Answer:
Fundamental rights of the European Union and international human rights.
Every person has fundamental rights.
They are rights that are stated in the Constitution of Finland.
They are basic values that are important for everyone.
The fundamental rights protect each person's freedom.
The government, municipalities or authorities may not take away a person's freedom.
An example of fundamental rights is that everyone has the right to life.
Everyone has the right to personal freedom and integrity.
Everyone has the freedom to move and to protect his or her private life.
Everyone has the freedom of speech and the freedom of taking part in meetings and being a member of an association.
Everyone's property is protected.
This means that you cannot take or destroy things that belong to an
other person.
The fundamental rights include economic rights, social rights and cultural rights.
Examples of these are the right to work and social security and the right to education.
The Constitution also protects equality.
The Constitution contains the right to take part in elections.
The Constitution gives every Finnish citizen the right to use his or her own language.
The Constitution also protects the environment.
Every Finnish person has legal protection.
It means that the laws protect their rights.
The European Union has a Charter of Fundamental Rights.
What was the
main idea and
supporting
arguments from
Old Major's
speech on
Animalism in animal farm?
What is a second-generation Japanese American called?
issei
nisei
desu
ossu
THE ANSWER IS B) NIESEI I JUST DIDNT SEE IT ON HERE SO IM ADDING IT
Answer:
Nisei
Explanation:
The first generation is Issei, desu is a japanese copula used to connect subjects with predicates, and ossu is a shortened japanese greeting.
Economists can use new technology to
Subjective measures are numeric or quantifiable while objective measures are based on the perceptions of the family members or therapist ?
True or false
The correct answer is False
Explanation
The word "subjective" is a concept that refers to the opinion or point of view of a person or group on a specific topic. While the word "objective" is a concept that refers to information or knowledge that does not include the opinion or point of view of its author, but rather focuses on the nature of a specific topic in general and specific. According to the above, the correct answer is false because subjective measures are not numerical or quantifiable but refer to an opinion or point of view and perceptions, while objective measures are not based on someone's perceptions but rather refer to numeric or quantifiable information.
enlightenment and the great awakening
The exercise of power as it relates to race in result a) prejudice b) discrimination c) racism d) violence
Answer:
C
Racism
Belief that there are distinct human races with inherent differences which determine their abilities, and generally that some are superior and others inferior.
HELP ASAP
APPLYING MAIN IDEAS
The unfair business practices of the Standard Oil Company were exposed by
A.Ida Tarbell.
B.Lincoln Steffens.
C. Upton sinclair.
d. Ida B. Wells.
Answer:
A. Ida Tarbell
Explanation:
The answer is Ida Tarbell
PLEASE HELP IM TAKING AN ASSESSMENT
what situation allowed authoritarian governments to flourish in the 1920s?
Answer:
URL copied to clipboard
As the one hundredth anniversary of the beginning of World War I approaches, one may encounter some rather strained attempts to compare the current global balance of forces to that in Europe in 1914. I recently visited several countries in south east Asia and a different comparison struck me, the similarities between now and the 1930s, weak democracies and strong dictatorships.
This comparison “jumped off the page” after a week in Bangkok, followed by several days in Hanoi - a journey from a country with weak and faltering formal democratic institutions to an apparently stable one with an authoritarian regime (bordering on a country with a considerably more brutal dictatorship, China).
In The Age of Extremes, Eric Hobsbawm argued that the conflict between capitalism and communism determined the course of the twentieth century. This confrontation of socio-economic ideologies without doubt dominated European and global history, especially after 1945. But another, inter-related confrontation that determined the course of the century was authoritarianism versus democracy. The capitalism-communism conflict seems but a moment of history for people in their forties and younger. However, the danger of a rising authoritarian wave is as imminent in the twenty-first century as it was in the twentieth.
In most countries of Europe in the 1930s the contest between authoritarian and democratic visions of society dominated the political struggle. The exceptions were Italy where the fascists had already established an extreme version of authoritarian rule, and Britain where a rigid class structure gave stability to superficially democratic institutions. By the middle of the decade, capitalist authoritarian regimes were clearly on the rise in Germany and much of central and eastern Europe (e.g., Hungary and Poland), as well as Portugal, with Spain soon to join the anti-democratic camp.
Indeed, in very few of the industrialised countries in the late 1930s did democracy seem the stronger trend. Among the large countries only in the United States was there an unambiguous shift towards strengthening popular participation. Ironically enough it was during the presidency of patrician Franklin D Roosevelt that trade unions asserted themselves as a major political force (which would not survive much past mid-century).
Now, well into the twenty-first century it is even more difficult to find a major country with vigorous and democratic institutions, certainly not in the United States nor in Europe. In the United States the confrontation between a well-funded right wing Republican Party and the middle-of-the road Democrat Party dominates politics, one doctrinaire and aggressive, the other muddled and vascillating. The anti-democratic trend is demonstrated by passage of laws restricting the right to vote in Republican controlled states, linked to the racist xenophobia of the Tea Party. In the White House sits a Democrat apparently unconcerned by a massively intrusive national security complex.
In Europe anti-democratic trends are if anything stronger. Britain probably has the most extensive video surveillance network in Europe (see recent articles in the Guardian), as well as legal restrictions on the right of assembly, designed to reduce public protests (as we find in Spain). In addition, the Conservative-dominated coalition government’s brutal attack on poor households receiving social support in effect legalises civil rights violations. Surveillance, attacks on the poor and the government fanning fears of immigrants combine to make a potent anti-democratic package.
On the continent pre-existing authoritarian tendencies enjoyed a quantum leap under the EU-wide austerity regime fostered by the German government under the cover of the European Commission. The unelected governments in Greece (2011-12) and Italy (2011-13) represent the most obvious and shocking examples of the authoritarian trend. Much more serious in the long term is the EU fiscal compact (officially named the Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union).
This treaty, which came into effect at the beginning of 2013, severely limits the authority of national parliaments to set fiscal policy. The treaty and additional measures demanded by the German government remove fiscal policy from public control (with monetary policy in the hands of the European Central Bank and beyond national accountability). This process in which major decisions are taken away from the electorate fundamentally undermines public faith in the democratic process.
Explanation:
Authoritarian governments were able to flourish in the 1920s because democratic governments were failing especially in the late 1920s and early 1930s. On top of that socialism was spreading which scared many people and authoritarianism seemed like a better option than democracy for stopping socialism.
What is an authoritarian government?Authoritarian government is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, reductions in the rule of law, separation of powers, and democratic voting. Political scientists have created many typologies describing variations of authoritarian forms of government.
Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military. States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have sometimes been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.
Minimally defined, an authoritarian government lacks free and competitive direct elections to legislatures, free and competitive direct or indirect elections for executives, or both.
Learn more about authoritarian, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30019371
#SPJ2
Sort each phrase to the country it best describes?
Answer:
East Germany had been formed from the area of Germany that the Soviet Union had occupied and so became a Communist state.
West Germany had been formed from the areas that Britain, France and the U.S.A. occupied so became a democratic capitalist state.
West Germany
Had a free market economy Privately owned businessesHad a democratic governmentEast Germany
Had a command economy Economy controlled by the Soviet Union Had a Communist government.You saw that some words were on the portrait. How did you interpret the words on the painting? How is interpreting words on an image different from interpreting words on a page?
Answer:
Reading words and symbols on a painting can be challenging because we must first comprehend the meanings of the symbols before connecting these meanings to the words to build a tale.
A painting is a kind of visual communication. We are confronted with a written text in literature, which is usually written in familiar words since we speak the language that appears on the page. Even though we can't see them, the characters we encounter in literature are usually recognizable human beings, and we can comprehend their dialogue because we've heard speech similar to theirs before.
When you look at a picture, you have to have a distinct set of expectations. An author can describe a landscape or a scene's setting, but an artist attempts to recreate it so that we can see it for ourselves. This raises challenges unique to painting, such as color, shape, texture, size, and the relationship between one group of figures or objects and another, all of which eventually coalesce into the work's style.
It is easier to read text on a page since they are organized in a logical manner. When an author utilizes descriptive words to appeal to the reader's bodily sensations, this is known as imagery. This aids the reader in comprehending what the characters are seeing, touching, tasting, smelling, or hearing, which helps to bring the story to life. When writing a story, authors choose their words carefully and decide how to structure them so that they are understood the way they desire. They not only aim to conjure pictures in the minds of their readers, but they also use the words on the page to establish patterns that lead to a deeper understanding of the text. This is what is referred to as language patterns.
In my view, when words are interpreted on a picture, the meaning is much enhanced since the image has a visual aspect to support it. To comprehend the message that the artist was trying to send, I analyzed the phrases painted on the artwork.
Explanation:
Answer:
Reading words and symbols on a painting can be difficult, because first we need to understand what the symbols mean and then connect these meanings with the words to form a story.
Reading words on a page is easier because they are arranged in an order that is easily understandable.
Tanks
· Machine guns
· Poison gas
· Flamethrowers
· Airplanes
These new military technologies resulted in a huge expansion of the military tactic known as trench warfare and made _______ the most deadly war up to that point in history.
a.
Vietnam
b.
World War I
c.
World War II
d.
American Civil War
Answer:
The correct answer is B. World War I.
Explanation:
A trench warfare is a war in which both sides have dug themselves opposite each other in trenches and other fortified positions, with the aim of halting the advance of the enemy, which culminates in a stalemate where neither side succeeds in breaking through the enemy lines. The best-known trench warfare is World War I.
In general, trench warfare is the result of technological advances that allow enemy soldiers to be killed faster than they can advance. For example, in World War I, repeating rifles, machine guns, and modern artillery made it possible to mow down soldiers in the open by bushes. However, as armies still moved largely on foot and horseback, they could not cross those same open battlefields fast enough to get close enough to the enemy and fire effectively at the enemy.
please please please question paper maths science social science answer please my friends
How long did it take Europe to "gobble up" virtually all Africa south of the Sahara.
The process of European colonization and the division of Africa among European powers took place during the late 19th century and lasted for several decades.
This period, known as the Scramble for Africa, began in the 1880s and continued until the early 20th century. European countries, including Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Italy, and Portugal, rapidly expanded their territories and established colonies across Africa. By the early 1900s, virtually all of Africa south of the Sahara had been colonized, marking the completion of European domination over the continent.
The exact timeframe of this process varied across different regions and countries, but it generally took several decades for Europe to assert its control over the majority of Africa south of the Sahara.
Learn more about European powers:
https://brainly.com/question/32006239
#SPJ2
What are Three effects of 9/11 and 2 examples of each effect.
Answer:
1. Ongoing Wars
2.Immigration and Deportation
3. Big surveillance
Explanation:
1. Less than a month after 9/11, U.S. troops invaded Afghanistan in an attempt to dismantle al-Qaeda — the terrorist group that claimed responsibility for the attacks — and remove the Taliban government harboring it. Our military involvement in Afghanistan, which continues today, has turned into the longest-running war in U.S. history. And although formal U.S. combat operations ended in late 2014, more than 8,000 U.S. troops are still there to stem the ongoing Taliban insurgency. The LA Times reports that as of August 25, 2014, 749 California service members from every corner of the state had been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
2. The Immigration and Naturalization Service and the U.S. Customs Service -- both formerly part of the Department of Justice -- were consolidated into the newly formed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The agency has overseen a massive increase in deportations; they have nearly doubled since 9/11. According to the Department of Homeland Security’s Yearbook of Immigration Statistics, there were roughly 200,000 annual deportations a year between 1999 and 2001. While that number dropped slightly in 2002, it began to steadily climb the following year. In the first two years of the Obama Administration (2009 - 2010), deportations hit a record high: nearly 400,000 annually. About half of those deported during that period were convicted of a criminal offense, although mostly low-level, non-violent crimes.
3. The U.S. intelligence state boomed in the wake of 9/11. The growth resulted in a marked increase in government oversight, primarily through a vast, clandestine network of phone and web surveillance. The exponential growth of this apparatus -- armed with a $52.6 billion budget in 2013 -- was brought to light when the Washington Post obtained a "black budget" report from Snowden, detailing the bureaucratic and operational landscape of the 16 spy agencies and more than 107,000 employees that now make up the U.S. intelligence community.
Hope this helps!
In what ways did America’s women lend an assist to the wartime labor shortage?
Answer:
A lot of women volunteered as American Red Cross workers in a variety of capacities, from making surgical dressings, masks, and gowns, operating servicemen's canteens to provide wholesome entertainment for soldiers and sailors, volunteering as nurse's aides in veterans' hospitals, and providing recreational.
Please give brainliest if this helped!!
What was a prominent cultural trait of Italian immigrants?
A. Political and economic gain was the paramount goal of Italian culture.
B. talian history and culture promoted a strong bond with strangers and the upper class members of society.
C. The family was the purpose of existence and thc heart of the social/cultural system.
D. Italian Catholics did not believe in the use saints as intermediaries to God.
Answer:
C. The family was the purpose of existence and thc heart of the social/cultural system.
Explanation:
Italian immigrants were very family-oriented to the point of making family the heart of their subculture. The reason is that Italians themselves are very family oriented in Italy and those who emigrated did not change this aspect of their culture.
This was also advantageous because families helped each other in such a difficult process as it is emigrating to a different country with very little or no property at all.
why the attitude toward the Etruscan rule changed over time.
Answer:
They saw them as honorable men.
