Answer:
No
Explanation:
It's a room, not a living organism.
No its a dead room
Once you die in the living room, the room will die aswell
Your welcome
Which of the following best describes the shift to modernism in late-nineteenth-century European cultural and intellectual life?
The late-nineteenth-century European cultural and intellectual life was marked shift to modernism by a rejection of values and creative conventions, as well as a desire to experiment with new and ideas.
Modernism in the fine arts refers to a break with the past as well as a quest for new forms of expression. From the late nineteenth to the mid-twentieth centuries, modernism encouraged artistic experimentation, especially in the years following World War I.
Modernists felt an increasing alienation from Victorian morality, optimism, and convention in an era marked by industrialization, nearly global adoption of capitalism.
The roots of Modernism in the visual arts are often traced back to painter Édouard Manet, who, starting in the 1860s, not only depicted scenes of modern life, but also broke with tradition by making no effort to mimic the real world through perspective.
Learn more about European culture
https://brainly.com/question/17396096
#SPJ4
Which statements are true of the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States? Check all that apply.
All true statements about the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States. The attacks involved hijacking of four planes, and killed over 3,000 people. The attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists and were the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil in history.
What is hijacking?Hijacking is a criminal act in which a person or group unlawfully and forcefully takes control of a vehicle, aircraft, or other mode of transportation. It is typically done with the intention of stealing the vehicle or using it to commit other crimes. Hijacking is a serious crime that can lead to physical and psychological harm, as well as the loss of property. In some cases, hijacking can even lead to death. Hijacking is a form of terrorism and is illegal in most countries. To prevent hijacking, many countries have implemented strict security measures for air, road, and sea travel. These measures can include increased security checks, armed guards, and the installation of metal detectors.
To learn more about hijacking
https://brainly.com/question/3523284
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Which statements are true of the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States? Check all that apply.
A. It was the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil in history
B. The attacks involved hijacking of four planes
C. The attacks killed over 3,000 people
D. The attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda terrorists
BRAINLEST!!
How did US involvement in World War II permanently end the policies of isolationism
and contribute to the emergence of the country as a "superpower"?
Answer: The United States' direct involvement in WW2 ended isolationist policies through the sale of supplies and direct troop deployments into the European battle, which was previously known as simply that.
Explanation:
Would you say that Shaka the Zulu’s success in warfare was wholly attributable to the nature of his upbringing?
Answer: No
Explanation: Shaka the Zulu's success in warfare cannot be wholly attributable to the nature of his upbringing, although it undoubtedly played a significant role. Shaka's upbringing gave him a unique perspective on warfare and leadership, as well as a deep understanding of the social and cultural dynamics of his people. This enabled him to develop military tactics and strategies that were highly effective in the context of Zulu society.
However, Shaka's success in warfare was also due to his personal qualities as a leader and military strategist. He was a charismatic and inspirational figure, who was able to inspire loyalty and commitment in his followers. He was also a brilliant military strategist, who developed innovative tactics and techniques that allowed the Zulus to defeat much larger and better-equipped armies.
Additionally, Shaka's success was also due to a number of other factors, such as his ability to forge alliances with neighboring tribes, his skill in diplomacy and negotiation, and the Zulus' superior weapons and military organization.
Therefore, while Shaka's upbringing played a significant role in his success, it would be inaccurate to say that it was wholly attributable to this factor alone. A combination of personal qualities, military strategies, social and cultural factors, and other contextual variables all contributed to his success in warfare.
Which of these people groups FIRST developed a complex society in the region identified in the map?
what are the s.p.i.c.e outcomes at the end of operation overlord
Answer:La primera etapa de la llamada Operación Overlord del 6 de junio de 1944 -más conocida como el Desembarco de Normandía o Día D- cambió el curso de la Segunda Guerra Mundial.
Pero el operativo no hubiera sido posible sin una serie de innovaciones tecnológicas creadas específicamente para ese evento.
