help please
thank you for your help

Answer:

only 3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

60% decrease

Step-by-step explanation:

To work out percentage change you takeaway the original number by the new number (New number-Original number) in this case 24-60=(-36), then divide the decreased amount by the original number and multiply the answer by 100 (Decrease amount ÷ Original number x 100) for this question you'd do (-36)÷60=(-0.6) then (-0.6)x100=(-60).

The minus shows its a decrease in percentage by 60%

(I hope this helps srry if it doesn't make sense)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

It is easy to see that (-2, 0) and (0, -4) are points on the line.

gradient = (difference of y-coordinates)/(difference of x-coordinates) = (0-(-4))/(-2-0) = 4/(-2) =  -2

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

36.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

36

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula to solve this is a+b)/2*h

4+5=9

9/2=4.5

4.5*8= 36

Answer:

c. 80,360

Step-by-step explanation: multiply the number of cases they make each day by the amount of pastries each case contains

Answer:

8 1/12 boxes

Step-by-step explanation:

Your first step to solve this problem is to convert those fractions to a common denominator. I would choose 12. So your first would be 4 4/12 and your second would be 3 9/12. You would then add those up and get 8 1/12 boxes of muffins bought at the bake sale.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

(5 dollars)/(4 girls) = (5/4 dollars)/girl = (1.25 dollars)/girl

:::::

(5.52 dollars)/(4 girls) = (5.52/4 dollars)/girl = (1.38 dollars)/girl

Answer:

We accept the null hypothesis, that is, that the population mean is not different from 0.7.

Step-by-step explanation:

A brochure claims that the average maximum height a certain type of plant is 0.7 m.

This means that the null hypothesis is:

[tex]H_{0}: \mu = 0.7[/tex]

A gardener suspects that this estimate is not accurate locally due to soil conditions.

Hypothesis test to determine whether the population mean is different from 0.7m, which means that the alternate hypothesis is:

[tex]H_{a}: \mu \neq 0.7[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

0.7 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.7[/tex]

A random sample of 43 plants is taken. The mean height of the plants in the sample is 0.65m.

This means, respectively, that [tex]n = 43, X = 0.65[/tex]

Assume that the population standard deviation is 0.2 m.

This means that [tex]\sigma = 0.2[/tex]

Value of the test statistic:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.65 - 0.7}{\frac{0.2}{\sqrt{43}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = -1.64[/tex]

Pvalue of the test:

Since we are testing that the mean is different of a value, and z is negative, the pvalue of the test is 2 multiplied by the pvalue of z = -1.64

z = -1.64 has a pvalue of 0.0505

2*0.0505 = 0.101

Using a 1% level of significance, perform a hypothesis test to determine whether the population mean is different from 0.7m.

0.101 > 0.01, which means that we accept the null hypothesis, that is, that the population mean is not different from 0.7.

Answer:

-60

Explanation:

6x(2x-5) always do what's in the parentheses first

6x(-10)

= -60

Answer:

40%

Step-by-step explanation:

Because there are 5 rectangle total, we can dive 100% into 5 parts.

Each part is then 20%, there are 2 shaded rectangles thus the answer is 40%.

Answer:

(x + 6)(x - 4)

Step-by-step explanation:

x² + 2x - 24

(x + 6)(x - 4)

-4 and +6 multiply to 24 and add to +2.

Answer:

m = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

4 x 2

you just have to multiply exponents

Answer:

1⅔

Step-by-step explanation:

Asking I'd say it's simply 5 apples divided by

the three of them to get 1⅔

Answer:

m=3/2 or m=1.5

Step-by-step explanation:

slope formula:

m=(y1-y2)/(x1-x2)

in order to get this we need two points such as (3,0) and (1,-3) which are points on this line. So:

m=(0-(-3))/(3-1)

m=3/2 or m=1.5

Answer:

The average price of each orange is $0.62.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that at a Beirut market, oranges are priced at $ 1.29 per kilo, and Ms. X buys 10 oranges that have a total weight of 4.82 kilograms, to determine what is the average price per orange that she pays must perform the following calculation:

(4.82 x 1.29) / 10 = X

6.21 / 10 = X

0.62 = X

Thus, the average price of each orange is $ 0.62.

