"If a = − 9 and b = − 6, show that (a−b) ≠ (b−a)."

Answer:

The z-score for this length is of 1.27.

Step-by-step explanation:

Normal Probability Distribution:

Problems of normal distributions can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the z-score of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the p-value, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

One-year-old flounder:

Mean of 127 with standard deviation of 22, which means that [tex]\mu = 127, \sigma = 22[/tex]

Anna caught a one-year-old flounder that was 155 millimeters in length. What is the z-score for this length

This is Z when X = 155. So

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{155 - 127}{22}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 1.27[/tex]

The z-score for this length is of 1.27.

It is the graph of y= x translated 7 units up.

+7 in the function means it crosses the y axis at +7

The statement correctly describes the graph of y= x + 7 is y= x translated 7 units up.

A point, line, or geometric figure can be transformed in one of four ways, each of which affects the shape and/or location of the object. Pre-Image refers to the object's initial shape, and Image, after transformation, refers to the object's ultimate shape and location.

We have a function y = x.

and, a translated function y= x + 7

Here, The plus 7 at the end will shift the graph 7 units up.

It also means the the function cut the y axis at +7.

Thus, It is the graph of y= x translated 7 units up.

Learn more about Transformation here:

https://brainly.com/question/17104932

#SPJ2

Answer:

[tex]Area = 123.55 m^2[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]Area = 1330ft^2[/tex]

Required

Convert to [tex]m^2[/tex]

To convert from square feet to square meter, we simply divide by 3.281^2

So, we have:

[tex]Area = \frac{1330}{3.281^2}m^2[/tex]

[tex]Area = \frac{1330}{10.765}m^2[/tex]

[tex]Area = 123.55 m^2[/tex]

Answer:

P

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we are looking at an f(x) graph where x is time and y is distance. Any time a graph is sloping we are either moving closer or further from the school. When there is a horizontal line, this means that there is no change in distance, thus Liam is waiting/standing still.

Answer:

a. P

Step-by-step explanation:

i took the test :)

Answer:

The statement is false

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

See comment for complete statement

Required

Is the statement true or false

From central limit theorem, we understand that a distribution is approximately normal if the distribution takes a sample considered to be large enough from the population.

Also, the mean and the standard deviation are known.

However, the given statement implies that the distribution will be normal depending on an underlying distribution; this is false.

Answer:

C) independent variable = age

dependent variable = reaction time in milliseconds

Step-by-step explanation:

The linear regression statistical test is best used for research experiment where there is a single dependent and one independent variable whjre both variables are numeric. In the given options above, the city of residence, gender, college major and political affiliation are all possible categorical variables and age, salary, miles driven and reaction time are all numerical variables. Hence, the best situation in which to use linear regression is a test where both the independent and dependent variables are either age, salary, reaction time or miles driven.

Answer:

13.4 cubic feet and 23040 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

In cubic feet =  13.3 ft^3 ...........or 13.33ft^3

In cubic inches = 23040in^3

Step-by-step explanation:

In cubic feet it becomes

4(5) = 20 feet ^2   ................but we need volume in feet

so 8 inches = .............2/3 of a foot = 0.666667

Answer therefore is   (4) x (5) x (0.666667) = 13.32ft^3

In cubic inches it becomes

4 x 12 = 48 inches

5  x 12  = 60 inches

and 8 inches

48 x 60 x 8 = 23040 in^3

We check by squaring the divider

23040/12^3 = 13.333

We only square and square again to find a cube but to square once we do this with area too.

