Answer:
endeavour
Explanation:
pick is to choose as attempt is to endeavour
Which of the following choices can change the meaning of a sentence?
personification
mnemonics
inflection
Answer:
mnemonic is the answer for that question
PLEASE (look at the picture) 100 points
Answer:
hope this helps
Explanation:
1. what did you do when you got home after school yesterday?
2. Were you watching TV at 9 o'clock last night?
3. What were you parents doing yesterday at 10 am?
4. Where did you go last summer?
5. Were you listening to music while you were doing your homework yesterday?
6. What did you do last Saturday?
7. What are you doing at 6 o'clock this morning?
Answer:
Explanation:
1. What did you do when you got home yesterday?
2. Were you watching TV at 9 o'clock?
3. Where were your parents yesterday at 10pm?
4. Where did you go last summer?
5. Were you listening to music while doing homework?
6.What did you do last saturday?
7. What were you doing at 6 o'clock this morning?
What do these words from the text mean? Match the words and its definition
helpppp!
Answer: 1) b
2) d
3) e
4) a
5) c
Explanation:
Read this incomplete Works Cited entry for a book about robots in space.
Everson, Lewis. _____. New York: King
Publications, 1999.
What is the correct way to write the book title to complete the entry?
What is the main conflict in the “the gift of the magi”?
Answer:
In "The Gift of the Magi," the main conflict is that Della does not have enough money saved to buy the gift she thinks Jim deserves.
Explanation:
Answer:
Della and Jim each want to give the other a fine gift, but they are very poor.
Explanation:
Does the world of work seem small or big to you? EXPLAIN!!!
Answer:
the world seems small to me cause there's so much to discover and explore and to just see, i've always wanted to explore the world and see everyone culture, religion, food, and so forth but cov!d stopped me but i still want to pursue my exploring soon
Explanation:
How do you feel people should respond when they hear perspectives that are hurtful to themselves or to others? Should they ignore them? Get angry? Or should they find a way to argue against the harmful perspectives? Write a paragraph or two in response.
Answer and Explanation:
This question is asking for a personal opinion. Consider the following answer an example, and feel free to change and adapt it to your own point of view:
When people hear perspectives that are hurtful to themselves or to others, they have, in my opinion, two options. They can either choose to ignore them or to argue against them. Some things must be taken into consideration when deciding which way to go, though. The person who is thinking of arguing may ask him/herself whether this discussion is worth the time and effort. They may consider their audience - perhaps the person who voiced the hurtful perspectives in the first place is rude, aggressive, even violent. In that case, it may very well be better to just let go, to just find a better place - and a better audience - to comment and discuss that matter.
If, however, he or she decides to argue - if the audience is open to it, if he or she feels it is worth their time and effort- , he or she must do so with confidence and patience. No hurtful perspective is worth getting angry over. As a matter of fact, once someone displays anger, he or she loses face.
Today do you think it is more likely that a computer or a human being would be respnsible for a serious system problem?Why?
Answer:
Humans will make more errors than humans
Explanation:
computers are made to follow instructions, so you won't ever see a computer doing something it wasn't programmed to do, with humans it's a different story.
RIDDLES FOR POINTS
1. This belongs to you, but everyone else uses it.
p.s. It is not an object
2. What has a neck and no head, two arms and no hands, and a waist but no legs?
p.s. it is and object
Answer:
The first one is your name.
I think the second one is a shirt?
Write an attractive advertisment
Thesis of the "The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County" and supporting statements
Answer:
“The Notorious Jumping Frog of Calaveras County” is a short story written by Mark Twain. The story deals with themes of cheating, integrity, and community. Both local people and outsiders attempt to misdirect each other in this story.
What rules applies to long quotations in MLA in-text citations a) Surround with quotation marks; double space lines b) Indent and start a new line; single space lines c)indent and start a new line; double space lines
Answer:
c). indent and start a new line; double space lines.
Explanation:
The rules for in-text citations in MLA(Modern Language Association) format for long quotations include an "indent with a margin of half-inch, the quote begins from a new line and follows double spacing." The use of quotations marks is strictly prohibited in case of long quotations(comprising of more than four lines). They are located in a free-standing pattern with the indent towards the left side and required to be written using double space to separate it from the original content followed by the author's last name and page number in parenthesis post the last full stop. Thus, option c is the correct answer.
Who says the following and why?
"What is life but a series of inspired follies? The difficulty is to find them to do. Never lose a chance: it doesn't come
every day."
