In a group discussion, a participant says, “I hate walking. Why walk when you can just get a ride?” Write three to four sentences in which you share your own viewpoint. Be sure to provide evidence and refer to the passage you just read.

Answer:

a makeup artist is the answer

Answer:

supporter:

benefactor meaning;

a person who gives money or other help to a person or cause.

"a low-interest loan from a benefactor

Explanation:

I'm sure im right ☺️

Answer:

I doubt it but why not try it

Explanation:

Answer:

i think its a myth but go for it if u want to

Answer:   THERE IS NOTHING GREATER THAN MUSIC

WHAT WOULD THE WORLD BE WITHOUT MUSIC

The world would be a very quiet place. Music is in many ways the fabric of our lives and the definition of society. It is a reminder of how things once were, an indication of how things are, and a view of where society is headed. Music is a direct reflection of the picture of society. Music can be a way to deliver messages, a poetic medium, a fine art, or nothing more than a source of entertainment. No matter what it is used for, music is the perfect art and our lives would be that much less complete without it that life as we know it would not at all be the same without music. Music is the perfect art. It has movement, because it progresses over a set period of time.  However, music does not restrict the audience in the way that movies or graphic art does. The listener can create whatever image she or he wants to when listening to music. It is an art that appeals to the conscious mind, but the best music also appeals to the subconscious. No thought is required to enjoy good music, though it is often thought-inspiring. Instrumental music does not bind the listener into a fixed template in the way that literature and poetry do: the reaction to music is different from person to person Music with lyrics is often referred to as “words set to music.” This is not always the case.  However, they restrict the images of the musical work in the same way that prose and poetry limit their subject. Whether instrumental or lyrical, music comes from the people and can enlighten us all. It was during the 1960s that the social revolution and the struggles for civil rights inspired such musicians as Bob Dylan, Janis Joplin and Joan Baez to write songs of protest. In turn, the music of these artists, and many others, influenced the younger generations and spread the word of the revolution. Without music, many teenagers of the time would not have been given the influence of the time or its associated mentality. Music was, and continues to be, a kind of social education to the younger generation. Teenagers turn to popular music for their philosophies and get a sense of their place in the world. In fact, cliques of young people are often defined by the music they listen to: “punks” listen to punk rock and heavy metal; “nerds” are reputed to listen to classical music; the “in” crowd listens to the latest material alternative music has to offer; the “loners” listen to obscure pop artists or classic rock. Youth culture would be much less vivid than it is if the world had no music. Generations would not be sparked to action without music. The war drums of primitive peoples were a kind of music. It was they that stirred the Cavemen and the Vikings to participate in decade-long wars. Music's social influence is ever-present. Our society is shaped by it. Not only is music the chisel of society; it is a constant thread that runs through nature. Music is everywhere: the sound of falling water, the rustle of leaves underfoot, the call of wild birds even the sound of rush-hour traffic is a kind of music. The common definition of music is “a series of pitches and rhythms that have an overall coherence.” This definition is limited to man-made music. For humans to create music is inevitable. It is as natural as thought.  Therefore, the idea of a world without music is highly hypothetical. One would sooner consider a life without experiences or a year without days. A day in a world without music might proceed like this: One would awaken to the sound of a radio announcer speaking about politics. On the way to work, the radio show would consist of interviews with famous personalities. The work day would be terribly boring, since the office would not have any decorations (these would have been made by artists who had been influenced by music).  This “world without music” seems to have incoherence's and cracks in it. It does not make sense and does not quite explain itself. Music is essential for the world to even make sense. It is as fundamentally inherent as gravity is in the universe. Any attempt to restrict or control music, such as is made in communist politics, is both vain and unrealistic. One cannot challenge the broadloom of the universe when making political policies!  The history of human musicians is rich, and has many fine people lining its ranks. Music has changed the artistic and non-artistic world immeasurably, such that a world without music is nothing more than a terrifying fantasy.  A world without music would be a quiet place indeed.

Explanation:

Explanation:

hope it helps

plss mark me as a brainliest thanks

The specific outcome Kobe aimed to get out of physical therapy sessions is:

Why are the above outcomes specifically important?

For further information on Physical therapy:

https://brainly.com/question/14563609

#SPJ2

The given sentence "Imagine if dinosaurs still existed, roaming the streets alongside humans." is grammatically correct and free of errors.

The correct answer to the given question is option C.

It does not have any Comma splice or Fused sentence.The comma between "existed" and "roaming" is correctly used to separate two independent clauses.

"Imagine if dinosaurs still existed" and "roaming the streets alongside humans" are both complete thoughts that can stand alone as sentences. But they are joined with a comma to show their close relationship.

In conclusion, this sentence is correctly written, and there is no error in it. It does not have any Comma splice or Fused sentence.

For more such questions on grammatically correct, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/27406454

#SPJ8

Answer:

larger than molecules

Explanation:

Cells are larger than molecules as cells are made of molecules

Even though they are both too small to see, cells are much larger than the molecules. Molecules combine to form polymers which are present in the cell organelles.

Cells can be defined as the basic building blocks of all living things on this planet. The human body is found to be composed of trillions of cells. However, a single cell can be considered as an independent organism such as single-celled bacteria. They provide the structure for body, take in nutrients from the food that we eat, convert those nutrients from the food into energy, and carry out specialized functions in the body.

A molecule is different from the cell as it is a group of two or more similar or different atoms which are held together by attractive forces known as chemical bonds. And, the molecules may or may not include ions in it which satisfy this criterion.

Molecules are made up of atoms. The atoms are linked together to form a molecule through the help of chemical bonds. A cell is the smallest unit of life. A cell is made up of many organic and inorganic compounds and molecules which are formed by many atoms.

Learn more about Cell here:

https://brainly.com/question/3142913

#SPJ2

Answer:

You haven't given any of the options. That's like me asking you how many shoes there are with your eyes closed, so Ill just give an example.

Example:

Expository writing is writing that seeks to explain, illuminate or "expose" (which is where the word "expository" comes from). This type of writing can include essays, newspaper and magazine articles, instruction manuals, textbooks, encyclopedia articles and other forms of writing, so long as they seek to explain.

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

You can put fun facts into a paragraph, it makes the paragraph more interesting.

Answer:

its already out

Explanationaction (ofc)

its really fantasy based

Answer: For the second question it is...

Explanation: The narrator felt as though he was nervous as it says in the passage "I knew it was safe to return to the canals, but I

somehow couldn’t bring myself to go back. Any time I thought about it, I felt the cold sweat on

my skin. To this day Neruda’s poems, even the ones about desperate heartache, make me

think of feral cats."

This states that he knew it was safe but he couldn't go back because of what he had gone through.

Answer:

It can show peoples emotions and it can bring people together by having the same interests.

Answer:

A

Explanation:

An independent clause is a part of a sentence separated by a comma that can function as a full sentence on its own.