hi pls help me now i'll gibe you brainest,thank you​

Answer:

f ( -4 ) = 1024 + 8 + 9

Step-by-step explanation:

f ( x ) = 4x⁴ - x² + 9

If f ( - 4 ) then we get

f ( -4 ) = 4 ( -4)⁴ - ( - 4)² + 9

Expand the exponents

f ( - 4 ) = 4 ( 256 ) + 8 + 9

multiply the numbers

f ( -4 ) = 1024 + 8 + 9

Answer:

2.3

Step-by-step explanation:

if you mean √2.3×√2.3 then the answer is 2.3 because √2.3×√2.3= (√2.3)² and that square cuts the square root and what remains is 2.3 which is the answer.

Answer: x=52

Step-by-step explanation:

x+72=34+90

x+72=124

124-72=x

x=52

Answer:

The probability of picking a red marble first then replacing it and getting a black marble is 2/9. (The last option.)

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey there!

The probability of first getting a red marble is 1/3 since we have 1 red marble out of 2 + 1 = 3 total.

We put the marble back. The probability of then choosing a black marble is 2/3, since we have 2 black marbles out of 3 total.

So we get 1/3 * 2/3 = 2/9

The probability of picking a red marble first then replacing it and getting a black marble is 2/9. (The last option.)

Hope this helps, please mark brainliest if possible. Have a nice day. :)

Answer:

ans:

Match the metric measurement on the left with an equivalent unit of measurement on the right are as follows;

0.3 hectoliter       3 deciliters

0.03 liters             30 milliliters

30 centimeter     3 Deciliters

3000 Milliliters    0.3 Decaliters

A standard unit of measurement is a quantifiable language that describes the magnitude of the quantity.

Match the metric measurement on the left with an equivalent unit of measurement on the right is determined in the following steps given below.

1. 0.3 hectoliter = 0.3 × 10 = 3 deciliters

2. 0.03 liters = 0.03 × 1000 = 30 mililiters

3. 3 Centiliters = 0.3 Deciliters then 30 centimeter = 3 Deciliters

4. 3000 Milliliters = 0.3 Decaliters

Learn more about unit measurement here;

https://brainly.com/question/15402847

#SPJ2

Step-by-step explanation:

IN first triangle multiplier factor is 4

and IN second triangle multiplier factor is

[tex] \frac{3}{2} [/tex]

Answer:

since it's the lhs we are concerned about, i. e., Y axis, so it must be either up or down. now look at the question, it says 8x2 - (1), it means one lower value of y i. e., 1 unit down

Answer:It is shifted 1 unit down.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]y=\frac{5}{2}x-14[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there!

What we need to know:

1) Determine the slope (m)

[tex]y=\frac{5}{2}x-10[/tex]

In the given equation, [tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex] is in the place of m, making it the slope. Because parallel lines have the same slope, the line we're currently solving for therefore has a slope of [tex]\frac{5}{2}[/tex]. Plug this into [tex]y=mx+b[/tex]:

[tex]y=\frac{5}{2}x+b[/tex]

2) Determine the y-intercept (b)

[tex]y=\frac{5}{2}x+b[/tex]

Plug in the given point (-6,-29) and solve for b

[tex]-29=\frac{5}{2}(-6)+b[/tex]

Simplify -6 and 2

[tex]-29=\frac{5}{1}(-3)+b\\-29=(5)}(-3)+b\\-29=-15+b[/tex]

Add 15 to both sides to isolate b

[tex]-29+15=-15+b+15\\-14=b[/tex]

Therefore, the y-intercept is -14. Plug this back into [tex]y=\frac{5}{2}x+b[/tex]:

[tex]y=\frac{5}{2}x-14[/tex]

I hope this helps!

