logx-log(x-l)^2=2log(x-1)​

Answer:

[tex]S = 3 h[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Let M represent Michaela hair tier and S represents Michaela  sister's

Given

M = h

S = Triple of M

Required

Determine an expression for S

From the given parameters, we have that;

S = Triple of M

Mathematically, this implies;

[tex]S = 3 * M[/tex]

Substitute h for M

[tex]S = 3 * h[/tex]

[tex]S = 3 h[/tex]

Hence, the expression for Michaela  sister' is [tex]S = 3 h[/tex]

Answer:

see below

Step-by-step explanation:

Difference is subtract

(8-2)

Then add this to x

(8-2) +x

6+x

Answer:

(x,y) -> (x+6, y-3)

Step-by-step explanation:

I followed c and it translated like the  last ans choice.

Answer:

ii. 75 steps

iii. 75 steps

iv. 106 steps, and [tex]315^{0}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Let Musah's starting point be A, his waiting point after taking 50 steps northward and 25 steps westward be B, and his stopping point be C.

ii. From the second attachment, Musah's distance due west from A to C (AD) can be determined as;

bearing at B = [tex]315^{0}[/tex], therefore <BCD = [tex]45^{0}[/tex]

To determine distance AB,

[tex]/AB/^{2}[/tex] = [tex]/50/^{2}[/tex]   +  [tex]/25/^{2}[/tex]

          = 25000 + 625

          = 3125

AB = [tex]\sqrt{3125}[/tex]

     = 55.90

AB ≅ 56 steps

Thus, AC = 50 steps + 56 steps

               = 106 steps

From ΔACD,

Sin [tex]45^{0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{x}{106}[/tex]

⇒ x = 106 × Sin [tex]45^{0}[/tex]

      = 74.9533

     ≅ 75 steps

Musah's distance west from centre to final point is 75 steps

iii. From the secon attachment, Musah's distance north, y, can be determined by;

Cos [tex]45^{0}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{y}{106}[/tex]

⇒ y = 106 × Cos [tex]45^{0}[/tex]

      = 74.9533

      ≅ 75 steps

Musah's distance north from centre to final point is 75 steps.

iv. Musah's distance from centre to final point is AC = AB + BC

                                     = 50 steps + 56 steps

                                     = 106 steps

From ΔACD,

Tan θ = [tex]\frac{75}{75}[/tex]

          = 1.0

θ = [tex]Tan^{-1}[/tex]  1.0

 = [tex]45^{0}[/tex]

Musah's bearing from centre to final point = [tex]45^{0}[/tex] + [tex]270^{0}[/tex]

                                                           =  [tex]315^{0}[/tex]

Answer:

300

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to find 12/37 of 444.

12/37 * 444 = 12/37 * 444/1 = (12 * 444)/(37 * 1) = 5328/37 = 144

She sat in the back seat 144 times out of 444.

444 - 144 = 300

She sat in the front seat 300 times.

Answer:

The distribution is positively skewed.

Step-by-step explanation:

A measure of skewness is defined in such a way that the measure should always be zero when the distribution is symmetric and measure should be a pure number i.e independent of origin and units of measurement.

The shape of the distribution can be found by finding the coefficient of skewness.

The coefficient of skewness can be found by  

Sk= 3(Mean-Median)/ Standard Deviation

Sk= 3( 50-40)5= 30/5=6

The shape will be positively skewed.

In a positively skewed distribution the mean > median > mode. It has a long right tail.

Using the skewness formula, it is found that the distribution is right-skewed.

------------------

[tex]S = \frac{3(M - M_e)}{s}[/tex]

------------------

The coefficient is:

[tex]S = \frac{3(M - M_e)}{s} = \frac{3(50 - 40)}{5} = \frac{30}{5} = 6[/tex]

Thus, the distribution is right-skewed.

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/24415645

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{(3,-1)}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey there!

Well to find the solution the the given system,

3y - 2x = -9

y = -2x + 5

So to find x lets plug in -2x + 5 for y in 3y - 2x = -9.

3(-2x + 5) - 2x = -9

Distribute

-6x + 15 - 2x = -9

-8x + 15 = -9

-15 to both sides

-8x = -24

Divide -8 to both sides

x = 3

Now that we have x which is 3, we can plug in 3 for x in y = -2x + 5.

y = -2(3) + 5

y = -6 + 5

y = -1

So the solution is (3,-1).

Hope this helps :)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

For b

To find side b we use the sine rule

a = 7

A = 23°

B = 32°

b = ?

