significant to understanding the Treaty of Versailles because of the president’s commitment to broker a peace agreement on liberal principles that would not be motivated by revenge.
Aftermath the war, President Woodrow Wilson wanted the peace settlement to be such that Germany and the Central powers were not punished so much that they would seek revenge in future.
Hence, the mention is made because of the president’s commitment to broker a peace agreement on liberal principles that would not be motivated by revenge.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about Treaty of Versailles
brainly.com/question/454593
...What's the Magna Carta?
Answer:
Magna Carta, English Great Charter, charter of English liberties granted by King John on June 15, 1215, under threat of civil war and reissued, with alterations, in 1216, 1217, and 1225. By declaring the sovereign to be subject to the rule of law and documenting the liberties held by “free men,” the Magna Carta provided the foundation for individual rights in Anglo-American jurisprudence.
Stenton, Doris Mary. "Magna Carta". Encyclopedia Britannica, 11 Feb. 2021, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Magna-Carta. Accessed 27 June 2021.
which heading best completes the partial outline?
A)Causes of the Russo-Japanese War
B) outcome of the Congress of Vienna
C) results of the Versailles treaty
D) effects of the Bolshevik revolution
Answer:
d
Explanation:
I think its D and good luck on that final bro
Help me plssss thank youuu
Answer:
sorry i would help you but i can't see the pic
Explanation:
The growing support for civil rights following World War II led countries to begin promoting: A. access to the global community. O B. pride in national identities. O C. rapid economic growth. D. equality for citizens of all races.
Answer:
D. equality for citizens of all races
Explanation:
The growing support for civil rights led many countries to begin promoting equality for all citizens. Many countries promoted equality based on basic rights rather than being treated differently based on ethnic groups, race, colour, or religion. The civil rights movement took place during the 1950s and 1960s in the United States. It was a movement for social justice for African Americans to obtain equal rights.
What gets small when its older but it’s big when it’s young
[tex]\huge\color{purple}\boxed{\colorbox{black}{Candle. }}[/tex]
[tex]\bold{ \green{ \star{ \orange{Mystique35}}}}⋆[/tex]
Answer:
Pencil
Explanation:
Cuz you sharpen it and it gets small.
what are characteristics of fascism and not of democracy
Answer:
Hi , so your answer is that fascism is a form of far-right, authoritarian ultranationalism characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition , and strong regimentation of society and of the economy .
Explanation:
Really hope i helped , have a nice day :) .
Who wanted a limited or constitutional monarchy?
the Conservatives
the Jacobins
the Church
the king
Answer: The conservatives
Explanation:
Answer: The conservatives
Explanation: Just took the test
HELP ASAP, HAVING A UNIT TEST BEING TIMED
Read the passage from Chief Joseph.
For a short time we lived quietly. But this could not last. White men had found gold in the mountains . . . . They stole a great many horses from us . . . . The white men told lies for each other. They drove off a great many of our cattle. Some white men branded our young cattle so they could claim them. We had no friends who would plead our cause before the law councils. . . . I labored hard to avoid trouble and bloodshed. We gave up some of our country to the white men, thinking that then we could have peace. We were mistaken.
–Chief Joseph,
Nez Perce
Which statement best sums up Chief Joseph’s point of view?
OThe arrival of settlers meant his people could live in peace.
OIt is wrong to steal horses or to brand cattle that are young.
OThe Nez Perces learned a great deal from the newcomers.
OIt was a mistake to welcome the Americans to Nez Perce land.
At the end of World War Il, there was only one superpower. Who was it?
O Red China
O United States
• Soviet Union
O Great Britain
Answer:
O United States
Explanation:
At the end of World war two the united states had the only nuclear weapons in the world.
¿Por qué se produce la crisis de la monarquía española? ¿Cuál era la situación de España a fines del siglo XVIII y comienzos del siglo XIX?
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no anexas opciones o incisos para responder, podemos comentar lo siguiente.
La crisis de la monarquía española se produce aproximadamente entrando al mes de marzo de 1808 debido a una revuelta debido a la situación política dentro del interior del palacio real. Conocida como el motín de Aranjuez, el rey Carlos IV se ve en la necesidad de abdicar al trono debido a la fuerte presión ejercida. El respaldo total es para su hijo, y es cuando Fernando VII se convierte en el nuevo rey de España.
