Point A(3,8)
and point B(−1,1)
are located within the coordinate plane.
what is the distance from A to B?

Answer:

From the figure, we´ll use the ratio of sin74

sin74=x/16

x=16/sin74

x=16.64

OAmalOHopeO

Answer:

(3,6)

Step-by-step explanation:

-2x+3y=12

Let x = 3

-2(3) +3y = 12

-6+3y = 12

Add 6 to each side

-6+6 +3y = 12+6

3y = 18

Divide each side by 3

3y/3 = 18/3

y = 6

Answer:

52.8988%

Step-by-step explanation:

Add the bach degrees together and divide it by the total number of degrees

Answer:

y=-176/x

y=176/9

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]y = \frac{k}{x} \\ - 11 = \frac{k}{16} \\ k = - 176 \\ y = \frac{ - 176}{x} \\ y = \frac{ -176}{ -9} = 19 \frac{5}{9} [/tex]

Answer:

84%

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not sure how I got that answer but I'm just smart like that. I'm sorry I couldn't give a better explanation. I'm in a bit of a rush but I hope this answer is helpful to you. Percentage was the only way I could think of. Sorry again.

The difference between  CDs sold between 1993 and 2001 will be 76.7 × 10⁵.

To subtract in mathematics is to take something away from a group or a number of objects.

In another meaning subtraction is a mathematical operation such that two values are going to subtract and give a resultant value.

The group's total number of items decreases or becomes lower when we subtract from it.

Given that sell of CDs in 1993 is 2.3 × 10⁶.

Sell of CDs in 2001 is 7.9 × 10⁷.

The difference between sell is = 7.9 × 10⁷ - 2.3 × 10⁶

⇒ 76.7 × 10⁵ hence it will the correct option.

For more about subtraction,

https://brainly.com/question/1927340

#SPJ2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

you can use the rise over run technique, where you count how many units you go down or up, left or right to get to the next point. or use the slope formula :

(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

the pairs given :

(1,6) and (3,2)

(2-6)/(3-1) = -4/2 = -2

-2 is the slope. the line is going downwards so there is a negative slope

Answer:

A) 89 personas prefieren ver sólo deportes.

B) 122 personas prefieren ver sólo un programa de televisión

C) 33 personas prefieren ver películas o musicales.

Step-by-step explanation:

Dado que una empresa realizó una encuesta a 250 personas para saber qué programa de televisión prefieren ver en domingo, y se les dieron 3 opciones: deportes, películas o musicales, donde el resultado de la encuesta fue: 130 personas prefieren deportes; 80 prefieren ver películas; 40, musicales; 25 prefieren deportes y películas; 20, películas y musicales; 10, deportes y musicales; y sólo a 6 personas les gustan los tres tipos de programas; para determinar A) cuántas prefieren ver sólo deportes, B) cuántas prefieren ver sólo un programa de televisión; y C) cuántas prefieren ver películas o musicales, se deben realizar los siguientes cálculos:

A)

130 - 25 - 10 - 6 = 89

B)

80 - 25 - 20 - 6 = 29

40 - 20 - 10 - 6 = 4

89 + 29 + 4 = 122

C)

29 + 4 = 33

3/4 is equivalent to 75%.

To find the percentage of a fraction, you simply just divide the numerator by the denominator. 3/4=0.75, which is 75%.

Answer:

75%....3/4 expressed as a percentage is just multiplying 3/4 and 100

Answer:

Y = 1/4 x -3

Step-by-step explanation:

x1 y1  x2 y2

0 -3  -8 -5

ΔY -2    

ΔX -8    

slope=   1/4    

B= -3          

Y =0.25X +-3    

Answer:

4.5, - 27, 162, - 972, 5832

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the recursive rule and a₁ = 4.5 , then

a₂ = - 6a₁ = - 6 × 4.5 = - 27

a₃ = - 6a₂ = - 6 × - 27 = 162

a₄ = - 6a₃ = - 6 × 162 = - 972

a₅ = - 6a₄ = - 6 × - 972 = 5832

The first 5 terms are 4.5, - 27, 162, - 972, 5832

Answer:

Smaller factor/larger figure = 3/6 = ½

Step-by-step explanation:

Scale factor of similar figures is usually the ratio of one to the other.