Substitute the values into the above formula

That's

Divide both sides by sin 23°

b = 9.493573

To find side c we use sine rule

C = 125°

So we have

Divide both sides by sin 23°

c = 14.67521

Hope this helps you

Answer:

0.000014

Step-by-step explanation:

The chart is not provided so i will use an example chart to explain the answer. Here is a sample chart:

City X's Population by Age

0-24 years old 33%

25-44 years old 22%

45-64 years old 21%

65 or older 24%

In order to find probability of independent events we find the probability of each event occurring separately and then multiply the calculated probabilities together in the following way:

P(A and B) = P(A) * P(B)

probability that the first 2 are 65 or older

Let A be the event that the first 2 are 65 or older

The probability of 65 or older 24% i.e. 0.24

So the probability that first 2 are 65 or older is:

0.24(select resident 1) * 0.24(select resident 2)

P(A) = 0.24 * 0.24

       = 0.0576

P(A) = 0.0576

probability that the next 3 are 25-44 years old

Let B be the event that the next 3 are 25-44 years old

25-44 years old 22%  i.e. 0.22

So the probability that the next 3 are 25-44 years old is:

0.22 * 0.22* 0.22

P(B) = 0.22 * 0.22 * 0.22

      = 0.010648

P(B) = 0.010648

probability that next 2 are 24 or younger

Let C be the event that the next 2 are 24 or younger

0-24 years old 33% i.e. 0.33

So the probability that the next 2 are 24 or younger is:

0.33 * 0.33

P(C) = 0.33 * 0.33

       = 0.1089

P(C) = 0.1089

probability that last is 45-64 years old

Let D be the event that last is 45-64 years old

45-64 years old 21%  i.e. 0.21

So the probability that last is 45-64 years old is:

0.21

P(D) = 0.21

So probability of these independent events is computed as:

P(A and B and C and D) = P(A) * P(B) * P(C) * P(C)

                                        = 0.0576 * 0.010648  * 0.1089  * 0.21

                                        = 0.000014

(a)

[tex]\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x}=x^2\implies f(x,y)=\dfrac{x^3}3+g(y)[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial y}=\dfrac{\mathrm dg}{\mathrm dy}=y^2\implies g(y)=\dfrac{y^3}3+C[/tex]

[tex]\implies f(x,y)=\dfrac{x^3+y^3}3+C[/tex]

(b)

[tex]\displaystyle\int_C\nabla f\cdot\mathrm d\mathbf r=f(2,8)-f(-1,2)=\boxed{171}[/tex]

Answer:

The dimensions or Area of the rectangle is 1200cm².

Answer:

  subtracting 56 instead of adding (or adding wrong)

Step-by-step explanation:

She wrote ...

  x - 56 = 230

  x - 56 - 56 = 230 -56 . . . . correct application of the addition property*

  x = 230 -56 . . . . . . . . . . . . incorrect simplification

Correctly done, the third line would be ...

  x -112 = 174

This would have made Sherina realize that the error was in subtracting 56 instead of adding it. The correct solution would be ...

  x - 56 + 56 = 230 + 56 . . . using the addition property of equality

  x = 286 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . correct simplification on both sides

__

There were two errors:

  1) incorrect strategy --- subtracting 56 instead of adding

  2) incorrect simplification --- simplifying -56 -56 to zero instead of -112

We don't know whether you want to count the error in thinking as the first error, or the error in execution where the mechanics of addition were incorrectly done.

_____

* The addition property of equality requires the same number be added to both sides of the equation. Sherina did that correctly. However, the number chosen to be added was the opposite of the number that would usefully work toward a solution.

Answer:

D: Sherina should have added 56 to both sides of the equation.

Step-by-step explanation:

I got a 100% on my test.

I hope this helps.

Step-by-step explanation:

The inequality shows by line is

i) 1<=x<=6

OR,

x is an positive integer.

Answer:

She must consider 3507 components to be 90% sure of knowing the mean will be within ± 0.1 mm.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that an engineer wishes to determine the width of a particular electronic component. If she knows that the standard deviation is 3.6 mm.

And she considers to be 90% sure of knowing the mean will be within ±0.1 mm.

As we know that the margin of error is given by the following formula;

The margin of error =  [tex]Z_(_\frac{\alpha}{2}_) \times \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]  

Here, [tex]\sigma[/tex] = standard deviation = 3.6 mm

         n = sample size of components

         [tex]\alpha[/tex] = level of significance = 1 - 0.90 = 0.10 or 10%

         [tex]\frac{\alpha}{2} = \frac{0.10}{2}[/tex] = 0.05 or 5%

Now, the critical value of z at a 5% level of significance in the z table is given to us as 1.645.

