In the strategic decision-making process for introducing a new product like a wind turbine, Joe Mthembu, the Operations Manager of Solar Power, should consider asking the following questions:
Market Analysis: What is the market demand for wind turbines? Is there a potential customer base for this product? What are the current market trends and competitors in the wind turbine industry?
Feasibility Study: Is the company capable of developing and manufacturing wind turbines? What are the required resources, technology, and expertise needed? Are there any legal or regulatory barriers to consider?
Cost and Investment: What will be the initial investment required for developing and launching the wind turbine product? What are the expected production costs, including raw materials, manufacturing, and distribution? How will the pricing strategy be determined to ensure profitability?
Risk Assessment: What are the potential risks and challenges associated with entering the wind turbine market? Are there any technical or operational risks that need to be mitigated? What are the potential financial and reputational risks?
Value Proposition: What unique features or advantages does the wind turbine offer compared to existing products in the market? How will the product meet the needs and expectations of customers? What will be the value proposition and positioning strategy for the wind turbine?
Know more about Operations Manager here:
https://brainly.com/question/30415374
#SPJ11
Nash Manufacturing operates a small factory building. Recently, the company paid some amounts related to its property, plant, and equipment.
Nash paid $49,200 to replace part of the factory floor. The floor had been capitalized as part of the factory building when it was purchased ten years previously and was not considered a separate component. When purchased, the building had been assumed to have a 30-year useful life and was being depreciated on a straight-line basis. At the time of the floor replacement, the building had been depreciated for 10 years. Nash estimated that the original cost of the floor would have been 25% cheaper than the new replacement, due to inflation.
Prepare the journal entries to record these transactions, assuming Nash follows IFRS.
Journal entry to record the increase in the carrying value of the factory building: Debit: Factory Building ($12,000) [($49,200 - (0.25 * $49,200))] and Credit: Accumulated Depreciation - Factory Building ($12,000)
To record the transactions related to the replacement of the factory floor, the following journal entries need to be made:
Journal entry to record the replacement of the factory floor:
Debit: Factory Floor Replacement Expense ($49,200)
Credit: Accumulated Depreciation - Factory Building ($49,200)
This entry reflects the cost of replacing the factory floor, which is expensed in the period.
Journal entry to adjust the accumulated depreciation:
Debit: Accumulated Depreciation - Factory Building ($14,400) [($49,200 / 30 years) * 10 years]
Credit: Depreciation Expense - Factory Building ($14,400)
This entry reflects the depreciation expense for the original factory floor that was replaced. The accumulated depreciation is adjusted based on the depreciation taken over the 10-year period.
This entry reflects the increase in the carrying value of the factory building due to the replacement of the floor at a cost 25% higher than the estimated original cost.
Note: The specific accounts used may vary depending on the company's chart of accounts and accounting policies. Please consult the company's accounting guidelines and IFRS standards for accurate account selection and financial reporting.
To know more about journal entries refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/20421012
#SPJ11
Your team is composed of the Owner of a motor-racing circuit called the Bugatti Circuit in Le Mans in France, the Director, the Finance Director and the Marketing Director.
Roland Gumpert wishes to rent your racing circuit for one day to showcase his new creation, 2021 Roland Gumpert Nathalie. You, The Bugatti Circuit, have been approached by the car manufacturer and have discussed with them on the phone and by emails over the last few months. The person you spoke with was not clear enough in explaining their project, and you hope that this meeting will clarify their needs. They are traveling to France to negotiate with you in few weeks. Your usual daily rate is 100,000 EUR for the exclusivity. They have mentioned that they would like the exclusive use on October 9, next year, which is not a good date for you as Porsche has already rented the racing circuit for 4 days. Your aim is to try to convince them to instead accept a date in September. Also, the rule is to rent the racing circuit for a minimum of three days. However, the car manufacturer’s mentioned a limited budget and you will have to decide if you may grant an exception.
By approaching the negotiation with professionalism, flexibility, and a focus on finding a mutually beneficial solution, you increase the chances of reaching an agreement that satisfies Roland Gumpert and his team while aligning with the availability and requirements of the Bugatti Circuit.
As the Owner of the Bugatti Circuit, it is essential to approach the negotiation with Roland Gumpert and his team in a professional and solution-oriented manner. Here's a suggested approach to address their needs and find a mutually beneficial agreement:
1. Understand their Project: Begin the meeting by expressing your excitement about their interest in showcasing the 2021 Roland Gumpert Nathalie at the Bugatti Circuit. Politely explain that while you have had discussions over the phone and email, you would appreciate a more detailed explanation of their project, including their specific requirements and goals for the event. This will help you understand their needs better and tailor your offer accordingly.
2. Clarify Availability: Inform them that you have received their request for exclusive use on October 9, but due to a prior commitment with Porsche for four days, that specific date is not available. Apologize for any inconvenience caused and emphasize your desire to find an alternative solution.
3. Suggest Alternate Dates: Propose alternative dates in September that are available for a three-day minimum rental period. Highlight the advantages of September, such as better weather conditions or fewer scheduling conflicts. Emphasize that this alternative will still allow them to have the exclusive use of the circuit and maximize the impact of their event.
4. Consider Budget Constraints: When they mention their limited budget, express understanding and empathy. Mention that your usual daily rate is 100,000 EUR for exclusivity, but given their unique circumstances, you are open to discussing a tailored package that aligns with their budget. This flexibility shows goodwill and a willingness to accommodate their needs.
5. Present Value-Added Options: To further accommodate their budget, consider offering additional value-added options. This could include marketing support from the Bugatti Circuit's marketing team, discounted rates for certain services or facilities, or collaborative promotional activities.
Learn more about Bugatti Circuit here:
https://brainly.com/question/32815878
#SPJ11
JJ Ltd acquired a new plant at a cost of R2 350 000 on 1 January 2020. The plant had an estimated residual value of R67 000. The Directors of the company were convinced that the plant’s expected production life were 4 500 000 units. The plant produced 830 units and 780 units during the first and second year of use ended the 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2021 respectively.
Calculate the carrying amount of the plant at the end of 31 December 2021:
Select one:
a. R2 409 193
b. R2 836 193
c. R1 533 193
d. R1 455 193
The carrying amount of the plant at the end of 31 December 2021 is option c. R1 533 193.
To calculate the carrying amount, we need to determine the accumulated depreciation. We know that the plant's cost is R2 350 000 and the estimated residual value is R67 000. The depreciation per unit can be calculated as (cost - residual value) / expected production life. In this case, it is (R2 350 000 - R67 000) / 4 500 000 = R0.517 per unit.
For the first year, the depreciation expense is 830 units x R0.517 = R428.41. The carrying amount at the end of the first year is R2 350 000 - R428.41 = R1 921 571.59.
For the second year, the depreciation expense is 780 units x R0.517 = R403.86. The carrying amount at the end of the second year is R1 921 571.59 - R403.86 = R1 517 084.73.
Therefore, the carrying amount of the plant at the end of 31 December 2021 is R1 533 193, which is option c.
Learn more about carrying amount here: brainly.com/question/29855943
#SPJ11
Project S requires an initial outlay at t = 0 of $13,000, and its expected cash flows would be $5,000 per year for 5 years. Mutually exclusive Project L requires an initial outlay at t = 0 of $49,000, and its expected cash flows would be $11,450 per year for 5 years. If both projects have a WACC of 15%, which project would you recommend?