In the diagram given, the scale factor is the length of any side of the smaller figure divided by the length of the corresponding side length of the bigger figure.

Length of smaller figure = 3

Corresponding length of larger figure = 6

Scale factor = smaller figure/larger figure = 3/6

Simplify

Scale factor = ½

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

This is most easily solved with calculus, believe it or not. It is way more direct and to the point, with a whole lot less math!

The position function is given. The velocity function is the first derivative of the position, so if we find the velocity function and set it equal to 0, we can solve for the amount of time it takes for the rocket to reach its max height. Remember from physics that at the top of a parabolic path, the velocity is 0.

If:

[tex]s(t)=-16t^2+112t+360[/tex], then the velocity function, the first derivative is:

v(t) = -32t + 112 and solve for t:

-112 = -32t so

t = 3.5 seconds. Now we know how long it takes to get to the max height, we just need to find out what the max height is.

Go back to the position function and sub in 3.5 for t to tell us that position of the rocket at 3.5 seconds, which translates to the max height:

[tex]s(3.5)=-16(3.5)^2+112(3.5)+360[/tex] and

s(3.5) = 206 feet. I imagine that your answer, if you had to choose one from the list, would be 200 feet, rounded a lot.

Answer:

Corina can make 3 friendship bracelets.

Step-by-step explanation:

Solve for how much string is needed for one friendship bracelet:

4 pieces × 1 foot

4 feet

Convert feet into inches (1 foot = 12 inches):

4 feet × 12 inches

48 inches

Divide the total string by each bracelet's string:

144 inches ÷ 48 inches

3 friendship bracelets

Answer:лаксдкннйд

Step-by-step explanation:

Answers:

======================================

Explanation:

In this context, a zero is another term for x intercept or root. This is where the graph either touches or crosses the x axis. This occurs in three locations: x = -3, x = 2, and x = 0. So those are the three roots. That makes the first three statements true, while the remaining two others are false.

Side note: x = 0 doesn't always have to be involved. Its quite possible to have x = 0 not be an x intercept. The term "zero" is a bit misleading in that regard. I prefer either "root" or "x intercept" instead.

Answer:

bro the co ordinates are in the picture itself

Answer:

A'(-3,0) ; B'(0,0); C'(3,6) ; D'(-3,6)

Step-by-step explanation:

O(-6,-6)

A( -5 , -4)  = A( -6+1 , -6 + 2)

A'(-6+3 ,-6+6) = A'(-3,0)

B(-4,-4) = B(-6+2 , -6+2)

B'(-6+6,-6+6)= B'(0,0)

C(-3,-2) = C(-6+3, -6+4)

C'(-6+9 , -6+12) = C'(3,6)

D(-5 , -2) = D(-6+1 , -6 +4)

D'(-6+3, -6+12)=D'(-3,6)

Answer:

160m

Step-by-step explanation:

Since the rectangles are similar and we have their proportion of coefficient, the larger rectangle is twice the smaller rectangle.

Furthermore, the ratio of two longer sides should equal the ratio of the two shorter sides.

Therefore, for our case, we multiply the smaller rectangle by 2.

Hence;

(80 × 2)m

= 160 m

NB:

The ratio of the areas of two similar shapes or figures is equivalent to the square of the corresponding sides.

Answer:

If u add the number it will show u te answer which is 7

Step-by-step explanation:

The ratio 4:3 means for every 4 girls there are 3 boys.

