Heyy , can you help me do this question

Step-by-step explanation:

3(10000) + 1700 - 20

30000 + 1700 - 20

31680

(first base + second base)x height ÷ 2

Answer:

x = 7

Step-by-step explanation:

If u // v, then

19x - 3 = 130   {Corresponding angles are congruent}

19x = 130 + 3

19x = 133

x = 133/19

x = 7

Answer:

Yes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Because

6*4 =24

and 4*0 = 0,

24+0=24

have a nice day!!!

Reproduce the proof. When n = 1, we have

n³ + 2n = 1³ + 2 = 3

which is clearly divisible by 3.

Assume n³ + 2n is divisible by 3. Then for the next natural number n + 1, we have

(n + 1)³ + 2 (n + 1) = n³ + 3n² + 3n + 1 + 2n + 2

= n³ + 2n + 3 (n² + n + 1)

The first two terms n³ + 2n are divisible by 3 according to our assumption, and 3 (n² + n + 1) is clearly a multiple of, and therefore divisible by, 3 as well.

So the claim that 3 divides n³ + 2n is true for all natural numbers n.

Answer:

1.5x+2y=total cost

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Slope of the parrelel line: -2/3x

Slope of the perpendicular line: 3/2x

Step-by-step explanation:

Lets first put this into slope intercept form:

y = mx + b

9y = -6x - 1

y = -2/3x = 1/9

So our slope is -2/3x

If we have a line parrelel to this, it means it has the exact same slope, but a different b value.

So the slope of this parellel line would also be -2/3x

Next we need to find the slope of the perpendicular line.

This is the exact opposite of our slope.

To find this, lets first understand our slope.

Our slope is the change in y over the change in x:

Δy/Δx

A perpendicular line is going to be the flipped, and negative of this.

You can think of a perpendicular line being:

-Δx/Δy

Since our slope is -2/3x

Our perpendicular line would be 3/2x

So our answer for the second question is 3/2x

Useful things to remember:

Hope this helps!

Answer:

d

Step-by-step explanation:

do 6 times 6

Answer:

The leading coefficient of the function shown is negative and the function shown has a maximum vertex point.

Step-by-step explanation:

The leading coefficient is the term with the highest degree in a polynomial.

For example in 4x² + 3x + 1 the leading coefficient would be 4x² as 4x² is the term with the highest degree.

The leading coefficient tells us whether the equation, when graphed, will rise or fall.

If the leading coefficient is negative then the equation will fall when graphed, in contrast if the leading coefficient is positive the equation will rise when graphed.

Looking at the graph, it appears that the equation is falling, meaning that the leading coefficient must be negative.

If the equation falls then it has a maximum point, if it rises then it has a minimum point.

Because the equation shown falls it will have a maximum point.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

m∠O = 80°

Step-by-step explanation:

m∠O = 4x - 20

m∠Q = 3x + 5

m∠O and m∠Q are congruent

4x - 20 = 3x + 5

Solve for x = 25

Plug back in

m∠O = 4(25) - 20

m∠O = 100 - 20

m∠O = 80°

Answer:

The second table with all values of x = -5 does not represent a function. what the function and input value of x will return one and only one value for y. and this table when you input a value for x of -5 you get three different values therefore this table does not represent a function

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The table

x y

-5 1

-5 -2

-5 -5

does not represent a function, because for the same input (-5) there are 3 different outputs.

Compare this to the table

 x y

-5 1

-3 -2

-1 -5

in which all the inputs (x values) are unique (one of a kind) and each input has exactly one output (y value) connected to it.

Answer:

it's D. 265F

Step-by-step explanation:

subtract 136 by -129 and you get 265

Answer:

x = 7

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum of exterior angles in a polygon is 360°.

( 11x - 5 )° + ( 4x + 29 )° + ( 6x + 13 )° + ( 9x - 15 )° + 67° + 61° = 360°

30x + 22 + 128 = 360

30x = 210

x = 7

Answer:

The maximum value of g(x) is 3 greater than the maximum value of f(x).

Step-by-step explanation:

The function modeled by the equation, f(x) = - (x - 3)² + 9, represents a quadratic function in vertex form.  

The vertex form is given by: f(x) = a(x - h)² + k, where:

⇒ The value of a is the vertical compression or stretch factor, which essentially determines the width of a parabola. The value of a also determines where the graph of a parabola opens:

⇒ (h, k) = Vertex of the parabola.

Given these definitions, we can assume the following information regarding  the quadratic function,  f(x) = - (x - 3)² + 9:

The vertex form of an absolute value function is given by: g(x) = a|x - h| + k, where:  

⇒ The value of a determines the following:

⇒ (h, k) = Vertex of the absolute value function.

