Ellerton argues that when considering how contentious claims could be supported, we should not involve plagiarism in the process.
In the article examining how do you know what you know is true, Ellerton makes the argument that when evaluating contentious claims, we should consider how they could be supported if presented to an impartial or disinterested person. However, Ellerton's argument does not involve plagiarism. Here's a step-by-step explanation:
Ellerton emphasizes the importance of considering how contentious claims can be supported when presenting them to an impartial or disinterested person.This suggests that we should strive for objectivity and fairness in our evaluation of claims.Ellerton likely discusses the need for presenting evidence, logical reasoning, and reliable sources to support contentious claims.However, plagiarism, which involves using someone else's work or ideas without proper attribution, is not mentioned as a part of Ellerton's argument.Plagiarism goes against the principles of honesty and intellectual integrity, and it is generally considered unethical and academically unacceptable.Instead, Ellerton's focus is on presenting arguments in a manner that is fair, unbiased, and supported by valid evidence.Therefore, plagiarism is not part of the argument put forth by Ellerton in the article.For more such question on contentious claims
https://brainly.com/question/13178581
#SPJ8