Explanation:
espero te ayude
TRUE/FALSE. the usa patriot act (2001) gives individuals more protection from governmental intrusion.
Answer:
Its false
Explanation:
The Jim Crow Laws had a huge impact on the Civil Rights movement because??
Answer:
The Jim Crow Laws were state and local laws in the United States that enforced racial segregation and discrimination against African Americans from the late 1800s until the mid-1960s. These laws had a significant impact on the Civil Rights movement for several reasons:
Legalized segregation: The Jim Crow Laws legalized segregation in all aspects of public life, including schools, public transportation, restaurants, and even restrooms. This created a separate and unequal society, where African Americans were denied basic human rights and opportunities.
Limited political power: The Jim Crow Laws limited the political power of African Americans by implementing poll taxes, literacy tests, and other barriers that prevented them from voting. This effectively silenced their voices and prevented them from advocating for their rights.
Sparked resistance: The Jim Crow Laws sparked resistance and protests from the African American community and their allies. Civil rights activists such as Martin Luther King Jr., Rosa Parks, and many others organized boycotts, sit-ins, and other nonviolent demonstrations to challenge these discriminatory laws and demand equal rights.
Led to federal intervention: The Civil Rights movement, fueled by the injustices of the Jim Crow Laws, eventually led to federal intervention. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 were landmark pieces of legislation that prohibited discrimination on the basis of race and removed many of the barriers that prevented African Americans from voting.
Overall, the Jim Crow Laws played a significant role in the Civil Rights movement by sparking resistance, highlighting the injustices faced by African Americans, and ultimately leading to significant legislative and social change.
Explanation:
#trust me bro #never wrong #warstep8 i need ur help bro
how did the persian wars change greek society ?
The Persian Wars were a series of conflicts fought between the Persian Empire and the Greek city-states in the 5th century BCE.
How the Persian war affected the Greek societyNational Unity: The Persian Wars brought the Greek city-states together and fostered a sense of national unity. Greeks from different city-states fought side by side against a common enemy, which helped to break down the traditional divisions between the various city-states.
Military Developments: The Persian Wars led to the development of new military tactics and technologies, which helped to make the Greeks more effective in battle. For example, the Greeks learned to fight in phalanxes (tight formations of soldiers), which allowed them to withstand the Persian cavalry charges.
Naval Supremacy: The Greek victory over the Persian navy at the Battle of Salamis in 480 BCE gave the Greeks control of the Aegean Sea and established their naval supremacy in the region.
Learn more about Persian wars at:
https://brainly.com/question/925997
#SPJ1
explain the history of "old imperialism" in Guyana and Venezuela
Guyana and Venezuela were both colonized during the period of "old imperialism" in the Americas. Christopher Columbus claimed Guyana for Spain in 1498, and the Spanish established settlements in the region, but were ultimately unsuccessful in maintaining a permanent presence. The Dutch established a colony in Guyana in the 17th century, which they called Essequibo, and the British also established colonies in the 18th century. Guyana remained a British colony until it gained independence in 1966. Venezuela was also colonized by the Spanish in the 16th century, with a focus on mining gold and silver, but they also established plantations and imported enslaved Africans to work on them. In the early 19th century, Venezuela gained independence from Spain, but struggled with political instability and economic challenges. The histories of both countries reflect the impact of "old imperialism" on these territories, including the exploitation of indigenous peoples, the importation of enslaved Africans, and the establishment of colonial economies based on plantation agriculture. These legacies continue to shape the social, economic, and political landscapes of both countries.
Why would the Nazis start taking over the civil service first in order to control the government
Answer:
Explanation:
The Nazis took over the civil service in order to control the government for several reasons. Firstly, the civil service played a crucial role in the day-to-day operations of the government, including the administration of laws, the collection of taxes, and the management of public services. By controlling the civil service, the Nazis were able to exert influence over the workings of government and ensure that their policies and agenda were implemented.
