help help help help help

Answer:

  The graph of the function is negative on (3, ∞)

Step-by-step explanation:

The function starts negative at the left side of the graph, crosses the x-axis at x = -5, touches the x-axis at x = 1, again crosses into negative values at x = 3.

The function is positive on the open intervals (-5, 1) and (1, 3). It is negative on the open intervals (-∞, -5) and (3, ∞). The latter description matches the last answer choice:

  the graph of the function is negative on (3, ∞).

Answer:

4.3 + (-1.07)+(-2.971)

Step-by-step explanation:

4.3 + (-1.07)+(-2.971)

4.3 -1.07-2.971

4.3 - 4.041= 0.259

Answer:

In Geometry, we have several undefined terms: point, line and plane. From these three undefined terms, all other terms in Geometry can be defined. In Geometry, we define a point as a location and no size. ... And the third undefined term is the line.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:-2

Step-by-step explanation:

Log3(1/9)

Log(1/9) ➗ Log3

Log(1/3^2) ➗ Log3

Log3^(-2) ➗ Log3

-2Log3 ➗ Log3

-2(Log3 ➗ Log3)

-2

The solution of the expression by taking a log is, log₃ (1/9) = - 2

Used the formula for the logarithmic function,

log₃ (a)ⁿ = n log₃ (a)

log₃ (3) = 1

Given that,

The logarithmic function is,

log₃ (1/9)

It can be written as,

log₃ (3⁻²)

Since, log₃ (a)ⁿ = n log₃ (a)

So, we get;

- 2 log₃ (3)

- 2 × 1

- 2

Therefore, the solution is - 2.

To learn more about the function visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ6

Answer:

  5 units up

Step-by-step explanation:

Adding 5 to the y-value of an (x, y) coordinate moves it up 5 units.

f(x) = x^2 +5 is translated 5 units upward from f(x) = x^2.

Answer:

[see below]

Step-by-step explanation:

Add all values together:

[tex]4+6+5+4+4+5+4+8 = 40[/tex]

There are 8 numbers in the data set.

40 ÷ 8 = 5

The mean of the data is 5.

Order the numbers in ascending order.

4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 8

There is no exact middle number.

[tex](4+5)/2 =4.5[/tex]

The median of the data is 4.5.

'4' appears the most in the data set.

4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 6, 8

The mode of the data is 4.

Answer:

122.6 min

Step-by-step explanation:

3 miles = 28 min

13.1 miles=x

28min x 13.1 miles=366.8/3=122.6 min

Answer:

122mins

Step-by-step explanation:

3 miles take 28mins

Therefore the pace refers to the speed of travel and is 3/28

The new time of travel = distance /speed

= 13.1 / 3/28

=13.1 * 28 /3

=122.27

=122minutes

Answer:

The answer is "0.2"

Step-by-step explanation:

Given value:

factor = 10

The amount of two divided by the number of options. When both fours and eight gaps are available, that probability can be defined as follows:

[tex]\Rightarrow \frac{2}{10}\\\\\Rightarrow \frac{1}{5}\\\\\Rightarrow 0.2\\[/tex]

Answer:

well area is the space inside of a shape. so you would multiply 2 by 4 because there are 4 sides.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:  area is 10

Step-by-step explanation:

add top and bottom base

8+2=10

then divide by 2

10/2 = 5

then times 5 by 2

5*2=10

8+2/2 * 2 = 10

10 = area

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

First found amount yielded

A = P(1+r)^nt

P is amount deposited 50,200

r is interest rate 13% = 13/100 = 0.13

t = 3

A = 50,200(1+0.13)^3

A = 50,200(1,13)^3

A = 72,433.42939999998

A is approximately 72,433.43

interest = A - P = 72,433.43-50,200 = 22,233.43= 22,233 to the nearest GHS

Answer:

The null and alternative hypothesis for this study are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=18500\\\\H_a:\mu< 18500[/tex]

The null hypothesis is rejected (P-value=0.004).

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the average cost of tuition plus room and board at small private liberal arts colleges is  less than $18,500 per term.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the average cost of tuition plus room and board at small private liberal arts colleges is  less than $18,500 per term.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=18500\\\\H_a:\mu< 18500[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample has a size n=150.

The sample mean is M=18200.

The standard deviation of the population is known and has a value of σ=1400.

