I need help with this

Answer:

f(x) = x^2 - 3x -10

Step-by-step explanation:

If the solutions are {-2, 5}, the factors of the quadratic are (x + 2) and (x - 5).

The equation is f(x) = (x + 2)(x - 5) = x^2 - 3x -10

Complete question is;

A manufacturer claims that the calling range (in feet) of its 900-MHz cordless telephone is greater than that of its leading competitor. A sample of 19 phones from the manufacturer had a mean range of 1160 feet with a standard deviation of 32 feet. A sample of 11 similar phones from its competitor had a mean range of 1130 feet with a standard deviation of 30 feet. Required:

Do the results support the manufacturer's claim?

Let μ1 be the true mean range of the manufacturer's cordless telephone and μ2 be the true mean range of the competitor's cordless telephone. Use a significance level of α = 0.01 for the test. Assume that the population variances are equal and that the two populations are normally distributed

Answer:

We will fail to reject the null hypothesis as there is no sufficient evidence to support the manufacturers claim.

Step-by-step explanation:

For the first sample, we have;

Mean; x'1 = 1160 ft

standard deviation; σ1 = 32 feet

Sample size; n1 = 19

For the second sample, we have;

Mean; x'2 = 1130 ft

Standard deviation; σ2 = 30 ft

Sample size; n2 = 11

The hypotheses are;

Null Hypothesis; H0; μ1 = μ2

Alternative hypothesis; Ha; μ1 > μ2

The test statistic formula for this is;

z = (x'1 - x'2)/√[(σ1)²/n1) + (σ2)²/n2)]

Plugging in the relevant values, we have;

z = (1160 - 1130)/√[(32)²/19) + (30)²/11)]

z = 2.58

From the z-table attached, we have a p-value = 0.99506

This p-value is more than the significance value of 0.01,thus,we will fail to reject the null hypothesis as there is no sufficient evidence to support the manufacturers claim.

Answer: There are 75 books.

Price of each book = $4.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x = Number of books in the box.

Then as per given,

Cost of x books = $300

Cost of one book = [tex]\$(\dfrac{300}x)[/tex]

Books left after giving 15 of them = x-15

Selling price of (x-15) books=  $330

Selling price of one book = [tex]\$(\dfrac{330}{x-15})[/tex]

Profit on each book= $1.50

Profit = selling price - cost price

[tex]\Rightarrow 1.50=\dfrac{330}{x-15}-\dfrac{300}{x}\\\\\Rightarrow\ 1.50=\dfrac{330(x)-300(x-15)}{x(x-15)}\\\\\Rightarrow\ 1.50=\dfrac{330x-300x+4500}{x^2-15x}\\\\\Rightarrow\ 1.50(x^2-15x)=30x+4500\\\\\Rightarrow\ 1.50x^2-22.5x=30x+4500\\\\\Rightarrow\ 1.50x^2-52.5x-4500=0\\\\\Rightarrow\ 1.50x^2-52.5x-4500=0\\\\\Rightarrow\ x^2-25x-3000=0\ \ [\text{divide by 1.5}][/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow (x+40)(x-75)=0\\\\\Rightarrow\ x=-40,75[/tex]

Number of books cannot be negative.

So, there are 75 books.

Price of each book = [tex]\dfrac{300}{75}=\$4[/tex]

So price of each book = $4.

Answer:

2.5 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8[2]×88888

Step-by-step explanation:

[8×8]=8[2]×88888

Answer:

Hey there!

The x coordinate would be -5.

Let me know if this helps :)

As we can see in the Graph,

y-coordinate = - 7

Answer:

3x18 = 3 (10+8) is an example of the commutative property of multiplication

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: commutative property of multiplication

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

75%

Step-by-step explanation:

75% of possibility to have gold coin

Answer:

The hypotenuse is the longest side in a triangle.

a^2=b^2+c^2.

14^2=9^2+c^2.

c^2=196-81.

c^2=115.

c=√115.

c=10.72~11cm

Answer:

No

It could be purely due to chance.

Step-by-step explanation:

A population is defined as the whole group which has the same characteristics. For example a population of the college belongs to the same college . But a sample may be an element of a population.