Secondly, the civil service was a symbol of stability and continuity in German society, and its members were seen as being non-partisan and committed to serving the state. By taking over the civil service, the Nazis were able to project an image of legitimacy and stability, which helped to reinforce their power and influence.
Thirdly, the civil service was an important source of information and intelligence, and its members had access to sensitive and confidential information about the government and society. By controlling the civil service, the Nazis were able to gather intelligence and monitor potential threats to their power and influence.
Finally, by taking over the civil service, the Nazis were able to remove potential opponents and critics from positions of power and replace them with loyal supporters. This allowed the Nazis to consolidate their control over the government and suppress dissenting voices.
Overall, the takeover of the civil service was a key step in the Nazi's efforts to control the German government and society, and it helped to pave the way for the establishment of their totalitarian regime.
Why did the Scientific Revolution happen in the West and not another world civilization?
Answer:
The Scientific Revolution happened in the West due to a combination of factors, including the development of new technologies, the encouragement of a questioning attitude towards established knowledge and beliefs, and increased access to higher education. In particular, the printing press allowed for the rapid dissemination of new ideas and accessible texts, while the rise of universities and academies allowed for the sharing of new knowledge and theories. The West also benefited from the influx of classical texts from the Islamic world and the Renaissance period, which provided the foundation for the development of new theories and scientific assumptions. Additionally, the West benefited from the emergence of nation-states, which provided the economic and political stability necessary for the growth of science and technology.
The Mediterranean region gave rise to a new form of slavery, called chattel slavery. Which of the following situations describes chattel slavery?
a wealthy merchant invests in 15 slaves at the local market, then rents them out to a copper mine fifty miles away and uses the income to help support his other business ventures
The situation that describes chattel slavery is: a wealthy merchant invests in 15 slaves at the local market, then rents them out to a copper mine fifty miles away and uses the income to help support his other business ventures.
Chattel slavery is a system of slavery in which an individual is recognized as a personal possession, chattel, or an article of trade or commerce. It is characterized by the legal right of the slave owner to possess, buy, sell, and otherwise dispose of a person as they would any other property.
In chattel slavery, the enslaved person is treated like personal property, with no rights, privileges, or protections. They are born, sold, and owned as property, and can be sold, inherited, or exchanged at any time, much like any other object.
In the given situation, a wealthy merchant invests in 15 slaves at the local market, then rents them out to a copper mine fifty miles away and uses the income to help support his other business ventures. This situation describes chattel slavery.
For such more question on business:
https://brainly.com/question/28187988
#SPJ11
HELP ME PLEASEEEEEE come up with 5 questions you have about interracial relationships from the Jim
Crow laws and answer those questions with at least 3 sentences each.
Please help, thank you
Answer:
1. What were the Jim Crow laws and how did they affect interracial relationships?
The Jim Crow laws were a set of state and local laws in the United States that enforced racial segregation and discrimination against African Americans from the late 1800s to the mid-1960s. These laws also prohibited interracial marriage and relationships, making it illegal for people of different races to marry or engage in sexual relationships. Violators of these laws faced severe punishment, including imprisonment and fines.
2. How did interracial couples navigate the legal and social barriers of the Jim Crow era?
Interracial couples during the Jim Crow era faced significant legal and social barriers. They often had to keep their relationships secret to avoid persecution and violence from the authorities and the public. Some couples chose to move to states where interracial marriage was legal, while others chose to live together without getting married. Despite the challenges, many interracial couples persevered and built strong relationships that lasted a lifetime.
3. What were the attitudes of different racial groups towards interracial relationships during the Jim Crow era?
During the Jim Crow era, attitudes towards interracial relationships varied among different racial groups. White people generally opposed interracial relationships, viewing them as a threat to the racial purity of the white race. African Americans, on the other hand, were more accepting of interracial relationships, seeing them as a way to challenge the racial hierarchy and promote equality. Some African American women even saw interracial relationships as a way to escape the limited dating pool of African American men.