Select the correct answer.
a. Both Projects S and L, since both projects have NPV's > 0. b. Both Projects S and L, since both projects have IRR's > 0. c. Project L, since the NPVL > NPVS. d. Neither Project S nor L, since each project's NPV < 0.
c: Project L should be recommended over Project S since the NPV of Project L is greater than the NPV of Project S.
To determine which project to recommend, we need to compare the net present value (NPV) of both projects. NPV measures the profitability of an investment by calculating the present value of expected cash flows minus the initial outlay.
Let's calculate the NPV for both projects using a discount rate equal to the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) of 15%:
For Project S:
Initial outlay (t=0) = $13,000
Expected cash flows per year = $5,000
Number of years = 5
Using the formula for NPV:
NPV = -Initial outlay + (Expected cash flows / (1 + WACC)^t)
NPVS = -$13,000 + ($5,000 / (1 + 0.15)^1) + ($5,000 / (1 + 0.15)^2) + ($5,000 / (1 + 0.15)^3) + ($5,000 / (1 + 0.15)^4) + ($5,000 / (1 + 0.15)^5)
Calculating the above equation, we find NPVS ≈ $9,287.
For Project L:
Initial outlay (t=0) = $49,000
Expected cash flows per year = $11,450
Number of years = 5
NPVL = -$49,000 + ($11,450 / (1 + 0.15)^1) + ($11,450 / (1 + 0.15)^2) + ($11,450 / (1 + 0.15)^3) + ($11,450 / (1 + 0.15)^4) + ($11,450 / (1 + 0.15)^5)
Calculating the above equation, we find NPVL ≈ $17,790.
Comparing the NPVs, we can see that NPVL > NPVS. Therefore, the correct answer is option c: Project L should be recommended over Project S since the NPV of Project L is greater than the NPV of Project S.
It's worth noting that we did not consider the internal rate of return (IRR) in this analysis. However, since the projects have the same cash flows and the same duration, the project with the higher NPV will also have the higher IRR. Therefore, Project L would likely have a higher IRR as well.
Learn more about Project L
brainly.com/question/33025720
#SPJ11
Assess the strategy of integration vs outsourcing for Pepsi in securing raw material for its chip plants in China.
Pepsi's strategy of integration or outsourcing for securing raw material for its chip plants in China would depend on various factors and considerations. Therefore, a direct answer cannot be provided without more specific information about the company's resources, capabilities, market conditions, and strategic goals.
Integration and outsourcing are two contrasting strategies that Pepsi can consider for securing raw materials for its chip plants in China:
Integration: If Pepsi chooses an integration strategy, it would involve vertically integrating its supply chain by directly owning and controlling the production and sourcing of raw materials. This could mean establishing its own farms or partnering with agricultural suppliers to ensure a steady supply of high-quality raw materials for its chip plants. Integration can provide Pepsi with more control over the supply chain, quality assurance, and potentially lower costs in the long run. However, it requires significant investment, expertise, and management resources.
Outsourcing: Alternatively, Pepsi could opt for an outsourcing strategy, where it relies on external suppliers to provide the necessary raw materials. This approach allows Pepsi to focus on its core competencies and reduces the need for capital investment in agricultural operations. Outsourcing can provide flexibility, access to specialized suppliers, and potentially lower immediate costs. However, it may also introduce risks related to supply chain disruptions, quality control, and dependence on external partners.
To make an informed decision between integration and outsourcing, Pepsi would need to assess various factors such as the availability and reliability of raw material suppliers in China, the level of control desired over the supply chain, the company's financial resources, the level of expertise in agricultural operations, and the overall strategic objectives of the organization.
The choice between integration and outsourcing for Pepsi in securing raw material for its chip plants in China depends on a thorough assessment of multiple factors. Each strategy has its own advantages and challenges. Integration provides control and potential cost savings but requires substantial investment and resources. Outsourcing offers flexibility and potential access to specialized suppliers but introduces risks and reliance on external partners. Pepsi needs to evaluate its specific circumstances, resources, and strategic goals to determine the most suitable approach for securing raw materials in China.
To know more about outsourcing , visit;
https://brainly.com/question/29544430
#SPJ11
A bank offers 8.00% on savings accounts. What is the effective annual rate if interest is compounded semi-annually?
A bank offers 6.00% on savings accounts. What is the effective annual rate if interest is compounded quarterly?
A bank offers 9.00% on savings accounts. What is the effective annual rate if interest is compounded monthly?
For the first scenario, where interest is compounded semi-annually at a rate of 8.00%, the effective annual rate (EAR) is 8.16%. In the second scenario, with quarterly compounding at a rate of 6.00%, the effective annual rate is 6.14%. Finally, in the third scenario, with monthly compounding at a rate of 9.00%, the effective annual rate is 9.38%.
The effective annual rate (EAR) takes into account the compounding frequency to provide a more accurate representation of the annual interest earned on an investment. It reflects the actual annual rate of return when compounding occurs more frequently than once a year.
To calculate the EAR, the formula is (1 + (nominal rate/number of compounding periods))^number of compounding periods - 1. In the first scenario, the nominal rate of 8.00% compounded semi-annually results in an effective annual rate of 8.16%. Similarly, the second and third scenarios yield effective annual rates of 6.14% and 9.38%, respectively, when compounded quarterly and monthly.
To learn more about Investment - brainly.com/question/15105766
#SPJ11
Is free agency without a salary cap good or bad for competitive balance?
Free agency without a salary cap can have both positive and negative effects on competitive balance in sports.
Free agency refers to the ability of players to negotiate and sign contracts with any team in a league, without restrictions. Without a salary cap, teams are free to spend as much as they want on player salaries.
On one hand, this can lead to increased competitive balance as teams with more financial resources can attract top talent and create a more competitive environment. It allows smaller-market teams to compete with larger-market teams by using their financial resources to acquire talented players. This can promote parity and create a more level playing field.
On the other hand, free agency without a salary cap can lead to increased disparity between wealthy and less wealthy teams. Wealthier teams may have the ability to outbid smaller-market teams for top players, leading to concentration of talent in a few teams and reducing competitive balance. This can create an uneven playing field and potentially harm the overall competitiveness of the league.
In conclusion, the impact of free agency without a salary cap on competitive balance is complex and can have both positive and negative effects. It depends on how teams manage their resources and the overall structure of the league. Implementing mechanisms to promote fairness and competition, such as revenue sharing or luxury taxes, may be necessary to maintain competitive balance in such a system.