Area 1. =  4 x 5 = 20 feet^2

Area 2. =  48 x 60 = 2880 in ^2  / 12^2 = 20

Answer:

B

substract the variables

Answer:

The test statistics will be "-0.876",

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

According to the question,

Level of significance will be:

= 0.05

Now,

The test statistics will be:

= [tex]\frac{\bar x-\mu}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n} } }[/tex]

By substituting the values, we get

= [tex]\frac{18.6-19}{\frac{3.1}{\sqrt{46} } }[/tex]

= [tex]-\frac{2.713}{3.1}[/tex]

= [tex]-0.876[/tex]

Answer:

number 1: no

number 2: no

number 3: no

Answer:

8:35

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

8:35

Step-by-step explanation:

-25+60=35

9h-1h(60 above)=8h

=8:35

Answer:

[tex]\sqrt{97} \\ \sqrt{9^{2}+4^{2} }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

z(max) =  2996.13  $

x₁  = 968      x₂  =  430       ( quantities of regular and Decaf coffee respectevely)

Total quantity of BN = 898 pounds

Total quantity of CM =  500 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

Cost of the beans

Brazilian natural   =  Price market + 10 %    =  0.47 + 0.047  

BN  Cost   = 0.517 $/lb

Clombian Mild      =  Price market + 10 %    =  0.62  +  0.062

CM Cost   =  0.682  $/lb

Composition of the coffee blend

Regular coffee     0.75 BN  +  0.25 CM

De Caf   coffee     0.40 BN + 0.60  CM

PRICES

Regular Roman  =  3.60  $

Decaf                   =  4.40  $

Production costs:

Regular Roman  =  0.80  $/lb

Decaf                   =  1.05  $/lb

Packaging costs:   0.25  $/Lb       both

Profit  =  Price  -  cost

Profit  of regular coffee  =  3.60 - 0.80 - 0.25 -Cost of bean

for regular coffee cost of BN + CM

BN   is :   0.75*BN cost  = 0.75*0.517  =  0.38775       and

CM  is : 0.25*0.682   =   0.1705

Profit  of regular coffee  =  1.99175  $

Profit for Decaf coffee  =  4.4 - 1.05 - 0.25 - ( 0.517*0.4 + 0.6*0.682)

Profit for Decaf coffee  =  4.4  - 1.30 - 0.616

Profit for Decaf coffee  =  2.484  $

Let´s call  x₁  pounds of regular coffee   and  x₂   pounds of Decaf coffee then:

 Objective Function is:  

z  =  1.99175*x₁  +  2.484*x₂      to maximize

Subject to:

Availability of beans for 1000 pounds of Regular coffee means:

750 pounds of BN  +  250 pounds of CM

Availability of beans for 500 pounds of Decaf coffee means

200 pounds of BN  +   300 pounds of CM

Then   750 + 200  =  900 pounds of BN

And     250 + 300 =  550  pounds of CM

Availability of beans for 1000 pounds of Decaf  coffee correspond to

0.75 *x₁  +  0.40*x₂  ≤ 900

Availability of beans for 500 pounds of Regular  coffee correspond to

0.25*x₁  +  0.60*x₂  ≤ 500

Then the model is:

z  =  1.99175*x₁  +  2.484*x₂      to maximize

Subject to:

0.75 *x₁  +  0.40*x₂  ≤ 900

0.25*x₁  +  0.60*x₂  ≤ 500

General constraints  x₁ ≥ 0      x₂ ≥   0  both integers

After 6 iterations optimal solution  ( maximum z) is

z(max) =  2996.13  $

x₁  = 968      x₂  =  430  

x₁   and  x₂  are quantities of  Regular and Decaf coffee respectively, to find out quantities of Brazilian Natural and Colombian Mild

we proceed as follows

Regular coffee is :  0.75*968 =   726 pounds of BN

Decaf coffee is :      0.40*430 =   172  pounds of BN

Total quantity of BN = 898 pounds

Regular coffee is :  0.25*968   =  242 pounds of CM

Decaf coffee is :  0.6*430  =  258 pounds of CM

Total quantity of CM =  500 pounds

Answer:

A. 8h=m

Step-by-step explanation:

$8* h= total money m earned.

Answer:

Third Choice - The graph of g(x) is the graph of f(x) compressed vertically by a factor of 3

Step-by-step explanation:

x^2 is the the parent function, so it opens up with a normal compression.