4. How did the Civil Rights Movement impact interracial relationships during the Jim Crow era?
The Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s had a significant impact on interracial relationships during the Jim Crow era. The movement challenged the legal and social barriers that prevented interracial couples from marrying and living together openly. The landmark Supreme Court case Loving v. Virginia in 1967 struck down state laws that prohibited interracial marriage, paving the way for interracial couples to marry and live together without fear of persecution.
5. What lessons can we learn from the experiences of interracial couples during the Jim Crow era?
The experiences of interracial couples during the Jim Crow era teach us about the resilience and strength of human relationships in the face of adversity. Despite the legal and social barriers they faced, many interracial couples were able to build strong and lasting relationships that challenged the racial hierarchy and promoted equality. Their stories remind us of the importance of love, respect, and understanding in overcoming prejudice and discrimination.
Write an essay in which you discussed Social Darwinism and opposing views such as the Social Gospel or Settlement House movements and express your own point of view. ( MAKE SURE TO WRITE AN INTRODUCTION, BODY, AND CONCLUSION)
Answer:
Write an essay in which you discussed Social Darwinism and opposing views such as the Social Gospel or Settlement House movements and express your own point of view. ( MAKE SURE TO WRITE AN INTRODUCTION, BODY, AND CONCLUSION)
Explanation:
Introduction:
Social Darwinism is a term coined in the late 19th century, which refers to the application of evolutionary theory to social and economic systems. According to this theory, the strongest and fittest individuals, businesses, and nations survive and thrive, while weaker ones die off. Social Darwinism was embraced by many prominent thinkers and leaders of the time, who used it to justify their beliefs in racial superiority, imperialism, and laissez-faire capitalism. However, this theory was challenged by opposing views, such as the Social Gospel and Settlement House movements, which emphasized the importance of social welfare, equality, and cooperation. In this essay, I will discuss Social Darwinism and these opposing views, and express my own point of view on this topic.
Body:
Social Darwinism was a popular concept during the late 19th century and was used to justify racial superiority and imperialism. The theory argued that the struggle for existence applied not only to individuals but also to nations, and that the superior nations had a right to dominate the weaker ones. This idea was embraced by many European powers, who used it as a justification for their imperialistic activities in Africa and Asia. Similarly, in the United States, Social Darwinism was used to justify the exploitation of natural resources and the exploitation of workers by capitalists.
However, the Social Gospel movement emerged in response to Social Darwinism, emphasizing the importance of social welfare, equality, and cooperation. This movement advocated for the use of Christian principles to address social problems, such as poverty, inequality, and injustice. The Social Gospel movement believed that it was the responsibility of the government and society as a whole to ensure that everyone had access to basic necessities such as food, shelter, and healthcare.
Another opposing view to Social Darwinism was the Settlement House movement. Settlement houses were community centers located in urban areas, which provided services and resources to immigrant families. The movement was led by middle-class women who believed that the problems of the urban poor were caused by social, economic, and political factors. The Settlement House movement aimed to address these issues by providing education, job training, and social services to the community.
Conclusion:
Social Darwinism was a popular theory during the late 19th century, used to justify racial superiority, imperialism, and laissez-faire capitalism. However, this theory was challenged by opposing views, such as the Social Gospel and Settlement House movements, which emphasized the importance of social welfare, equality, and cooperation. While Social Darwinism is no longer a popular theory, its influence can still be seen in some political and economic policies. In my opinion, it is important to recognize that we live in a complex and interconnected world, and that cooperation and compassion are essential for creating a just and sustainable society. We must continue to work towards a society that values equality, justice, and social welfare for all.
Which of the following is NOT true of nuclear energy compared to coal or oil?
A. Radioactive waste is left from use
B. It is more energy efficient than coal or oil
C. It is more dangerous for people involved in its production
Answer:
The nucleus of uranium is bombarded with high energy neutrons.