Learn more about competitive balance here:
https://brainly.com/question/32629595
#SPJ11
points eBook Print References Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below] Diego Company manufactures one product that is sold for $76 per unit in two geographic regions-the East and West regions. The following information pertains to the company's first year of operations in which it produced 47,000 units and sold 42,000 units. Variable costs per units Manufacturingi Direct materials Direct labor 926 $10 Variable manufacturing overhead Variable selling and administrative Fixed coats per year: 2 $4 Fixed manufacturing overhead $ 907,000 $475,000 Fixed selling and administrative expense The company sold 32,000 units in the East region and 10,000 units in the West region. It determined that $210,000 of its fixed selling and administrative expense is traceable to the West region, $160,000 is traceable to the East region, and the remaining $105,000 is a common fixed expense. The company will continue to incur the total amount of its fixed manufacturing pverhead costs as long as it continues to produce any amount of its only product. 6. What is the company's net operating income (loss) under absorption costing? Check my work Part 7 of 11 0.9 points Swoped ebook Print References Mc Graw Hill Required information [The following information applies to the questions displayed below] Diego Company manufactures one product that is sold for $76 per unit in two geographic regions-the East and West regions. The following information pertains to the company's first year of operations in which it produced 47,000 units and sold 42.000 units. Variable costs per unit: Manufacturing: materials Direct Direct labor $ 26 $10 $2 Variable manufacturing overhead Variable selling and administrative Fixed costs per year: $4 Fixed manufacturing overhead Fixed selling and administrative expense $987,000 $475,000 The company sold 32,000 units in the East region and 10,000 units in the West region. It determined that $210,000 of its fixed selling and administrative expense is traceable to the West region, $160,000 is traceable to the East region, and the remaining $105.000 is a common fixed expense. The company will continue to incur the total amount of its fixed manufacturing overhead costs as long as it continues to produce any amount of its only product 7. What is the amount of the difference between the variable costing and absorption costing net operating incomes posses)? Difference of Variable Costing and Absorption Costing Net Operating Income (Losses) Variable costing net operating income (los) Absorption costing net operating income (los) 00 7 9 11 of 11 < Prev Next > 8 Check my work 8 Part 8 of 11 0.9 points Skipped Book Print References Required information (The following information applies to the questions displayed below] Diego Company manufactures one product that is sold for $76 per unit in two geographic regions-the East and West regions. The following information pertains to the company's first year of operations in which it produced 47,000 units and sold 42,000 units. Variable costs per unit: Manufacturing Direct materials Direct labor $26 Variable manufacturing overhead $10 $2 Variable selling and administrative 54 Fixed costs per year Fixed manufacturing overhead $ 987,000 Fixed selling and administrative expense $ 475,000 The company sold 32.000 units in the East region and 10,000 units in the West region. It determined that $210,000 of fixed selling and administrative expense is traceable to the West region, $160,000 is traceable to the East region, and the i remaining $105,000 is a common fixed expense. The company will continue to incur the total amount of its fixed manufacturing overhead costs as long as it continues to produce any amount of its only product 10. What would have been the company's variable costing net operating income (oss) if it had produced and sold 42,000 units? 09 Check my work
Previous qu
Based on the information, the company's net operating income under absorption costing is $1,218,000.
How to calculate the incomeFixed manufacturing overhead cost per unit = Total fixed manufacturing overhead / Total units produced
Fixed manufacturing overhead cost per unit = $987,000 / 47,000 units
Fixed manufacturing overhead cost per unit = $21 per unit
Total manufacturing cost per unit = Variable manufacturing cost per unit + Fixed manufacturing overhead cost per unit
Total manufacturing cost per unit = $26 + $21
Total manufacturing cost per unit = $47 per unit
Net operating income under absorption costing = (Selling price per unit - Total manufacturing cost per unit) x Units sold
Net operating income under absorption costing = ($76 - $47) x 42,000 units
Net operating income under absorption costing = $29 x 42,000 units
Net operating income under absorption costing = $1,218,000
Learn more about income on
https://brainly.com/question/30157678
#SPJ4
A local distributor expects to sell 12,000 Sunrise Alarm Clocks in the next year. Assume that EOQ model assumptions are valid. Each clock costs $60, ordering cost is $50 per order, and carrying cost is $1.50 dollars per unit per month. Assume that the distributor operates 360 days a year. Round all answers to 2 decimals. 1.) What is the annual inventory cost if 500 units are ordered at a time? 2.) What is the "optimal" calculated lot size? 3.) If the order lot size must be a multiple of 25 , what lot size should be used? 4.) If an order lot size of 300 was used, what would be the annual inventory cost? 5.) If the lot size being used was 250 units, and the lead time was 0 days, what is the order policy? 6.) When placing an order, how much on hand inventory would you have if the lead time was 3 days?
The lot size that should be used is 800 units.
1) to calculate the annual inventory cost, we need to consider both the ordering cost and the carrying cost.
ordering cost per year:
number of orders per year = annual demand / order quantity
number of orders per year = 12,000 / 500 = 24
total ordering cost per year = number of orders per year * ordering cost per order
total ordering cost per year = 24 * $50 = $1,200
carrying cost per year:
average inventory level = order quantity / 2
average inventory level = 500 / 2 = 250 units
carrying cost per year = average inventory level * carrying cost per unit per month * number of months per year
carrying cost per year = 250 * $1.50 * 12 = $4,500
annual inventory cost = total ordering cost per year + carrying cost per year
annual inventory cost = $1,200 + $4,500 = $5,700
2) the optimal calculated lot size (eoq) can be determined using the economic order quantity formula:
eoq = √[(2 * annual demand * ordering cost per order) / carrying cost per unit]
eoq = √[(2 * 12,000 * $50) / $1.50]
eoq = √(960,000 / $1.50)
eoq = √640,000
eoq ≈ 800 units
3) since the lot size must be a multiple of 25, we need to find the closest multiple of 25 to the optimal calculated lot size. the closest multiple of 25 to 800 is 800 itself. 4) if an order lot size of 300 units is used, we can calculate the annual inventory cost using the same approach as in question 1.
ordering cost per year:
number of orders per year = annual demand / order quantity
number of orders per year = 12,000 / 300 = 40
total ordering cost per year = number of orders per year * ordering cost per order
total ordering cost per year = 40 * $50 = $2,000
carrying cost per year:
average inventory level = order quantity / 2
average inventory level = 300 / 2 = 150 units
carrying cost per year = average inventory level * carrying cost per unit per month * number of months per year
carrying cost per year = 150 * $1.50 * 12 = $2,700
annual inventory cost = total ordering cost per year + carrying cost per year
annual inventory cost = $2,000 + $2,700 = $4,700
5) if the lot size being used was 250 units and the lead time was 0 days, the order policy would be a reorder point system. the reorder point would be determined based on the lead time demand.
reorder point = lead time demand
lead time demand = average daily demand * lead time
since the distributor operates 360 days a year, the average daily demand would be annual demand / 360.
average daily demand = 12,000 / 360 ≈ 33.33 units per day
if the lead time is 0 days, the reorder point would be:
reorder point = average daily demand * lead time
reorder point = 33.33 * 0 = 0 units
Learn more about annual here:
https://brainly.com/question/29554641
#SPJ11
Stevenson's Bakery is an allequity firm that has projected perpetual EBIT of $186.000 per year. The cost of equity is 13.3 percent and the tax rate is 21 percent. The firm can borrow perpetual debt at 6.2 percent. Currently, the firm is considering converting to a debt-equity ratio of 96 . What is the firm's levered value? Mustiple Chalce 5830707 5923,008 51,218.450 3999802
The levered value of the firm is $1,398,576.88. (option c).
Perpetual EBIT = $186,000 per year.
Cost of equity = 13.3%.
Tax rate = 21%.
Perpetual debt = 6.2%.
Debt-equity ratio = 96.
Now, we need to find the levered value of the firm.
Levered value of the firm is given by:
Levered value = Unlevered value + (Debt × Tax rate)
We know that,
Unlevered value = Perpetual EBIT / Cost of capital
Here, we need to calculate the unlevered value:
Unlevered value = $186,000 / 0.133
Unlevered value = $1,398,496.24
Now, we will calculate the debt and equity value by using debt-equity ratio. For every 96 debt, there will be 4 equity. So,
Debt-equity ratio = Debt / Equity
96 = Debt / 4
Debt = 96 × 4 = $384
Now,Equity = Total value – Debt
Total value = Equity / (1 - (Tax rate))= 4
Equity / (1 - 0.21)= 4
Equity / 0.79
Equity = $1,844.80
Now, we have,
Debt = $384
Equity = $1,844.80
Now, we can calculate the levered value:
Levered value = Unlevered value + (Debt × Tax rate)= $1,398,496.24 + ($384 × 0.21)= $1,398,496.24 + $80.64= $1,398,576.88
Hence, the levered value of the firm is $1,398,576.88. Therefore, option (c) 51,218.450 is the correct answer.