So it is not necessary for a population to have the same characteristics as the sample.

But it is essential for the sample to have at least one same characteristics as the population.

So we would not be correct in inferring that such a relationship also exists in the population.

It is a hypothesis which can be true or false due to certain conditions or limitations as the case maybe.

For example in a population of smokers some may be in the habit of taking cocaine. But a sample of cocaine users does not mean the whole population uses it.

It could be purely due to chance if we find out that there is a relationship between parents’ and children’s party identification in the population.

Answer:

 At the 5% level, BAOI can infer that the average time to complete does not exceeds 60 hours.

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

   The  population mean is [tex]\mu = 60 \ hr[/tex]

    The sample size is  [tex]n = 16[/tex]

    The  sample mean is  [tex]\= x = 68 \ hr[/tex]

     The  standard deviation is  [tex]\sigma = 20 \ hr[/tex]

The  null hypothesis is  [tex]H_o : \mu = 60[/tex]

The  alternative [tex]H_a : \mu > 60[/tex]

Here we would assume the level of significance of this test to be  

         [tex]\alpha = 5\% = 0.05[/tex]

Next we will obtain the critical value of the level of significance from the normal distribution table, the value is    [tex]Z_{0.05} = 1.645[/tex]

  Generally the test statistics  is mathematically represented as

           [tex]t = \frac{ \= x - \mu}{ \frac{ \sigma }{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

substituting values

           [tex]t = \frac{ 68 - 60 }{ \frac{ 20 }{\sqrt{16} } }[/tex]

          [tex]t = 1.6[/tex]

Looking at the value of t and  [tex]Z_{\alpha }[/tex] we see that [tex]t< Z_{\alpha }[/tex] hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis

   This means that there no sufficient evidence to conclude that it takes more than 60 hours to complete the course

So

   At the 5% level, BAOI can infer that the average time to complete does not exceeds 60 hours.

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\lim_{x \to 0} (csc(x)-cot(x))\\= \lim_{x \to 0}(\frac{1}{sin x}-\frac{cos(x)}{sin (x)} )\\=\lim_{x \to 0}(\frac{1-cos x}{sin x} )\\=\lim_{x \to 0}(\frac {2 sin ^2 \frac{x}{2}}{2sin \frac{x}{2} cos\frac{x}{2} } )\\=\lim_{x \to 0}(tan \frac{x}{2} )\\=\lim_{x \to 0}\frac{tan \frac{x}{2} }{\frac{x}{2} } \times \frac{x}{2} \\=1 \times 0\\=0[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello, please consider the following.

P(a) = 7 * a - 6

P(-x)= 7 *(-x) - 6 = -7x - 6

P(x+h) = 7 * (x+h) - 6 = 7x + 7h - 6

Hope this helps.

Thank you.

The values of the polynomial for the given expressions are:

P(a) = 7a - 6

P(-x) = -7x - 6

P(x + h) = 7x + 7h - 6

To find P(a), P(-x), and P(x + h) for the given polynomial P(x) = 7x - 6, we need to substitute the respective values of x into the polynomial expression.

1. P(a):

P(a) = 7a - 6

2. P(-x):

P(-x) = 7(-x) - 6

P(-x) = -7x - 6

3. P(x + h):

P(x + h) = 7(x + h) - 6

P(x + h) = 7x + 7h - 6

To know more about polynomial:

https://brainly.com/question/2928026

#SPJ2

Answer:

i think

x=6.77

y=11.33

Answer:

[tex]p = 2[/tex] if given vectors must be linearly independent.