Explanation: Nuclear energy is generated by splitting of uranium atoms
12. Which statement is accurate about the Hunley?
A Crew members could stand inside the Hunley easily.
B. The Hunley sunk two times.
C. The Hunley was the first submarine to sink another ship.
The Hunley sunk three ships throughout the Civil War.
ddle
The statement that is accurate about the Hunley is C. The Hunley was the first submarine to sink another ship.
About hunley -During the American Civil War, the CSS Hunley was a submarine built in the Confederate States of America. It was constructed during 1863 and 1864 by a team of engineers led by Horace Lawson Hunley. The Hunley is known for being the first submarine to successfully sink an enemy warship, the USS Housatonic, on February 17, 1864, off the coast of Charleston, South Carolina. The Hunley also sank twice before the successful attack on the Housatonic, claiming the lives of all crew members on both occasions.
To know more about hunley -
https://brainly.com/question/30282888
#SPJ1
Which of the following American philosophies influenced Herbert Hoover's initial response to the economic downturn in the early 1930s?
Herbert Hoover was the 31st President of the United States, serving from 1929 to 1933. Hoover's philosophy on economics was influenced by the American individualist, capitalist, and humanitarian philosophies that were prevalent during his time in office.
In response to the economic downturn that began in the early 1930s, Hoover attempted to use government intervention and private-sector cooperation to mitigate the effects of the depression.The American individualist philosophy influenced Herbert Hoover's initial response to the economic downturn in the early 1930s. The philosophy held that every person is responsible for their own success or failure, and that government intervention in the economy should be minimal. Hoover believed that private-sector initiatives would be more successful in reviving the economy than government intervention. He relied on volunteerism and philanthropy to help those in need during the Great Depression. Hoover believed that charity would help to alleviate the economic hardship caused by the depression.Hoover's economic policies, however, were criticized for being inadequate to address the scale of the problem. Many Americans believed that the government should have done more to help the unemployed and homeless. Hoover's philosophy of individualism and limited government intervention was unable to address the magnitude of the Great Depression's impact on the American economy.In conclusion, the American individualist philosophy influenced Herbert Hoover's initial response to the economic downturn in the early 1930s. He believed that private-sector initiatives would be more successful in reviving the economy than government intervention. However, his economic policies were criticized for being inadequate to address the scale of the problem, and many Americans believed that the government should have done more to help those affected by the Great Depression.
for more such question on humanitarian
https://brainly.com/question/769309
#SPJ11
how did militarism contribute to the outbreak of World War 1?
a. it promoted the neutrality of certain nations.
b. it led to an arms race among nations
c. it led to vying alliance systems
d. it promoted ideas of self-degermation of different people
Answer:
the military establishment began to have a greater influence on public policy. hope it helps.
Explanation:
Question 3 of 10
What was one element of Ronald Reagan's New Right agenda?
A. The United States should practice an isolationist foreign policy.
B. The United States should help countries at risk of annexation by
communist countries.
C. The United States should pursue an aggressive foreign policy.
O
D. The United States should assist foreign allies in dire
circumstances only.
B. The United States should help countries at risk of annexation by communist countries.
Ronald Reagan's New Right agenda was a conservative movement that emphasized limited government, free-market capitalism, and social conservatism. As part of this agenda, Reagan sought to promote American values and interests abroad, particularly in the face of perceived Soviet aggression. One element of his foreign policy was the belief that the United States should help countries at risk of annexation by communist countries, such as providing military and economic aid to anti-communist rebels in Nicaragua and supporting anti-Soviet forces in Afghanistan. This approach, known as the Reagan Doctrine, was a departure from the containment strategy pursued by previous administrations and reflected Reagan's belief in the importance of standing up to Soviet expansionism.
Which of the following accurately describes the significance of the Hagia Sophia?
a. It ensured that Christianity would always be the primary religion in the region.
b. It showed that the Byzantines would resist Roman influence on their Greek art and architecture.
c. It demonstrates the fusion of Greek, Roman, and later Arabic cultures in the city.
d. Its destruction in the Nika Riots symbolizes the fragile peace of the Byzantine Empire.