We can calculate the standard error as:

[tex]\sigma_M=\dfrac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{1400}{\sqrt{150}}=114.31[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{M-\mu}{\sigma_M}=\dfrac{18200-18500}{114.31}=\dfrac{-300}{114.31}=-2.624[/tex]

This test is a left-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

[tex]P-value=P(z<-2.624)=0.004[/tex]

As the P-value (0.004) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the average cost of tuition plus room and board at small private liberal arts colleges is  less than $18,500 per term.

Answer:

D ) the sum of the prices divided by seven

Step-by-step explanation:

The list below shows the prices of T-shirts at a clothing store.

{8, 10, 10, 12, 15, 15, 18}

( 8 + 10 + 10 + 12 + 15 + 15 + 18 ) ÷ 7

Which statement best describes the mean of this set?

D) the sum of the prices divided by 7

The statement best describes the mean of this set is the sum of the prices divided by 7.

Mean of a set of data is defined as the average of all the values. It gives the exact middle point of the data set.

Mean of a set of data can be found by adding all the values of the data set and by dividing by the total number of values in the data set.

Given data set is the prices of T-shirts at a clothing store.

{8, 10, 10, 12, 15, 15, 18}

Mean of the data set = Sum of the prices/ Total number of values

Sum of the prices = 8 + 10 + 10 + 12 + 15 + 15 + 18 = 88

Total number of value in the set = 7

Mean = 88 / 7 = 12.574

Hence the mean can be found by adding up all the prices divided by 7.

To learn more about Mean, click here :

https://brainly.com/question/30112112

#SPJ6

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We presume you want the values of x, y, and z.

__

There are two "special triangles" in geometry and trigonometry. They are the 30°-60°-90° right triangle that is half of an equilateral triangle, and the 45°-45°-90° isosceles right triangle that is half a square (cut by the diagonal).

The side ratios of these special triangles are relatively easy to remember. It is useful to memorize them.

__

For the isosceles right triangle, the side lengths are the same. The Pythagorean theorem tells you that if they are both 1, then the hypotenuse is ...

  √(1²+1²) = √2

That is, the side lengths of the 45-45-90 triangle are in the ratio ...

  1 : 1 : √2

__

For the triangle that is half an equilateral triangle, you know the hypotenuse is twice the length of the shortest side (since we got that short side by cutting a long side in half). Then the longer side can be found from the Pythagorean theorem:

  √(2²-1²) = √3

That is, the side lengths of the 30-60-90 triangle are in the ratio ...

  1 : √3 : 2

_____

In this problem, we're given the hypotenuse of a 30-60-90 triangle, so we know the short side of it (x) will be half that length:

  x = (16√3)/2

  x = 8√3

The hypotenuse of the 45-45-90 triangle will be √3 times x, so will be ...

  long side of small triangle = (√3)(8√3) = 24

The shorter sides of that 45-45-90 triangle will be this value divided by the square root of 2, so are ...

  y = z = 24/√2

We can multiply this by (√2)/(√2) to "rationalize the denominator".

  y = z = 12√2

Answer:

8\sqrt{3},\ 12\sqrt{2},\ 12\sqrt{2}

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

  (1 3/4, 2 1/2)

Step-by-step explanation:

The point of intersection is an "ordered pair." That means the order of the two numbers is important. The first number means something different than the second number.

So, if you want a reasonable estimate for (1.8, 2.6), you need to have the first number in the estimate be close to 1.8. The offered choices are ...

  1 3/4 = 1.75

  2 1/2 = 2.5

  1 1/3 ≈ 1.33

The closest of these to 1.8 is 1.75, so the first choice is the best choice so far.

__

The second number of the estimate needs to be close to 2.6. The offered choices are ...

  2 1/2 = 2.5

  1 3/4 = 1.75

  1 1/3 = 1.33

The closest of these to 2.6 is 2.5, so the first choice is still the best choice.

  A reasonable estimate is (1 3/4, 2 1/2).

Answer:

A: (1 3/4, 2 1/2)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Mean: 17

Median: 16

Mode: 10

Step-by-step explanation:

8, 10, 10, 11, 16, 17, 19, 21, 41

Median: (the middle number in the number list/data set) 16

Mode: 10

Mean: 8 + 10 + 10 + 11 + 16 + 17 + 19 + 21 + 41 = 153/9 = 17

The mean is equal to 17. The value of the median is 16 and the value of the mode is 10.

