While law is a practical discipline, due to the many applications that it has in the real world, law can also be considered a theoretical discipline. Both aspects of it are necessary in order to develop a functioning code of law. Theory is necessary in law, as it guides the development of new laws that agree with the principles established in past laws. Knowing the theory behind laws can also help us understand the reasoning or "spirit" behind the law, helping us interpret it more accurately.
An example of the importance of theoretical law is the case of contract law. Contract law refers to the legality that surrounds the development of a contract between people. A contract is a legally binding agreement, usually involving goods, services, money or property. Contracts can be written down, or exist in an oral form. Theory is important when dealing with contract law because by understanding the theory of law, we are able to create contracts that are fairer, more effective and more standardized.
Suppose that during construction, Lafayette asked Carl Davidson to rent space in a warehouse that was close to the bridge so that she could work on her sculptures near the site where they would eventually be installed. Carl Davidson signed the rental contract in his own name rather than the name of the LLC. The other members of Davidson Masonry were not aware of the rental agreement. In this situation, would a court likely hold that Davidson Masonry was liable on the contract that Carl Davidson had entered
Answer: Yes, a court would likely hold that Davidson Masonry was also liable on the contract that had been entered by Carl Davidson.
Explanation:
Yes, I believe that Davidson Masonry would also be bound by the contact that has been entered into by Lafayette. Carl Davidson did so for the purpose and goal of the project that they were all working on in their joint venture.
Even though Carl Davidson entered into this separate agreement without the knowledge of Davidson Masonry’s, Carl still did so while in the joint venture with them and also for the purposes of the joint venture project. Therefore, Davidson Masonry would likely be bounded by a court to this contract.
Which international conflict resulted from tensions between the US and Soviet Union A)Cuban missile crisis B)the Vietnam war C) the Korean War D) The bay of pigs invasion
Answer:
The bay of pigs invasion
Explanation:
The Bay of Pigs Invasion in April 1961 was a failed attack launched by the CIA during ... Bay of Pigs: President Kennedy and the Cold War ... with the Soviet Union, and the United States responded by prohibiting the ... In 1962, the Cuban missile crisis inflamed American-Cuban-Soviet tensions even further.
law is a practical discipline, theory has no place in law. With specific reference to the law of contract discuss.
Answer:
The reference about the law used is its clarity, efficiency and specificity.
Explanation:
When people claim that "law is a practical discipline, theory has no place in law," they mean that the law allows us to get specific answers from right and wrong, and not assumptions and concepts about what is right and wrong within. of a society, that is, if the law does not tolerate assumptions, the theory has no place within the law.
This can be seen, because a theory is an assumption about how something happens and an assumption of the events that cause it to happen.
The law is something clear, direct, dynamic and practical, which shows a certainty and not an assumption.
Law is a practical discipline, theory has no place in law. In two pages, Discuss with specific references to the law of contract.
Answer:
Check Explanation since we have to discus it.
''LAW OF CONTRACTS are made BASED ON REAL LIFE CASES''.
Explanation:
LAW IS A PRACTICAL DISCIPLINE, THEORY HAS NO PLACE IN LAW.
Law is truly a practical discipline because at one time in our various lives we all have actually observe the law. Here, our reference is going to be on the LAW OF CONTRACT.
CONTRACT is a form of aggreement between two or more people. Contract may be written or maybe spoken. Contracts are enforceable under the law if there is a physical evidence that shows that their is surely an agreement.
We all at some point in our lives make agreements and sign a contract(written) or even just with mouth for instance your oath to be law abiding to school rules and regulations and many more.
When contract are breached, the LAW OF CONTRACT is being used in determining the guilty and the innocent. These laws are that is LAW OF CONTRACTS are made BASED ON REAL LIFE CASES which makes law LAW to be A PRACTICAL DISCIPLINE.
Almost everyday in our various lives, we all practice law, hence LAW IS A PRACTICAL DISCIPLINE, THEORY HAS NO PLACE IN LAW.
What was The first state to pass insurance legislation
Answer:
Massachusetts
Explanation:
The political viewpoint that favors social tradition and restraint from regulating business is called
Answer:
I believe it is conservativism. the people are called conservatives
One day you conduct a family session: the boy, the mother, and the father are all present. After the session, you realize that your client’s father was your parents’ lawyer. Discuss your possible actions and remember Standard 1.3 from the AAMFT Code of Ethics and the first standard in the CAMFT Code of Ethics.
Answer: The answer is provided below
Explanation:
The ethical details which is relevant to the present case, based on standard 1.3, relating to the power differential between the client and therapist and avoiding close personal relationships or business with a client or client’s immediate family, as this could impair the professional judgment or lead to an increase in the risk of exploitation.
It would be tough to substantiate that the father’s role in the provision of legal representation to my parents results in an unequivocal impediment on my professional judgment, since the personal connection belongs to an unclear past. In this ethical interpretation, I am tempted to choose a lenient approach and will continue to include the father in future therapy sessions. Based on the requirements of standard 1.3, I will document the existence of a potential multiple role and take appropriate precautions in limiting interactions with the father strictly to only therapeutic collaborations, and do away from any personal discussions or maybe transactions.
The main reason for this ethical decision is based on the standards of beneficence i.e pursuing the greatest good for the greatest number. Additionally, I will also consider it beneficial to continue involving an abusive parent in the therapeutic efforts, as a way of effecting change and monitoring the systemic power imbalance.