Divide total girls by 4, multiply that by 3 to get total boys:

180/4 = 45 x 3 = 135

There are 135 boys

For total students add boys and girls:

180 + 135 = 315 total students

Answer:

TE = 7

Step-by-step explanation:

The centroid divides a median in this ratios 1/3 and 2/3. In particular

XT = 2/3 XE

XT = 2/3 * 21

XT = 14

TE = 7

Answer:

The set [tex]S[/tex] of non-negative integers in the inequality [tex]2x < 4[/tex] is

[tex]S = \{0, 1\}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The non-negative integers are given as [tex]\mathbb{Z}_{\ge 0} = \{ 0, 1, 2, \ldots \}[/tex]

For the inequality [tex]2x < 4[/tex], we have

[tex]2x < 4 \implies x < \dfrac{4}{2} \implies x < 2[/tex]

Therefore,

[tex]x\in \mathbb{R}:x\in(\infty, 2)[/tex]

Note: 2 is not included

The integers are

[tex]\ldots -2, -1, 0, 1[/tex]

And the non-negative integers are

[tex]0, 1[/tex]

Answer:

2x+3x=90

or ,5x=90

or,x=90/5

X=18

Answer:

90/5=18 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

i think its b Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] \frac{5x}{ \frac{5x}{3} } = \frac{15x}{5x} = 3[/tex]

Answer:

Pam: $181

Amanda: $362

Julie: $452

Step-by-step explanation:

(What does Mike have to do with this problem?)

Let a = Amanda's pay

Let p = Pam's pay

Let j = Julie's pay

"Amanda made twice what Pam earned"

a = 2p

"Julie made $90 more than Amanda"

j = a + 90

j = 2p + 90

Pam earned p

Total salary

a + p + j = 2p + p + 2p + 90

Total salary

$995

2p + p + 2p + 90 = 995

5p = 905

p = 181

a = 2p = 2(181) = 362

j = 2p + 90 = 362 + 90 = 452

Answer:

Pam: $181

Amanda: $362

Julie: $452

Answer:

profit is 25%

Step-by-step explanation:

profit%=sp-cp/cp×100%

=350-280/280×100%

=0.25×100

=25%

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

taking the inverse is essentially saying

x = (f(x) + 3)^2

root(x) - 3 = f(x) and -root(x) -3 = f(x)

(you have to take both the positive and negative roots)

plug in 49 for x and get 4 and -10.

The value of the inverse function, to the function f(x) = (x + 3)², at f(x) = 49, is; f⁻¹(49) = 4

The notation f⁻¹(x) represents the inverse of the function f(x). The inverse function, f⁻¹(x) undoes the the effect of the function f(x), meaning, that if y = f(x), then x = f⁻¹(y)

The value of f⁻¹(49) for the function, f(x) = (x + 3)² is the x-value, such that f(x) = 49, which can be obtained by solving the equation f(x) = (x + 3)², for x as follows;

Taking the square root of both sides of the equation, we get;

√(f(x)) = √((x + 3)²)

√(f(x)) = (x + 3)

Subtracting 3 from both sides, we get;

√(f(x)) - 3 = x + 3 - 3 = x

√(f(x)) - 3 = x

The above function is the inverse function, f⁻¹(x) that takes an output value, f(x), to produce the corresponding input value, x of the original function;

The inverse function, f⁻¹(x) = √(f(x)) - 3, takes the original output, f(x) to produce the original input x

When the output value is f(x) = 49 we get;

f⁻¹(49) = √(49) - 3 = ±7 - 3

Restricting the domain of the original function, f(x) to (x + 3) ≥ 0, or x ≥ -3, so that its inverse is also a function and produces only one value, we get;

f⁻¹(49) = 7 - 3 = 4

f⁻¹(49) = 4

Learn more on the inverse of a function here: https://brainly.com/question/1559611

#SPJ2

3 rolls would cost $1.17.

There exists a direct proportion between two values when one exists as a multiple of the other.

In direct proportion, if one quantity exists increased or decreased then the other quantity increases or declines, respectively. But in indirect or inverse proportion, if one quantity increases then the different quantity decreases and vice-versa.

If 7 rolls of tape cost $2.73,

Then 1 roll of tape would cost $2.73/7 = $0.39

Now, the cost of 3 roll of tapes would be 0.39*3 = $1.17

Therefore, at same rate the 3 rolls of tape would cost $1.17.

To learn more about Direct Proportion refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/1266676

#SPJ2

Answer:

m,4+ a+b

Step-by-step explanation:

an exterior angle equals the sum of the 2 opposite interior angles