Any number > (greater than) 1 as a coefficient of x will lead to a vertical compression (narrower parabola), while any number < (less than) 1 as a coefficient of x will lead to a vertical stretch (wider parabola).

So, 3x^2 would have to have to be a compressed parabola.

I hope this helps!

Answer:

The graph of g(x) is the graph of f(x) stretched vertically by a factor of 3.

Step-by-step explanation:

A vertical stretch or shrink of a function, kf(x), results from multiplying the entire function by a constant, k.

In this case, g(x) equals 3 times f(x). If k > 1, then the graph will be stretched vertically (along the direction of the y-axis) by a factor of k.

So, the graph of g(x) is the graph of f(x) stretched vertically by a factor of 3.

Answer:

8 and 6

Step-by-step explanation:

Two numbers are such that their difference, their sum, and their product are to

each other as 1:7:24. Their product must equal what number?

:

Two numbers a & b

Let x = the multiplier

:

a - b = 1x

a + b = 7x

a * b = 24x

:

Add the 1st two equations

a - b = x

a + b = 7x

2a = 8x

a = 4x

or

x = .25a

:

a * b = 24x

Replace 24x; a = 4x therefore:

a * b = 6a

b = 6

;

Using the 1st equation

a - b = 1x

Replace b with 6 and x with .25a

a - 6 = .25a

a - .25a = 6

.75a = 6

a =

a = 8

:

Find the multiplier

a - b = x

8 - 6 = 2

:

Check this

a - b = 2 (1*2)

a + b = 14; (7*2)

a * b = 48: (24*2)

:

The numbers are 8 and 6; their products = 48

Answer:

18x2 is 36 but you have to minus it so the answer is 28.

Answer:

[tex] W = \frac {V}{LH} [/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Mathematically, the volume of a rectangular solid is given by the formula;

V = L * W * H

V = LWH

Making W the subject of formula, we have;

[tex] W = \frac {V}{LH} [/tex]

Answer:

d. Ad hominem

Step-by-step explanation:

A fallacy can be defined as a mistaken or false belief that are based on illogical arguments or reasoning.

However, a lot of people might actually think it to be true but it isn't. There are various types of fallacy, these include;

I. Black or white.

II. Non sequitur.

III. Appeal to moderation.

IV. Bandwagon.

V. Appeal to authority.

VI. Straw man.

VII. Oversimplification or hasty generalization.

VIII. Appeal to ignorance.

IX. Appeal to pity.

X. Ad hominem.

Ad hominem can be defined as a type of fallacy in which the motive, character, or some other aspect of a person is attacked rather than his or her position.

This ultimately implies that, Ad hominem is typically based on prejudices, emotions, or feelings rather than appealing to reason, intellect or substance.

In this scenario, John Bardeen's research work at the Advanced Institute for Physics has progressed so slowly that even his colleagues call him a plodder. As a result, the speaker concluded that it's prudent at present not to take seriously his current theory on how strings constitute the smallest of subatomic particles. Thus, the logical fallacy described above is an ad hominem because John's slowness in his research work is bone of contention for the speaker rather than analyzing and concentrating on his theory about strings.

Answer:

[tex]\dfrac{81}{70},\dfrac{82}{70},\dfrac{83}{70},\dfrac{84}{70},\dfrac{85}{70},\dfrac{86}{70},\dfrac{87}{70},\dfrac{88}{70},\dfrac{89}{70}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to find 9 rational number between [tex]\dfrac{8}{7}\ \text{and}\ \dfrac{17}{10}[/tex]

We make the denominators of both fractions same. So,

[tex]\dfrac{8}{7}\times \dfrac{10}{10}=\dfrac{80}{70}[/tex]

and

[tex]\dfrac{17}{10}\times \dfrac{7}{7}=\dfrac{119}{70}[/tex]

The rational number are:

[tex]\dfrac{81}{70},\dfrac{82}{70},\dfrac{83}{70},\dfrac{84}{70},\dfrac{85}{70},\dfrac{86}{70},\dfrac{87}{70},\dfrac{88}{70},\dfrac{89}{70}[/tex]

Answer:

the second one

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The right answer is "0.3193".