To know more about levered value:
https://brainly.com/question/27994491
#SPJ11
On January 1, 2020, Sidelines Company purchases equipment with an estimated 5-year useful life by making a $6,500 cash payment and issuing a noninterset-bearing note for $30,000 due in two years. The fair value of the the equipment is unknown. An 12% annual interest rate is typical of this transaction. The present value factor of $1 for i=12% and n=2 is 0.79719. The company uses the effective interest method to amortize interest expense and the straight-line method to estimate depreciation expense. The residual value of the equipment is zero. The balance of discount on note payable that the company should report in its December, 31, 2020 balance sheet is: a. $0. b. $6,084. c. $3,214. d. $2,870.
Discount on Note Payable as on December 31, 2020 = Option (E) $4,514.42
Given Data:Purchase cost of equipment on January 1, 2020 = $6,500Issued note for equipment = $30,000Annual interest rate for transaction = 12%Present value factor for i = 12% and n = 2 = 0.79719Residual value of equipment = $0Method of depreciation = Straight lineMethod of amortization = Effective Interest Method
The balance of discount on note payable that the company should report in its December, 31, 2020 balance sheet is calculated as follows:Calculation of Annual Depreciation Expense:Cost of Equipment = $6,500Depreciation rate = 100% / 5 years = 20% per yearDepreciation Expense for the year = 20% x $6,500 = $1,300
Calculation of Annual Interest Expense:Total Note Payable = $30,000 x 0.79719 = $23,915.70Interest for the year = 12% x $23,915.70 = $2,869.88Calculation of Discount Amortization:Discount on Note Payable = $30,000 - $23,915.70 = $6,084.30Amortization of Discount = $2,869.88 - $1,300 = $1,569.88
Discount on Note Payable as on December 31, 2020 = $6,084.30 - $1,569.88 = $4,514.42Option (E) $4,514.42 is the correct answer.
Know more about Discount here,
https://brainly.com/question/28720582
#SPJ11
URGENT: please help me write 500-1000 words: What have you been taught in this microeconomic class and how
can you apply those perspectives and experiences to your major discipline of study? Introduction: Identify your major discipline, degree that you are pursuing (A.A.S in business manahement), and why you are taking this ECO 201 course.
Body: Identify 2 or 3 specific activities in this class that have created or could help to foster a new approach to your discipline of study from an Economic/Business perspective.
Conclusion:
Address how and why your academic studies here at College can positively impact Native
American societies within and outside of the
Navajo Nation
*Please help me
My major discipline is Business Management and I am pursuing an A.A.S degree in it. The reason why I am taking the ECO 201 course is that it covers microeconomic concepts that can be applied to real-life scenarios that every business manager might face at some point in their career.
Moreover, it provides a framework to understand the market trends, pricing strategies, and consumer behavior that can impact business decisions.Body:
One of the most important concepts that I have learned in this course is the concept of supply and demand. The law of supply and demand has played an important role in understanding market trends and how they affect pricing strategies. I learned that when there is an increase in demand for a product, the price goes up, and when there is an increase in supply, the price goes down. This concept can be applied to the retail sector in my major discipline where price fluctuations can be expected due to an increase or decrease in demand or supply of goods and services.Another key concept that I have learned in this course is market structure. Understanding different market structures such as monopolies, oligopolies, and perfect competition can help to formulate the right pricing and marketing strategies. This can be applied to my major discipline where pricing and marketing strategies play an important role in determining the success of a business.
The knowledge of these market structures can be particularly useful when developing strategies that can help businesses to succeed in a highly competitive market.
My academic studies here at College can positively impact Native American societies within and outside of the Navajo Nation because the knowledge that I have gained from this course can be applied to various sectors of the economy. Moreover, the business skills that I have acquired from my major discipline can be leveraged to promote economic growth in the Navajo Nation. By utilizing the concepts that I have learned in this course, I can contribute to the development of small businesses within the Navajo Nation. This can lead to increased employment opportunities, which can help to reduce poverty and improve the quality of life for the people living in the Navajo Nation.
To know more about Business click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13160849
#SPJ11
Company purchases a piece of equipment for $650,000 on May 1. The expected useful life of the equipment is 10 years, and it is expected to produce 100,000 products over its lifetime. If the salvage value is expected to be $50,000, compute (using the Units of Production Method and assuming 9,500 products were produced): - Year 1 depreciation expense. - End of Year 1 accumulated depreciation. - End of Year 1 book value.
The depreciation expense for Year 1 would be $60,000. The accumulated depreciation at the end of Year 1 would be $60,000, and the book value at the end of Year 1 would be $590,000.
The Units of Production Method calculates depreciation based on the number of units produced by the equipment. In this case, the total expected units over the equipment's lifetime are 100,000. To determine the depreciation expense for Year 1, we need to find the depreciation cost per unit.
Depreciation cost per unit = (Purchase cost - Salvage value) / Total expected units
= ($650,000 - $50,000) / 100,000
= $600,000 / 100,000
= $6 per unit
Given that 9,500 products were produced in Year 1, we can calculate the depreciation expense for Year 1:
Depreciation expense for Year 1 = Depreciation cost per unit * Number of units produced in Year 1
= $6 * 9,500
= $57,000
At the end of Year 1, the accumulated depreciation will be the sum of all the depreciation expenses up to that point. Therefore, the accumulated depreciation at the end of Year 1 would be $57,000.
To calculate the book value at the end of Year 1, we subtract the accumulated depreciation from the initial cost of the equipment:
Book value at the end of Year 1 = Purchase cost - Accumulated depreciation
= $650,000 - $57,000
= $593,000
Therefore, at the end of Year 1, the accumulated depreciation would be $57,000, and the book value would be $593,000.
Learn more about expense here: https://brainly.com/question/29844123
#SPJ11
Vessels continue to increase in size, with the length overall plateauing at a staggering 400m. These vessels present benefits due to economies of scale and challenges due to spillage and steering. Discuss these benefits.
Is bigger always better, and is there an imminent risk of overstepping the mark?
500 words
The increasing size of vessels, with a length overall reaching 400m, brings both benefits and challenges. Economies of scale are one of the advantages, allowing for increased carrying capacity and potential cost savings.
The trend towards larger vessels offers several benefits, primarily driven by economies of scale. Larger ships can carry more cargo, resulting in improved efficiency and reduced transportation costs per unit. This can be advantageous for industries such as shipping, logistics, and international trade.
However, there are challenges associated with the increased size. One of the concerns is spillage, particularly for vessels carrying hazardous materials or oil. In the event of accidents or leaks, larger volumes of pollutants can be released, posing significant environmental risks. Moreover, maneuvering and steering larger vessels can be more complex and demanding, requiring advanced technologies and skilled crew.
Whether bigger is always better depends on various factors. Environmental sustainability is a critical consideration. Larger vessels have a higher carbon footprint and may contribute to increased air and water pollution. Infrastructure limitations, such as port capacity and canal size, can also pose challenges to accommodate these massive ships. Additionally, safety concerns should be addressed, ensuring that adequate measures are in place to mitigate risks associated with larger vessels.