Step-by-step explanation:

here are the answers bae. Feel free to ask for more

Answer:

2.52m³

Step-by-step explanation:

volume=L x W x H

V=2 x 1.4 x 1.8

V=5.04

WE DIVIDE 5.04m³ by 2 to get 2.52m³

Have a nice day

Step-by-step explanation:

For Adding and Subtraction:

1. Find the denominator (bottom number) of each fraction to find the LCD (least common denominator).

1. Find the denominator (bottom number) of each fraction to find the LCD (least common denominator). 2. find the LCD.

1. Find the denominator (bottom number) of each fraction to find the LCD (least common denominator). 2. find the LCD.3. Find the new numerator (top number) for each fraction. To find the new numerators for each fraction, compare the denominator of each of the original fractions to the LCD and write down everything different about the LCD in the numerator of the fraction. (you should also consider using the letters "LCD" in the denominator instead of the actual LCD as it will be less tempting to reduce them).

1. Find the denominator (bottom number) of each fraction to find the LCD (least common denominator). 2. find the LCD.3. Find the new numerator (top number) for each fraction. To find the new numerators for each fraction, compare the denominator of each of the original fractions to the LCD and write down everything different about the LCD in the numerator of the fraction. (you should also consider using the letters "LCD" in the denominator instead of the actual LCD as it will be less tempting to reduce them). 4. combine the fraction by adding or subtracting the numerators and keeping the LCD. When subtracting, notice that the subtraction sign is moved into the numerator so it can be distributed later if needed.

1. Find the denominator (bottom number) of each fraction to find the LCD (least common denominator). 2. find the LCD.3. Find the new numerator (top number) for each fraction. To find the new numerators for each fraction, compare the denominator of each of the original fractions to the LCD and write down everything different about the LCD in the numerator of the fraction. (you should also consider using the letters "LCD" in the denominator instead of the actual LCD as it will be less tempting to reduce them). 4. combine the fraction by adding or subtracting the numerators and keeping the LCD. When subtracting, notice that the subtraction sign is moved into the numerator so it can be distributed later if needed. 5. simplify the numerator by distributing and combining like terms.

1. Find the denominator (bottom number) of each fraction to find the LCD (least common denominator). 2. find the LCD.3. Find the new numerator (top number) for each fraction. To find the new numerators for each fraction, compare the denominator of each of the original fractions to the LCD and write down everything different about the LCD in the numerator of the fraction. (you should also consider using the letters "LCD" in the denominator instead of the actual LCD as it will be less tempting to reduce them). 4. combine the fraction by adding or subtracting the numerators and keeping the LCD. When subtracting, notice that the subtraction sign is moved into the numerator so it can be distributed later if needed. 5. simplify the numerator by distributing and combining like terms. 6. Factor the numerator if can and replace the letters "LCD" with the actual LCD.

1. Find the denominator (bottom number) of each fraction to find the LCD (least common denominator). 2. find the LCD.3. Find the new numerator (top number) for each fraction. To find the new numerators for each fraction, compare the denominator of each of the original fractions to the LCD and write down everything different about the LCD in the numerator of the fraction. (you should also consider using the letters "LCD" in the denominator instead of the actual LCD as it will be less tempting to reduce them). 4. combine the fraction by adding or subtracting the numerators and keeping the LCD. When subtracting, notice that the subtraction sign is moved into the numerator so it can be distributed later if needed. 5. simplify the numerator by distributing and combining like terms. 6. Factor the numerator if can and replace the letters "LCD" with the actual LCD. 7. simplify or reduce the rational expression of you can. Remember, to reduce rational expressions, the factors must be exactly the same in both the numerator and the denominator.

To Multiply:

To Divide:

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

For multiplication and division, the denominator of the result is developed as part of the algorithm for performing these operations on rational expressions. For example, ...

  (a/b)(c/d) = (ac)/(bd)

  (a/b)/(c/d) = (ad)/(bc)

It is not necessary to make the operands of these operations have a common denominator before the operations are performed. That being said, in some cases, the division operation can be simplified if the operands do have a common denominator or a common numerator:

  (a/b)/(c/b) = a/c

  (a/b)/(a/c) = c/b

__

If the result of addition or subtraction is to be expressed using a single denominator, then the operands must have a common denominator before they can be combined. That denominator can be developed "on the fly" using a suitable formula for the sum or difference, but it is required, nonetheless.