A. Pickering is displaying his famous wit.
B. Higgins is convincing himself to take the Liza project on
C. Mrs. Pearce is sarcastically trying to make Higgins reconsider taking Liza in.
D. Mrs. Higgins is making excuses for Henry's behavior.
Answer:
"What is life but a series of inspired follies? The difficulty is to find them to do. Never lose a chance: it doesn't come every day." These lines from Pygmalion are spoken by Professor Higgins, who is convincing himself of accepting Liza as a pupil.
Explanation:
I. Choose the words whose underlined part is pronounced differently from that of the others in each group 1. A. Leaves B. Arrives C. Finishes D. Goes
Answer:
The answer is, Finishes
Explanation:
I hope this helps you out!
What stanza structure is for “Annabel Lee” by Edgar Allan Poe
Answer:
Poetic structure
" Annabel Lee" consists of six stanzas, three with six lines, one with seven, and two with eight, with the rhyme pattern differing slightly in each one. Though it is not technically a ballad, Poe referred to it as one.
What was most likely the author’s immediate purpose in writing "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?”
Answer:
The most likely author's immediate purpose in writing "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?” is to persuade readers about the unjust treatment of African American.Hope it's helpful for you❤️❤️❤️❤️
Click to read the passage from "The Birthmark," by Nathaniel Hawthorne.
Then answer the question.
Based on this passage, which conflict is most likely to occur later in the
story?
A. A conflict between Aylmer's love of science and of his wife
B. A conflict between Aylmer's wife's talents and his own
C. A conflict between Aylmer's scientific talents and spirituality
D. A conflict between Aylmer and his wife
Answer:
C. A conflict between Aylmer's scientific talents and spirituality
Based on this passage, a conflict between Aylmer's scientific talents and spirituality is most likely to occur later in the story. The correct option is C.
What are the conflicts in the birthmark?In the short story, Georgiana must decide between removing the birthmark and making Alymer happy or keeping it to maintain her happiness and seeing Alymer view the birthmark the way he does for the rest of their life. This choice represents a battle between man and self. Because she is unsure which one to select, she is at odds with herself.
Aylmer demonstrates risky hubris when he refuses to accept Georgiana's close to perfection and instead tries to alter nature's creation to suit himself. Georgiana dies as a result of this pride.
Thus, the ideal selection is option C.
Learn more about birthmarks here:
https://brainly.com/question/11843610
#SPJ7
which is the correct answer
Answer:
3rd
Explanation:
What is the best way to describe a counter-claim?
an opposing viewpoint
a restated viewpoint
another view of the argument
an unrealistic way to look at an argument
Answer:
A restated Viewpoint
Explanation:
A counter-claim exists to state the limitation of the original claim, it does not describe an unrealistic viewpoint (at least not always), It can be described as an opposing viewpoint, but a counter claim does not come up with a random reason as to why the viewpoint is incorrect, a counter claim takes the original claim (viewpoint) and describes what is wrong with it. It can also be considered another view of an argument, but having a counterclaim does not create another party or group, but rather (as I said) takes what was originally said, and shows what is wrong with it.
Therefore, the best answer (out of the options listed) is B - A restated view point.
Answer:
a restated viewpoint
Explanation:
Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerpt
Executive Mansion, Washington,
April 4, 1864.
A. G. Hodges, Esq., Frankfort, Ky.
My Dear Sir:
You ask me to put in writing the substance of what I verbally stated the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and Senator Dixon. It was about as follows:
I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong nothing is wrong. I cannot remember when I did not so think and feel; and yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially in this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it in my view that I might take the oath to get power, and break the oath in using the power.
I understood, too, that in ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery. I had publicly declared this many times and in many ways; and I aver that, to this day I have done no official act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on slavery. I did understand, however, that my oath to preserve the Constitution to the best of my ability imposed upon me the duty of preserving, by every indispensable means, that government, that nation, of which that Constitution was the organic law. Was it possible to lose the nation, and yet preserve the Constitution?
By general law, life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the Constitution through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel that to the best of my ability I had even tried to preserve the Constitution, if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution altogether.
When, early in the war, General Fremont attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think it an indispensable necessity. When, a little later, General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks, I objected, because I did not yet think it an indispensable necessity. When, still later, General Hunter attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not yet think the indispensable necessity had come. When, in March and May and July, 1862, I made earnest and successive appeals to the Border States to favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable necessity for military emancipation and arming the blacks would come, unless averted by that measure. They declined the proposition; and I was, in my best judgment, driven to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, and with it the Constitution, or of laying strong hand upon the colored element. I chose the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss; but of this I was not entirely confident...