The mean of the numbers is defined as the ratio of the sum of the total numbers to the total count of the numbers.

The given numbers are,

8, 10, 10, 11, 16, 17, 19, 21, 41

Mean = ( 8 + 10 + 10 + 11 + 16 + 17 + 19 + 21 + 41 ) / 9

Mean = 153/9

Mean = 17

The median is calculated by arranging the numbers in ascending order and the middle term of the data.

8, 10, 10, 11, 16, 17, 19, 21, 41

The median is 16.

The mode is calculated as the highest repetition in the data,

8, 10, 10, 11, 16, 17, 19, 21, 41

Mode: 10

Therefore, the mean is equal to 17. The value of the median is 16 and the value of the mode is 10.

To know more about the mean, mode and median follow

https://brainly.com/question/14532771

#SPJ2

Answer:

(B) [tex]f(x)=-3(x+1)(x-5)[/tex]

x=5

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the three equivalent forms of f(x):

[tex]f(x)=-3(x-2)^2+27\\f(x)=-3(x+1)(x-5)\\f(x)=-3x^2+12x+15[/tex]

The form which most quickly reveals the zeros (or "roots") of f(x) is

(B) [tex]f(x)=-3(x+1)(x-5)[/tex]

This is as a result of the fact that on equating to zero, the roots becomes immediately  evident.

[tex]f(x)=-3(x+1)(x-5)=0\\-3\neq 0\\Therefore:\\x+1=0$ or x-5=0\\The zeros are x=-1 or x=5[/tex]

Therefore, one of the zeros, x=5

Answer:

i dont think the one above is correct. here is the correct answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

it will be 5 * 14 = 70 cm in real life scale

Answer:

~ 70 cm of the width of the actual item ~

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us plan out our steps, and solve for each:

1. Given the information, let us create a proportionality as such:

      1       =          14          ⇒   x - width of the actual item

      5                   x

2. Now let us cross multiply, and solve through simple algebra for x:

14 * 5= x,

x = 70 centimeters of the width of the actual item

Answer:

32?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Depends on how many spoonfuls of sprinkles per sundae. Is there more details to this question?

Answer:

a) We want to test the claim that 35​% of adults have heard of the new electronic reader, then the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.35[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p \neq 0.35[/tex]  

And is a two tailed test

b) [tex]z=\frac{0.334 -0.35}{\sqrt{\frac{0.35(1-0.35)}{1562}}}=-1.326[/tex]  

c) [tex]p_v =2*P(z<-1.326)=0.184[/tex]  

d) Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.35[/tex]  

e) Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.

Step-by-step explanation:

Information provided

n=1562 represent the random sample selected

X=522 represent the people who have heard of a new electronic reader

[tex]\hat p=\frac{522}{1562}=0.334[/tex] estimated proportion of people who have heard of a new electronic reader

[tex]p_o=0.35[/tex] is the value to verify

[tex]\alpha=0.05[/tex] represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic

[tex]p_v[/tex] represent the p value

Part a

We want to test the claim that 35​% of adults have heard of the new electronic reader, then the system of hypothesis are.:  

Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.35[/tex]  

Alternative hypothesis:[tex]p \neq 0.35[/tex]  

And is a two tailed test

Part b

The statistic for this case is given :

[tex]z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}[/tex] (1)  

Replacing the info given we got:

[tex]z=\frac{0.334 -0.35}{\sqrt{\frac{0.35(1-0.35)}{1562}}}=-1.326[/tex]  

Part c

We can calculate the p value using the laternative hypothesis with the following probability:

[tex]p_v =2*P(z<-1.326)=0.184[/tex]  

Part d

The null hypothesis for this case would be:

Null hypothesis:[tex]p=0.35[/tex]  

Part e

The best conclusion for this case would be:

Fail to reject the null hypothesis because the P-value is greater than the significance level, alpha.

Answer:

-40/41

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we know 'cos' involves the Adjacent and Hypoteneus sides, we will need to solve for the 'Adjacent' side of the triangle using the Hypoteneus Theorem.

41² = 9² + a²

a = 40.

However, this is in quadrant II, so when finding the 'cos' value, this side is -40.