  (a/b) ± (c/d) = (ad ± bc)/(bd)

This formula is equivalent to converting each operand to a common denominator prior to addition/subtraction:

  [tex]\dfrac{a}{b}\pm\dfrac{c}{d}=\dfrac{ad}{bd}\pm\dfrac{bc}{bd}=\dfrac{ad\pm bc}{bd}[/tex]

Note that the denominator 'bd' in this case will not be the "least common denominator" if 'b' and 'd' have common factors. Even use of the "least common denominator" is no guarantee that the resulting rational expression will not have factors common to the numerator and denominator.

For example, ...

  5/6 - 1/3 = 5/6 -2/6 = 3/6 = 1/2

The least common denominator is 6, but the difference 3/6 can still be reduced to lower terms.

If we were to use the above difference formula, we would get ...

  5/6 -1/3 = (15 -6)/18 = 9/18 = 1/2

Answer:

77,786.251

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]{ \tt{ w = 2hx - 11x}} \\ \\ { \bf{w = x(2h - 11)}} \\ \\ { \bf{x = \frac{w}{2h - 11} }}[/tex]

[tex]\implies {\blue {\boxed {\boxed {\purple {\sf { \: x = \frac{w}{(2h - 11)} }}}}}}[/tex]

[tex]\large\mathfrak{{\pmb{\underline{\red{Step-by-step\:explanation}}{\red{:}}}}}[/tex]

[tex]w = 2hx - 11x[/tex]

[tex]✒ \: w = x \: (2h - 11)[/tex]

[tex]✒ \: x = \frac{w}{(2h - 11)} [/tex]

[tex]\circ \: \: { \underline{ \boxed{ \sf{ \color{green}{Happy\:learning.}}}}}∘[/tex]

Answer:

8,889

Step-by-step explanation:

1 twig = 10 leaves

1 branch = 10 twigs = 100 leaves

1 trunk = 10 branches = 1000 leaves

1 tree = 10 trunks = 10,000 leaves

The complete tree has 10,000 leaves

The woodcutter cut off:

1 trunk = 1000 leaves

1 branch = 100 leaves

1 twig = 10 leaves

1 leaf

Total number of leaves that were cut:

1000 + 100 + 10 + 1 = 1111

Leaves left on tree:

10,000 - 1,111 = 8,889

Answer:

3b-1 = b-3

2b = 4

b = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

100/8 = 12.5 (s)

Step-by-step explanation:

hmm bro

Answer:

[tex]{ \boxed{ \tt{formular : { \bf{ \green{time = \frac{distance}{speed} }}}}}} \\ time = \frac{100}{8} \\ { \boxed{time = 12.5 \: seconds}} \\ \\ { \underline{ \blue{ \tt{becker \: jnr}}}}[/tex]

Answer:

161 speed of plain in still air

Mark in brainlist

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \frac{3}{2} \div 5[/tex]

[tex] = \frac{3}{2} \times \frac{1}{5} [/tex]

[tex] = \frac{3}{10} [/tex]

= 0.3 (Ans)

Answer:

3/10

Step-by-step explanation:

3/2÷5

3/2÷5/1

3/2÷10/2 ( LCM of denominators)

3/2×2/10 ( Reciprocal of 10/2)

3/10 (Cancelling 2 by 2)

[tex]f'(4) = 43[/tex]

Explanation:

Given: [tex]f(x)=5x^2 + 3x + 3[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle f'(x)= \lim_{h \to 0} \dfrac{f(x+h) - f(x)}{h}[/tex]

Note that

[tex]f(x+h) = 5(x+h)^2 + 3(x+h) + 3[/tex]

[tex]\:\:\;\:\:\:\:= 5(x^2 + 2hx + h^2) + 3x + 3h +3[/tex]