So, the margin of error =  [tex]Z_(_\frac{\alpha}{2}_) \times \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]  

                  0.1 mm        =  [tex]1.645 \times \frac{3.6}{\sqrt{n} }[/tex]

                    [tex]\sqrt{n} = \frac{3.6\times 1.645}{0.1 }[/tex]

                    [tex]\sqrt{n}[/tex] = 59.22

                     n = [tex]59.22^{2}[/tex] = 3507.0084 ≈ 3507.

Hence, she must consider 3507 components to be 90% sure of knowing the mean will be within ± 0.1 mm.

Answer:

Answer to question a = 95.4

Answer to question b = UCL = 96.07

LCL = 94.73

Answer to question c = Process is still in control

Step-by-step explanation:

a. The computation of estimate mean is as shown below:-

= 95.4

b. The computation of Upper Control Limit (UCL) and the Lower Control Limit (LCL) for the manufacturing process is shown below:-

= 95.4 + 0.67082

= 96.07

= 95.4 - 0.67082

= 94.73

c. The explanation is shown below:-

From the above calculation we can see that the sample lies between LCL AND UCL that is (94.73 ,96.07) ,

The Process is still in control

Answer:

Cohen's d : 1.00

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that M₁ = 18, and M₂ = 14. Given that the pooled variance for the these two samples are 16, S²Pooled = 16, and therefore S - pooled = 4.

The formula to solve for the value of Cohen's d is as follows,

d = M₁ - M₂ / S - pooled,

d = 18 - 14 / 4 = 4 / 4 = 1

Therefore the value of Cohen's d = 1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

● h(x) = 2-2x

The domain is {-3,-2,1,5}

● h(-3) = 2-2×(-3) = 2+6 = 8

● h(-2) = 2 -2×(-2) = 2+4 = 6

● h(1) = 2-2×1 = 2-2 = 0

● h(5) = 2-2×5 = 2-10 = -8

The range is {-8,0,6,8}

Answer:

Calculated χ² = 13.425

χ² (5,0.025) >14.45 and χ²(5,0.975) <1.24

The given data does not fall in the critical region so we accept H0 and conclude there is no evidence to doubt the color distribution claimed by the website.

Step-by-step explanation:

Color             Blue      Orange     Green    Red   Yellow    Brown

Frequency     30         48              55        66         70         131

Expected      40           40              40        80          80        120

H0:  The bag of plain M&Ms is made up of 10% blue, 10% orange, 10% green, 20% red, 20% yellow, and 30% brown

Ha: The color distribution is not equal to  the distribution stated in the null hypothesis.

Calculate chi square

χ² = (30-40)² /40 + (48-40)²/40 + (55-40)²/40 + (66-80)²/80 + (70-80)²/80 + (131-120)²/120

χ² = 2.5 + 1.6 + 5.625 + 2.45 + 1.25= 13.425

The critical region for χ²  for 5 degrees of freedom with ∝= 0.05 is

χ² (5,0.025) >14.45 and χ²(5,0.975) <1.24

The given data does not fall in the critical region so we accept H0 and conclude there is no evidence to doubt the color distribution claimed by the website.

Step-by-step explanation:

When you have a ratio, you put one number as the numerator and than one number as the denominator.

so it would be (12/34)=(x/68)

In this example I made the ratio you are comparing it to have 68 dollars, so when you solve for the amount of quarters you need it should be 24, since all of the numbers in this example are just being doubled.

To solve for x, you multiply 68 on both sides of the equation, 68×(12/34)=x

24=x

So this proves that this is how ratios, are used. It also does not matter what number you place on the numerator or denominator.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

First we start with 12 pounds

On Monday, she and her friends eat 4 pounds. So we have 8 now.

On Tuesday, she and her friends eat another 3 pounds. So we gave 5 now.

On Wednesday, her friend Mark gives her some more cheesecake so that she has 3 times as much as she had at the end of Tuesday. 5 * 3 = 15

On Thursday, some of her cheesecake goes bad, so she has the amount that she had at the end of Wednesday, but divided by 5. She had 15 at the end of Wednesday. 15/5 = 3.

On Friday, she gives 3 pounds to her dog. 5 - 3 = 2.

On Saturday, her mom gives her one more pound. 2 + 1 = 3.

On Sunday, she finally has 3 pounds.