Yours truly,
A. Lincoln
Use context to determine the meaning of the words in bold. (4 points)
Hello. You did not have any words in bold in the text presented in the question above. This prevents your question from being answered. However, when searching for your question, I was able to find a question exactly like yours, which showed the following words in bold: organic law, indispensable necessity.
If that's the case for you, I hope the answer below will help you.
Answer and Explanation:
Taking into account the context clues, we can see that when the author of the letter uses the words "organic law" he is referring to the basic laws and common principles in a society. Through the context clues we can also understand that when the author of the letter uses the words "indispensable necessity" he is referring to a need that is crucial and very important.
These two examples show how context clues are very important features during a reading, because they enable the reader to understand unfamiliar or difficult words through the context of the sentence or the text itself, allowing the reader to understand the entire text well.
which element can help you identify the theme of a story
Answer:
To identify the theme, be sure that you've first identified the story's plot, the way the story uses characterization, and the primary conflict in the story.
Explanation:
Let America be America again What does the phrase "And who are you that draws your veil
across the stars?" likely mean, as it is used in line 18?
A Who is this person who is talking about space exploration?
B Who is this person who is talking over me when I am
speaking?
C Who is this person who is talking negatively about my
positive attitude?
D Who is this person who is talking negatively about the
design of the American flag?
Answer:
C Who is this person who is talking negatively about my positive attitude?
Explanation:
"Let America be America again" is a poem written by Langston Hughes, where he reflects on the vision of the American dream and the hope of a just and equal America. At the beginning of the poem, he states that America is a land of dreams and hope, but that this is unavailable to him. Then he asks himself "And who are you that draws your veil across the stars?" which shows that someone is not agreeing with him, but speaking negatively about his positive view of America. This is because Hughes begins to say that this positive view of America is false, as it was never this wonderful place, as there are so many people being treated unfairly.
Let America be America again is a famous poem that is written by American poet Langston Hughes in 1935. It was published by 1936 issue of Esquire Magazine.
Correct option is C.
"And who are you that draws your curtain across the stars?. he wonders. This indicated that someone does not agree with him and is criticising his positive perspective of America. This is because Hughes goes on to add that this optimistic vision of America is incorrect, because it was never like this, and there are so many individuals who are treated cruelly.
To know more about Let America be America again, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/2429515?referrer=searchResults
Read the excerpt from the final paragraph of "Wilson's War Message to Congress."
But the right is more precious than peace, and we shall fight for the things which we have always carried nearest our hearts—for democracy, for the right of those who submit to authority to have a voice in their own governments. . .
The most likely purpose of including this in the last paragraph is to
Answer:
Establish a sense of patriotism and support for the war.
Explanation:
What kind of language is used in bright romantic literature?
Answer: figurative language
Explanation: Both use figurative language to express hope that the subject will be rewarded in heaven for good deeds. Bradstreet's topic is love and marriage, while Wheatley's topic is King George III.
Answer: figurative language
Explanation:
People........ (meet) and ....... (share) their Joys and sorrows over several cups of tea.
Answer:
Um what do I need to do here....I think this person was just saying the answer I don't know XDD
Explanation:
How does the old man explain the concept of Personal Legends to Santiago in the alchemist?
Answer:
Melchizedek explains the concept of the Personal Legend to Santiago. A person's Personal Legend, he says, represents what that person most desires to accomplish in his or her life. ... Melchizedek asks Santiago why he lives as a shepherd. When Santiago says he likes to travel, Melchizedek points to a baker working nearby.Hey, I need someone to help me out. My mom's wanting me to write a five paragraph essay about why I didn't answer her, and I'm just so tired of everything.
She called me for something and I told her that I couldn't pause the game. Said she didn't care, so I didn't go.
Then she called me and my siblings to do our chores, and she came in as I was wrapping up my game to tell me to write the essay. I'm assuming because I didn't respond fast enough.
I'll give more details if they're needed, and edit it later so it looks more like I wrote it.
Please and thankyou-
100 points and Brainliest
Hey there!
1: Emotions may indicate "revulsion", confusion, wickedness
2: Yes, compassion for horse vision loss and depiction of its bones is shown.
Have a great day!
Give answer from following bracket .
Answer:
i) isn't it
ii) We don't have many apples
iii) Where is he planning to go?
iv) I had read novels.
v) The teachers asked the students if they had done their project works.
vi) The prime minister was elected by us.
Explanation:
what are the dangers that teenagers must steer clear of it in your youth?
Answer:
Especially in the western world, there is the huge risk of teenage pregnancies. Having children at such a tender age is not good for both the mother and the child. Also, there is the risk of drug and alcohol abuse. There is the risk of speeding and meeting with accidents that could be fatal.Explanation:
GIVE BRAINLIST