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the question,

Mean,

[tex]\frac{1}{\lambda} = 13[/tex]

[tex]\lambda = \frac{1}{13}[/tex]

As we know,

The cumulative distributive function will be:

⇒ [tex]1-e^{-\lambda x}[/tex]

hence,

In the first 5 years, the probability of failure will be:

⇒ [tex]P(X<5)=1-e^{-\lambda\times 5}[/tex]

                    [tex]=1-e^{-(\frac{1}{13} )\times 5}[/tex]

                    [tex]=1-e^(-\frac{5}{13})[/tex]

                    [tex]=1-0.6807[/tex]

                    [tex]=0.3193[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Frt7v6c87buhinjomp,l.;

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Refer to the attachment for the steps.

Answer:

28.6m

Step-by-step explanation:

this question is very incomplete. it requires a number of assumptions to give an answer. the main one - where is Bryan located relative to Anna ? I assume diametrically on the opposite side of the kite. because he has the steeper angle, it is clear that he is nearer to the kite.

so, I guess, we have to add his distance to the kite to her distance to the kite to get the distance between her and him.

but he could be on any point on a circle around the kite to have the same viewing angle, and we would have no clue about where on that circle.

as the other extreme alternative, he could be on the same line to the kite as Anna. and then we would have to subtract his distance from her distance.

but again, we assume he is exactly on the other side of the kite.

anyway, each person creates a right-angled triangle with the kite:

there is the direct line of sight as the base line or Hypotenuse (c).

there is the line on the ground from the person to the point on the ground directly under the kite as one side.

there is the line representing the height of the kite above ground as the other side. we let this start at the height of the eyes of the watching person.

and we assume that both persons are of the same height (so the height of the kite relative to their eyes is the same for both).

let's start with Anna.

the side a of Anna's triangle is

a = 20m

angle between a and c = 44 degrees

we know the angle between a and b is 90 degrees.

therefore the angle between b and c = 180-90-44 = 46 degrees.

now we use the law of sines :

a/sin(bc) = b/sin(ac) = c/sin(ab)

we know sin(ab) = sin(90) = 1

20/sin(46) = b/sin(44)

b = 20×sin(44)/sin(46) = 19.31... m = height of the kite

now to Bryan.

now we know his b (height of the kite) = 19.32... m

his angle between a and c is 66 degrees.

his angle between a and b is also 90 degrees.

therefore his angle between b and c = 180-90-66 = 24 degrees.

19.31/sin(66) = a/sin(24)

a = 19.31×sin(24)/sin(66) = 8.6 m

based on our assumption that they are standing opposite from each other in relation to the kite their distance is

20 + 8.6 = 28.6m

Answer:

the volume = 1152cm^2

Step-by-step explanation:

> The volume of cylinder =4 spheres

> Volume of sphere = v= 4/3πr³

> radius =6cm

volume of 4 spheres =

[tex]v \: = 4 \times \frac{4}{3} \times \pi \times {6}^{3} \\ \\ v = 1152cm {2} [/tex]

Answer:

the unused volume is 18095,57cm cubed

9514 1404 393

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

There are a couple of relations that are applicable to these questions.

__

The segment lengths relation tells us ...

  10x = 8×7 . . . . . . products of segment lengths are equal

  x = 56/10 = 5.6 . . . . divide by 10

__

The value of y° is the average of the intercepted arcs:

  y° = (85° +45°)/2 = 65°

_____

Additional comment

This diagram does not have enough information to allow computation of z. We would need to know the intercepted arc, or the length of the secant that meets tangent z.

Answer:

7sin

2

x+3cos

2

x=4

4sin

2

x+3sin

2

x+3cos

2

x=4

4sin

2

x+3=4

4sin

2

x=1

sin

2

x=

4

1

sinx=

2

1

or sinx=−

2

1

Step-by-step explanation:

TAKING THE POSITIVE ROOT x=

6

π

tan(

6

π

)=

3

1