La situación de España a fines del siglo XVIII y comienzos del siglo XIX era muy complicada. Los ejércitos franceses de Napoleón estaban estacionados en España y ejercían una fuerte presión en ese reino, al grado de que se consideró la posibilidad de que el rey de España tuviera que salir de Madrid para irse a refugiar a Sevilla, ante la constante amenaza del ejército francés. Finalmente, asumiría el poder José Bonaparte.
Which is true of the 1912 presidential election?
[tex]\huge\tt\pink{Answer}[/tex]
Democratic Governor Woodrow Wilson unseated incumbent Republican President William Howard Taft and defeated former President Theodore Roosevelt, who ran under the banner of the new Progressive or "Bull Moose" Party. The Socialist Party renominated its perennial standard-bearer, Eugene V. Debs.
The Greeks sought out the disciple ______
because he had a Gentile name.
Andrew
Philip
Answer:
Philip!
Explanation:
A major effect of the agricultural revolution was
Answer:
The increase in agricultural production and technological advancements during the Agricultural Revolution contributed to unprecedented population growth and new agricultural practices, triggering such phenomena as rural-to-urban migration, development of a coherent and loosely regulated agricultural market.
Explanation:
Answer:
a major effect of the agricultural revolution was
How are China's dams causing international consequences and questions over water rights?
Answer:
China's water supply has been contaminated by the dumping of toxic human and industrial waste. Pollution-induced algae blooms cause the surface of China's lakes to turn a bright green, but greater problems may lurk beneath the surface; groundwater in 90 percent of China's cities is contaminated.Many times in these cases, the pollution is caused by chemical dumping from nearby factories. Dumping of industrial chemicals, agricultural waste, and urban wastewater has contaminated China's water resources such that over half of all rivers in the country are unsafe for human contact.China's sweeping campaign to cleanse filthy lakes and rivers has improved water quality in some regions — but dirty water still plagues parts of the country. China began tightening environmental rules in 2001, in an effort to cut water pollution emitted by cities, industrial facilities and farms.Dam construction has played significant roles in flood control, irrigation, navigation, and energy supply; however, the enormous negative effects, such as landslides, ecological problems, and water quality decline, could surpass positive gains.
The Thirty Years’ War in Central Europe began when
the Anglican Church was established in Germany and was met with resistance.
Lutheran princes challenged the Holy Roman Emperor, who was Catholic.
Lutheran princes battled Huguenot princes for control of German states.
Calvinists went to Germany to spread their beliefs and establish strict laws.
Answer:
Lutheran princes challenged the Holy Roman Emperor, who was Catholic.
The Thirty Years’ War in Central Europe began when Lutheran princes challenged the Holy Roman Emperor, who was Catholic. Thus, option B is correct.
In European history, the Thirty Years' War (1618–48) was a string of conflicts involving several countries due to territorial, dynastic, religious, and commercial rivalry. The majority of Europe was on the scene of its catastrophic campaigns and wars, and by the time it came to a close in 1648 with the Treaty of Westphalia, the continent's geography had been irreparably altered.
The Thirty Years War is generally accepted to have started in 1618, when the Protestant nobles of both Bohemia and Austria rebelled against the Roman Catholic absolutism that the future Holy Roman emperor Ferdinand II tried to impose on his domains, despite the fact that the conflicts had started a few years earlier.
Learn more about the thirty years war here:
https://brainly.com/question/31215389
#SPJ4
Which route on the map did Vasco da Gama use in his search to a find new way to Asia?
Answer:
vasco da gama went around africa to find the new way to asia.
Explanation:
Answer:
he actually went around africa so the one that goes around africa
Explanation:
explain the impact of World War 1 on American civil liberties.
During World War I, the Woodrow Wilson administration took unprecedented steps to mobilize public support for the war. In addition to a massive government propaganda campaign, Congress passed laws designed to silence dissent. Newspapers were censored, politicians
were jailed, and mobs attacked those suspected of disloyalty. Some Americans organized to protest the erosion of democratic freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, a group of rights that they called "civil liberties." Thus, while democratic freedoms were undermined during World War I, public concern over these policies inspired the beginnings of a twentieth-century movement to guard the right of Americans to criticize their government, even when their country is at war.
When President Woodrow Wilson called on Congress to declare war on Germany in April 1917, the government faced a formidable task. Millions of young men had to be drafted, equipped, trained, and shipped an ocean away. To accomplish this in time to break the military stalemate on Europe's western front, Wilson demanded unprecedented powers to mobilize American society.