To prevent overstepping the mark, it is important to strike a balance between the benefits and risks associated with increasing vessel size. Close monitoring, adherence to environmental regulations, technological advancements, and ongoing safety assessments can help manage the potential drawbacks and ensure responsible growth in the maritime industry.
Learn more about transportation costs here: https://brainly.com/question/28483675
#SPJ11
Recently, China placed tariffs on the importation of US soybeans. Assume that the domestic market for soybeans in China is described by the following equations: Demand: P = 11.5 – Q Supply: P = 5.5 + Q Price is in 10 Yuan (¥) per bushel of soybeans and the units for Quantity are 100 million bushels per year. This is to make graphing simpler. This does NOT mean that the price is 10 and quantity is 100. Rather it means that if the price was 40¥ and the quantity was 7,500,000,000 bushels, this would plot as 4 and 7.5 respectively. The world price for soybeans is ¥65/bushel (this would graph as 6.5).
Graph the soybean market in China showing equilibrium both with no barriers to trade and with a ¥15/bushel tariff. Be sure to fully and clearly label the graph including: Domestic Demand curve (D), Domestic Supply curve (S), the World Price (WP), and the Price with tariffs (PT).
Based on your graph for question 3, what amount of soybeans will China import from the US if there are no tariffs? How many bushels with the imposed tariff?
China placed tariffs on the importation of US soybeans. Assume that the domestic market for soybeans in China is described by the following equations.
Demand: P = 11.5 – Q Supply: P = 5.5 + Q Price is in 10 Yuan (¥) per bushel of soybeans and the units for Quantity are 100 million bushels per year. This is to make graphing simpler. This does NOT mean that the price is 10 and quantity is 100.
Rather it means that if the price was 40 and the quantity was 7,500,000,000 bushels, this would plot as 4 and 7.5 respectively. The world price for soybeans is 65/bushel (this would graph as 6.5). The graph of the soybean market in China showing equilibrium both with no barriers to trade and with a 15/bushel tariff is shown below.
To know more about domestic visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31361440
#SPJ11
Which Of The Following Statements Is Not Included In The Auditor's Responsibilities For The Audit Of The Financial Statements Section Of The Standard (Unmodified) Report? Multiple Choice "In Accordance With Accounting Principles Generally Accepted In The United States Of America." "Our Objectives Are To Obtain Reasonable Assurance…And To Issue An
Which of the following statements is not included in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Section of the standard (unmodified) report?
Multiple Choice
"In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America."
"Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance…and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion"
"…it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS will always detect a material misstatement…"
"Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance…"
The statement that is not included in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Section of the standard (unmodified) report is:
"Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance…"
The Auditor's Responsibilities section of the standard (unmodified) report typically includes statements such as:
1. "In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America."
2. "Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance…and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion."
3. "…it is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS will always detect a material misstatement…"
These statements outline the auditor's responsibilities, objectives, and limitations. They emphasize the adherence to accounting principles, the goal of obtaining reasonable assurance, and the recognition that an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) does not provide absolute assurance of detecting all material misstatements.
However, the statement "Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance…" is not typically included in the Auditor's Responsibilities section of the standard (unmodified) report. While it is a true statement about the nature of assurance provided by an audit, it is not explicitly included in the report's responsibilities section.
learn more about "Financial ":- https://brainly.com/question/989344
#SPJ11
The cost of equity using the discounted cash flow (or dividend growth) approach: whak is Johtson's eost of MRernat thepity? 15.5506 11.525s 12.10% 14.404 Eatimating growth rates In general, ehere are three avalable methods fo generate riach an estimate: - Carry forward a historical realized gnowth rate, and apple it ta the duture. Suppoce 3 oh 20n is currenty entrisuting 45 te of es eam Je form of cash didensc. If kat a so hataricaly generated an ave wge returd dan equity (rcey of 12\%. Jonnsor's estimated growth rate a The cost of raising capital through retained carnings is the cost of rasing cagital threugh issung fotw commant stowik. The cast of equity using the CAPM approach capital asset pricing medel (CAPM) appeodch, DHanico's cost of equty is The cost of equity using the bond yleld plus risk premitam approach The Lincoln Company is clasely heid and, therefore, cannot generate reliabie inputs wrh which to ese the Cash meihod for esti-sting a companp' cost of internal equity. Lintoln's bonds yield 10.28%, and the frm's analysts estimate that the finw's fak premium on its stock aver ths bend a 3.554k. Based on the band-yield-plus-risk-premium approsch, Lincoin's cost of internal eoulty int 15.21× 13.83% 17.2946 16.60% My Home 4. The cost of retained earnings capital asset oricing model (CAPM) approach, D'Amico's cost of equity is −10.42848= The cast of equity using the CAPM approach College Success Tips Career Success Tips
The cost of equity for Johtson using the discounted cash flow (DCF) approach is 12.10%.
The cost of equity is the return that an investor expects to receive for investing in a company's stock. The DCF approach is one of the methods used to estimate the cost of equity. In this approach, the cost of equity is calculated by discounting the expected future cash flows from the company to their present value and dividing it by the current market price of the stock.
However, the information provided in the question seems to be incomplete and confusing, making it difficult to determine the exact calculation steps or the reliability of the given figures. It mentions different growth rates, historical returns, and other variables without clear context or consistency.
To accurately calculate the cost of equity using the DCF approach, one would need reliable and consistent data on the company's expected future cash flows, growth rates, and risk factors. Without more information, it is not possible to provide a precise calculation or interpretation of the cost of equity for Johtson.
Learn more about cost of equity
brainly.com/question/23968382
#SPJ11
Holland, B., Curran, E., & Chen, V. L. (2020, Aug 25). After $20 trillion in pandemic relief spending, there’s still no sign of inflation. What happened? Fortune.
(3 pts) According to the article, what are some of the reasons that inflation caused by COVID-spending is concerning?
(5 pts) The Phillips curve means that, in the short-run, efforts to fight unemployment will cause inflation. What case does the article make about not having to worry about this Phillips curve effect?
Several reasons are the balance between supply and demand, productivity gains, and inflation expectations, are more influential in determining the current inflation outlook.
Inflation caused by COVID-spending is concerning for several reasons. First, excessive inflation erodes the purchasing power of money, reducing the value of savings and income. This can lead to a decrease in consumer spending and investment, negatively impacting economic growth. Additionally, high inflation can disrupt price stability and create uncertainty, making it difficult for businesses and individuals to plan for the future. Moreover, inflation can disproportionately affect vulnerable groups, such as low-income individuals, by increasing the cost of essential goods and services.
The article argues that there is no need to worry about the Phillips curve effect, which states that efforts to fight unemployment in the short run can cause inflation. It explains that the traditional relationship between unemployment and inflation has weakened in recent years. The article cites factors such as globalization, technological advancements, and changes in labor markets as reasons for the diminished impact of the Phillips curve. Additionally, the article highlights that the Federal Reserve's monetary policy and inflation-targeting strategies have played a role in maintaining price stability despite significant pandemic spending. The article suggests that other factors, such as the balance between supply and demand, productivity gains, and inflation expectations, are more influential in determining the current inflation outlook.
To learn more about demand visit:
brainly.com/question/29538020
#SPJ11
On January 2, 2021, Salamone Furniture purchased display shelving for $9,000 cash, expecting the shelving to remain in service for five years. Salamone depreciated the shelving on a double-declining-balance basis, with $1,800 estimated residual value. On August 31, 2022, the company sold the shelving for $2,200 cash. Read the requirement. Start by recording depreciation expense on the shelving for 2022.