Step-by-step explanation:

A linear combination is linearly dependent if and only if there is at least one coefficient equal to zero. If [tex]\vec u = (1,1,2)[/tex], [tex]\vec v = (1,p,5)[/tex] and [tex]\vec w = (5,3,4)[/tex], the linear combination is:

[tex]\alpha_{1}\cdot (1,1,2)+\alpha_{2}\cdot (1,p,5)+\alpha_{3}\cdot (5,3,4) =(0,0,0)[/tex]

In other words, the following system of equations must be satisfied:

[tex]\alpha_{1}+\alpha_{2}+5\cdot \alpha_{3}=0[/tex] (Eq. 1)

[tex]\alpha_{1}+p\cdot \alpha_{2}+3\cdot \alpha_{3}=0[/tex] (Eq. 2)

[tex]2\cdot \alpha_{1}+5\cdot \alpha_{2}+4\cdot \alpha_{3}=0[/tex] (Eq. 3)

By Eq. 1:

[tex]\alpha_{1} = -\alpha_{2}-5\cdot \alpha_{3}[/tex]

Eq. 1 in Eqs. 2-3:

[tex]-\alpha_{2}-5\cdot \alpha_{3}+p\cdot \alpha_{2}+3\cdot \alpha_{3}=0[/tex]

[tex]-2\cdot \alpha_{2}-10\cdot \alpha_{3}+5\cdot \alpha_{2}+4\cdot \alpha_{3}=0[/tex]

[tex](p-1)\cdot \alpha_{2}-2\cdot \alpha_{3}=0[/tex] (Eq. 2b)

[tex]3\cdot \alpha_{2}-6\cdot \alpha_{3} = 0[/tex] (Eq. 3b)

By Eq. 3b:

[tex]\alpha_{3} = \frac{1}{2}\cdot \alpha_{2}[/tex]

Eq. 3b in Eq. 2b:

[tex](p-2)\cdot \alpha_{2} = 0[/tex]

If [tex]p = 2[/tex] if given vectors must be linearly independent.

Answer:

$69,361.23

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] A = P(1 + \dfrac{r}{n})^{nt} [/tex]

[tex] A = 10000(1 + \dfrac{0.09}{2})^{2 \times 22} [/tex]

[tex]A = 10000(1.045)^{44}[/tex]

[tex] A = 69361.23 [/tex]

Answer: $69,361.23

Answer:

When a shape is congruent they are equal in shape, size, and measure. Although if a shape is similar they will be the same shape, but not the same size, instead they will be proportionate.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

CongruentCongruent figures are identical in size, shape and measure. SimilarTwo figures are similar if they have the same shape, but not necessarily the same size.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The summary of the statistics given include:

population mean [tex]\mu[/tex] = 15

sample mean [tex]\oerline x[/tex] = 13.5

sample size n = 16

standard deviation s = 6

The level of significance ∝ = 0.10

The  null and the alternative hypothesis can be computed as follows:

[tex]\mathtt{H_o: \mu = 15} \\ \\ \mathtt{H_1 : \mu \neq 15}[/tex]

Since this test is two tailed, the t- test can be calculated by using the formula:

[tex]t = \dfrac{\overline x - \mu}{\dfrac{\sigma }{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = \dfrac{13.5 - 15}{\dfrac{6}{\sqrt{16}}}[/tex]

[tex]t = \dfrac{- 1.5}{\dfrac{6}{4}}[/tex]

[tex]t = \dfrac{- 1.5\times 4}{6}}[/tex]

[tex]t = \dfrac{- 6.0}{6}}[/tex]

t = - 1

degree of freedom = n - 1

degree of freedom = 16 - 1

degree of freedom = 15

From the standard normal t probability distribution table, the p value when t = -1 at  0.10 level of significance, the p - value = 0.3332

Decision Rule: We fail to reject the null hypothesis since the p-value is greater than the level of significance at 0.10

Conclusion: Therefore, we can conclude that  there is insufficient evidence at the 0.10 level of significance to conclude that the population  mean μ is different than 15.

Answer:

1. C. The researcher must compute an estimated standard error for the mean difference score to compute a t statistics.

2. B. 10

3. A. 12

Step-by-step explanation:

The degrees of freedom is number of independent variable factors that affect the range of parameters. The degrees of freedom is the calculation of number values that are free to vary. The degrees of freedom is calculated by N-1. Standard error is the estimated deviation of standard deviation from its sample mean distribution.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the above figure is a right angled triangle we can use trigonometric ratios to find y

To find y we use tan

tan∅ = opposite/ adjacent

From the question

the opposite is y

the adjacent is 350 ft

Substitute the values into the above formula

That's

[tex] \tan(27) = \frac{y}{350} [/tex]

y = 350 tan 27

y = 178.3339

We have the final answer as

Hope this helps you

Answer: 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

288

Step-by-step explanation:

Area of two triangles=2(½bh)

=bh

=8×6

=48

For the rectangles=lb + lb +lb

l(b+b+b)

=12(8+6+6)

=12×20

=240

Total area=240 +48=288

Answer:

There is a positive correlation between these two variables.