Answer:

nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-50

Step-by-step explanation:

Basically get two slopes -50(1)+100 will get you 1,50 (1 is x and 50 is y since its the answer)

-50(0)+100 (0,100)  Y₂-Y₁/X₂-X₁ 50-100/1-0

Rate of change per month = -$50

Answer:

27.73 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the Pythagorean theorem. It easiest to think of the distance between the two friends as a triangle in the rectangle. One side is 12ft and the other is 25ft.

12^2+25ft^2=769

The square root of 769 is 27.73

Answer:

27.73 Ft

Step-by-step explanation:I took the test

Answer:

Explained below.

Step-by-step explanation:

Enter the data in an Excel sheet.

(a)

Go to Insert → Chart → Scatter.

Select the first type of Scatter chart.

The scatter plot is attached below.

(b)

The scatter plot with the line of best fit is attached below.

The line of best fit is:

[tex]y=-0.8046x+103.56[/tex]

(c)

Compute the value of x for y = 30 as follows:

[tex]y=-0.8046x+103.56[/tex]

[tex]30=-0.8046x+103.56\\\\0.8046x=103.56-30\\\\x=\frac{73.56}{0.8046}\\\\x\approx 91.42[/tex]

Thus, the Advance Mathematics mark of a student who scores 30 out of 100 in English is 91.42.

(d)

The Pearson's Correlation Coefficient is:

[tex]r=\frac{n\cdot \sum XY-\sum X\cdot \sum Y}{\sqrt{[n\cdot \sum X^{2}-(\sum X)^{2}][n\cdot \sum Y^{2}-(\sum Y)^{2}]}}[/tex]

  [tex]=\frac{14\cdot 44010-835\cdot 778}{\sqrt{[14\cdot52775-(825)^{2}][14\cdot 47094-(778)^{2}]}}\\\\= -0.7062\\\\\approx -0.71[/tex]

Thus, the Pearson's Correlation Coefficient is -0.71.

(e)

A correlation coefficient between ± 0.50 and ±1.00 is considered as a strong correlation.

The correlation between Advanced Mathematics and English results is -0.71.

This implies that there is a strong negative correlation.

Answer:

42.7 mm

Step-by-step explanation:

To the nearest tenth of a mm, 42.67 mm would be 42.7 mm.

After estimate of this value rounded to the nearest tenth of a millimeter,

⇒ 42.67 ≈ 42.7

We have to given that,

According to the United States Golf Association, the diameter of a golf ball should not be less than 42.67 millimeters.

Hence, After estimate of this value rounded to the nearest tenth of a millimeter, we get;

⇒ 42.67

As, 7 is grater than 5, so we can add 1 to the tenth place.

⇒ 42.67 ≈ 42.7

Therefore, After estimate of this value rounded to the nearest tenth of a millimeter,

⇒ 42.67 ≈ 42.7

Learn more about the rounding number visit:

brainly.com/question/27207159

#SPJ2

Answer: A) (-2, 4), (6,8)

Step-by-step explanation:

When a point (x,y) is dilated by a scale factor of k , then the new points is given by (kx,ky).

Given: The line segment AB with endpoints A(-3, 6) and B(9, 12) is dilated with a scale factor [tex]\dfrac23[/tex] about the origin.

Let A' and B' b the endpoints of the dilated line segment.

Then, [tex]A'(\dfrac{2}{3}(-3), \dfrac23(6))=A'(-2,4)[/tex]

[tex]B'(\dfrac{2}{3}(9), \dfrac23(12))=B'(6,8)[/tex]

Hence, the correct option is A) (-2, 4), (6,8)

Answer:

300 SF

Step-by-step explanation:

just took the test

Answer:

252

Step-by-step explanation:

Divide 7812 by 31 and we get the average daily answer... Hope this helps!!

Answer:

1,377/2 and 688 1/17

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A, E

Step-by-step explanation:

There should be 2^8-1 proper subsets of A. Its every one besides { }

Answer:

96

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given information:

At 95% Confidence interval level,Level of significance [tex]\alpha[/tex] 0.05, the value of Z from the standard normal tables = 1.96

Margin of Error = 0.10

Let assume that the estimated proportion = 0.5

therefore; the sample size n can be determined by using the formula: [tex]n =(\dfrac{Z}{E})^2 \times p\times (1-p)[/tex]

[tex]n =(\dfrac{1.96}{0.1})^2 \times 0.5\times (1-0.5)[/tex]

[tex]n =(19.6)^2 \times 0.5\times (0.5)[/tex]

n = 96.04

n [tex]\approx[/tex] 96