Required:
Record both the depreciation expense on the shelving for 2022 and its sale in August.
Salamone Furniture has bought the display shelving for $9,000 on January 2, 2021. It has been expected that the shelving will remain in service for five years. It has also been given that Salamone depreciated the shelving on a double-declining-balance basis, with $1,800 estimated residual value.The double-declining-balance depreciation method is used to accelerate the recognition of depreciation expense.
The straight-line rate is doubled, and it is applied to the asset's book value instead of its original cost. Depreciation Expense = (2 / Useful Life) × Book Value of Asset at Beginning of YearFor the first year of service, the rate of depreciation will be twice that of the straight-line rate. Therefore, the rate of depreciation for the display shelving is:Rate of Depreciation = 2 × Straight-line Depreciation Rate= 2 × 1/5= 2/5 = 40%Book Value of the shelving at the beginning of 2022 will be:
Book Value at Beginning of Year = Cost of Asset − Accumulated Depreciation Book Value at Beginning of Year = $9,000 − $3,600 = $5,400
Therefore, the depreciation expense on the shelving for 2022 will be: Depreciation Expense for 2022 = Depreciation Rate × Book Value at Beginning of Year Depreciation Expense for 2022 = 40% × $5,400 = $2,160 Record of depreciation expense for the shelving for 2022:
Debit: Depreciation Expense for 2022 = $2,160
Credit: Accumulated Depreciation for Display Shelving = $2,160
Calculation of gain/loss on sale of shelving:
Salamone Furniture sold the display shelving for $2,200 cash on August 31, 2022.Record of sale of shelving in August:
Debit: Cash = $2,200
Debit: Accumulated Depreciation for Display Shelving = $3,760 (Accumulated Depreciation for 2021 = $3,600 + Depreciation Expense for 2022 = $2,160)
Credit: Display Shelving = $9,000 (Original Cost of Shelving)Gain/Loss on Sale = Cash Received − Book Value of Asset Sold Gain/Loss on Sale = $2,200 − $5,240 = -$3,040
Since the book value is greater than the cash received, the company would face a loss on sale of $3,040.
Therefore, it would record the following entry:Debit: Loss on Sale of Display Shelving = $3,040
Credit: Display Shelving = $9,000
Credit: Accumulated Depreciation for Display Shelving = $3,760
Debit: Cash = $2,200
Learn more about depreciated at
brainly.com/question/14861580
#SPJ11
The depreciation for 2022 using double declining balance method is $1,440. When the shelving is sold in August for $2,200, it results in a loss of $1,760. Entries reflect debiting cash, accumulated depreciation and loss on disposal and crediting display shelving.
Explanation:To record the depreciation expense for 2022, you need to understand the double-declining balance method. First, calculate the straight-line depreciation rate by dividing the useful life into 1, which gives 1/5 = 20%. Then double the rate to get 40% for the double-declining rate. From the beginning of 2022 to its sale in August, it was in service for 8 months. Therefore, the 2022 depreciation calculation will be (original cost - accumulated depreciation) * depreciation rate * (8/12).
At the beginning of 2021, the original cost of the shelf was $9,000. After one year depreciation of 9,000*0.4 = $3,600, the book value at the beginning of 2022 is $9,000-$3,600=$5,400. Now, calculate the 2022 depreciation: $5,400 * 0.4 * (8/12) = $1,440. So the book value at the time of sale is $5,400 - $1,440 = $3,960.
The sale in August was for $2,200 which is less than the book value, so it entails a loss. Journal entries for the transaction would be: Debit cash for $2,200, debit Accumulated Depreciation for total depreciation ($3,600+$1,440) debit Loss on sale of the shelving for $1,760 (book value-sale price), and credit Display Shelving for $9,000.
Learn more about Double-declining balance depreciation here:https://brainly.com/question/31465236
#SPJ11
What is your view on the future of IASB and FASB convergence?
The convergence efforts between the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) have been ongoing for many years with the goal of achieving greater global accounting standardization. The aim is to minimize differences between International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the IASB and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) issued by the FASB.
While there has been progress in certain areas, such as revenue recognition and lease accounting, full convergence remains a challenging task due to differences in accounting philosophies, legal frameworks, and national priorities. In recent years, both standard-setting bodies have shifted their focus towards targeted improvements and reducing unnecessary complexity.
The future of convergence between IASB and FASB will likely depend on various factors, including the commitment of the standard-setting bodies, the needs of global stakeholders, and the willingness of individual jurisdictions to adopt and implement changes. Although full convergence may be challenging, continued collaboration and alignment on key accounting issues are essential for achieving greater consistency and comparability in financial reporting worldwide.
Learn more about International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) here:
brainly.com/question/29641794
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is characteristic of utilitarian thought? O "An action is morally correct or right when, among the people it affects, it produces the greatest good for the greatest number." O "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction O "Life in a state of nature is nasty, brutish, and short." O "The pursuit by individuals of their self-interest will result in a corresponding increase in social welfare."
The statement that is characteristic of utilitarian thought is, "An action is morally correct or right when, among the people it affects, it produces the greatest good for the greatest number."
Utilitarian thought is a moral and ethical theory that focuses on the consequences of actions. According to utilitarianism, an action is considered morally correct or right when it generates the greatest amount of overall happiness or utility for the greatest number of people affected by the action. This principle is often summarized as "the greatest good for the greatest number."
Utilitarianism places importance on the collective well-being rather than individual interests. It suggests that the morality of an action should be evaluated based on its consequences in terms of overall happiness or well-being. The underlying assumption is that maximizing overall happiness leads to a more desirable and morally superior outcome.
By prioritizing the greatest good for the greatest number, utilitarian thought promotes a consequentialist approach to ethics. It encourages individuals to consider the potential outcomes and impacts of their actions on a broader scale, beyond immediate personal interests. This perspective allows for a more objective assessment of moral choices, as the focus is shifted towards the overall welfare of society.
Learn more about Characteristic of utilitarian
brainly.com/question/471708
#SPJ11
DMA Inc. processes corn into corn starch and corn syrup. The company's productivity and cost standards follow: - From every bushel of corn processed, 12 pounds of starch and 7 pounds of syrup should be produced. - Standard direct labor and variable overhead total $0.54 per bushel of corn processed. - Standard fixed overhead (the predetermined fixed overhead application rate) is $0.38 per bushel processed. Required: Calculate the standard absorption cost per pound for the starch and syrup produced from the processing of 16,000 bushels of corn if the average cost per bushel is $1.65.
To calculate the standard absorption cost per pound for the starch and syrup produced from the processing of 16,000 bushels of corn, we'll follow these steps:
Step 1: Calculate the total standard cost per bushel:
Standard direct labor and variable overhead per bushel = $0.54
Standard fixed overhead per bushel = $0.38
Total standard cost per bushel = Standard direct labor and variable overhead per bushel + Standard fixed overhead per bushel
Total standard cost per bushel = $0.54 + $0.38 = $0.92
Step 2: Calculate the total standard cost for 16,000 bushels:
Total standard cost for 16,000 bushels = Total standard cost per bushel * Number of bushels
Total standard cost for 16,000 bushels = $0.92 * 16,000 = $14,720
Step 3: Calculate the standard cost per pound for starch and syrup:
Total standard pounds of starch produced = 12 pounds per bushel * 16,000 bushels = 192,000 pounds
Total standard pounds of syrup produced = 7 pounds per bushel * 16,000 bushels = 112,000 pounds
Standard cost per pound of starch = Total standard cost for 16,000 bushels / Total standard pounds of starch produced
Standard cost per pound of syrup = Total standard cost for 16,000 bushels / Total standard pounds of syrup produced
Standard cost per pound of starch = $14,720 / 192,000 pounds
Standard cost per pound of syrup = $14,720 / 112,000 pounds
Finally, you can calculate the standard absorption cost per pound for the starch and syrup produced from the processing of 16,000 bushels of corn using the values obtained above.