The correct answer is c. The Hagia Sophia is an architectural marvel located in Istanbul, Turkey.
When was it originally constructed ?It was originally constructed as a Christian cathedral by Emperor Justinian I in 537 AD and remained a cathedral until the fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans in 1453. It then served as a mosque until 1935 when it was converted into a museum.
The Hagia Sophia is significant for many reasons, but one of the most important is that it represents the fusion of Greek, Roman, and later Arabic cultures in the city. Its architecture combines elements of Greek and Roman styles, while the interior features stunning mosaics and other artwork that reflect the cultural influences of the Byzantine Empire.
In addition, the Hagia Sophia was a symbol of the power and influence of the Byzantine Empire. Its construction was an enormous undertaking that required the labor of thousands of workers and the use of innovative building techniques. Its size and grandeur were intended to demonstrate the might of the Byzantine Empire to the world.
While the Hagia Sophia's destruction in the Nika Riots did symbolize the fragile peace of the Byzantine Empire, it is only one part of its significance. Ultimately, the Hagia Sophia represents the rich cultural history of Istanbul and the enduring legacy of the Byzantine Empire.
To know more about Byzantine Empire, visit :
https://brainly.com/question/18205624
#SPJ1
In a paragraph, identify and analyze the causes and effects of the space and
arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union. In your response,
provide at least ONE cause and effect on the space and arms race between the
two countries.
Answer:
The Space and Arms race was caused by the Cold War between the Soviet Union and the US. The US invented a nuclear weapon, which would have caused them to lead the war, but then the Soviet Union started to make nuclear weapons. Each time the Soviet Union made one weapon, the US made 2, and then the Soviet Union made 5.
The Space Race started when the Soviet Union sent Sputnik, which was the first artificial satellite. A few weeks later, the US sent the first American Rocket to space.
Why did the United States try to stay out of World War I at first?
Which two kings of Russia became the most influential during the Age of Absolutism? How did
their decisions affect the nation?
Peter the Great ruled as Russia's czar or ruler from 1682 until his passing in 1725. He tried to modernize Russia and build it into an empire that could compete with anything in Europe during his rule.
Which two Russian rulers rose to prominence during the Era of Absolutism?
Ivan III (reigned 1462-1505) built on Byzantine customs and set the groundwork for the tsarist dictatorship, which would rule Russia for centuries with some modifications. Throughout the 17th and 18th centuries, Russia's absolutism increasingly replaced the despotism of the Grand Duchy of Moscow. The most notable instance of absolutism has traditionally been regarded as the rule of Louis XIV of France (1643–1715).
The Russian Revolution occurred in 1917 as a result of a peasant and working-class uprising against Tsar Nicholas II's rule. Vladimir Lenin and a group of revolutionaries known as the Bolsheviks led them. They'd construct huge royal courts. There were members of the wider royal family there, as well as everyone who usually looked after the king and queen.
Learn more about Russia:
https://brainly.com/question/9695945
#SPJ1
Part II: Application and Critical Thinking (40 points)
6. Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and James Monroe were three early Democratic Republican
presidents. Write an essay at least three paragraphs long that explains and describes the significance
of their presidencies.
Your essay should:
• Describe Jefferson's, Madison's, and Monroe's major goals
• Identify and explain Jefferson's, Madison's, and Monroe's domestic and foreign policies
Describe the important achievements of the Jefferson, the Madison, and the Monroe presidencies
Botany and Ballots: Hamilton, leader of the Federalist Party, encouraged commerce and expansive authorities while Jefferson and Madison, leading the Anti-Administration faction, recommended agriculture and constrained government.
What had been James Madison and Thomas Jefferson involved in?Under Thomas Jefferson, Madison served as secretary of state, assisting the Louisiana Purchase and the embargo against Britain and France. Indeed, Madison shaped foreign coverage at some stage in Jefferson's administration, emerging from in the back of the scenes in 1808 to succeed him as the fourth President of the United States.