[tex]\:\:\;\:\:\:\:= 5x^2 + 10hx + 5h^2 + 3x + 3h +3[/tex]

Substituting the above equation into the expression for f'(x), we can then write f'(x) as

[tex]\displaystyle f'(x) = \lim_{h \to 0} \dfrac{10hx + 3h + 5h^2}{h}[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle\:\:\;\:\:\:\:= \lim_{h \to 0} (10x +3 +5h)[/tex]

[tex]\:\:\;\:\:\:\:= 10x + 3[/tex]

Therefore,

[tex]f'(4) = 10(4) + 3 = 43[/tex]

Answer:

The best point estimate for the mean amount of money spent for textbooks for all students at the College is of $121.60.

Step-by-step explanation:

Best point estimate:

The best point estimate of a population mean is the sample mean.

In this question:

The sample mean amount of money spent for textbooks was $121.60, which means that the best point estimate for the mean amount of money spent for textbooks for all students at the College is of $121.60.

Answer:

im doing the same one, i believe it is D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a- yes because corresponding sides are parallel and have lengths in the ration 4/3

Step-by-step explanation:

just did the test

Answer:

The future value is: RS 132867.075

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]PV = 75000[/tex] --- present value

[tex]r = 10\%[/tex] --- annual rate

[tex]n = 6[/tex] --- number of times compounded (3 years/ 6 months)

Required

The future value

This is calculated as:

[tex]FV =PV * (1 + r)^n[/tex]

[tex]FV = 75000 * (1 + 10\%)^6[/tex]

[tex]FV = 75000 * (1 + 0.10)^6[/tex]

[tex]FV = 75000 * (1.10)^6[/tex]

[tex]FV = 132867.075[/tex]

Hence, the future value is: RS 132867.075

Answer:

0.098 , 0.89, 0.98

Step-by-step explanation:

0.098 is the smallest, 0.98 is the closest to 1 so it's the biggest

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The angle is in the 2nd quadrant, where the sine is positive and the cosine is negative.

tan^2(θ) +1 = sec^2(θ) = (-9/4)^2 +1 = 97/16   ⇒   sec = -(1/4)√97

cot(θ) = 1/tan(θ) = -4/9

csc^2(θ) = cot^2(θ) +1 = (-4/9)^2 +1 = 97/81   ⇒   csc = (1/9)√97

sin(θ) = 1/csc(θ) = (9√97)/97

cos(θ) = 1/sec(θ) = (-4√97)/97

Answer:

We want to find:

[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\sqrt[n]{n!} }{n}[/tex]

Here we can use Stirling's approximation, which says that for large values of n, we get:

[tex]n! = \sqrt{2*\pi*n} *(\frac{n}{e} )^n[/tex]

Because here we are taking the limit when n tends to infinity, we can use this approximation.

Then we get.

[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\sqrt[n]{n!} }{n} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\sqrt[n]{\sqrt{2*\pi*n} *(\frac{n}{e} )^n} }{n} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{n}{e*n} *\sqrt[2*n]{2*\pi*n}[/tex]

Now we can just simplify this, so we get:

[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{e} *\sqrt[2*n]{2*\pi*n} \\[/tex]

And we can rewrite it as:

[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{e} *(2*\pi*n)^{1/2n}[/tex]

The important part here is the exponent, as n tends to infinite, the exponent tends to zero.

Thus:

[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{e} *(2*\pi*n)^{1/2n} = \frac{1}{e}*1 = \frac{1}{e}[/tex]

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

if |x| is 3 then x is either -3 or 3. Either way, the distance from 0 is 3.

Hole this helps! :)

Answer:

[tex]Width = 59[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

The above data

Required

The class width

To do this, we simply calculate the difference between the class limits of any one of the classes.

Taking 1187–1246 as a point of reference, the class width is:

[tex]Width = 1246 - 1187[/tex]

[tex]Width = 59[/tex]

Answer:

white

Step-by-step explanation:

if you cut the shape in half both ways it makes white take up a fourth.