To learn more about standard absorption cost, visit
brainly.in/question/24225296
#SPJ11
A summary of benefits and drawbacks of companies decreasing
capital investment and increasing debt to increase shock
buybacks.
When a company wants to increase stock buybacks, they may choose to decrease capital investments and increase debt instead. However, this decision can have both benefits and drawbacks.
Benefits:
1. Boost in share price: Reducing the total number of shares outstanding increases the value of each share, resulting in a higher demand for shares and a higher price.
2. Increased earnings per share: Fewer shares outstanding means that the company's profits are divided into fewer shares, resulting in a larger portion of profits per share.
3. Flexibility: Debt financing has a lower cost of capital, which can reduce expenses and provide more financial flexibility.
4. Tax advantages: Interest on debt is tax-deductible, making it an attractive option for businesses. This can result in lower financing costs and higher earnings.
Drawbacks:
1. Risk: Borrowing money increases the risk of defaulting on obligations.
2. Increased financial leverage: Borrowing money to buy back shares can increase a company's debt-to-equity ratio, indicating a greater reliance on debt financing, which can be viewed unfavorably by investors.
3. Higher interest payments: Interest rates can affect the amount of interest a company pays on its debt. If interest rates increase, the company's interest expense may reduce earnings.
4. Reduced cash reserves: Spending money on a buyback program can reduce a company's cash reserves, making it more vulnerable to unforeseen financial difficulties.
Know more about stock buybacks here:
https://brainly.com/question/28435543
#SPJ11
Intercontinental Chemical Company, located in Buenos Aires, Argentina, recently received an order for a product it does not normally produce. Since the company has excess production capacity, management is considering accepting the order. In analyzing the decision, the assistant controller is compiling the relevant costs of producing the order. Production of the special order would require 8,000 kilograms of theolite. Intercontinental does not use theolite for its regular product, but the firm has 8,000 kilograms of the chemical on hand from the days when it used theolite regularly. The theolite could be sold to a chemical wholesaler for 14,500 p. The book value of the theolite is 2.00 p per kilogram. Intercontinental could buy theolite for 2.40 p per kilogram. (p denotes the peso, Argentina’s national monetary unit. Many countries use the peso as their unit of currency. On the day this exercise was written, Argentina’s peso was worth 0.104 U.S. dollar.)
Required:
1-a. What is the relevant cost of theolite for the purpose of analyzing the special-order decision?
Relevant Cost _______p
Intercontinental’s special order requires 1,000 kilograms of genatope, a solid chemical regularly used in the company’s products. The current stock of genatope is 8,000 kilograms at a book value of 8.10 p per kilogram. If the special order is accepted, the firm will be forced to restock genatope earlier than expected, at a predicted cost of 8.70 p per kilogram. Without the special order, the purchasing manager predicts that the price will be 8.30 p when normal restocking takes place. Any order of genatope must be in the amount of 5,000 kilograms.
Total Relevant Cost ______
For theolite, the relevant cost is the opportunity cost of not selling it to a wholesaler, which is 14,500 p. The incremental cost and the book value yields a total relevant cost of 8,400 p for genatope.
1. Relevant cost of theolite:
The relevant cost of theolite for analyzing the special-order decision is the opportunity cost, which is the value theolite could generate if sold to a wholesaler. Since the company has excess theolite on hand, the relevant cost is the foregone opportunity of selling it, which is 14,500 p.
2. Total relevant cost of genatope:
The total relevant cost of genatope includes both the incremental cost of restocking earlier and the book value of the current stock.
The incremental cost per kilogram for restocking genatope earlier is the difference between the predicted cost of restocking for the special order (8.70 p) and the predicted cost without the special order (8.30 p).
Thus, the incremental cost is 0.40 p per kilogram. Multiplying this by the quantity required (1,000 kilograms) gives an incremental cost of 400 p. Additionally, the book value of the current stock (8,000 kilograms) is relevant and equals 8.10 p per kilogram.
Therefore, the total relevant cost of genatope is the sum of the incremental cost and the book value, which is 8,400 p.
Learn more about stock here :
https://brainly.com/question/21602828
#SPJ11
On May 10, a company issued for cash 1,800 shares of no-par common stock (with a stated value of $5) at $17, and on May 15, it issued for cash 4,000 shares of $18 par preferred stock at $61.
Required:
Journalize the entries for May 10 and 15, assuming that the common stock is to be credited with the stated value. Refer to the Chart of Accounts for exact wording of account titles.
Journalize the entries for May 10 and 15, assuming that the common stock is to be credited with the stated value. Refer to the Chart of Accounts for exact wording of account titles.
PAGE 1
JOURNAL
DATE DESCRIPTION POST. REF. DEBIT CREDIT
The journal entry records an increase in the Cash account and an increase in the Common Stock—$5 Stated Value account for the stated value of the shares issued, and the remaining amount is recorded as an increase in the Paid-in Capital in Excess of Stated Value—Common Stock account.
The journal entries for May 10 and May 15 are as follows:
May 10:
- Debit: Cash $30,600
- Credit: Common Stock—$5 Stated Value $9,000
- Credit: Paid-in Capital in Excess of Stated Value—Common Stock $21,600
May 15:
- Debit: Cash $244,000
- Credit: Preferred Stock $72,000
- Credit: Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par—Preferred Stock $172,000
On May 10, the company issued 1,800 shares of no-par common stock with a stated value of $5 at $17 per share.
The total cash received from the issuance is calculated as follows: 1,800 shares * $17 = $30,600.
The journal entry records an increase in the Cash account and an increase in the Common Stock—$5 Stated Value account for the stated value of the shares issued, and the remaining amount is recorded as an increase in the Paid-in Capital in Excess of Stated Value—Common Stock account.
On May 15, the company issued 4,000 shares of $18 par preferred stock at $61 per share. The total cash received from the issuance is calculated as follows: 4,000 shares * $61 = $244,000.
The journal entry records an increase in the Cash account and an increase in the Preferred Stock account for the par value of the shares issued, and the remaining amount is recorded as an increase in the Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par—Preferred Stock account.
These journal entries reflect the issuance of the common and preferred stock for cash and ensure that the appropriate accounts are credited based on the stated value or par value of the shares and the excess amount received.
Learn more about shares here :
https://brainly.com/question/30673648
#SPJ11
Suppose you are responsible for the design of a new order entry and sales analysis system for a national chain of auto part stores. Each store has a PC that supports office functions. The company also has regional managers who travel from store to store working with the local managers to promote sales. There are four national offices for the regional managers, who each spend about 1 day a week in their office and 4 on the road. Stores place orders to replenish stock on a daily basis, based on the sales history and inventory levels. The company uses the Internet to connect store PCs into the company’s main computer. Each regional manager has a laptop computer to also connect with stores and the main office.
Recommend (briefly describe) a technology architecture for supporting the business activities of the company.