Step-by-step explanation:

Positive correlation is an association amid two variables in which both variables change in the same direction.  

A positive correlation occurs when one variable declines as the other variable declines, or one variable escalates while the other escalates.

As the distance covered by the vehicle increases the amount of gas consumed also increases. Thus, the weekly cost of gas will also increase.

Thus, there is a positive correlation between these two variables.

Answer:

60 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x = number of pounds of grass seeds A

The number of pounds of grass seed B = 140 pounds

Total pounds of the resulting mixture = (140 + x) pounds

Rye grass A = 60% = 0.6

Rye grass B = 80% = 0.8

Total percent of mixture formed = 74% = 0.74

Hence, we have the equation:

0.6x + 0.8 × 140 = 0.74 ( 140 + x)

0.6x + 112 = 103.6 + 0.74x

Collect like terms

112 - 103.6 = 0.74x - 0.6x

8.4 = 0.14x

x = 60 pounds

Therefore, the quantity of the 60% mixture used is 60 pounds.

The manager of a garden shop mixes grass seed that is 60% rye grass with 140 pound of grass seed that is 80% rye grass to make a mixture that is 74% rye grass. How much of the 60% mixture is used?

Answer:

Solution : Option D

Step-by-step explanation:

The first thing we want to do here is isolate the cos(t) and sin(t) for both the equations --- ( 1 )

x = 5cos(t) ⇒ x / 5 = cos(t)

y = 2sin(t) ⇒ y / 2 = sin(t)

Let's square both equations now. Remember that cos²t + sin²t = 1. Therefore, we can now add both equations after squaring them --- ( 2 )

( x / 5 )² = cos²(t)

+ ( y / 2 )² = sin²(t)

_____________

x² / 25 + y² / 4 = 1

Remember that addition indicates that the conic will be an ellipse. Therefore your solution is option d.

Answer:

They will need 160 cans to make 5 lbs

32 cans for 1 lbs

Step-by-step explanation:

We can use ratios to solve

8 cans             x cans

--------------- = ---------------

1/4 lbs             5 lbs

Using cross products

8 * 5 = 1/4x

40 = 1/4 x

Multiply each side by 4

4 * 40 = 1/4 x * 4

160 =x

They will need 160 cans to make 5 lbs

8 cans             x cans

--------------- = ---------------

1/4 lbs             1 lbs

Using cross products

8 * 1 = 1/4x

Multiply each side by 4

8*4 = x

32 cans for 1 lbs

Answer:

32 cans per pound of aluminum

160 cans per 5 pounds of aluminum

Step-by-step explanation:

will make it short and simple.

8 empty cans can make 1/4 pound of aluminum.

therefore... 8 x 4 = 32 cans per pound of aluminum.

Number of cans to make 5 pounds of aluminum = 32 x 5

= 160 cans per 5 pounds of aluminum

Answer:

The probability that a particular firm selected has $1 million or more in income after taxes is 49%.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given a study of 200 computer service firms revealed these incomes after taxes below;

         Income After Taxes                  Number of Firms

           Under $1 million                              102

      $1 million up to $20 million                    61

           $20 million or more                          37      

                 Total                                           200    

Now, the probability that a particular firm selected has $1 million or more in income after taxes is given by;

Total number of firms = 102 + 61 + 37 = 200

Number of firms having $1 million or more in income after taxes = 61 + 37 = 98  {here under $1 million data is not include}

So, the required probability =  [tex]\frac{\text{Firms with \$1 million or more in income after taxes}}{\text{Total number of firms}}[/tex]

                                           =  [tex]\frac{98}{200}[/tex]

                                           =  0.49 or 49%

The probability that a particular firm selected has $1 million or more in income after taxes is 0.49 or 49%.