What did James Madison and Thomas Jefferson argue about?Rather than affirming the principles of free speech and civil protections for aliens not charged with crimes, Jefferson and Madison argued that the energy to omit such acts was once no longer exact delegated to the country wide government by means of the states.
Learn more about Jefferson, here:
brainly.com/question/18303708
#SPJ1
• Why do you think accusations made at the time by James Callender failed to hurt Jefferson politically?
One reason why the accusations made by James Callender failed to hurt Thomas Jefferson politically is that they were seen as politically motivated and lacked credibility. Callender was known for his anti-Federalist views and had a history of making false accusations. Additionally, many of the allegations he made, such as Jefferson's alleged relationship with Sally Hemings, were already known to the public and had not hurt Jefferson's political standing in the past. Moreover, Jefferson was a popular and respected political figure, and his supporters were willing to overlook any personal flaws or scandals. Overall, while the accusations made by Callender were scandalous, they ultimately did not have a significant impact on Jefferson's political career.
Which of the following was NOT a danger that merchants faced on the Silk Roads.
O Bandit attacks
O Natural disasters like avalanches
O Having their ship sunk by a storm
Wild animals
Answer:
Which of the following was NOT a danger that merchants faced on the Silk Roads.
O Bandit attacks
O Natural disasters like avalanches
O Having their ship sunk by a storm
Wild animals
Explanation:
Having their ship sunk by a storm was NOT a danger that merchants faced on the Silk Roads, as the Silk Roads primarily involved overland trade routes and not maritime trade.
Write at least one cost of the two party system that Washington states in his address
Washington believed that the cost of a two-party system was the emergence of a climate of bitter partisanship, the pursuit of power and influence by rival factions that would ultimately threaten the unity and prosperity of the country.
What was cost of two party system according to George Washington?In his farewell address, George Washington warned against the dangers of political factions and the emergence of a two-party system. He argued that such a system would inevitably lead to "cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men" seeking to advance their own interests at the expense of the public good, and would create a climate of bitter partisanship that would undermine the stability and effectiveness of government.
He believed that loyalty to political parties would become more important than loyalty to the nation, and that the pursuit of power and influence by rival factions would ultimately threaten the unity and prosperity of the country. He urged Americans to resist the temptation to form political parties and to cultivate a spirit of unity and patriotism that would allow them to work together for the common good.
Read more about two party system
brainly.com/question/26695072
#SPJ1
how did haji khalil define his universe of obligation
Haji Khalil defined his universe of obligation as the people for whom he felt responsible or accountable.
Who was Haji Khalil ?In the book, Haji Khalil's universe of obligation was defined by his identity as a Muslim and his role as a community leader. He felt responsible for the safety and well-being of his fellow Muslims in Goražde, regardless of their ethnicity or nationality.
This included not only the members of his own community, but also other Muslims in the area who were affected by the war. However, Haji Khalil's universe of obligation was not limited to Muslims alone.
Find out more on Haji Khalil at https://brainly.com/question/28857142
#SPJ1
Althusser, though a Marxist, maintains that the law and its agents have what he calls…........................
a.
relative consensus
b.
divisive interest
c.
independent force
d.
relative autonomy
Answer:
Explanation:
The correct answer is d. relative autonomy.
Althusser was a Marxist philosopher who believed that the law and its agents have a certain degree of autonomy from the economic base, or the mode of production, of a society. He argued that the legal system is not simply a reflection of the economic relations of a society, but that it has its own internal logic and structure that shapes its operation.
Althusser referred to this relative independence of the legal system as "relative autonomy." He believed that the legal system, while not completely separate from the economic base, is able to exercise some degree of independent power and influence within society. This means that legal agents, such as judges and lawyers, are not simply passive instruments of the ruling class, but have their own interests and priorities that shape their decisions and actions.