Answer:

I think yes but it could be no. Sorry if I am wrong but it should be yes.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

   o--------------------------->

[tex]<------------>\\ -25 -24 -23 -22 -21 -20[/tex]

> means an open circle on -25, and a line pointing to the right because it's greater than.

Options C and D number lines show a graph of the inequality x > -25 that lies on the positive side.

Inequality is defined as the relation which makes a non-equal comparison between two given functions.

We have given a condition we need to find which number line shows a graph of the inequality x > -25.

We can see in the graph that the number line of options 1 and 2 doesn't show the inequality x > -25 because the point lies on the negative side of the number line.

But the number line in the options C and D shows the inequality x > -25.

Learn more about inequality ;

https://brainly.com/question/20383699

Answer:

Open circle going right. <-- graphed

Step-by-step explanation:

1billion is the correct answerStep-by-step explanation:

(a)

[tex]\displaystyle\int_3^\infty \frac{\mathrm dx}{x^2+9}=\lim_{b\to\infty}\int_{x=3}^{x=b}\frac{\mathrm dx}{x^2+9}[/tex]

Substitute x = 3 tan(t ) and dx = 3 sec²(t ) dt :

[tex]\displaystyle\lim_{b\to\infty}\int_{t=\arctan(1)}^{t=\arctan\left(\frac b3\right)}\frac{3\sec^2(t)}{(3\tan(t))^2+9}\,\mathrm dt=\frac13\lim_{b\to\infty}\int_{t=\arctan(1)}^{t=\arctan\left(\frac b3\right)}\mathrm dt[/tex]

[tex]=\displaystyle \frac13 \lim_{b\to\infty}\left(\arctan\left(\frac b3\right)-\arctan(1)\right)=\boxed{\dfrac\pi{12}}[/tex]

(b) The series

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{n=3}^\infty \frac1{n^2+9}[/tex]

converges by comparison to the convergent p-series,

[tex]\displaystyle\sum_{n=3}^\infty\frac1{n^2}[/tex]

(c) The series

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n (n^2+9)}{e^n}[/tex]

converges absolutely, since

[tex]\displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left|\frac{(-1)^n (n^2+9)}{e^n}\right|=\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{n^2+9}{e^n} < \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{n^2}{e^n} < \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac1{e^n}=\frac1{e-1}[/tex]

That is, ∑ (-1)ⁿ (n ² + 9)/eⁿ converges absolutely because ∑ |(-1)ⁿ (n ² + 9)/eⁿ| = ∑ (n ² + 9)/eⁿ in turn converges by comparison to a geometric series.

Answer:

yes and no a.a

Step-by-step explanation:

Car A travels the fastest on 1 gallon of gas.

The unitary method is a method for solving a problem by the first value of a single unit and then finding the value by multiplying the single value. The unitary method is a technique by which we find the value of a single unit from the value of multiple devices and the value of more than one unit from the value of a single unit. It is a method that we use for most of the calculations in math.

Given that car, the magazine reports the numbers of miles driven for different amounts of fas for Three car.

Consider us solving for the miles per gallon of individual cars

A. miles driven =140

A gallons= 5

x= 140/5

x= 28 miles per gallon

To learn more about the unitary method, please visit the link given below;

https://brainly.com/question/23423168

#SPJ5

Answer:

The average cost of a cat's annual visit is about $23.71 less at A New Leash on Life Animal Clinic than the average cost for a cat's annual visit at No Ruff Stuff Animal Hospital.

Explanation:

As you can see from the data and graph given, the Mean is essentially the average cost and $101.13 (New Leash on Life) is $23.71 less than $121.84 (No Ruff Stuff Animal Hospital).

Answer:

7.96

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

When finding out which number is the greatest, I would convert these numbers to numerals with decimals for easier comparison.

3[tex]\sqrt{5}[/tex] is approximately 6.71.

6[tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex] is 6.25

6.55 is, well 6.55.

From here, we can tell that 6.71 is the greatest, followed by 6.55 and 6.25 is the smallest. Thus, the order in descending order should be 3[tex]\sqrt{5}[/tex], 6.55 then 6[tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex], which is Option A.