Probability means possibility. It deals with the occurrence of a random event. The value of probability can only be from 0 to 1. Its basic meaning is something is likely to happen. It is the ratio of the favorable event to the total number of events.

A study of 200 computer service firms revealed these incomes after taxes:

Income After Taxes Number of Firms Under

$1 million 102

$1 million up to $20 million 61

$20 million or more 37.

Then the total event will be

Total event = 102 + 37 +61 = 200

The probability that a particular firm selected has $1 million or more in income after taxes will be

Favorable event = 37 + 61 = 98

Then the probability will be

[tex]\rm P = \dfrac{98}{200} \\\\P = 0.49 \ or \ 49 \%[/tex]

More about the probability link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/795909

Answer: stratified

Step-by-step explanation:

In stratified sampling, you divide the population into subgroups, or strata, with similar characteristics, like here we have divided the population into subgroups that depend on their political alignment. This is used when you can expect that the results have a noticeable variation between the different subgroups. Usually, you want to have the same number of population for eac subgroup, but sometimes it is hard for different reasons (not enough people in one subgroup, for example)

In cluster sampling we also use subgroups, but the subgroup itself is the unit of the sampling, while in this case, we are randomly selecting individuals of the given subgroups.

So this would be a "stratified sampling".

Correction:

Because F is not present in the statement, instead of working on​P(E)P(F) = P(E∩F), I worked on

P(E∩E') = P(E)P(E').

Answer:

The case is not always true.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the odds for E equals the odds against E', then it is correct to say that the E and E' do not intersect.

And for any two mutually exclusive events, E and E',

P(E∩E') = 0

Suppose P(E) is not equal to zero, and P(E') is not equal to zero, then

P(E)P(E') cannot be equal to zero.

So

P(E)P(E') ≠ 0

This makes P(E∩E') different from P(E)P(E')

Therefore,

P(E∩E') ≠ P(E)P(E') in this case.

Let assume that the mean is 184 and the standard deviation is 6

Heights of men on a baseball team have a​ bell-shaped distribution with a mean 184 of and a standard deviation of 6 . Using the empirical​ rule, what is the approximate percentage of the men between the following​ values? a.166 cm and 202 cm b. 172 cm and 196cm

Answer:

P(156<X<202) =  99.7%

P(172<X<196) =  95.5%

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

Heights of men on a baseball team have a​ bell-shaped distribution with a mean of and a standard deviation of . Using the empirical​ rule, what is the approximate percentage of the men between the following​ values? a.166 cm and 202 cm b. 172 cm and 196cm

For a.

Using the empirical​ rule, what is the approximate percentage of the men between the following​ values 166 cm and 202 cm.

the z score can be determined by using the formula:

[tex]z = \dfrac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]z(166) = \dfrac{166-184}{6}[/tex]

[tex]z(166) = \dfrac{-18}{6}[/tex]

z(166) = -3

[tex]z(202) = \dfrac{202-184}{6}[/tex]

[tex]z(202) = \dfrac{18}{6}[/tex]

z(202) = 3

P(156<X<202) = P( μ - 3σ < X < μ + 3σ )

P(156<X<202) = P( - 3 < Z < 3)

P(156<X<202) = P( Z <  3) - P(Z < -3)

P(156<X<202) = 0.99865-  0.001349

P(156<X<202) =  0.997301

P(156<X<202) =  99.7%

For b.

b. 172 cm and 196cm

[tex]z = \dfrac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]z(172) = \dfrac{172-184}{6}[/tex]

[tex]z(172) = \dfrac{-12}{6}[/tex]

z(172) = -2

[tex]z(196) = \dfrac{196-184}{6}[/tex]

[tex]z(196) = \dfrac{12}{6}[/tex]

z(196) = 2

P(172<X<196) = P( μ - 2σ < X < μ + 2σ )

P(172<X<196) = P( - 2 < Z < 2)

P(172<X<196) = P( Z <  2) - P(Z < -2)

P(172<X<196) = 0.9772 -  0.02275

P(172<X<196) =  0.95445

P(172<X<196) =  95.5%