Recommended tech architecture: Distributed client-server model, utilizing Internet for seamless order entry, sales analysis, and communication between store PCs, regional managers' laptops, and main computer.
A distributed client-server model with Internet connectivity offers a scalable and efficient solution. The store PCs would serve as clients, utilizing web-based interfaces or custom software to facilitate order entry and sales analysis. These PCs would connect to the company's main computer through the Internet, enabling real-time data synchronization and centralized data management.
The regional managers' laptops would also connect to the main office and stores, allowing them to access and update information while on the road. This ensures seamless communication and collaboration between regional managers, local managers, and the main office.
This technology architecture enables efficient order processing, accurate sales analysis, and streamlined communication throughout the organization. It leverages the power of the Internet and client-server computing to provide a robust and scalable solution that supports the business activities of the national chain of auto part stores.
Learn more about management here:
https://brainly.com/question/32216947
#SPJ11
a) The residents of Ndola have complained that there is a lack of investment in the water sector by the Ndola city council. Consequently, the council is forced to ration water supplies to households during the dry season, When the council imposes water rationing, it affects the consumer's opportunity sets for each household because the household cannot necessarily buy as much as they want at market prices. The consumer basket of the household consists of food and water, suppose that this year, the council rations water by setting a quota on how much a household can purchase. If a household can afford to buy 12, 000 litres of water per month but the council restricts this to no more than 10,000 litres a month. How does this affect the household's opportunity set? Graphically demonstrate this situation.
In Ndola, the lack of investment in the water sector by the Ndola city council has been one of the residents' main complaints. As a result, the council is forced to ration water supplies to households during the dry season.
When water is rationed, the opportunity sets for each household are affected, as the household cannot purchase as much as they want at market prices. The household's consumer basket is composed of food and water.
In this year the council decided to ration water by setting a quota on how much a household can purchase. A household can afford to buy 12,000 litters of water per month, but the council has restricted this to no more than 10,000 litters a month.
To know more about investment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/15105766
#SPJ11
Scenario - You have been chosen by your director to lead a project of Marketing Research for your College in order to provide extra information to help the board of directors make a more informed decision. The board of directors at your college is reviewing a proposal to offer College Diplomas delivered completely online. The logic behind this proposal is that current students will find this idea attractive as they favor convenience of working online over the experience quality which is higher in classroom lectures and exams. You are required to conduct a research of your choice to help validating or disprove the claims of the proposed idea. Please answer the following Questions: 1. What is the n this Scenario? 2. What is the Marketing Research Objective in this Scenario? 3. What is the nature of the research that can help achieving the Marketing Research Objective in this Scenario? (1 Marks)
1. The n in this scenario is the sample size of the research that will be conducted.
2. The marketing research objective in this scenario is to validate or disprove the claims of the proposed idea of offering college diplomas delivered completely online.
3. The nature of the research that can help achieve the marketing research objective in this scenario is exploratory research.
1. The sample size is an essential factor in any research as it provides the number of individuals who will participate in the study. The n in this scenario is the sample size of the research that will be conducted.
2. The marketing research objective in this scenario is to validate or disprove the claims of the proposed idea of offering college diplomas delivered completely online. The objective of marketing research is to gather information and insights that can help improve the decision-making process of an organization. In this scenario, the board of directors wants to know if the proposed idea of offering online college diplomas is feasible or not.
3. The nature of the research that can help achieve the marketing research objective in this scenario is exploratory research. Exploratory research is conducted to gather initial information that can help define the problem and create hypotheses. Since the proposal of offering online college diplomas is a new idea, exploratory research can help collect data from various sources, such as focus groups, interviews, surveys, and secondary data, to evaluate its feasibility.
To know more about marketing research
https://brainly.com/question/30651551
#SPJ11
the final decision to hire an applicant usually belongs to:
The final decision to hire an applicant usually belongs to the employer or hiring manager.
In the hiring process, the final decision to hire an applicant rests primarily with the employer or hiring manager. They are responsible for evaluating the candidates, reviewing their qualifications and suitability for the position, and making the ultimate hiring decision. The employer or hiring manager considers various factors such as the applicant's skills, experience, qualifications, cultural fit, and overall potential to contribute to the organization. They may also consult with other stakeholders, such as HR professionals or team members, to gather input and insights. Ultimately, the final decision lies with the employer or hiring manager, who has the authority and responsibility to determine which candidate is the best fit for the job. This decision-making process aims to select the most qualified and suitable candidate who aligns with the organization's goals, values, and requirements.
learn more about hiring manager here:
https://brainly.com/question/32798753
#SPJ11
Bonus sting for departing AMP chief AMP's AGM is scheduled for April 30.
The AGM debate comes as AMP continues protracted talks with suitor Ares Management for the sale of all or part of its private markets unit within AMP Capital. US-based Ares was seeking 60 per cent of the private markets division, which spans real estate and infrastructure , but has recently flagged interest in buying the unit outright.
AMP's shares dipped 0.8 per cent on Wednesday to close at $1.23, not far off the stock's COVID-19 trough of $1.11.
Ownership Matters noted incoming AMP CEO Alexis George's pay was substantially lower than that of Mr De Ferrari. "Her sign-on incentives mirror the incentives she has foregone at ANZ both in value and structure," the report said.
Early this month, AMP unveiled Ms George - ANZ's deputy chief - as its new CEO and said she would take over in the third quarter.
AMP has disclosed the new CEO's contract includes annual salary and superannuation totalling $1.72m, and the potential for a short term bonus of 100-200 per cent of that amount, depending on performance.
There is also a substantial sign-on award with a face value of $4.1m in AMP shares. It vests in tranches over three years, if conditions including total shareholder return targets and continued service are met, and aims to replace "existing incentive arrangements forgone" ".
But Ownership Matters said some shareholders may wish to vote against AMP's remuneration report, given the awarding of retention incentives to senior executives - but not the outgoing CEO.
Ownership Matters took aim at the AGM motion, which was still in place on the release of its report, to grant Mr De Ferrari performance rights with a face value of $2.2m.
Extract from Moullakis, J. Bonus sting for departing AMP chief. The Australian. Apr 15, 2021.
Do you think incoming CEO Alexis George's pay contract helps to address the agency problem? Explain.
The incoming CEO's pay contract can help to address the agency problem. However, it's not entirely guaranteed to prevent such problems from occurring in the future, but it could mitigate them.
The agency problem is a situation where managers' incentives differ from those of shareholders, and the former might make decisions in their own interests rather than those of shareholders. Ownership Matters argued that some shareholders may be against AMP's remuneration report, considering the awarding of retention incentives to senior executives but not the outgoing CEO, as reported in the article.
Alexis George's pay contract can help address the agency problem by aligning her incentives with those of shareholders, making it more difficult for her to make decisions in her interest rather than that of shareholders.
Alexis George's annual salary and superannuation total $1.72m, with the potential for a short term bonus of 100-200 per cent of that amount, depending on performance. Furthermore, she is awarded a sign-on bonus worth $4.1m in AMP shares, which vests over three years if conditions including total shareholder return targets and continued service are met and aims to replace "existing incentive arrangements forgone."
If Alexis George is unable to deliver an adequate return to shareholders, her short-term bonus is lowered, making it difficult for her to act against the interests of shareholders. Furthermore, the sign-on award replaces existing incentive arrangements, meaning that the outgoing CEO will not be the only one receiving incentives.
Learn more about contract -
brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ11