Cosine is A/H, giving is:

cos(01) = -40/41

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

5(4)+ 3

20+3

23

Answer:

 |Z| = |-52.5|  = 52.5 > 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance

 Null  hypothesis is rejected

We rejected the researcher's claim

A researcher do not claims that 96% of college graduates say their college degree has been  a good investment.

Step-by-step explanation:

Explanation:-

Given data A researcher claims that 96% of college graduates say their college degree has  been a good investment.

Population proportion 'P' = 0.96

                                       Q = 1-P = 1- 0.96 = 0.04

In a random sample of 2000 graduates, 1500 say their college degree has

been a good investment.

Sample proportion

                       [tex]p^{-} = \frac{x}{n} = \frac{1500}{2000} = 0.75[/tex]

Level of significance  ∝ = 0.05

[tex]Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} } = Z_{\frac{0.05}{2} } = Z_{0.025} = 1.96[/tex]

Test statistic

                        [tex]Z = \frac{p^{-} - P }{\sqrt{\frac{PQ}{n} } }[/tex]

                        [tex]Z = \frac{0.75 - 0.96 }{\sqrt{\frac{0.96 X 0.04}{2000} } }[/tex]

                        [tex]Z = \frac{-0.21}{0.00435} = -52.5[/tex]

    |Z| = |-52.5|  = 52.5 > 1.96 at 0.05 level of significance

  Null  hypothesis is rejected

  We rejected the researcher's claim

Conclusion:-

A researcher do not claims that 96% of college graduates say their college degree has been  a good investment.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a(1) = 10(.1)^1 = 1

a(2) = 10(.1)^2 = 10(0.01) = 0.1

a(3) = 10(.1)^3 = 10(0.001) = 0.01

a(4) = 0.001

a(5) = 0.0001

Answer:

The probability that it came from A, given that is defective is 0.362.

Step-by-step explanation:

Define the events:

A: The element comes from A.

B: The element comes from B.

C: The element comes from C.

D: The elemens is defective.

We are given that P(A) = 0.25, P(B) = 0.35, P(C) = 0.4. Recall that since the element comes from only one of the machines, if an element is defective, it comes either from A, B or C. Using the probability axioms, we can calculate that

[tex]P(D) = P(A\cap D) + P(B\cap D) + P(C\cap D)[/tex]

Recall that given events E,F the conditional probability of E given F is defined as

[tex]P(E|F) = \frac{P(E\cap F)}{P(F)}[/tex], from where we deduce that

[tex]P(E\cap F) = P(E|F)P(F)[/tex].

We are given that given that the element is from A, the probability of being defective is 5%. That is P(D|A) =0.05. Using the previous analysis we get that

[tex] P(D) = P(A)P(D|A)+P(B) P(D|B) + P(C)P(D|C) = 0.05\cdot 0.25+0.04\cdot 0.35+0.02\cdot 0.4 = 0.0345[/tex]

We are told to calculate P(A|D), then using the formulas we have

[tex] P(A|D) = \frac{P(A\cap D)}{P(D)}= \frac{P(D|A)P(A)}{P(D)}= \frac{0.05\cdot 0.25}{0.0345}= 0.36231884[/tex]

Answer:

555 minutes

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

ooage booge ohag

Step-by-step explanation:

oomago ooga booga

Answer:

I got a universal translator and got "Hello in caveman goodbye in caveman"

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(1): -4.7 - 2.3x + 0.5 - 4x

(2):-5.3x-4.2-x

(3):-3.4-6.3x-0.8

Step-by-step explanation:

By Collecting like terms and adding the answer I get -6.3x - 4.2

(1):-4.7-2.3x+0.5-4x

Collect like terms

-2.3x-4x-4.7+0.5

-6.3x-4.2

(2):-5.3x-4.2-x

Collect like terms

-5.3x-x-4.2

-6.3x-4.2

(3): -3.4-6.3x-0.8

Collect like terms

-6.3x-3.4-0.8

-6.3x-4.2

Answer:

The first 3 are equivalent the last 3 aren't.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

129.3

Step-by-step explanation:

You have to find the number in the middle of all of the heights and multiply them by the all of the frequency (122x7 etc). When you have those answers, add them together and divide the answer by 40.

Answer:

121 km

Step-by-step explanation:

i added all the number together

Answer:Oop

Step-by-step explanation: