Answer:
C. They paid people to kill the buffalo so the animals would not block
the tracks
Which words come to mind when you think about World War II? (Multiple choice)
1. Allies
2.Adolf Hitler
3.Harry S. Truman
4.Axis
5.Franklin D. Roosevelt
6.Pearl Harbor
worth 10 points!! :]
Which of the following events resulted from the assassination of President John F. Kennedy?
OA The Twenty-Second Amendment was passed to clarify succession.
OB A temporary commission was created to investigate the crime.
О с.
The Securities and Exchange Commission was formed for increase presidential security.
OD. A new executive department was created to protect people elected to public office.
Answer: B. A temporary commission was created to investigate the crime.
Explanation: I took the test.
The event that resulted from the as-sas-sination of President John F. Kennedy was B. A temporary commission was created to investigate the crime.
What is a Political As-sassination?This refers to the kill-ing of a politician or a head of state that is usually politically motivated.
Hence, we can see that after the ill-fated kil-ling of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, there was a panel set up to investigate the crime and whether the sho-oter acted alone.
Read more about John Kennedy here:
https://brainly.com/question/11133250
#SPJ6
what factors contributed to the type of economy that characterized the New South?
Answer:
Henry Grady, an Atlanta editor of the news media, used the New South. The concept of the New South was that after the Civil War, the region needed to develop and diversify its economy.
Explanation:
More investments were being sought in the region for railways, telegraphs, and canals. While this contributed to the economy, after the civil war, the area was still largely agricultural and depleted. The region was not subject to the same level of immigration as the North, and potential workers were devastated during the civil war.
The region also generated more opportunities for public education; the number of children to read and write increased by the turn of the century.
The New South is that, at least on paper, the former slaves had more rights. Although numerous towns passed regulations that made it a crime to leave or travel an Afro American, many former slaves were permitted to be active in these new industries.
Which of the following best defines genocide
Answer:
"The deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group"
Explanation:
That's the definition.
Good way to remember → "Geno" Can be Genetic/Born as.
So you're killing a large group from a place (nation), or how they were born (race).
QUESTION:
Which of the following best defines genocide?
ANSWER CHOICES:
◎ A. The idea that some people are either superior or inferior due to their ethnicity
◉ B. The murder of a large group of people due to their ethnicity
◎ C. The stripping away of people's rights due to their ethnicity
◎ D. The study and science of genetics and the origins of ethnicity
ANSWER:
B. The murder of a large group of people due to their ethnicity
EXPLANATION:
*This excerpt is directly from the Penn Foster reading material
The Holocaust
It's difficult to overstate the brutality and tragedy of the Holocaust. The Holocaust, which comes from the Greek meaning "sacrifice by fire," was the systemic, deliberate, state-sponsored killing of approximately 14 million people. Almost half of the victims were six million European Jews. The remaining half included Roma, people with mental and physical disabilities, prisoners of war, political and religious dissenters, and members of the LGBTQ community. Nazi Germany aimed to capture and imprison anyone who was a threat. People who spoke out against the Nazis, ethnic groups like the Roma, and religious minorities like the Jews did not have a place in Nazi society. As a result, they were transported to concentration camps to work, suffer, and die. The Jews were a target merely due to their heritage and beliefs, which made the Holocaust a genocide, the deliberate killing of a large group of people due to their ethnicity or religious beliefs. Adolf Hitler used Jews as a scapegoat for all the failings of the Treaty of Versailles and the Weimar Republic.
ADDITIONAL INFO:
Attention! PF students!
This is the CORRECT answer for the following exam!
Exam Lesson Name: Contemporary International Relations
Exam Number: 703381RR
[You can find me on Quizlet]
"Penn Foster - World History Lesson 6, Contemporary International Relations, EXAM Answers (703381RR)"
[kennedyanne82]
Have a beautiful day/night! (✿◠‿◠)
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
In the late 1840s, what challenges did Mexicans living in territory ceded by Mexico face?
Answer:
In the late 1840's Mexicans living in territory ceded by Mexico faced the challenge of having their families split across two nations.
Explanation:
What did jimmy carter do that was good or why was he a good president
Answer:
Good things he did: He established a national energy policy that included conservation, price control, and new technology. In foreign affairs, Carter pursued the Camp David Accords, the Panama Canal Treaties, the second round of Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT II), and the return of the Panama Canal Zone to Panama.
The Greatest Success: The Camp David Accords would become Carter's greatest foreign policy achievement.
WELL GOOD FOR YOU U LOOK HAPPY AND HEALTHY NOT ME, IF YOU EVER CARED TO ASK
i dont remember the rest
A factor that weakened the US economy following its initial surge was the unequal distribution of
Answer:
wealth
Explanation:
.
Answer:
b
Explanation:
2. Civil rights are enforceable rights or privileges guaranteed by the US Constitution or other laws or statues.
True
False
Answer: TRUE
Explanation:
Yes they are guaranteed by the United States Constitution and further guaranteed by the civil rights laws are passed in the 1950s and 60s as well as the civil rights act that was passed in the 1960s
(Civil rights act of 1964)
What are the new challenges global politics has been facing in the post-Cold War world?
Answer:
Explanation:
First, globalization has weakened nation states: Countries and individuals alike are exposed to unprecedented risks in the face of international capital. With the fall of the Berlin Wall and collapse of the Soviet Union, the Western capitalist world order saw a golden opportunity to sweep across the planet. Expansion of such an order was given the name of “globalization” in the mid and late 1990s. The generally shallow interpretation of globalization refers to the increasingly strengthened global connections and interdependence in economy, trade, transport and communications. But the insight of such scholars as Herbert Hart is especially worth notice, as he pointed out the essence of globalization is the global expansion of capitalist production and economic relations. In this sense, globalization obviously has a longer history, only that it had not become true to its name until after the Cold War. Globalization benefited many countries and individuals, but has at the same time brought about great risks: First is the extreme imbalance in distribution of the benefits, resulting in greater gaps between nations and individuals; second, capital’s easy penetration of national boundaries has also weakened countries’ capabilities for managing and coping with such a phenomenon, exposing individuals more directly to the control of international capital, rendering them helpless.
Second, Russia-West relations are difficult to ease. Their relations are in part extension of the confrontation between the US and Soviet camps, only that Russia is evidently in a more defensive position now. After the Cold War, the West has seen unprecedented success in expanding its own sphere of influence and security boundaries, the rapid expansion of the European Union and NATO in the former Soviet Union’s sphere of influence, in particular, has inevitably made Russia nervous. The West’s success has taken advantage of its triumph in the Cold War, and come with its long-standing arrogance. In complete disregard of Russian feelings, it has extended its sphere of influence to Ukraine, a core source of Russian pride. The reactions of Vladimir Putin on one hand reflect his individual personality, but are on the other hand natural Russian defensive responses to the overbearing West. Geo-strategic factors aside, cultural factors can’t be ignored in Russia-West ties. In Russia, there has been the long-standing debate and tension over whether the country belongs to the East or West. Europeans have shown universal refusal of Russia, believing that Russia isn’t a part of Europe. The latest meeting between heads of the Catholic and Orthodox churches in Cuba again brought to attention the convoluted relations between Russian and European civilizations. Their divergent values, rooted in differences in culture, civilization and system, have demonstrated profound impacts on bilateral ties, resulting in structural and psychological standoff that is difficult to reconcile. Russia’s refusal to back down on the Ukraine issue and subsequent Western sanctions against Russia have made it possible for Putin, who is good at manipulating nationalist feelings, to maintain relatively high approval ratings at home; in the face of Western sanctions and dramatic falls in international energy prices, it is within anticipation that Putin has chosen to seek a breakthrough by intervening in Syria.
True or False: President Johnson was impeached for violating the Tenure of Office Act, which he viewed as unconstitutional.
Answer: True
Explanation:
President Johnson had repeatedly clashed with Congress on the way forward with regards to the treatment of the newly freed African Americans and one such result was the passage of the Tenure of Office Act.
Under this Act, the President could not terminate the employment of a cabinet member unless approved by Congress. Johnson had been clashing with his Secretary of War, Edwin M. Stanton, who was liked by the Republicans who controlled Congress.
When the Johnson suspended Stanton without telling Congress they had him impeached for violating the Tenure of Office Act.
Was the Vietnam war winnable for America? A paragraph please
Answer:
Short answer: Yes.
Explanation:
The Vietnam War saw to the US's superior industrial, population, and military superiority, as well as the extensive usage of tactics and military industrial advantages. In fact, the Vietcong, even with the then USSR and Communist China's backing, was slowly losing grip and was losing at that point. However, the anti-war viewpoint became increasingly popular, as the reason for the US to join was inadequate at best, and the views of fighting another countries battle and seeing their own young men come home wrapped in the American flag' was unbearable to the US general public, therefore support was withdrawn. If the US continued to push after the Tet Offensive, then the US would have been able to claim the Vietnam War as a victory, rather than a strategic withdrawal, which led to the eventual demise of South Vietnam.
~
drag and drop each characteristics into the correct category
Answer:
Protagonist
Is often the story's main characterDoes mainly good things Is whom the readers root forAntagonist
Gets in the main character's wayIs often disliked by readersOften does bad thingsAnswer:
just here to say that the person above is correct :D
Explanation:
did it on edge
what are the 3 thing
Answer:
according to research;"The three important things in life are vitality, connection and contribution"
Native Africans kept failing in their resistance to save their lands . Was there any way for them to save themselves from being imperialized ?
Answer:
they didnt modernise their army.
Explanation: that's why their were not able to save the land
Nuclear power provides France with __________ of its energy. A. one-quarter B. one-half C. two-thirds D. three-quarters Please select the best answer from the choices provided A B C D
Answer:
The answer is D. three-quarters
name 3 accomplishments of
Hongwu No cut and paste
Answer:
The reign of the Hongwu Emperor is notable for his unprecedented political reforms. The emperor abolished the position of chancellor, drastically reduced the role of court eunuchs, and adopted draconian measures to address corruption.
How should the US respond when war breaks out between many countries, some of which are our allies?
Answer:
The US respond
Explanation:
There are several ways to deal with when war breaks out between many countries, some of which are our allies. Firstly, it is required to have a peaceful conversation with diplomats from countries to solve it by having compromises. When talks have no result, it became vital to enter into war to save allies nations and their citizens. The US will also supply weapons and other military goods that are necessary for the troops on the frontline.
What does the New York State stock exchange NYSE do?
Answer:
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is the largest securities exchange in the world, hosting 82% of the S&P 500, as well as 70 of the biggest corporations in the world. It is a publicly-traded company that provides a platform for buying and selling over nine million corporate stocks and securities a day.
Explanation:
can I play on a school basketball court after school hours in Connecticut
Answer:
whats?
Explanation:
No
__________________
national income introduction
Answer:
In common parlance, national income means the total value of goods and services produced annually in a country. ADVERTISEMENTS: In other words, the total amount of income accruing to a country from economic activities in a year's time is known as national income.
King Harshavardhana's death brought about numerous changes in the country's social, economic, political and cultural Life'. Explain any two political impacts of the death of Harshavardhana on North India.
Answer:
After his death ,the whole empire disintegrated into many small kingdoms due to the miserable economic condition and lack of proper administration by his weak successor. Harshavardhana death leads to political instability in north India.
Which two items explain why the Articles of Confederation were considered weak? It did not permit Congress to conduct foreign affairs. It gave too much power to the states. It provided for a very strong federal government. It did not allow Congress to issue currency. Reset Next
Answer:
It gave too much power to the states. It did not allow Congress to issue currency.Explanation:
When the framers of the Articles of Confederation designed it, they did not want a Federal government that would be too powerful. They therefore gave Congress reduced powers that would keep it subservient to states.
The states therefore had too much power. They could negotiate trade deals with each other and decided the amount of taxes they would give the Federal government. They could also issue their own currency which meant that this was another power that Congress did not have.
CAN SOMEONE HELP I WILL GIVE EXTRA POINTS
Answer:
2
Explanation:
The development of sustainable agriculture is what led ulana to leave hunting and gathering and start farming.
all the other answers were not mentioned in the text and the first answer is debunked last paragraph when ogg went cold tired and hungry from the variability of hunting/
Which verb correctly completes this sentence? La actriz ______________ los diálogos para la obra de teatro. A. baila B. actúa C. memoriza D. canta
What was the name of the new Independent party that ex President Roosevelt and what was the name of his progressive reforms program?
Answer:
The Progressive Party (often referred to as the "Bull Moose Party") was a third party in the United States formed in 1912 by former president Theodore Roosevelt after he lost the presidential nomination of the Republican Party to his former protégé and conservative rival, incumbent president William Howard Taft.
Compare and contrast the system of indirect colonial rule and
direct colonial rule in south East Asia. What were the pros and
cons for people being ruled in each system?.
The European colonialism is the practice of acquiring full or partial political control over other societies and territories and founding a colony, occupying it with settlers, and exploiting it economically.
What is colonialism?The colonialism is a political, economic, and social system in which one country or group of people dominates and exploits another country or territory.
This domination often involves the colonization of the territory by settlers from the colonizing country, as well as the imposition of the colonizer's political, social, and economic systems on the colonized population.
Colonialism has been practiced by various countries throughout history, but it is most commonly associated with the European powers that colonized much of the world during the 16th to 19th centuries.
Learn more about colonialism here:
https://brainly.com/question/19068421
#SPJ2
why did the US Congress pass an exclusion act in 1882 barring Chinese immigrants
what best reflects the views of the Republican Party in the late eighteen hundreds
ôi đã được hỏi trong các ý kiến \u200b\u200bmột câu hỏi rất thú vị về việc đảng Cộng hòa khác với đảng Dân chủ như thế nào. Đương nhiên, các nhà bình luận ngay lập tức được tìm thấy, người tuyên bố rằng tất cả là một và giống nhau, trong khi những người khác mâu thuẫn với họ. Thực tế là cả hai đều đúng, bởi vì nếu bạn nhìn vào Đảng Dân chủ và Cộng hòa theo quan điểm của một người nước ngoài, nếu bạn sống ở một quốc gia khác, không phải ở Hoa Kỳ, thì, đối với bạn, họ không khác, bởi vì bên ngoài họ có chính sách gần như giống nhau.
Những gì chúng ta đã thấy dưới thời Clinton, Bush, những gì chúng ta thấy dưới thời Obama - về nguyên tắc, chính sách đối ngoại cũng tương tự. Nhưng chính sách đối nội rất khác nhau, vì vậy đối với người Mỹ, có một sự khác biệt lớn giữa Đảng Cộng hòa và Dân chủ. Và hôm nay tôi sẽ nói về sự khác biệt này.
Tôi sẽ bắt đầu với những thứ hời hợt. Như nhiều người có thể biết, đảng Dân chủ tự do hơn, còn đảng Cộng hòa thì bảo thủ hơn. Nó được thể hiện như thế nào: Đảng Dân chủ tin rằng thời gian đang chuyển động, và đất nước, chính trị, con người nên phát triển, vì vậy Đảng Dân chủ ủng hộ nhiều điều mà đảng Cộng hòa không ủng hộ. Ví dụ như phá thai, hôn nhân đồng giới, quy định về vũ khí. Đổi lại, lý tưởng của những người Cộng hòa là nước Mỹ của những người sáng lập. Như đã được họ để lại, đất nước nên được phát triển. Do đó, đảng Cộng hòa ủng hộ nhiều hơn các giá trị lịch sử, bảo thủ hơn; hầu hết trong số họ chống phá thai, hôn nhân đồng giới; chống lại quy định của vũ khí. Đây là một cái nhìn hời hợt về Đảng Dân chủ và Cộng hòa và chính trị trong nước của họ.
Đảng Dân chủ dựa vào chính phủ và nói rằng nên chăm sóc người dân. Do đó, họ chỉ trích đảng Dân chủ và Obama vì đã phát triển chủ nghĩa xã hội và bình đẳng ở Hoa Kỳ. Và đảng Cộng hòa dựa vào mọi người và tin rằng mỗi người nên tự chăm sóc bản thân mình, rằng nhà nước nên cho phép mỗi người độc lập đạt được những gì mình muốn. Nếu bạn có sự kiên trì, thông minh, kỹ năng, thì bạn sẽ đạt được điều gì đó, nhưng nếu bạn không có nó, thì bạn sẽ sống kém. Đó là sự khác biệt lớn giữa hai lực lượng này.
Do đó, quan điểm về thuế: Đảng Dân chủ cho rằng cần phải tăng thuế cho người giàu và giảm cho người nghèo, nghĩa là cho người nghèo sống nhờ người giàu. Đảng Cộng hòa nói rằng thuế nên giống nhau cho tất cả mọi người, bởi vì tất cả mọi người đều bình đẳng; người giàu đã tự mình đạt được điều gì đó, người nghèo không đạt được điều gì vì bản thân mình.
Đảng Dân chủ cũng tin rằng nhà nước nên tăng mức lương tối thiểu, và đảng Cộng hòa chống lại điều đó, vì họ nói rằng điều đó sẽ can thiệp vào các doanh nghiệp nhỏ. Nếu nhà tuyển dụng không trả tiền cho nhân viên, thì điều này sẽ gây hại cho chính doanh nghiệp, nền kinh tế và đất nước trong dài hạn.
Tiếp tục chủ đề xã hội chủ nghĩa, tôi sẽ nói rằng đảng Dân chủ tin rằng cần phải tăng chi tiêu cho tất cả các loại chương trình xã hội, như tem thực phẩm, nhà ở ngân sách, v.v. Ngược lại, đảng Cộng hòa nói rằng tất cả những điều này phải được giảm bớt, bởi vì có rất nhiều gian lận trong khu vực này Nhiều người làm việc "một cách thường xuyên" và nhận được phiếu giảm giá dưới vỏ bọc của người nghèo; Nhiều người không tìm kiếm việc làm, nhận thất nghiệp (trợ cấp thất nghiệp) và sống bằng chi phí của người nộp thuế, v.v. Và đảng Cộng hòa ủng hộ thực tế là nếu bạn đã cắt giảm chi tiêu cho các chương trình xã hội khác nhau, bạn cần đưa ra một số quy tắc, luật lệ sẽ quy định việc nhận trợ cấp xã hội của mọi người để có thể kiểm tra những người đó sử dụng ma túy và những người này thực sự đang tìm việc.
1. What drew Americans to settle in the northeast region of Mexico?
Answer: D
Explanation: Cheap land prices drew americans to settel in the northeast rigion of mexico known as texas in the 1820s