In addition to drafting men and directing the economy, Wilson took steps to control public opinion, encouraging patriotic support for the war effort. The task was made more urgent because Americans remained deeply divided about the conflict. When Germany invaded France in 1914, most Americans shared Wilson's desire to remain neutral. His reelection in 1916 was widely considered a vote for the man who "kept us out of war." When he declared war five months later, many Americans still opposed involvement. Some German immigrants remained sympathetic to their ancestral home; socialists thought the war was inspired by capitalist greed; and various religious sects opposed all war on principle. Considering national unity essential to military success, Wilson took steps to silence these critics, guarding American society from what he called "the poison of disloyalty."
Proposals for extending the United States school year to bring it more in line with its European and Japanese counterparts are often met with the objection that curtailing the schools' three month summer vacation would violate an established United States tradition dating from the nineteenth century. However, this objection misses its mark. True, in the nineteenth century the majority of schools closed for three months every summer, but only because they were in rural areas where successful harvests depended on children's labor. If any policy could be justified by those appeals to tradition, it would be the policy of determining the length of the school year according to the needs of the economy. The argument counters the objection by
Answer:
The correct option is (C) arguing for an alternative understanding of the nature of the United States tradition regarding the length of the school year.
Explanation:
Note: This question is no complete as it does include the group of answer choices. The complete question is therefore provided before answering as follows:
Proposals for extending the United States school year to bring it more in line with its European and Japanese counterparts are often met with the objection that curtailing the schools' three month summer vacation would violate an established United States tradition dating from the nineteenth century. However, this objection misses its mark. True, in the nineteenth century the majority of schools closed for three months every summer, but only because they were in rural areas where successful harvests depended on children's labor. If any policy could be justified by those appeals to tradition, it would be the policy of determining the length of the school year according to the needs of the economy. The argument counters the objection by
The argument counters the objection by
(A) providing evidence to show that the objection relies on a misunderstanding about the amount of time each year United States schools traditionally have been closed
(B) calling into question the relevance of information about historical practices to current disputes about proposed social change
(C) arguing for an alternative understanding of the nature of the United States tradition regarding the length of the school year
(D) showing that those who oppose extending the school year have no genuine concern for tradition
(E) demonstrating that tradition justifies bringing the United States school year in line with that of the rest of the industrialized world.
Explanation of the answer is now provided by analyzing each of the options as follows:
(A) providing evidence to show that the objection relies on a misunderstanding about the amount of time each year United States schools traditionally have been closed
The time frame provided was, as far as we know, correct and accurate. Therefore, this option is out.
(B) calling into question the relevance of information about historical practices to current disputes about proposed social change
Inconsistent, which makes it tricky. The data used is accurate and pertinent to the topic. The data used is accurate and pertinent to the topic at hand. However, the error is the use of a parallelism between the practice of a tradition a century ago and the practice of the same tradition today that youngsters are no longer required to work over the summer.
(C) arguing for an alternative understanding of the nature of the United States tradition regarding the length of the school year
Indeed, the reasoning demands us to abandon the reasons that shaped tradition in the first place, despite the fact that such reasons no longer apply. This is therefore the correct option.
(D) showing that those who oppose extending the school year have no genuine concern for tradition
This is not within the scope.
(E) demonstrating that tradition justifies bringing the United States school year in line with that of the rest of the industrialized world
This is not within the scope.
Who became the richest from the Gold Rush in 1850?
Answer:
"Brannan" is the appropriate answer.
Explanation:
The wealthiest individual named "Brannan", the most powerful families throughout California were recognized throughout the centuries the 1850s as well as 1860s.The turmoil of something like the surge of riches was playing against his temperament as well as entrepreneurial sensibilities or skills, but perhaps a player cared for him.Thus the above is the correct answer.
The united states started with the Federalist and Anti-federalists party, and that is one reason why we have 2 political parties now
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the question. This is just a statement.
What is your question? What do you want to know?
If this is a true or false question, then the answer is "true."
It is true that the United States started with the Federalist and Anti-federalists party, and that is one reason why we have 2 political parties now.
During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, two factions debated and argued about the best form of government for the United States and the issue of representation of citizens. Federalists led by James Madison and Alexander Hamilton favored a strong central government. Antifederalists like Thomas Jefferson did not support a strong federal government because they thought it could turn into tyranny, as was the case of the British monarchy. Finally, they could move on when James Madison drafted the Bill of Rights, which is the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution.