⇒ x = h represents the axis of symmetry.

The axis of symmetry is the imaginary point on the graph that intersects through the h-coordinate of the vertex, thereby dividing the graph into two symmetrical parts.

Observing the given table of values, especially how the y-values increasingly peak towards g(x) = 12, then decreases back down starting at g(x) = 8.  It is important to take notice of the y-values, as it represents the resulting output provided by the given input (x-value).  

The increasing, followed by the decreasing y-values imply that the graph must be facing downward. Since we specified that the maximum point provided by g(x) = 12, then it means that it is the vertex occurs at point, (1, 12).

Therefore, the maximum value of g(x) is 3 greater than the maximum value of f(x).  

Answer:

1)y=2x+7

2) unsure what the question is due to blur

3)y=3/4x-2

4)y=-2x

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1) (1,9) ; slope = 2

Point slope form:

y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)

y - 9 = 2(x - 1)

Slope intercept form:

y - 9 = 2x - 2

    y = 2x - 2 + 9

 y = 2x + 7

3) (-4 , -5)  ; slope = 3/5

Point slope form:

y - y₁ = m(x - x₁)

[tex]y - [-5] = \dfrac{3}{4}(x - [-4])\\\\\\y + 5 = \dfrac{3}{4}(x + 4)[/tex]

Slope intercept form:

[tex]y + 5 = \dfrac{3}{4}x + 4*\dfrac{3}{4}\\\\y + 5 =\dfrac{3}{4}x + 3\\\\y = \dfrac{3}{4}x +3 -5 \\\\\\y = \dfrac{3}{4}x - 2[/tex]

Answer:

1. y = 2

2. y = -3 + 5z, zeR

3. x = ^-10/3 + 3/2^y ^-2/3^z, yeR, zeR

Step-by-step explanation:

If you would like me to explain, comment on this answer!

Step-by-step explanation:

hrer do it this way

it is correct

(-9,6) and (-3,2) help pls

Answer : -12.8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Each dog has 4 legs, 2 ears and 1 tail, total of 7.

Number of dogs:

Answer:

x = 11

Step-by-step explanation:

∠ EAB = ∠ AED = 4x ( alternate angles )

∠ AEB and ∠  GEB are adjacent angles on a straight line and sum to 180° , so

∠ AEB + 125° = 180° ( subtract 125° from both sides )

∠ AEB = 55°

The exterior angle of a triangle is equal to the sum of the 2 opposite interior angles.

∠ EBC is an exterior angle of the triangle , then

∠ EBC = ∠ AEB + ∠EAB , that is

9x = 55 + 4x ( subtract 4x from both sides )

5x = 55 ( divide both sides by 5 )

x = 11

Answer:

1014

Step-by-step explanation:

Remember this formula to find certain terms in arithmetic sequences:

[tex]t_{n} =t_{1} +(n-1)d[/tex]

n = term number

[tex]t_{1}[/tex] = term #1

d = common difference

Sequence = 24, 34, 44, 54...

We are looking for term #100

So we do

[tex]t_{100} = 24 + (100-1)10\\t_{100} = 24 + 1000 - 10\\t_{100} = 24 + 990\\t_{100} = 1014[/tex]

Answer:

265

Step-by-step explanation:

you only need to do is simplify the expression.

Answer: The filled out chart is shown below.

===========================================================

Explanation:

For each row, we divide the number of locations over the population count. Treat the population values in millions. Something like 35.2 million means 35,200,000 which is the same as writing 35.2*10^6 when using scientific notation. I prefer to stick to scientific notation.

In the first row, they computed 1460/(35.2*10^6) = 0.0000415 = 4.15*10^(-5); the last entry of 4.15 for this row represents having 4.15 stores for 100,000 people. In other words, we chop off the 10^(-5) portion in 4.15*10^(-5). This is because the 10^(-5) portion represents "1 out of 100,000".

The other remaining rows are handled the same way. I'll show the steps for the second row

Like the previous row, each value is approximate.

Check out the table below. The stuff in gray represents the new entries that were previously blank.

Answer:

Michaels' proof is wrong. His second point says that ∠AKG ≈ ∠AKL with the Vertical Angles Theorem as his justification, which is incorrect. Angles AKG and AKL are not vertically opposing angles, but they form a linear pair, so in this case, Daniels's proof is correct. 

Step-by-step explanation:

Please correct me if I'm wrong :)

Answer:

it takes me 14 minutes to go to class