Explanation:
class 6 sst ch diversity,how can people depend on each other
What caused the United States to adopt the policy of containment?
a desire to prevent prosperity in Germany
Soviet rejection of the Marshall Plan
the spread of communism across Europe
the spread of communism on several continents
Explanation:
The Truman Doctrine essentially meant giving money and weapons to enemies of the USSR. The Marshall Plan was an attempt to get all of Europe in debt to the USA and allow the Americans to dominate it. The American view was that the Truman Doctrine was stopping the continuing spread of Communism. please marks me as brainliests please for my effort...Answer:
C. the spread of communism on several continents
Explanation:
the guy above gave the answer, for those of you that are to lazy to read here ya go
Write instruction to recharge the mobile phone.
Which statement most accurately compares the United States' policies of
containment and détente?
A. Containment uncovered the weaknesses of the Soviet economy,
while détente showed the benefits of the Soviets' command
economy
B. Containment supported the decrease of tensions between the
United States and the Soviet Union, while détente heightened
tensions and almost led to war.
C. Containment increased tensions between the United States and
the Soviet Union, while détente sought to ease tensions between
the two countries.
D. Containment encouraged peace talks and international treaties,
while détente further involved the United States in conflicts and
proxy wars.
Answer:
I think the answer is C.
Explanation:
"However, tensions over the treatment of Jews in the Soviet Union let to a cooling of relations. In the late 1970s, President Jimmy Carter was supportive of arms limitations but at the same time approved increased military spending. His support of human rights and anger over the 1979 Soviet invasion in Afghanistan let to the collapse of détente and prepared the ground for a return to a more aggressive containment policy."
The statement that most accurately compares US policies of containment and detected is Containment Increased tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, while détente sought to ease tensions between the two countries. The correct option is c.
What is containment?Containment was a geopolitical strategic foreign policy pursued by the United States during the Cold War to prevent the spread of communism after the end of World War II. The name was loosely related to the term cordon sanitaire, which was containment of the Soviet Union in the interwar period.
As a component of the Cold War, this policy caused a response from the Soviet Union to increase communist influence in Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Containment represented a middle-ground position between détente and rollback. The basis of the doctrine was articulated in a 1946 cable by U.S. diplomat George F. Kennan during the post-World War II term of U.S. President Harry S. Truman.
As a description of U.S. foreign policy, the word originated in a report Kennan submitted to US Defense Secretary James Forrestal in 1947, which was later used in a magazine article.
Learn more about Soviet Union, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10173240
#SPJ5
Standing your ground is primarily about protecting an individual from criminal charges true or False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Labor legislation was most favorable to labor unions during the pe- riod (a) 1960–present (b) 1945–1959 (c) 1933–1945 (d) 1865–1933.
The correct answer is C. 1933 - 1945.
Explanation
In 1929 there was a world financial crisis that affected the great world powers like the United States. Therefore, the 1930s represented a challenge for President Franklin D. Rosevelt, who had to lead the economic reactivation after this crisis. For this reactivation, Franklin D. Roosevelt implemented the New Deal in which he included broad support for workers through laws such as The Fair Labor Standards Act of 19383 and the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933. These policies contributed to the strengthening of unions and labor rights over the next decade. So the correct answer is C.
Which invention provided manufacturers with a new source of power for machines?
Answer:
Steam engine Provided manufacturer's with a new source of power for machines
Why has April 15 come to be know as tax day ?
Answer:
To spread IRS workers' workload and aid taxpayers
Explanation:
When "Tax Day" was moved to April 15th in 1955, many changes were coming federally. Lawmakers at the time made a point to state that the change was meant to help taxpayers recover, and to aid the IRS by moving the deadline back further. Though, there is some speculation that another reason why it was changed was to let the government push back their own payment deadlines to earn more interest.
What does article 1, section 7 of the constitution explain?
Answer:
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
what is speed lathe machine
Answer:
A speed lathe is a lathe that does one or two operations really fast but is less versatile. It is a useful tool for machining parts and for other purposes.
What was the significance of the Brown v. Board of Education decision?
It ended school segregation forever.
It ended racist politicians' control over the South.
It solidified the advances of Plessy v. Ferguson.
It was the first major victory for civil rights.
discuss the benefits of applying the sociological imagination to individual troubles
How did the economies of the North, the West, and the South differ?
Answer:
The North was more industrial while the South was more agricultural.
Explanation:
The North was more industrial while the South was more agricultural.
This difference played out heavily in the US Civil War - while the South was better led, constant shortages of weapons and equipment, along with blockades of ports to prevent supplies from coming in, led ultimately to the South losing the war.
